Breve Análise do Smartphone OnePlus 7 Pro
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
|
iluminação: 97 %
iluminação com acumulador: 586 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.39 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.243
OnePlus 7 Pro AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67 | Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus OLED, 3040x1440, 6.40 | Apple iPhone Xs Max OLED, 2688x1242, 6.50 | Xiaomi Mi 9 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39 | OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41 | Huawei P30 Pro OLED, 2340x1080, 6.47 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -66% | -3% | 11% | -189% | -16% | |
Brightness middle | 586 | 710 21% | 656 12% | 593 1% | 435 -26% | 597 2% |
Brightness | 584 | 721 23% | 659 13% | 587 1% | 442 -24% | 608 4% |
Brightness Distribution | 97 | 97 0% | 88 -9% | 94 -3% | 95 -2% | 89 -8% |
Black Level * | ||||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.39 | 3.7 -166% | 1.7 -22% | 0.9 35% | 6.79 -388% | 2.2 -58% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.7 | 10.3 -281% | 2.8 -4% | 2 26% | 14.93 -453% | 3.6 -33% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 1.5 6% | 1.7 -6% | 1.5 6% | 5.4 -238% | 1.6 -0% |
Gamma | 2.243 98% | 2.1 105% | 1.998 110% | 2.27 97% | 2.252 98% | 2.23 99% |
CCT | 6672 97% | 6611 98% | 6487 100% | 6548 99% | 7588 86% | 6268 104% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 122 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 122 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 122 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms). |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Apple iPhone Xs Max | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3406 - 3537, n=14) | |
Average of class Smartphone (800 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years) | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Apple iPhone Xs Max | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (10187 - 11388, n=14) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (7372 - 8024, n=12) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 18432, n=71, last 2 years) |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (10330 - 14439, n=19) | |
Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (8342 - 11440, n=19) | |
Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years) |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Apple iPhone Xs Max | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (59 - 91, n=20) | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=180, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Apple iPhone Xs Max | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (85 - 167, n=20) | |
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=180, last 2 years) |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Apple iPhone Xs Max | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (46 - 85, n=20) | |
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=181, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Apple iPhone Xs Max | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (50 - 102, n=20) | |
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=181, last 2 years) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Apple iPhone Xs Max | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (27 - 58, n=20) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=181, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Apple iPhone Xs Max | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (35 - 71, n=20) | |
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=181, last 2 years) |
Basemark GPU 1.1 | |
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (24.5 - 36.3, n=3) | |
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (22.7 - 32.2, n=2) | |
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (33.1 - 37.4, n=3) |
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Apple iPhone Xs Max | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (217967 - 398720, n=16) |
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (4486 - 4969, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1010 - 10071, n=14, last 2 years) |
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Apple iPhone Xs Max | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Huawei P30 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1075 - 1425, n=4) | |
Average of class Smartphone (177 - 6114, n=61, last 2 years) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=170, last 2 years) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (45.5 - 67, n=16) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samung Browser 9.0) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=154, last 2 years) | |
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (42.5 - 67.9, n=15) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chome 74) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12) | |
Average of class Smartphone (37 - 304, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (90 - 129, n=20) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12) | |
