Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Sharp Aquos D10

Mike Wobker (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 11/15/2018

Sharp photos. O Sharp Aquos D10 está tentando conquistar os corações dos compradores com sua câmera que tem zoom óptico e seu design quase sem marcos. O D10 possui um SoC Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, e câmeras duplas de 12 e 13 MP PDAF. Leia para descobrir se o D10 pode funcionar tão bem quanto parece.

Sharp D10
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 508
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
5.9 polegadas 18:9, 2160 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 55 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 128 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Bússola, Giroscópio, Sensor de proximidade
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900. 3G/UMTS: 850, 900, 1,900, 2,100. 4G LTE Cat.4/FDD: B1, B3, B5, B7, B8, B20., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8 x 148.2 x 74.2
Bateria
2900 mAh Lítio-Ion, Tempo de conversação 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 20 h, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 555 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Um só alto-falantes, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Carregador USB, Cabo USB Type-A para Type-C, Carcaça, adaptador de USB Type-C para conector de 3,5mm, Sharp UI, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR values: Body - 0.944 W/kg, Head - 0.308 W/kg, fanless
peso
165 g, Suprimento de energia: 61 g
Preço
390 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Sharp D10
Sharp D10
Sharp D10

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sharp D10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
336 (min: 287, max: 344) MBit/s ∼100%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
309 MBit/s ∼92% -8%
Sharp Aquos C10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
308 MBit/s ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=306)
211 MBit/s ∼63% -37%
LG Q7 Plus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 64 GB eMMC Flash
42.7 MBit/s ∼13% -87%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
347 MBit/s ∼100% +113%
Sharp Aquos C10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
313 MBit/s ∼90% +92%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=306)
206 MBit/s ∼59% +26%
Sharp D10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
163 (min: 79, max: 172) MBit/s ∼47%
LG Q7 Plus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 64 GB eMMC Flash
54.5 MBit/s ∼16% -67%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø336 (287-344)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø161 (79-172)
GPS test: Sharp D10 - Overview
GPS test: Sharp D10 - Overview
GPS test: Sharp D10 - Loop
GPS test: Sharp D10 - Loop
GPS test: Sharp D10 – Cycling through a grove
GPS test: Sharp D10 – Cycling through a grove
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Cycling through a grove
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Cycling through a grove

