Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P20

Dica interna? O Huawei P20 é 250 Euros mais barato que seu irmão Huawei P20 Pro, mas sua câmera dupla Leica está basicamente no mesmo nível e o hardware tem quase a mesma potência. Como o dispositivo de 5,8 polegadas compete com outros rivais de gama alta?
Huawei P20 (P20 Serie)
Processador
HiSilicon Kirin 970 8 x 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G72 MP12
Memória
4 GB 
Pantalha
5.80 polegadas 18.7:9, 2240 x 1080 pixel 429 PPI, capacitiva, LTPS, RGBW, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 116 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: USB-C, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, leitor de digitais, sensor de brilho, USB-C, USB-OTG, aptX, Miracast, WiFi Direct, VoWiFi, VoLTE
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM, UMTS (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE Cat. 18 (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40), Downloads up to 1.2 Gbps, dual-Nano SIM, head SAR 0.76 W/kg, body SAR 1.26 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.65 x 149.1 x 70.8
Bateria
3400 mAh, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 19 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 350 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 20 MPix Dual-camera 20 MP (f/1.6) + 12 MP (f/1.8), hybrid zoom, AIS, two-tone LED
Secondary Camera: 24 MPix f/​2.0, Videos @2160p/​30fps, Videos @720p/​960fps
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 1 alto-falante na borda inferior, Teclado: virtual, Cabo USB-C, PSU modular PSU, ferramenta SIM, adaptador de USB para fomes de 3,5 mm, guia de início rápido, cartão de garantia, EMUI 8.1, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
165 g, Suprimento de energia: 40 g
Preço
649 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

