Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 7 Plus

Marcus Herbrich (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 05/23/2018

Smartphone Android One. Os compradores do Nokia 7 Plus desfrutarão de atualizações de software oportunas, Android stock e correções de segurança atualizadas graças ao Programa Android One. Se o novo smartphone de gama média com o novo Snapdragon 660 também consegue impressionar em termos de hardware, você descobrirá em nossa análise.

Nokia 7 Plus (7 Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 512
Memória
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4
Pantalha
6 polegadas 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, Capacitiva, Multi-Touch, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 48 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5-mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 256 GB , 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de proximidade, sensor de movimento, E-compass, Giroscópio, sensor de efeito Hall, USB-C, Miracast, OTG
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GPRS / EDGE (2G): 850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz; UMTS / HSPA (3G): 850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz; LTE (4G): 800, 900, 1800, 2100, 2600 MHz - Frequenz-Bänder 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.55 x 158.4 x 75.64
Bateria
3800 mAh Lítio-Ion, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 19 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 720 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix Dual-camera 12 MP (f/1.75, 1.4 µm) + 12 MP (f/2.6, 1.0 µm)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0, 1.0 µm
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: ALto-falante mono com SMART amp, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Capa protetora, carregador USB-C, cabo de carregamento/dados, manual, ferramente de ejeção do cartão SIM, Android One, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR: 0.361 W/kg (head), 1.77 W/kg(body), fanless
peso
186 g, Suprimento de energia: 51 g
Preço
399 Euro

 

Nokia 7 Plus
Nokia 7 Plus
Nokia 7 Plus
Nokia 7 Plus
Nokia 7 Plus
Nokia 7 Plus
Nokia 7 Plus
Nokia 7 Plus
Nokia 7 Plus

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
247 MBit/s ∼39%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
53.7 MBit/s ∼8% -78%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
334 MBit/s ∼53% +35%
Wiko WIM
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
351 MBit/s ∼55% +42%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 32 GB eMMC Flash
280 MBit/s ∼44% +13%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
386 MBit/s ∼61% +56%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
329 MBit/s ∼52% +33%
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
635 MBit/s ∼100% +157%
Average of class Smartphone
  (30.5 - 939, n=243)
189 MBit/s ∼30% -23%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
307 MBit/s ∼47%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 MBit/s ∼9% -82%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
305 MBit/s ∼47% -1%
Wiko WIM
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
276 MBit/s ∼42% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 32 GB eMMC Flash
269 MBit/s ∼41% -12%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 MBit/s ∼100% +112%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
651 MBit/s ∼100% +112%
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
437 MBit/s ∼67% +42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (44.3 - 703, n=243)
185 MBit/s ∼28% -40%
GPS Nokia 7 Plus
GPS Nokia 7 Plus
GPS Nokia 7 Plus
GPS Nokia 7 Plus
GPS Nokia 7 Plus
GPS Nokia 7 Plus
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
HDR mode
HDR mode
HDR mode (auto)
HDR mode (auto)
Standard mode
Standard mode
Photos with...
Photos with...
...a Bokeh effect
...a Bokeh effect
2x zoom
2x zoom
Normal
Normal

