Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Y6 2017

Baixo preço - grande bateria. O Huawei Y6 (2017) apresenta uma grande bateria e é ambicioso, mas com um preço bastante baixo. Será que pode suportar a concorrência ou a Huawei calculou muito justamente? Descubra mais em nossa análise.
Huawei Y6 2017 (Y6 Serie)
Processador
Mediatek MT6737T 4 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A53
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
Memória
2048 MB 
Pantalha
5.00 polegadas 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.6 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3,5mm-Audioport, Card Reader: Porta de áudio de 3,5mm, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Beschleunigungssensor, Annäherungssensor, Kompass
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B7/​B8/​B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.85 x 143.8 x 72.2
Bateria
11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/​2.0, Kontrast-AF, Dual-LED-Blitz
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix LED-Blitz
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Mono-Lautsprecher an der Unterseite, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Ladegerät, USB-Kabel, Headset, HiCare, Telefonmanager, Designs, 24 Meses Garantia, UKW-Radio, LTE Cat.4 (Download 150 Mbit/s, Upload 50 MBit/s), SAR-Wert: 0,42 W/kg (Kopf), 1,20 W/kg (Körper), fanless
peso
150 g, Suprimento de energia: 48 g
Preço
160 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Huawei Y6 (2017)
Huawei Y6 (2017)
Huawei Y6 (2017)
Huawei Y6 (2017)
Huawei Y6 (2017)
Huawei Y6 (2017)
Huawei Y6 (2017)
Huawei Y6 (2017)

Size Comparison

144 mm 72.3 mm 9.5 mm 139 g143.8 mm 72.2 mm 8.85 mm 150 g144 mm 69 mm 8 mm 147 g143 mm 71.4 mm 8.68 mm 141 g143.2 mm 70.3 mm 8.2 mm 148 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Sony Xperia E5
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
78.7 MBit/s +62%
Nokia 3
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
76.6 MBit/s +57%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, Exynos 7570, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53.5 MBit/s +10%
Gigaset GS170
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.9 MBit/s +2%
Huawei Y6 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Nokia 3
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
81.1 MBit/s +86%
Sony Xperia E5
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
79.9 MBit/s +83%
Gigaset GS170
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.4 MBit/s +13%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, Exynos 7570, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.9 MBit/s +8%
Huawei Y6 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
43.6 MBit/s
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – total
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – total
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – crossroads
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – crossroads
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – wood
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – wood
GPS Huawei Y6 – total
GPS Huawei Y6 – total
GPS Huawei Y6 – crossroads
GPS Huawei Y6 – crossroads
GPS Huawei Y6 – wood
GPS Huawei Y6 – wood

