Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto G8 Power: Bastante duração da bateria e boas câmeras

Duração de bateria sem fim. Com o Moto G8 Power, a Motorola refinou o conceito de um smartphone barato com bateria de longa duração. Seu hardware não é apenas adequado para o uso diário, mas também possui câmeras surpreendentemente boas. Continue lendo para descobrir o que mais o Moto G8 Power oferece além da duração da bateria e câmeras decentes.
Android Touchscreen Smartphone
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Moto G8 Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 260
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 610
Memória
4 GB 
Pantalha
6.40 polegadas 19:9, 2300 x 1080 pixel 397 PPI, capacitive, IPS, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 51 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de 3,5 mm, USB Type-C, Card Reader: microSD (até 512 GB, FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 5, 2G GSM (2/3/5/8), 3G, Dual SIM, LTE
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 10 x 156 x 76
Bateria
5000 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix 16 MP (ƒ/1.7, 1.12 µm) + 2 MP (ƒ/2.2, 1.75 µm) macro + 8 MP (ƒ/2.2, 1.12 µm) ultra-wide angle, 8 MP (ƒ/2.2, 1.12 µm) telephoto 2x optical zoom
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix , ƒ/2.0, 1 µm
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2 alto-falantes, Teclado: onscreen, Adaptador de força USB, cabo USB Type-C, SIM tool, capa protetora, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR value (head): 0.914 W/kg, SAR value (body): 1.79 W/kg, LTE speeds: 400 MBit/s (download), 75 MBit/s (upload)
peso
197 g, Suprimento de energia: 80 g
Preço
230 Euro
Links
Motorola página inicial
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
78.1 %
03/2020
Motorola Moto G8 Power
SD 665, Adreno 610		197 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.40"2300x1080
80.6 %
12/2019
Sharp Aquos V
SD 835, Adreno 540		173 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash5.90"2160x1080
77.6 %
10/2019
Nokia 6.2
SD 636, Adreno 509		180 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.30"2340x1080
78.4 %
09/2019
Xiaomi Mi A3
SD 665, Adreno 610		173.8 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.09"1560x720
80.2 %
01/2020
TCL Plex
SD 675, Adreno 612		192 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.53"2340x1080
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Motorola Moto G8 Power

Size comparison

❌
162.2 mm 76.56 mm 7.99 mm 192 g159.9 mm 75.15 mm 8.25 mm 180 g156 mm 76 mm 10 mm 197 g157 mm 76 mm 9 mm 173 g153.5 mm 71.9 mm 8.5 mm 173.8 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Sharp Aquos V
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
409 (342min - 464max) MBit/s +811%
TCL Plex
Adreno 612, SD 675, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
287 (250min - 308max) MBit/s +539%
Nokia 6.2
Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
284 (240min - 307max) MBit/s +533%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
172 (2min - 282max) MBit/s +283%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
44.9 (2min - 75max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Sharp Aquos V
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
468 (406min - 517max) MBit/s +728%
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s +565%
TCL Plex
Adreno 612, SD 675, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
359 (330min - 369max) MBit/s +535%
Nokia 6.2
Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
325 (280min - 342max) MBit/s +475%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
158 (18min - 227max) MBit/s +180%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
56.5 (11min - 75max) MBit/s
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Motorola Moto G8 Power; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø56.4 (11-75)
Motorola Moto G8 Power; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø44.8 (2-75)
GPS test: Motorola Moto G8 Power - Overview
GPS test: Motorola Moto G8 Power - Overview
GPS test: Motorola Moto G8 Power - Bridge
GPS test: Motorola Moto G8 Power - Bridge
GPS test: Motorola Moto G8 Power - Crossing
GPS test: Motorola Moto G8 Power - Crossing
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Crossing
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Crossing

