Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi A3 – O rei do preço-desempenho novamente!

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 09/11/2019

Reduzido ou melhorado? O Xiaomi Mi A3 novamente pretende oferecer muitos recursos de gama média por pouco dinheiro. No entanto, na verdade, não estamos vendo apenas melhorias em comparação com o antecessor. Descubra em nosso teste se o modelo 2019 ainda vale a pena.

Xiaomi Mi A3 (Mi Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 610
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
6.09 polegadas 19.5:9, 1560 x 720 pixel 282 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 53 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 256GB, compartilhada, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: sensor de aceleração, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, USB-C
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B38/​B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.5 x 153.5 x 71.9
Bateria
4030 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Quick Charge 3.0, carga rápida de 18 W
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/​1.79, phase-comparison AF, LED flash, videos at 2160p/​30fps (camera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (camera 2); 2.0MP, depth sharpness (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix 1.6μm, f/​2.0, videos at 1080p/​30fps
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono na borda inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, carregador, cabo USB, capa de silicone, SIM tool, Android One, Mi Community, Mi Store, 24 Meses Garantia, LTE Cat 12/Cat 13: 600 Mbps (download), 150 Mbps (upload); SAR value: 0.301 W/​kg (head), 1.097 W/​kg (body); FM radio; notification LED; A-GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, fanless
peso
173.8 g, Suprimento de energia: 70 g
Preço
200 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Xiaomi Mi A3
Xiaomi Mi A3
Xiaomi Mi A3
Xiaomi Mi A3
Xiaomi Mi A3
Xiaomi Mi A3

Size Comparison

158.6 mm 75.4 mm 7.3 mm 168 g157 mm 75.3 mm 8 mm 172 g155.2 mm 73.4 mm 8 mm 160 g154.8 mm 73.6 mm 8 mm 164 g153.5 mm 71.9 mm 8.5 mm 173.8 g148.95 mm 71.3 mm 8.39 mm 161 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
246 MBit/s ∼100% +56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=434)
226 MBit/s ∼92% +43%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
167 (min: 108, max: 214) MBit/s ∼68% +6%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Adreno 610, 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
158 (min: 18, max: 227) MBit/s ∼64%
Motorola Moto G7
Adreno 506, 632, 64 GB eMMC Flash
112 (min: 94, max: 118) MBit/s ∼46% -29%
Honor 20 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
53.6 (min: 44, max: 57) MBit/s ∼22% -66%
Nokia 4.2
Adreno 505, 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.6 (min: 35, max: 52) MBit/s ∼21% -67%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
333 MBit/s ∼100% +94%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
221 (min: 157, max: 243) MBit/s ∼66% +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=434)
216 MBit/s ∼65% +26%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Adreno 610, 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
172 (min: 2, max: 282) MBit/s ∼52%
Motorola Moto G7
Adreno 506, 632, 64 GB eMMC Flash
112 (min: 107, max: 117) MBit/s ∼34% -35%
Honor 20 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
53.2 (min: 47, max: 58) MBit/s ∼16% -69%
Nokia 4.2
Adreno 505, 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash
35.2 (min: 24, max: 40) MBit/s ∼11% -80%
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – traffic circle
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – traffic circle
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Xiaomi Mi A3 – overview
GPS Xiaomi Mi A3 – overview
GPS Xiaomi Mi A3 – traffic circle
GPS Xiaomi Mi A3 – traffic circle
GPS Xiaomi Mi A3 – bridge
GPS Xiaomi Mi A3 – bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
ColorChecker Photo
12.9 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
5 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi A3: 7.51 ∆E min: 1.86 - max: 14.15 ∆E
Image taken of the test chart
Image taken of the test chart
Test chart - 1 Lux
ColorChecker - 1 Lux
349
cd/m²
357
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
343
cd/m²
348
cd/m²
357
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
352
cd/m²
366
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 376 cd/m² Médio: 354.8 cd/m² Minimum: 3.4 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 348 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.86 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.232
Xiaomi Mi A3
AMOLED, 1560x720, 6.09
Honor 20 Lite
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.21
Motorola Moto G7
IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.21
Xiaomi Mi 6X
LCD IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99
Nokia 4.2
IPS, 1520x720, 5.71
Screen
15%
14%
34%
-3%
-1%
Brightness middle
348
455
31%
471
35%
427
23%
459
32%
445
28%
Brightness
355
456
28%
453
28%
415
17%
441
24%
424
19%
Brightness Distribution
91
94
3%
94
3%
84
-8%
91
0%
91
0%
Black Level *
0.58
0.5
0.2
0.47
0.26
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.86
4.43
24%
5.5
6%
1.95
67%
5.8
1%
5.9
-1%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
15.6
6.81
56%
7.95
49%
4.47
71%
10.7
31%
9.3
40%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.6
5.4
-50%
5
-39%
2.3
36%
7.3
-103%
6.8
-89%
Gamma
2.232 99%
2.248 98%
2.326 95%
2.07 106%
2.28 96%
2.2 100%
CCT
7051 92%
7336 89%
7654 85%
6414 101%
7984 81%
8443 77%
Contrast
784
942
2135
977
1712

