snhb.queue.push(function(){ snhb.addAdditionalAdSlotsToRefresh(additionalAdSlots); }); googletag.enableServices(); }); nbc_pagecall();
Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone OnePlus 7T: Um grande pacote de melhorias

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 10/19/2019

O Pro se torna normal. O OnePlus 7T é uma atualização poderosa do seu antecessor e vem com muitos recursos anteriormente reservados para o modelo "Pro". Isso parece bom para todos os compradores, mas você descobrirá nesta análise se o telefone de gama alta do orçamento realmente vale a pena.

OnePlus 7T (7 Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 640
Memória
8192 MB 
Pantalha
6.55 polegadas 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, entalhe em forma de lágrima, 90 Hz, Brilhante: sim, HDR
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 101 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: Saída de áudio via USB-C, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G, 3G, 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B29/​B32/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.13 x 160.94 x 74.44
Bateria
3800 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Carga rápida WarpCharge 30T (30 watts)
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/​1.6, contrast detection AF, phase detection AF, OIS, dual LED flash, videos @2160p/​60fps (camera 1); 16.0MP, f/​2.2, wide-angle lens (camera 2); 12.0MP, f/​2.2, telephoto lens (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/​2.0, videos @1080p/​30fps
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador rápido, cabo USB-C, capa de silicone, SIM tool, OnePlus Community, OnePlus Switch, Game Space, 24 Meses Garantia, LTE Cat 18/​13 (1200Mbps/​150Mbps); A-GPS (L1/​L5), GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo (E1/​E5a); SAR: 1.06 W/kg (head), 0.93 W/kg (body), fanless
peso
190 g, Suprimento de energia: 128 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison devices

RatingratingversionDateModelWeightHeightSizeResolutionBest Price
86%710/2019OnePlus 7T
855+, Adreno 640
190 g8.13 mm6.55"2400x1080
85%705/2019OnePlus 7
855, Adreno 640
182 g8.2 mm6.41"2340x1080
86%705/2019OnePlus 7 Pro
855, Adreno 640
206 g8.8 mm6.67"3120x1440
89%608/2019Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
855, Adreno 640
191 g8.8 mm6.39"2340x1080
87%709/2019Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
194 g8.3 mm6.1"1792x828
85%703/2019Samsung Galaxy S10e
9820, Mali-G76 MP12
150 g7.9 mm5.8"2280x1080
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T

Size comparison

162.6 mm 75.9 mm 8.8 mm 206 g160.94 mm 74.44 mm 8.13 mm 190 g157.7 mm 74.8 mm 8.2 mm 182 g156.7 mm 74.3 mm 8.8 mm 191 g150.9 mm 75.7 mm 8.3 mm 194 g142.2 mm 69.9 mm 7.9 mm 150 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
563 (min: 490, max: 597) MBit/s ∼100% +31%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
520 (min: 445, max: 571) MBit/s ∼92% +21%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
467 (min: 375, max: 519) MBit/s ∼83% +9%
OnePlus 7T
Adreno 640, 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
430 (min: 374, max: 485) MBit/s ∼76%
OnePlus 7
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
388 (min: 361, max: 421) MBit/s ∼69% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
383 (min: 242, max: 434) MBit/s ∼68% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=449)
228 MBit/s ∼40% -47%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
529 (min: 204, max: 603) MBit/s ∼100% +25%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
471 (min: 438, max: 506) MBit/s ∼89% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
468 (min: 351, max: 489) MBit/s ∼88% +11%
OnePlus 7T
Adreno 640, 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
422 (min: 238, max: 447) MBit/s ∼80%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
389 (min: 366, max: 444) MBit/s ∼74% -8%
OnePlus 7
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
330 (min: 232, max: 365) MBit/s ∼62% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=449)
217 MBit/s ∼41% -49%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø430 (374-485)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø422 (238-447)
GPS OnePlus 7T – Overview
GPS OnePlus 7T – Overview
GPS OnePlus 7T – Turning point
GPS OnePlus 7T – Turning point
GPS OnePlus 7T – Bridge
GPS OnePlus 7T – Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Turning point
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Turning point
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Standard lens photo
Standard lens photo
Standard lens photo
Standard lens photo
Telephoto lens photo
Standard lens photo
Wide-angle lens photo
Night mode photo
ColorChecker Photo
5.3 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 7T: 6.84 ∆E min: 2.08 - max: 14.39 ∆E
ColorChecker Photo
15.6 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
12 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
10 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 7T: 10.22 ∆E min: 3.21 - max: 19.38 ∆E
Test chart under perfect lighting
Test chart under perfect lighting
Test chart at 1 lux
723
cd/m²
698
cd/m²
701
cd/m²
704
cd/m²
693
cd/m²
703
cd/m²
699
cd/m²
696
cd/m²
711
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 723 cd/m² Médio: 703.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.26 cd/m²
iluminação: 96 %
iluminação com acumulador: 693 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.42 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.265
OnePlus 7T
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
OnePlus 7
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41
OnePlus 7 Pro
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Apple iPhone 11
IPS, 1792x828, 6.1
Samsung Galaxy S10e
AMOLED, 2280x1080, 5.8
Screen
-7%
23%
12%
33%
8%
Brightness middle
693
603
-13%
586
-15%
594
-14%
679
-2%
426
-39%
Brightness
703
605
-14%
584
-17%
607
-14%
671
-5%
427
-39%
Brightness Distribution
96
94
-2%
97
1%
91
-5%
93
-3%
96
0%
Black Level *
0.68
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.42
3.5
-2%
1.39
59%
1.51
56%
0.8
77%
2.14
37%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.12
7.7
-26%
2.7
56%
4.27
30%
2.4
61%
3.29
46%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.3
2.7
18%
1.6
52%
2.6
21%
1.1
67%
1.8
45%
Gamma
2.265 97%
2.266 97%
2.243 98%
2.219 99%
2.24 98%
2.111 104%
CCT
6799 96%
6775 96%
6672 97%
6390 102%
6610 98%
6329 103%
Contrast
999

