Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Nova 2

Manuel Masiero (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 10/19/2017

Selfie superstar? A Huawei criou um telefone de gama média com o Nova 2 de 5 polegadas e lhe deu uma característica especial com uma câmera frontal de 20 MP. Nossa análise revelará se os fanáticos das selfies devem optar por ele.

Huawei Nova 2 (Nova Serie)
Processador
HiSilicon Kirin 659
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
5 polegadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 443 PPI, capacitiva, Full-HD, LTPS, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 48.4 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector combinado para fones e microfone (3,5 mm), Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 128 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de digitais, sensor de proximidade, bússola digital, sensor de gravidade, giroscópio, USB-OTG, BT aptX
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM-Quadband (850, 900, 1.800, 1.900 MHz), UMTS-Quadband (800, 850, 900, 2.100 MHz), LTE Cat.6 (800, 850, 900, 1.800, 2.100, 2.600 MHz), Downloads up to 300 MBit/s, Uploads up to 50 MBit/s, Nano-SIM, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 6.9 x 142.2 x 68.9
Bateria
2950 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Tempo de conversação 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 18 h, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 18 h, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 400 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 400 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix F/1.8, LED flash, pixel size 1.25 µm
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto=falante mono, Teclado: virtual, Fonte de alimentação modular, cabo USB, fones, bolsa protetora, ferramenta SIM, guia de início rápido, EMUI 5.1, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
143 g, Suprimento de energia: 35 g
Preço
399 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
325 MBit/s ∼100% +457%
Honor 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
283 MBit/s ∼87% +385%
HTC U Ultra
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB eMMC Flash
247 MBit/s ∼76% +324%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
242 MBit/s ∼74% +315%
Huawei Nova 2
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
58.3 MBit/s ∼18%
Huawei Nova
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
20 MBit/s ∼6% -66%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HTC U Ultra
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB eMMC Flash
259 MBit/s ∼100% +245%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
220 MBit/s ∼85% +193%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
148 MBit/s ∼57% +97%
Honor 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
140 MBit/s ∼54% +87%
Huawei Nova 2
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
75 MBit/s ∼29%
Huawei Nova
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
50.9 MBit/s ∼20% -32%
Huawei Nova 2: Whole route
Huawei Nova 2: Whole route
Huawei Nova 2: Turning point
Huawei Nova 2: Turning point
Huawei Nova 2: Bridge
Huawei Nova 2: Bridge
Garmin Edge 500: Whole route
Garmin Edge 500: Whole route
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
484
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
489
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
486
cd/m²
484
cd/m²
496
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 496 cd/m² Médio: 487.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.45 cd/m²
iluminação: 97 %
iluminação com acumulador: 481 cd/m²
Contraste: 1002:1 (Preto: 0.48 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.2 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.31
Huawei Nova 2
IPS, 1920x1080, 5
BQ Aquaris X Pro
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Honor 9
IPS/LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.15
HTC U Ultra
SLCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.7
Huawei P9 Plus
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
LG G6
IPS LCD, 2880x1440, 5.7
Huawei Nova
IPS, 1920x1080, 5
Screen
-20%
22%
22%
-4%
46%
13%
Brightness
487
473
-3%
535
10%
445
-9%
366
-25%
611
25%
485
0%
Brightness Distribution
97
88
-9%
92
-5%
88
-9%
87
-10%
89
-8%
94
-3%
Black Level *
0.48
0.51
-6%
0.42
12%
0.22
54%
0.23
52%
0.44
8%
Contrast
1002
898
-10%
1310
31%
2136
113%
2809
180%
1120
12%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.2
7.1
-37%
3.3
37%
5.5
-6%
5.1
2%
4.5
13%
4.2
19%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.8
10.5
-54%
3.6
47%
7.6
-12%
5.5
19%
6
12%
3.8
44%
Gamma
2.31 104%
2.28 105%
2.38 101%
2.2 109%
2.24 107%
2.27 106%
2.39 100%
CCT
8149 80%
8951 73%
7226 90%
7454 87%
7388 88%
7996 81%
7438 87%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
67.74
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.05

