Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone HTC U11 Life

Florian Wimmer (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 01/18/2018

Atualizações garantidas. Se não fosse para os lados sensíveis ao toque e o Android One, que garante atualizações do sistema operacional por dois anos, o HTC U11 Life seria um dispositivo de gama média, como muitos outros. Isso faz dele um smartphone muito especial?

HTC U11 Life (U Serie)
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 508
Memória
3072 MB 
Pantalha
5.2 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 424 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, SLCD, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 22 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Saída de áudio via USB-C, Card Reader: microSD de até 2 TB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de aceleração, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, USB-C
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1700/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B20/​B28/​/​B38/​B40/​B66), LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.1 x 149.1 x 72.9
Bateria
9.88 Wh, 2600 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix f/​2.0, phase-comparison AF, flash LED, vídeos @2160p/​30fps
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/​2.0, vídeos @1080p/​30fps
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono na borda inferior, Teclado: teclado virtual, carregador, cabo USB, fones U-Sonic, ferramenta SIM, Android One, 24 Meses Garantia, Largura de banda (download/upload): 600 Mbps/​75 Mbps (LTE); SAR value: 0.283 W/​kg (head), 0.932 W/​kg (body); IP67 certified, Qualcomm Quick Charge 3.0, pressure-sensitive frame, fanless
peso
142 g, Suprimento de energia: 79 g
Preço
349 Euros (~$426) Euro

 

HTC U11 Life
HTC U11 Life
HTC U11 Life
HTC U11 Life
HTC U11 Life
HTC U11 Life
HTC U11 Life
HTC U11 Life

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 5s
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
312 MBit/s ∼100% +39%
Honor 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
283 MBit/s ∼91% +26%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
242 MBit/s ∼78% +8%
HTC U11 Life
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
224 MBit/s ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Mali-T830 MP3, 7880, 32 GB eMMC Flash
214 MBit/s ∼69% -4%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HTC U11 Life
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
274 MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
271 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Mali-T830 MP3, 7880, 32 GB eMMC Flash
167 MBit/s ∼61% -39%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
148 MBit/s ∼54% -46%
Honor 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
140 MBit/s ∼51% -49%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – path
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – path
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – loop
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – loop
GPS HTC U11 Life – overview
GPS HTC U11 Life – overview
GPS HTC U11 Life – path
GPS HTC U11 Life – path
GPS HTC U11 Life – loop
GPS HTC U11 Life – loop