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 357 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 357 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 357 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9279 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.6 ms).
Geekbench 5
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2707 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (2652 - 2716, n=3)
2692 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 4593, n=29)
1987 Points ∼73% -27%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2753 Points ∼79%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3463 Points ∼100% +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (2753 - 2940, n=3)
2878 Points ∼83% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (807 - 3575, n=39)
2004 Points ∼58% -27%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
783 Points ∼58%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1343 Points ∼100% +72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (783 - 792, n=3)
789 Points ∼59% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (155 - 1344, n=39)
585 Points ∼44% -25%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8317 Points ∼82%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7372 Points ∼72% -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7470 Points ∼73% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
10170 Points ∼100% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
8317 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=325)
4691 Points ∼46% -44%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11388 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
11388 Points ∼100% 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
10812 Points ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10976 Points ∼96% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
10553 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
11388 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=384)
4726 Points ∼41% -59%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3705 Points ∼82%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3510 Points ∼78% -5%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
3472 Points ∼77% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3429 Points ∼76% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4506 Points ∼100% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
3705 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=384)
1426 Points ∼32% -62%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8702 Points ∼87%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9205 Points ∼92% +6%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9974 Points ∼100% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9296 Points ∼93% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
7966 Points ∼80% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (8702 - 10700, n=3)
9948 Points ∼100% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11440, n=388)
5333 Points ∼53% -39%
Work performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10286 Points ∼85%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
12095 Points ∼100% +18%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
11766 Points ∼97% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
11167 Points ∼92% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
10008 Points ∼83% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (10286 - 12907, n=3)
11946 Points ∼99% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 14946, n=556)
5785 Points ∼48% -44%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3489 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3324 Points ∼94% -5%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
3317 Points ∼94% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
2657 Points ∼75% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (3489 - 3564, n=2)
3527 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=68)
2676 Points ∼76% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6640 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5862 Points ∼88% -12%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5794 Points ∼87% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5702 Points ∼86% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (6527 - 6640, n=2)
6584 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=68)
2721 Points ∼41% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5530 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5012 Points ∼91% -9%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4969 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4548 Points ∼82% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (5509 - 5530, n=2)
5520 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=68)
2478 Points ∼45% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4635 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4416 Points ∼95% -5%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4429 Points ∼95% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3280 Points ∼70% -29%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3219 Points ∼69% -31%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
3106 Points ∼67% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4635 - 4683, n=3)
4667 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4683, n=396)
1981 Points ∼42% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7977 Points ∼98%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7089 Points ∼87% -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7115 Points ∼88% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6739 Points ∼83% -16%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
8119 Points ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
5368 Points ∼66% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (7977 - 8006, n=3)
7996 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=396)
1787 Points ∼22% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6875 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6249 Points ∼91% -9%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
6270 Points ∼91% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5440 Points ∼79% -21%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6067 Points ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4620 Points ∼67% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (6875 - 6916, n=3)
6902 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=397)
1658 Points ∼24% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4517 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4405 Points ∼96% -2%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4352 Points ∼95% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3288 Points ∼72% -27%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3411 Points ∼75% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
3077 Points ∼67% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4517 - 4604, n=3)
4575 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=424)
1893 Points ∼41% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11433 Points ∼64%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10302 Points ∼58% -10%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
10420 Points ∼58% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6730 Points ∼38% -41%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
17853 Points ∼100% +56%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4886 Points ∼27% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (11433 - 11448, n=3)
11443 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=424)
2386 Points ∼13% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8531 Points ∼93%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7940 Points ∼86% -7%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7955 Points ∼86% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5460 Points ∼59% -36%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
9199 Points ∼100% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4321 Points ∼47% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (8531 - 8605, n=3)
8580 Points ∼93% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=424)
2004 Points ∼22% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4492 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4093 Points ∼91% -9%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4063 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3724 Points ∼83% -17%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2429 Points ∼54% -46%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
