Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 6

Manuel Masiero (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 08/26/2017

Novidades desde a Finlândia. Com o Nokia 6, a Nokia coloca o seu atual modelo top de smartphone na corrida. O smartphone Android de 5,5 polegadas está mais bem equipado do que seus colegas de nível de entrada, o Nokia 3 e o Nokia 5 e, portanto, compete na gama média. Nosso teste mostra como ele se sai.

Nokia 6
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 505
Memória
3072 MB 
Pantalha
5.5 polegadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 403 PPI, Full HD, capacitiva, IPS, 2.5D, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, legibilidade melhorada sob a luz direta do sol, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 21.95 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio de 3,5, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 128 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de aceleração (G-sensor), sensor de luz, e-compass, sensor de digitais, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, USB-OTG
Funcionamento em rede
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM quadband (850, 900, 1.800, 1.900 MHz), UMTS quadband (850, 900, 1.900, 2.100 MHz), LTE Cat.4 (band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40), downloads up to 150 MBit/s, uploads up to 50 MBit/s, dual SIM (Nano-SIM), Dual SIM, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.4 x 154 x 75.8
Bateria
3000 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix PDAF, 1,0 µm, f/2, dual-tone flash
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix AF, 1,12 µm, f/2, 84-degree viewing area
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono, Teclado: virtual, Cabo USB, carregador modular, fones, instruções, ferramenta SIM, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
169 g, Suprimento de energia: 30 g
Preço
300 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Mali-T830 MP3, 7880, 32 GB eMMC Flash
214 MBit/s ∼100% +83%
Nokia 5
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
122 MBit/s ∼57% +4%
Lenovo Moto G5
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s ∼57% +3%
Nokia 6
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
117 MBit/s ∼55%
Wiko U Feel Prime
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.4 MBit/s ∼26% -53%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 16 GB eMMC Flash
54.5 MBit/s ∼25% -53%
LG K10 2017
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.2 MBit/s ∼22% -61%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Mali-T830 MP3, 7880, 32 GB eMMC Flash
167 MBit/s ∼100% +48%
Nokia 6
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
113 MBit/s ∼68%
Nokia 5
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
112 MBit/s ∼67% -1%
Lenovo Moto G5
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
110 MBit/s ∼66% -3%
LG K10 2017
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
54.6 MBit/s ∼33% -52%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53.9 MBit/s ∼32% -52%
Wiko U Feel Prime
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53.2 MBit/s ∼32% -53%
Nokia 6: overall route
Nokia 6: overall route
Nokia 6: forest
Nokia 6: forest
Nokia 6: bridge
Nokia 6: bridge
Garmin Edge 500: overall route
Garmin Edge 500: overall route
Garmin Edge 500: forest
Garmin Edge 500: forest
Garmin Edge 500: bridge
Garmin Edge 500: bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
511
cd/m²
511
cd/m²
490
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
512
cd/m²
488
cd/m²
502
cd/m²
512
cd/m²
483
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 512 cd/m² Médio: 501.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.07 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 512 cd/m²
Contraste: 1422:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.4 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 7.2 | - Ø
99.3% sRGB (Calman)
Gamma: 2.28
Nokia 6
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Huawei P8 lite 2017
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Lenovo Moto G5
IPS, 1920x1080, 5
LG K10 2017
IPS, 1280x720, 5.3
Nokia 5
IPS, 1280x720, 5.2
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2
Wiko U Feel Prime
IPS, 1920x1080, 5
Screen
4%
26%
-7%
-5%
40%
7%
Brightness
501
559
12%
625
25%
350
-30%
635
27%
542
8%
386
-23%
Brightness Distribution
94
91
-3%
92
-2%
85
-10%
90
-4%
93
-1%
86
-9%
Black Level *
0.36
0.39
-8%
0.29
19%
0.36
-0%
0.57
-58%
0.36
-0%
Contrast
1422
1474
4%
2276
60%
1067
-25%
1105
-22%
1142