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
11.8 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
12 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
6 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G8 Power: 7.58 ∆E min: 1.73 - max: 12.84 ∆E
ColorChecker
27.2 ∆E
47.5 ∆E
37 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
41.2 ∆E
54.8 ∆E
45.9 ∆E
32.9 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
56.4 ∆E
55.3 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
31.7 ∆E
63 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
39.5 ∆E
55.9 ∆E
59.9 ∆E
45.8 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G8 Power: 40.39 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 63.03 ∆E
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart at 1 lux
490
cd/m²		470
cd/m²		491
cd/m²
486
cd/m²		462
cd/m²		494
cd/m²
495
cd/m²		467
cd/m²		493
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 495 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 483.1 cd/m² Minimum: 3.5 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 462 cd/m²
Contraste: 711:1 (Preto: 0.65 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
92.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.303
Motorola Moto G8 Power
IPS, 2300x1080, 6.40		Sharp Aquos V
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.90		Nokia 6.2
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.30		Xiaomi Mi A3
AMOLED, 1560x720, 6.09		TCL Plex
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.53
Screen
15%
25%
-15%
21%
Brightness middle
462
507
10%
611
32%
348
-25%
432
-6%
Brightness
483
486
1%
582
20%
355
-27%
418
-13%
Brightness Distribution
93
91
-2%
91
-2%
91
-2%
93
0%
Black Level *
0.65
0.55
15%
0.4
38%
0.43
34%
Contrast
711
922
30%
1528
115%
1005
41%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.7
4.43
22%
5.2
9%
5.86
-3%
3.4
40%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.9
7.13
20%
10.2
-15%
15.6
-75%
6
33%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.5
5
23%
6.1
6%
3.6
45%
3.8
42%
Gamma
2.303 96%
2.18 101%
2.21 100%
2.232 99%
2.14 103%
CCT
8073 81%
7739 84%
8100 80%
7051 92%
6151 106%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 714 Hz
≤ 15 cd/m² brightness

The display backlight flickers at 714 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 cd/m² and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 714 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