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 219 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 219 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 219 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9365 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.7 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5144 Points ∼94%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2631 Points ∼48% -49%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
4006 Points ∼73% -22%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
3133 Points ∼57% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5486 Points ∼100% +7%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3183 Points ∼58% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
5144 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=321)
4685 Points ∼85% -9%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5663 Points ∼97%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5335 Points ∼91% -6%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
4765 Points ∼82% -16%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5426 Points ∼93% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5843 Points ∼100% +3%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3267 Points ∼56% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
5663 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=380)
4703 Points ∼80% -17%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1536 Points ∼95%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1537 Points ∼95% 0%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1256 Points ∼78% -18%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1539 Points ∼95% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1620 Points ∼100% +5%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
891 Points ∼55% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
1536 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=380)
1420 Points ∼88% -8%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6396 Points ∼100%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5829 Points ∼91% -9%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
6038 Points ∼94% -6%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
5855 Points ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
5995 Points ∼94% -6%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
4623 Points ∼72% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
6396 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11440, n=372)
5257 Points ∼82% -18%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7984 Points ∼100%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7388 Points ∼93% -7%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
7187 Points ∼90% -10%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
7004 Points ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
6723 Points ∼84% -16%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6228 Points ∼78% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
7984 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 14439, n=543)
5690 Points ∼71% -29%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2300 Points ∼85%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2336 Points ∼87% +2%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2272 Points ∼84% -1%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
2172 Points ∼81% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
2300 Points ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=58)
2695 Points ∼100% +17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
908 Points ∼33%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1220 Points ∼44% +34%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1121 Points ∼41% +23%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
401 Points ∼15% -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
908 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=58)
2763 Points ∼100% +204%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1049 Points ∼42%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1365 Points ∼54% +30%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1263 Points ∼50% +20%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
490 Points ∼20% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
1049 Points ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=58)
2512 Points ∼100% +139%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2387 Points ∼86%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2109 Points ∼76% -12%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
2206 Points ∼80% -8%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2006 Points ∼73% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2764 Points ∼100% +16%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1500 Points ∼54% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
2387 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4635, n=380)
1959 Points ∼71% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
987 Points ∼56%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
829 Points ∼47% -16%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
467 Points ∼27% -53%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
770 Points ∼44% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1244 Points ∼71% +26%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
413 Points ∼23% -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
987 Points ∼56% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=380)
1759 Points ∼100% +78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1135 Points ∼70%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
958 Points ∼59% -16%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
566 Points ∼35% -50%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
892 Points ∼55% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1417 Points ∼87% +25%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
492 Points ∼30% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
1135 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6875, n=381)
1633 Points ∼100% +44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2343 Points ∼83%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2124 Points ∼75% -9%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
2201 Points ∼78% -6%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1887 Points ∼67% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2815 Points ∼100% +20%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1516 Points ∼54% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
2343 Points ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=409)
1869 Points ∼66% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1674 Points ∼72%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1233 Points ∼53% -26%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
809 Points ∼35% -52%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1065 Points ∼46% -36%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1981 Points ∼85% +18%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
712 Points ∼30% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
1674 Points ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=409)
2338 Points ∼100% +40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1787 Points ∼84%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1360 Points ∼64% -24%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
941 Points ∼44% -47%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1179 Points ∼56% -34%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2121 Points ∼100% +19%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
807 Points ∼38% -55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