-20%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.4
5.2
19%
4.9
23%
6
6%
5
22%
1.6
75%
4.3
33%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.2
7.2
-0%
4.8
33%
5.9
18%
6.9
4%
1.5
79%
2.8
61%
Gamma
2.28 105%
2.4 100%
2.18 110%
2 120%
2.37 101%
2.28 105%
2.53 95%
CCT
7904 82%
7224 90%
7357 88%
8042 81%
8736 74%
6422 101%
6589 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6272 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nokia 6
47066 Points ∼21%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
56798 Points ∼25% +21%
Lenovo Moto G5
44653 Points ∼20% -5%
LG K10 2017
39063 Points ∼17% -17%
Nokia 5
45274 Points ∼20% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
60603 Points ∼27% +29%
Wiko U Feel Prime
44420 Points ∼19% -6%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 6
3723 Points ∼55%
Lenovo Moto G5
3583 Points ∼52% -4%
LG K10 2017
3167 Points ∼46% -15%
Nokia 5
3807 Points ∼56% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
4060 Points ∼59% +9%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 6
4980 Points ∼60%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
4419 Points ∼53% -11%
Lenovo Moto G5
4730 Points ∼57% -5%
Nokia 5
5060 Points ∼61% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5035 Points ∼61% +1%
Wiko U Feel Prime
3347 Points ∼40% -33%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Nokia 6
10 Points ∼1%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
10 Points ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Moto G5
686 Points ∼44% +6760%
LG K10 2017
1137 Points ∼74% +11270%
Nokia 5
671 Points ∼44% +6610%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
659 Points ∼43% +6490%
Wiko U Feel Prime
10 Points ∼1% 0%
Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 6
731 Points ∼8%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
826 Points ∼10% +13%
Lenovo Moto G5
722 Points ∼8% -1%
LG K10 2017
508 Points ∼6% -31%
Nokia 5
740 Points ∼9% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1528 Points ∼18% +109%
Wiko U Feel Prime
740 Points ∼9% +1%
Memory (sort by value)
Nokia 6
587 Points ∼13%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
1658 Points ∼37% +182%
Lenovo Moto G5
538 Points ∼12% -8%
LG K10 2017
623 Points ∼14% +6%
Nokia 5
788 Points ∼18% +34%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1508 Points ∼34% +157%
Wiko U Feel Prime
774 Points ∼17% +32%
System (sort by value)
Nokia 6
2135 Points ∼32%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
2694 Points ∼41% +26%
Lenovo Moto G5
1656 Points ∼25% -22%
LG K10 2017
1259 Points ∼19% -41%
Nokia 5
2154 Points ∼33% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
2593 Points ∼39% +21%
Wiko U Feel Prime
1281 Points ∼19% -40%
Overall (sort by value)
Nokia 6
307 Points ∼8%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
435 Points ∼11% +42%
Lenovo Moto G5
815 Points ∼22% +165%
LG K10 2017
821 Points ∼22% +167%
Nokia 5
958 Points ∼25% +212%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1408 Points ∼37% +359%
Wiko U Feel Prime
290 Points ∼8% -6%
Geekbench 4.1
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G5
1731 Points ∼20%
LG K10 2017
1480 Points ∼17%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 6
2844 Points ∼15%
Lenovo Moto G5
2563 Points ∼14% -10%
LG K10 2017
2311 Points ∼13% -19%
Nokia 5
2849 Points ∼15% 0%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 6
667 Points ∼14%
Lenovo Moto G5
619 Points ∼13% -7%
LG K10 2017
593 Points ∼12% -11%
Nokia 5
671 Points ∼14% +1%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 6
1225 Points ∼40%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
1532 Points ∼51% +25%
Lenovo Moto G5
1245 Points ∼41% +2%
LG K10 2017
1047 Points ∼35% -15%
Nokia 5
1227 Points ∼41% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1713 Points ∼57% +40%
Wiko U Feel Prime
1034 Points ∼34% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 6
243 Points ∼5%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
321 Points ∼6% +32%
Lenovo Moto G5
243 Points ∼5% 0%
LG K10 2017
252 Points ∼5% +4%
Nokia 5
245 Points ∼5% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
710 Points ∼13% +192%
Wiko U Feel Prime
250 Points ∼5% +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Nokia 6
296 Points ∼8%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
389 Points ∼10% +31%
Lenovo Moto G5
296 Points ∼8% 0%
LG K10 2017
303 Points ∼8% +2%
Nokia 5
298 Points ∼8% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
816 Points ∼21% +176%
Wiko U Feel Prime
301 Points ∼8% +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 6