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
Our test chart in detail
684
cd/m²
723
cd/m²
750
cd/m²
676
cd/m²
745
cd/m²
757
cd/m²
708
cd/m²
722
cd/m²
738
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 757 cd/m² Médio: 722.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3.27 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 745 cd/m²
Contraste: 1242:1 (Preto: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.52 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.262
Sharp D10
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
LG Q7 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.5
Sharp Aquos C10
IPS, 2040x1080, 5.5
Screen
24%
-22%
-14%
Brightness middle
745
597
-20%
431
-42%
548
-26%
Brightness
723
592
-18%
419
-42%
535
-26%
Brightness Distribution
89
92
3%
89
0%
92
3%
Black Level *
0.6
0.32
47%
0.58
3%
0.49
18%
Contrast
1242
1866
50%
743
-40%
1118
-10%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.52
2.4
47%
6.2
-37%
5.21
-15%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.14
5.3
42%
10.1
-11%
13.47
-47%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.8
3.4
41%
6.2
-7%
6.1
-5%
Gamma
2.262 97%
2.2 100%
2.26 97%
2.228 99%
CCT
7660 85%
7172 91%
8064 81%
7538 86%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2358 Hz ≤ 20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8931 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 31 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Sharp D10
3728 Points ∼26%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3621 Points ∼26% -3%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
14160 Points ∼100% +280%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
13496 Points ∼95% +262%
LG Q7 Plus
2084 Points ∼15% -44%
Sharp Aquos C10
2910 Points ∼21% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (2910 - 3956, n=11)
3714 Points ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=197)
4524 Points ∼32% +21%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sharp D10
4203 Points ∼47%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
4152 Points ∼46% -1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
9014 Points ∼100% +114%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
8849 Points ∼98% +111%
LG Q7 Plus
2135 Points ∼24% -49%
Sharp Aquos C10
2246 Points ∼25% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (883 - 4234, n=12)
3733 Points ∼41% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=247)
4308 Points ∼48% +2%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sharp D10
875 Points ∼36%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
858 Points ∼35% -2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
2457 Points ∼100% +181%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
2425 Points ∼99% +177%
LG Q7 Plus
639 Points ∼26% -27%
Sharp Aquos C10
710 Points ∼29% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (710 - 4210, n=12)
1132 Points ∼46% +29%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=248)
1270 Points ∼52% +45%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Sharp D10
5796 Points ∼55%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5659 Points ∼54% -2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
10571 Points ∼100% +82%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
9971 Points ∼94% +72%
LG Q7 Plus
3969 Points ∼38% -32%
Sharp Aquos C10
5377 Points ∼51% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5083 - 6264, n=12)
5689 Points ∼54% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (6412 - 13531, n=423)
4958 Points ∼47% -14%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sharp D10
1697 Points ∼48%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1756 Points ∼50% +3%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
3515 Points ∼100% +107%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
3512 Points ∼100% +107%
LG Q7 Plus
999 Points ∼28% -41%
Sharp Aquos C10
1674 Points ∼48% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1664 - 1778, n=12)
1714 Points ∼49% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2293 - 4439, n=277)
1709 Points ∼49% +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Sharp D10
806 Points ∼14%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
793 Points ∼14% -2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
5747 Points ∼100% +613%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
5641 Points ∼98% +600%
LG Q7 Plus
316 Points ∼5% -61%
Sharp Aquos C10
767 Points ∼13% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (767 - 809, n=12)
798 Points ∼14% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (869 - 8206, n=277)
1465 Points ∼25% +82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Sharp D10
912 Points ∼18%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
903 Points ∼18% -1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
5036 Points ∼100% +452%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
4971 Points ∼99% +445%
LG Q7 Plus
373 Points ∼7% -59%
Sharp Aquos C10
872 Points ∼17% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (872 - 919, n=12)
905 Points ∼18% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1010 - 5189, n=280)
1360 Points ∼27% +49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sharp D10
1711 Points ∼49%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1744 Points ∼50% +2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
3486 Points ∼100% +104%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
3148 Points ∼90% +84%
LG Q7 Plus
976 Points ∼28% -43%
Sharp Aquos C10
1714 Points ∼49% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1657 - 1819, n=12)
1731 Points ∼50% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=292)
1689 Points ∼48% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Sharp D10
1325 Points ∼16%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1303 Points ∼16% -2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
8352 Points ∼100% +530%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
8291 Points ∼99% +526%
LG Q7 Plus
493 Points ∼6% -63%
Sharp Aquos C10
1244 Points ∼15% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1204 - 1332, n=12)
1302 Points ∼16% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=292)
2068 Points ∼25% +56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Sharp D10
1395 Points ∼22%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1381 Points ∼22% -1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
6375 Points ∼100% +357%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
6083 Points ∼95% +336%
LG Q7 Plus
554 Points ∼9% -60%
Sharp Aquos C10
1325 Points ∼21% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1299 - 1415, n=12)
1379 Points ∼22% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7856, n=293)
