Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Lenovo Z5 Pro

Marcus Herbrich (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 02/28/2019

It slides! O Z5 Pro é a interpretação da Lenovo de um smartphone deslizante e a resposta do fabricante ao Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 e ao Honor Magic 2. Ao contrário desses dois concorrentes, a Lenovo posicionou seu Z5 Pro no segmento de preço intermediário. Descubra em nossa análise se importar este telefone da Lenovo é uma boa idéia, apesar de um grande passo em falso.

Lenovo Z5 Pro (Z Smartphone Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 616
Memória
6144 MB 
Pantalha
6.39 polegadas 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, Tela multi-touch capacitiva, Super AMOLED, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 64GB ou 128GB, 107 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: USB Type C, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: sensor de proximidade, bússola eletrônica, giroscópio, acelerômetro, USB-C, OTG, Miracast, WiFi-Calling, VoLTE
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, TD-LTE: B34 / B38 / B39 / B40 / B41 (2555-2655MHz) FDD-LTE: B1 / B3 / B4 / B5 / B7 / B8 WCDMA: B1 / B2 / B5 / B8 TD-SCDMA: B34 / B39 GSM: B2 / B3 / B5 / B8, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.3 x 155.1 x 73
Bateria
3350 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix Dual: 16MP (f/1.8, 1/2.6", 1.22µm) + 24MP (1/2.8", 0.9µm), Camera2 API level: Legacy
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix Dual: 16MP (f/2.2) + 8MP, Camera2 API level: Legacy
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Um só alto-falante, Teclado: virtual, Fonte de alimentação modular CN, cabo USB, conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, ZUI 10, 24 Meses Garantia, LTE Cat.6 (300 Mbps/50 Mbps), DRM Widevine: L3), fanless
peso
210 g, Suprimento de energia: 71 g
Preço
300 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Lenovo Z5 Pro Smartphone
Lenovo Z5 Pro Smartphone
Lenovo Z5 Pro Smartphone
Lenovo Z5 Pro Smartphone

Size Comparison

159.8 mm 76.8 mm 7.5 mm 168 g157.8 mm 74.6 mm 8.8 mm 218 g157.3 mm 75.1 mm 8.3 mm 209 g155.1 mm 73 mm 9.3 mm 210 g155.5 mm 75.2 mm 8.8 mm 182 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
685 (min: 657, max: 705) MBit/s ∼100% +59%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
675 (min: 630, max: 704) MBit/s ∼99% +56%
Honor Magic 2
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
521 (min: 505, max: 536) MBit/s ∼76% +21%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
432 (min: 131, max: 492) MBit/s ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
279 (min: 265, max: 284) MBit/s ∼41% -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=381)
221 MBit/s ∼32% -49%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
663 (min: 507, max: 704) MBit/s ∼100% +51%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
647 (min: 598, max: 665) MBit/s ∼98% +48%
Honor Magic 2
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
632 (min: 590, max: 660) MBit/s ∼95% +44%
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
438 (min: 429, max: 451) MBit/s ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
320 (min: 164, max: 362) MBit/s ∼48% -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=381)
212 MBit/s ∼32% -52%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø437 (331-492)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø438 (429-451)
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Lenovo Z5 Pro
GPS Lenovo Z5 Pro
GPS Lenovo Z5 Pro
GPS Lenovo Z5 Pro
GPS Lenovo Z5 Pro
GPS Lenovo Z5 Pro
Lenovo Z5 Pro Software
Lenovo Z5 Pro Software
Lenovo Z5 Pro Software
Lenovo Z5 Pro Software

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Lenovo Z5 Pro
445
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
478
cd/m²
446
cd/m²
451
cd/m²
477
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
472
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 478 cd/m² Médio: 457 cd/m² Minimum: 2.87 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 451 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.07 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
145.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.236
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Honor Magic 2
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6
Screen
15%
45%
16%
44%
Brightness middle
451
489
8%
599
33%
594
32%
570
26%
Brightness
457
486
6%
593
30%
539
18%
565
24%
Brightness Distribution
93
93
0%
96
3%
85
-9%
93
0%
Black Level *
0.34
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.07
3.8
37%
1.4
77%
5.37
12%
1.5
75%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
11.34
7.1
37%
3.2
72%
8.32
27%
3.6
68%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.4
4.4
-0%
2
55%
3.7
16%
1.2
73%
Gamma
2.236 98%
2.22 99%
2.25 98%
2.127 103%
2.07 106%
CCT
7546 86%
7213 90%
6496 100%
7212 90%
6504 100%
Contrast
1438

