Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone LG Q7 Plus

Camera AI "QLens." LG's top model in the Q7 line promises users upper mid-range performance, and the new device offers the QLens AI technology otherwise found in LG's premium smartphones. But what will buyers of the LG Q7 Plus really get for their 400 Euros (~$470)? Read our review to find out.
LG Q7 Plus (Q Serie)
Processador
Mediatek MT6750S 8 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A53
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Memória
4 GB 
Pantalha
5.50 polegadas 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 439 PPI, capacitive, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 50 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3.5mm jack, Card Reader: microSD (até 2TB), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade, bússola digital, giroscópio
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (900/1800), 3G WCDMA (B1/B2), LTE (B1, B3, B7, B8, B20, B28, B38), LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.4 x 143.8 x 69.3
Bateria
3000 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix QLens, PDAF, HDR, Low Light mode, autofocus
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix portrait mode
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2 alto-falantes, Teclado: onscreen, Carregador USB, cabo USB Type-C, ferramenta de ejeção do SIM, 24 Meses Garantia, IP68, SAR value (head): 0.357 W/kg, SAR value (body): 1.55 W/kg, fanless
peso
145 g, Suprimento de energia: 63 g
Preço
400 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

LG Q7 Plus
LG Q7 Plus
LG Q7 Plus
LG Q7 Plus
LG Q7 Plus
LG Q7 Plus
LG Q7 Plus
LG Q7 Plus
LG Q7 Plus
LG Q7 Plus
LG Q7 Plus
LG Q7 Plus

