Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Mate 20

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 12/03/2018

Insider tip. O Huawei Mate 20 é em grande parte idêntico ao seu irmão de 200 euros (~$225) mais caro, o Mate 20 Pro. Continue lendo para descobrir se o Mate 20 vale o dinheiro e suas diferenças em relação ao Mate 20 Pro.

Huawei Mate 20 (Mate 20 Serie)
Processador
HiSilicon Kirin 980
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G76 MP10
Memória
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Pantalha
6.53 polegadas 18.7:9, 2244 x 1080 pixel 381 PPI, Capacitiva, 16,7 milhões de cores, espaço de cor DCI-P3, TFT LCD (IPS), Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 113.1 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões de memória nano de até 256 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Bússola, Sensor de digitais, Giroscópio, Hall, IR, Sensor de proximidade, detetor piroeléctrico, Colour temperature , USB Type-C OTG, DisplayPort, HDMI, LDAC, aptX, aptX HD
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G/GSM: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. 3G/UMTS: Bands 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19, 34, 39. 4G/LTE Cat.16: Bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41. SAR values: Head - 0.44 W/kg, Body - 0.99 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.3 x 158.2 x 77.2
Bateria
4000 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Tempo de conversação 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 38 h, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 31 h, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 629 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 632 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix Câmera tripa Leica: 12 MP wide-angle lens, f/1.8, 16 MP ultra-wide-angle lens, f/2.2, 8 MP telephoto lens, f/2.4). Autofocus Laser Focus, Phase Focus, Contrast Focus, AIS
Secondary Camera: 24 MPix , f/2.0
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Dois alto-falantes, Teclado: Virtual, Carregador de 22,5 W SuperCharge, cabo USB, fones, Ferramenta SIM, Guia de início rápido, EMUI 9, 24 Meses Garantia, IP53, fanless
peso
188 g, Suprimento de energia: 120 g
Preço
799 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
657 MBit/s ∼100% +30%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
629 (min: 621, max: 638) MBit/s ∼96% +24%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 (min: 532, max: 642) MBit/s ∼94% +21%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
491 (min: 100, max: 534) MBit/s ∼75% -3%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
579 MBit/s ∼88% +14%
Huawei Mate 20
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
507 (min: 496, max: 517) MBit/s ∼77%
Huawei Mate 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
305 MBit/s ∼46% -40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=303)
210 MBit/s ∼32% -59%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
703 MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
696 (min: 647, max: 714) MBit/s ∼99% +5%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
663 (min: 289, max: 805) MBit/s ∼94% 0%
Huawei Mate 20
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
663 (min: 565, max: 714) MBit/s ∼94%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
573 MBit/s ∼82% -14%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
474 (min: 241, max: 497) MBit/s ∼67% -29%
Huawei Mate 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
347 MBit/s ∼49% -48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=303)
205 MBit/s ∼29% -69%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø507 (496-517)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø663 (565-714)
GPS Test: Huawei Mate 20 - Overview
GPS Test: Huawei Mate 20 - Overview
GPS Test: Huawei Mate 20 – Cycling around a lake
GPS Test: Huawei Mate 20 – Cycling around a lake
GPS Test: Huawei Mate 20 - Loop
GPS Test: Huawei Mate 20 - Loop
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cycling around a lake
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cycling around a lake
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Loop
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Loop

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
Our test chart in detail
802
cd/m²
785
cd/m²
766
cd/m²
799
cd/m²
782
cd/m²
774
cd/m²
798
cd/m²
755
cd/m²
797