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 122.5 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 122.5 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 122.5 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9590 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40.5 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
6775 Points ∼47%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14369 Points ∼100% +112%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
13374 Points ∼93% +97%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
6577 Points ∼46% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4026 Points ∼28% -41%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
6813 Points ∼47% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (6601 - 6813, n=4)
6714 Points ∼47% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=285)
4518 Points ∼31% -33%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
5754 Points ∼59%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9182 Points ∼94% +60%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8634 Points ∼89% +50%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9735 Points ∼100% +69%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4429 Points ∼45% -23%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5856 Points ∼60% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (5754 - 5917, n=4)
5843 Points ∼60% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=339)
4432 Points ∼46% -23%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1829 Points ∼55%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2468 Points ∼74% +35%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
2333 Points ∼70% +28%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3316 Points ∼100% +81%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1525 Points ∼46% -17%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1799 Points ∼54% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1799 - 1833, n=4)
1819 Points ∼55% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (437 - 4824, n=340)
1314 Points ∼40% -28%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
6806 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8101 Points ∼97% +19%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8326 Points ∼100% +22%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
7567 Points ∼91% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5387 Points ∼65% -21%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
6887 Points ∼83% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (6453 - 6887, n=4)
6691 Points ∼80% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 9974, n=334)
4867 Points ∼58% -28%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
8414 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9664 Points ∼96% +15%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
10052 Points ∼100% +19%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9728 Points ∼97% +16%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5625 Points ∼56% -33%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
8309 Points ∼83% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (7041 - 8414, n=4)
7846 Points ∼78% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4290 - 13531, n=502)
5304 Points ∼53% -37%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1932 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2257 Points ∼81% +17%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
2802 Points ∼100% +45%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
2371 Points ∼85% +23%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1845 Points ∼66% -5%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2534 Points ∼90% +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1840 - 2534, n=4)
2200 Points ∼79% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=349)
1792 Points ∼64% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1862 Points ∼42%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4468 Points ∼100% +140%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
4480 Points ∼100% +141%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4093 Points ∼91% +120%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
629 Points ∼14% -66%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1845 Points ∼41% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1845 - 1875, n=4)
1863 Points ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=349)
1529 Points ∼34% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1876 Points ∼49%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3669 Points ∼95% +96%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3846 Points ∼100% +105%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3524 Points ∼92% +88%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
737 Points ∼19% -61%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1964 Points ∼51% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1867 - 1981, n=4)
1922 Points ∼50% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=352)
1428 Points ∼37% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2184 Points ∼71%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2832 Points ∼93% +30%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3060 Points ∼100% +40%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
2421 Points ∼79% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1871 Points ∼61% -14%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2516 Points ∼82% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1862 - 2526, n=4)
2272 Points ∼74% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4493, n=364)
1768 Points ∼58% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2884 Points ∼35%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6898 Points ∼84% +139%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8245 Points ∼100% +186%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
2659 Points ∼32% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
954 Points ∼12% -67%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2855 Points ∼35% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2841 - 2887, n=4)
2867 Points ∼35% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=364)
2107 Points ∼26% -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2690 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5230 Points ∼86% +94%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
6054 Points ∼100% +125%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
2602 Points ∼43% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1071 Points ∼18% -60%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2772 Points ∼46% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2544 - 2798, n=4)
2701 Points ∼45% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 7980, n=365)
1794 Points ∼30% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2054 Points ∼56%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2528 Points ∼69% +23%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
2653 Points ∼73% +29%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3643 Points ∼100% +77%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1821 Points ∼50% -11%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2514 Points ∼69% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2054 - 2514, n=4)
2365 Points ∼65% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4262, n=425)
1724 Points ∼47% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1709 Points ∼36%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4746 Points ∼100% +178%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
4223 Points ∼89% +147%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3570 Points ∼75% +109%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
634 Points ∼13% -63%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1702 Points ∼36% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1702 - 1714, n=4)
1709 Points ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=427)
1263 Points ∼27% -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1774 Points ∼45%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3972 Points ∼100% +124%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3677 Points ∼93% +107%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3586 Points ∼90% +102%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
741 Points ∼19% -58%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1834 Points ∼46% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1774 - 1836, n=4)
1819 Points ∼46% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=435)
1210 Points ∼30% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1878 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2720 Points ∼72% +45%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3221 Points ∼86% +72%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3756 Points ∼100% +100%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1829 Points ∼49% -3%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2467 Points ∼66% +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1878 - 2495, n=4)
