Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Razer Phone 2017

Florian Wimmer (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 04/02/2018

O telefone para jogos. Jogos a 120 frames! Não há mais travamentos! O sonho de muitos jogadores pode ter se tornado realidade com o lançamento do Razer Phone 2017. A nossa análise vai revelar se este smartphone é feito apenas com os jogadores em mente e como funciona nos cenários da vida real.

Razer Phone 2017
Placa gráfica
Memória
8192 MB 
, LPDDR4, 1,600 MHz
Pantalha
5.72 polegadas 16:9, 1440 x 2560 pixel 513 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IGZO LCD, 120 Hz, Wide Color Gamut, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 48.9 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: Saída de áudio via USB-C, Card Reader: microSD (class 10, 2TB máx.), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, giroscópio, proximidade, bússola
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM: quad-band GSM; UMTS: B1/2/3/4/5/8; LTE: B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/19/20/25/26/28/29/30/66; TDD LTE: B38/39/40/41; TD-SCDMA: B34/39, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8 x 158.5 x 77.7
Bateria
15.2 Wh, 4000 mAh Lítio-Ion, Qualcomm QuickCharge 4.0+
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix câmera dupla: 12MP AF f1.75 wide, 12MP AF f2.6 zoom, dual PDAF, dual tone, dual LED flash
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix FF f2.0, Videos @1080p/30fps
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo frontais, Dual Amplifiers, Adaptador de Áudio com DAC com certificação THX, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Adaptador de áudio Type-C para 3,5mm, fonte de alimentação, cabo USB-C, ferramenta SIM, Game Booster, Dolby Atmos, Nova Launcher, 24 Meses Garantia, taxa de dados: até 600 Mbps (downstream) / 100 Mbps (upstream). SAR 0.35 W/kg (head), 0.68 W/kg (body), fanless
peso
197 g, Suprimento de energia: 94 g
Preço
749 Euro

 

Razer Phone
Razer Phone
Razer Phone
Razer Phone
Razer Phone
Razer Phone
Razer Phone
Razer Phone
Razer Phone

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
914 MBit/s ∼100% +37%
Razer Phone 2017
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
665 MBit/s ∼73%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
386 MBit/s ∼42% -42%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
368 MBit/s ∼40% -45%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
338 MBit/s ∼37% -49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (of 178, min: 237, max: 939)
201 MBit/s ∼22% -70%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Phone 2017
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
661 MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
656 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
374 MBit/s ∼57% -43%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
225 MBit/s ∼34% -66%
Average of class Smartphone
  (of 178, min: 237, max: 703)
191 MBit/s ∼29% -71%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – woods
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – woods
GPS Razer Phone – overview
GPS Razer Phone – overview
GPS Razer Phone – bridge
GPS Razer Phone – bridge
GPS Razer Phone – woods
GPS Razer Phone – woods

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
405
cd/m²
434
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
436
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
399
cd/m²
424
cd/m²
401
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 436 cd/m² Médio: 417.2 cd/m² Minimum: 8.6 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 436 cd/m²
Contraste: 2725:1 (Preto: 0.16 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.88 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
97.9% sRGB (Calman)
Gamma: 2.45
Razer Phone 2017
IGZO LCD, 120 Hz, Wide Color Gamut, 1440x2560, 5.72
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
OnePlus 5T
AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6.01
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
OLED, 2160x1080, 6
Screen
9%
26%
42%
45%
Brightness middle
436
559
28%
425
-3%
560
28%
629
44%
Brightness
417
538
29%
423
1%
562
35%
636
53%
Brightness Distribution
92
90
-2%
92
0%
93
1%
94
2%
Black Level *
0.16
0.38
-138%
Contrast
2725
1471
-46%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.88
1.3
66%
2.1
46%
1.7
56%
1.7
56%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.96
2.7
66%
3.4
57%
3.4
57%
3.6
55%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.8
1.8
69%
2.5
57%
1.6
72%
2.4
59%
Gamma
2.45 98%
2.25 107%
2.32 103%
2.13 113%
2.15 112%
CCT
7657 85%
6797 96%
6455 101%
6435 101%
6337 103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
81.57
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.87