155 mm 73.88 mm 7.65 mm 174 g151.7 mm 75.4 mm 7.3 mm 158 g149.1 mm 70.8 mm 7.65 mm 165 g147.7 mm 68.7 mm 8.5 mm 163 g148.6 mm 71.2 mm 7.4 mm 145 g145.7 mm 69.7 mm 7.8 mm 143 g145.3 mm 69.3 mm 6.98 mm 144 g138.4 mm 67.3 mm 7.3 mm 148 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
LG V30
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
703 MBit/s +77%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
519 MBit/s +31%
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
437 MBit/s +10%
Huawei P20
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
397 MBit/s
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
354 MBit/s -11%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
343 (154min) MBit/s -14%
Google Pixel 2
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
240 MBit/s -40%
Huawei P20 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
233 MBit/s -41%
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
915 MBit/s +44%
LG V30
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
657 MBit/s +3%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
652 MBit/s +2%
Huawei P20
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
637 MBit/s
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
635 MBit/s 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s -41%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
308 (48.8min) MBit/s -52%
Google Pixel 2
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
287 MBit/s -55%
Huawei P20 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 64 GB eMMC Flash
198 MBit/s -69%
Huawei P20: Overview
Huawei P20: Overview
Huawei P20: Lake
Huawei P20: Lake
Huawei P20: Turning Point
Huawei P20: Turning Point
Garmin Edge 500: Overview
Garmin Edge 500: Overview
Garmin Edge 500: Lake
Garmin Edge 500: Lake
Garmin Edge 500: Turning Point
Garmin Edge 500: Turning Point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
734
cd/m²
740
cd/m²
750
cd/m²
739
cd/m²
753
cd/m²
762
cd/m²
744
cd/m²
752
cd/m²
761
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 762 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 748.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.99 cd/m²
iluminação: 96 %
iluminação com acumulador: 753 cd/m²
Contraste: 2035:1 (Preto: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.18
Huawei P20
LTPS, 2240x1080, 5.80
Apple iPhone 8
IPS True Tone, 1334x750, 4.70
Google Pixel 2
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.00
Huawei P10
LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.10
Huawei P20 Lite
IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84
Huawei P20 Pro
OLED, 2240x1080, 6.10
LG V30
OLED, 2880x1440, 6.00
Samsung Galaxy S9
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.80
Screen
-11%
-30%
-104%
-122%
-6%
-133%
-23%
Brightness middle
753
604
-20%
396
-47%
547
-27%
528
-30%
569
-24%
432
-43%
529
-30%
Brightness
748
580
-22%
404
-46%
556
-26%
525
-30%
578
-23%
428
-43%
527
-30%
Brightness Distribution
96
91
-5%
91
-5%
86
-10%
89
-7%
95
-1%
87
-9%
96
0%
Black Level *
0.37
0.44
-19%
0.43
-16%
0.51
-38%
Contrast
2035
1373
-33%
1272
-37%
1035
-49%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.3
1.2
8%
1.7
-31%
4.8
-269%
4.7
-262%
1.3
-0%
4.18
-222%
1.4
-8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.3
2.3
-0%
4
-74%
8.8
-283%
8.9
-287%
2.1
9%
8.53
-271%
4
-74%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.7
1.6
6%
1.3
24%
4.5
-165%
6.4
-276%
1.6
6%
5.3
-212%
1.6
6%
Gamma
2.18 101%
2.25 98%
2.3 96%
2.39 92%
2.22 99%
2.31 95%
2.33 94%
2.16 102%
CCT
66.76 9736%
6688 97%
6483 100%
7194 90%
7987 81%
6401 102%
7487 87%
6358 102%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 13.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.2 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20
179393 Points
Apple iPhone 8
204270 Points +14%
Google Pixel 2
166939 Points -7%
Huawei P10
140084 Points -22%
Huawei P20 Lite
68232 Points -62%
Huawei P20 Pro
179709 Points 0%
LG V30
173749 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S9
217950 Points +21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (173653 - 181973, n=8)
177915 Points -1%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20
200756 Points
Google Pixel 2
207530 Points +3%
Huawei P10
170015 Points -15%
Huawei P20 Lite
88550 Points -56%
Huawei P20 Pro
207959 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S9
243861 Points +21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (152773 - 212278, n=6)
197811 Points -1%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P20
8700 Points
Google Pixel 2
8550 Points -2%
Huawei P10
7341 Points -16%
Huawei P20 Lite
5704 Points -34%
Huawei P20 Pro
8115 Points -7%
LG V30
6854 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy S9
5736 Points -34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (8115 - 9326, n=8)
8537 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)
15091 Points +73%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P20
7002 Points
Google Pixel 2
7223 Points +3%
Huawei P10
6206 Points -11%
Huawei P20 Lite
4793 Points -32%
Huawei P20 Pro
6982 Points 0%
LG V30
5603 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S9
5291 Points -24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6293 - 7046, n=8)
6860 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)