1238 Points ∼41%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
1547 Points ∼51% +25%
Lenovo Moto G5
1243 Points ∼41% 0%
LG K10 2017
1105 Points ∼37% -11%
Nokia 5
1268 Points ∼42% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1752 Points ∼58% +42%
Wiko U Feel Prime
1118 Points ∼37% -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 6
495 Points ∼6%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
516 Points ∼7% +4%
Lenovo Moto G5
496 Points ∼6% 0%
LG K10 2017
380 Points ∼5% -23%
Nokia 5
503 Points ∼7% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1053 Points ∼14% +113%
Wiko U Feel Prime
514 Points ∼7% +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia 6
571 Points ∼11%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
606 Points ∼12% +6%
Lenovo Moto G5
572 Points ∼11% 0%
LG K10 2017
445 Points ∼9% -22%
Nokia 5
581 Points ∼12% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1155 Points ∼23% +102%
Wiko U Feel Prime
584 Points ∼12% +2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 6
8973 Points ∼12%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
13590 Points ∼19% +51%
Lenovo Moto G5
9089 Points ∼13% +1%
LG K10 2017
8223 Points ∼11% -8%
Nokia 5
9023 Points ∼13% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13057 Points ∼18% +46%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Nokia 6
9605 Points ∼2%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
11147 Points ∼2% +16%
Lenovo Moto G5
9617 Points ∼2% 0%
LG K10 2017
7936 Points ∼2% -17%
Nokia 5
9684 Points ∼2% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13314 Points ∼3% +39%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nokia 6
9457 Points ∼5%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
11611 Points ∼6% +23%
Lenovo Moto G5
9494 Points ∼5% 0%
LG K10 2017
7998 Points ∼4% -15%
Nokia 5
9529 Points ∼5% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13256 Points ∼7% +40%
Wiko U Feel Prime
9548 Points ∼5% +1%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Nokia 6
16 fps ∼1%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
18 fps ∼1% +13%
Lenovo Moto G5
16 fps ∼1% 0%
LG K10 2017
13 fps ∼1% -19%
Nokia 5
17 fps ∼1% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
34 fps ∼3% +113%
Wiko U Feel Prime
17 fps ∼1% +6%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Nokia 6
16 fps ∼3%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
19 fps ∼4% +19%
Lenovo Moto G5
14 fps ∼3% -12%
LG K10 2017
22 fps ∼5% +38%
Nokia 5
27 fps ∼6% +69%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
33 fps ∼7% +106%
Wiko U Feel Prime
16 fps ∼3% 0%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 6
7.1 fps ∼1%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
7.9 fps ∼1% +11%
Lenovo Moto G5
7.1 fps ∼1% 0%
LG K10 2017
5.3 fps ∼1% -25%
Nokia 5
7.2 fps ∼1% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
15 fps ∼3% +111%
Wiko U Feel Prime
7.1 fps ∼1% 0%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 6
7 fps ∼2%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
8.5 fps ∼2% +21%
Lenovo Moto G5
7.4 fps ∼2% +6%
LG K10 2017
11 fps ∼3% +57%
Nokia 5
14 fps ∼4% +100%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
15 fps ∼4% +114%
Wiko U Feel Prime
7.5 fps ∼2% +7%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 6
4.6 fps ∼1%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
4.6 fps ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Moto G5
4.6 fps ∼1% 0%
LG K10 2017
3.5 fps ∼1% -24%
Nokia 5
4.6 fps ∼1% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
9.1 fps ∼2% +98%
Wiko U Feel Prime
4.4 fps ∼1% -4%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 6
4.5 fps ∼3%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
5 fps ∼3% +11%
Lenovo Moto G5
5 fps ∼3% +11%
LG K10 2017
8.6 fps ∼5% +91%
Nokia 5
10 fps ∼6% +122%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
9 fps ∼5% +100%
Wiko U Feel Prime
4.8 fps ∼3% +7%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 6
2.5 fps ∼1%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
2.8 fps ∼1% +12%
Lenovo Moto G5
2.5 fps ∼1% 0%
LG K10 2017
1.9 fps ∼1% -24%
Nokia 5
2.5 fps ∼1% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5.2 fps ∼1% +108%
Wiko U Feel Prime
2.5 fps ∼1% 0%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 6
2.5 fps ∼0%
Huawei P8 lite 2017
3 fps ∼0% +20%
Lenovo Moto G5
2.7 fps ∼0% +8%
LG K10 2017
4.3 fps ∼0% +72%
Nokia 5
5.2 fps ∼0% +108%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5.2 fps ∼0% +108%
Wiko U Feel Prime
2.7 fps ∼0% +8%