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9986 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
19 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12 ms rise
↘ 7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.1 ms).
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2017
7046 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 5T
6595 Points ∼94% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5195 Points ∼74% -26%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6932 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 17, min: 5603, max: 7223)
6696 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (of 138, min: 2152, max: 8069)
4428 Points ∼63% -37%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2017
7968 Points ∼94%
OnePlus 5T
7739 Points ∼92% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5830 Points ∼69% -27%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8439 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 17, min: 6854, max: 8553)
7865 Points ∼93% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (of 304, min: 1908, max: 9319)
4547 Points ∼54% -43%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2017
1225 Points ∼92%
OnePlus 5T
1329 Points ∼100% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1163 Points ∼88% -5%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1234 Points ∼93% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 15, min: 1009, max: 1329)
1223 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (of 378, min: 9, max: 1682)
664 Points ∼50% -46%
Graphics (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2017
6273 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 5T
6100 Points ∼97% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6126 Points ∼98% -2%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3657 Points ∼58% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 15, min: 5791, max: 6273)
6048 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (of 378, min: 65, max: 9248)
1464 Points ∼23% -77%
Memory (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2017
4085 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 5T
3845 Points ∼93% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3135 Points ∼76% -23%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4142 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 15, min: 1501, max: 4423)
3151 Points ∼76% -23%
Average of class Smartphone (of 378, min: 21, max: 4423)
1066 Points ∼26% -74%
System (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2017
5660 Points ∼96%
OnePlus 5T
5872 Points ∼100% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5319 Points ∼91% -6%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
5244 Points ∼89% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 15, min: 4238, max: 5926)
5687 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (of 378, min: 369, max: 10281)
2102 Points ∼36% -63%
Overall (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2017
3651 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 5T
3678 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3301 Points ∼90% -10%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3147 Points ∼86% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 15, min: 2702, max: 3790)
3368 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (of 381, min: 1, max: 3790)
1085 Points ∼29% -70%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2017
7931 Points ∼93%
OnePlus 5T
8000 Points ∼93% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
8295 Points ∼97% +5%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8572 Points ∼100% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 11, min: 7462, max: 8281)
7893 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (of 86, min: 912, max: 14362)
4159 Points ∼49% -48%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2017
6742 Points ∼64%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
10558 Points ∼100% +57%
OnePlus 5T
6670 Points ∼63% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6695 Points ∼63% -1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6792 Points ∼64% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 16, min: 6006, max: 6799)
6506 Points ∼62% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (of 125, min: 944, max: 10558)
4146 Points ∼39% -39%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2017
1942 Points ∼46%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
4263 Points ∼100% +120%
OnePlus 5T
1962 Points ∼46% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2015 Points ∼47% +4%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1898 Points ∼45% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 16, min: 1809, max: 1973)
1916 Points ∼45% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (of 126, min: 390, max: 4265)
1249 Points ∼29% -36%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2017
3157 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2109 Points ∼67% -33%
OnePlus 5T
3068 Points ∼97% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2466 Points ∼78% -22%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2871 Points ∼91% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 16, min: 1628, max: 3157)
2884 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (of 230, min: 536, max: 3630)
1521 Points ∼48% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2017
4049 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
3069 Points ∼76% -24%
OnePlus 5T
4016 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3479 Points ∼86% -14%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2844 Points ∼70% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 16, min: 3560, max: 4072)
3913 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (of 230, min: 54, max: 5122)
1059 Points ∼26% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2017
3810 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2781 Points ∼73% -27%
OnePlus 5T
3758 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3188 Points ∼84% -16%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2850 Points ∼75% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 16, min: 2895, max: 3810)
3614 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (of 238, min: 69, max: 4693)
1007 Points ∼26% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2017
3092 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 5T
3031 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2465 Points ∼80% -20%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2896 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 15, min: 1574, max: 3092)
2818 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (of 259, min: 293, max: 3642)
1406 Points ∼45% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2017
6127 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 5T
5791 Points ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
4786 Points ∼78% -22%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3353 Points ∼55% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 15, min: 4765, max: 6231)
5818 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (of 259, min: 43, max: 8122)
1409 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2017
5030 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 5T