As the flickering occurs only on very low brightness settings, it should not be an issue in typical office settings. Nonetheless, use in low light conditions may be straining to the eyes.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).
Geekbench 5.5 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | AnTuTu v8 | BaseMark OS II
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
311 Points
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
386 Points +24%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
486 Points +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (309 - 314, n=8)
311 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=220, last 2 years)
911 Points +193%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1385 Points
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
1669 Points +21%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
924 Points -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1256 - 1421, n=8)
1356 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=220, last 2 years)
2988 Points +116%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
368 Points
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
1908 Points +418%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
351 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (363 - 368, n=5)
366 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (516 - 18876, n=46, last 2 years)
7173 Points +1849%
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
464 Points
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
369 Points -20%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
487 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (432 - 483, n=5)
455 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (281 - 18656, n=52, last 2 years)
7719 Points +1564%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8804 Points
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
9927 Points +13%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6696 Points -24%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7984 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (7437 - 9051, n=10)
8163 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)
15091 Points +71%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6963 Points
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
7510 Points +8%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5965 Points -14%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6396 Points -8%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
7950 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6189 - 11432, n=12)
6985 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)
10872 Points +56%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
25046 Points
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
19635 Points -22%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
23693 Points -5%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
22767 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (22445 - 25046, n=11)
23846 Points -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
25161 Points
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
21067 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
25219 Points 0%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
26320 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (15403 - 25351, n=11)
24085 Points -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24652 Points
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15876 Points -36%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19552 Points -21%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
15461 Points -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (17865 - 24652, n=11)
20749 Points -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1764 Points
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
5022 Points +185%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1467 Points -17%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1782 Points +1%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1618 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1675 - 1795, n=12)
1751 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)
3766 Points +113%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1626 Points
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
6208 Points +282%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1322 Points -19%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1651 Points +2%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1594 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1564 - 1663, n=12)
1623 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)
4186 Points +157%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2507 Points
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3009 Points +20%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2339 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2471 Points -1%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1708 Points -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2282 - 2596, n=12)
2427 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)
3082 Points +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1809 Points
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
5151 Points +185%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1568 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1787 Points -1%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1621 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1754 - 1810, n=12)
1787 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)
9351 Points +417%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1678 Points
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
6417 Points +282%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1389 Points -17%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1674 Points 0%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1611 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1650 - 1692, n=12)
1669 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)
16352 Points +874%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2493 Points
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3047 Points +22%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2288 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2343 Points -6%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1657 Points -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2199 - 2503, n=12)
2369 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)
4426 Points +78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1137 Points
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3751 Points +230%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
945 Points -17%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1081 Points -5%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
937 Points -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1076 - 1152, n=12)
1119 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 7890, n=106, last 2 years)
2738 Points +141%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
984 Points
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
4031 Points +310%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
809 Points -18%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
931 Points -5%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
829 Points -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (927 - 999, n=12)
970 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 9814, n=106, last 2 years)
2733 Points +178%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2493 Points
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3018 Points +21%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2335 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2477 Points -1%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1724 Points -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2212 - 2580, n=12)
2418 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 4679, n=106, last 2 years)
3156 Points +27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1151 Points
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
4054 Points +252%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
977 Points -15%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1135 Points -1%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1057 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1097 - 1151, n=11)
1135 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=183, last 2 years)
6705 Points +483%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
988 Points
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
4468 Points +352%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
855 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
987 Points 0%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
955 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (980 - 999, n=11)
988 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=182, last 2 years)
9675 Points +879%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2488 Points
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3062 Points +23%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2337 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2387 Points -4%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1684 Points -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2154 - 2541, n=11)
2377 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (938 - 8480, n=182, last 2 years)
4216 Points +69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1047 Points
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3288 Points +214%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
926 Points -12%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1049 Points 0%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1038 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1035 - 1140, n=12)
1074 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (365 - 6439, n=100, last 2 years)
2654 Points +153%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
904 Points
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
3580 Points +296%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
789 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
908 Points 0%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
916 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (897 - 995, n=12)
933 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 8601, n=100, last 2 years)
2829 Points +213%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2354 Points
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
2559 Points +9%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2175 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2300 Points -2%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1952 Points -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2185 - 2444, n=12)
2281 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1667 - 3525, n=100, last 2 years)
2672 Points +14%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
33 fps
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
32 fps -3%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
52 fps +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (30 - 52, n=10)
35.4 fps +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)
84.6 fps +156%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
35 fps -3%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (35 - 37, n=10)
35.9 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)
