snhb.queue.push(function(){ snhb.addAdditionalAdSlotsToRefresh(additionalAdSlots); }); googletag.enableServices(); }); nbc_pagecall();
Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone OnePlus 7T Pro – o carregador mais rápido

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 11/06/2019

Mate por fora, brilhante por dentro. Embora a OnePlus tenha se focado no OnePlus 7T: O OnePlus 7T Pro mais uma vez acabou por ser um smartphone muito bom. Seu preço, no entanto, está subindo lentamente para igualar seus concorrentes. Isso faz com que perca seu apelo? Descubra em nossa análise.

OnePlus 7T Pro (7 Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 640
Memória
8192 MB 
Pantalha
6.67 polegadas 19.5:9, 3120 x 1440 pixel 515 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, , 228 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: Saída de áudio via USB-c, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8/​B9/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B29/​B32/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.8 x 162.6 x 75.9
Bateria
4085 mAh Lítio-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/​1.6, phase detection auto focus, laser auto focus, contrast auto focus, OIS, Dual-LED flash, videos @2160p/​60fps videos @720p/​480fps (camera 1); 16.0MP, f/​2.2, wide-angle lens (camera 2); 8.0MP, f/​2.4, telephoto lens (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/​2.0, videos @1080p/​30fps, extensível
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Adaptador de CA de carga rápida, cabo USB, capa, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, LTE 4×4 MIMO DL Cat18 /UL Cat13 (1.2 Gbps /150 Mbps); SAR value: 1.120 W/kg (body), fanless
Released
10/10/2019
peso
206 g, Suprimento de energia: 128 g
Preço
759 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison Devices

RatingDateModelWeightDriveSizeResolutionBest Price
87%11/2019OnePlus 7T Pro
855+, Adreno 640
206 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"3120x1440
87%02/2019Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
9820, Mali-G76 MP12
198 g512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.4"3040x1440
86%05/2019OnePlus 7 Pro
855, Adreno 640
206 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"3120x1440
89%08/2019Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
855, Adreno 640
191 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.39"2340x1080
87%09/2019Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
226 g64 GB SSD6.5"2688x1242
86%10/2019OnePlus 7T
855+, Adreno 640
190 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.55"2400x1080
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T

