Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 8.1

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 02/12/2019

Room for improvement. A HMD Global está posicionando o Nokia 8.1 como um dispositivo de gama média-alta. No entanto, a empresa tem cotado o 8.1 a €400 (~$456), o que coloca na mira dos carros-chefes do ano. Leia mais para ver o que o Nokia 8.1 oferece para enfrentar a forte concorrência.

Nokia 8.1 (8 Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 616
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
6.18 polegadas 18,7:9, 2246 x 1080 pixel 408 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 51 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSd de até 400 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Bússola, Giroscópio, Sensor de Proximidade, USB Type-C
Funcionamento em rede
Qualcomm Wi-Fi B/G/N/AC (2x2) (b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM: 850, 900, 1800, 1,900 MHz. UMTS: 850, 900, 1,900, 2,100 MHz. LTE: Bands 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20., Dual SIM, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8 x 154.8 x 75.8
Bateria
13.3 Wh, 3500 mAh Lítio-Ion, Carregador rápido de 18 W
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix , f/1.8, Dual-pixel Phase-detection autofocus (PDAF), OIS, dual-LED flash, Videos at up to 2160p/30 FPS (main camera). 13.0 MP, f/2.4, Depth of Field (Secondary Camera)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix , f/2.0
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono no lado inferior do dispositivo, Teclado: Virtual, Carregador rápido, cabo USB Type-C, fones, ferramenta SIM, Android One, Nokia Mobile Care, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR values: Body – 1.490 W/kg, Head - 0.514 W/kg; FM radio; LTE Cat. 6 – up to 300 MBit/s download and 50 MBit/s upload speeds; VoLTE, VoWiFi., fanless
peso
180 g, Suprimento de energia: 72 g
Preço
400 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Nokia 8.1
Nokia 8.1
Nokia 8.1
Nokia 8.1
Nokia 8.1
Nokia 8.1
Nokia 8.1
Nokia 8.1
Nokia 8.1