4816 Points ∼96% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3958 Points ∼79% -21%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3239 Points ∼64% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 15, min: 3407, max: 5030)
4685 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (of 267, min: 55, max: 6378)
1201 Points ∼24% -76%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2017
21521 Points ∼84%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
25641 Points ∼100% +19%
OnePlus 5T
21348 Points ∼83% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
20892 Points ∼81% -3%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22629 Points ∼88% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 18, min: 6729, max: 23046)
19082 Points ∼74% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (of 414, min: 7150, max: 35856)
11837 Points ∼46% -45%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2017
58360 Points ∼51%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
113380 Points ∼100% +94%
OnePlus 5T
58097 Points ∼51% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
33077 Points ∼29% -43%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
34008 Points ∼30% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 18, min: 16794, max: 58360)
53397 Points ∼47% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (of 414, min: 4150, max: 113380)
14910 Points ∼13% -74%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2017
42278 Points ∼66%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
64405 Points ∼100% +52%
OnePlus 5T
42022 Points ∼65% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
29282 Points ∼45% -31%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
30590 Points ∼47% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 18, min: 12604, max: 42278)
37601 Points ∼58% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (of 415, min: 4577, max: 64405)
12891 Points ∼20% -70%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2017
117 fps ∼70%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
166.9 fps ∼100% +43%
OnePlus 5T
113 fps ∼68% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
104 fps ∼62% -11%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
112 fps ∼67% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 16, min: 91, max: 119)
109 fps ∼65% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (of 439, min: 11, max: 177)
25.8 fps ∼15% -78%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2017
79 fps ∼66%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
119.4 fps ∼100% +51%
OnePlus 5T
60 fps ∼50% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
58 fps ∼49% -27%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
60 fps ∼50% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 17, min: 54, max: 79)
60.4 fps ∼51% -24%
Average of class Smartphone (of 442, min: 14, max: 120)
22.9 fps ∼19% -71%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2017
43 fps ∼61%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
71 fps ∼100% +65%
OnePlus 5T
60 fps ∼85% +40%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
50 fps ∼70% +16%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
54 fps ∼76% +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 17, min: 43, max: 64)
55 fps ∼77% +28%
Average of class Smartphone (of 364, min: 1.6, max: 88.2)
13.8 fps ∼19% -68%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2017
40 fps ∼51%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
79.2 fps ∼100% +98%
OnePlus 5T
53 fps ∼67% +33%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
38 fps ∼48% -5%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
56 fps ∼71% +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 17, min: 29, max: 58)
43 fps ∼54% +8%
Average of class Smartphone (of 366, min: 4.4, max: 115)
14 fps ∼18% -65%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2017
21 fps ∼43%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
49 fps ∼100% +133%
OnePlus 5T
41 fps ∼84% +95%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
42 fps ∼86% +100%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
37 fps ∼76% +76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 17, min: 21, max: 43)
37.5 fps ∼77% +79%
Average of class Smartphone (of 230, min: 2.4, max: 60)
12.5 fps ∼26% -40%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2017
22 fps ∼39%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
56.4 fps ∼100% +156%
OnePlus 5T
37 fps ∼66% +68%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
23 fps ∼41% +5%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
38 fps ∼67% +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 17, min: 15, max: 59)
29.8 fps ∼53% +35%
Average of class Smartphone (of 232, min: 4.8, max: 110)
12.4 fps ∼22% -44%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2017
25 fps ∼100%
OnePlus 5T
25 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
25 fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
21 fps ∼84% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 17, min: 22, max: 26)
24.4 fps ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (of 163, min: 2.7, max: 35)
8.71 fps ∼35% -65%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2017
15 fps ∼65%
OnePlus 5T
23 fps ∼100% +53%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
13 fps ∼57% -13%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22 fps ∼96% +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 17, min: 11, max: 50)
20.2 fps ∼88% +35%
Average of class Smartphone (of 166, min: 2.7, max: 50)
7.74 fps ∼34% -48%
AnTuTu v7
MEM (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2017
9171 Points ∼67%
OnePlus 5T
9027 Points ∼66% -2%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
13626 Points ∼100% +49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 6, min: 8474, max: 16148)
10047 Points ∼74% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (of 48, min: 3593, max: 16148)
7034 Points ∼52% -23%
UX (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2017
42483 Points ∼91%
OnePlus 5T
46549 Points ∼100% +10%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
44584 Points ∼96% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 6, min: 42180, max: 46549)
43586 Points ∼94% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (of 48, min: 11411, max: 57538)
28669 Points ∼62% -33%
GPU (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2017
84560 Points ∼98%
OnePlus 5T
85868 Points ∼100% +2%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
81761 Points ∼95% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 6, min: 80946, max: 85868)
83654 Points ∼97% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (of 48, min: 1132, max: 106371)
34787 Points ∼41% -59%
CPU (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2017
72758 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 5T
73371 Points ∼100% +1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
72307 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 6, min: 70234, max: 73371)
72358 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (of 48, min: 12553, max: 94648)
44985 Points ∼61% -38%
Total Score (sort by value)
Razer Phone 2017
208972 Points ∼97%
OnePlus 5T
214815 Points ∼100% +3%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
212278 Points ∼99% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 6, min: 204457, max: 217442)
209645 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (of 48, min: 32557, max: 266981)
115683 Points ∼54% -45%