247 fps +586%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
18 fps
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15 fps -17%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
34 fps +89%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (15 - 34, n=10)
20.7 fps +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)
72.2 fps +301%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19 fps
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps -16%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
20 fps +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (19 - 20, n=10)
19.2 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years)
140.6 fps +640%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
12 fps
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.7 fps -52%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
26 fps +117%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (10 - 27, n=10)
14.6 fps +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)
60.9 fps +408%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps -52%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (13 - 13, n=10)
13 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)
99 fps +662%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6.6 fps
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.4 fps -18%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps +97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (5.7 - 13, n=10)
7.69 fps +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)
43.4 fps +558%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.1 fps
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps -11%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.1 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6.9 - 7.2, n=10)
7.07 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)
59.9 fps +744%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.6 fps
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
24 fps +216%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.4 fps -29%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
15 fps +97%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
8.3 fps +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6.2 - 15, n=12)
9.14 fps +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=227, last 2 years)
43.9 fps +478%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.1 fps
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
26 fps +221%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6 fps -26%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.4 fps +4%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
9.1 fps +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (7.8 - 8.4, n=12)
8.13 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=227, last 2 years)
64 fps +690%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4.5 fps
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
15 fps +233%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2.3 fps -49%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
9.1 fps +102%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
4.9 fps +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (3.9 - 9.1, n=12)
5.53 fps +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 119, n=227, last 2 years)
32.7 fps +627%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps
Sharp Aquos V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096
9.7 fps +246%
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
3.5 fps +25%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps 0%
TCL Plex
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
3 fps +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2.7 - 2.8, n=12)
2.78 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=227, last 2 years)
25.5 fps +811%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
168901 Points
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
145220 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (167305 - 181432, n=9)
171951 Points +2%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2238 Points
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1907 Points -15%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2556 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2001 - 2556, n=9)
2271 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)
5759 Points +157%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4848 Points
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4498 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5089 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (4391 - 5089, n=9)
4825 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)
9672 Points +100%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2864 Points
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2024 Points -29%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
3174 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1804 - 3174, n=9)
2681 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)
6267 Points +119%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1931 Points
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1632 Points -15%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1886 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1881 - 1932, n=9)
1906 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)
14220 Points +636%
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
935 Points
Nokia 6.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
876 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1400 Points +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (926 - 1400, n=9)
1101 Points +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)
1495 Points +60%
JetStream 1.1 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)
104.3 Points +117%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
51 Points +6%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
48.11 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (33.4 - 51, n=8)
47.5 Points -1%
Nokia 6.2 (Chrome 79)
44.44 Points -8%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)
133.1 Points +138%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
58 Points +4%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
56 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (38 - 58, n=9)
50.9 Points -9%
Nokia 6.2 (Chrome 79)
46 Points -18%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years)
33357 Points +285%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
9260 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6133 - 9671, n=9)
8901 Points +3%
Nokia 6.2 (Chrome 79)
8756 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
8675 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Nokia 6.2 (Chrome 79)
5066 ms * -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4434 - 6719, n=9)
4783 ms * -3%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
4664 ms *
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
4584 ms * +2%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * +66%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola Moto G8 PowerSharp Aquos VNokia 6.2Xiaomi Mi A3TCL PlexAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
40%
-4%
29%
38%
-10%
336%
Sequential Read 256KB
300.9
651
116%
296.8
-1%
502
67%
522
73%
273 ?(95.6 - 704, n=201)
-9%
1506 ?(226 - 4512, n=219, last 2 years)
400%
Sequential Write 256KB
181.9
206.2
13%
158.5
-13%
184
1%
199.7
10%
176.8 ?(40 - 274, n=201)
-3%
1115 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=219, last 2 years)
513%
Random Read 4KB
57.7
157.2
172%
78.8
37%
126.9
120%
130.8
127%
59.1 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=201)
2%
247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=219, last 2 years)
328%
Random Write 4KB
132.6
16.8
-87%
14.88
-89%
117.4
-11%
130.1
-2%
31.7 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=201)
-76%
271 ?(13 - 709, n=219, last 2 years)
104%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
69.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
78.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13%
83.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
20%
67.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
74.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
77.4 ?(21.1 - 107.6, n=144)
12%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
49.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
54.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
61.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
24%
50.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
56.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13%
58.3 ?(11.2 - 83.3, n=144)
17%
Carga Máxima
 41.3 °C38.3 °C37.4 °C 
 41.5 °C38.3 °C37.6 °C 
 40 °C37.8 °C37.4 °C 
Máximo: 41.5 °C
Médio: 38.8 °C
36.5 °C38.2 °C41.6 °C
36.2 °C38.4 °C41.1 °C
36 °C38.2 °C40.2 °C
Máximo: 41.6 °C
Médio: 38.5 °C
alimentação elétrica  37.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated); Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2045.247.52543.745.23134.836.94037.640.75039.542.16336.636.38029.130.110028.429.112530.533.916024.742.320022.851.625021.955.431521.559.340019.962.150020.767.763019.271.180018.772.410002275.5125018.274.3160017.873.3200017.770.2250017.872315017.676400017.877.4500017.772.2630018.167.5800018.359.21000018.767.9125001972.61600019.464SPL66.13185.1N191.662.4median 19median 67.7median 73.8Delta3.412.211.429.832.825.224.321.623.124.722.629.631.822.519.825.120.620.120.619.92220.830.217.631.817.638.917.445.216.151.813.957.714.559.616.167.314.572.414.470.613.668.613.972.814.576.114.475.214.871.414.77514.869.214.963.315.1611550.615.144.326.983.90.952.3median 14.9median 611.613.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G8 PowerNokia 6.2
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G8 Power audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 73.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 73.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 73.8% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (125.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Nokia 6.2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 88% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 0.4 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.3 / 1.6 Watt
Carga midlight 3.2 / 7.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Motorola Moto G8 Power
5000 mAh		Nokia 6.2
3500 mAh		Xiaomi Mi A3
4030 mAh		TCL Plex
3820 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-22%
-37%
-21%
-24%
-21%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.72
20%
0.8
11%
0.73
19%
1.017 ?(0.62 - 1.7, n=11)
-13%
0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years)
-0%
Idle Average *
1.3
2.22
-71%
2
-54%
2.17
-67%
1.893 ?(1.3 - 2.3, n=11)
-46%
1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years)
-12%
Idle Maximum *
1.6
2.23
-39%
3.3
-106%
2.23
-39%
2.36 ?(1.6 - 3.5, n=11)
-48%
1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years)
-2%
Load Average *
3.2
3.98
-24%
4.1
-28%
4.56
-43%
3.77 ?(2.61 - 4.7, n=11)
-18%
5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years)
-73%
Load Maximum *
7.1
6.86
3%
7.7
-8%
5.22
26%
6.66 ?(5.12 - 7.7, n=11)
6%
8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years)
-17%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
WiFi Websurfing
16h 42min
Motorola Moto G8 Power
5000 mAh		Sharp Aquos V
3160 mAh		Nokia 6.2
3500 mAh		Xiaomi Mi A3
4030 mAh		TCL Plex
3820 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
1002
718
-28%
611
-39%
985
-2%
616
-39%

