Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto E5 Plus

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Tanja Hinum-Balaz, 11/09/2018

Good price-to-performance ratio. O Motorola Moto E5 Plus combina sua enorme bateria de 5000 mAh com um preço baixo. Além disso, também possui uma tela grande e uma carcaça lisa. Leia nossa análise para saber se vale a pena comprar o Moto E5 Plus.

Motorola Moto E5 Plus (Moto Serie)
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 308
Memória
3072 MB 
Pantalha
6 polegadas 18:9, 1440 x 720 pixel 268 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 25.5 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 128 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: sensor de movimento, sensor de proximidade, microUSB
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B38/​B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.4 x 160.9 x 75.3
Bateria
19 Wh, 5000 mAh Lítio-Ion, Carga rápida
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix f/​2.0, Detecção facial, autofocus, laser autofocus, LED flash, video @1080p/​30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.0, LED flash
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono frontal, Teclado: Teclado virtual, carregador, cabo USB, 24 Meses Garantia, Rádio FM, LTE Cat 4 (150Mbps/​50Mbps), SAR vaule: 0,898 W/kg (head), 1.473 W/kg (body), fanless
peso
197 g, Suprimento de energia: 69 g
Preço
200 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Motorola Moto E5 Plus

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=306)
211 MBit/s ∼100% +388%
Ulefone Armor X
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
98.3 MBit/s ∼47% +128%
Umidigi S2 Lite
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 32 GB eMMC Flash
56.5 MBit/s ∼27% +31%
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.7 MBit/s ∼25% +22%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Adreno 308, 425, 32 GB eMMC Flash
43.2 (min: 36, max: 52) MBit/s ∼20%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
42.1 MBit/s ∼20% -3%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=306)
206 MBit/s ∼100% +482%
Ulefone Armor X
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
103 MBit/s ∼50% +191%
Umidigi S2 Lite
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 32 GB eMMC Flash
57.6 MBit/s ∼28% +63%
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53.4 MBit/s ∼26% +51%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.8 MBit/s ∼23% +32%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Adreno 308, 425, 32 GB eMMC Flash
35.4 (min: 23, max: 51) MBit/s ∼17%
0102030405060Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø42.7 (36-52)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø35.5 (23-51)
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – copse
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – copse
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Motorola Moto E5 Plus – overview
GPS Motorola Moto E5 Plus – overview
GPS Motorola Moto E5 Plus – copse
GPS Motorola Moto E5 Plus – copse
GPS Motorola Moto E5 Plus – bridge
GPS Motorola Moto E5 Plus – bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Shot of the test chart
Shot of the test chart
Test chart: detail
Test chart: detail
ColorChecker: The reference colors are located in the bottom half of each square.
ColorChecker: The reference colors are located in the bottom half of each square.
471
cd/m²
498
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
478
cd/m²
518
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
477
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
473
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 518 cd/m² Médio: 481 cd/m² Minimum: 6.55 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
Contraste: 609:1 (Preto: 0.85 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.47 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 5.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.318
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
IPS, 1440x720, 6
Ulefone Armor X
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5
Umidigi S2 Lite
IPS, 1440x720, 6
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Screen
25%
27%
-1%
16%
Brightness middle
518
564
9%
701
35%
417
-19%
425
-18%
Brightness
481
541
12%
720
50%
394
-18%
425
-12%
Brightness Distribution
87
91
5%
87
0%
87
0%
93
7%
Black Level *
0.85
0.37
56%
0.5
41%
0.52
39%
0.37
56%
Contrast
609
1524
150%
1402
130%
802
32%
1149
89%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.47
5.1
-14%
4.97
-11%
5.8
-30%
4.7
-5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.04
9.6
-19%
13.31
-66%
9.5
-18%
8.3
-3%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.4
5.4
-0%
3.3
39%
5.2
4%
4.6
15%
Gamma
2.318 95%
2.1 105%
2.2 100%
2.76 80%
2.17 101%
CCT
7134 91%
7755 84%
8056 81%
7467 87%
7445 87%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2294 Hz ≤ 10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2294 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2294 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8931 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 27 ms rise
↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
1380 Points ∼31%
Ulefone Armor X
1416 Points ∼31% +3%
Umidigi S2 Lite
1762 Points ∼39% +28%
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL
2089 Points ∼46% +51%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
952 Points ∼21% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (1113 - 1460, n=9)
1337 Points ∼30% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=197)
4524 Points ∼100% +228%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
883 Points ∼20%
Ulefone Armor X
1847 Points ∼43% +109%
Umidigi S2 Lite
2671 Points ∼62% +202%
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL
