Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 7 Plus
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 458 cd/m²
Contraste: 2082:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.19
| Nokia 7 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6.00 | Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.50 | Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra IPS, 1920x1080, 6.00 | Wiko WIM AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.50 | Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 5.60 | OnePlus 5T AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6.01 | Samsung Galaxy S8 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.80 | Huawei P20 Pro OLED, 2240x1080, 6.10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -25% | -4% | -28% | 7% | 22% | 24% | 43% | |
| Brightness middle | 458 | 456 0% | 659 44% | 344 -25% | 541 18% | 425 -7% | 566 24% | 569 24% |
| Brightness | 463 | 455 -2% | 680 47% | 353 -24% | 538 16% | 423 -9% | 564 22% | 578 25% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 85 -8% | 88 -4% | 90 -2% | 96 4% | 92 0% | 94 2% | 95 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.56 -155% | ||||||
| Contrast | 2082 | 1177 -43% | ||||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4 | 5.6 -40% | 2.8 30% | 5.7 -43% | 5.8 -45% | 2.1 47% | 2.7 32% | 1.3 67% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.4 | 11.1 -50% | 6.5 12% | 12.2 -65% | 3.4 54% | 5.4 27% | 2.1 72% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 6.9 -47% | 3 36% | 5.1 -9% | 2.7 43% | 2.5 47% | 3.1 34% | 1.6 66% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.3 96% | 2.18 101% | 2.73 81% | 2.07 106% | 2.32 95% | 2.15 102% | 2.31 95% |
| CCT | 7425 88% | 7883 82% | 6938 94% | 7407 88% | 6570 99% | 6455 101% | 6335 103% | 6401 102% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 81.57 | |||||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.87 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 43.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (45.3 - 55.5, n=12) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL (Chrome 64) | |
| Wiko WIM (Chrome Version 59) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8463 - 10945, n=14) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL (Chrome 64) | |
| Wiko WIM (Chrome Version 59) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL (Chrome 64) | |
| Wiko WIM (Chrome Version 59) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (3796 - 4769, n=13) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (159 - 182, n=8) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (47 - 63, n=9) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Nokia 7 Plus | Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL | Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra | Wiko WIM | Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 | OnePlus 5T | Samsung Galaxy S8 | Huawei P20 Pro | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -16% | -7% | -17% | -4% | 74% | 41% | 267% | 6% | 623% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 283.1 | 269.3 -5% | 273.7 -3% | 272.1 -4% | 299.9 6% | 699 147% | 793 180% | 832 194% | 273 ? -4% | 1505 ? 432% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 211.6 | 139.5 -34% | 138.8 -34% | 136.7 -35% | 104.2 -51% | 203.4 -4% | 193.2 -9% | 196.7 -7% | 176.8 ? -16% | 1112 ? 426% |
| Random Read 4KB | 54.7 | 36.8 -33% | 76 39% | 38.1 -30% | 82.6 51% | 138.1 152% | 127.2 133% | 144.3 164% | 59.1 ? 8% | 247 ? 352% |
| Random Write 4KB | 19.62 | 12 -39% | 10.1 -49% | 13.34 -32% | 14.69 -25% | 20 2% | 15.25 -22% | 160.5 718% | 31.7 ? 62% | 271 ? 1281% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 82.2 | 83.9 ? 2% | 85.9 ? 5% | 83.8 2% | 77.9 ? -5% | 63.9 ? -22% | 77.4 ? -6% | |||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 62.3 | 72.1 ? 16% | 63.3 ? 2% | 61.4 -1% | 62.3 ? 0% | 53.5 ? -14% | 58.3 ? -6% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 29 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| World of Tanks Blitz | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high, 0xAA, 0xAF | 30 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Nokia 7 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0 / 0.13 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.65 / 1.76 / 1.78 Watt |
| Carga |
4.47 / 9.13 Watt |
    
| |
| Nokia 7 Plus 3800 mAh | Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra 3580 mAh | Wiko WIM 3200 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 3000 mAh | OnePlus 5T 3300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 3000 mAh | Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 36% | -6% | 21% | 25% | 16% | 21% | 23% | -37% | -6% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.65 | 0.58 11% | 0.77 -18% | 0.93 -43% | 0.67 -3% | 0.58 11% | 0.78 -20% | 0.84 -29% | 1.052 ? -62% | 0.897 ? -38% |
| Idle Average * | 1.76 | 1.31 26% | 2.12 -20% | 1.28 27% | 1.02 42% | 1.44 18% | 1.1 37% | 1.54 12% | 2.62 ? -49% | 1.452 ? 17% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.78 | 1.33 25% | 2.17 -22% | 1.37 23% | 1.1 38% | 1.53 14% | 1.16 35% | 1.57 12% | 2.88 ? -62% | 1.629 ? 8% |
| Load Average * | 4.47 | 1.88 58% | 4.3 4% | 2.39 47% | 3.86 14% | 3.17 29% | 4.15 7% | 2.47 45% | 5.1 ? -14% | 5.55 ? -24% |
| Load Maximum * | 9.13 | 3.8 58% | 6.73 26% | 4.25 53% | 5.97 35% | 8.54 6% | 5.12 44% | 2.49 73% | 9.08 ? 1% | 8.31 ? 9% |
* ... smaller is better
| Nokia 7 Plus 3800 mAh | Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra 3580 mAh | Wiko WIM 3200 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 3000 mAh | OnePlus 5T 3300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 3000 mAh | Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -3% | 27% | -27% | 20% | 22% | 20% | 35% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1703 | 1788 5% | 1546 -9% | 1754 3% | 1667 -2% | 1727 1% | ||
| H.264 | 706 | 876 24% | 908 29% | 799 13% | 771 9% | 784 11% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 672 | 654 -3% | 849 26% | 492 -27% | 646 -4% | 718 7% | 719 7% | 744 11% |
| Load | 158 | 238 51% | 260 65% | 257 63% | 264 67% | 345 118% |
Pro
Contra
Com o Nokia 7 Plus, a fabricante finlandesa HMD Global oferece um pacote muito interessante, na faixa de preços de 360-400 Euros (~$424-471). Especialmente, porque o smartphone vem através do Programa Android One e, portanto, é garantido que receberá atualizações de segurança e de software ainda durante um longo tempo.
O Nokia 7 Plus se vê e se sente muito bem. Dito isto, não achamos que a escolha de materiais para a parte traseira do dispositivo seja 100% impressionante. Além disso, os lados do smartphone se sentem angulares e desajeitados na mão.
A tela, a câmera e o SoC são bastante competitivos para um dispositivo de 400 euros (~$471). No entanto, se você está disposto a gastar cerca de 50/100 Euros (~ $58-117) a mais, então você poderá obter o Samsung Galaxy S8, que conta com uma tela muito melhor e um SoC mais rápido. A duração da bateria é muito boa no momento do lançamento, mas ainda há espaço para melhorias.
Desde que as quedas de preços pós-lançamento habituais ocorram, o Nokia 7 Plus oferece uma combinação muito interessante de hardware e software. Os potenciais compradores que procuram um smartphone de gama média devem dar uma olhada mais de perto no Nokia 7 Plus.
Nokia 7 Plus
-
11/04/2019 v7
Marcus Herbrich