Pro

+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Boas câmeras
+ Design robusto
+ Android quase puro

Contra

- Wi-Fi lento
- Tela de baixo contraste

Veredicto - Bom valor pelo dinheiro:

The Motorola Moto G8 Power smartphone review. Test device courtesy of Motorola Germany.
The Motorola Moto G8 Power smartphone review. Test device courtesy of Motorola Germany.

Com o Moto G8 Power, os usuários devem esperar um smartphone com grande duração da bateria acima de tudo. O dispositivo não pode ser criticado a esse respeito, pois durou mais de 16 horas em nossos testes práticos de Wi-Fi. No entanto, o Moto G8 Power oferece mais do que apenas a duração da bateria. Suas câmeras são surpreendentemente boas, por exemplo, assim como sua experiência Android quase puro. No geral, o Moto G8 Power tem um conjunto sólido de hardware para um dispositivo a esse preço.

O Motorola Moto G8 Power convencerá particularmente as pessoas com sua capacidade de duração da bateria.

Enquanto o dispositivo é bem construído, sua bateria grande o torna bastante grosso. Se isso incomoda você é uma questão de gosto, mas o dispositivo fica aquém dos seus concorrentes na conectividade Wi-Fi. A inclusão de suporte apenas para o padrão Wi-Fi 4 é suficiente para a maioria das redes domésticas, mas significa que o Moto G8 Power é superado pela concorrência a esse respeito. No final, o Motorola Moto G8 Power é um aparelho bom e acessível, mas se suas deficiências o incomodam, você dependerá do que você valoriza em um smartphone.

Motorola Moto G8 Power - 03/21/2020 v7
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
80%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
95%
Conectividade
41 / 70 → 59%
Peso
88%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
83%
Desempenho do jogos
13 / 64 → 21%
Desempenho da aplicação
59 / 86 → 68%
Temperatura
90%
Ruído
100%
Audio
75 / 90 → 84%
Camera
59%
Médio
72%
78%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto G8 Power: Bastante duração da bateria e boas câmeras
Mike Wobker, 2020-03-25 (Update: 2020-04- 3)