2466 Points ∼57% +179%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
1562 Points ∼36% +77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (883 - 1939, n=11)
1753 Points ∼41% +99%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=247)
4308 Points ∼100% +388%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
541 Points ∼43%
Ulefone Armor X
662 Points ∼52% +22%
Umidigi S2 Lite
624 Points ∼49% +15%
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL
651 Points ∼51% +20%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
556 Points ∼44% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (541 - 692, n=11)
657 Points ∼52% +21%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=248)
1270 Points ∼100% +135%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
2829 Points ∼62%
Ulefone Armor X
3184 Points ∼70% +13%
Umidigi S2 Lite
3348 Points ∼74% +18%
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL
3827 Points ∼84% +35%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
2768 Points ∼61% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2829 - 3629, n=11)
3272 Points ∼72% +16%
Average of class Smartphone (3146 - 9868, n=255)
4555 Points ∼100% +61%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
3681 Points ∼70%
Ulefone Armor X
4298 Points ∼81% +17%
Umidigi S2 Lite
4371 Points ∼83% +19%
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL
5290 Points ∼100% +44%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3624 Points ∼69% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (0 - 4813, n=11)
4040 Points ∼76% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (6412 - 13531, n=423)
4958 Points ∼94% +35%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
375 Points ∼22%
Ulefone Armor X
658 Points ∼39% +75%
Umidigi S2 Lite
1239 Points ∼73% +230%
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL
1219 Points ∼72% +225%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
733 Points ∼43% +95%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (375 - 902, n=10)
814 Points ∼48% +117%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=292)
1689 Points ∼100% +350%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
248 Points ∼12%
Ulefone Armor X
167 Points ∼8% -33%
Umidigi S2 Lite
478 Points ∼23% +93%
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL
496 Points ∼24% +100%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
129 Points ∼6% -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (118 - 250, n=10)
235 Points ∼11% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=292)
2068 Points ∼100% +734%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
268 Points ∼15%
Ulefone Armor X
200 Points ∼12% -25%
Umidigi S2 Lite
554 Points ∼32% +107%
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL
571 Points ∼33% +113%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
159 Points ∼9% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (145 - 298, n=10)
278 Points ∼16% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7856, n=293)
1734 Points ∼100% +547%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
851 Points ∼55%
Ulefone Armor X
581 Points ∼38% -32%
Umidigi S2 Lite
1127 Points ∼73% +32%
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL
1212 Points ∼79% +42%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
753 Points ∼49% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (622 - 907, n=11)
862 Points ∼56% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4215, n=384)
1540 Points ∼100% +81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
55 Points ∼3%
Ulefone Armor X
129 Points ∼8% +135%
Umidigi S2 Lite
477 Points ∼29% +767%
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL
502 Points ∼31% +813%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
133 Points ∼8% +142%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (31 - 55, n=11)
45.2 Points ∼3% -18%
Average of class Smartphone (46 - 8312, n=384)
1632 Points ∼100% +2867%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
69 Points ∼5%
Ulefone Armor X
156 Points ∼11% +126%
Umidigi S2 Lite
547 Points ∼39% +693%
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL
577 Points ∼42% +736%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
163 Points ∼12% +136%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (39 - 70, n=11)
57.3 Points ∼4% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 6454, n=392)
1387 Points ∼100% +1910%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
3958 Points ∼31%
Ulefone Armor X
10195 Points ∼79% +158%
Umidigi S2 Lite
9984 Points ∼78% +152%
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL
10364 Points ∼80% +162%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
8390 Points ∼65% +112%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
8390 Points ∼65% +112%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3958 - 10556, n=11)
9501 Points ∼74% +140%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=539)
12880 Points ∼100% +225%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
5480 Points ∼30%
Ulefone Armor X
3585 Points ∼20% -35%
Umidigi S2 Lite
9716 Points ∼54% +77%
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL
9627 Points ∼54% +76%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3183 Points ∼18% -42%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3183 Points ∼18% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2546 - 5547, n=11)
5222 Points ∼29% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=539)
17994 Points ∼100% +228%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
5049 Points ∼33%
Ulefone Armor X
4188 Points ∼28% -17%
Umidigi S2 Lite
9774 Points ∼65% +94%
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL
9782 Points ∼65% +94%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3692 Points ∼24% -27%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3692 Points ∼24% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2951 - 6186, n=11)