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 802 cd/m² Médio: 784.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.65 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 782 cd/m²
Contraste: 2172:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
97.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Huawei Mate 20
TFT-LCD (IPS), 2244x1080, 6.53
HTC U12 Plus
Super LCD 6, 2880x1440, 6
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
OLED, 3120x1440, 6.3
Huawei Mate 10
IPS, 2560x1440, 5.9
LG V30
OLED, 2880x1440, 6
OnePlus 6T
Optic AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Super AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.2
Screen
-3%
12%
4%
-54%
-5%
-26%
Brightness middle
782
395
-49%
576
-26%
704
-10%
432
-45%
437
-44%
429
-45%
Brightness
784
402
-49%
582
-26%
692
-12%
428
-45%
442
-44%
432
-45%
Brightness Distribution
94
90
-4%
90
-4%
94
0%
87
-7%
95
1%
88
-6%
Black Level *
0.36
0.37
-3%
0.28
22%
Contrast
2172
1068
-51%
2514
16%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.3
1.6
30%
1.3
43%
2.4
-4%
4.18
-82%
2.21
4%
3.39
-47%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7
3.4
51%
3.5
50%
4.2
40%
8.53
-22%
4.27
39%
5.25
25%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.4
1.1
54%
1.6
33%
2.8
-17%
5.3
-121%
2.1
12%
3.3
-38%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.14 103%
2.18 101%
2.34 94%
2.33 94%
2.307 95%
2.238 98%
CCT
6839 95%
6536 99%
6561 99%
6423 101%
7487 87%
6353 102%
7135 91%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 14880 Hz ≤ 28 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 14880 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 28 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 14880 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8943 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 17.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
59.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26.8 ms rise
↘ 32.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
9870 Points ∼69%
HTC U12 Plus
12493 Points ∼87% +27%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
8938 Points ∼63% -9%
LG V30
8016 Points ∼56% -19%
OnePlus 6T
13341 Points ∼93% +35%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
14299 Points ∼100% +45%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (8938 - 9870, n=2)
9404 Points ∼66% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=197)
4524 Points ∼32% -54%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
9965 Points ∼99%
HTC U12 Plus
8812 Points ∼88% -12%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
10024 Points ∼100% +1%
Huawei Mate 10
6613 Points ∼66% -34%
LG V30
6078 Points ∼61% -39%
OnePlus 6T
8995 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
8548 Points ∼85% -14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (9965 - 10024, n=2)
9995 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=247)
4308 Points ∼43% -57%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
3360 Points ∼99%
HTC U12 Plus
2429 Points ∼72% -28%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
3378 Points ∼100% +1%
Huawei Mate 10
1883 Points ∼56% -44%
LG V30
1900 Points ∼56% -43%
OnePlus 6T
2384 Points ∼71% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
2441 Points ∼72% -27%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (3360 - 3378, n=2)
3369 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=248)
1270 Points ∼38% -62%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
9326 Points ∼100%
HTC U12 Plus
8601 Points ∼92% -8%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
9225 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei Mate 10
6904 Points ∼74% -26%
LG V30
5603 Points ∼60% -40%
OnePlus 6T
8487 Points ∼91% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
7360 Points ∼79% -21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (9225 - 9326, n=2)
9276 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (3146 - 9868, n=255)
4555 Points ∼49% -51%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
13531 Points ∼100%
HTC U12 Plus
10264 Points ∼76% -24%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
12535 Points ∼93% -7%
Huawei Mate 10
8337 Points ∼62% -38%
LG V30
6854 Points ∼51% -49%
OnePlus 6T
10590 Points ∼78% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
8967 Points ∼66% -34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (12535 - 13531, n=2)
13033 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (6412 - 13531, n=423)
4958 Points ∼37% -63%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
4439 Points ∼100%