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
485
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
479
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
448
cd/m²
484
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 485 cd/m² Médio: 463 cd/m² Minimum: 2.76 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 458 cd/m²
Contraste: 2082:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.19
Nokia 7 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
IPS, 1920x1080, 6
Wiko WIM
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 5.6
OnePlus 5T
AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6.01
Samsung Galaxy S8
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8
Huawei P20 Pro
OLED, 2240x1080, 6.1
Screen
-25%
-4%
-28%
7%
22%
24%
43%
Brightness middle
458
456
0%
659
44%
344
-25%
541
18%
425
-7%
566
24%
569
24%
Brightness
463
455
-2%
680
47%
353
-24%
538
16%
423
-9%
564
22%
578
25%
Brightness Distribution
92
85
-8%
88
-4%
90
-2%
96
4%
92
0%
94
2%
95
3%
Black Level *
0.22
0.56
-155%
Contrast
2082
1177
-43%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4
5.6
-40%
2.8
30%
5.7
-43%
5.8
-45%
2.1
47%
2.7
32%
1.3
67%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.4
11.1
-50%
6.5
12%
12.2
-65%
3.4
54%
5.4
27%
2.1
72%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.7
6.9
-47%
3
36%
5.1
-9%
2.7
43%
2.5
47%
3.1
34%
1.6
66%
Gamma
2.19 110%
2.3 104%
2.18 110%
2.73 88%
2.07 116%
2.32 103%
2.15 112%
2.31 104%
CCT
7425 88%
7883 82%
6938 94%
7407 88%
6570 99%
6455 101%
6335 103%
6401 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
81.57
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.87