5748 Points ∼38% +14%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=540)
15114 Points ∼100% +199%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
7.7 fps ∼25%
Ulefone Armor X
5.9 fps ∼19% -23%
Umidigi S2 Lite
17 fps ∼54% +121%
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL
16 fps ∼51% +108%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
6 fps ∼19% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3.4 - 7.8, n=11)
7.29 fps ∼23% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=564)
31.4 fps ∼100% +308%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
13 fps ∼52%
Ulefone Armor X
9.2 fps ∼37% -29%
Umidigi S2 Lite
25 fps ∼100% +92%
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL
25 fps ∼100% +92%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
11 fps ∼44% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (6.4 - 14, n=11)
12.9 fps ∼52% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=567)
25 fps ∼100% +92%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
2.8 fps ∼17%
Ulefone Armor X
2.7 fps ∼16% -4%
Umidigi S2 Lite
6.9 fps ∼41% +146%
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL
7.1 fps ∼42% +154%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
2.2 fps ∼13% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (1.3 - 2.8, n=11)
2.65 fps ∼16% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=486)
16.8 fps ∼100% +500%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
5.6 fps ∼35%
Ulefone Armor X
5.1 fps ∼32% -9%
Umidigi S2 Lite
13 fps ∼81% +132%
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL
14 fps ∼88% +150%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
4.8 fps ∼30% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3.7 - 6.4, n=11)
5.65 fps ∼35% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=489)
16 fps ∼100% +186%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor X
1.6 fps ∼11%
Umidigi S2 Lite
4.6 fps ∼32%
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL
4.6 fps ∼32%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
1.4 fps ∼10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (0 - 0, n=3)
0 fps ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 88, n=349)
14.3 fps ∼100%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Ulefone Armor X
3.3 fps ∼24%
Umidigi S2 Lite
9.9 fps ∼71%
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL
10 fps ∼72%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
3.4 fps ∼24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (0 - 0, n=3)
0 fps ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 110, n=352)
13.9 fps ∼100%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
46450 Points ∼39%
Ulefone Armor X
46435 Points ∼39% 0%
Umidigi S2 Lite
56639 Points ∼48% +22%
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL
54578 Points ∼46% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (32557 - 46710, n=6)
42950 Points ∼36% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=170)
118332 Points ∼100% +155%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
39106 Points ∼51%
Ulefone Armor X
37586 Points ∼49% -4%
Umidigi S2 Lite
43125 Points ∼56% +10%
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL
42798 Points ∼56% +9%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
30619 Points ∼40% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (30924 - 39106, n=12)
36655 Points ∼48% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 254229, n=389)
76442 Points ∼100% +95%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
664 Points ∼81%
Ulefone Armor X
7 Points ∼1% -99%
Umidigi S2 Lite
607 Points ∼74% -9%
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL
816 Points ∼100% +23%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
620 Points ∼76% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (616 - 802, n=11)
694 Points ∼85% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=499)
698 Points ∼86% +5%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
433 Points ∼25%
Ulefone Armor X
188 Points ∼11% -57%
Umidigi S2 Lite
645 Points ∼37% +49%
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL
715 Points ∼41% +65%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
208 Points ∼12% -52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (428 - 447, n=11)
439 Points ∼25% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=499)
1737 Points ∼100% +301%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
794 Points ∼64%
Ulefone Armor X
900 Points ∼72% +13%
Umidigi S2 Lite
840 Points ∼68% +6%
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL
742 Points ∼60% -7%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
591 Points ∼48% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (502 - 1372, n=11)
778 Points ∼63% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=499)
1244 Points ∼100% +57%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
1245 Points ∼50%
Ulefone Armor X
1491 Points ∼59% +20%
Umidigi S2 Lite
1870 Points ∼74% +50%
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL
1761 Points ∼70% +41%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
1086 Points ∼43% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (1043 - 1477, n=11)
1297 Points ∼52% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=499)
2512 Points ∼100% +102%
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
730 Points ∼58%
Ulefone Armor X
206 Points ∼16% -72%
Umidigi S2 Lite
886 Points ∼71% +21%
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL
935 Points ∼75% +28%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
536 Points ∼43% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (371 - 891, n=11)
712 Points ∼57% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=503)
1255 Points ∼100% +72%