HTC U12 Plus
2947 Points ∼66% -34%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4364 Points ∼98% -2%
Huawei Mate 10
2876 Points ∼65% -35%
LG V30
2893 Points ∼65% -35%
OnePlus 6T
3681 Points ∼83% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
2227 Points ∼50% -50%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (4364 - 4439, n=2)
4402 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2293 - 4439, n=277)
1709 Points ∼38% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
4319 Points ∼73%
HTC U12 Plus
4450 Points ∼76% +3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4250 Points ∼72% -2%
Huawei Mate 10
2991 Points ∼51% -31%
LG V30
3809 Points ∼65% -12%
OnePlus 6T
5877 Points ∼100% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
4209 Points ∼72% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (4250 - 4319, n=2)
4285 Points ∼73% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (869 - 8206, n=277)
1465 Points ∼25% -66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
4315 Points ∼83%
HTC U12 Plus
3997 Points ∼77% -7%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4275 Points ∼82% -1%
Huawei Mate 10
2964 Points ∼57% -31%
LG V30
3559 Points ∼69% -18%
OnePlus 6T
5189 Points ∼100% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3512 Points ∼68% -19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (4275 - 4315, n=2)
4295 Points ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1010 - 5189, n=280)
1360 Points ∼26% -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
4493 Points ∼100%
HTC U12 Plus
2656 Points ∼59% -41%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4407 Points ∼98% -2%
Huawei Mate 10
2770 Points ∼62% -38%
LG V30
2855 Points ∼64% -36%
OnePlus 6T
3374 Points ∼75% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
2145 Points ∼48% -52%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (4407 - 4493, n=2)
4450 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=292)
1689 Points ∼38% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
5893 Points ∼70%
HTC U12 Plus
6419 Points ∼76% +9%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
5854 Points ∼70% -1%
Huawei Mate 10
3587 Points ∼43% -39%
LG V30
5819 Points ∼69% -1%
OnePlus 6T
8397 Points ∼100% +42%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
5922 Points ∼71% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (5854 - 5893, n=2)
5874 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=292)
2068 Points ∼25% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
5511 Points ∼87%
HTC U12 Plus
4882 Points ∼77% -11%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
5456 Points ∼86% -1%
Huawei Mate 10
3361 Points ∼53% -39%
LG V30
4728 Points ∼75% -14%
OnePlus 6T
6310 Points ∼100% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
4232 Points ∼67% -23%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (5456 - 5511, n=2)
5484 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7856, n=293)
1734 Points ∼27% -69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
4216 Points ∼100%
HTC U12 Plus
3197 Points ∼76% -24%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4183 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei Mate 10
2887 Points ∼68% -32%
LG V30
2931 Points ∼70% -30%
OnePlus 6T
3537 Points ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
2118 Points ∼50% -50%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (4183 - 4216, n=2)
4200 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2281 - 4216, n=352)
1642 Points ∼39% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
4232 Points ∼81%
HTC U12 Plus
3488 Points ∼67% -18%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4206 Points ∼80% -1%
Huawei Mate 10
3033 Points ∼58% -28%
LG V30
3903 Points ∼74% -8%
OnePlus 6T
5241 Points ∼100% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3742 Points ∼71% -12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (4206 - 4232, n=2)
4219 Points ∼80% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (815 - 5241, n=352)
1186 Points ∼23% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
4228 Points ∼89%
HTC U12 Plus
3419 Points ∼72% -19%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4201 Points ∼89% -1%
Huawei Mate 10
2999 Points ∼63% -29%
LG V30
3635 Points ∼77% -14%
OnePlus 6T
4734 Points ∼100% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3197 Points ∼68% -24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (4201 - 4228, n=2)
4215 Points ∼89% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (951 - 4734, n=360)