3005 Points ∼67% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4492 - 4519, n=3)
4510 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4519, n=476)
1888 Points ∼42% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7150 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6336 Points ∼89% -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
6248 Points ∼87% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6325 Points ∼88% -12%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5726 Points ∼80% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
5206 Points ∼73% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (7044 - 7150, n=3)
7079 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=476)
1478 Points ∼21% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6319 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5648 Points ∼89% -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5581 Points ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5475 Points ∼87% -13%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4400 Points ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4477 Points ∼71% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (6266 - 6319, n=3)
6284 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=477)
1423 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4377 Points ∼98%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4068 Points ∼91% -7%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4091 Points ∼92% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3726 Points ∼84% -15%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
2906 Points ∼65% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4377 - 4503, n=3)
4461 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4540, n=516)
1754 Points ∼39% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10781 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10008 Points ∼93% -7%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9845 Points ∼91% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6325 Points ∼59% -41%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4507 Points ∼42% -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (10637 - 10781, n=3)
10685 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=515)
1936 Points ∼18% -82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8136 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7556 Points ∼93% -7%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7501 Points ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5478 Points ∼67% -33%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4015 Points ∼49% -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (8136 - 8165, n=3)
8155 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8165, n=518)
1674 Points ∼21% -79%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
33697 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
26936 Points ∼80% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
27278 Points ∼81% -19%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33864 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
32155 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (30561 - 33697, n=3)
31606 Points ∼93% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=676)
14217 Points ∼42% -58%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
117304 Points ∼56%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
106829 Points ∼51% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
103955 Points ∼50% -11%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
209204 Points ∼100% +78%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
72022 Points ∼34% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (117304 - 118129, n=3)
117854 Points ∼56% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=674)
22183 Points ∼11% -81%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
75613 Points ∼78%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
64389 Points ∼66% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
63969 Points ∼66% -15%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
97276 Points ∼100% +29%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
56465 Points ∼58% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (72173 - 75613, n=3)
73320 Points ∼75% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=674)
17924 Points ∼18% -76%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
185 fps ∼57%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
167 fps ∼52% -10%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
166 fps ∼52% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
167 fps ∼52% -10%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
322 fps ∼100% +74%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
141 fps ∼44% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (185 - 185, n=2)
185 fps ∼57% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=694)
38.1 fps ∼12% -79%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼86%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼87% +2%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
60 fps ∼87% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
69 fps ∼100% +17%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼87% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
60 fps ∼87% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (59 - 60, n=2)
59.5 fps ∼86% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=703)
28.1 fps ∼41% -52%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
112 fps ∼64%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
100 fps ∼57% -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
101 fps ∼58% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
90 fps ∼51% -20%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
175 fps ∼100% +56%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
85 fps ∼49% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (111 - 112, n=2)
112 fps ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=600)
21.9 fps ∼13% -80%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼98%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +2%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
55 fps ∼92% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼98% 0%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
59 fps ∼98% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (57 - 59, n=2)
58 fps ∼97% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=609)
19.4 fps ∼32% -67%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
79 fps ∼68%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
67 fps ∼57% -15%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
71 fps ∼61% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
62 fps ∼53% -22%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
117 fps ∼100% +48%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
53 fps ∼45% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (79 - 79, n=2)
79 fps ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=466)
17.9 fps ∼15% -77%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
58 fps ∼97%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps ∼95% -2%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
36 fps ∼60% -38%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
51 fps ∼85% -12%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
53 fps ∼88% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (40 - 58, n=2)
49 fps ∼82% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=468)
16.7 fps ∼28% -71%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
27 fps ∼45%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
26 fps ∼43% -4%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
15 fps ∼25% -44%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼28% -37%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +122%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
28 fps ∼47% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (17 - 27, n=3)
20.3 fps ∼34% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=189)
9.99 fps ∼17% -63%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
18 fps ∼55%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼52% -6%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
16 fps ∼48% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
24 fps ∼73% +33%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33 fps ∼100% +83%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
16 fps ∼48% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (18 - 19, n=3)
