Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 8.1
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Nokia 8 Sirocco | |
| Nokia 8.1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S | |
| Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Nokia 8.1 | |
| Nokia 8 Sirocco | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 567 cd/m²
Contraste: 930:1 (Preto: 0.61 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.39 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.248
| Nokia 8.1 IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18 | Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 OLED, 2220x1080, 6.30 | Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99 | Sony Xperia XZ2 IPS, 2160x1080, 5.70 | Nokia 8 Sirocco P-OLED, 2560x1440, 5.50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 25% | 4% | 35% | -5% | |
| Brightness middle | 567 | 553 -2% | 492 -13% | 630 11% | 576 2% |
| Brightness | 547 | 553 1% | 463 -15% | 632 16% | 597 9% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 96 4% | 90 -2% | 96 4% | 85 -8% |
| Black Level * | 0.61 | 0.59 3% | 0.44 28% | ||
| Contrast | 930 | 834 -10% | 1432 54% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.39 | 2.2 50% | 2.4 45% | 1.5 66% | 5 -14% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.28 | 5.1 30% | 6.2 15% | 4.3 41% | 8 -10% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.9 | 1.7 65% | 4.5 8% | 2.1 57% | 5.4 -10% |
| Gamma | 2.248 98% | 2.06 107% | 2.25 98% | 2.17 101% | 2.3 96% |
| CCT | 7642 85% | 6434 101% | 6395 102% | 6513 100% | 7730 84% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 75.8 Hz | ≤ 10 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 75.8 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 75.8 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8.1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Nokia 8 Sirocco | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (19 - 30, n=6) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8.1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Nokia 8 Sirocco | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (23 - 23, n=6) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| Basemark GPU 1.1 | |
| 1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8.1 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (11.4 - 13, n=3) | |
| Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8.1 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (10.1 - 12.1, n=2) | |
| 1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8.1 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (14.3 - 15.5, n=3) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8.1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Nokia 8 Sirocco | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (155113 - 169262, n=4) | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8.1 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Nokia 8 Sirocco | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (135848 - 137693, n=3) | |
| VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8.1 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (1681 - 1708, n=3) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 8.1 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (479 - 488, n=3) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (177 - 6114, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158) | |
| Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71) | |
| Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (50.5 - 66.6, n=6) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=211, last 2 years) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158) | |
| Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (9771 - 12802, n=6) | |
| Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (3035 - 3800, n=6) | |
| Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S | |
| Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66) | |
| Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (57 - 72, n=6) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158) | |
| Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71) | |
| Nokia 8 Sirocco (Chrome 66) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (166 - 209, n=6) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Nokia 8.1 | Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 | Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S | Sony Xperia XZ2 | Nokia 8 Sirocco | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 46% | 481% | 47% | 119% | 49% | 1188% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 279.3 | 426.6 53% | 756 171% | 679 143% | 738 164% | 273 ? -2% | 1505 ? 439% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 203.8 | 194.6 -5% | 208.1 2% | 198.7 -3% | 211.6 4% | 176.8 ? -13% | 1112 ? 446% |
| Random Read 4KB | 69.9 | 116.8 67% | 135.1 93% | 149.4 114% | 140.7 101% | 59.1 ? -15% | 247 ? 253% |
| Random Write 4KB | 7.3 | 19.79 171% | 128.4 1659% | 17 133% | 22.4 207% | 31.7 ? 334% | 271 ? 3612% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 84.7 ? | 73.7 ? -13% | 34.25 ? -60% | 77.4 ? -9% | |||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 58.3 ? | 59.7 ? 2% | 30.12 ? -48% | 58.3 ? 0% |
| Asphalt 9: Legends | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| High Quality | 29 fps | ||
| Standard / low | 29 fps | ||
| Arena of Valor | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| min | 60 fps | ||
| high HD | 60 fps | ||
| Shadow Fight 3 | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| high | 60 fps | ||
| minimal | 60 fps | ||
PUBG Compare
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.1 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Nokia 8.1 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 62.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 62.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 62.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (120.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.05 / 0.3 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.8 / 1.5 / 1.8 Watt |
| Carga |
3.2 / 5.4 Watt |
    
| |
| Nokia 8.1 3500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 3800 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S 3400 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ2 3180 mAh | Nokia 8 Sirocco 3260 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -24% | -40% | -35% | -5% | 0% | -25% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.8 | 1.06 -33% | 0.75 6% | 0.72 10% | 0.78 2% | 0.772 ? 3% | 0.897 ? -12% |
| Idle Average * | 1.5 | 1.94 -29% | 2.25 -50% | 2.21 -47% | 1.53 -2% | 1.474 ? 2% | 1.452 ? 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.8 | 1.98 -10% | 2.26 -26% | 2.22 -23% | 1.57 13% | 1.882 ? -5% | 1.629 ? 9% |
| Load Average * | 3.2 | 3.56 -11% | 4.89 -53% | 4.6 -44% | 3.49 -9% | 3.33 ? -4% | 5.55 ? -73% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.4 | 7.49 -39% | 9.6 -78% | 9.34 -73% | 6.96 -29% | 5.2 ? 4% | 8.31 ? -54% |
* ... smaller is better
| Nokia 8.1 3500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 3800 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S 3400 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ2 3180 mAh | Nokia 8 Sirocco 3260 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -0% | -6% | -19% | 1% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1682 | 1780 6% | 1678 0% | 1402 -17% | 1603 -5% |
| H.264 | 857 | 1005 17% | 718 -16% | 722 -16% | 725 -15% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 738 | 689 -7% | 716 -3% | 679 -8% | 693 -6% |
| Load | 246 | 205 -17% | 239 -3% | 159 -35% | 317 29% |
Pro
Contra
A faixa de $450 para smartphones é um mercado difícil, que se tornou ainda mais competitivo com os carros-chefes do ano passado cujo preço agora está abaixando. No papel, parecia que o Nokia 8.1 poderia ter dificuldades contra de aparelhos como o Sony Xperia XZ2, mas a HMD Global fez um ótimo trabalho na criação de um smartphone muito completo que tem muito a oferecer.
O dispositivo tem um design elegante e premium, que até ameaça aos smartphones mais caros uma corrida pelo seu dinheiro. Além disso, seu SoC moderno pode competir com chips mais antigos e tem uma excelente duração de bateria. Sua tela é tão brilhante quanto as encontradas nos carros-chefe do ano passado, e será capturada sob a luz direta do sol. Além disso, suas câmeras nos impressionaram durante nossos testes, mesmo que não tenham alguns dos truques que muitos smartphones emblemáticos têm.
O Nokia 8.1 faz o básico bem e dispensa frivolidades para confundir as linhas entre os smartphones de gama média e topo de gama.
No entanto, o Nokia 8.1 tem suas desvantagens. A HMD Global equipou-o com armazenamento flash eMMC lento, e há menos bandas LTE do que gostaríamos de ver. Além disso, sua tela possui um valor de preto comparativamente alto e uma taxa de contraste fraca. No entanto, se você é um purista do Android e deseja uma experiência próxima à de um carro-chefe a um preço acessível, o Nokia 8.1 deve estar na lista de desejos do seu próximo smartphone.
Nokia 8.1
-
02/06/2019 v6(old)
Florian Schmitt
Pricecompare