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8586 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
19.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.2 ms rise
↘ 13.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24 ms rise
↘ 28.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
63304 Points ∼28%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
66226 Points ∼29% +5%
Honor 9
150276 Points ∼66% +137%
HTC U Ultra
139017 Points ∼61% +120%
Huawei P9 Plus
98413 Points ∼43% +55%
LG G6
151751 Points ∼67% +140%
Huawei Nova
63206 Points ∼28% 0%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
4822 Points ∼47%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4915 Points ∼48% +2%
Honor 9
6113 Points ∼59% +27%
HTC U Ultra
5217 Points ∼51% +8%
LG G6
5152 Points ∼50% +7%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
6252 Points ∼73%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
5886 Points ∼69% -6%
Honor 9
7034 Points ∼82% +13%
HTC U Ultra
5217 Points ∼61% -17%
Huawei P9 Plus
7159 Points ∼84% +15%
LG G6
5703 Points ∼67% -9%
Huawei Nova
4596 Points ∼54% -26%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
847 Points ∼50%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
806 Points ∼48% -5%
Honor 9
1069 Points ∼63% +26%
HTC U Ultra
907 Points ∼53% +7%
Huawei P9 Plus
1049 Points ∼62% +24%
LG G6
1073 Points ∼63% +27%
Huawei Nova
727 Points ∼43% -14%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
843 Points ∼9%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1012 Points ∼11% +20%
Honor 9
4126 Points ∼45% +389%
HTC U Ultra
4591 Points ∼50% +445%
Huawei P9 Plus
1512 Points ∼16% +79%
LG G6
5138 Points ∼56% +509%
Huawei Nova
1006 Points ∼11% +19%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
2011 Points ∼45%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1046 Points ∼24% -48%
Honor 9
3258 Points ∼74% +62%
HTC U Ultra
1581 Points ∼36% -21%
Huawei P9 Plus
2667 Points ∼60% +33%
LG G6
1930 Points ∼44% -4%
Huawei Nova
1531 Points ∼35% -24%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
2959 Points ∼29%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3492 Points ∼34% +18%
Honor 9
4154 Points ∼40% +40%
HTC U Ultra
2834 Points ∼28% -4%
Huawei P9 Plus
3932 Points ∼38% +33%
LG G6
3646 Points ∼35% +23%
Huawei Nova
2280 Points ∼22% -23%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
1436 Points ∼38%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1314 Points ∼35% -8%
Honor 9
2779 Points ∼73% +94%
HTC U Ultra
2078 Points ∼55% +45%
Huawei P9 Plus
2019 Points ∼53% +41%
LG G6
2496 Points ∼66% +74%
Huawei Nova
1264 Points ∼33% -12%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
2997 Points ∼35%
Honor 9
Points ∼0% -100%
LG G6
7080 Points ∼83% +136%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
3556 Points ∼14%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4369 Points ∼17% +23%
Honor 9
6527 Points ∼26% +84%
LG G6
4369 Points ∼17% +23%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
918 Points ∼15%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
928 Points ∼16% +1%
Honor 9
1869 Points ∼31% +104%
LG G6
1831 Points ∼31% +99%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
1662 Points ∼54%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2132 Points ∼69% +28%
Honor 9
2287 Points ∼74% +38%
HTC U Ultra
1763 Points ∼57% +6%
Huawei P9 Plus
2547 Points ∼83% +53%
LG G6
1955 Points ∼64% +18%
Huawei Nova
1802 Points ∼59% +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
330 Points ∼6%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
379 Points ∼7% +15%
Honor 9
2798 Points ∼52% +748%
HTC U Ultra
2405 Points ∼45% +629%
Huawei P9 Plus
807 Points ∼15% +145%
LG G6
2980 Points ∼55% +803%
Huawei Nova
391 Points ∼7% +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
402 Points ∼10%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
464 Points ∼12% +15%
Honor 9
2666 Points ∼69% +563%
HTC U Ultra
2225 Points ∼57% +453%
Huawei P9 Plus
952 Points ∼25% +137%
LG G6
2669 Points ∼69% +564%
Huawei Nova
473 Points ∼12% +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
1657 Points ∼54%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2127 Points ∼69% +28%
Honor 9
1809 Points ∼59% +9%
HTC U Ultra