1134 Points ∼24% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
4215 Points ∼100%
HTC U12 Plus
2774 Points ∼66% -34%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4150 Points ∼98% -2%
Huawei Mate 10
2852 Points ∼68% -32%
LG V30
2808 Points ∼67% -33%
OnePlus 6T
3483 Points ∼83% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
2176 Points ∼52% -48%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (4150 - 4215, n=2)
4183 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4215, n=384)
1540 Points ∼37% -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
5245 Points ∼63%
HTC U12 Plus
5637 Points ∼68% +7%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
5305 Points ∼64% +1%
Huawei Mate 10
3522 Points ∼43% -33%
LG V30
5895 Points ∼71% +12%
OnePlus 6T
8272 Points ∼100% +58%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
6554 Points ∼79% +25%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (5245 - 5305, n=2)
5275 Points ∼64% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (46 - 8312, n=384)
1632 Points ∼20% -69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
4975 Points ∼79%
HTC U12 Plus
4585 Points ∼72% -8%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4996 Points ∼79% 0%
Huawei Mate 10
3347 Points ∼53% -33%
LG V30
4738 Points ∼75% -5%
OnePlus 6T
6336 Points ∼100% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
4529 Points ∼71% -9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (4975 - 4996, n=2)
4986 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 6454, n=392)
1387 Points ∼22% -72%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
35932 Points ∼98%
HTC U12 Plus
33810 Points ∼92% -6%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
36755 Points ∼100% +2%
Huawei Mate 10
21611 Points ∼59% -40%
LG V30
14601 Points ∼40% -59%
OnePlus 6T
35022 Points ∼95% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
30765 Points ∼84% -14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (35932 - 36755, n=2)
36344 Points ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=539)
12880 Points ∼35% -64%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
67956 Points ∼80%
HTC U12 Plus
81726 Points ∼96% +20%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
67730 Points ∼80% 0%
Huawei Mate 10
36231 Points ∼43% -47%
LG V30
55271 Points ∼65% -19%
OnePlus 6T
84998 Points ∼100% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
77003 Points ∼91% +13%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (67730 - 67956, n=2)
67843 Points ∼80% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=539)
17994 Points ∼21% -74%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
56722 Points ∼88%
HTC U12 Plus
62152 Points ∼96% +10%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
57047 Points ∼88% +1%
Huawei Mate 10
31605 Points ∼49% -44%
LG V30
34139 Points ∼53% -40%
OnePlus 6T
64534 Points ∼100% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
57711 Points ∼89% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (56722 - 57047, n=2)
56885 Points ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=540)
15114 Points ∼23% -73%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
134 fps ∼88%
HTC U12 Plus
98 fps ∼64% -27%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
120 fps ∼79% -10%
Huawei Mate 10
97 fps ∼64% -28%
LG V30
113 fps ∼74% -16%
OnePlus 6T
152 fps ∼100% +13%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
102 fps ∼67% -24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (120 - 134, n=2)
127 fps ∼84% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=564)
31.4 fps ∼21% -77%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
62 fps ∼100%
HTC U12 Plus
59 fps ∼95% -5%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
61 fps ∼98% -2%
Huawei Mate 10
60 fps ∼97% -3%
LG V30
60 fps ∼97% -3%
OnePlus 6T
60 fps ∼97% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
58 fps ∼94% -6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (61 - 62, n=2)
61.5 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=567)
25 fps ∼40% -60%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
87 fps ∼100%
HTC U12 Plus
72 fps ∼83% -17%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
73 fps ∼84% -16%
Huawei Mate 10
53 fps ∼61% -39%
LG V30
59 fps ∼68% -32%
OnePlus 6T
59 fps ∼68% -32%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
54 fps ∼62% -38%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (73 - 87, n=2)
80 fps ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=486)