2310 Points ∼62% +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4240, n=458)
1631 Points ∼43% -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2767 Points ∼33%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8261 Points ∼100% +199%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8236 Points ∼100% +198%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
2755 Points ∼33% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
845 Points ∼10% -69%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2763 Points ∼33% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2725 - 2767, n=4)
2753 Points ∼33% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 9983, n=458)
1719 Points ∼21% -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2490 Points ∼41%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5687 Points ∼93% +128%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
6118 Points ∼100% +146%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
2928 Points ∼48% +18%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
960 Points ∼16% -61%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2691 Points ∼44% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2490 - 2694, n=4)
2630 Points ∼43% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7673, n=466)
1476 Points ∼24% -41%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
14570 Points ∼40%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
34928 Points ∼97% +140%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
35987 Points ∼100% +147%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
20851 Points ∼58% +43%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
13914 Points ∼39% -5%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14820 Points ∼41% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (13760 - 14820, n=4)
14443 Points ∼40% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8253 - 45072, n=618)
13405 Points ∼37% -8%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
39161 Points ∼47%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
82125 Points ∼98% +110%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
83976 Points ∼100% +114%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
42128 Points ∼50% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
15567 Points ∼19% -60%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
39655 Points ∼47% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (37157 - 39655, n=4)
38723 Points ∼46% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3585 - 162695, n=618)
19338 Points ∼23% -51%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
28454 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
63159 Points ∼98% +122%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
64627 Points ∼100% +127%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
34341 Points ∼53% +21%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
15167 Points ∼23% -47%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
28895 Points ∼45% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (26967 - 28895, n=4)
28185 Points ∼44% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4164 - 83518, n=619)
16165 Points ∼25% -43%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
65 fps ∼43%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
150 fps ∼99% +131%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
152 fps ∼100% +134%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
70 fps ∼46% +8%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
65 fps ∼43% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (65 - 65, n=4)
65 fps ∼43% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=644)
33.7 fps ∼22% -48%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
55 fps ∼92%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +9%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +9%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
55 fps ∼92% 0%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
57 fps ∼95% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (54 - 57, n=4)
55.5 fps ∼93% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=647)
26.3 fps ∼44% -52%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
32 fps ∼40%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
71 fps ∼88% +122%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
81 fps ∼100% +153%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
48 fps ∼59% +50%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
32 fps ∼40% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (32 - 33, n=4)
32.5 fps ∼40% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=563)
18.4 fps ∼23% -42%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
29 fps ∼50%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +100%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
56 fps ∼97% +93%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
58 fps ∼100% +100%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
31 fps ∼53% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (27 - 31, n=4)
29.5 fps ∼51% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=568)
17.1 fps ∼29% -41%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
23 fps ∼39%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼59% +52%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
59 fps ∼100% +157%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
53 fps ∼90% +130%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
23 fps ∼39% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (23 - 23, n=4)
23 fps ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=425)
15.3 fps ∼26% -33%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
20 fps ∼37%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
54 fps ∼100% +170%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
50 fps ∼93% +150%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
47 fps ∼87% +135%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
22 fps ∼41% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (19 - 22, n=4)
20.8 fps ∼39% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=428)
14.7 fps ∼27% -26%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
5.9 fps ∼27%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
22 fps ∼100% +273%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
20 fps ∼91% +239%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
8.2 fps ∼37% +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (5.9 - 8.4, n=4)
7.35 fps ∼33% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=129)
8.81 fps ∼40% +49%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
7.8 fps ∼25%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼45% +79%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
31 fps ∼100% +297%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5 fps ∼16% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (4.9 - 7.8, n=4)
5.73 fps ∼18% -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=129)
6.09 fps ∼20% -22%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
12 fps ∼39%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
31 fps ∼100% +158%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
20 fps ∼65% +67%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼42% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (11 - 13, n=4)
12.3 fps ∼40% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=130)
13.1 fps ∼42% +9%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
14 fps ∼44%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
32 fps ∼100% +129%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
30 fps ∼94% +114%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14 fps ∼44% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (13 - 14, n=4)
13.8 fps ∼43% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=129)
14.6 fps ∼46% +4%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
13 fps ∼37%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼100% +169%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
35 fps ∼100% +169%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
28 fps ∼80% +115%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼37% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (13 - 13, n=4)
13 fps ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=354)
10.3 fps ∼29% -21%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
13 fps ∼39%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
33 fps ∼100% +154%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
30 fps ∼91% +131%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
26 fps ∼79% +100%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
12 fps ∼36% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (11 - 13, n=4)
12 fps ∼36% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=358)
9.31 fps ∼28% -28%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
14.76 (min: 9.21, max: 22.89) fps ∼51%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