1734 Points ∼27% +24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Sharp D10
1755 Points ∼51%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1712 Points ∼49% -2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
3473 Points ∼100% +98%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
3399 Points ∼98% +94%
LG Q7 Plus
1031 Points ∼30% -41%
Sharp Aquos C10
1719 Points ∼49% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1631 - 1822, n=12)
1742 Points ∼50% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2281 - 4216, n=352)
1642 Points ∼47% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Sharp D10
723 Points ∼14%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
718 Points ∼14% -1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
5158 Points ∼100% +613%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
5144 Points ∼100% +611%
LG Q7 Plus
80 Points ∼2% -89%
Sharp Aquos C10
712 Points ∼14% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (707 - 729, n=12)
719 Points ∼14% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (815 - 5241, n=352)
1186 Points ∼23% +64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Sharp D10
832 Points ∼18%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
824 Points ∼18% -1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
4656 Points ∼100% +460%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
4617 Points ∼99% +455%
LG Q7 Plus
101 Points ∼2% -88%
Sharp Aquos C10
819 Points ∼18% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (811 - 839, n=12)
827 Points ∼18% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (951 - 4734, n=360)
1134 Points ∼24% +36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Sharp D10
1743 Points ∼50%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1757 Points ∼50% +1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
3482 Points ∼100% +100%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
3392 Points ∼97% +95%
LG Q7 Plus
1029 Points ∼30% -41%
Sharp Aquos C10
1725 Points ∼50% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1698 - 1816, n=12)
1751 Points ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4215, n=384)
1540 Points ∼44% -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Sharp D10
1269 Points ∼15%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1248 Points ∼15% -2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
8236 Points ∼100% +549%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
8179 Points ∼99% +545%
LG Q7 Plus
96 Points ∼1% -92%
Sharp Aquos C10
1286 Points ∼16% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1234 - 1289, n=12)
1259 Points ∼15% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (46 - 8312, n=384)
1632 Points ∼20% +29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Sharp D10
1351 Points ∼21%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1334 Points ∼21% -1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
6293 Points ∼100% +366%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
6252 Points ∼99% +363%
LG Q7 Plus
120 Points ∼2% -91%
Sharp Aquos C10
1363 Points ∼22% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1318 - 1374, n=12)
1343 Points ∼21% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 6454, n=392)
1387 Points ∼22% +3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sharp D10
13090 Points ∼37%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
13217 Points ∼37% +1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
35290 Points ∼100% +170%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
34665 Points ∼98% +165%
LG Q7 Plus
9903 Points ∼28% -24%
Sharp Aquos C10
12667 Points ∼36% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (12667 - 13217, n=12)
13007 Points ∼37% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=539)
12880 Points ∼36% -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sharp D10
18635 Points ∼22%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
18472 Points ∼22% -1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
84681 Points ∼100% +354%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
80166 Points ∼95% +330%
LG Q7 Plus
9656 Points ∼11% -48%
Sharp Aquos C10
16508 Points ∼19% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (16508 - 18635, n=12)
18313 Points ∼22% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=539)
17994 Points ∼21% -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sharp D10
17032 Points ∼26%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
16972 Points ∼26% 0%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
64592 Points ∼100% +279%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
62063 Points ∼96% +264%
LG Q7 Plus
9710 Points ∼15% -43%
Sharp Aquos C10
15466 Points ∼24% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (15466 - 17032, n=12)
16789 Points ∼26% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=540)
15114 Points ∼23% -11%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sharp D10
30 fps ∼20%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
30 fps ∼20% 0%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
150 fps ∼100% +400%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
149 fps ∼99% +397%
LG Q7 Plus
17 fps ∼11% -43%
Sharp Aquos C10
30 fps ∼20% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (29 - 30, n=12)
29.8 fps ∼20% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=564)
31.4 fps ∼21% +5%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sharp D10
29 fps ∼48%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
28 fps ∼47% -3%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
60 fps ∼100% +107%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
60 fps ∼100% +107%
LG Q7 Plus
16 fps ∼27% -45%
Sharp Aquos C10
30 fps ∼50% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (28 - 31, n=12)
29.5 fps ∼49% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=567)
25 fps ∼42% -14%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sharp D10
13 fps ∼16%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
14 fps ∼17% +8%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
82 fps ∼100% +531%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
80 fps ∼98% +515%
LG Q7 Plus
7.1 fps ∼9% -45%
Sharp Aquos C10
14 fps ∼17% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (13 - 14, n=12)
13.9 fps ∼17% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=486)
16.8 fps ∼20% +29%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sharp D10
14 fps ∼24%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
13 fps ∼22% -7%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
59 fps ∼100% +321%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
55 fps ∼93% +293%
LG Q7 Plus
6.8 fps ∼12% -51%
Sharp Aquos C10
14 fps ∼24% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (13 - 15, n=12)