Legend

 
Motorola Moto E5 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Ulefone Armor X Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Umidigi S2 Lite Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=422)
36.7 Points ∼100% +107%
Umidigi S2 Lite (Chrome 67)
19.177 Points ∼52% +8%
Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66)
18.148 Points ∼49% +2%
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL (Chrome 64)
17.9 Points ∼49% +1%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus (Chrome 70)
17.765 Points ∼48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (15.9 - 18.7, n=10)
17.6 Points ∼48% -1%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)
14.55 Points ∼40% -18%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=558)
5562 Points ∼100% +71%
Umidigi S2 Lite (Chrome 67)
3506 Points ∼63% +8%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus (Chrome 70)
3250 Points ∼58%
Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66)
3151 Points ∼57% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2503 - 3289, n=11)
2953 Points ∼53% -9%
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL (Chrome 64)
2939 Points ∼53% -10%
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)
2273 Points ∼41% -30%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60)
17405 ms * ∼100% -37%
Ulefone Armor X (Chrome 66)
15875.7 ms * ∼91% -25%
Umidigi S2 Lite (Chrome 67)
13114 ms * ∼75% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (10742 - 16192, n=11)
12977 ms * ∼75% -2%
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL (Chrome 64)
12881 ms * ∼74% -1%
Motorola Moto E5 Plus (Chrome 70)
12723 ms * ∼73%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=578)
11474 ms * ∼66% +10%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola Moto E5 PlusUlefone Armor XUmidigi S2 LiteAsus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KLLenovo Moto E4 PlusAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-33%
-29%
-26%
-42%
-32%
-35%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60.68 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
62.57 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
56.5
-7%
57.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
46.6
-23%
47.1 (3.4 - 87.1, n=111)
-22%
45.5 (3.4 - 87.1, n=318)
-25%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
81.54 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
77.5
-8%
84.38 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
66.3
-21%
66.3 (8.2 - 96.5, n=111)
-21%
63.8 (8.2 - 96.5, n=318)
-24%
Random Write 4KB
56.14
10.17
-82%
11.6
-79%
12.3
-78%
29.4
-48%
18.9 (0.75 - 77.3, n=151)
-66%
16.1 (0.14 - 164, n=607)
-71%
Random Read 4KB
62.71
14.7
-77%
36.4
-42%
39.3
-37%
19.15
-69%
36.3 (3.59 - 117, n=151)
-42%
38.3 (1.59 - 173, n=607)
-39%
Sequential Write 256KB
137.89
82.85
-40%
75
-46%
70.8
-49%
42
-70%
95 (14.8 - 189, n=151)
-31%
79.9 (2.99 - 246, n=607)
-42%
Sequential Read 256KB
248.49
255.34
3%
271
9%
273
10%
194.4
-22%
230 (25.8 - 440, n=151)
-7%
230 (12.1 - 895, n=607)
-7%
Carga Máxima
 32.7 °C30.7 °C32 °C 
 32.4 °C30.7 °C31.6 °C 
 31.7 °C31 °C31.6 °C 
Máximo: 32.7 °C
Médio: 31.6 °C
33.4 °C32.7 °C32.1 °C
32.7 °C32.1 °C31.4 °C
31.8 °C32.1 °C30.8 °C
Máximo: 33.4 °C
Médio: 32.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  43.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.333.52538.128.83128.528.84031.436.15036.6386324.629.28024.128.710020.524.31251922.316016.924.420019.131.325016.633.431513.936.94001544.750014.648.963012.356.180011.860100011.865.8125011.966.4160011.464.6200011.264.4250011.565.5315011.362.3400010.959.9500010.557.4630010.762.7800010.669.31000010.565.81250010.660.91600010.648.7SPL57.22476N10.40.534.3median 11.8median 59.9Delta2.212.631.529.231.529.328.629.328.328.728.332.434.632.427.527.727.525.824.825.826.331.526.328.333.828.334.328.334.333.522.933.540.121.140.144.42044.448.42048.453.42253.459.922.959.965.519.365.566.918.366.971.818.371.872.517.972.57116.47172.516.572.573.216.773.271.216.271.273.216.173.27916.27979.816.179.871.116.171.165.616.165.66516654816.14885.829.985.862.11.462.1median 65.6median 17.9median 65.6122.812hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto E5 PlusLenovo Moto E4 Plus
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto E5 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo Moto E4 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.5 / 2 Watt
Carga midlight 3.2 / 4.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
5000 mAh
Ulefone Armor X
5500 mAh
Umidigi S2 Lite
5100 mAh
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL
5000 mAh
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
5000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-29%
-30%
-1%
0%
-39%
-11%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
1.22
-36%
0.8
11%
0.67
26%
0.89
1%
1.245 (0.54 - 4.02, n=11)
-38%
0.88 (0.2 - 3.4, n=636)
2%
Idle Average *
1.5
2.07
-38%
1.6
-7%
1.63
-9%
1.87
-25%
2.43 (1.2 - 6, n=11)
-62%
1.719 (0.6 - 6.2, n=635)
-15%
Idle Maximum *
2
2.14
-7%
3.5
-75%
1.77
11%
1.98
1%
2.79 (1.62 - 6.64, n=11)
-40%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=636)
-0%
Load Average *
3.2
4.92
-54%
4.6
-44%
3.68
-15%
3.04
5%
4.44 (2.9 - 9.6, n=11)
-39%
4.04 (0.8 - 10.8, n=630)
-26%
Load Maximum *
4.9
5.4
-10%
6.5
-33%
5.84
-19%
4.01
18%
5.58 (4.3 - 7.34, n=11)
-14%
5.75 (1.2 - 14.2, n=630)
-17%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
17h 58min
Motorola Moto E5 Plus
5000 mAh
Ulefone Armor X
5500 mAh
Umidigi S2 Lite
5100 mAh
Asus ZenFone 4 Max ZC554KL
5000 mAh
Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-22%
-40%
-12%
-27%
Reader / Idle
WiFi v1.3
1078
845
-22%
645
-40%
952
-12%
788
-27%
Load