18.7 fps ∼57% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=188)
6.98 fps ∼21% -61%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼68%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
38 fps ∼63% -7%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
23 fps ∼38% -44%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
36 fps ∼60% -12%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +46%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
16 fps ∼27% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (25 - 41, n=3)
30.7 fps ∼51% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=193)
14.7 fps ∼25% -64%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼54%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
43 fps ∼49% -9%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
42 fps ∼48% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
42 fps ∼48% -11%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
87 fps ∼100% +85%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
41 fps ∼47% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (47 - 47, n=3)
47 fps ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=193)
16.4 fps ∼19% -65%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼64%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
42 fps ∼58% -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
42 fps ∼58% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
36 fps ∼49% -23%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
73 fps ∼100% +55%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
43 fps ∼59% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (47 - 48, n=2)
47.5 fps ∼65% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=391)
12.2 fps ∼17% -74%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼68%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
37 fps ∼62% -10%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
21 fps ∼35% -49%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼68% 0%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +46%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
40 fps ∼67% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (24 - 41, n=2)
32.5 fps ∼54% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=395)
10.9 fps ∼18% -73%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
395265 Points ∼87%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
370908 Points ∼81% -6%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
369294 Points ∼81% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
372734 Points ∼82% -6%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
456891 Points ∼100% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
329444 Points ∼72% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
395265 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 462516, n=295)
143117 Points ∼31% -64%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
1485 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
1407 Points ∼95% -5%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
1364 Points ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
1076 Points ∼72% -28%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
1439 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (1236 - 1485, n=2)
1361 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=635)
760 Points ∼51% -49%
Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10611 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9477 Points ∼89% -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9421 Points ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8700 Points ∼82% -18%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
8484 Points ∼80% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (10611 - 10618, n=2)
10615 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=635)
2070 Points ∼20% -80%
Memory (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4869 Points ∼87%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5610 Points ∼100% +15%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5243 Points ∼93% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3922 Points ∼70% -19%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4474 Points ∼80% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4869 - 5091, n=2)
4980 Points ∼89% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=635)
1530 Points ∼27% -69%
System (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8988 Points ∼98%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8986 Points ∼98% 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9143 Points ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7423 Points ∼81% -17%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
7831 Points ∼86% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (8988 - 9294, n=2)
9141 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=635)
2994 Points ∼33% -67%
Overall (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5124 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5089 Points ∼99% -1%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4982 Points ∼97% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4045 Points ∼79% -21%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4548 Points ∼89% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4992 - 5124, n=2)
5058 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=635)
1501 Points ∼29% -71%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
132.886 Points ∼100% +104%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
65.295 Points ∼49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (62.4 - 65.3, n=2)
63.9 Points ∼48% -2%
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
63.057 Points ∼47% -3%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
62.5 Points ∼47% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
58.746 Points ∼44% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=107)
35.7 Points ∼27% -45%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
293.36 Points ∼100% +143%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
120.83 Points ∼41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (115 - 121, n=2)
118 Points ∼40% -2%
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
117.76 Points ∼40% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
96.094 Points ∼33% -20%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=532)
41.9 Points ∼14% -65%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
157 runs/min ∼100% +127%
OnePlus 7T (Chome 76)
69.1 runs/min ∼44%
OnePlus 7 (Chome 74)
67.9 runs/min ∼43% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (66.4 - 69.1, n=2)
67.8 runs/min ∼43% -2%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chome 74)
61.5 runs/min ∼39% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
42.5 runs/min ∼27% -38%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=95)
39.9 runs/min ∼25% -42%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
184 Points ∼100% +84%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
111 Points ∼60% +11%
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
110 Points ∼60% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
107 Points ∼58% +7%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
100 Points ∼54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (93 - 100, n=2)
96.5 Points ∼52% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=165)
67 Points ∼36% -33%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
48819 Points ∼100% +93%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
25353 Points ∼52%
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
25051 Points ∼51% -1%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
24730 Points ∼51% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (23999 - 25353, n=2)
24676 Points ∼51% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
20598 Points ∼42% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S10e (Chrome 73)
18697 Points ∼38% -26%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=693)
6801 Points ∼14% -73%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=718)
10523 ms * ∼100% -421%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
2333.5 ms * ∼22% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S10e (Chrome 73)
2239.5 ms * ∼21% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (2021 - 2134, n=2)
2077 ms * ∼20% -3%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
2021.4 ms * ∼19%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
1965 ms * ∼19% +3%
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
1958 ms * ∼19% +3%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
572.8 ms * ∼5% +72%