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8895 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.4 ms rise
↘ 22.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.4 ms).
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
141701 Points ∼66%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
81789 Points ∼38% -42%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
89349 Points ∼42% -37%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
116746 Points ∼54% -18%
OnePlus 5T
214815 Points ∼100% +52%
Huawei P20 Pro
207959 Points ∼97% +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (126462 - 141701, n=4)
137438 Points ∼64% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 290397, n=113)
103239 Points ∼48% -27%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
6077 Points ∼87%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
5558 Points ∼80% -9%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
5051 Points ∼72% -17%
Wiko WIM
4660 Points ∼67% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5214 Points ∼75% -14%
OnePlus 5T
6595 Points ∼94% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S8
5370 Points ∼77% -12%
Huawei P20 Pro
6982 Points ∼100% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (5965 - 6124, n=4)
6040 Points ∼87% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (3138 - 8601, n=201)
4453 Points ∼64% -27%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
6825 Points ∼84%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
7846 Points ∼97% +15%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
5083 Points ∼63% -26%
Wiko WIM
5621 Points ∼69% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5916 Points ∼73% -13%
OnePlus 5T
7739 Points ∼95% +13%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6035 Points ∼74% -12%
Huawei P20 Pro
8115 Points ∼100% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (6332 - 7026, n=4)
6727 Points ∼83% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2516 - 10264, n=365)
4677 Points ∼58% -31%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
1101 Points ∼83%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
828 Points ∼62% -25%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
912 Points ∼69% -17%
Wiko WIM
933 Points ∼70% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1195 Points ∼90% +9%
OnePlus 5T
1329 Points ∼100% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S8
1156 Points ∼87% +5%
Huawei P20 Pro
1273 Points ∼96% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1092 - 1146, n=4)
1112 Points ∼84% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=441)
672 Points ∼51% -39%
Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
2298 Points ∼38%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
1026 Points ∼17% -55%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
1492 Points ∼24% -35%
Wiko WIM
965 Points ∼16% -58%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1331 Points ∼22% -42%
OnePlus 5T
6100 Points ∼100% +165%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6096 Points ∼100% +165%
Huawei P20 Pro
3725 Points ∼61% +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (2279 - 2298, n=4)
2290 Points ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=441)
1505 Points ∼25% -35%
Memory (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
2503 Points ∼62%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
1108 Points ∼27% -56%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
1325 Points ∼33% -47%
Wiko WIM
1007 Points ∼25% -60%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
2275 Points ∼56% -9%
OnePlus 5T
3845 Points ∼95% +54%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3039 Points ∼75% +21%
Huawei P20 Pro
4050 Points ∼100% +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (2256 - 2503, n=4)
2431 Points ∼60% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4798, n=441)
1124 Points ∼28% -55%
System (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
4976 Points ∼83%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
3261 Points ∼55% -34%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
3287 Points ∼55% -34%
Wiko WIM
3549 Points ∼59% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
4358 Points ∼73% -12%
OnePlus 5T
5872 Points ∼98% +18%
Samsung Galaxy S8
5386 Points ∼90% +8%
Huawei P20 Pro
5965 Points ∼100% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (4797 - 5229, n=4)
5013 Points ∼84% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=441)
2244 Points ∼38% -55%
Overall (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
2369 Points ∼64%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
1323 Points ∼36% -44%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
1560 Points ∼42% -34%
Wiko WIM
1339 Points ∼36% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1993 Points ∼54% -16%
OnePlus 5T
3678 Points ∼100% +55%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3277 Points ∼89% +38%
Huawei P20 Pro
3271 Points ∼89% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (2330 - 2394, n=5)
2353 Points ∼64% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 4308, n=444)
1134 Points ∼31% -52%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
5867 Points ∼87%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
4320 Points ∼64% -26%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
4234 Points ∼63% -28%
Wiko WIM
4562 Points ∼68% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
4431 Points ∼66% -24%
OnePlus 5T
6670 Points ∼99% +14%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6711 Points ∼99% +14%
Huawei P20 Pro
6756 Points ∼100% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (5806 - 5867, n=5)
5844 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1131 - 10558, n=185)
3970 Points ∼59% -32%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
1646 Points ∼82%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
875 Points ∼44% -47%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
865 Points ∼43% -47%
Wiko WIM
939 Points ∼47% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1526 Points ∼76% -7%
OnePlus 5T
1962 Points ∼98% +19%
Samsung Galaxy S8
1997 Points ∼100% +21%
Huawei P20 Pro
1922 Points ∼96% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1579 - 1646, n=5)
1614 Points ∼81% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4265, n=186)
1175 Points ∼59% -29%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
2749 Points ∼90%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
2177 Points ∼71% -21%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
1706 Points ∼56% -38%
Wiko WIM
2106 Points ∼69% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1950 Points ∼64% -29%
OnePlus 5T
3068 Points ∼100% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S8
2494 Points ∼81% -9%
Huawei P20 Pro
2926 Points ∼95% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (2628 - 2757, n=4)
2718 Points ∼89% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (530 - 3669, n=290)
1554 Points ∼51% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
1161 Points ∼29%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
381 Points ∼9% -67%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
727 Points ∼18% -37%
Wiko WIM
381 Points ∼9% -67%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
618 Points ∼15% -47%
OnePlus 5T
4016 Points ∼100% +246%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3472 Points ∼86% +199%
Huawei P20 Pro
3017 Points ∼75% +160%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1161 - 1201, n=4)
1181 Points ∼29% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (67 - 5220, n=290)
1056 Points ∼26% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
1332 Points ∼35%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
467 Points ∼12% -65%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
833 Points ∼22% -37%
Wiko WIM
466 Points ∼12% -65%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
729 Points ∼19% -45%
OnePlus 5T
3758 Points ∼100% +182%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3194 Points ∼85% +140%
Huawei P20 Pro
2996 Points ∼80% +125%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1332 - 1372, n=5)