10872 Points +55%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P20
3288 Points
Google Pixel 2
3360 Points +2%
Huawei P10
2621 Points -20%
Huawei P20 Lite
1445 Points -56%
Huawei P20 Pro
3271 Points -1%
LG V30
2702 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3285 Points 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2174 - 3374, n=8)
3125 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)
5759 Points +75%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P20
5797 Points
Google Pixel 2
5918 Points +2%
Huawei P10
3830 Points -34%
Huawei P20 Lite
3109 Points -46%
Huawei P20 Pro
5965 Points +3%
LG V30
4238 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy S9
6234 Points +8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (3795 - 5987, n=8)
5387 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)
9672 Points +67%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P20
4154 Points
Google Pixel 2
2942 Points -29%
Huawei P10
2778 Points -33%
Huawei P20 Lite
1930 Points -54%
Huawei P20 Pro
4050 Points -3%
LG V30
2091 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy S9
2669 Points -36%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2417 - 4578, n=8)
3946 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)
6267 Points +51%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P20
3697 Points
Google Pixel 2
6052 Points +64%
Huawei P10
4115 Points +11%
Huawei P20 Lite
848 Points -77%
Huawei P20 Pro
3725 Points +1%
LG V30
5949 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy S9
6373 Points +72%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2231 - 4397, n=8)
3638 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)
14220 Points +285%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P20
1313 Points
Google Pixel 2
1210 Points -8%
Huawei P10
1077 Points -18%
Huawei P20 Lite
858 Points -35%
Huawei P20 Pro
1273 Points -3%
LG V30
1009 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy S9
1099 Points -16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1091 - 1316, n=8)
1245 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)
1495 Points +14%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20
1886 Points
Apple iPhone 8
4162 Points +121%
Google Pixel 2
1924 Points +2%
Huawei P10
1899 Points +1%
Huawei P20 Lite
935 Points -50%
Huawei P20 Pro
1922 Points +2%
LG V30
1900 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3688 Points +96%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1883 - 1922, n=8)
1901 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (934 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years)
5228 Points +177%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20
6557 Points
Apple iPhone 8
10380 Points +58%
Google Pixel 2
6256 Points -5%
Huawei P10
6521 Points -1%
Huawei P20 Lite
3749 Points -43%
Huawei P20 Pro
6756 Points +3%
LG V30
6078 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S9
8786 Points +34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6557 - 6792, n=8)
6697 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years)
14045 Points +114%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 2
7462 Points
Huawei P10
9492 Points
Huawei P20 Lite
3116 Points
Huawei P20 Pro
8025 Points
LG V30
8016 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9
6219 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (5779 - 9015, n=6)
8080 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 18432, n=72, last 2 years)
10872 Points
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20
30845 Points
Apple iPhone 8
62006 Points +101%
Google Pixel 2
40116 Points +30%
Huawei P10
27692 Points -10%
Huawei P20 Lite
12048 Points -61%
Huawei P20 Pro
30176 Points -2%
LG V30
34139 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S9
41093 Points +33%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (20022 - 31605, n=8)
29035 Points -6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20
34146 Points
Apple iPhone 8
112424 Points +229%
Google Pixel 2
55247 Points +62%
Huawei P10
35964 Points +5%
Huawei P20 Lite
11713 Points -66%
Huawei P20 Pro
33472 Points -2%
LG V30
55271 Points +62%
Samsung Galaxy S9
48433 Points +42%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (22429 - 36231, n=8)
32596 Points -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P20
23046 Points
Apple iPhone 8
24131 Points +5%
Google Pixel 2
20482 Points -11%
Huawei P10
15341 Points -33%
Huawei P20 Lite
13387 Points -42%
Huawei P20 Pro
22441 Points -3%
LG V30
14601 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy S9
26851 Points +17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (14556 - 23046, n=8)
21027 Points -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P20
3354 Points
Google Pixel 2
4977 Points +48%
Huawei P10
2649 Points -21%
Huawei P20 Lite
138 Points -96%
Huawei P20 Pro
3223 Points -4%
LG V30
4738 Points +41%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3911 Points +17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1943 - 3487, n=8)
3155 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)
3766 Points +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P20
3550 Points
Google Pixel 2
6040 Points +70%
Huawei P10
2816 Points -21%
Huawei P20 Lite
109 Points -97%
Huawei P20 Pro
3335 Points -6%