Size Comparison

162.6 mm 75.9 mm 8.8 mm 206 g162.6 mm 75.9 mm 8.8 mm 206 g160.94 mm 74.44 mm 8.13 mm 190 g158 mm 77.8 mm 8.1 mm 226 g156.7 mm 74.3 mm 8.8 mm 191 g157.6 mm 74.1 mm 7.8 mm 198 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
633 (min: 561, max: 684) MBit/s ∼100% +34%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
580 (min: 550, max: 597) MBit/s ∼92% +23%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Adreno 640, 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
471 (min: 347, max: 505) MBit/s ∼74%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
467 (min: 375, max: 519) MBit/s ∼74% -1%
OnePlus 7T
Adreno 640, 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
430 (min: 374, max: 485) MBit/s ∼68% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
383 (min: 242, max: 434) MBit/s ∼61% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=456)
230 MBit/s ∼36% -51%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
589 (min: 461, max: 625) MBit/s ∼100% +67%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
471 (min: 438, max: 506) MBit/s ∼80% +34%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
457 (min: 398, max: 508) MBit/s ∼78% +30%
OnePlus 7T
Adreno 640, 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
422 (min: 238, max: 447) MBit/s ∼72% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
389 (min: 366, max: 444) MBit/s ∼66% +11%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Adreno 640, 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
352 (min: 311, max: 375) MBit/s ∼60%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=456)
218 MBit/s ∼37% -38%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø470 (347-505)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø352 (311-375)
GPS OnePlus 7T Pro – overview
GPS OnePlus 7T Pro – overview
GPS OnePlus 7T Pro – bend
GPS OnePlus 7T Pro – bend
GPS OnePlus 7T Pro – bridge
GPS OnePlus 7T Pro – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – curve
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – curve
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker Photo
18.9 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
26.5 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
32.1 ∆E
20 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
26.8 ∆E
24.6 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
26.9 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
22 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 7T Pro: 21.52 ∆E min: 9.6 - max: 32.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Photo
18.4 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
20 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 7T Pro: 8.87 ∆E min: 1.73 - max: 20 ∆E
Test chart - perfect lighting
Test chart - perfect lighting
Test chart - 1 lux
609
cd/m²
609
cd/m²
622
cd/m²
597
cd/m²
606
cd/m²
627
cd/m²
603
cd/m²
606
cd/m²
620
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 627 cd/m² Médio: 611 cd/m² Minimum: 2.19 cd/m²
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 606 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.46 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.258
OnePlus 7T Pro
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
OLED, 3040x1440, 6.4
OnePlus 7 Pro
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5
OnePlus 7T
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Screen
-5%
21%
7%
28%
-7%
Brightness middle
606
710
17%
586
-3%
594
-2%
790
30%
693
14%
Brightness
611
721
18%
584
-4%
607
-1%
790
29%
703
15%
Brightness Distribution
95
97
2%
97
2%
91
-4%
97
2%
96
1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.46
3.7
-7%
1.39
60%
1.51
56%
1.4
60%
3.42
1%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.64
10.3
-83%
2.7
52%
4.27
24%
3.4
40%
6.12
-9%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2
1.5
25%
1.6
20%
2.6
-30%
1.9
5%
3.3
-65%
Gamma
2.258 97%
2.1 105%
2.243 98%
2.219 99%
2.23 99%
2.265 97%
CCT
6779 96%
6611 98%
6672 97%
6390 102%
6466 101%
6799 96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 294 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 294 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 294 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9364 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.4 ms).
Geekbench 5
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2430 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2507 Points ∼97% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (2430 - 2732, n=2)
2581 Points ∼100% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 3222, n=28)
1548 Points ∼60% -36%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2716 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4274 Points ∼100% +57%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2707 Points ∼63% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (2652 - 2727, n=4)
2701 Points ∼63% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 4593, n=34)
2039 Points ∼48% -25%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2940 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2306 Points ∼71% -22%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3242 Points ∼100% +10%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2753 Points ∼85% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (2519 - 2940, n=4)
2788 Points ∼86% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (807 - 3575, n=45)
1989 Points ∼61% -32%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
792 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
836 Points ∼62% +6%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1344 Points ∼100% +70%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
783 Points ∼58% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (761 - 792, n=4)
782 Points ∼58% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (155 - 1344, n=45)
576 Points ∼43% -27%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10442 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7812 Points ∼75% -25%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9974 Points ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9296 Points ∼89% -11%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8702 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (8702 - 11690, n=4)
10384 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=396)
5356 Points ∼51% -49%
Work performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
12645 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
9793 Points ∼77% -23%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
11766 Points ∼92% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
11167 Points ∼88% -12%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10286 Points ∼81% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (10286 - 15193, n=4)
12758 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=563)
5817 Points ∼46% -54%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3564 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2488 Points ∼70% -30%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
3317 Points ∼93% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
2657 Points ∼75% -25%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3489 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (3489 - 3565, n=3)
3539 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=73)
2674 Points ∼75% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6527 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5530 Points ∼83% -15%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5794 Points ∼87% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5702 Points ∼86% -13%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6640 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (6521 - 6640, n=3)
6563 Points ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=73)