Pro

+ Boas câmeras
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Desempenho aceitável
+ Sem superaquecimento
+ Armazenamento veloz

Contra

- Wi-Fi lento
- Alto valor de preto
- Slot para cartões microSD dedicados
In review: Motorola Moto E5 Plus.
In review: Motorola Moto E5 Plus.

O Motorola Moto E5 Plus é um smartphone grande com uma bateria de longa duração, uma tela grande, desempenho suficiente e um design elegante. Ele herda o lento Wi-Fi de seu predecessor, e agora ele também vem com aplicativos bloatware. O brilho da tela é distribuído de forma desigual e o valor de preto é atrozmente alto. O trem da negatividade para neste lugar: O armazenamento interno é rápido, o smartphone nunca superaquece e o consumo de energia está dentro da norma. Quando comparado com o predecessor Moto E4 Plus, nosso dispositivo de análise oferece melhor duração da bateria e mais desempenho. O Moto E5 Plus também possui boas câmeras, quando comparado a outros smartphones nessa faixa de preço.

Aqueles que precisam de um smartphone com um longo tempo de duração da bateria não ficarão decepcionados com o Moto E5 Plus. No entanto, o fabricante deve fazer algumas melhorias na tela na próxima geração. 

É difícil encontrar um smartphone que dure tanto quanto o Motorola Moto E5 Plus. No entanto, a longa duração da bateria tem um custo associado a ela: O smartphone pesa um pouco. Tudo somado, o Moto E5 Plus oferece não apenas uma boa relação preço-bateria, mas também uma boa relação preço-desempenho. 

Motorola Moto E5 Plus - 11/07/2018 v6
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
84%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
84%
Conectividade
38 / 60 → 63%
Peso
88%
Bateria
100%
Pantalha
74%
Desempenho do jogos
6 / 63 → 10%
Desempenho da aplicação
38 / 70 → 55%
Temperatura
93%
Ruído
100%
Audio
55 / 91 → 60%
Camera
68%
Médio
69%
79%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto E5 Plus
Florian Schmitt, 2018-11- 9 (Update: 2018-11-12)