16.8 fps ∼19% -81%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
60 fps ∼100%
HTC U12 Plus
35 fps ∼58% -42%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
42 fps ∼70% -30%
Huawei Mate 10
51 fps ∼85% -15%
LG V30
35 fps ∼58% -42%
OnePlus 6T
59 fps ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
51 fps ∼85% -15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (42 - 60, n=2)
51 fps ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=489)
16 fps ∼27% -73%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
55 fps ∼93%
HTC U12 Plus
39 fps ∼66% -29%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
29 fps ∼49% -47%
Huawei Mate 10
38 fps ∼64% -31%
LG V30
40 fps ∼68% -27%
OnePlus 6T
59 fps ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
32 fps ∼54% -42%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (29 - 55, n=2)
42 fps ∼71% -24%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 88, n=349)
14.3 fps ∼24% -74%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
51 fps ∼96%
HTC U12 Plus
31 fps ∼58% -39%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
26 fps ∼49% -49%
Huawei Mate 10
37 fps ∼70% -27%
LG V30
19 fps ∼36% -63%
OnePlus 6T
53 fps ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
29 fps ∼55% -43%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (26 - 51, n=2)
38.5 fps ∼73% -25%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 110, n=352)
13.9 fps ∼26% -73%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
21 fps ∼95%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
19 fps ∼86% -10%
OnePlus 6T
22 fps ∼100% +5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (19 - 21, n=2)
20 fps ∼91% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 59, n=62)
10.2 fps ∼46% -51%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
13 fps ∼93%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
13 fps ∼93% 0%
OnePlus 6T
14 fps ∼100% +8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (13 - 13, n=2)
13 fps ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 31, n=62)
6.49 fps ∼46% -50%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
32 fps ∼94%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
18 fps ∼53% -44%
OnePlus 6T
34 fps ∼100% +6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (18 - 32, n=2)
25 fps ∼74% -22%
Average of class Smartphone (5.7 - 59, n=62)
14.4 fps ∼42% -55%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
34 fps ∼92%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
33 fps ∼89% -3%
OnePlus 6T
37 fps ∼100% +9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (33 - 34, n=2)
33.5 fps ∼91% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 63, n=61)
15.7 fps ∼42% -54%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
32 fps ∼91%
HTC U12 Plus
35 fps ∼100% +9%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
31 fps ∼89% -3%
Huawei Mate 10
21 fps ∼60% -34%
LG V30
24 fps ∼69% -25%
OnePlus 6T
35 fps ∼100% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
25 fps ∼71% -22%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (31 - 32, n=2)
31.5 fps ∼90% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (6.3 - 54, n=280)
9.86 fps ∼28% -69%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
30 fps ∼97%
HTC U12 Plus
20 fps ∼65% -33%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
16 fps ∼52% -47%
Huawei Mate 10
21 fps ∼68% -30%
LG V30
13 fps ∼42% -57%
OnePlus 6T
31 fps ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
24 fps ∼77% -20%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (16 - 30, n=2)
23 fps ∼74% -23%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 58, n=283)
8.89 fps ∼29% -70%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
302465 Points ∼100%
HTC U12 Plus
255739 Points ∼85% -15%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
300617 Points ∼99% -1%
OnePlus 6T
294488 Points ∼97% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
288062 Points ∼95% -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (300617 - 302465, n=2)
301541 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=170)
118332 Points ∼39% -61%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
254229 Points ∼100%
HTC U12 Plus
221971 Points ∼87% -13%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
250848 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei Mate 10
178234 Points ∼70% -30%
LG V30
173749 Points ∼68% -32%
OnePlus 6T
228939 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