24.51 (min: 11.54, max: 48.55) fps ∼85% +66%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14.3 fps ∼50% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (14.3 - 15.5, n=3)
14.9 fps ∼52% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (13.8 - 651, n=53)
28.8 fps ∼100% +95%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
10.1 (min: 5.67, max: 14.56) fps ∼39%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
15.8 (min: 10.44, max: 44.6) fps ∼60% +56%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
12.1 fps ∼46% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (10.1 - 12.1, n=2)
11.1 fps ∼42% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0 - 606, n=47)
26.2 fps ∼100% +159%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
11.39 (min: 6.75, max: 29.89) fps ∼36%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
21.26 (min: 11.26, max: 61.24) fps ∼68% +87%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼41% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (11.4 - 13, n=3)
12.2 fps ∼39% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (12.5 - 739, n=48)
31.4 fps ∼100% +176%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
159128 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
263165 Points ∼90% +65%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
292798 Points ∼100% +84%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
268359 Points ∼92% +69%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
122826 Points ∼42% -23%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
169262 Points ∼58% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (155113 - 169262, n=4)
162553 Points ∼56% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0 - 374820, n=246)
125764 Points ∼43% -21%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
137693 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
227026 Points ∼90% +65%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
228173 Points ∼90% +66%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
253447 Points ∼100% +84%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
87728 Points ∼35% -36%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
135848 Points ∼54% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (135848 - 137693, n=3)
136892 Points ∼54% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23275 - 274007, n=449)
82754 Points ∼33% -40%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1708 Score ∼36%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4731 Score ∼100% +177%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1681 Score ∼36% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1681 - 1708, n=3)
1699 Score ∼36% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (927 - 5025, n=52)
2033 Score ∼43% +19%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1070 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1296 Points ∼94% +21%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
1386 Points ∼100% +30%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
1257 Points ∼91% +17%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1090 Points ∼79% +2%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1077 Points ∼78% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1070 - 1135, n=4)
1095 Points ∼79% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=576)
726 Points ∼52% -32%
Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
3102 Points ∼39%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7945 Points ∼100% +156%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
7891 Points ∼99% +154%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4963 Points ∼62% +60%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1356 Points ∼17% -56%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
3086 Points ∼39% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2906 - 3102, n=4)
3037 Points ∼38% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=576)
1864 Points ∼23% -40%
Memory (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
3009 Points ∼55%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3239 Points ∼60% +8%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3791 Points ∼70% +26%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5431 Points ∼100% +80%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2445 Points ∼45% -19%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2947 Points ∼54% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2947 - 3575, n=4)
3148 Points ∼58% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 6283, n=576)
1386 Points ∼26% -54%
System (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
5603 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6506 Points ∼80% +16%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8146 Points ∼100% +45%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
7789 Points ∼96% +39%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4506 Points ∼55% -20%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5681 Points ∼70% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (5603 - 5782, n=4)
5675 Points ∼70% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=576)
2758 Points ∼34% -51%
Overall (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2735 Points ∼64%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3838 Points ∼90% +40%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
4287 Points ∼100% +57%
Honor Magic 2
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4014 Points ∼94% +47%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2009 Points ∼47% -27%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2731 Points ∼64% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2731 - 2855, n=4)
2774 Points ∼65% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=580)
1367 Points ∼32% -50%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Z5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
488 Points ∼66%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
482 Points ∼65% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (479 - 488, n=3)
483 Points ∼65% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (36.3 - 2754, n=91)
741 Points ∼100% +52%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Honor Magic 2 (Huawei Browser 9.0.1.331)
102 Points ∼100% +55%
Average of class Smartphone (17.6 - 23832, n=483)
87.1 Points ∼85% +32%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)
85.976 Points ∼84% +30%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
75.959 Points ∼74% +15%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
66.048 Points ∼65% 0%
Lenovo Z5 Pro (Chrome 72)
65.987 Points ∼65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (50.5 - 66, n=4)
62 Points ∼61% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
47.986 Points ∼47% -27%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Honor Magic 2 (Huawei Browser 9.0.1.331)
20975 Points ∼100% +72%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)
16489 Points ∼79% +35%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
14514 Points ∼69% +19%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
12717 Points ∼61% +4%
Lenovo Z5 Pro (Chrome 72)
12209 Points ∼58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (10885 - 12802, n=4)
12153 Points ∼58% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
9165 Points ∼44% -25%
Average of class Smartphone (3126 - 43280, n=637)
6025 Points ∼29% -51%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=656)
10986 ms * ∼100% -246%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
4122.8 ms * ∼38% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (3035 - 3800, n=4)
3267 ms * ∼30% -3%
Lenovo Z5 Pro (Chrome 72)
3176.5 ms * ∼29%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
3034.9 ms * ∼28% +4%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
2713.6 ms * ∼25% +15%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)
2299.9 ms * ∼21% +28%
Honor Magic 2 (Huawei Browser 9.0.1.331)
1984 ms * ∼18% +38%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Honor Magic 2
97 Points ∼100% +37%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)
95 Points ∼98% +34%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
72 Points ∼74% +1%
Lenovo Z5 Pro (Chrome 72)
71 Points ∼73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (58 - 72, n=4)
67.8 Points ∼70% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 161, n=110)
63.3 Points ∼65% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
57 Points ∼59% -20%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)
260 Points ∼100% +31%
Honor Magic 2 (Huawei Browser 9.0.1.331)
228 Points ∼88% +15%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
223 Points ∼86% +13%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
209 Points ∼80% +6%
Lenovo Z5 Pro (Chrome 72)
198 Points ∼76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (170 - 209, n=4)
192 Points ∼74% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
168 Points ∼65% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (106 - 362, n=322)
119 Points ∼46% -40%