LG V30
5895 Points +66%
Samsung Galaxy S9
4569 Points +29%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1954 - 3734, n=8)
3305 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)
4186 Points +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P20
2811 Points
Apple iPhone 8
1774 Points -37%
Google Pixel 2
3080 Points +10%
Huawei P10
2193 Points -22%
Huawei P20 Lite
1760 Points -37%
Huawei P20 Pro
2885 Points +3%
LG V30
2808 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9
2600 Points -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1906 - 2902, n=8)
2732 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)
3082 Points +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P20
2982 Points
Apple iPhone 8
2421 Points -19%
Google Pixel 2
3733 Points +25%
Huawei P10
2274 Points -24%
Huawei P20 Lite
257 Points -91%
Huawei P20 Pro
2996 Points 0%
LG V30
3635 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3244 Points +9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2850 - 2999, n=8)
2958 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=105, last 2 years)
2755 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P20
3040 Points
Apple iPhone 8
2581 Points -15%
Google Pixel 2
3974 Points +31%
Huawei P10
2409 Points -21%
Huawei P20 Lite
207 Points -93%
Huawei P20 Pro
3017 Points -1%
LG V30
3903 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3553 Points +17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2844 - 3040, n=8)
2994 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=105, last 2 years)
2751 Points -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P20
2795 Points
Apple iPhone 8
1989 Points -29%
Google Pixel 2
3078 Points +10%
Huawei P10
1902 Points -32%
Huawei P20 Lite
1757 Points -37%
Huawei P20 Pro
2926 Points +5%
LG V30
2931 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S9
2486 Points -11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2582 - 2931, n=8)
2842 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=105, last 2 years)
3163 Points +13%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P20
59 fps
Apple iPhone 8
119.8 fps +103%
Google Pixel 2
59 fps 0%
Huawei P10
55 fps -7%
Huawei P20 Lite
19 fps -68%
Huawei P20 Pro
60 fps +2%
LG V30
60 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S9
60 fps +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (42 - 60, n=8)
57.4 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)
84.6 fps +43%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P20
125 fps
Apple iPhone 8
161.3 fps +29%
Google Pixel 2
112 fps -10%
Huawei P10
69 fps -45%
Huawei P20 Lite
19 fps -85%
Huawei P20 Pro
121 fps -3%
LG V30
113 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy S9
144 fps +15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (45 - 125, n=8)
108 fps -14%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)
247 fps +98%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P20
56 fps
Apple iPhone 8
114.5 fps +104%
Google Pixel 2
54 fps -4%
Huawei P10
32 fps -43%
Huawei P20 Lite
8.9 fps -84%
Huawei P20 Pro
54 fps -4%
LG V30
35 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy S9
45 fps -20%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (26 - 56, n=8)
50.4 fps -10%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)
72.2 fps +29%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P20
59 fps
Apple iPhone 8
70.8 fps +20%
Google Pixel 2
52 fps -12%
Huawei P10
30 fps -49%
Huawei P20 Lite
8.7 fps -85%
Huawei P20 Pro
61 fps +3%
LG V30
59 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9
73 fps +24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (23 - 66, n=8)
54.6 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years)
140.6 fps +138%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P20
39 fps
Apple iPhone 8
109.7 fps +181%
Google Pixel 2
40 fps +3%
Huawei P10
25 fps -36%
Huawei P20 Lite
5.6 fps -86%
Huawei P20 Pro
36 fps -8%
LG V30
19 fps -51%
Samsung Galaxy S9
24 fps -38%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (18 - 39, n=8)
33.6 fps -14%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)
60.9 fps +56%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P20
39 fps
Apple iPhone 8
54 fps +38%
Google Pixel 2
31 fps -21%
Huawei P10
24 fps -38%
Huawei P20 Lite
5.2 fps -87%
Huawei P20 Pro
39 fps 0%
LG V30
40 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy S9
46 fps +18%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (19 - 39, n=8)
33.9 fps -13%
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)
99 fps +154%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P20
23 fps
Google Pixel 2
25 fps +9%
Huawei P10
16 fps -30%
Huawei P20 Lite
3.3 fps -86%
Huawei P20 Pro
22 fps -4%
LG V30
13 fps -43%
Samsung Galaxy S9
14 fps -39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (10 - 23, n=8)
19.8 fps -14%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)
43.4 fps +89%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P20
23 fps
Google Pixel 2
24 fps +4%
Huawei P10
15 fps -35%
Huawei P20 Lite
3.1 fps -87%
Huawei P20 Pro
23 fps 0%
LG V30
24 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy S9
28 fps +22%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (11 - 23, n=8)
20.4 fps -11%
Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)
59.9 fps +160%