Size Comparison

162.5 mm 77 mm 7.8 mm 183 g153 mm 72 mm 11.1 mm 198 g154.8 mm 75.8 mm 8 mm 180 g150.9 mm 74.9 mm 8.1 mm 189 g140.9 mm 72.97 mm 7.5 mm 176 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XZ2
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
669 MBit/s ∼100% +114%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
654 MBit/s ∼98% +110%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
584 (min: 557, max: 605) MBit/s ∼87% +87%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
312 (min: 273, max: 341) MBit/s ∼47%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
278 MBit/s ∼42% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=409)
222 MBit/s ∼33% -29%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
668 MBit/s ∼100% +123%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
633 MBit/s ∼95% +111%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
550 MBit/s ∼82% +83%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
300 (min: 169, max: 367) MBit/s ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
285 (min: 249, max: 304) MBit/s ∼43% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=409)
212 MBit/s ∼32% -29%
GPS test: Nokia 8.1 - Overview
GPS test: Nokia 8.1 - Overview
GPS test: Nokia 8.1 - Loop
GPS test: Nokia 8.1 - Loop
GPS test: Nokia 8.1 - Bridge
GPS test: Nokia 8.1 - Bridge
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Photo taken with the rear-facing camera
Photo taken with the rear-facing camera
Photo taken with the rear-facing camera with Live-Bokeh activated
Photo taken with the rear-facing camera with Live-Bokeh activated
Photo taken with the rear-facing camera with a narrower viewing angle
Photo taken with the rear-facing camera with a narrower viewing angle
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
Our test chart in detail
Our test chart in detail
ColorChecker Passport: The lower half of each area of colour displays the reference colour
ColorChecker Passport: The lower half of each area of colour displays the reference colour
523
cd/m²
543
cd/m²
541
cd/m²
566
cd/m²
567
cd/m²
536
cd/m²
553
cd/m²
546
cd/m²
550
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 567 cd/m² Médio: 547.2 cd/m² Minimum: 4.88 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 567 cd/m²
Contraste: 930:1 (Preto: 0.61 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.39 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.248
Nokia 8.1
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
OLED, 2220x1080, 6.3
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99
Sony Xperia XZ2
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7
Nokia 8 Sirocco
P-OLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Screen
25%
4%
35%
-5%
Brightness middle
567
553
-2%
492
-13%
630
11%
576
2%
Brightness
547
553
1%
463
-15%
632
16%
597
9%
Brightness Distribution
92
96
4%
90
-2%
96
4%
85
-8%
Black Level *
0.61
0.59
3%
0.44
28%
Contrast
930
834
-10%
1432
54%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.39
2.2
50%
2.4
45%
1.5
66%
5
-14%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.28
5.1
30%
6.2
15%
4.3
41%
8
-10%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.9
1.7
65%
4.5
8%
2.1
57%
5.4
-10%
Gamma
2.248 98%
2.06 107%
2.25 98%
2.17 101%
2.3 96%
CCT
7642 85%
6434 101%
6395 102%
6513 100%
7730 84%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 75.76 Hz ≤ 10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 75.76 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 75.76 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9447 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40.1 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
6813 Points ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5542 Points ∼39% -19%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
14362 Points ∼100% +111%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
7865 Points ∼55% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (6601 - 6813, n=4)
6714 Points ∼47% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=309)
4566 Points ∼32% -33%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5856 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5826 Points ∼65% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8937 Points ∼100% +53%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
8510 Points ∼95% +45%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
6701 Points ∼75% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (5754 - 5917, n=4)
5843 Points ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=364)
4554 Points ∼51% -22%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1799 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1601 Points ∼65% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2456 Points ∼100% +37%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
2464 Points ∼100% +37%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
1952 Points ∼79% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1799 - 1833, n=4)
1819 Points ∼74% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (691 - 4824, n=366)
1356 Points ∼55% -25%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
6887 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5789 Points ∼72% -16%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8078 Points ∼100% +17%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
8069 Points ∼100% +17%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
7193 Points ∼89% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (6453 - 6887, n=4)
6691 Points ∼83% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=359)
5004 Points ∼62% -27%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
8309 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
6338 Points ∼68% -24%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9179 Points ∼98% +10%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
9319 Points ∼100% +12%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
7925 Points ∼85% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (7041 - 8414, n=4)
7846 Points ∼84% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=527)
5476 Points ∼59% -34%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2534 Points ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2774 Points ∼78% +9%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2246 Points ∼64% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3537 Points ∼100% +40%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
2382 Points ∼67% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1840 - 2534, n=4)
2200 Points ∼62% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=374)
1832 Points ∼52% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1845 Points ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1268 Points ∼22% -31%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4621 Points ∼81% +150%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5690 Points ∼100% +208%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
4187 Points ∼74% +127%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1845 - 1875, n=4)
1863 Points ∼33% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=374)
1597 Points ∼28% -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1964 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1433 Points ∼29% -27%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3742 Points ∼75% +91%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5012 Points ∼100% +155%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
3584 Points ∼72% +82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1867 - 1981, n=4)
1922 Points ∼38% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=377)
1484 Points ∼30% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2516 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2645 Points ∼75% +5%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2270 Points ∼64% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3540 Points ∼100% +41%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
2119 Points ∼60% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1862 - 2526, n=4)
2272 Points ∼64% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=388)
1807 Points ∼51% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2855 Points ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1757 Points ∼21% -38%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5228 Points ∼64% +83%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
8233 Points ∼100% +188%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
4514 Points ∼55% +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2841 - 2887, n=4)
2867 Points ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=388)