Size Comparison

155.8 mm 75.5 mm 8.1 mm 167 g155.4 mm 75.2 mm 7.5 mm 165 g150.7 mm 72.3 mm 8.35 mm 168 g146.7 mm 72.5 mm 7.5 mm 155 g143.8 mm 69.3 mm 8.4 mm 145 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
346 MBit/s +535%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
329 MBit/s +504%
Nubia Z17 mini
Adreno 510, 652 MSM8976, 128 GB eMMC Flash
233 MBit/s +328%
BlackBerry Motion
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
230 MBit/s +322%
LG Q7 Plus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 64 GB eMMC Flash
54.5 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s +781%
BlackBerry Motion
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
345 MBit/s +708%
Nubia Z17 mini
Adreno 510, 652 MSM8976, 128 GB eMMC Flash
341 MBit/s +699%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
334 MBit/s +682%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
281 MBit/s +558%
LG Q7 Plus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 64 GB eMMC Flash
42.7 MBit/s
LG Q7 Plus
LG Q7 Plus
LG Q7 Plus
LG Q7 Plus
LG Q7 Plus
LG Q7 Plus
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
419
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
416
cd/m²
391
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
432
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
430
cd/m²
437
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 437 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 419.4 cd/m² Minimum: 4.71 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 431 cd/m²
Contraste: 743:1 (Preto: 0.58 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
LG Q7 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.50
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
LTPS, 2160x1080, 5.65
Nubia Z17 mini
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20
BlackBerry Motion
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50
Screen
30%
-5%
-2%
39%
Brightness middle
431
675
57%
405
-6%
326
-24%
656
52%
Brightness
419
650
55%
406
-3%
318
-24%
634
51%
Brightness Distribution
89
92
3%
91
2%
94
6%
93
4%
Black Level *
0.58
0.46
21%
0.61
-5%
0.32
45%
0.4
31%
Contrast
743
1467
97%
664
-11%
1019
37%
1640
121%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.2
5.9
5%
6.5
-5%
6.3
-2%
5.3
15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.1
9.5
6%
9.3
8%
11.3
-12%
7.8
23%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.2
6.6
-6%
7.4
-19%
8.8
-42%
5.2
16%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.36 93%
2 110%
2.59 85%
2.22 99%
CCT
8064 81%
7846 83%
8329 78%
8920 73%
7905 82%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.8 ms rise
↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 20.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG Q7 Plus
44064 Points
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
115834 Points +163%
Nubia Z17 mini
87232 Points +98%
BlackBerry Motion
59867 Points +36%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
68282 Points +55%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (44064 - 45829, n=2)
44947 Points +2%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG Q7 Plus
52855 Points
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
140875 Points +167%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
87300 Points +65%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (52855 - 56626, n=2)
54741 Points +4%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
LG Q7 Plus
3969 Points
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
6332 Points +60%
Nubia Z17 mini
6093 Points +54%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
6264 Points +58%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (3969 - 4101, n=2)
4035 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)
15091 Points +280%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
LG Q7 Plus
3080 Points
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
5965 Points +94%
Nubia Z17 mini
4695 Points +52%
BlackBerry Motion
4873 Points +58%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5085 Points +65%
Average Mediatek MT6750S ()
3080 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)
10872 Points +253%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
LG Q7 Plus
855 Points
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2394 Points +180%
Nubia Z17 mini
621 Points -27%
BlackBerry Motion
1116 Points +31%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1513 Points +77%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (855 - 882, n=2)
869 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)
5759 Points +574%
System (sort by value)
LG Q7 Plus
1407 Points
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
5048 Points +259%
Nubia Z17 mini
3829 Points +172%
BlackBerry Motion
2800 Points +99%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3319 Points +136%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (1407 - 1868, n=2)
1638 Points +16%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)
9672 Points +587%
Memory (sort by value)
LG Q7 Plus
800 Points
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2494 Points +212%
Nubia Z17 mini
2150 Points +169%
BlackBerry Motion
773 Points -3%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1380 Points +73%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (778 - 800, n=2)
789 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)
6267 Points +683%
Graphics (sort by value)
LG Q7 Plus
631 Points
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2279 Points +261%
Nubia Z17 mini
1832 Points +190%
BlackBerry Motion
968 Points +53%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1496 Points +137%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (631 - 633, n=2)
632 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)
14220 Points +2154%
Web (sort by value)
LG Q7 Plus
751 Points
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
1146 Points +53%
Nubia Z17 mini
10 Points -99%
BlackBerry Motion
739 Points -2%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
766 Points +2%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (657 - 751, n=2)
704 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)
1495 Points +99%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
LG Q7 Plus
639 Points
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
1579 Points +147%
Nubia Z17 mini
1454 Points +128%
BlackBerry Motion
847 Points +33%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
865 Points +35%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (639 - 653, n=2)
646 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (934 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years)
5228 Points +718%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
LG Q7 Plus
2135 Points
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
5856 Points +174%
Nubia Z17 mini
4612 Points +116%
BlackBerry Motion
3644 Points +71%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
4172 Points +95%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (2135 - 2798, n=2)
2467 Points +16%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years)
14045 Points +558%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
LG Q7 Plus
2084 Points
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
5688 Points +173%
Nubia Z17 mini
4465 Points +114%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3942 Points +89%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (1909 - 2084, n=2)