232931 Points ∼92% -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (250848 - 254229, n=2)
252539 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 254229, n=387)
75990 Points ∼30% -70%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
1430 Points ∼100%
HTC U12 Plus
1437 Points ∼100% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
1424 Points ∼99% 0%
Huawei Mate 10
1253 Points ∼87% -12%
LG V30
1009 Points ∼70% -29%
OnePlus 6T
1398 Points ∼97% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
1288 Points ∼90% -10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (1424 - 1430, n=2)
1427 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=499)
698 Points ∼49% -51%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
5455 Points ∼68%
HTC U12 Plus
7945 Points ∼100% +46%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
6273 Points ∼79% +15%
Huawei Mate 10
3928 Points ∼49% -28%
LG V30
5949 Points ∼75% +9%
OnePlus 6T
7969 Points ∼100% +46%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
7965 Points ∼100% +46%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (5455 - 6273, n=2)
5864 Points ∼74% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=499)
1737 Points ∼22% -68%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
5929 Points ∼94%
HTC U12 Plus
3641 Points ∼58% -39%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
6283 Points ∼100% +6%
Huawei Mate 10
4141 Points ∼66% -30%
LG V30
2091 Points ∼33% -65%
OnePlus 6T
4344 Points ∼69% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3521 Points ∼56% -41%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (5929 - 6283, n=2)
6106 Points ∼97% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=499)
1244 Points ∼20% -79%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
8602 Points ∼100%
HTC U12 Plus
7862 Points ∼91% -9%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
8604 Points ∼100% 0%
Huawei Mate 10
5228 Points ∼61% -39%
LG V30
4238 Points ∼49% -51%
OnePlus 6T
8156 Points ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
6556 Points ∼76% -24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (8602 - 8604, n=2)
8603 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=499)
2512 Points ∼29% -71%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20
4466 Points ∼95%
HTC U12 Plus
4252 Points ∼91% -5%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4687 Points ∼100% +5%
Huawei Mate 10
3210 Points ∼68% -28%
LG V30
2702 Points ∼58% -39%
OnePlus 6T
4458 Points ∼95% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3923 Points ∼84% -12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (4466 - 4687, n=2)
4577 Points ∼98% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=503)
1255 Points ∼27% -72%

Legend

 
Huawei Mate 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, ARM Mali-G76 MP10, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
HTC U12 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, ARM Mali-G76 MP10, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei Mate 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
109.18 Points ∼100% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (107 - 109, n=2)
108 Points ∼99% +1%
Huawei Mate 20 (Chrome 70.0.3538.80)
106.97 Points ∼98%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
87.036 Points ∼80% -19%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
86.123 Points ∼79% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
80.876 Points ∼74% -24%
Huawei Mate 10 (Chrome Version 63)
58.572 Points ∼54% -45%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
52.9 Points ∼48% -51%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=422)
36.7 Points ∼34% -66%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
23285 Points ∼100% +7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (21849 - 23285, n=2)
22567 Points ∼97% +3%
Huawei Mate 20 (Chrome 70.0.3538.80)
21849 Points ∼94%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
16824 Points ∼72% -23%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
16285 Points ∼70% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
14617 Points ∼63% -33%
Huawei Mate 10 (Chrome Version 63)
11205 Points ∼48% -49%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
10506 Points ∼45% -52%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=557)
5556 Points ∼24% -75%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=578)
11474 ms * ∼100% -489%
Huawei Mate 10 (Chrome Version 63)
3704.1 ms * ∼32% -90%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