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=205, last 2 years) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17011 - 33918, n=21) | |
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition (Chrome 71) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition (Chrome 71) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1852 - 2611, n=19) | |
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73) | |
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=168, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12) |
* ... smaller is better
OnePlus 7 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | Xiaomi Mi 9 | OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition | Huawei P30 Pro | Average 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -28% | 125% | -28% | 116% | 181% | 299% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 1468 | 811 -45% | 666 -55% | 733 -50% | 849 -42% | 1573 ? 7% | 1471 ? 0% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 387 | 249.1 -36% | 388.3 0% | 253.3 -35% | 250.8 -35% | 559 ? 44% | 1084 ? 180% |
Random Read 4KB | 174.1 | 135.2 -22% | 149.4 -14% | 145.1 -17% | 174.4 0% | 209 ? 20% | 243 ? 40% |
Random Write 4KB | 24.8 | 22.7 -8% | 165.3 567% | 22.3 -10% | 159.2 542% | 186.4 ? 652% | 267 ? 977% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 73 ? | 82.6 ? | 70.6 ? | ||||
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 60.7 ? | 68.2 ? | 59.8 ? |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
OnePlus 7 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 87% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 87% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 87% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (123.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 66.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 66.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 66.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (119.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0 / 0.1 Watt |
Ocioso | 0.9 / 1.8 / 2.9 Watt |
Carga |
5.5 / 8.2 Watt |
OnePlus 7 Pro 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 4100 mAh | Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh | OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition 3700 mAh | Huawei P30 Pro 4200 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 8% | 17% | 26% | 20% | 7% | 11% | 13% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.9 | 0.73 19% | 1 -11% | 0.67 26% | 0.6 33% | 0.68 24% | 0.939 ? -4% | 0.896 ? -0% |
Idle Average * | 1.8 | 1.53 15% | 1.4 22% | 1.26 30% | 1.3 28% | 2.6 -44% | 1.506 ? 16% | 1.449 ? 19% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.9 | 2.07 29% | 1.7 41% | 1.29 56% | 2.1 28% | 2.77 4% | 1.799 ? 38% | 1.629 ? 44% |
Load Average * | 5.5 | 6.03 -10% | 4.6 16% | 3.71 33% | 4.5 18% | 3.74 32% | 4.61 ? 16% | 5.51 ? -0% |
Load Maximum * | 8.2 | 9.18 -12% | 6.7 18% | 9.3 -13% | 8.6 -5% | 6.82 17% | 9.04 ? -10% | 8.19 ? -0% |
* ... smaller is better
OnePlus 7 Pro 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 4100 mAh | Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh | OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition 3700 mAh | Huawei P30 Pro 4200 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -14% | -9% | -7% | 18% | 29% | |
Reader / Idle | 1745 | 1560 -11% | 1305 -25% | 1650 -5% | 1966 13% | |
H.264 | 802 | 921 15% | 801 0% | 1008 26% | 1193 49% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 768 | 483 -37% | 742 -3% | 546 -29% | 905 18% | 838 9% |
Load | 236 | 187 -21% | 223 -6% | 194 -18% | 344 46% |
Pro
Contra
Initial Verdict
O OnePlus 7 Pro já nos impressionou, apesar de ainda termos alguns testes para completar. O dispositivo possui armazenamento rápido, duração de bateria decente, carregamento ridiculamente rápido, um design premium, um scanner de digitais aprimorado e uma tela sem entalhes. Ah, e ele também tem uma tela de 90 Hz. E estávamos esquecendo da câmera frontal pop-up motorizada, que certamente chamara a atenção. Os alto falantes estéreo também nos impressionaram, com seu som encorpado e quente.
O 7 Pro pode ser o dispositivo OnePlus mais caro até hoje, mas ainda assim se sai muito bem contra os concorrentes, independentemente de qual versão você comprar. O OnePlus 7 regular pode, no entanto, oferecer uma relação preço-qualidade ainda maior, o qual será testado em breve.
Temos algumas críticas. A tela curva tem mais estilo do que substância, enquanto é um smartphone robusto e comparativamente longo. Além disso, o 7 Pro também fica relativamente quente, a ponto de ser difícil para algumas pessoas segurar o dispositivo durante sessões prolongadas de jogo. Desejamos que a OnePlus também certificasse seus dispositivos e acrescentasse o carregamento sem fio, já que são coisas fáceis para criticar do 7 Pro quando comparado a outros carros-chefes. Outros dispositivos também oferecem Wi-Fi mais rápido, e a justificativa da OnePlus de remover o conector para fones de ouvido ainda parece frágil, na melhor das hipóteses.