1351 Points ∼36% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (83 - 4732, n=298)
1012 Points ∼27% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
2734 Points ∼90%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
2157 Points ∼71% -21%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
1698 Points ∼56% -38%
Wiko WIM
2140 Points ∼71% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1946 Points ∼64% -29%
OnePlus 5T
3031 Points ∼100% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S8
2440 Points ∼81% -11%
Huawei P20 Pro
2885 Points ∼95% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (2638 - 2736, n=4)
2697 Points ∼89% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (524 - 3642, n=321)
1455 Points ∼48% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
1895 Points ∼33%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
743 Points ∼13% -61%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
1256 Points ∼22% -34%
Wiko WIM
742 Points ∼13% -61%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
879 Points ∼15% -54%
OnePlus 5T
5791 Points ∼100% +206%
Samsung Galaxy S8
4923 Points ∼85% +160%
Huawei P20 Pro
3335 Points ∼58% +76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1856 - 1938, n=4)
1895 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 8312, n=321)
1426 Points ∼25% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
2035 Points ∼42%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
870 Points ∼18% -57%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
1333 Points ∼28% -34%
Wiko WIM
868 Points ∼18% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1001 Points ∼21% -51%
OnePlus 5T
4816 Points ∼100% +137%
Samsung Galaxy S8
4015 Points ∼83% +97%
Huawei P20 Pro
3223 Points ∼67% +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1999 - 2059, n=4)
2029 Points ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 6378, n=329)
1227 Points ∼25% -40%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
20085 Points ∼90%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
16146 Points ∼72% -20%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
13054 Points ∼58% -35%
Wiko WIM
16939 Points ∼75% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
13306 Points ∼59% -34%
OnePlus 5T
21348 Points ∼95% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S8
21543 Points ∼96% +7%
Huawei P20 Pro
22441 Points ∼100% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (19050 - 21016, n=4)
20094 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (5462 - 36494, n=476)
12164 Points ∼54% -39%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
29333 Points ∼50%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
13491 Points ∼23% -54%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
18528 Points ∼32% -37%
Wiko WIM
13241 Points ∼23% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
15262 Points ∼26% -48%
OnePlus 5T
58097 Points ∼100% +98%
Samsung Galaxy S8
36347 Points ∼63% +24%
Huawei P20 Pro
33472 Points ∼58% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (26322 - 29333, n=4)
28486 Points ∼49% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2396 - 113380, n=476)
15585 Points ∼27% -47%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
26610 Points ∼63%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
14003 Points ∼33% -47%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
16949 Points ∼40% -36%
Wiko WIM
14074 Points ∼33% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
14779 Points ∼35% -44%
OnePlus 5T
42022 Points ∼100% +58%
Samsung Galaxy S8
31532 Points ∼75% +18%
Huawei P20 Pro
30176 Points ∼72% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (24669 - 26731, n=4)
26046 Points ∼62% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2841 - 64405, n=477)
13472 Points ∼32% -49%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
50 fps ∼41%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
23 fps ∼19% -54%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
29 fps ∼24% -42%
Wiko WIM
23 fps ∼19% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
34 fps ∼28% -32%
OnePlus 5T
113 fps ∼93% +126%
Samsung Galaxy S8
121 fps ∼100% +142%
Huawei P20 Pro
121 fps ∼100% +142%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (43 - 50, n=4)
47.3 fps ∼39% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 177, n=502)
27 fps ∼22% -46%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
48 fps ∼80%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
22 fps ∼37% -54%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
31 fps ∼52% -35%
Wiko WIM
23 fps ∼38% -52%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
31 fps ∼52% -35%
OnePlus 5T
60 fps ∼100% +25%
Samsung Galaxy S8
60 fps ∼100% +25%
Huawei P20 Pro
60 fps ∼100% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (48 - 52, n=4)
49.8 fps ∼83% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=505)
23.5 fps ∼39% -51%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
23 fps ∼37%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
9.9 fps ∼16% -57%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
14 fps ∼23% -39%
Wiko WIM
10 fps ∼16% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
16 fps ∼26% -30%
OnePlus 5T
60 fps ∼97% +161%
Samsung Galaxy S8
62 fps ∼100% +170%
Huawei P20 Pro
61 fps ∼98% +165%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (21 - 23, n=4)
22.5 fps ∼36% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88.2, n=425)
14.4 fps ∼23% -37%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
22 fps ∼41%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
9.5 fps ∼18% -57%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
15 fps ∼28% -32%
Wiko WIM
10 fps ∼19% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
15 fps ∼28% -32%
OnePlus 5T
53 fps ∼98% +141%
Samsung Galaxy S8
41 fps ∼76% +86%
Huawei P20 Pro
54 fps ∼100% +145%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (21 - 23, n=4)
22 fps ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=427)
14.5 fps ∼27% -34%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
14 fps ∼34%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
6.4 fps ∼16% -54%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
5.2 fps ∼13% -63%
Wiko WIM
6.4 fps ∼16% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
9.9 fps ∼24% -29%
OnePlus 5T
41 fps ∼100% +193%
Samsung Galaxy S8
24 fps ∼59% +71%
Huawei P20 Pro
39 fps ∼95% +179%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (13 - 15, n=4)
14.3 fps ∼35% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 60, n=288)
12.5 fps ∼30% -11%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
15 fps ∼41%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
6.5 fps ∼18% -57%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
11 fps ∼30% -27%
Wiko WIM
6.4 fps ∼17% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
9.6 fps ∼26% -36%
OnePlus 5T
37 fps ∼100% +147%
Samsung Galaxy S8
23 fps ∼62% +53%
Huawei P20 Pro
36 fps ∼97% +140%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (12 - 15, n=5)
14 fps ∼38% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (2.5 - 110, n=290)
12.6 fps ∼34% -16%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
8.3 fps ∼33%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
3.5 fps ∼14% -58%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
5.5 fps ∼22% -34%
Wiko WIM
3.8 fps ∼15% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
6 fps ∼24% -28%
OnePlus 5T
25 fps ∼100% +201%
Samsung Galaxy S8
25 fps ∼100% +201%
Huawei P20 Pro
23 fps ∼92% +177%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8.3 - 9.1, n=4)
8.85 fps ∼35% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (0.76 - 35, n=219)
8.51 fps ∼34% +3%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
9.1 fps ∼40%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
3.5 fps ∼15% -62%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
6 fps ∼26% -34%
Wiko WIM
3.5 fps ∼15% -62%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5.8 fps ∼25% -36%
OnePlus 5T
23 fps ∼100% +153%
Samsung Galaxy S8
13 fps ∼57% +43%
Huawei P20 Pro
22 fps ∼96% +142%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8.6 - 9.8, n=5)
8.94 fps ∼39% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 50, n=222)
7.82 fps ∼34% -14%