14 fps ∼24% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=489)
16 fps ∼27% +14%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Sharp D10
9.8 fps ∼16%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
9.8 fps ∼16% 0%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
60 fps ∼100% +512%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
59 fps ∼98% +502%
LG Q7 Plus
4.7 fps ∼8% -52%
Sharp Aquos C10
10 fps ∼17% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.2 - 10, n=12)
9.38 fps ∼16% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 88, n=349)
14.3 fps ∼24% +46%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Sharp D10
9.6 fps ∼18%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
9.3 fps ∼18% -3%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
53 fps ∼100% +452%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
51 fps ∼96% +431%
LG Q7 Plus
4.5 fps ∼8% -53%
Sharp Aquos C10
9.8 fps ∼18% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 11, n=12)
9.49 fps ∼18% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 110, n=352)
13.9 fps ∼26% +45%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Sharp D10
3.2 fps ∼31%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3.1 fps ∼30% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (3.1 - 3.2, n=3)
3.13 fps ∼31% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 59, n=62)
10.2 fps ∼100% +219%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Sharp D10
1.9 fps ∼29%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1.9 fps ∼29% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1.8 - 1.9, n=3)
1.867 fps ∼29% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 31, n=62)
6.49 fps ∼100% +242%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Sharp D10
5.4 fps ∼38%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5.4 fps ∼38% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5 - 5.4, n=3)
5.27 fps ∼37% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (5.7 - 59, n=62)
14.4 fps ∼100% +167%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Sharp D10
5.6 fps ∼36%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5.6 fps ∼36% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5 - 5.6, n=3)
5.4 fps ∼34% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 63, n=61)
15.7 fps ∼100% +180%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Sharp D10
5.5 fps ∼16%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5.6 fps ∼16% +2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
35 fps ∼100% +536%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
35 fps ∼100% +536%
LG Q7 Plus
2.5 fps ∼7% -55%
Sharp Aquos C10
5.6 fps ∼16% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 5.6, n=12)
5.5 fps ∼16% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.3 - 54, n=280)
9.86 fps ∼28% +79%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Sharp D10
5.4 fps ∼17%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5.3 fps ∼17% -2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
31 fps ∼100% +474%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
31 fps ∼100% +474%
LG Q7 Plus
2.4 fps ∼8% -56%
Sharp Aquos C10
6 fps ∼19% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.2 - 6, n=12)
5.58 fps ∼18% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 58, n=283)
8.89 fps ∼29% +65%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sharp D10
90099 Points ∼33%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
89006 Points ∼33% -1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
272546 Points ∼100% +202%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
266374 Points ∼98% +196%
LG Q7 Plus
52855 Points ∼19% -41%
Sharp Aquos C10
89351 Points ∼33% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (87300 - 90674, n=10)
89507 Points ∼33% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=170)
118332 Points ∼43% +31%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sharp D10
72035 Points ∼94%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
70346 Points ∼92% -2%
LG Q7 Plus
44064 Points ∼58% -39%
Sharp Aquos C10
71531 Points ∼94% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (44128 - 73617, n=12)
68642 Points ∼90% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 254229, n=389)
76442 Points ∼100% +6%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Sharp D10
921 Points ∼57%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
936 Points ∼58% +2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
1613 Points ∼100% +75%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
1606 Points ∼100% +74%
LG Q7 Plus
751 Points ∼47% -18%
Sharp Aquos C10
666 Points ∼41% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (666 - 936, n=12)
863 Points ∼54% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=499)
698 Points ∼43% -24%
Graphics (sort by value)
Sharp D10
1495 Points ∼19%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1480 Points ∼19% -1%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
7860 Points ∼100% +426%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
7777 Points ∼99% +420%
LG Q7 Plus
631 Points ∼8% -58%
Sharp Aquos C10
1502 Points ∼19% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1470 - 1523, n=12)
1501 Points ∼19% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=499)
1737 Points ∼22% +16%
Memory (sort by value)
Sharp D10
1235 Points ∼31%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1334 Points ∼34% +8%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
3924 Points ∼100% +218%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
3762 Points ∼96% +205%
LG Q7 Plus
800 Points ∼20% -35%
Sharp Aquos C10
998 Points ∼25% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (838 - 1405, n=12)
1217 Points ∼31% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=499)
1244 Points ∼32% +1%
System (sort by value)
Sharp D10
3298 Points ∼41%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3284 Points ∼41% 0%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
8081 Points ∼100% +145%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
8023 Points ∼99% +143%
LG Q7 Plus
1407 Points ∼17% -57%
Sharp Aquos C10
1763 Points ∼22% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1763 - 3319, n=12)
3147 Points ∼39% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=499)
2512 Points ∼31% -24%
Overall (sort by value)
Sharp D10
1539 Points ∼34%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1570 Points ∼35% +2%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
4478 Points ∼100% +191%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL
4406 Points ∼98% +186%
LG Q7 Plus
855 Points ∼19% -44%
Sharp Aquos C10
1152 Points ∼26% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1152 - 1570, n=12)
1487 Points ∼33% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=503)
1255 Points ∼28% -18%