1787 Points ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=409)
1966 Points ∼93% +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2477 Points ∼90%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2378 Points ∼86% -4%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
2251 Points ∼82% -9%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2246 Points ∼81% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2757 Points ∼100% +11%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1575 Points ∼57% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
2477 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4492, n=460)
1866 Points ∼68% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
931 Points ∼64%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
710 Points ∼49% -24%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
419 Points ∼29% -55%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
692 Points ∼48% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1164 Points ∼80% +25%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
366 Points ∼25% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
931 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=460)
1451 Points ∼100% +56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1081 Points ∼77%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
841 Points ∼60% -22%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
512 Points ∼37% -53%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
818 Points ∼59% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1335 Points ∼95% +23%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
441 Points ∼32% -59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
1081 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=461)
1398 Points ∼100% +29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2471 Points ∼92%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2441 Points ∼91% -1%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
2273 Points ∼85% -8%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2307 Points ∼86% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2680 Points ∼100% +8%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1568 Points ∼59% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
2471 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4454, n=501)
1730 Points ∼65% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1651 Points ∼87%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
667 Points ∼35% -60%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
780 Points ∼41% -53%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
744 Points ∼39% -55%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1891 Points ∼100% +15%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
704 Points ∼37% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
1651 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=500)
1890 Points ∼100% +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1782 Points ∼88%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
795 Points ∼39% -55%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
913 Points ∼45% -49%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
876 Points ∼43% -51%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2023 Points ∼100% +14%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
802 Points ∼40% -55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
1782 Points ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8136, n=503)
1635 Points ∼81% -8%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19552 Points ∼93%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
16647 Points ∼79% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
21016 Points ∼100% +7%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
12390 Points ∼59% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
19552 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=662)
14069 Points ∼67% -28%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
25219 Points ∼87%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
14475 Points ∼50% -43%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
28984 Points ∼100% +15%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13440 Points ∼46% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
25219 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=660)
21672 Points ∼75% -14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
23693 Points ∼89%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
14907 Points ∼56% -37%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
26731 Points ∼100% +13%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13192 Points ∼49% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
23693 Points ∼89% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=660)
17599 Points ∼66% -26%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps ∼72%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
39 fps ∼78% +8%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
24 fps ∼48% -33%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
34 fps ∼68% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
50 fps ∼100% +39%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
23 fps ∼46% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
36 fps ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=683)
37.5 fps ∼75% +4%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
52 fps ∼100%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
36 fps ∼69% -31%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
23 fps ∼44% -56%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
32 fps ∼62% -38%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
48 fps ∼92% -8%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
34 fps ∼65% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
52 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=692)
27.9 fps ∼54% -46%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
20 fps ∼87%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21 fps ∼91% +5%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
10 fps ∼43% -50%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
19 fps ∼83% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
23 fps ∼100% +15%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
9.8 fps ∼43% -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
20 fps ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=589)
21.6 fps ∼94% +8%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
34 fps ∼100%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
19 fps ∼56% -44%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
9.9 fps ∼29% -71%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
17 fps ∼50% -50%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
21 fps ∼62% -38%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
18 fps ∼53% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
34 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=598)
19.2 fps ∼56% -44%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼73%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
14 fps ∼79% +8%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
6.9 fps ∼39% -47%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
13 fps ∼73% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
15 fps ∼85% +15%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6.4 fps ∼36% -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
13 fps ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=455)
17.7 fps ∼100% +36%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
26 fps ∼100%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
13 fps ∼50% -50%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