2194 Points ∼27% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2772 Points ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1898 Points ∼30% -32%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4054 Points ∼64% +46%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
6359 Points ∼100% +129%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
3608 Points ∼57% +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2544 - 2798, n=4)
2701 Points ∼42% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=389)
1861 Points ∼29% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2514 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2073 Points ∼57% -18%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2606 Points ∼72% +4%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3630 Points ∼100% +44%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
2946 Points ∼81% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2054 - 2514, n=4)
2365 Points ∼65% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=450)
1762 Points ∼49% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1702 Points ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1185 Points ∼23% -30%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5181 Points ∼100% +204%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5122 Points ∼99% +201%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
3926 Points ∼76% +131%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1702 - 1714, n=4)
1709 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=452)
1324 Points ∼26% -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1834 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1354 Points ∼29% -26%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4248 Points ∼91% +132%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
4693 Points ∼100% +156%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
3656 Points ∼78% +99%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1774 - 1836, n=4)
1819 Points ∼39% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=460)
1262 Points ∼27% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2467 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2741 Points ∼75% +11%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2159 Points ∼59% -12%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3642 Points ∼100% +48%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
2287 Points ∼63% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1878 - 2495, n=4)
2310 Points ∼63% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=482)
1669 Points ∼46% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2763 Points ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1918 Points ∼24% -31%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6630 Points ∼82% +140%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
8122 Points ∼100% +194%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
4511 Points ∼56% +63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2725 - 2767, n=4)
2753 Points ∼34% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=482)
1802 Points ∼22% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2691 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2054 Points ∼32% -24%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4540 Points ∼71% +69%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
6378 Points ∼100% +137%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
3709 Points ∼58% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2490 - 2694, n=4)
2630 Points ∼41% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=490)
1543 Points ∼24% -43%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14820 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
18523 Points ∼52% +25%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
30245 Points ∼84% +104%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
35856 Points ∼100% +142%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
21407 Points ∼60% +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (13760 - 14820, n=4)
14443 Points ∼40% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=642)
13649 Points ∼38% -8%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
39655 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
29065 Points ∼36% -27%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
76078 Points ∼95% +92%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
80233 Points ∼100% +102%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
58018 Points ∼72% +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (37157 - 39655, n=4)
38723 Points ∼48% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11358 - 162695, n=642)
20023 Points ∼25% -50%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
28895 Points ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
25783 Points ∼41% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
56913 Points ∼90% +97%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
62926 Points ∼100% +118%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
42040 Points ∼67% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (26967 - 28895, n=4)
28185 Points ∼45% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11565 - 83518, n=643)
16599 Points ∼26% -43%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
65 fps ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
46 fps ∼31% -29%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
150 fps ∼100% +131%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
150 fps ∼100% +131%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
106 fps ∼71% +63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (65 - 65, n=4)
65 fps ∼43% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=670)
35 fps ∼23% -46%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
57 fps ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
50 fps ∼83% -12%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +5%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +5%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (54 - 57, n=4)
55.5 fps ∼93% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=673)
26.9 fps ∼45% -53%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
32 fps ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
23 fps ∼28% -28%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
74 fps ∼90% +131%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
82 fps ∼100% +156%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
54 fps ∼66% +69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (32 - 33, n=4)
32.5 fps ∼40% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=589)
19.3 fps ∼24% -40%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
31 fps ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
21 fps ∼36% -32%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼100% +90%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
59 fps ∼100% +90%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
37 fps ∼63% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (27 - 31, n=4)
29.5 fps ∼50% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=594)
17.8 fps ∼30% -43%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
23 fps ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
15 fps ∼25% -35%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +161%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +161%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
41 fps ∼68% +78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (23 - 23, n=4)
23 fps ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=450)
15.9 fps ∼27% -31%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
22 fps ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
14 fps ∼25% -36%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
55 fps ∼100% +150%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
55 fps ∼100% +150%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
24 fps ∼44% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (19 - 22, n=4)
20.8 fps ∼38% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=453)
15.1 fps ∼27% -31%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
8.2 fps ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
3 fps ∼34% -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (5.9 - 8.4, n=4)
7.35 fps ∼82% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=153)
8.93 fps ∼100% +9%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5 fps ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
4.8 fps ∼78% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (4.9 - 7.8, n=4)
5.73 fps ∼93% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=153)
6.17 fps ∼100% +23%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
7.5 fps ∼56% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (11 - 13, n=4)
12.3 fps ∼92% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=155)