1997 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 18432, n=72, last 2 years)
10872 Points +422%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
LG Q7 Plus
9710 Points
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
26175 Points +170%
Nubia Z17 mini
18563 Points +91%
BlackBerry Motion
13439 Points +38%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
16841 Points +73%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (9710 - 9905, n=2)
9808 Points +1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
LG Q7 Plus
9656 Points
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
29306 Points +204%
Nubia Z17 mini
23175 Points +140%
BlackBerry Motion
12930 Points +34%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
18386 Points +90%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (9656 - 9864, n=2)
9760 Points +1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG Q7 Plus
9903 Points
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
19050 Points +92%
Nubia Z17 mini
10942 Points +10%
BlackBerry Motion
15584 Points +57%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
13014 Points +31%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (9903 - 10050, n=2)
9977 Points +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
LG Q7 Plus
120 Points
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2059 Points +1616%
Nubia Z17 mini
1507 Points +1156%
BlackBerry Motion
813 Points +578%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1374 Points +1045%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (120 - 123, n=2)
121.5 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)
3766 Points +3038%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
LG Q7 Plus
96 Points
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
1938 Points +1919%
Nubia Z17 mini
1379 Points +1336%
BlackBerry Motion
701 Points +630%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1289 Points +1243%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (96 - 98, n=2)
97 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)
4186 Points +4260%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
LG Q7 Plus
1029 Points
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2638 Points +156%
Nubia Z17 mini
2229 Points +117%
BlackBerry Motion
1850 Points +80%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1785 Points +73%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (1029 - 1172, n=2)
1101 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)
3082 Points +200%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
LG Q7 Plus
101 Points
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
1361 Points +1248%
Nubia Z17 mini
965 Points +855%
BlackBerry Motion
452 Points +348%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
835 Points +727%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (101 - 112, n=2)
106.5 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=106, last 2 years)
2738 Points +2611%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
LG Q7 Plus
80 Points
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
1196 Points +1395%
Nubia Z17 mini
827 Points +934%
BlackBerry Motion
372 Points +365%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
726 Points +808%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (80 - 89, n=2)
84.5 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=106, last 2 years)
2733 Points +3316%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
LG Q7 Plus
1031 Points
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
2628 Points +155%
Nubia Z17 mini
2322 Points +125%
BlackBerry Motion
1807 Points +75%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1751 Points +70%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (1031 - 1172, n=2)
1102 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=106, last 2 years)
3156 Points +206%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
LG Q7 Plus
16 fps
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
51 fps +219%
Nubia Z17 mini
37 fps +131%
BlackBerry Motion
21 fps +31%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
29 fps +81%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (16 - 16, n=2)
16 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)
84.6 fps +429%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
LG Q7 Plus
17 fps
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
46 fps +171%
Nubia Z17 mini
36 fps +112%
BlackBerry Motion
22 fps +29%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
30 fps +76%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (17 - 17, n=2)
17 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)
247 fps +1353%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG Q7 Plus
6.8 fps
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
22 fps +224%
Nubia Z17 mini
17 fps +150%
BlackBerry Motion
9.5 fps +40%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
14 fps +106%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (6.7 - 6.8, n=2)
6.75 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)
72.2 fps +962%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
LG Q7 Plus
7.1 fps
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
23 fps +224%
Nubia Z17 mini
17 fps +139%
BlackBerry Motion
9.3 fps +31%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
14 fps +97%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (7.1 - 7.1, n=2)
7.1 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years)
140.6 fps +1880%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
LG Q7 Plus
4.5 fps
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
14 fps +211%
Nubia Z17 mini
11 fps +144%
BlackBerry Motion
6.1 fps +36%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.5 fps +111%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (4.5 - 4.5, n=2)
4.5 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)
60.9 fps +1253%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
LG Q7 Plus
4.7 fps
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
15 fps +219%
Nubia Z17 mini
10 fps +113%
BlackBerry Motion
6.3 fps +34%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.7 fps +106%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (4.7 - 4.7, n=2)
4.7 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)
99 fps +2006%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
LG Q7 Plus
2.4 fps
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
8.6 fps +258%
Nubia Z17 mini
6 fps +150%
BlackBerry Motion
3.4 fps +42%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5.3 fps +121%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (2.4 - 2.4, n=2)
2.4 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)
43.4 fps +1708%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
LG Q7 Plus
2.5 fps
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
9.1 fps +264%
Nubia Z17 mini
6 fps +140%
BlackBerry Motion
3.4 fps +36%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5.3 fps +112%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (2.5 - 2.5, n=2)
2.5 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)
59.9 fps +2296%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.81 fps
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
190 Points
Average of class Smartphone (177 - 6114, n=58, last 2 years)
2240 Points