* ... smaller is better

Lenovo Z5 ProXiaomi Pocophone F1Xiaomi Mi Mix 3Honor Magic 2Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Average 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
45%
62%
474%
-7%
9%
-20%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
65.58 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
64.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
65.5 (58.8 - 73.5, n=11)
47.9 (9.5 - 87.1, n=382)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
85.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
78.15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
77.7 (72.3 - 85.9, n=11)
66 (8.1 - 96.5, n=382)
Random Write 4KB
14.76
17.81
21%
19.54
32%
250
1594%
15.45
5%
25 (8.48 - 87.3, n=12)
69%
18.9 (0.14 - 250, n=686)
28%
Random Read 4KB
77.44
101.01
30%
133.24
72%
143
85%
83.98
8%
65.9 (20.7 - 86.2, n=12)
-15%
43.1 (1.59 - 174, n=686)
-44%
Sequential Write 256KB
190.76
155.57
-18%
206.76
8%
185
-3%
104.87
-45%
168 (90 - 191, n=12)
-12%
89.1 (2.99 - 388, n=686)
-53%
Sequential Read 256KB
284.55
705.38
148%
674.98
137%
908
219%
295.76
4%
266 (144 - 293, n=12)
-7%
251 (12.1 - 1468, n=686)
-12%

Asphalt 9 Legends

010203040Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø22.4 (11-31)
; Standard / low: Ø25.8 (12-31)

PUBG Mobile

01020304050Tooltip
; Smooth: Ø38.1 (26-42)
; HD: Ø27.2 (14-31)