Legend

 
Sharp D10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
LG Q7 Plus Mediatek MT6750S, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sharp Aquos C10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL (Chrome 68; AI Boost ON)
89.313 Points ∼100% +221%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL (Chrome 68)
88.562 Points ∼99% +218%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=422)
36.7 Points ∼41% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (27.4 - 30.8, n=12)
28.3 Points ∼32% +2%
Sharp Aquos C10 (Chrome 68)
28.27 Points ∼32% +2%
Sharp D10 (Chrome 70)
27.85 Points ∼31%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
27.615 Points ∼31% -1%
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)
18.694 Points ∼21% -33%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL (Chrome 68, AI Boost ON)
16728 Points ∼100% +234%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL (Chrome 68)
16635 Points ∼99% +232%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=558)
5562 Points ∼33% +11%
Sharp Aquos C10 (Chrome 68)
5202 Points ∼31% +4%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
5017 Points ∼30% 0%
Sharp D10 (Chrome 70)
5004 Points ∼30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4398 - 5202, n=12)
4971 Points ∼30% -1%
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)
3422 Points ∼20% -32%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)
13670.9 ms * ∼100% -39%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=578)
11474 ms * ∼84% -17%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
10086 ms * ∼74% -3%
Sharp D10 (Chrome 70)
9807.1 ms * ∼72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (8396 - 10236, n=12)
9656 ms * ∼71% +2%
Sharp Aquos C10 (Chrome 68)
9532.6 ms * ∼70% +3%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL (Chrome 68, AI Boost ON)
2277 ms * ∼17% +77%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL (Chrome 68)
2264 ms * ∼17% +77%