Legend

 
LG Q7 Plus Mediatek MT6750S, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nubia Z17 mini Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976, Qualcomm Adreno 510, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
BlackBerry Motion Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)
104.3 Points +458%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
49.4 Points +164%
Nubia Z17 mini (Chrome 63)
45.1 Points +141%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
28.09 Points +50%
BlackBerry Motion
27.19 Points +45%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (18.7 - 19.2, n=2)
18.9 Points +1%
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)
18.69 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years)
33357 Points +875%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
9582 Points +180%
Nubia Z17 mini (Chrome 63)
9187 Points +168%
BlackBerry Motion
4409 Points +29%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
4398 Points +29%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (3422 - 3474, n=2)
3448 Points +1%
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)
3422 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)
13671 ms *
Average Mediatek MT6750S (13203 - 13671, n=2)
13437 ms * +2%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
9425 ms * +31%
BlackBerry Motion
9316 ms * +32%
Nubia Z17 mini (Chrome 63)
4411 ms * +68%
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
4094 ms * +70%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * +88%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro (Chrome 67)
159 Points +127%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
95 Points +36%
Average Mediatek MT6750S (70 - 71, n=2)
70.5 Points +1%
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)
70 Points

* ... smaller is better

LG Q7 PlusBQ Aquaris X2 ProNubia Z17 miniBlackBerry MotionAsus ZenFone 4 ZE554KLAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
17%
14%
10%
17%
39%
953%
Sequential Read 256KB
235.9
280.8
19%
267
13%
285.5
21%
287.4
22%
Sequential Write 256KB
186.6
204.8
10%
143.8
-23%
92.7
-50%
205.3
10%
176.8 ?(40 - 274, n=201)
-5%
Random Read 4KB
35.8
51.3
43%
60
68%
67.3
88%
68.6
92%
Random Write 4KB
11.91
15.43
30%
15.9
34%
11.61
-3%
7.59
-36%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
81.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
78 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
84.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
86.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
61.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
58.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
61.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
66.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
Arena of Valor
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 min23 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 very low27 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Carga Máxima
 37.2 °C37 °C37.7 °C 
 37.5 °C36.8 °C37.5 °C 
 38.1 °C38.1 °C37.6 °C 
Máximo: 38.1 °C
Médio: 37.5 °C
33.1 °C34.8 °C34.7 °C
33.6 °C37.1 °C34.9 °C
34.2 °C38.1 °C37.9 °C
Máximo: 38.1 °C
Médio: 35.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  26.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.928.62528.436.33136.128.54030.928.85030.6326322.228.38024.919.610024.42212523.523.516020.319.920019.823.925018.229.831517.441.240016.649.950017.154.163015.95880015.969.3100015.969.1125016.772.716001673.2200015.969250016.274315016.475.940001780.3500016.573.1630016.466.8800016.665.9100001772.21250016.563.61600016.947.5SPL28.685.5N1.157median 16.6median 65.9Delta0.915.733.929.528.437.736.130.530.929.230.63222.225.624.922.324.422.723.52720.327.719.845.718.249.217.458.216.661.917.16215.961.315.957.115.963.616.773.31674.515.970.916.272.816.471.51774.116.573.316.468.416.665.61765.316.55716.949.228.683.21.151.8median 16.6median 620.99.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLG Q7 PlusBQ Aquaris X2 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
LG Q7 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

BQ Aquaris X2 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.16 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1 / 1.57 / 1.64 Watt
Carga midlight 4.1 / 6.02 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
LG Q7 Plus
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
3100 mAh
Nubia Z17 mini
2950 mAh
BlackBerry Motion
4000 mAh
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3300 mAh
Average Mediatek MT6750S
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-15%
-28%
-18%
-19%
5%
-11%
Idle Minimum *
1
0.63
37%
0.83
17%
1.45
-45%
0.84
16%
0.845 ?(0.69 - 1, n=2)
15%
Idle Average *
1.57
2.16
-38%
2.01
-28%
2.1
-34%
2.31
-47%
1.635 ?(1.57 - 1.7, n=2)
-4%
Idle Maximum *
1.64
2.18
-33%
2.02
-23%
2.13
-30%
2.33
-42%
1.685 ?(1.64 - 1.73, n=2)
-3%
Load Average *
4.1
4.48
-9%
5.95
-45%
4.01
2%
4.76
-16%
3.66 ?(3.21 - 4.1, n=2)
11%
Load Maximum *
6.02
7.87
-31%
9.65
-60%
5.09
15%
6.39
-6%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
16h 20min
WiFi Websurfing
10h 20min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
7h 35min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 50min
LG Q7 Plus
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X2 Pro
3100 mAh
Nubia Z17 mini
2950 mAh
BlackBerry Motion
4000 mAh
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
12%
-20%
31%
35%
Reader / Idle
980
1374
40%
1665
70%
H.264
455
658
45%
698
53%
WiFi v1.3
620
605
-2%
497
-20%
810
31%
562
-9%
Load
230
145
-37%
286
24%

Pro

+ Muito boa qualidade de áudio via conector de 3,5 mm
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ IP68 à prova de poeira e água

Contra

- Desempenho do sistema
- Velocidade do WLAN
- Tela de baixo contraste

LG Q7 Plus - 07/30/2018 v6(old)
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
82%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
38 / 60 → 64%
Peso
93%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
83%
Desempenho do jogos
14 / 63 → 23%
Desempenho da aplicação
40 / 70 → 57%
Temperatura
90%
Ruído
100%
Audio
76 / 91 → 83%
Camera
64%
Médio
71%
81%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone LG Q7 Plus
Mike Wobker, 2018-08- 7 (Update: 2018-08-11)