1646 Points ∼53% -1%
Huawei P9 Plus
2336 Points ∼76% +41%
LG G6
1961 Points ∼64% +18%
Huawei Nova
1821 Points ∼59% +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
526 Points ∼7%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
725 Points ∼9% +38%
Honor 9
2990 Points ∼39% +468%
HTC U Ultra
3807 Points ∼49% +624%
Huawei P9 Plus
1042 Points ∼13% +98%
LG G6
4121 Points ∼53% +683%
Huawei Nova
737 Points ∼10% +40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
620 Points ∼12%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
849 Points ∼17% +37%
Honor 9
2611 Points ∼52% +321%
HTC U Ultra
2947 Points ∼59% +375%
Huawei P9 Plus
1188 Points ∼24% +92%
LG G6
3282 Points ∼66% +429%
Huawei Nova
849 Points ∼17% +37%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
14488 Points ∼20%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
17044 Points ∼24% +18%
Honor 9
15150 Points ∼21% +5%
HTC U Ultra
21263 Points ∼30% +47%
Huawei P9 Plus
15331 Points ∼21% +6%
LG G6
22335 Points ∼31% +54%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
11688 Points ∼3%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13277 Points ∼3% +14%
Honor 9
38979 Points ∼9% +233%
HTC U Ultra
33446 Points ∼7% +186%
Huawei P9 Plus
21807 Points ∼5% +87%
LG G6
32128 Points ∼7% +175%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
12212 Points ∼6%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13963 Points ∼7% +14%
Honor 9
28883 Points ∼15% +137%
HTC U Ultra
29668 Points ∼15% +143%
Huawei P9 Plus
19936 Points ∼10% +63%
LG G6
29276 Points ∼15% +140%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
19 fps ∼1%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
23 fps ∼2% +21%
Honor 9
60 fps ∼4% +216%
HTC U Ultra
74 fps ∼5% +289%
Huawei P9 Plus
41 fps ∼3% +116%
LG G6
75 fps ∼5% +295%
Huawei Nova
23 fps ∼2% +21%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
20 fps ∼4%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
22 fps ∼5% +10%
Honor 9
55 fps ∼12% +175%
HTC U Ultra
46 fps ∼10% +130%
Huawei P9 Plus
43 fps ∼9% +115%
LG G6
46 fps ∼10% +130%
Huawei Nova
22 fps ∼5% +10%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
7.9 fps ∼1%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.8 fps ∼2% +24%
Honor 9
30 fps ∼6% +280%
HTC U Ultra
26 fps ∼5% +229%
Huawei P9 Plus
18 fps ∼3% +128%
LG G6
38 fps ∼7% +381%
Huawei Nova
9.8 fps ∼2% +24%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
8.9 fps ∼2%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.6 fps ∼3% +8%
Honor 9
28 fps ∼8% +215%
HTC U Ultra
23 fps ∼6% +158%
Huawei P9 Plus
19 fps ∼5% +113%
LG G6
27 fps ∼7% +203%
Huawei Nova
10 fps ∼3% +12%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
4.8 fps ∼1%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.4 fps ∼2% +33%
Honor 9
22 fps ∼5% +358%
HTC U Ultra
12 fps ∼3% +150%
Huawei P9 Plus
10 fps ∼2% +108%
LG G6
29 fps ∼7% +504%
Huawei Nova
6.2 fps ∼1% +29%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
5.2 fps ∼3%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.3 fps ∼4% +21%
Honor 9
22 fps ∼13% +323%
HTC U Ultra
12 fps ∼7% +131%
Huawei P9 Plus
11 fps ∼6% +112%
LG G6
16 fps ∼9% +208%
Huawei Nova
6.6 fps ∼4% +27%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
2.9 fps ∼1%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼1% +21%
Honor 9
15 fps ∼4% +417%
HTC U Ultra
15 fps ∼4% +417%
Huawei P9 Plus
6.2 fps ∼2% +114%
LG G6
20 fps ∼6% +590%
Huawei Nova
3.4 fps ∼1% +17%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
3.1 fps ∼0%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼0% +13%
Honor 9
16 fps ∼0% +416%
HTC U Ultra
8.4 fps ∼0% +171%
Huawei P9 Plus
6.8 fps ∼0% +119%
LG G6
11 fps ∼0% +255%
Huawei Nova
3.6 fps ∼0% +16%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
4.96 fps ∼13%
LG G6
24.34 fps ∼63% +391%
Basemark X 1.1
High Quality (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
8749 Points ∼20%
LG G6
35449 Points ∼80% +305%
Medium Quality (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
17001 Points ∼38%
LG G6
37621 Points ∼84% +121%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
147 Points ∼8%
LG G6
647 Points ∼35% +340%
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value)
Huawei Nova 2
47.3 fps ∼77%
LG G6
59 fps ∼96% +25%