* ... smaller is better

OnePlus 7TOnePlus 7OnePlus 7 ProXiaomi Mi 9T ProApple iPhone 11Samsung Galaxy S10eAverage 128 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
21%
17%
82%
-24%
77%
-58%
Random Write 4KB
29.9
28.7
-4%
24.8
-17%
148.51
397%
24.1
-19%
100 (29.9 - 170, n=2)
234%
22.3 (0.14 - 250, n=752)
-25%
Random Read 4KB
170.1
175.3
3%
174.1
2%
142.5
-16%
136.9
-20%
181 (170 - 192, n=2)
6%
47.6 (1.59 - 196, n=752)
-72%
Sequential Write 256KB
218.4
392
79%
387
77%
196.87
-10%
194.1
-11%
370 (218 - 522, n=2)
69%
97.6 (2.99 - 590, n=752)
-55%
Sequential Read 256KB
1406
1463
4%
1468
4%
808.76
-42%
792.2
-44%
1411 (1406 - 1416, n=2)
0%
275 (12.1 - 1504, n=752)
-80%
0102030405060Tooltip
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.31.1.5: Ø59.6 (59-60)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.31.1.5: Ø59.6 (48-60)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.7.3a: Ø29.7 (27-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.7.3a: Ø30 (29-31)
Carga Máxima
 48.2 °C45.7 °C41.1 °C 
 46.9 °C45.3 °C41.7 °C 
 46.7 °C45.2 °C41.1 °C 
Máximo: 48.2 °C
Médio: 44.7 °C
37.4 °C41.7 °C44.2 °C
38.4 °C42.2 °C44.1 °C
38.8 °C42.6 °C44.2 °C
Máximo: 44.2 °C
Médio: 41.5 °C
alimentação elétrica  41.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2046.843.92542.542.53134.235.24034.239.25039.240.5632932.18025.826.210024.227.912524.434.416022.64520021.452.525021.458.431519.958.140019.159.550019.462.363018.663.980017.866.8100019.169.9125017.874.7160019.274.920001877.1250017.476.6315016.975.2400016.975500016.967.7630016.962.8800017.268.71000017.270.11250017.266.11600017.359.4SPL71.772.930.185.2N26.627.71.359.2median 18median 66.1Delta1.86.940.242.244.145.434.135.238.141.338.939.5303425.928.825.329.123.236.120.546.220.451.92056.918.658.617.356.217.255.820.263.119.667.616.173.913.978.515.280.815.574.414.56614.266.714.169.515.969.815.368.814.96714.662.514.960.714.757.174.265.528.362.985.62818.11.115.556.2median 15.9median 63.12.46.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnePlus 7TOnePlus 7
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
OnePlus 7T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