2752 Points ∼41% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5509 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4348 Points ∼79% -21%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4969 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4548 Points ∼82% -17%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5530 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (5506 - 5530, n=3)
5515 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=73)
2504 Points ∼45% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4683 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2925 Points ∼62% -38%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4429 Points ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3280 Points ∼70% -30%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4635 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4635 - 4737, n=4)
4685 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4737, n=403)
1988 Points ∼42% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8006 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5371 Points ∼67% -33%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7115 Points ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6739 Points ∼84% -16%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7977 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (7912 - 8006, n=4)
7975 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=403)
1803 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6916 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4529 Points ∼65% -35%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
6270 Points ∼91% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5440 Points ∼79% -21%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6875 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (6875 - 6916, n=4)
6898 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=404)
1673 Points ∼24% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4604 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3087 Points ∼67% -33%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4352 Points ∼94% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3288 Points ∼71% -29%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4517 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4517 - 4725, n=4)
4613 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4725, n=432)
1898 Points ∼41% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11448 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4449 Points ∼39% -61%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
10420 Points ∼91% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6730 Points ∼59% -41%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11433 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (11344 - 11448, n=4)
11418 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=432)
2406 Points ∼21% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8605 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4052 Points ∼47% -53%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7955 Points ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5460 Points ∼63% -37%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8531 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (8531 - 8651, n=4)
8598 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=432)
2018 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4519 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2977 Points ∼66% -34%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4063 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3724 Points ∼82% -18%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4038 Points ∼89% -11%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4492 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4438 - 4519, n=4)
4492 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4519, n=483)
1896 Points ∼42% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7044 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5186 Points ∼73% -26%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
6248 Points ∼87% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6325 Points ∼88% -10%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6088 Points ∼85% -14%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7150 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (7044 - 7150, n=4)
7080 Points ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=483)
1493 Points ∼21% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6266 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4452 Points ∼70% -29%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5581 Points ∼88% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5475 Points ∼87% -13%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5471 Points ∼87% -13%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6319 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (6253 - 6319, n=4)
6276 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=484)
1436 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4503 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2875 Points ∼64% -36%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4091 Points ∼91% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3726 Points ∼83% -17%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3839 Points ∼85% -15%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4377 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4370 - 4503, n=4)
4438 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4540, n=524)
1759 Points ∼39% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10637 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5303 Points ∼47% -50%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9845 Points ∼87% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6325 Points ∼56% -41%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
11302 Points ∼100% +6%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10781 Points ∼95% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (10637 - 11259, n=4)
10829 Points ∼96% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=523)
1959 Points ∼17% -82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8165 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4465 Points ∼54% -45%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7501 Points ∼91% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5478 Points ∼67% -33%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
7893 Points ∼96% -3%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8136 Points ∼99% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (8136 - 8338, n=4)
8201 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8338, n=526)
1689 Points ∼21% -79%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
30561 Points ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
32302 Points ∼95% +6%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
26936 Points ∼79% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
27278 Points ∼80% -11%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33898 Points ∼100% +11%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
33697 Points ∼99% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (30561 - 41296, n=4)
34029 Points ∼100% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=684)
14281 Points ∼42% -53%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
118129 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
70318 Points ∼34% -40%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
106829 Points ∼52% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
103955 Points ∼50% -12%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
206190 Points ∼100% +75%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
117304 Points ∼57% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (113347 - 118129, n=4)
116727 Points ∼57% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=682)
22374 Points ∼11% -81%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
72173 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
55740 Points ∼58% -23%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