Legend

 
Nokia 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P8 lite 2017 HiSilicon Kirin 655, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto G5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG K10 2017 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 Samsung Exynos 7880, ARM Mali-T830 MP3, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Wiko U Feel Prime Qualcomm Snapdragon 430, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
32.222 Points ∼100% +84%
Huawei P8 lite 2017 (Chrome 55)
29.499 Points ∼92% +68%
Nokia 5 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
21.48 Points ∼67% +22%
Wiko U Feel Prime (Chrome 55)
21.4 Points ∼66% +22%
LG K10 2017 (Chrome 57)
20.838 Points ∼65% +19%
Lenovo Moto G5 (Chrome 57)
20.36 Points ∼63% +16%
Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
17.558 Points ∼54%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
5256 Points ∼100% +81%
Huawei P8 lite 2017 (Chrome 55)
4630 Points ∼88% +60%
LG K10 2017 (Chrome 57)
3407 Points ∼65% +18%
Wiko U Feel Prime (Chrome 55)
3383 Points ∼64% +17%
Nokia 5 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
3138 Points ∼60% +8%
Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
2899 Points ∼55%
Lenovo Moto G5 (Chrome 57)
2604 Points ∼50% -10%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
12062.3 ms * ∼100%
LG K10 2017 (Chrome 57)
11708.2 ms * ∼97% +3%
Lenovo Moto G5 (Chrome 57)
11358 ms * ∼94% +6%
Wiko U Feel Prime (Chrome 55)
10826 ms * ∼90% +10%
Nokia 5 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
10396 ms * ∼86% +14%
Huawei P8 lite 2017 (Chrome 55)
8768.2 ms * ∼73% +27%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
6442.4 ms * ∼53% +47%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
89 Points ∼100% +48%
Huawei P8 lite 2017 (Chrome 55)
62 Points ∼70% +3%
Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
60 Points ∼67%
Lenovo Moto G5 (Chrome 57)
57 Points ∼64% -5%
Nokia 5 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)
57 Points ∼64% -5%
LG K10 2017 (Chrome 57)
34 Points ∼38% -43%