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
524
cd/m²
536
cd/m²
514
cd/m²
529
cd/m²
545
cd/m²
483
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
556
cd/m²
514
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 556 cd/m² Médio: 526 cd/m² Minimum: 6.59 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 545 cd/m²
Contraste: 1298:1 (Preto: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.9 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 5.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
Gamma: 2.31
HTC U11 Life
SLCD, 1920x1080, 5.2
Honor 9
IPS/LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.15
BQ Aquaris X Pro
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Xiaomi Mi 5s
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.15
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2
Screen
15%
-36%
1%
36%
Brightness middle
545
550
1%
458
-16%
627
15%
539
-1%
Brightness
526
535
2%
473
-10%
596
13%
542
3%
Brightness Distribution
87
92
6%
88
1%
91
5%
93
7%
Black Level *
0.42
0.42
-0%
0.51
-21%
0.6
-43%
Contrast
1298
1310
1%
898
-31%
1045
-19%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.9
3.3
33%
7.1
-45%
4.5
8%
1.6
67%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.5
4.5
47%
14.5
-71%
7.5
12%
2.6
69%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.4
3.6
33%
10.5
-94%
4.5
17%
1.5
72%
Gamma
2.31 104%
2.38 101%
2.28 105%
2.26 106%
2.28 105%
CCT
7610 85%
7226 90%
8951 73%
7427 88%
6422 101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10727 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.6 ms rise
↘ 14.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
54.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 27.6 ms rise
↘ 26.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41.6 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC U11 Life
73617 Points ∼32%
Honor 9
150276 Points ∼65% +104%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
66226 Points ∼29% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
148698 Points ∼65% +102%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
60603 Points ∼26% -18%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
68282 Points ∼30% -7%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
HTC U11 Life
4835 Points ∼47%
Honor 9
6113 Points ∼59% +26%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4915 Points ∼48% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
4060 Points ∼39% -16%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5085 Points ∼49% +5%
Work performance score (sort by value)
HTC U11 Life
5818 Points ∼57%
Honor 9
7034 Points ∼69% +21%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
5886 Points ∼57% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
5121 Points ∼50% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5035 Points ∼49% -13%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
6264 Points ∼61% +8%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
HTC U11 Life
858 Points ∼51%
Honor 9
1069 Points ∼63% +25%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
806 Points ∼48% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
1020 Points ∼60% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
659 Points ∼39% -23%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
766 Points ∼45% -11%
Graphics (sort by value)
HTC U11 Life
1515 Points ∼16%
Honor 9
4126 Points ∼45% +172%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1012 Points ∼11% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
5033 Points ∼54% +232%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1528 Points ∼17% +1%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1496 Points ∼16% -1%
Memory (sort by value)
HTC U11 Life
838 Points ∼19%
Honor 9
3258 Points ∼74% +289%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1046 Points ∼24% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
1740 Points ∼39% +108%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1508 Points ∼34% +80%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1380 Points ∼31% +65%
System (sort by value)
HTC U11 Life
3215 Points ∼31%
Honor 9
4154 Points ∼40% +29%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3492 Points ∼34% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
3387 Points ∼33% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
2593 Points ∼25% -19%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3319 Points ∼32% +3%
Overall (sort by value)
HTC U11 Life
1368 Points ∼32%
Honor 9
2779 Points ∼65% +103%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1314 Points ∼31% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
2345 Points ∼54% +71%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1408 Points ∼33% +3%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1513 Points ∼35% +11%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
HTC U11 Life
3956 Points ∼28%
Honor 9
Points ∼0% -100%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3942 Points ∼27% 0%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC U11 Life
4193 Points ∼15%
Honor 9
6527 Points ∼23% +56%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4369 Points ∼15% +4%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
4172 Points ∼14% -1%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC U11 Life
877 Points ∼15%
Honor 9
1869 Points ∼31% +113%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
928 Points ∼16% +6%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
865 Points ∼15% -1%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
HTC U11 Life
1779 Points ∼48%
Honor 9
2287 Points ∼62% +29%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2132 Points ∼58% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
1857 Points ∼51% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1713 Points ∼47% -4%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1751 Points ∼48% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
HTC U11 Life
729 Points ∼14%
Honor 9
2798 Points ∼52% +284%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
379 Points ∼7% -48%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
2933 Points ∼54% +302%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
710 Points ∼13% -3%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
726 Points ∼13% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
HTC U11 Life
839 Points ∼18%
Honor 9
2666 Points ∼56% +218%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
464 Points ∼10% -45%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
2598 Points ∼55% +210%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
816 Points ∼17% -3%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
835 Points ∼18% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
HTC U11 Life
1711 Points ∼47%
Honor 9
1809 Points ∼50% +6%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2127 Points ∼58% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
1927 Points ∼53% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1752 Points ∼48% +2%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1785 Points ∼49% +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
HTC U11 Life
1257 Points ∼15%
Honor 9
2990 Points ∼36% +138%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
725 Points ∼9% -42%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
4746 Points ∼58% +278%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1053 Points ∼13% -16%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1289 Points ∼16% +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
HTC U11 Life
1336 Points ∼21%
Honor 9
2611 Points ∼41% +95%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
849 Points ∼13% -36%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
3580 Points ∼56% +168%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
1155 Points ∼18% -14%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1374 Points ∼22% +3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
HTC U11 Life
12919 Points ∼16%
Honor 9
15150 Points ∼19% +17%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
17044 Points ∼22% +32%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
22372 Points ∼28% +73%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13057 Points ∼17% +1%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
13014 Points ∼16% +1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
HTC U11 Life
18469 Points ∼4%
Honor 9
38979 Points ∼8% +111%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13277 Points ∼3% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
34202 Points ∼7% +85%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13314 Points ∼3% -28%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
18386 Points ∼4% 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
HTC U11 Life
16859 Points ∼8%
Honor 9
28883 Points ∼14% +71%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13963 Points ∼7% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
30606 Points ∼15% +82%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
13256 Points ∼6% -21%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
16841 Points ∼8% 0%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
HTC U11 Life
30 fps ∼2%
Honor 9
60 fps ∼3% +100%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
23 fps ∼1% -23%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
93 fps ∼5% +210%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
34 fps ∼2% +13%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
30 fps ∼2% 0%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
HTC U11 Life
29 fps ∼6%
Honor 9
55 fps ∼12% +90%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
22 fps ∼5% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
60 fps ∼13% +107%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
33 fps ∼7% +14%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
29 fps ∼6% 0%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
HTC U11 Life
14 fps ∼3%
Honor 9
30 fps ∼5% +114%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.8 fps ∼2% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
49 fps ∼9% +250%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
15 fps ∼3% +7%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
14 fps ∼3% 0%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
HTC U11 Life
14 fps ∼4%
Honor 9
28 fps ∼8% +100%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.6 fps ∼3% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
48 fps ∼13% +243%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
15 fps ∼4% +7%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
14 fps ∼4% 0%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC U11 Life
9.7 fps ∼2%
Honor 9
22 fps ∼4% +127%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.4 fps ∼1% -34%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
32 fps ∼6% +230%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
9.1 fps ∼2% -6%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.7 fps ∼2% 0%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
HTC U11 Life
9.8 fps ∼6%
Honor 9
22 fps ∼13% +124%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.3 fps ∼4% -36%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
32 fps ∼18% +227%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
9 fps ∼5% -8%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.5 fps ∼5% -3%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC U11 Life
5.5 fps ∼1%
Honor 9
15 fps ∼4% +173%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼1% -36%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
19 fps ∼5% +245%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5.2 fps ∼1% -5%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5.3 fps ∼1% -4%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
HTC U11 Life
5.4 fps ∼5%
Honor 9
16 fps ∼14% +196%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼3% -35%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
19 fps ∼16% +252%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
5.2 fps ∼4% -4%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5.3 fps ∼5% -2%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.81 fps ∼25%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
258 Points ∼14%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
190 Points ∼10%