6.5 fps ∼25% -75%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
12 fps ∼46% -54%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
14 fps ∼54% -46%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13 fps ∼50% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
26 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=457)
16.6 fps ∼64% -36%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
9.1 fps ∼89%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4.2 fps ∼41% -54%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
2 fps ∼20% -78%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
4.1 fps ∼40% -55%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.9 fps ∼38% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
9.1 fps ∼89% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=173)
10.2 fps ∼100% +12%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼40%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2.6 fps ∼37% -7%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1.2 fps ∼17% -57%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2.6 fps ∼37% -7%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1.2 fps ∼17% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
2.8 fps ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=172)
7.03 fps ∼100% +151%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
15 fps ∼100%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.4 fps ∼43% -57%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
3.6 fps ∼24% -76%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
6.9 fps ∼46% -54%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6.6 fps ∼44% -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
15 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=177)
14.8 fps ∼99% -1%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.4 fps ∼51%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7 fps ∼42% -17%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
3.9 fps ∼24% -54%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
6.4 fps ∼39% -24%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.6 fps ∼22% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
8.4 fps ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=177)
16.5 fps ∼100% +96%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.1 fps ∼59%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7.7 fps ∼64% +8%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
3.9 fps ∼32% -45%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
7.7 fps ∼64% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
9 fps ∼74% +27%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.5 fps ∼29% -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
7.1 fps ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=380)
12.1 fps ∼100% +70%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼100%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.8 fps ∼52% -48%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
3.6 fps ∼28% -72%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
6.8 fps ∼52% -48%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8.6 fps ∼66% -34%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
7 fps ∼54% -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
13 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=384)
10.8 fps ∼83% -17%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
11.99 fps ∼71%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
10.11 fps ∼59% -16%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
4.41 fps ∼26% -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
12 fps ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.24 - 37.4, n=59)
17 fps ∼100% +42%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
10.74 fps ∼76%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8.96 fps ∼63% -17%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6.62 fps ∼47% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
10.7 fps ∼75% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 37.3, n=53)
14.2 fps ∼100% +32%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
4.16 fps ∼24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 39.7, n=50)
17.5 fps ∼100%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
140633 Points ∼99%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
131614 Points ∼93% -6%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
108408 Points ∼76% -23%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
124870 Points ∼88% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
140714 Points ∼99% 0%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
77652 Points ∼55% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
140633 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 462516, n=291)
141726 Points ∼100% +1%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1092 Score ∼51%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
999 Score ∼47% -9%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
552 Score ∼26% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
1092 Score ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 5025, n=57)
2139 Score ∼100% +96%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1400 Points ∼100%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1024 Points ∼73% -27%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1008 Points ∼72% -28%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1051 Points ∼75% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1108 Points ∼79% -21%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
834 Points ∼60% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
1400 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=627)
755 Points ∼54% -46%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1886 Points ∼82%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1462 Points ∼64% -22%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1075 Points ∼47% -43%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
1465 Points ∼64% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2295 Points ∼100% +22%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1000 Points ∼44% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
1886 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=627)
2034 Points ∼89% +8%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
3174 Points ∼100%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3096 Points ∼98% -2%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1963 Points ∼62% -38%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2823 Points ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2470 Points ∼78% -22%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1316 Points ∼41% -59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
3174 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=627)
1505 Points ∼47% -53%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5089 Points ∼97%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5238 Points ∼100% +3%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
4378 Points ∼84% -14%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
4826 Points ∼92% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
4797 Points ∼92% -6%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
2687 Points ∼51% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
5089 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=627)
2953 Points ∼56% -42%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2556 Points ∼100%
Honor 20 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2220 Points ∼87% -13%
Motorola Moto G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 4096
1747 Points ∼68% -32%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072