13.4 fps ∼100% +3%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14 fps ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8.6 fps ∼58% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (13 - 14, n=4)
13.8 fps ∼93% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=154)
14.8 fps ∼100% +6%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
9.1 fps ∼26% -30%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼100% +169%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
35 fps ∼100% +169%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
26 fps ∼74% +100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (13 - 13, n=4)
13 fps ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=379)
10.7 fps ∼31% -18%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
12 fps ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8.3 fps ∼24% -31%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
34 fps ∼100% +183%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
33 fps ∼97% +175%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
15 fps ∼44% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (11 - 13, n=4)
12 fps ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=383)
9.64 fps ∼28% -20%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14.3 fps ∼95%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (14.3 - 15.5, n=3)
14.9 fps ∼99% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.53 - 37.4, n=61)
15.1 fps ∼100% +6%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
12.1 fps ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (10.1 - 12.1, n=2)
11.1 fps ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.91 - 36.2, n=56)
12.1 fps ∼100% 0%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼91%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (11.4 - 13, n=3)
12.2 fps ∼85% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.2 - 38.6, n=56)
14.3 fps ∼100% +10%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
169262 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
140878 Points ∼53% -17%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
266601 Points ∼100% +58%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
266981 Points ∼100% +58%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
209729 Points ∼79% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (155113 - 169262, n=4)
162553 Points ∼61% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=272)
130479 Points ∼49% -23%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
135848 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
116969 Points ∼52% -14%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
162183 Points ∼72% +19%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
225663 Points ∼100% +66%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
185487 Points ∼82% +37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (135848 - 137693, n=3)
136892 Points ∼61% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23275 - 283270, n=476)
85674 Points ∼38% -37%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1681 Score ∼88%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1681 - 1708, n=3)
1699 Score ∼89% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (552 - 5025, n=58)
1911 Score ∼100% +14%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1077 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1105 Points ∼82% +3%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1234 Points ∼92% +15%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
1346 Points ∼100% +25%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
1202 Points ∼89% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1070 - 1135, n=4)
1095 Points ∼81% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=602)
742 Points ∼55% -31%
Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
3086 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2332 Points ∼29% -24%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7918 Points ∼100% +157%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
7868 Points ∼99% +155%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
6084 Points ∼77% +97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2906 - 3102, n=4)
3037 Points ∼38% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=602)
1943 Points ∼25% -37%
Memory (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2947 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2393 Points ∼76% -19%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3012 Points ∼95% +2%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
2193 Points ∼69% -26%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
3162 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2947 - 3575, n=4)
3148 Points ∼100% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=602)
1449 Points ∼46% -51%
System (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5681 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5063 Points ∼60% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5792 Points ∼69% +2%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
8402 Points ∼100% +48%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
5888 Points ∼70% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (5603 - 5782, n=4)
5675 Points ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=602)
2857 Points ∼34% -50%
Overall (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2731 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2364 Points ∼63% -13%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3614 Points ∼97% +32%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3738 Points ∼100% +37%
Nokia 8 Sirocco
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 6144
3416 Points ∼91% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2731 - 2855, n=4)
2774 Points ∼74% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=606)
1420 Points ∼38% -48%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
482 Points ∼68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (479 - 488, n=3)
483 Points ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (35 - 2754, n=102)
709 Points ∼100% +47%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
89.54 Points ∼100% +36%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
69.765 Points ∼78% +6%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
66.048 Points ∼74%
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66)
62.157 Points ∼69% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (50.5 - 66, n=4)
62 Points ∼69% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)
51.786 Points ∼58% -22%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 273, n=505)
38.8 Points ∼43% -41%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
16774 Points ∼100% +32%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
14491 Points ∼86% +14%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
12717 Points ∼76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (10885 - 12802, n=4)
12153 Points ∼72% -4%
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66)
11544 Points ∼69% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)
10145 Points ∼60% -20%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=663)
6281 Points ∼37% -51%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=683)
10792 ms * ∼100% -256%
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66)
4812.6 ms * ∼45% -59%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)
3841.8 (min: 1) ms * ∼36% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (3035 - 3800, n=4)
3267 ms * ∼30% -8%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
3034.9 ms * ∼28%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
2868 ms * ∼27% +5%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
2394.3 ms * ∼22% +21%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
98 Points ∼100% +36%
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66)
77 Points ∼79% +7%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
72 Points ∼73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (58 - 72, n=4)
67.8 Points ∼69% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=134)
63.4 Points ∼65% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)
59 Points ∼60% -18%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Points ∼0% -100%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
262 Points ∼100% +25%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
228 Points ∼87% +9%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
209 Points ∼80%
Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66)
204 Points ∼78% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (170 - 209, n=4)
192 Points ∼73% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)
167 Points ∼64% -20%
Average of class Smartphone (66 - 362, n=329)
119 Points ∼45% -43%