* ... smaller is better

Sharp D10Sony Xperia XA2 PlusLG Q7 PlusSharp Aquos C10Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
1%
-14%
0%
-5%
-26%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.02 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
62.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
60.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
54.3 (14.1 - 74.7, n=68)
-15%
45.5 (3.4 - 87.1, n=318)
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
86.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
81.45 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
73.2 (21.1 - 86.9, n=68)
-12%
63.8 (8.2 - 96.5, n=318)
-23%
Random Write 4KB
16.79
10.5
-37%
11.91
-29%
16.9
1%
19.8 (3.4 - 87.1, n=77)
18%
16.1 (0.14 - 164, n=607)
-4%
Random Read 4KB
47.2
77.43
64%
35.8
-24%
48.2
2%
50.4 (11.4 - 149, n=77)
7%
38.3 (1.59 - 173, n=607)
-19%
Sequential Write 256KB
211.5
146.16
-31%
186.55
-12%
213.4
1%
165 (40 - 246, n=77)
-22%
79.9 (2.99 - 246, n=607)
-62%
Sequential Read 256KB
280.71
281.06
0%
235.9
-16%
283.8
1%
271 (115 - 704, n=77)
-3%
230 (12.1 - 895, n=607)
-18%
Carga Máxima
 33.4 °C32.5 °C33.4 °C 
 33.7 °C32.3 °C32.9 °C 
 33.5 °C32.3 °C32.9 °C 
Máximo: 33.7 °C
Médio: 33 °C
30.2 °C31.8 °C33.4 °C
31.2 °C31.7 °C35 °C
31.2 °C31.9 °C34.6 °C
Máximo: 35 °C
Médio: 32.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  39.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.940.32536.538.33137.241.34037.637.35031.736.26323.826.68024.427.110023.624.312519.92816023.330.920018.438.925018.242.931515.847.740014.655.350015.557.26301358.980012.357.2100012.164.7125011.968.4160010.771.7200010.772.7250010.571.3315010.368.9400010.765.7500010.566.4630010.568.8800010.662.71000010.659.81250010.557.61600010.644.6SPL72.461.552.561.424.180.3N25.514.68.214.50.642.9median 11.9median 58.9Delta3.411.5303836.136.83233.529.427.931.536.327.924.722.121.52223.821.224.421.529.720.340.118.446.417.354.316.760.91760.616.162.915.865.615.870.415.372.115.874.514.971.91573.114.775.514.774.91572.515.173.11573.615.473.61567.116.347.727.684.7159.3median 15.8median 67.11.913.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSharp D10Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Sharp D10 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Sony Xperia XA2 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.7 / 1 / 1.4 Watt
Carga midlight 3.7 / 5.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Sharp D10
2900 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3580 mAh
LG Q7 Plus
3000 mAh
Sharp Aquos C10
2700 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-9%
-29%
-88%
-30%
-32%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
0.35
50%
1
-43%
0.9
-29%
0.733 (0.35 - 1.4, n=12)
-5%
0.88 (0.2 - 3.4, n=636)
-26%
Idle Average *
1
1.81
-81%
1.57
-57%
2.2
-120%
1.808 (1 - 2.31, n=12)
-81%
1.719 (0.6 - 6.2, n=635)
-72%
Idle Maximum *
1.4
1.83
-31%
1.64
-17%
3.8
-171%
2.16 (1.4 - 3.8, n=12)
-54%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=636)
-43%
Load Average *
3.7
3.31
11%
4.1
-11%
6.2
-68%
3.85 (2.82 - 6.2, n=12)
-4%
4.04 (0.8 - 10.8, n=630)
-9%
Load Maximum *
5.2
4.97
4%
6.02
-16%
8
-54%
5.64 (4.56 - 8, n=12)
-8%
5.75 (1.2 - 14.2, n=630)
-11%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 44min
Sharp D10
2900 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3580 mAh
LG Q7 Plus
3000 mAh
Sharp Aquos C10
2700 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
644
837
30%
620
-4%
672
4%

Pro

+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Desempenho sólido do sistema
+ Carcaça robusta
+ Design sem marcos

Contra

- Bluetooth 4.0
- Transições de cores desbotadas com a câmera principal
The Sharp D10 Smartphone Review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.
The Sharp D10 Smartphone Review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.

O Sharp Aquos D10 é um smartphone sólido de gama média que fornece uma boa alternativa para dispositivos de fabricantes mais estabelecidos. O D10 tem um impressionante desempenho de sistema, que não é prejudicado por qualquer bloatware. O SoC Snapdragon 630 e 4 GB de RAM tornam o D10 poderoso o suficiente para lidar com aplicativos modernos exigentes. Os 64 GB de armazenamento interno também devem ser suficientes para a maioria dos usuários

O Sharp Aquos D10 é um smartphone sólido que só desaponta com suas câmeras comparativamente decepcionantes.

A Sharp anuncia o D10 como tendo zoom óptico, mas isso não proporcionou nenhum benefício durante nossos testes. As câmeras duplas traseiras são boas o suficiente para fotos rápidas, mas não poderiam substituir uma câmera compacta dedicada. Em geral, o D10 é um dispositivo decente com um design moderno que é prejudicado por algumas pequenas desvantagens.

Sharp D10 - 11/12/2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
80%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 89%
Mouse
90%
Conectividade
42 / 60 → 70%
Peso
91%
Bateria
93%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
41 / 63 → 65%
Desempenho da aplicação
53 / 70 → 75%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
100%
Audio
54 / 91 → 59%
Camera
80%
Médio
74%
85%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Sharp Aquos D10
Mike Wobker, 2018-11-15 (Update: 2018-11-19)