Legend

 
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Wiko WIM Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 5T Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
66.477 Points ∼100% +23%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
65.846 Points ∼99% +22%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
58.255 Points ∼88% +8%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
53.89 Points ∼81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (49.4 - 53.9, n=4)
52.2 Points ∼79% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
49.07 Points ∼74% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (11.4 - 224, n=360)
33.7 Points ∼51% -37%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65)
28.107 Points ∼42% -48%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL (Chrome 64)
27.556 Points ∼41% -49%
Wiko WIM (Chrome Version 59)
26.965 Points ∼41% -50%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
12941 Points ∼100% +18%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
12509 Points ∼97% +14%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
11584 Points ∼90% +6%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
10945 Points ∼85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (9582 - 10945, n=5)
10068 Points ∼78% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
9350 Points ∼72% -15%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65)
5052 Points ∼39% -54%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=496)
5011 Points ∼39% -54%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL (Chrome 64)
4786 Points ∼37% -56%
Wiko WIM (Chrome Version 59)
4625 Points ∼36% -58%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=515)
11883 ms * ∼100% -202%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65)
9823.3 ms * ∼83% -149%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL (Chrome 64)
9564.3 ms * ∼80% -143%
Wiko WIM (Chrome Version 59)
8781.2 ms * ∼74% -123%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
4275.2 ms * ∼36% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (3927 - 4769, n=4)
4182 ms * ∼35% -6%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
3937.3 ms * ∼33%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
3852.2 ms * ∼32% +2%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
3096 ms * ∼26% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
1886.6 ms * ∼16% +52%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
194 Points ∼100% +15%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
182 Points ∼94% +8%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
181 Points ∼93% +8%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
168 Points ∼87%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (159 - 173, n=3)
167 Points ∼86% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
156 Points ∼80% -7%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65)
110 Points ∼57% -35%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=246)
99.4 Points ∼51% -41%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
69 Points ∼100% +10%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
63 Points ∼91%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (58 - 63, n=3)
60.7 Points ∼88% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 130, n=35)
54 Points ∼78% -14%