Legend

 
Huawei P20 HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 8 Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
 
Google Pixel 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei P10 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei P20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 8
206.7 Points +268%
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)
104.3 Points +86%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
67.7 Points +20%
Google Pixel 2 (Chrome 62)
64.8 Points +15%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
58.3 Points +4%
Huawei P10 (Chrome 56)
57.9 Points +3%
Huawei P20 (Chrome 66.0.3359.126)
56.2 Points
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
52.9 Points -6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (33.1 - 58.6, n=8)
51.4 Points -9%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
23.42 Points -58%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 8
34163 Points +198%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years)
33503 Points +192%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
15233 Points +33%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
11584 Points +1%
Huawei P20 (Chrome 66.0.3359.126)
11468 Points
Google Pixel 2 (Chrome 62)
11380 Points -1%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
10506 Points -8%
Huawei P10 (Chrome 56)
10236 Points -11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6692 - 11838, n=8)
10111 Points -12%
Huawei P20 Lite
4191 Points -63%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
10788 ms * -171%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (3591 - 6221, n=8)
4378 ms * -10%
Huawei P20 (Chrome 66.0.3359.126)
3979 ms *
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
3852 ms * +3%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
3630 ms * +9%
Google Pixel 2 (Chrome 62)
3415 ms * +14%
Huawei P10 (Chrome 56)
3129 ms * +21%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
2078 ms * +48%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * +60%
Apple iPhone 8
731 ms * +82%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Apple iPhone 8
359 Points +97%
Google Pixel 2 (Chrome 62)
190 Points +4%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
182 Points 0%
Huawei P20 (Chrome 66.0.3359.126)
182 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (119 - 187, n=8)
165.4 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
163 Points -10%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
138 Points -24%
Huawei P10 (Chrome 56)
136 Points -25%
Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63)
86 Points -53%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei P20Google Pixel 2Huawei P10Huawei P20 LiteHuawei P20 ProLG V30Samsung Galaxy S9Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-20%
-1%
-46%
0%
-40%
-23%
8%
174%
Sequential Read 256KB
827
758
-8%
738
-11%
293.9
-64%
832
1%
669
-19%
815
-1%
Sequential Write 256KB
193.6
196.2
1%
189.8
-2%
198.3
2%
196.7
2%
193.2
0%
206.9
7%
Random Read 4KB
147
173.1
18%
168.4
15%
48.19
-67%
144.3
-2%
78.2
-47%
131
-11%
Random Write 4KB
161.5
18.03
-89%
152.3
-6%
71.1
-56%
160.5
-1%
10.21
-94%
23.07
-86%
131.6 ?(18.2 - 290, n=113)
-19%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
54.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
83.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
62.8
79.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
32.19 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
69 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
47.2
67.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high59 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
Carga Máxima
 36.2 °C36.7 °C36.1 °C 
 36.6 °C36.5 °C36.1 °C 
 35.9 °C36.5 °C35.8 °C 
Máximo: 36.7 °C
Médio: 36.3 °C
31.7 °C32.3 °C34.5 °C
32.2 °C33.3 °C35.9 °C
32.1 °C33.8 °C35.6 °C
Máximo: 35.9 °C
Médio: 33.5 °C
alimentação elétrica  29.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.239.32532.941.83137.229.34031.739.95039.640.86328.333.18027.335.410026.93212526.7391602440.220020.949.125020.957.231519.559.740018.553.550017.561.463017.56380015.760.2100015.856.2125016.663.5160015.864.3200015.458.2250015.569.531501670.1400015.873.150001671.5630016.369.7800016.365.21000016.261.81250016.4511600016.435.7SPL28.679.8N1.143.8median 16.4median 60.2Delta2.27.235.24232.941.837.230.431.736.639.641.828.331.427.331.526.934.226.731.42429.620.938.320.947.619.546.618.55417.562.817.559.415.758.915.86316.666.415.869.315.471.315.573.41674.815.875.91676.516.371.216.371.616.271.316.467.516.459.628.684.11.153.6median 16.4median 632.211.335.240.532.942.437.233.831.73039.635.128.33127.327.326.930.626.738.62446.820.951.720.955.319.554.218.556.917.561.817.565.315.769.315.872.516.675.215.869.415.471.915.573.91675.315.876.81674.516.370.616.371.316.267.216.459.716.44928.684.91.160.3median 16.4median 67.22.28.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei P20Huawei P20 LiteHuawei P20 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei P20 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei P20 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei P20 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.05 / 0.22 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.67 / 2.05 / 2.11 Watt
Carga midlight 6.15 / 8.09 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Huawei P20
3400 mAh
Apple iPhone 8
1821 mAh
Google Pixel 2
2700 mAh
Huawei P10
3200 mAh
Huawei P20 Lite
3000 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
LG V30
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9
3000 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
24%
12%
-10%
5%
31%
21%
36%
-10%
5%
Idle Minimum *
0.67
0.54
19%
0.99
-48%
0.83
-24%
0.98
-46%
0.84
-25%
0.72
-7%
0.65
3%
0.978 ?(0.67 - 1.4, n=8)
-46%
Idle Average *
2.05
1.63
20%
1.35
34%
2.1
-2%
2
2%
1.54
25%
1.37
33%
0.81
60%
2.12 ?(1.15 - 2.7, n=8)
-3%
Idle Maximum *
2.11
1.67
21%
1.37
35%
2.18
-3%
2.11
-0%
1.57
26%
1.41
33%
0.92
56%
2.51 ?(1.23 - 4.3, n=8)
-19%
Load Average *
6.15
2.74
55%
3.25
47%
6.57
-7%
3.9
37%
2.47
60%
3.46
44%
4.76
23%
5.01 ?(2.47 - 6.5, n=8)
19%
Load Maximum *
8.09
7.78
4%
8.56
-6%
9.32
-15%
5.62
31%
2.49
69%
7.83
3%
5.16
36%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
31h 28min
WiFi Websurfing
13h 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 30min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 55min
Huawei P20
3400 mAh
Apple iPhone 8
1821 mAh
Google Pixel 2
2700 mAh
Huawei P10
3200 mAh
Huawei P20 Lite
3000 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
LG V30
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-22%
-32%
-17%
-37%
-1%
-3%
-37%
Reader / Idle
1888
1629
-14%
1457
-23%
1540
-18%
750
-60%
1727
-9%
1914
1%
1182
-37%
H.264
810
698
-14%
564
-30%
582
-28%
470
-42%
784
-3%
822
1%
609
-25%
WiFi v1.3
818
585
-28%
575
-30%
966
18%
582
-29%
744
-9%
774
-5%
474
-42%
Load
295
202
-32%
161
-45%
176
-40%
247
-16%
345
17%
267
-9%
164
-44%