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
412
cd/m²
433
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
411
cd/m²
438
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
417
cd/m²
438
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 458 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 432.1 cd/m² Minimum: 4.51 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 438 cd/m²
Contraste: 3369:1 (Preto: 0.13 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
95.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Huawei Y6 2017
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
Nokia 3
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
Gigaset GS170
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
Sony Xperia E5
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
PLS, 1280x720, 5.00
Screen
-45%
-93%
-27%
-18%
Brightness middle
438
481
10%
418
-5%
538
23%
502
15%
Brightness
432
469
9%
418
-3%
534
24%
494
14%
Brightness Distribution
90
84
-7%
92
2%
96
7%
89
-1%
Black Level *
0.13
0.22
-69%
0.45
-246%
0.33
-154%
0.35
-169%
Contrast
3369
2186
-35%
929
-72%
1630
-52%
1434
-57%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.8
8.1
-69%
9.7
-102%
5.7
-19%
4.6
4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
11.4
15.4
-35%
18.9
-66%
11
4%
8
30%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.2
8.5
-166%
11.3
-253%
4.7
-47%
2.5
22%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.16 102%
2.27 97%
2.51 88%
2.29 96%
CCT
7090 92%
9014 72%
10414 62%
7264 89%
6351 102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
50 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 27 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2017
40981 Points
Nokia 3
27703 Points -32%
Gigaset GS170
30144 Points -26%
Sony Xperia E5
32477 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
35669 Points -13%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2017
4607 Points
Nokia 3
3439 Points -25%
Gigaset GS170
3344 Points -27%
Sony Xperia E5
3817 Points -17%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2017
3487 Points
Nokia 3
2568 Points -26%
Gigaset GS170
2600 Points -25%
Sony Xperia E5
2785 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
3436 Points -1%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2017
839 Points
Nokia 3
551 Points -34%
Gigaset GS170
538 Points -36%
Sony Xperia E5
567 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
704 Points -16%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2017
1354 Points
Nokia 3
1081 Points -20%
Gigaset GS170
1170 Points -14%
Sony Xperia E5
1091 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1395 Points +3%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2017
1288 Points
Nokia 3
703 Points -45%
Gigaset GS170
610 Points -53%
Sony Xperia E5
552 Points -57%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1055 Points -18%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2017
386 Points
Nokia 3
211 Points -45%
Gigaset GS170
210 Points -46%
Sony Xperia E5
280 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
252 Points -35%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2017
734 Points
Nokia 3
575 Points -22%
Gigaset GS170
558 Points -24%
Sony Xperia E5
639 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
662 Points -10%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2017
680 Points
Nokia 3
556 Points -18%
Gigaset GS170
581 Points -15%
Sony Xperia E5
556 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
634 Points -7%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2017
1903 Points
Nokia 3
1520 Points -20%
Gigaset GS170
1595 Points -16%
Sony Xperia E5
1527 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1858 Points -2%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2017
1238 Points
Nokia 3
1045 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1135 Points -8%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2017
6858 Points
Nokia 3
3665 Points -47%
Gigaset GS170
3666 Points -47%
Sony Xperia E5
5200 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
4381 Points -36%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2017
6184 Points
Nokia 3
3177 Points -49%
Gigaset GS170
3167 Points -49%
Sony Xperia E5
4615 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
3725 Points -40%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2017
11088 Points
Nokia 3
7925 Points -29%
Gigaset GS170
8178 Points -26%
Sony Xperia E5
9349 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
11426 Points +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2017
267 Points
Nokia 3
152 Points -43%
Gigaset GS170
152 Points -43%
Sony Xperia E5
212 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
115 Points -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2017
221 Points
Nokia 3
124 Points -44%
Gigaset GS170
227 Points +3%
Sony Xperia E5
175 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
92 Points -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2017
967 Points
Nokia 3
745 Points -23%
Gigaset GS170
781 Points -19%
Sony Xperia E5
817 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
925 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2017
176 Points
Nokia 3
106 Points -40%
Gigaset GS170
93 Points -47%
Sony Xperia E5
124 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
79 Points -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2017
143 Points
Nokia 3
85 Points -41%
Gigaset GS170
74 Points -48%
Sony Xperia E5
100 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
63 Points -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2017
971 Points
Nokia 3
686 Points -29%
Gigaset GS170
772 Points -20%
Sony Xperia E5
835 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
923 Points -5%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2017
17 fps
Nokia 3
10 fps -41%
Gigaset GS170
11 fps -35%
Sony Xperia E5
15 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
11 fps -35%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2017
11 fps
Nokia 3
6 fps -45%
Gigaset GS170
6 fps -45%
Sony Xperia E5
8.4 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
6.8 fps -38%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2017
8.1 fps
Nokia 3
4.5 fps -44%
Gigaset GS170
4.8 fps -41%
Sony Xperia E5
6 fps -26%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
5.4 fps -33%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2017
3.9 fps
Nokia 3
2.2 fps -44%
Gigaset GS170
2.2 fps -44%
Sony Xperia E5
3 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
2.6 fps -33%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2017
6 fps
Nokia 3
3.2 fps -47%
Gigaset GS170
3.4 fps -43%
Sony Xperia E5
3.4 fps -43%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
3.8 fps -37%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2017
2.5 fps
Nokia 3
1.4 fps -44%
Gigaset GS170
1.4 fps -44%
Sony Xperia E5
1.9 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
1.7 fps -32%