OnePlus 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.4 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.4 / 2.9 Watt
Carga midlight 4.7 / 8.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
OnePlus 7T
3800 mAh
OnePlus 7
3700 mAh
OnePlus 7 Pro
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10e
3100 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
21%
-9%
15%
-7%
12%
-38%
10%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.6
33%
0.9
-0%
0.7
22%
0.56
38%
0.6
33%
1.7 (0.9 - 2.1, n=3)
-89%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=782)
2%
Idle Average *
1.4
1.1
21%
1.8
-29%
1
29%
2.99
-114%
1.2
14%
2.47 (1.4 - 3, n=3)
-76%
1.74 (0.6 - 6.2, n=781)
-24%
Idle Maximum *
2.9
2
31%
2.9
-0%
1.3
55%
3.02
-4%
1.5
48%
3.3 (2.9 - 3.5, n=3)
-14%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=782)
30%
Load Average *
4.7
4
15%
5.5
-17%
5.2
-11%
4.17
11%
5.2
-11%
5.1 (4.7 - 5.3, n=3)
-9%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=776)
13%
Load Maximum *
8.3
8
4%
8.2
1%
10
-20%
5.44
34%
10.2
-23%
8.3 (8.3 - 8.3, n=3)
-0%
5.92 (1.2 - 14.2, n=776)
29%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
33h 23min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14h 56min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 07min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 43min
OnePlus 7T
3800 mAh
OnePlus 7
3700 mAh
OnePlus 7 Pro
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10e
3100 mAh
Battery Runtime
-2%
-15%
-9%
12%
-39%
Reader / Idle
2003
1989
-1%
1745
-13%
1768
-12%
2765
38%
1185
-41%
H.264
967
933
-4%
802
-17%
987
2%
1147
19%
795
-18%
WiFi v1.3
896
901
1%
768
-14%
762
-15%
866
-3%
416
-54%
Load
283
278
-2%
236
-17%
249
-12%
267
-6%
164
-42%

Pro

+ Tela de 90-Hz
+ Ótima câmera tripla
+ Chassi elegante e estável
+ Bons alto falantes estéreo
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ GPS preciso
+ Muitas frequências LTE

Contra

- Forte aquecimento sob uso intenso
- Sem microSD
- Não está protegido contra a água e poeira
- O modo de 90-Hz não está habilitado por padrão por muitos jogos

Veredicto – Excelente tecnologia com desvantagens menores

In review: OnePlus 7T. Review device provided by OnePlus Germany.
In review: OnePlus 7T. Review device provided by OnePlus Germany.

A OnePlus deu ao OnePlus 7T uma grande atualização com muitos recursos anteriormente reservados para o modelo Pro. É bom para o comprador porque ele recebe muito por menos dinheiro: Existe a tecnologia de carregamento WarpCharge 30T ainda mais rápida, a melhor câmera, o sofisticado chassi e, claro, acima de tudo, a fantástica tela de 90 Hz, que é uma bênção para as operações diárias do menu. Infelizmente, o OnePlus ainda não usa os 90 Hz nos jogos.

Por um lado, é preciso parabenizar a OnePlus por ousar ignorar recursos como o carregamento sem fio: De acordo com uma entrevista com o fundador, a tecnologia ainda não atende aos requisitos em termos de velocidade e confiabilidade. Ao mesmo tempo, é certamente irritante para alguns usuários que, além do carregamento sem fio, uma certificação IP e expansão de armazenamento via microSD também estejam ausentes.

Existem diferenças no modelo Pro em termos de tela; o OnePlus 7T está na parte inferior da classe alta aqui, e o modelo Pro do ano passado oferece ainda mais quando se trata de resolução e precisão de cores.

O OnePlus 7T é uma ótima oferta na classe alta. Se você não se importa com o carregamento sem fio e a impermeabilização, pode pressionar o gatilho de compra neste smartphone.

No geral, você recebe muito pelo seu dinheiro com o OnePlus 7T. Com seu processo de carregamento extremamente rápido e a tela de 90 Hz, o OnePlus 7T prova ser um companheiro muito agradável na vida cotidiana.

OnePlus 7T - 10/07/2019 v7
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
87%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 89%
Mouse
97%
Conectividade
44 / 70 → 63%
Peso
89%
Bateria
90%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
59 / 64 → 92%
Desempenho da aplicação
76 / 86 → 88%
Temperatura
84%
Ruído
100%
Audio
73 / 90 → 81%
Camera
70%
Médio
79%
86%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone OnePlus 7T: Um grande pacote de melhorias
Florian Schmitt, 2019-10-19 (Update: 2019-10-22)