* ... smaller is better

Nokia 8.1Samsung Galaxy A9 2018Xiaomi Mi Mix 2SSony Xperia XZ2Nokia 8 SiroccoAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
46%
481%
47%
119%
29%
7%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
58.27 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
59.66 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
30.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-48%
56.3 (58.4 - 74.7, n=100)
-3%
48.6 (9.5 - 87.1, n=403)
-17%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73.66 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-13%
34.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-60%
74.3 (76.1 - 87.2, n=100)
-12%
66.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=403)
-21%
Random Write 4KB
7.3
19.79
171%
128.36
1658%
17
133%
22.4
207%
24.2 (3.4 - 88.2, n=110)
232%
20.1 (0.14 - 250, n=712)
175%
Random Read 4KB
69.9
116.76
67%
135.14
93%
149.4
114%
140.7
101%
54.4 (11.4 - 149, n=110)
-22%
44.8 (1.59 - 175, n=712)
-36%
Sequential Write 256KB
203.8
194.65
-4%
208.1
2%
198.7
-3%
211.6
4%
172 (40 - 246, n=110)
-16%
92.2 (2.99 - 503, n=712)
-55%
Sequential Read 256KB
279.3
426.63
53%
756.07
171%
679.2
143%
737.5
164%
272 (95.6 - 704, n=110)
-3%
259 (12.1 - 1468, n=712)
-7%
Asphalt 9: Legends
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 High Quality29 fps
 Standard / low29 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Arena of Valor
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 min60 fps
 high HD60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Shadow Fight 3
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high60 fps
 minimal60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
PUBG Compare
010203040506070Tooltip
Nokia 8.1 Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Arena of Valor; min; 1.27.1.2: Ø59.9 (57-60)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Arena of Valor; min: Ø60 (58-61)
Nokia 8 Sirocco Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Arena of Valor; min; 1.21.1.2: Ø59.7 (53-60)
Nokia 8.1 Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.27.1.2: Ø59.6 (47-60)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Arena of Valor; high HD: Ø60 (56-61)
Nokia 8 Sirocco Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.21.1.2: Ø59.8 (54-60)
Nokia 8.1 Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.3.1a: Ø28.9 (25-31)
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Adreno 512, 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality: Ø27.7 (24-30)
Nokia 8.1 Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.3.1a: Ø29.3 (28-31)
Nokia 8.1 Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Shadow Fight 3; high; 1.16.1: Ø59.1 (53-60)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Shadow Fight 3; high: Ø59.1 (53-61)
Nokia 8 Sirocco Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Shadow Fight 3; high; 1.9.4: Ø59.5 (54-60)
Nokia 8.1 Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Shadow Fight 3; minimal; 1.16.1: Ø59.5 (57-60)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Shadow Fight 3; minimal: Ø59.3 (53-61)
Nokia 8 Sirocco Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Shadow Fight 3; minimal; 1.9.4: Ø59.5 (54-60)
Carga Máxima
 46.1 °C41.4 °C42.6 °C 
 44.6 °C41.2 °C42.8 °C 
 43.2 °C40.8 °C41.2 °C 
Máximo: 46.1 °C
Médio: 42.7 °C
38.6 °C39.6 °C44.1 °C
38.6 °C39.7 °C43.8 °C
38.5 °C40.3 °C42.1 °C
Máximo: 44.1 °C
Médio: 40.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  44.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.1 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.1372539.138.23130.331.84034.2315031.431.76327.526.98021.822.610022.82612524.332.616020.539.320019.345.125018.750.831517.353.640016.758.350016.56263016.665.680015.666.7100015.172.4125014.171.4160014.163.7200014.462250013.959.8315013.866400013.662.8500014.670.863001470.9800014.270.31000013.762.61250013.758.41600013.948.9SPL69.763.426.979.8N22.916.80.946.1median 14.6median 62Delta2832.83924.328.518.619.924.330.133.835.221.223.424.82318.525.216.436.617.144.517.941.816.850.714.953.915.158.714.262.913.966.514.86814.269.414.771.214.473.414.372.31475.313.880.214.88114.475.61573.714.773.614.870.514.860.814.75526.787.50.865.9median 14.8median 680.610.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNokia 8.1Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nokia 8.1 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.05 / 0.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.8 / 1.5 / 1.8 Watt
Carga midlight 3.2 / 5.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Nokia 8.1
3500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
3800 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
3400 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2
3180 mAh
Nokia 8 Sirocco
3260 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-24%
-40%
-35%
-5%
-7%
-15%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
1.06
-33%
0.75
6%
0.72
10%
0.78
2%
0.787 (0.76 - 0.8, n=3)
2%
0.88 (0.2 - 3.4, n=743)
-10%
Idle Average *
1.5
1.94
-29%
2.25
-50%
2.21
-47%
1.53
-2%
1.657 (1.4 - 2.07, n=3)
-10%
1.733 (0.6 - 6.2, n=742)
-16%
Idle Maximum *
1.8
1.98
-10%
2.26
-26%
2.22
-23%
1.57
13%
2 (1.8 - 2.31, n=3)
-11%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=743)
-12%
Load Average *
3.2
3.56
-11%
4.89
-53%
4.6
-44%
3.49
-9%
3.62 (3.2 - 3.97, n=3)
-13%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=737)
-27%
Load Maximum *
5.4
7.49
-39%
9.6
-78%
9.34
-73%
6.96
-29%
5.44 (5.1 - 5.82, n=3)
-1%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=737)
-9%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
28h 02min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 18min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 17min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 06min
Nokia 8.1
3500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018
3800 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
3400 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2
3180 mAh
Nokia 8 Sirocco
3260 mAh
Battery Runtime
-0%
-6%
-19%
1%
Reader / Idle
1682
1780
6%
1678
0%
1402
-17%
1603
-5%
H.264
857
1005
17%
718
-16%
722
-16%
725
-15%
WiFi v1.3
738
689
-7%
716
-3%
679
-8%
693
-6%
Load
246
205
-17%
239
-3%
159
-35%
317
29%