Legend

 
Huawei Y6 2017 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 3 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Gigaset GS170 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia E5 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 Samsung Exynos 7570 Quad, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Sony Xperia E5 (Chrome Version 58)
17.89 Points +1%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
17.64 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59)
17.17 Points -3%
Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59)
14.34 Points -19%
Nokia 3 (Chrome 59)
13.97 Points -21%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
3092 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59)
2921 Points -6%
Sony Xperia E5 (Chrome Version 58)
2910 Points -6%
Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59)
2284 Points -26%
Nokia 3 (Chrome 59)
2269 Points -27%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Nokia 3 (Chrome 59)
16759 ms * -37%
Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59)
16723 ms * -36%
Sony Xperia E5 (Chrome Version 58)
13232 ms * -8%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59)
12791 ms * -4%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
12255 ms *
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
65 Points
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (Chrome 59)
60 Points -8%
Nokia 3 (Chrome 59)
49 Points -25%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei Y6 2017Nokia 3Gigaset GS170Sony Xperia E5Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
AndroBench 3-5
1%
-26%
14%
12%
Sequential Read 256KB
202.6
181
-11%
197.9
-2%
209.7
4%
177.7
-12%
Sequential Write 256KB
66.9
34
-49%
44.79
-33%
83.1
24%
51
-24%
Random Read 4KB
25.93
17.7
-32%
18.34
-29%
26.04
0%
24
-7%
Random Write 4KB
20.54
5.5
-73%
10.45
-49%
9.84
-52%
9.5
-54%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
48.4
64.3
33%
37.41 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-23%
65 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
34%
70.3
45%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
26.4
62.9
138%
21.34 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-19%
45.56 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
73%
59.6
126%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high24 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
Carga Máxima
 34.3 °C33.3 °C33.9 °C 
 35.3 °C33.8 °C36.3 °C 
 36.2 °C34 °C35.5 °C 
Máximo: 36.3 °C
Médio: 34.7 °C
32.8 °C34.3 °C33.5 °C
31.8 °C34.8 °C35.1 °C
31.8 °C34.7 °C35.5 °C
Máximo: 35.5 °C
Médio: 33.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  38.7 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.629.929.62527.928.927.93128.83028.84036.647.836.65030.534.230.56325.726.325.78024.528.524.510028.131.728.112538.536.238.516030.423.430.420036.121.736.12504020.74031543.919.643.940047.52147.550053.820.253.863059.818.759.880064.718.864.7100065.717.665.7125067.117.667.1160069.516.869.5200070.116.370.1250072.816.472.8315073.916.173.9400075.916.275.9500073.81673.8630070.315.970.3800070.216.170.21000073.61673.61250068.815.868.81600053.815.953.8SPL83.429.983.4N52.11.452.1median 65.7median 17.6median 65.7Delta11.52.811.528.231.128.230.330.130.329.329.929.333.634.433.62834.62827.229.327.229.232.229.231.934.131.939.836.939.836.423.836.448.421.548.451.720.951.757.121.357.159.819.759.865.820.165.867.618.567.667.719.367.769.517.869.567.817.467.867.516.467.567.616.467.667.916.667.97116.17174.716.174.77116.17161166158.716.158.758.916.158.951.31651.339.81639.880.930.180.947.91.447.9median 61median 17.4median 618.82.98.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei Y6 2017Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
Huawei Y6 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
25h 22min
WiFi Websurfing
10h 54min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 33min
Carga (máximo brilho)
5h 02min
Huawei Y6 2017
3000 mAh
Nokia 3
2630 mAh
Gigaset GS170
2500 mAh
Sony Xperia E5
2300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
2400 mAh
Battery Runtime
-12%
-32%
-35%
6%
Reader / Idle
1522
1258
-17%
1425
-6%
H.264
693
628
-9%
819
18%
WiFi v1.3
654
552
-16%
442
-32%
422
-35%
722
10%
Load
302
283
-6%
305
1%

Pro

+ Carcaça resistente
+ Dificilmente esquenta
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Alto desempenho do sistema
+ Acesso rápido à memória
+ Tela com alto contraste
+ Botão físico com configuração livre
+ Slot microSD dedicado

Contra

- Wi-Fi lento
- Poucas bandas LTE
- Vários aplicativos publicitários estão pré-instalados
- Qualidade de voz modesta durante chamadas com viva-vos
- As fotos da câmera muitas vezes saem embaçadas
- Acesso lento ao micro-SD
In review:: Huawei Y6. Test model provided by Huawei Germany.
In review:: Huawei Y6. Test model provided by Huawei Germany.

A Huawei recentemente anunciou que não querem mais produzir smartphones de nível de entrada devido às baixas margens. Isso é compreensível, mas um pouco triste em vista do Huawei Y6 (2017), bem feito. O aparelho oferece mais desempenho do que o habitual em sua classe de preço e uma bateria grande, o que possibilita durações decentes da bateria. Infelizmente, a bateria não pode mais ser substituída, o que é uma tendência nos dispositivos atuais.

O aparelho está bem equipado com slot microSD e suporte para dois SIMs. A carcaça dificilmente é mais pesada e maior do que a de aparelhos comparáveis, apesar da bateria maior. Sobre o design, o Y6 não é nada especial, mas a qualidade de construção e estabilidade do chassi é decente.

As queixas são o Wi-Fi lento e as poucas bandas LTE, o medíocre equipamento-livres através do alto-falante e o microfone excessivamente sensível. A qualidade da câmera é bastante modesta e a tela é um pouco mais escura do que a de muitos concorrentes.

O Huawei Y6 (2017) combina excelente desempenho do sistema e longa duração da bateria. A câmera é a fraqueza do dispositivo, que, de outra maneira, oferece uma boa relação preço-desempenho.

Para resumir, o Huawei Y6 (2017) é uma recomendação para todos aqueles que desejam alto desempenho e boas durações da bateria por pouco dinheiro, mas não consideram a qualidade da imagem da câmera muito importante.

Huawei Y6 2017 - 08/28/2017 v6(old)
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
79%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
29 / 60 → 49%
Peso
92%
Bateria
93%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
11 / 63 → 17%
Desempenho da aplicação
41 / 70 → 59%
Temperatura
91%
Ruído
100%
Audio
48 / 91 → 53%
Camera
62%
Médio
68%
80%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Y6 2017
Florian Wimmer, 2017-09- 7 (Update: 2017-09-12)