Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Nova Plus
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 485 cd/m²
Contraste: 970:1 (Preto: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.36
| Huawei Nova Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50 | OnePlus 3 Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.50 | Honor 8 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20 | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50 | ZTE Axon 7 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.50 | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.20 | Lenovo Moto Z Play AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -8% | -9% | -1% | -20% | 22% | 25% | |
| Brightness middle | 485 | 419 -14% | 451 -7% | 658 36% | 328 -32% | 378 -22% | 509 5% |
| Brightness | 481 | 431 -10% | 443 -8% | 633 32% | 334 -31% | 380 -21% | 511 6% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 84 -7% | 93 3% | 93 3% | 88 -2% | 91 1% | 93 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.4 20% | 0.66 -32% | ||||
| Contrast | 970 | 1128 16% | 997 3% | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 4.1 2% | 5.4 -29% | 4.9 -17% | 4.6 -10% | 1.95 54% | 2.2 48% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.9 | 12 -52% | 9.9 -25% | 9.1 -15% | 14.7 -86% | 3.09 61% | 5.8 27% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.8 | 3.3 31% | 6.7 -40% | 5.8 -21% | 2.8 42% | 1.86 61% | 2 58% |
| Gamma | 2.36 93% | 2.1 105% | 2.33 94% | 2.26 97% | 2.29 96% | 2.13 103% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 7568 86% | 6550 99% | 8262 79% | 7840 83% | 6612 98% | 6376 102% | 6768 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 89.38 | ||||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Nova Plus | |
| ZTE Axon 7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
| Honor 8 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z Play | |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei Nova Plus Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash | ZTE Axon 7 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash | Honor 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash | OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Lenovo Moto Z Play Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 81% | -35% | 53% | 8% | 101% | 31% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 241.6 | 406.5 68% | 209.4 -13% | 282 17% | 247.5 2% | 408.7 69% | 254.8 5% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 82.1 | 150.9 84% | 60.4 -26% | 188 129% | 119.3 45% | 153.3 87% | 73.1 -11% |
| Random Read 4KB | 35.64 | 121.1 240% | 22.9 -36% | 74 108% | 34.16 -4% | 137.6 286% | 38.78 9% |
| Random Write 4KB | 30.12 | 16.22 -46% | 11.2 -63% | 7.4 -75% | 31.5 5% | 18.23 -39% | 45.58 51% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 41.64 | 78.4 88% | 79.2 90% | 53.7 29% | 74.6 79% | ||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 33.32 | 51.3 54% | 50.1 50% | 23.59 -29% | 50.6 52% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 28 fps | ||
| very low | 29 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Huawei Nova Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Honor 8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
OnePlus 3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.03 / 0.11 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.49 / 1.63 / 1.76 Watt |
| Carga |
2.98 / 4.99 Watt |
    
| |
| Huawei Nova Plus 3340 mAh | OnePlus 3 3000 mAh | Honor 8 3000 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh | ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -36% | -35% | -28% | -29% | -19% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.49 | 0.57 -16% | 0.78 -59% | 0.83 -69% | 0.64 -31% | 0.96 -96% |
| Idle Average * | 1.63 | 1.24 24% | 1.89 -16% | 2.11 -29% | 0.84 48% | 1.64 -1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.76 | 1.36 23% | 2.02 -15% | 2.12 -20% | 0.87 51% | 1.71 3% |
| Load Average * | 2.98 | 5.92 -99% | 5.28 -77% | 3.41 -14% | 6.02 -102% | 2.98 -0% |
| Load Maximum * | 4.99 | 10.53 -111% | 5.44 -9% | 5.46 -9% | 10.45 -109% | 5.08 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei Nova Plus 3340 mAh | OnePlus 3 3000 mAh | Honor 8 3000 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh | ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z Play 3510 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -11% | -31% | -3% | -26% | 3% | 41% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2048 | 1338 -35% | 1487 -27% | 1502 -27% | 1735 -15% | 2323 13% | 2540 24% |
| H.264 | 732 | 847 16% | 526 -28% | 905 24% | 704 -4% | 672 -8% | 1190 63% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 820 | 840 2% | 499 -39% | 797 -3% | 411 -50% | 626 -24% | 824 0% |
| Load | 366 | 268 -27% | 255 -30% | 352 -4% | 245 -33% | 483 32% | 652 78% |
Pro
Contra
O Huawei Nova Plus é um smartphone realmente bom e somente conseguimos encontrar apenas algumas desvantagens reais. Além da tela brilhante você recebe duas câmeras realmente boas. Os fanáticos das "selfies" desfrutarão da câmera frontal, em particular. Você também recebe uma poderosa bateria, que, de fato, mantém sua promessa e energiza o smartphone durante um dia ou mais.
Você terá que fazer alguns compromissos menores em termos de qualidade de construção, embora estas sejam críticas em um nível muito alto. Também é desafortunado que os aplicativos não possam ser armazenados em um cartão microSD e o slot também é relativamente lento. O Wi-Fi de 5,0 GHz também deve ser um problema nesta faixa de preços.
O Huawei Nova Plus oferece um potente pacote com boas câmeras e longas durações da bateria.
Ainda podemos recomendar o Nova Plus, porque traz im pacote conveniente. No entanto, não faz nenhum mal dar uma olhada nos rivais nesta faixa de preços.
Huawei Nova Plus
-
12/02/2016 v5.1(old)
Daniel Schmidt
Pricecompare