Legend

 
Razer Phone 2017 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 8 Plus Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
 
OnePlus 5T Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei Mate 10 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
223.5 Points ∼100% +253%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
66.477 Points ∼30% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 17, min: 52.9, max: 80.4)
66.4 Points ∼30% +5%
Razer Phone 2017 (Chrome 65)
63.3 Points ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
62.198 Points ∼28% -2%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
56.63 Points ∼25% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (of 295, min: 10, max: 224)
34.6 Points ∼15% -45%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
35209 Points ∼100% +179%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
14050 Points ∼40% +12%
Razer Phone 2017 (Chrome 65)
12600 Points ∼36%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
12509 Points ∼36% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 18, min: 3086, max: 14300)
11096 Points ∼32% -12%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
10406 Points ∼30% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (of 431, min: 1506, max: 35255)
4900 Points ∼14% -61%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (of 450, min: 718, max: 59466)
11988 ms * ∼100% -245%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
3590.6 ms * ∼30% -3%
Razer Phone 2017 (Chrome 65)
3476 ms * ∼29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (of 17, min: 2425, max: 4136)
3159 ms * ∼26% +9%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
3096 ms * ∼26% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
2236.7 ms * ∼19% +36%
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
719.7 ms * ∼6% +79%

* ... smaller is better

Razer Phone 2017OnePlus 5TSamsung Galaxy S8 PlusHuawei Mate 10 ProAverage 64 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
8%
-0%
262%
24%
-48%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
52.5
57.24 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
9%
49.5 (of 16, min: 29.5, max: 67.2)
-6%
40.7 (of 214, min: 8.29, max: 87.1)
-22%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
79.4
71.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-10%
66.8 (of 16, min: 34.3, max: 80.6)
-16%
59.1 (of 214, min: 13.5, max: 96.5)
-26%
Random Write 4KB
14.3
20
40%
15.27
7%
164.45
1050%
39.6 (of 21, min: 8.77, max: 152)
177%
11.7 (of 484, min: 0.14, max: 164)
-18%
Random Read 4KB
142.5
138.1
-3%
127.18
-11%
132.27
-7%
137 (of 21, min: 78.2, max: 173)
-4%
31.4 (of 484, min: 1.59, max: 173)
-78%
Sequential Write 256KB
202.5
203.4
0%
194.18
-4%
208.72
3%
194 (of 21, min: 133, max: 214)
-4%
64 (of 484, min: 2.99, max: 215)
-68%
Sequential Read 256KB
732.3
698.7
-5%
787.6
8%
732.46
0%
726 (of 21, min: 529, max: 819)
-1%
196 (of 484, min: 12.1, max: 832)
-73%
Arena of Valor
Razer Phone 2017
min
62 (min: 50) fps ∼100%
high HD
61 (min: 23) fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S9
high HD
59 fps ∼97%
Battle Bay
Razer Phone 2017
half resolution
121 (min: 121) fps ∼100%
full resolution
121 (min: 116) fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S9
full resolution
60 fps ∼50%
Shadow Fight 3
Razer Phone 2017
high
60 (min: 55) fps ∼100%
minimal
30 (min: 27) fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S9
high
59 fps ∼98%
World of Tanks Blitz
Razer Phone 2017
low AA:0x AF:0x
91 (min: 85) fps ∼100%
high AA:0x AF:0x
91 (min: 66) fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S9
high AA:0x AF:0x
60 (min: 57) fps ∼66%