* ... smaller is better

Nokia 7 PlusAsus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KLSony Xperia XA2 UltraWiko WIMSamsung Galaxy A8 2018OnePlus 5TSamsung Galaxy S8Huawei P20 ProAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-16%
-7%
-17%
-4%
75%
41%
267%
-16%
-36%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.31
72.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
16%
63.31 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
61.4
-1%
62.29 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
53.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-14%
51.9 (19.6 - 74.7, n=49)
-17%
43.8 (6.38 - 87.1, n=270)
-30%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82.21
83.88 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
85.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
83.8
2%
77.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
63.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-22%
70.2 (21.1 - 86.9, n=49)
-15%
62.1 (10.8 - 96.5, n=270)
-24%
Random Write 4KB
19.62
12
-39%
10.1
-49%
13.34
-32%
14.69
-25%
20
2%
15.25
-22%
160.49
718%
15.4 (3.4 - 71.1, n=57)
-22%
13.5 (0.14 - 164, n=549)
-31%
Random Read 4KB
54.65
36.8
-33%
76
39%
38.1
-30%
82.62
51%
138.1
153%
127.17
133%
144.33
164%
48.1 (11.4 - 149, n=57)
-12%
34.5 (1.59 - 173, n=549)
-37%
Sequential Write 256KB
211.6
139.5
-34%
138.8
-34%
136.67
-35%
104.2
-51%
203.4
-4%
193.23
-9%
196.69
-7%
160 (40 - 216, n=57)
-24%
71.7 (2.99 - 228, n=549)
-66%
Sequential Read 256KB
283.12
269.3
-5%
273.7
-3%
272.08
-4%
299.94
6%
698.7
147%
792.86
180%
831.82
194%
266 (115 - 704, n=57)
-6%
211 (12.1 - 832, n=549)
-25%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high29 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
World of Tanks Blitz
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high, 0xAA, 0xAF30 fps
Carga Máxima
 39.6 °C39.2 °C35.6 °C 
 38.3 °C37.1 °C38.2 °C 
 36.9 °C37 °C35.4 °C 
Máximo: 39.6 °C
Médio: 37.5 °C
34.4 °C37.3 °C38.7 °C
35.6 °C36.3 °C38.3 °C
35.5 °C37 °C37.4 °C
Máximo: 38.7 °C
Médio: 36.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  29.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.244.42532.941.73137.232.54031.737.35039.641.86328.335.88027.335.910026.934.112526.7361602439.920020.944.825020.952.231519.550.140018.554.150017.564.863017.561.880015.769.2100015.873.8125016.675.1160015.874.1200015.474.1250015.574.731501675.9400015.87450001672.2630016.374.3800016.371.91000016.268.21250016.456.41600016.452.1SPL28.685.3N1.161.3median 16.4Nokia 7 Plusmedian 68.2Delta2.111.935.245.132.940.337.238.231.741.739.642.728.327.327.32926.92726.730.32437.620.942.820.951.919.555.518.560.717.564.617.567.915.769.515.872.316.670.115.872.215.470.815.573.11674.615.876.81670.216.373.716.376.616.273.716.465.716.454.328.6851.162.6median 16.4Samsung Galaxy A8 2018median 69.52.110.2hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nokia 7 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.13 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.65 / 1.76 / 1.78 Watt
Carga midlight 4.47 / 9.13 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
3580 mAh
Wiko WIM
3200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3000 mAh
OnePlus 5T
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8
3000 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
36%
-6%
21%
25%
16%
21%
23%
2%
2%
Idle Minimum *
0.65
0.58
11%
0.77
-18%
0.93
-43%
0.67
-3%
0.58
11%
0.78
-20%
0.84
-29%
0.623 (0.56 - 0.65, n=4)
4%
0.866 (0.2 - 3.4, n=576)
-33%
Idle Average *
1.76
1.31
26%
2.12
-20%
1.28
27%
1.02
42%
1.44
18%
1.1
37%
1.54
12%
1.843 (1.51 - 2.16, n=4)
-5%
1.697 (0.6 - 6.2, n=575)
4%
Idle Maximum *
1.78
1.33
25%
2.17
-22%
1.37
23%
1.1
38%
1.53
14%
1.16
35%
1.57
12%
1.868 (1.54 - 2.18, n=4)
-5%
1.945 (0.74 - 6.6, n=576)
-9%
Load Average *
4.47
1.88
58%
4.3
4%
2.39
47%
3.86
14%
3.17
29%
4.15
7%
2.47
45%
4.39 (3.94 - 4.65, n=4)
2%
3.97 (0.8 - 10.8, n=570)
11%
Load Maximum *
9.13
3.8
58%
6.73
26%
4.25
53%
5.97
35%
8.54
6%
5.12
44%
2.49
73%
7.7 (5.93 - 9.13, n=4)
16%
5.6 (1.2 - 14.2, n=570)
39%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
28h 23min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 12min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 46min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 38min
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
3580 mAh
Wiko WIM
3200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3000 mAh
OnePlus 5T
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8
3000 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-3%
27%
-27%
20%
22%
20%
35%
Reader / Idle
1703
1788
5%
1546
-9%
1754
3%
1667
-2%
1727
1%
H.264
706
876
24%
908
29%
799
13%
771
9%
784
11%
WiFi v1.3
672
654
-3%
849
26%
492
-27%
646
-4%
718
7%
719
7%
744
11%
Load
158
238
51%
260
65%
257
63%
264
67%
345
118%