64389 Points ∼66% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
63969 Points ∼66% -11%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
96826 Points ∼100% +34%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
75613 Points ∼78% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (72173 - 81679, n=4)
75410 Points ∼78% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=682)
18053 Points ∼19% -75%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
185 fps ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
96 fps ∼33% -48%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
166 fps ∼58% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
167 fps ∼58% -10%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
287 fps ∼100% +55%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
185 fps ∼64% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (166 - 185, n=3)
179 fps ∼62% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=700)
38.3 fps ∼13% -79%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
58 fps ∼84% -3%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
60 fps ∼87% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
69 fps ∼100% +15%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
59 fps ∼86% -2%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼86% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (59 - 61, n=3)
60 fps ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=709)
28.2 fps ∼41% -53%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
111 fps ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
67 fps ∼43% -40%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
101 fps ∼64% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
90 fps ∼57% -19%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
157 fps ∼100% +41%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
112 fps ∼71% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (100 - 112, n=3)
108 fps ∼69% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=606)
22 fps ∼14% -80%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼88% -7%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
55 fps ∼92% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼98% +4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +5%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼98% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (57 - 61, n=3)
59 fps ∼98% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=615)
19.5 fps ∼33% -66%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
79 fps ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
67 fps ∼67% -15%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
71 fps ∼71% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
62 fps ∼62% -22%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
100 fps ∼100% +27%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
79 fps ∼79% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (71 - 79, n=3)
76.3 fps ∼76% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=471)
18 fps ∼18% -77%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
40 fps ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
37 fps ∼62% -7%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
36 fps ∼60% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
51 fps ∼85% +28%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +50%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
58 fps ∼97% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (40 - 58, n=3)
52 fps ∼87% +30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=473)
16.8 fps ∼28% -58%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
16 fps ∼35% -6%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
15 fps ∼33% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼37% 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
46 fps ∼100% +171%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
27 fps ∼59% +59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (17 - 27, n=4)
22 fps ∼48% +29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=194)
10.1 fps ∼22% -41%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
19 fps ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
17 fps ∼59% -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
16 fps ∼55% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
24 fps ∼83% +26%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
29 fps ∼100% +53%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
18 fps ∼62% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (18 - 19, n=4)
18.5 fps ∼64% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=193)
7.01 fps ∼24% -63%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
26 fps ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
26 fps ∼45% 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
23 fps ∼40% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
36 fps ∼62% +38%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
58 fps ∼100% +123%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼71% +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (25 - 41, n=4)
33.3 fps ∼57% +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=198)
14.8 fps ∼26% -43%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
46 fps ∼61% -2%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
42 fps ∼56% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
42 fps ∼56% -11%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
75 fps ∼100% +60%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼63% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (47 - 47, n=4)
47 fps ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=198)
16.6 fps ∼22% -65%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
48 fps ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
43 fps ∼68% -10%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
42 fps ∼67% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
36 fps ∼57% -25%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
63 fps ∼100% +31%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼75% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (43 - 48, n=3)
46 fps ∼73% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=396)
12.3 fps ∼20% -74%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
24 fps ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
23 fps ∼48% -4%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
21 fps ∼44% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼85% +71%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
48 fps ∼100% +100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼85% +71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (24 - 41, n=3)
34.3 fps ∼71% +43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=400)
11 fps ∼23% -54%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4528 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
32.26 (min: 8.31, max: 85.07) fps ∼1% -99%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
37.3 fps ∼1% -99%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (42.2 - 4528, n=2)
2285 fps ∼50% -50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.24 - 4528, n=65)
86.3 fps ∼2% -98%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2850 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
27.18 (min: 8.36, max: 46.5) fps ∼1% -99%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
22.73 fps ∼1% -99%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
2850 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 2850, n=57)
63.9 fps ∼2% -98%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4462 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
38.5 (min: 9.69, max: 72.94) fps ∼1% -99%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
36.29 fps ∼1% -99%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (38.9 - 4462, n=2)
2250 fps ∼50% -50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 4462, n=55)
98.5 fps ∼2% -98%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4986 Score ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4967 Score ∼99% 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4969 Score ∼99% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4986 - 5025, n=2)