3630 ms * ∼32% -86%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
2409.6 ms * ∼21% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
2316.8 ms * ∼20% -19%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
2281.6 ms * ∼20% -17%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
1951.9 ms * ∼17% -0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (1948 - 1952, n=2)
1950 ms * ∼17% -0%
Huawei Mate 20 (Chrome 70.0.3538.80)
1947.9 ms * ∼17%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei Mate 20 (Chrome 70.0.3538.80)
124 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
124 Points ∼100% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (124 - 124, n=2)
124 Points ∼100% 0%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
101 Points ∼81% -19%
Average of class Smartphone (25 - 161, n=63)
63.6 Points ∼51% -49%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
334 Points ∼100% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (328 - 334, n=2)
331 Points ∼99% +1%
Huawei Mate 20 (Chrome 70.0.3538.80)
328 Points ∼98%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
260 Points ∼78% -21%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
257 Points ∼77% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
251 Points ∼75% -23%
Huawei Mate 10 (Chrome Version 63)
156 Points ∼47% -52%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
138 Points ∼41% -58%
Average of class Smartphone (91 - 362, n=284)
111 Points ∼33% -66%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei Mate 20HTC U12 PlusHuawei Mate 20 ProHuawei Mate 10LG V30OnePlus 6TXiaomi Mi 8 Explorer EditionAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-14%
0%
-8%
-38%
-27%
-29%
-12%
-60%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
72.25 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
63.64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-12%
72.38 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
0%
62.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-13%
47.2
-35%
65.5 (51.3 - 72.4, n=5)
-9%
45.5 (3.4 - 87.1, n=317)
-37%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.24 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
84.32 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
83.18 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
0%
80.62 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
62.8
-25%
80 (75.4 - 83.2, n=5)
-4%
63.7 (8.2 - 96.5, n=317)
-23%
Random Write 4KB
158.15
104.24
-34%
157.84
0%
105.31
-33%
10.21
-94%
22
-86%
22.65
-86%
92.1 (19.5 - 164, n=17)
-42%
16.1 (0.14 - 164, n=607)
-90%
Random Read 4KB
157.95
118.14
-25%
157.42
0%
169.67
7%
78.17
-51%
138.5
-12%
135.21
-14%
141 (132 - 158, n=17)
-11%
38.3 (1.59 - 173, n=607)
-76%
Sequential Write 256KB
196.66
195.82
0%
196.39
0%
201.67
3%
193.22
-2%
204.4
4%
205.23
4%
202 (192 - 212, n=17)
3%
79.9 (2.99 - 246, n=607)
-59%
Sequential Read 256KB
839.57
709.11
-16%
853.28
2%
790.33
-6%
669.48
-20%
735.3
-12%
691.65
-18%
767 (675 - 853, n=17)
-9%
230 (12.1 - 895, n=607)
-73%
Asphalt 9: Legends
010203040Tooltip
; 1.1.4a: Ø30.8 (23-32)
PUBG Mobile
010203040Tooltip
; 0.9.0: Ø29.7 (18-31)
Carga Máxima
 36.3 °C37.3 °C34.7 °C 
 35.9 °C36.3 °C35.6 °C 
 34.8 °C34.7 °C34.7 °C 
Máximo: 37.3 °C
Médio: 35.6 °C
31 °C32.7 °C36.4 °C
31.5 °C34 °C34.8 °C
31.1 °C33.2 °C33.7 °C
Máximo: 36.4 °C
Médio: 33.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  30.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.635.82528.930.83125.227.94026.125.25030.235.96326.928.98028.732.210029.126.412518.429.41602142.820024.34325017.449.331516.853.840015.352.850015.656.163014.159.280015.262.1100014.161.3125014.663.2160014.667.1200014.267.2250013.868.131501468.6400014.670.4500014.469.2630014.666800014.458.81000014.854.31250014.654.11600014.742.8SPL2778.4N0.939.8median 14.6median 58.8Delta1.41030.7362524.126.829.926.328.729.836.127.429.62128.119.527.418.835.719.247.517.645.516.947.315.8541552.31553.614.753.914.859.814.664.114.366.413.467.914.469.314.464.714.8661568.514.866.314.765.51562.914.957.215.255.815.745.326.877.70.938.7median 15median 57.21.28.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei Mate 20Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei Mate 20 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei Mate 20 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.02 / 0.26 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.69 / 2.28 / 2.52 Watt
Carga midlight 5.21 / 8.49 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei Mate 20
4000 mAh
HTC U12 Plus