Pro

+ Qualidade de construção
+ Tela
+ Android One
+ Desempenho
+ Duração da bateria

Contra

- Alto-falante
- Ergonomia
- Memória eMMC
- Somente LTE Cat. 6
In review: Nokia 7 Plus. Review device provided courtesy of: HMD Global Germany.
In review: Nokia 7 Plus. Review device provided courtesy of: HMD Global Germany.

Com o Nokia 7 Plus, a fabricante finlandesa HMD Global oferece um pacote muito interessante, na faixa de preços de 360-400 Euros (~$424-471). Especialmente, porque o smartphone vem através do Programa Android One e, portanto, é garantido que receberá atualizações de segurança e de software ainda durante um longo tempo.

O Nokia 7 Plus se vê e se sente muito bem. Dito isto, não achamos que a escolha de materiais para a parte traseira do dispositivo seja 100% impressionante. Além disso, os lados do smartphone se sentem angulares e desajeitados na mão.

A tela, a câmera e o SoC são bastante competitivos para um dispositivo de 400 euros (~$471). No entanto, se você está disposto a gastar cerca de 50/100 Euros (~ $58-117) a mais, então você poderá obter o Samsung Galaxy S8, que conta com uma tela muito melhor e um SoC mais rápido. A duração da bateria é muito boa no momento do lançamento, mas ainda há espaço para melhorias.

Desde que as quedas de preços pós-lançamento habituais ocorram, o Nokia 7 Plus oferece uma combinação muito interessante de hardware e software. Os potenciais compradores que procuram um smartphone de gama média devem dar uma olhada mais de perto no Nokia 7 Plus.       

Nokia 7 Plus - 05/11/2018 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento
90%
Teclado
69 / 75 → 92%
Mouse
93%
Conectividade
49 / 60 → 82%
Peso
89%
Bateria
94%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
60 / 63 → 95%
Desempenho da aplicação
61 / 70 → 87%
Temperatura
91%
Ruído
100%
Audio
63 / 91 → 69%
Camera
75%
Médio
79%
87%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 7 Plus
Marcus Herbrich, 2018-05-23 (Update: 2018-06- 2)