Legend

 
Huawei Nova 2 HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris X Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC U Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P9 Plus HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Huawei Nova Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Huawei P9 Plus (Chrome 51)
70 Points ∼100% +153%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
58.6 Points ∼84% +112%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
56.628 Points ∼81% +104%
HTC U Ultra (Chrome 56)
45.084 Points ∼64% +63%
Huawei Nova (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
30.487 Points ∼44% +10%
Huawei Nova 2 (Chrome 60.0.3112.116)
27.692 Points ∼40%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
26.837 Points ∼38% -3%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei P9 Plus (Chrome 51)
12058 Points ∼100% +148%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
10208 Points ∼85% +110%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
9113 Points ∼76% +87%
HTC U Ultra (Chrome 56)
5511 Points ∼46% +13%
Huawei Nova 2 (Chrome 60.0.3112.116)
4864 Points ∼40%
Huawei Nova (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
4717 Points ∼39% -3%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
4424 Points ∼37% -9%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei Nova 2 (Chrome 60.0.3112.116)
8863 ms * ∼100%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
8741.5 ms * ∼99% +1%
Huawei Nova (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
8234.9 ms * ∼93% +7%
HTC U Ultra (Chrome 56)
4141 ms * ∼47% +53%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
3149 ms * ∼36% +64%
Huawei P9 Plus (Chrome 51)
2792.3 ms * ∼32% +68%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
2464.2 ms * ∼28% +72%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Huawei P9 Plus (Chrome 51)
130 Points ∼100% +37%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
122 Points ∼94% +28%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
107 Points ∼82% +13%
Huawei Nova 2 (Chrome 60.0.3112.116)
95 Points ∼73%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
86 Points ∼66% -9%
Huawei Nova (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
60 Points ∼46% -37%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei Nova 2BQ Aquaris X ProHonor 9HTC U UltraHuawei P9 PlusLG G6Huawei Nova
AndroBench 3-5
-14%
2%
18%
-2%
12%
0%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
36.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
49.77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
37%
34.64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
67.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
87%
24.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-31%
53.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
47%
47.69 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
32%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
68.88 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
78.69 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
14%
67.99 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
20%
62.48 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-9%
77.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
13%
79.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
15%
Random Write 4KB
25.41
12.07
-52%
32.7
29%
13.7
-46%
51.23
102%
16.58
-35%
44.63
76%
Random Read 4KB
69.03
37.97
-45%
55.7
-19%
84.2
22%
39.33
-43%
95.19
38%
38.19
-45%
Sequential Write 256KB
192.8
139.63
-28%
204
6%
164.7
-15%
140.38
-27%
122.85
-36%
75.01
-61%
Sequential Read 256KB
300.35
270.46
-10%
293
-2%
423.9
41%
284.27
-5%
428.67
43%
248.26
-17%
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high56 fps
comparado com
Motorola Moto X Play (min)
 615 MSM8939, Adreno 405
20
   ...
Lenovo Moto Z Play
 625, Adreno 506
56
Huawei P10 Plus
 Kirin 960, Mali-G71 MP8
56
Huawei Nova 2
 Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2
56
Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A
 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510
57
Honor 6X
 Kirin 655, Mali-T830 MP2
57
   ...
Nokia 8 (max)
 835, Adreno 540
60
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high28 fps
 very low30 fps
Carga Máxima
 37.2 °C33.8 °C36.4 °C 
 37.6 °C34.1 °C39.6 °C 
 36 °C35.6 °C37.9 °C 
Máximo: 39.6 °C
Médio: 36.5 °C
33 °C33.1 °C35.8 °C
33.2 °C34.4 °C35.8 °C
33.1 °C34.1 °C35.6 °C
Máximo: 35.8 °C
Médio: 34.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  30.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.631.22525.438.43125.330.14032.930.25033.631.96331.635.58028.424.51002726.912520.823.7160223920021.350.525020.849.531521.249.340019.458.250019.559.963017.763.680017.962.5100017.867125017.372.4160017.473.6200016.772.2250017.273.3315018.274.6400017.973.8500017.676.4630017.776.9800017.876.41000017.977.61250018.175.51600018.262.9SPL3085.7N1.361.9median 17.9Huawei Nova 2median 67Delta1.311.837.536.427.134.832.437.534.827.726.630.831.334.832.233.629.529.731.732.238.33634.933.72638.350.547.147.347.739.450.531.633.329.131.936.231.628.231.532.626.728.628.230.625.227.624.525.430.632.626.428.523.621.332.642.523.539.922.123.342.549.423.446.621.222.549.45524.65022.722.45559.531.553.326.121.359.563.528.755.421.818.463.567.126.358.620.117.567.169.230.256.820.317.569.270.337.65722.217.270.370.141.756.928.516.870.174.852.660.840.617.374.878.459.862.945.817.478.478.761.364.942.316.678.78265.166.247.517.38279.563.963.348.817.679.577.668.26248.917.677.67273.356.654.217.77261.673.24653.917.461.653.371.136.752.917.753.347.473.926.954.817.947.439.973.122.654.218.139.926.859.618.741.118.126.888.480.373.361.629.888.464.534.827.811.81.364.5median 63.5Huawei P9 Plusmedian 52.6median 55.4median 40.6median 17.7median 63.512.620.211.813.31.612.631.642.925.433.825.327.832.933.233.641.731.631.928.431.8272620.824.72228.621.336.520.85021.25519.45719.556.517.757.317.963.817.870.517.372.317.474.816.77817.276.918.279.417.981.417.678.217.774.217.873.917.968.618.170.818.2683088.31.366.5median 17.9Huawei Novamedian 68.61.312.1hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Huawei Nova 2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei P9 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.38 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 88% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei Nova audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.25 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.04 / 0.17 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.65 / 1.59 / 1.71 Watt
Carga midlight 4.61 / 5.84 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei Nova 2
2950 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Honor 9
3200 mAh
HTC U Ultra
3000 mAh
Huawei P9 Plus
3400 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Huawei Nova
3020 mAh
Power Consumption
-4%
-39%
-50%
4%
-14%
3%
Idle Minimum *
0.65
0.67
-3%
1.13
-74%
1
-54%
0.87
-34%
0.62
5%
0.61
6%
Idle Average *
1.59
1.7
-7%
2.25
-42%
2.41
-52%
1.2
25%
1.43
10%
1.83
-15%
Idle Maximum *
1.71
1.78
-4%
2.3
-35%
2.46
-44%
1.27
26%
1.48
13%
1.86
-9%
Load Average *
4.61
4.42
4%
4.89
-6%
6.8
-48%
4.69
-2%
5.52
-20%
3.71
20%
Load Maximum *
5.84
6.3
-8%
7.99
-37%
8.9
-52%
5.63
4%
10.47
-79%
5.19
11%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
22h 58min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
10h 02min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 51min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 32min
Huawei Nova 2
2950 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Honor 9
3200 mAh
HTC U Ultra
3000 mAh
Huawei P9 Plus
3400 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Huawei Nova
3020 mAh
Battery Runtime
10%
-8%
-8%
-0%
12%
26%
Reader / Idle
1378
1840
34%
1399
2%
1568
14%
1446
5%
1789
30%
1870
36%
H.264
711
644
-9%
564
-21%
605
-15%
776
9%
779
10%
717
1%
WiFi v1.3
602
730
21%
516
-14%
546
-9%
530
-12%
692
15%
873
45%
Load
272
254
-7%
278
2%
214
-21%
263
-3%
252
-7%
328
21%