Pro

+ Carcaça premium
+ Bom desempenho
+ Boas câmeras
+ Baixo consumo de energia
+ Duração da bateria sólida
+ Sem afogamentos sob uso intenso
+ Tela brilhante

Contra

- Suporte para apenas algumas bandas LTE
- Armazenamento interno baixo e lento
- Alto valor de preto da tela
The Nokia 8.1 smartphone review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.
The Nokia 8.1 smartphone review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.

A faixa de $450 para smartphones é um mercado difícil, que se tornou ainda mais competitivo com os carros-chefes do ano passado cujo preço agora está abaixando. No papel, parecia que o Nokia 8.1 poderia ter dificuldades contra de aparelhos como o Sony Xperia XZ2, mas a HMD Global fez um ótimo trabalho na criação de um smartphone muito completo que tem muito a oferecer.

O dispositivo tem um design elegante e premium, que até ameaça aos smartphones mais caros uma corrida pelo seu dinheiro. Além disso, seu SoC moderno pode competir com chips mais antigos e tem uma excelente duração de bateria. Sua tela é tão brilhante quanto as encontradas nos carros-chefe do ano passado, e será capturada sob a luz direta do sol. Além disso, suas câmeras nos impressionaram durante nossos testes, mesmo que não tenham alguns dos truques que muitos smartphones emblemáticos têm.

O Nokia 8.1 faz o básico bem e dispensa frivolidades para confundir as linhas entre os smartphones de gama média e topo de gama.

No entanto, o Nokia 8.1 tem suas desvantagens. A HMD Global equipou-o com armazenamento flash eMMC lento, e há menos bandas LTE do que gostaríamos de ver. Além disso, sua tela possui um valor de preto comparativamente alto e uma taxa de contraste fraca. No entanto, se você é um purista do Android e deseja uma experiência próxima à de um carro-chefe a um preço acessível, o Nokia 8.1 deve estar na lista de desejos do seu próximo smartphone.

Nokia 8.1 - 02/06/2019 v6
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
87%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
97%
Conectividade
42 / 60 → 70%
Peso
90%
Bateria
95%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
57 / 63 → 91%
Desempenho da aplicação
64 / 70 → 91%
Temperatura
86%
Ruído
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 62%
Camera
73%
Médio
77%
87%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 8.1
Florian Schmitt, 2019-02-12 (Update: 2019-02-12)