Pro

+ SoC de gama alta
+ Carcaça elegante e muito sólida
+ 128 GB de armazenamento
+ LTE Cat. 18, VoLTE, VoWiFi
+ USB Type C (USB 3.1 Gen 1) 1
+ WLAN com tecnologia MIMO
+ aptX HD
+ Excelente câmera dupla Leica
+ Tela brilhante
+ Apresentação de cores precisa
+ Longas durações da bateria
+ PSU de 10 W de carga rápida

Contra

- Sem slot microSD
- Sem conector de headset de 3,5 mm
- Sem certificação IP
In review: Huawei P20. Test model courtesy of Huawei Germany.
In review: Huawei P20. Test model courtesy of Huawei Germany.

O Huawei P20 é um excelente smartphone de gama alta e marca muitas caixas certas. Além do excelente desempenho do sistema, o smartphone de 5,8 polegadas convence com boa qualidade de construção, o mais recente sistema operacional Android e uma tela brilhante. Esta última apresenta cores precisas e é especial graças ao seu formato incomum de 18,7: 9 (2240 x 1080 pixels). LTE Cat. 18, a porta USB-C com USB 31. Gen. 1 funcionalidade, longos tempos de duração da bateria, a PSU de carga rápida fornecida e, no nosso caso, um módulo de duplo SIM com dupla VoLTE/VoWiFi, são outras vantagens.

O Huawei P20 tem uma das melhores câmeras de smartphone que você pode obter agora. O Huawei P20 Pro é ainda (ligeiramente) melhor, mas é 250 euros mais caro.

Queremos mencionar uma vantagem específica: Graças à sua câmera dupla Leica, o Huawei P20 tira fotos excelentes sem muito esforço do usuário - basta apontar e disparar, a IA da câmera cuida do resto. O “pequeno” Huawei é definitivamente uma recomendação para os entusiastas da câmera, embora o Huawei P20 Pro ofereça ainda mais recursos com sua câmera tripla Leica. No entanto, o modelo top é cerca de 250 Euros mais caro que o P20 e não é mais rápido, já que ambos os smartphones são equipados com o mesmo SoC Kirin SoC.

Ainda existem algumas falhas. Perdemos uma certificação IP para o Huawei P20, que está disponível no Huawei P20 Pro (IP67) à prova de água e poeira. Nem todo usuário vai gostar da decisão de remover o slot microSD e o conector de 3,5 mm para fones de ouvido.

Huawei P20 - 05/04/2018 v6(old)
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
88%
Teclado
71 / 75 → 95%
Mouse
91%
Conectividade
66 / 60 → 100%
Peso
91%
Bateria
95%
Pantalha
93%
Desempenho do jogos
64 / 63 → 100%
Desempenho da aplicação
71 / 70 → 100%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
100%
Audio
68 / 91 → 75%
Camera
90%
Médio
83%
91%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P20
Manuel Masiero, 2018-05-23 (Update: 2018-06- 1)