Pro

+ Carcaça elegante em visual iPhone look
+ Tela brilhante
+ Dual SIM
+ USB Tipo C
+ Bluetooth 4.2 / aptX
+ Grande capacidade de armazenamento
+ Alto desempenho
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Carga rápida

Contra

- Dual SIM apenas híbrido
- Apenas USB 2.0
- Desempenho moderado do Wi-Fi
- Câmera apenas média
In review: Huawei Nova 2. Test model provided by Huawei Germany.
In review: Huawei Nova 2. Test model provided by Huawei Germany.

Com o Nova 2, a Huawei produziu um bom smartphone, que, com razão, pertence à gama média alta. O telefone Android de 5 polegadas convence com excelente qualidade de construção, fica confortavelmente na mão e parece ser de gama alta independentemente do ponto de vista. Junto com 4 GB de RAM e o ARM Mali-T830 MP2, seu SoC octa core HiSilicon Kirin 659 oferece um alto desempenho do sistema e torna o Nova 2 um dispositivo poli funcional, que pode processar sucintamente sites exigentes, bem como jogos de Android graficamente exigentes em sua tela Full HD brilhante. Outras vantagens são as longas durações da bateria, tempos de carregamento curtos e armazenamento livre relativamente grande, mesmo que a interface de usuário do EMUI da Huawei ocupe um pouco de sua capacidade de armazenamento.

Apesar de sua câmera frontal de 20 MP, o Nova 2 não é um "Selfie Superstar", como a Huawei o chama. Oferece desempenho de câmera sólido, mas não excelente.

Você só pode usar o recurso dual SIM do Nova 2 se você dispensar o uso de um cartão microSD, pois ele vem com um slot híbrido. Este não é um problema sério, dado que o espaço de armazenamento interno dificilmente será ocupado rapidamente. Você também pode superar o fato de que a porta USB Type-C suporte apenas velocidades 2.0 Infelizmente, o Wi-Fi modestamente rápido não é uma boa alternativa para transferências de dados mais rápidas para o smartphone. A câmera também foi um pouco decepcionante Não, não é ruim. Simplesmente não pode cumprir as altas expectativas.

Huawei Nova 2 - 10/02/2017 v6
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
88%
Teclado
69 / 75 → 92%
Mouse
88%
Conectividade
39 / 60 → 66%
Peso
93%
Bateria
93%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
22 / 63 → 35%
Desempenho da aplicação
53 / 70 → 75%
Temperatura
88%
Ruído
100%
Audio
74 / 91 → 81%
Camera
76%
Médio
74%
84%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Nova 2
Manuel Masiero, 2017-10-19 (Update: 2017-10-26)