5006 Score ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 5025, n=62)
2227 Score ∼44% -55%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
1236 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1383 Points ∼79% +12%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
1364 Points ∼78% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
1076 Points ∼62% -13%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1745 Points ∼100% +41%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
1485 Points ∼85% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (1236 - 1485, n=3)
1395 Points ∼80% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=640)
763 Points ∼44% -38%
Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10618 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8401 Points ∼49% -21%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9421 Points ∼55% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8700 Points ∼51% -18%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
16996 Points ∼100% +60%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10611 Points ∼62% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (10467 - 10618, n=3)
10565 Points ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=640)
2094 Points ∼12% -80%
Memory (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5091 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4306 Points ∼81% -15%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5243 Points ∼98% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3922 Points ∼73% -23%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2350 Points ∼44% -54%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4869 Points ∼91% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4869 - 6077, n=3)
5346 Points ∼100% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=640)
1546 Points ∼29% -70%
System (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
9294 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8344 Points ∼59% -10%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9143 Points ∼64% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7423 Points ∼52% -20%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
14189 Points ∼100% +53%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8988 Points ∼63% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (8693 - 9294, n=3)
8992 Points ∼63% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=640)
3022 Points ∼21% -67%
Overall (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4992 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4520 Points ∼81% -9%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4982 Points ∼89% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4045 Points ∼72% -19%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5607 Points ∼100% +12%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5124 Points ∼91% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4992 - 5335, n=3)
5150 Points ∼92% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=640)
1515 Points ∼27% -70%
AnTuTu v8
UX (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
78191 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (70382 - 78191, n=2)
74287 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7553 - 78191, n=14)
36536 Points ∼47% -53%
MEM (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
64026 Points ∼82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (64026 - 92659, n=2)
78343 Points ∼100% +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (24176 - 92659, n=14)
45871 Points ∼59% -28%
GPU (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
199051 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (193059 - 199051, n=2)
196055 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5938 - 199051, n=14)
74515 Points ∼37% -63%
CPU (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
145386 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (145386 - 145684, n=2)
145535 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40810 - 145684, n=14)
84660 Points ∼58% -42%
Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
486654 Points ∼98%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (486654 - 501784, n=2)
494219 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (95354 - 501784, n=14)
241583 Points ∼49% -50%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
129.096 Points ∼100% +107%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
65.295 Points ∼51% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (62.4 - 67.3, n=3)
65 Points ∼50% +4%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
62.5 Points ∼48% 0%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
62.417 Points ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
58.746 Points ∼46% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samung Browser 9.0)
44.128 Points ∼34% -29%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=112)
36.1 Points ∼28% -42%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
301.91 Points ∼100% +162%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
120.83 Points ∼40% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (115 - 121, n=3)
118 Points ∼39% +2%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
115.44 Points ∼38%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
96.094 Points ∼32% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
91.774 Points ∼30% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=537)
42.2 Points ∼14% -63%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
153 runs/min ∼100% +130%
OnePlus 7T (Chome 76)
69.1 runs/min ∼45% +4%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chome 78)
66.4 runs/min ∼43%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chome 74)
61.5 runs/min ∼40% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (39.1 - 69.1, n=3)
58.2 runs/min ∼38% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
56 runs/min ∼37% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
42.5 runs/min ∼28% -36%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=100)
39.8 runs/min ∼26% -40%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
181 Points ∼100% +95%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
115 Points ∼64% +24%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
111 Points ∼61% +19%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
107 Points ∼59% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (93 - 111, n=3)
101 Points ∼56% +9%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
100 Points ∼55% +8%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
93 Points ∼51%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=170)
67.1 Points ∼37% -28%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
49388 Points ∼100% +106%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
25353 Points ∼51% +6%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
24730 Points ∼50% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (23999 - 25353, n=3)
24641 Points ∼50% +3%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
23999 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
20849 Points ∼42% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
20598 Points ∼42% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=698)
6865 Points ∼14% -71%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=723)
10475 ms * ∼100% -391%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
2333.5 ms * ∼22% -9%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
2133.5 ms * ∼20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (2007 - 2134, n=3)
2054 ms * ∼20% +4%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
2021.4 ms * ∼19% +5%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
1965 ms * ∼19% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
1856.6 ms * ∼18% +13%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
570.9 ms * ∼5% +73%