Legend

 
Razer Phone 2017 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Shadow Fight 3
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high60 fps
 minimal30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Battle Bay
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 half resolution121 fps
 full resolution121 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Arena of Valor
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 min62 fps
 high HD61 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
World of Tanks Blitz
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 low, 0xAA, 0xAF91 fps
 high, 0xAA, 0xAF91 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Carga Máxima
 31.1 °C30.1 °C30.3 °C 
 32 °C30.5 °C32.7 °C 
 31.6 °C30.5 °C31.7 °C 
Máximo: 32.7 °C
Médio: 31.2 °C
31.1 °C32.1 °C32.8 °C
31.3 °C32 °C31.9 °C
31.3 °C32.3 °C32.8 °C
Máximo: 32.8 °C
Médio: 32 °C
alimentação elétrica  31.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.525.929.52526.427.726.43126.526.526.54026.628.326.65025.525.225.56323.922.723.98026.523.626.510033.623.333.612540.230.540.216045.821.145.820052.420.652.425055.322.955.331557.921.157.940060.921.560.950064.822.364.863069.117.569.180071.520.171.5100069.719.969.712507018.270160069.51669.5200070.715.770.7250071.614.871.6315069.614.569.6400066.914.266.95000681468630067.813.867.8800068.913.968.91000066.51466.51250062.71462.71600058.613.858.6SPL81.229.381.2N51.51.251.5median 66.9Razer Phone 2017median 17.5median 66.9Delta7.13.57.131.633.925.429.825.32632.928.833.627.631.627.328.425.72730.320.834.22241.121.349.220.855.321.260.819.462.119.566.617.770.217.97217.873.417.373.617.474.416.773.317.274.118.273.217.969.817.666.917.769.617.863.817.953.818.15118.244.73082.91.356.6median 17.9Samsung Galaxy S8 Plusmedian 66.61.311hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Razer Phone 2017 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.15 / 0.21 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.83 / 2.11 / 2.24 Watt
Carga midlight 4.94 / 9.08 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Razer Phone 2017
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2691 mAh
OnePlus 5T
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
Power Consumption
1%
27%
32%
22%
Idle Minimum *
0.83
0.72
13%
0.58
30%
0.68
18%
0.85
-2%
Idle Average *
2.11
2.45
-16%
1.44
32%
1.13
46%
1.15
45%
Idle Maximum *
2.24
2.52
-13%
1.53
32%
1.16
48%
1.23
45%
Load Average *
4.94
3.84
22%
3.17
36%
4.69
5%
4.12
17%
Load Maximum *
9.08
9.02
1%
8.54
6%
5.24
42%
8.42
7%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 42min
Razer Phone 2017
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone 8 Plus
2691 mAh
OnePlus 5T
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-14%
-6%
-3%
7%
Reader / Idle
2085
1754
1565
1744
WiFi v1.3
762
657
-14%
718
-6%
736
-3%
818
7%
Load
211
257
275
398
H.264
733
799
742
929

Pro

+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Desempenho decente de jogos
+ Tela inovadora de alto contraste de 120 Hz
+ Boas câmeras
+ Bons alto falantes estéreo
+ Permanece suficientemente frio
+ Tela táctil precisa
+ Wi-Fi muito veloz
+ Muita RAM

Contra

- Nem todos os jogos e aplicativos suportam 120 Hz
- Sem headset incluído
- Sem conector de áudio de 3,5-mm
- Qualidade pobre das chamadas no fone de ouvido
- Alto consumo de energia
- Pesado
- Afogamento moderado sob uso intenso
In review: Razer Phone 2017. Review unit courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Razer Phone 2017. Review unit courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Antigamente, os jogadores ficavam trancados em seus quartos escuros até a chegada do Game Boy, o tataravô do Razer Phone. Hoje, o Razer Phone permite jogos em dispositivos móveis na estrada a 120 FPS com excelente som estéreo. A tela de alta resolução é brilhante o suficiente, a bateria dura o tempo suficiente, as câmeras estão no mesmo nível de outros smartphones de gama alta, e embora não seja particularmente barato, o Razer Phone ainda é consideravelmente mais barato do que o Samsung Galaxy S9 ou o iPhone 8.

O Razer Phone é um poderoso dispositivo de jogos de design conservador e de longa duração para a estrada.

As duas coisas que mais nos surpreenderam foram a falta do conector para fones de 3,5 mm e o fato de a Razer ter decidido não incluir um fone de ouvido na caixa. A qualidade das chamadas no fone de ouvido foi muito ruim, e o microfone distorceu nossas vozes muito rapidamente. O telefone também se afogou ligeiramente sob uso intenso. Tudo o que é muito minucioso, no final das contas, o Razer Phone é um telefone de alta qualidade por um preço justo, e certamente encontrará seu público não apenas entre os jogadores.

Razer Phone 2017 - 03/27/2018 v6
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
89%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
91%
Conectividade
49 / 60 → 81%
Peso
88%
Bateria
96%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
64 / 63 → 100%
Desempenho da aplicação
70 / 70 → 100%
Temperatura
93%
Ruído
100%
Audio
64 / 91 → 70%
Camera
83%
Médio
80%
88%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Razer Phone 2017
Florian Wimmer, 2018-04- 2 (Update: 2018-04- 8)