* ... smaller is better

Nokia 6Huawei P8 lite 2017Lenovo Moto G5LG K10 2017Nokia 5Samsung Galaxy A5 2017Wiko U Feel Prime
AndroBench 3-5
-30%
31%
-14%
-1%
-12%
6%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
56.6
32.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-43%
57.98 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
2%
61.63 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
9%
62
10%
55.98 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-1%
35.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-38%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.6
53.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-37%
78.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-7%
77.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-9%
83.9
-1%
73.71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-13%
41.98 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-50%
Random Write 4KB
11.34
8
-29%
37.9
234%
10.8
-5%
8.39
-26%
12.13
7%
9.4
-17%
Random Read 4KB
33.8
38.7
14%
37.6
11%
25.1
-26%
40.54
20%
22.41
-34%
55
63%
Sequential Write 256KB
77.06
42
-45%
45.6
-41%
43.6
-43%
74.86
-3%
77.1
0%
137.3
78%
Sequential Read 256KB
273.06
165.8
-39%
230.6
-16%
246.1
-10%
255.56
-6%
182.03
-33%
270.9
-1%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high24 fps
 very low30 fps
comparado com
Lenovo Moto E3 (min)
 MT6735P, Mali-T720
11
   ...
BlackBerry Priv
 808 MSM8992, Adreno 418
24
Huawei Y6 II Compact
 MT6735, Mali-T720 MP2
24
Nokia 6
 430, Adreno 505
24
Huawei Y6 2017
 MT6737T, Mali-T720 MP2
24
LG Q6
 435, Adreno 505
25
   ...
HTC 10 (max)
 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
48
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high50 fps
Carga Máxima
 35.5 °C35 °C35.6 °C 
 36 °C35.3 °C39.8 °C 
 35.8 °C35.6 °C36 °C 
Máximo: 39.8 °C
Médio: 36.1 °C
35.8 °C37 °C38.4 °C
36.3 °C37 °C37.2 °C
36.8 °C37.7 °C37.9 °C
Máximo: 38.4 °C
Médio: 37.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  42.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.529.430.5253130313134.829.834.84037.93337.9503226.5326330.826.230.88033.630.933.610031.832.431.812538.232.638.216040.621.940.620050.421.250.425056.720.856.731561.619.261.640063.520.863.550067.421.667.463067.518.767.580067.217.967.2100065.417.665.4125063.817.263.816006416.464200069.516.769.5250069.116.469.1315066.516.166.5400064.515.964.5500064.81664.8630063.11663.180006216.1621000062.215.962.21250057.915.957.91600050.21650.2SPL7829.678N431.343median 63.5Nokia 6median 17.2median 63.5Delta6.42.66.429.131.129.129.330.129.329.929.929.938.634.438.628.234.628.226.829.326.828.632.228.630.234.130.238.836.938.843.923.843.951.521.551.555.620.955.65921.35961.419.761.463.520.163.563.918.563.967.519.367.570.417.870.471.217.471.272.916.472.972.816.472.872.416.672.475.416.175.474.816.174.870.716.170.768.11668.167.316.167.36616.16658.81658.849.21649.283.630.183.655.71.455.7median 66Nokia 5median 17.4median 668.73.78.73629.93642.228.342.238.229.238.231.730.331.731.229.731.227.925.827.931.823.531.827.72427.731.125.131.126.121.826.132.221.732.237.324.737.34524.14551.521.851.557.922.457.963.219.863.26518.56565.318.465.367.11967.168.717.268.768.316.168.369.51669.570.916.470.97515.87577.214.677.272.514.672.572.914.772.974.514.974.569.414.769.455.514.755.583.629.883.653.11.353.1median 65.3Huawei P8 lite 2017median 18.4median 65.312.93.212.9hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Nokia 6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Nokia 5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Huawei P8 lite 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.17 / 0.21 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.63 / 1.75 / 1.87 Watt
Carga midlight 3.56 / 5.85 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Nokia 6
3000 mAh
Huawei P8 lite 2017
3000 mAh
Lenovo Moto G5
2800 mAh
LG K10 2017
2800 mAh
Nokia 5
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
3000 mAh
Wiko U Feel Prime
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
-49%
-0%
8%
7%
22%
8%
Idle Minimum *
0.63
1.44
-129%
0.73
-16%
0.76
-21%
0.52
17%
0.64
-2%
0.66
-5%
Idle Average *
1.75
2.47
-41%
1.64
6%
1.59
9%
1.78
-2%
1.36
22%
1.66
5%
Idle Maximum *
1.87
2.58
-38%
1.68
10%
1.61
14%
1.96
-5%
1.4
25%
1.76
6%
Load Average *
3.56
4.55
-28%
3.46
3%
3.24
9%
3.23
9%
2.53
29%
2.85
20%
Load Maximum *
5.85
6.3
-8%
6.13
-5%
4.15
29%
4.88
17%
3.63
38%
5.01
14%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
28h 15min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
11h 10min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 02min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 48min
Nokia 6
3000 mAh
Huawei P8 lite 2017
3000 mAh
Lenovo Moto G5
2800 mAh
LG K10 2017
2800 mAh
Nokia 5
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
3000 mAh
Wiko U Feel Prime
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
3%
-10%
3%
25%
64%
-20%
Reader / Idle
1695
1326
-22%
1243
-27%
1477
-13%
1772
5%
2418
43%
1254
-26%
H.264
542
644
19%
616
14%
613
13%
790
46%
984
82%
WiFi v1.3
670
604
-10%
561
-16%
532
-21%
713
6%
843
26%
575
-14%
Load
228
283
24%
207
-9%
298
31%
323
42%
467
105%