3500 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4200 mAh
Huawei Mate 10
4000 mAh
LG V30
3300 mAh
OnePlus 6T
3700 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3000 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-7%
4%
-5%
24%
18%
-50%
2%
15%
Idle Minimum *
0.69
0.77
-12%
0.95
-38%
0.89
-29%
0.72
-4%
0.7
-1%
1.8
-161%
0.82 (0.69 - 0.95, n=2)
-19%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=635)
-28%
Idle Average *
2.28
2.18
4%
2.17
5%
2.31
-1%
1.37
40%
1.1
52%
2.9
-27%
2.23 (2.17 - 2.28, n=2)
2%
1.721 (0.6 - 6.2, n=634)
25%
Idle Maximum *
2.52
2.21
12%
2.25
11%
2.38
6%
1.41
44%
2.1
17%
3.5
-39%
2.39 (2.25 - 2.52, n=2)
5%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=635)
21%
Load Average *
5.21
6.25
-20%
4.47
14%
4.87
7%
3.46
34%
4.2
19%
4.8
8%
4.84 (4.47 - 5.21, n=2)
7%
4.03 (0.8 - 10.8, n=629)
23%
Load Maximum *
8.49
10.16
-20%
6.15
28%
9.16
-8%
7.83
8%
8.3
2%
11.2
-32%
7.32 (6.15 - 8.49, n=2)
14%
5.75 (1.2 - 14.2, n=629)
32%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
31h 32min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14h 45min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 10min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 47min
Huawei Mate 20
4000 mAh
HTC U12 Plus
3500 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4200 mAh
Huawei Mate 10
4000 mAh
LG V30
3300 mAh
OnePlus 6T
3700 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-35%
-10%
-7%
-10%
-5%
-23%
Reader / Idle
1892
1452
-23%
1747
-8%
1671
-12%
1914
1%
1936
2%
1401
-26%
H.264
1030
464
-55%
854
-17%
1003
-3%
822
-20%
903
-12%
921
-11%
WiFi v1.3
885
507
-43%
767
-13%
865
-2%
774
-13%
865
-2%
694
-22%
Load
287
230
-20%
282
-2%
259
-10%
267
-7%
261
-9%
191
-33%

Pro

+ Bem construído
+ Serviços de localização precisos e rápidos
+ LTE Cat.4
+ Wi-Fi MIMO
+ Conector de 3,5 mm
+ Android 9.0 Pie
+ Boa qualidade das chamadas
+ Dual VoLTE
+ Impressionantes câmera traseira tripla
+ Tela IPS brilhante
+ SoC carro-chefe
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Carregador rápido incluído na caixa

Contra

- Certificação IP53 apenas
- Sem carregamento sem fio
- Sem reconhecimento facial IV
- PWM flickering
- Cartão de memória nano, em vez do cartão microSD
The Huawei Mate 20 smartphone review. Test device courtesy of Huawei Germany.
The Huawei Mate 20 smartphone review. Test device courtesy of Huawei Germany.

O Huawei Mate 20 é um carro-chefe parecido ao seu irmão mais caro, o Mate 20 Pro. A Huawei equipou o Mate 20 com o seu SoC Kirin 980, o que torna o dispositivo tão poderoso quanto o modelo Pro. Além disso, a tela de resolução mais baixa do primeiro ajuda a conseguir uma excelente duração da bateria, enquanto a inclusão de um conector de fone de ouvido é um bônus bem-vindo. O Mate 20 carece de alguns dos recursos extravagantes do Mate 20 Pro, como a digitalização facial 3D, o sensor de digitais na tela ou o carregamento sem fio, o que pode frustrar algumas pessoas.

O Huawei Mate 20 é um smartphone fantástico, mas que renuncia a alguns dos recursos premium do Mate 20 Pro. No entanto, em nossa opinião, vale a pena economizar os 200-Euros (~$225). 

Além disso, o Mate 20 usa uma matriz de câmeras triplas Leica inferior, que apresenta um desempenho notavelmente pior com pouca luz. No entanto, as câmeras ainda estão no mesmo nível do que outros carros-chefe de 2018 oferecem. No entanto, é um compromisso. Da mesma forma, a Huawei equipou o dispositivo com um monitor LCD plano, comparado ao painel OLED curvo do Mate 20 Pro. Finalmente, o dispositivo tem uma classificação IP inferior, para a qual não podemos oferecer explicações. O IP53 simplesmente não é bom o suficiente para um smartphone topo de gama lançado em 2018, particularmente quando muitos dos seus concorrentes são classificados como IP67/68. Nossas preocupações sobre a menor fonte de energia eram infundadas, embora o Mate 20 carregasse rapidamente. No geral, o Mate 20 tem uma excelente relação qualidade/preço e é uma excelente alternativa ao Mate 20 Pro, mas o primeiro não possui algumas das características mais comentadas do último.

Huawei Mate 20 - 11/27/2018 v6
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
92%
Teclado
68 / 75 → 90%
Mouse
96%
Conectividade
55 / 60 → 91%
Peso
89%
Bateria
98%
Pantalha
90%
Desempenho do jogos
68 / 63 → 100%
Desempenho da aplicação
86 / 70 → 100%
Temperatura
90%
Ruído
100%
Audio
74 / 91 → 81%
Camera
82%
Médio
84%
90%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Mate 20
Manuel Masiero, 2018-12- 3 (Update: 2018-12- 5)