* ... smaller is better

OnePlus 7T ProSamsung Galaxy S10 PlusOnePlus 7 ProXiaomi Mi 9T ProOnePlus 7TAverage 256 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-30%
-2%
90%
-9%
57%
-61%
Random Write 4KB
26
22.7
-13%
24.8
-5%
148.51
471%
29.9
15%
80.1 (24.8 - 192, n=6)
208%
22.7 (0.14 - 250, n=758)
-13%
Random Read 4KB
169
135.16
-20%
174.1
3%
142.5
-16%
170.1
1%
180 (169 - 196, n=6)
7%
48.1 (1.59 - 196, n=758)
-72%
Sequential Write 256KB
405
249.06
-39%
387
-4%
196.87
-51%
218.4
-46%
461 (387 - 590, n=6)
14%
98.6 (2.99 - 590, n=758)
-76%
Sequential Read 256KB
1489
811.17
-46%
1468
-1%
808.76
-46%
1406
-6%
1482 (1463 - 1504, n=6)
0%
277 (12.1 - 1504, n=758)
-81%
0102030405060Tooltip
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.31.1.5: Ø59.9 (58-60)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.31.1.5: Ø59.9 (50-60)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.8.1a: Ø29.4 (25-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.8.1a: Ø29.9 (27-31)
; Shadow Fight 3; high; 1.19.2: Ø59.6 (52-60)
; Shadow Fight 3; minimal; 1.19.2: Ø59.9 (59-60)
Carga Máxima
 46.9 °C45.3 °C40.4 °C 
 46.1 °C44.9 °C40.5 °C 
 44.9 °C43.7 °C40.5 °C 
Máximo: 46.9 °C
Médio: 43.7 °C
37.8 °C41 °C43.8 °C
38.2 °C40.1 °C42.6 °C
38 °C41 °C41.5 °C
Máximo: 43.8 °C
Médio: 40.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  42.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.9 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.231.22537.534.13130.529.3403329.65037.635.86328.625.88023.922.210022.824.712521.929.216020.338.82002045.825019.153.53151756.640016.556.150016.86063016.260.580015.564.6100014.869.1125014.171.4160015.573.9200015.572.5250014.571.2315013.869.7400013.767500013.866.863001465.580001466.91000014.165.71250014.263.41600014.353SPL65.168.168.164.360.964.462.127.181.4N18.721.921.916.313.816.914.70.948median 15.5median 64.6Delta1.97.947.650.144.645.140.239.737.739.938.440.831.933.828.73029.137.42839.626.349.925.858.624.463.72465.823.864.422.568.922.569.421.773.521.881.821.179.822.381.322.180.221.181.420.980.720.680.620.878.920.770.620.967.72168.120.969.72163.875.633.790.934.92.183.1median 21.8median 69.429.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnePlus 7T ProOnePlus 7 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
OnePlus 7T Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

OnePlus 7 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 2.1 / 3 / 3.5 Watt
Carga midlight 5.3 / 8.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
OnePlus 7T Pro
4085 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
4100 mAh
OnePlus 7 Pro
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
OnePlus 7T
3800 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
26%
22%
36%
26%
28%
18%
39%
Idle Minimum *
2.1
0.73
65%
0.9
57%
0.7
67%
0.92
56%
0.9
57%
1.445 (0.68 - 2.1, n=4)
31%
0.883 (0.2 - 3.4, n=787)
58%
Idle Average *
3
1.53
49%
1.8
40%
1
67%
2.9
3%
1.4
53%
2.11 (1.05 - 3, n=4)
30%
1.74 (0.6 - 6.2, n=786)
42%
Idle Maximum *
3.5
2.07
41%
2.9
17%
1.3
63%
2.94
16%
2.9
17%
2.74 (1.07 - 3.5, n=4)
22%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=787)
42%
Load Average *
5.3
6.03
-14%
5.5
-4%
5.2
2%
3.65
31%
4.7
11%
4.86 (4.14 - 5.3, n=4)
8%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=781)
23%
Load Maximum *
8.3
9.18
-11%
8.2
1%
10
-20%
6.18
26%
8.3
-0%
8.49 (8.3 - 9.05, n=4)
-2%
5.93 (1.2 - 14.2, n=781)
29%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
33h 35min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
15h 12min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 57min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 43min
OnePlus 7T Pro
4085 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
4100 mAh
OnePlus 7 Pro
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
OnePlus 7T
3800 mAh
Battery Runtime
-27%
-16%
-9%
29%
-1%
Reader / Idle
2015
1560
-23%
1745
-13%
1768
-12%
2618
30%
2003
-1%
H.264
957
921
-4%
802
-16%
987
3%
1346
41%
967
1%
WiFi v1.3
912
483
-47%
768
-16%
762
-16%
909
0%
896
-2%
Load
283
187
-34%
236
-17%
249
-12%
408
44%
283
0%