2140 Points ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2343 Points ∼92% -8%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1310 Points ∼51% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
2556 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=627)
1479 Points ∼58% -42%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=100)
35.5 Points ∼100% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
30.7 Points ∼86% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
30.692 Points ∼86%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chrome 74)
30.18 Points ∼85% -2%
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)
30.008 Points ∼85% -2%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
15.921 Points ∼45% -48%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=89)
39.6 runs/min ∼100% +34%
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)
33 runs/min ∼83% +12%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chome 74)
31.16 runs/min ∼79% +6%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chome 76)
29.5 runs/min ∼74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
29.5 runs/min ∼74% 0%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
18.23 runs/min ∼46% -38%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=158)
66.8 Points ∼100% +15%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chrome 74)
63 Points ∼94% +9%
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)
62 Points ∼93% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67)
61 Points ∼91% +5%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)
58 Points ∼87% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
58 Points ∼87%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
58 Points ∼87% 0%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
38 Points ∼57% -34%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67)
9995 Points ∼100% +8%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chrome 74)
9695 Points ∼97% +5%
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)
9591 Points ∼96% +4%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
9260 Points ∼93%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
9260 Points ∼93% 0%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)
8351 Points ∼84% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=685)
6706 Points ∼67% -28%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
4810 Points ∼48% -48%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=710)
10594 ms * ∼100% -131%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
9768.3 ms * ∼92% -113%
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71)
4900 ms * ∼46% -7%
Honor 20 Lite (Chrome 75)
4852.6 ms * ∼46% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67)
4768.9 ms * ∼45% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
4584 ms * ∼43% -0%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
4583.8 ms * ∼43%
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019 (Chrome 74)
4250.7 ms * ∼40% +7%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Mi A3Honor 20 LiteMotorola Moto G7Huawei P Smart Plus 2019Xiaomi Mi 6XNokia 4.2Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-16%
-7%
-19%
-43%
-45%
1%
-40%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
50.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
66.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
34%
66.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
33%
66.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
33%
65.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
31%
50.8 (17.1 - 71.9, n=27)
1%
49.1 (1.7 - 87.1, n=417)
-2%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
67.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
75.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
12%
86.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
28%
76.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13%
86.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
28%
67.2 (18 - 86.6, n=27)
-1%
67.3 (8.1 - 96.5, n=417)
-1%
Random Write 4KB
117.4
73.1
-38%
75.6
-36%
77.3
-34%
6.89
-94%
4.31
-96%
55.6 (8.77 - 165, n=36)
-53%
21.5 (0.14 - 250, n=735)
-82%
Random Read 4KB
126.9
38.7
-70%
69.3
-45%
40.3
-68%
72.98
-42%
17.51
-86%
134 (78.2 - 173, n=36)
6%
46.6 (1.59 - 196, n=735)
-63%
Sequential Write 256KB
184
200.9
9%
216
17%
152.8
-17%
203.7
11%
18.17
-90%
198 (133 - 388, n=36)
8%
95.5 (2.99 - 590, n=735)
-48%
Sequential Read 256KB
502.2
288.1
-43%
297
-41%
295.4
-41%
271.98
-46%
220.39
-56%
719 (502 - 895, n=36)
43%
269 (12.1 - 1504, n=735)
-46%
0102030405060Tooltip
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.30.2.4: Ø58.7 (49-60)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.30.2.4: Ø59.9 (55-60)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.7.3a: Ø17.3 (7-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.7.3a: Ø25.4 (16-31)
Carga Máxima
 43 °C37.9 °C35.5 °C 
 42.7 °C38.2 °C35.7 °C 
 42 °C38.5 °C35.5 °C 
Máximo: 43 °C
Médio: 38.8 °C
34.8 °C37.6 °C41.8 °C
34.9 °C38.3 °C42.6 °C
35 °C38.2 °C41.1 °C
Máximo: 42.6 °C
Médio: 38.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  34.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.939.22543.842.63136.539.34036.145.25045.141.36335.740.88026.73510028.533.912526.535.416024.843.720024.648.42502452.831522.556.44002060.950020.465.663019.869.180019.369.9100023.875.5125017.875.116001878.2200017.376.9250016.675.5315015.772400015.764.8500015.769.4630015.673.9800015.772.61000015.767.51250015.756.61600015.753.1SPL68.730.785.7N22.21.562.6median 18median 67.5Delta4.39.935.240.932.939.937.234.931.740.339.639.128.334.127.332.326.928.726.731.5243920.946.220.948.319.555.718.562.917.565.817.569.615.769.215.87016.675.215.873.715.474.215.573.51671.615.873.11671.616.367.116.367.716.271.816.475.516.459.928.684.11.158.5median 16.4median 69.22.18.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi A3Xiaomi Mi 6X
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi A3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Mi 6X audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.8 / 2 / 3.3 Watt
Carga midlight 4.1 / 7.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi A3
4030 mAh
Honor 20 Lite
3400 mAh
Motorola Moto G7
3000 mAh
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
3400 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 6X
3010 mAh
Nokia 4.2
3000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-5%
1%
13%
14%
23%
0%
13%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
0.9
-13%
1.1
-38%
0.8
-0%
0.65
19%
0.74
7%
0.8
-0%
0.877 (0.2 - 3.4, n=769)
-10%
Idle Average *
2
1.6
20%
1.8
10%
1.2
40%
1.94
3%
1.9
5%
2
-0%
1.734 (0.6 - 6.2, n=768)
13%
Idle Maximum *
3.3
2.2
33%
2.6
21%
2.3
30%
1.97
40%
2.21
33%
3.3
-0%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=769)
39%
Load Average *
4.1
6
-46%
4.2
-2%
4.5
-10%
4.65
-13%
3.04
26%
4.1
-0%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=763)
1%
Load Maximum *
7.7
9.1
-18%
6.8
12%
7.3
5%
5.93
23%
4.15
46%
7.7
-0%
5.9 (1.2 - 14.2, n=763)
23%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
28h 44min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
16h 25min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 03min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 57min
Xiaomi Mi A3
4030 mAh
Honor 20 Lite
3400 mAh
Motorola Moto G7
3000 mAh
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
3400 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 6X
3010 mAh
Nokia 4.2
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-30%
-19%
-33%
-41%
-29%
Reader / Idle
1724
1548
-10%
1346
-22%
1046
-39%
H.264
1023
819
-20%
536
-48%
608
-41%
WiFi v1.3
985
685
-30%
798
-19%
523
-47%
495
-50%
696
-29%
Load
297
219
-26%
249
-16%
192
-35%