Legend

 
HTC U11 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris X Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi 5s Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 Samsung Exynos 7880, ARM Mali-T830 MP3, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
58.6 Points ∼100% +102%
Xiaomi Mi 5s (Chrome 55)
57 Points ∼97% +97%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
32.222 Points ∼55% +11%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
28.993 Points ∼49%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
28.09 Points ∼48% -3%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
26.837 Points ∼46% -7%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
10208 Points ∼100% +109%
Xiaomi Mi 5s (Chrome 55)
9378 Points ∼92% +92%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
5256 Points ∼51% +7%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
4893 Points ∼48%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
4424 Points ∼43% -10%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
4398 Points ∼43% -10%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
9493 ms * ∼100%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
9425 ms * ∼99% +1%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
8741.5 ms * ∼92% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
6442.4 ms * ∼68% +32%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
3149 ms * ∼33% +67%
Xiaomi Mi 5s (Chrome 55)
2580.2 ms * ∼27% +73%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
107 Points ∼100% +7%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
100 Points ∼93%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
95 Points ∼89% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44))
89 Points ∼83% -11%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
86 Points ∼80% -14%

* ... smaller is better

HTC U11 LifeHonor 9BQ Aquaris X ProXiaomi Mi 5sSamsung Galaxy A5 2017Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
AndroBench 3-5
4%
-14%
42%
-34%
14%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
59.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
34.64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-42%
49.77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-17%
55.98 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-6%
66.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
11%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82.75 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.99 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-18%
78.69 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-5%
73.71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-11%
86.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
Random Write 4KB
50.2
32.7
-35%
12.07
-76%
15.08
-70%
12.13
-76%
7.59
-85%
Random Read 4KB
39.3
55.7
42%
37.97
-3%
100.35
155%
22.41
-43%
68.57
74%
Sequential Write 256KB
120
204
70%
139.63
16%
153.47
28%
77.1
-36%
205.27
71%
Sequential Read 256KB
268
293
9%
270.46
1%
412.7
54%
182.03
-32%
287.38
7%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high28 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
Carga Máxima
 33.3 °C33.4 °C35 °C 
 33.4 °C33.1 °C35.5 °C 
 32.1 °C32.7 °C32.9 °C 
Máximo: 35.5 °C
Médio: 33.5 °C
27.9 °C29.7 °C31.2 °C
28.6 °C29.5 °C30.9 °C
27.4 °C29.2 °C29.2 °C
Máximo: 31.2 °C
Médio: 29.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  23.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
The maximum temp on the upper side is 35.5 °C, compared to the average of 35.9 °C ranging from 21.1 °C to 71 °C for class Smartphone.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.245.12532.941.13137.238.94031.736.65039.642.76328.3348027.33010026.930.212526.736.31602441.720020.946.525020.950.631519.551.740018.557.550017.556.963017.556.680015.760.9100015.870.3125016.675.7160015.878.5200015.479.6250015.581.231501679.4400015.87850001674.4630016.377.3800016.381.31000016.283.81250016.468.31600016.455.3SPL28.690.2N1.176median 16.4HTC U11 Lifemedian 68.3Delta2.113.431.641.125.44025.336.732.93633.635.631.630.628.432.92733.820.841.72244.421.348.420.850.521.256.619.462.519.566.217.766.117.974.217.877.317.374.317.473.816.771.817.269.318.269.517.966.517.661.417.755.817.854.517.959.918.152.218.249.530831.350.1median 17.9Samsung Galaxy A5 2017median 61.41.39.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
HTC U11 Life audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.96 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.03 / 0.13 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.63 / 2.1 / 2.15 Watt
Carga midlight 3.34 / 4.83 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HTC U11 Life
2600 mAh
Honor 9
3200 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 5s
3200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
-41%
-6%
-18%
23%
Idle Minimum *
0.63
1.13
-79%
0.67
-6%
0.4
37%
0.64
-2%
Idle Average *
2.1
2.25
-7%
1.7
19%
1.7
19%
1.36
35%
Idle Maximum *
2.15
2.3
-7%
1.78
17%
1.81
16%
1.4
35%
Load Average *
3.34
4.89
-46%
4.42
-32%
5.84
-75%
2.53
24%
Load Maximum *
4.83
7.99
-65%
6.3
-30%
9.12
-89%
3.63
25%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
30h 20min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 18min
Carga (máximo brilho)
5h 03min
HTC U11 Life
2600 mAh
Honor 9
3200 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 5s
3200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-22%
-8%
-9%
32%
Reader / Idle
1820
1399
-23%
1840
1%
2418
33%
H.264
798
564
-29%
644
-19%
984
23%
WiFi v1.3
725
516
-29%
730
1%
663
-9%
843
16%
Load
303
278
-8%
254
-16%
467
54%