Pro

+ Carcaça de alta qualidade
+ Muitas bandas LTE
+ Slot dual-SIM
+ Android 7.1
+ Sensor de digitais
+ Boa câmera de 16 MP
+ Tela Full HD brilhante
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Baixa temperatura

Contra

- Sem conexão USB Type-C
- Velocidade de USB-2.0 apenas
- A tela tem uma tonalidade azul
- Nem todos os jogos rodam fluentemente
In the test: Nokia 6. Test unit provided by cyberport.
In the test: Nokia 6. Test unit provided by cyberport.

O modelo mais caro do novo trio de smartphones da Nokia se distingue do Nokia 3 e do Nokia 5 com o seu formato maior e tela Full HD de 5,5 polegadas. A memória de trabalho e o armazenamento interno também receberam uma atualização, sendo mais generosos, com 3 GB e 32 GB, respectivamente. As vantagens do Nokia 6 também incluem muitos recursos que já gostamos no Nokia 5: muitas bandas LTE, um slot dual-SIM, um sensor de digitais, Android 7.1 quase em seu estado original, uma longa duração da bateria e um excelente acabamento. Com sua câmera de 16 MP, o Nokia 6 tira fotos ligeiramente melhores do que o Nokia 5, mas no final a diferença é bastante pequena.

O Nokia 6 é um bom smartphone, mas não oferece muito valor adicional em comparação com o Nokia 5, mais acessível. Existe apenas um argumento para sua compra: a tela maior e de maior resolução.

"Marginalmente" também é a palavra-chave na nossa lista de reclamações. Se você ignorar a tela, o Nokia 6 não pode se diferenciar significativamente do Nokia 5, mais acessível. Dado que o mesmo SoC Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 está no interior, ambos os smartphones têm mais ou menos a mesma velocidade. Embora isso seja suficiente para nadar entre a gama média, um processador mais rápido teria beneficiado o Nokia 6. Em particular durante os jogos, teríamos gostado disso, dado que aqui o Snapdragon 430 tem visivelmente mais problemas para preencher a tela Full HD com conteúdo do que no Nokia 5. Também sentimos falta de uma conexão USB Type-C. O exemplo do Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) mostra que isto também é possível nesta faixa de preços.

 

 

Nokia 6 - 08/17/2017 v6
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
85%
Teclado
66 / 75 → 88%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
37 / 60 → 62%
Peso
91%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
19 / 63 → 30%
Desempenho da aplicação
36 / 70 → 52%
Temperatura
89%
Ruído
100%
Audio
60 / 91 → 66%
Camera
80%
Médio
72%
82%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Nokia 6
Manuel Masiero, 2017-08-26 (Update: 2017-09- 5)