Pro

+ Tela AMOLED com boa reprodução de cores
+ Bom equipamento de câmera
+ Muito desempenho e recursos pelo dinheiro
+ Emissor de infravermelhos
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Bom alto-falantes
+ Android puro e atual
+ Carcaça robusta e moderna

Contra

- Conexões WLAN irregulares
- Quase nenhum aumento de desempenho em comparação com o Mi A2
- Alto consumo de energia em partes
- Qualidade de voz ligeiramente oca
- Tela escura de baixa resolução

Veredicto – Principalmente mais, mas, às vezes, menos

In review: Xiaomi Mi A3. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Xiaomi Mi A3. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de

A pergunta que fizemos no início de nosso teste não é tão fácil de responder: Comparado ao seu antecessor, o Mi A3 foi reduzido ou melhorado? Há sinais de ambos. Existem fatores como a menor resolução da tela, o desempenho 3D ligeiramente reduzido e o maior consumo de energia. Por outro lado, está o design mais moderno, a vida duração da bateria significativamente maior, o melhor equipamento da câmera e um alto-falante que foi novamente aprimorado.

O Mi A3 também sofre de uma WLAN intermitente, que a Xiaomi deve corrigir rapidamente com uma atualização, pois caso contrário, o smartphone é quase inutilizável na WLAN para aplicativos de comunicação como o Skype.

Em algumas áreas, o Xiaomi Mi A3 é melhor que o seu antecessor. Mas a Xiaomi deve corrigir rapidamente a WLAN intermitente com uma atualização.

Os concorrentes precisam fazer um esforço contínuo, já que por 200 Euros (~ US $ 221; ~ US $ 185 nos EUA), atualmente quase ninguém mais oferece tanto poder de computação, um monitor OLED, duração da bateria que dura uma eternidade e até um design moderno. Portanto, no final, os aspectos positivos contam mais para nós, mesmo que o Mi A2 ainda ofereça a melhor relação preço-desempenho em comparação com seu sucessor por 50 Euros a menos (~$55). 

Nota: O Xiaomi Mi A3 é um dos primeiros smartphones que avaliamos usando o novo Versão 7 do nosso sistema de avaliação. Como alguns critérios se tornaram mais rigorosos aqui e alguns limites de valor foram alterados para que dispositivos futuros não atinjam a escala, a classificação de acordo com a Versão 7 é mais baixa que a dos testes anteriores. Nas próximas semanas, vamos trazer os dispositivos mais importantes para a nova versão do nosso sistema de classificação, para que você possa continuar a compará-los facilmente.

Xiaomi Mi A3 - 09/27/2019 v7
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
77%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
94%
Conectividade
40 / 70 → 57%
Peso
90%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
80%
Desempenho do jogos
13 / 64 → 20%
Desempenho da aplicação
59 / 86 → 68%
Temperatura
87%
Ruído
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Camera
62%
Médio
72%
78%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi A3 – O rei do preço-desempenho novamente!
Florian Schmitt, 2019-09-11 (Update: 2019-09-16)