Pro

+ Atualizações de software garantidas
+ Ótimos fones incluídos
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Consumo de energia limitado
+ Dificilmente esquenta
+ Áudio Hi-Res certificado
+ Proteção IP67
+ Sistema operacional limpo
+ NFC e Bluetooth 5.0
+ Muitas bandas LTE
+ Internet móvel veloz

Contra

- Edge Sense ativado acidentalmente
- Susceptível à poeira e impressões digitais
- GPS bastante lento
- Alto-falante muito limitado
- Saída de áudio somente via USB-C
- A tela tem uma tonalidade azul
Testing the HTC U11 Life. Test unit provided by HTC Germany.
Testing the HTC U11 Life. Test unit provided by HTC Germany.

Ainda há algumas coisas sobre o HTC U11 Life que destacam o smartphone entre os dispositivos de comparação. Uma e outra vez, precisamos destacar o espírito inventivo da HTC e a vontade absoluta de inovação, cujo resultado atual agora também é introduzido na gama média com USonic e Edge Sense. Graças à filosofia do Android-One, você tem garantidas atualizações por vários anos, o que fornece uma boa sensação particularmente em tempos em que brechas de segurança são descobertas semanalmente. Você também não espera necessariamente os excelentes fones de ouvido incluídos no pacote de um aparelho por 349 Euros (~$426). No entanto, você também não espera um alto-falante com som tão diminuto nesta faixa de preços, particularmente não da HTC.

Em muitas outras áreas, o desempenho do HTC U11 Life é sólido: uma boa duração da bateria, uma tela decente e um desempenho adequado para um dispositivo de gama média. A carcaça é elegante, mas bastante média em termos de qualidade, e além das novas opções de operação, o Edge Sense também cria alguns problemas novos, como a ativação inadvertida. A câmera também oferece um bom desempenho, mas não se destaca em comparação com outros smartphones.

Atualizações de segurança garantidas regularmente - este é um argumento forte para o HTC U11 Life. Um ótimo par de fones de ouvido incluídos e uma boa duração da bateria são outros argumentos. Mas também há desvantagens com um alto-falante ruim, falta de porta de áudio e uma navegação não muito precisa.

Em suma, o HTC U11 Life é um dispositivo que você deve testar  com suas próprias mãos. Como comprador, você deve perguntar a si mesmo, quanto gosto da carcaça, como posso lidar com o Edge Sense e posso viver com o alto-falante medíocre? Está bem para mim que não haja uma porta de áudio dedicada? Usar o smartphone para navegação também não deve ser muito importante para você. Apesar de todas essas preocupações, o HTC U11 Life ainda pode convencê-lo quando estiver em suas mãos, especialmente se as atualizações de segurança regulares forem importantes para você.

HTC U11 Life - 01/11/2018 v6
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
87%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
88%
Conectividade
42 / 60 → 71%
Peso
93%
Bateria
95%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
41 / 63 → 66%
Desempenho da aplicação
52 / 70 → 74%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
100%
Audio
39 / 91 → 43%
Camera
74%
Médio
73%
85%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone HTC U11 Life
Florian Wimmer, 2018-01-18 (Update: 2018-02- 1)