Pro

+ Bom alto-falantes
+ Ótimas câmeras
+ Design sem entalhe
+ Bonita tampa traseira mate
+ Alto desempenho
+ GPS bastante preciso
+ Muitas bandas LTE
+ Carga muito rápida
+ Tela HDR de alta resolução com boa precisão de cores
+ A tecnologia de 90-Hz garante um uso fluente

Contra

- Forte emissão de calor e superaquecimento sob carga extrema
- Sem carregamento sem fio
- Sem garantia por danos por poeira e água
- Software limpo e amplo
- Sem 90 Hz para jogos, de fábrica

Veredicto – A OnePlus tem uma excelente oferta

Review: OnePlus 7T Pro. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de
Review: OnePlus 7T Pro. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de

A OnePlus ainda tem o toque: O OnePlus 7T Pro é outro smartphone de alta qualidade que tem vários destaques, incluindo uma tela de 90 Hz, uma câmera com zoom 3x, uma carcaça mate e ótimos alto-falantes estéreo. Tudo isso vem com um preço ainda um pouco abaixo do de outros smartphones de última geração. Ainda assim, os dias em que os principais telefones OnePlus eram uma pechincha disponível por menos de US$ 400 terminaram. A Xiaomi é a empresa preferida para essa faixa de preço no momento com o seu Mi 9T Pro.

Os usuários ainda terão que se contentar com a ausência de alguns dos habituais recursos de carro-chefe: Por exemplo, não há garantia para a impermeabilidade do telefone, nem carregamento sem fio, nem slot microSD. Os fanáticos de longa data do OnePlus também podem sentir falta do conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, embora isso ocorra há algumas gerações. O smartphone também reduz seu desempenho sob carga extrema e seu Wi-Fi é mais lento que o dos dispositivos topo de gama.

O OnePlus 7T Pro é um smartphone de gama alta e uma excelente oferta, embora já não seja uma pechincha.

Se você aceitar alguns recursos de conectividade ausentes, obterá muitos recursos adicionais que os smartphones de última geração comuns não oferecem: Embora a tecnologia de carregamento rápido do OnePlus não seja mais incontestada como era há alguns anos atrás, ainda é uma das mais rápidas. A ampla gama de software limpo a amplo com atualizações regulares e uma tela sem entalhes são uma vantagem adicional.

Em suma, o OnePlus 7T Pro vale o dinheiro. Se você está procurando um smartphone de alta qualidade, definitivamente deve levar este dispositivo em consideração.  

OnePlus 7T Pro - 11/03/2019 v7
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
89%
Teclado
66 / 75 → 88%
Mouse
98%
Conectividade
46 / 70 → 66%
Peso
88%
Bateria
90%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
59 / 64 → 92%
Desempenho da aplicação
78 / 86 → 90%
Temperatura
85%
Ruído
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Camera
76%
Médio
80%
87%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone OnePlus 7T Pro – o carregador mais rápido
Florian Schmitt, 2019-11- 6 (Update: 2019-11-15)