Dead Trigger 2

010203040Tooltip
: Ø30 (28-31)
Carga Máxima
 37.4 °C35.6 °C33.9 °C 
 37.5 °C35.7 °C34.3 °C 
 36.7 °C34.9 °C34.3 °C 
Máximo: 37.5 °C
Médio: 35.6 °C
33.4 °C36.9 °C44 °C
33.2 °C36.7 °C42.4 °C
34 °C36.6 °C38.5 °C
Máximo: 44 °C
Médio: 37.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  40.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.4302530.430.7312728.84033.132.95034.633.66329.129.4802424.410023.62412521.233.416021.142.420018.846.625018.751.631517.654.340016.654.250015.855.263015.85880015.363.3100016.366.4125014.767.31600166620001564.2250014.763.9315014.760.7400014.362.7500014.868.7630015.166800015.262.51000014.458.51250014.4641600014.457.2SPL5527.576.6N9.30.937.9median 15.3median 60.7Delta1.36.935.739.626.725.828.722.426.52936.936.426.725.426.921.922.323.820.223.917.741.218.741.919.248.815.85515.660.613.964.314.365.614.866.513.466.914.370.114.571.913.873.613.674.914.174.914.17414.976.71572.915.269.814.973.414.766.114.75326.784.80.859.7median 14.8median 66.51.711.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Z5 ProXiaomi Mi Mix 3
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Z5 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.8 / 1.4 / 1.9 Watt
Carga midlight 3.7 / 5.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Z5 Pro
3350 mAh
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
3200 mAh
Honor Magic 2
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-24%
14%
-9%
-11%
-5%
-13%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
0.65
19%
0.49
39%
0.6
25%
0.71
11%
0.787 (0.76 - 0.8, n=3)
2%
0.883 (0.2 - 3.4, n=714)
-10%
Idle Average *
1.4
1.97
-41%
0.67
52%
0.9
36%
1.36
3%
1.657 (1.4 - 2.07, n=3)
-18%
1.735 (0.6 - 6.2, n=713)
-24%
Idle Maximum *
1.9
2.01
-6%
0.87
54%
1.9
-0%
1.47
23%
2 (1.8 - 2.31, n=3)
-5%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=714)
-6%
Load Average *
3.7
4.29
-16%
3.64
2%
6.3
-70%
5.13
-39%
3.62 (3.2 - 3.97, n=3)
2%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=708)
-10%
Load Maximum *
5.1
9.05
-77%
9.04
-77%
7.05
-38%
7.89
-55%
5.44 (5.1 - 5.82, n=3)
-7%
5.85 (1.2 - 14.2, n=708)
-15%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 45min
Lenovo Z5 Pro
3350 mAh
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
3200 mAh
Honor Magic 2
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
705
808
15%
719
2%
773
10%
605
-14%

Pro

+ Acabamento
+ Design
+ Tela OLED
+ Wi-Fi rápido
+ NFC + BT 5.0
+ Snapdragon 710 impressionante...

Contra

- ... que, tem problemas com jogos exigentes
- Ainda rodando Android 8.1
- Sem armazenamento UFS
- Módulo GPS
- Alto-falante um pouco fraco
- (importação / restrições)
Review: Lenovo Z5 Pro. Test unit provided by Trading Shenzhen
Review: Lenovo Z5 Pro. Test unit provided by Trading Shenzhen

O Lenovo Z5 Pro é um smartphone muito interessante que está disponível por cerca de $ 300. O mecanismo deslizante permite que o dispositivo de gama média exiba uma aparência que, até agora, tem sido limitada principalmente à elite dos smartphones: Uma tela grande quase totalmente sem marcos. O acabamento e o material dão ao celular da Lenovo um exterior de alta qualidade.

Ao contrário de sua competição de “deslizantes” da Xiaomi e Honor, o Lenovo Z5 Pro é equipado com um Snapdragon 710. Este chip é rápido o suficiente e os usuários dificilmente notariam uma diferença entre esses dispositivos no uso diário. Somente jogos graficamente exigentes podem ter que ser evitados no Z5 Pro. O tipo de armazenamento moderno ausente pode ser mais um problema, pois isso tem um impacto negativo perceptível no tempo que os aplicativos precisam carregar. Isso significa que há diferenças perceptíveis na velocidade em comparação com o Mi Mix 3.

O Z5 Pro introduz o mecanismo deslizante para smartphones de gama média. No entanto, o fabricante chinês deve se esforçar um pouco mais em otimizar o software do seu telefone deslizante.

Atualmente, o Z5 Pro não está diretamente disponível nos EUA. Isso significa que o telefone teria que ser importado, o que implica certas restrições, como o suporte a LTE ausente e riscos.

Lenovo Z5 Pro - 02/26/2019 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento
85%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
93%
Conectividade
45 / 60 → 74%
Peso
88%
Bateria
95%
Pantalha
83%
Desempenho do jogos
57 / 63 → 90%
Desempenho da aplicação
64 / 70 → 92%
Temperatura
91%
Ruído
100%
Audio
59 / 91 → 65%
Camera
73%
Médio
77%
85%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Lenovo Z5 Pro
Marcus Herbrich, 2019-02-28 (Update: 2019-02-28)