Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia XA2 Plus

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 10/03/2018

Smaller bezels, larger display. Depois do XA2 regular e sua versão Ultra, mais poderosa, os compradores interessados agora podem escolher entre três modelos XA2. O design foi atualizado ligeiramente, agora oferecendo marcos menores, bem como uma tela de 6 polegadas no formato 18:9. Nós esclarecemos em nossa análise, o que mais o Sony XA2 Plus pode fazer.

Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Xperia Serie)
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 508
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
6 polegadas 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 20 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD (FAT, FAT32 e exFAT, até 400 GB), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: sensor de aceleração, sensor de proximidade, bússola
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (1/2/5/8), LTE (1/2/3/5/7/8/20/38), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.6 x 157 x 75
Bateria
3580 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 23 MPix f/2.0
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.4
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 1 alto-falante, Teclado: onscreen, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Carregador USB, cabo USB Type-C, fones estéreo, Movie Creator, Xperia Lounge, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR value (head): 1.9 W/kg, SAR value (body): 1.44 W/kg, fanless
peso
204 g, Suprimento de energia: 55 g
Preço
399 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
675 (min: 630, max: 704) MBit/s ∼100% +118%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
334 MBit/s ∼49% +8%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
309 MBit/s ∼46%
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
247 MBit/s ∼37% -20%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
210 MBit/s ∼31% -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=297)
205 MBit/s ∼30% -34%
LG Q7 Plus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 64 GB eMMC Flash
42.7 MBit/s ∼6% -86%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
647 (min: 598, max: 665) MBit/s ∼100% +86%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
347 MBit/s ∼54%
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
307 MBit/s ∼47% -12%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
305 MBit/s ∼47% -12%
Honor 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
236 MBit/s ∼36% -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=297)
200 MBit/s ∼31% -42%
LG Q7 Plus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 64 GB eMMC Flash
54.5 MBit/s ∼8% -84%
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
GPS Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
GPS Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
GPS Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
GPS Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
GPS Sony Xperia XA2 Plus

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus Test chart
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus Test chart (detail)
577
cd/m²
601
cd/m²
620
cd/m²
587
cd/m²
597
cd/m²
605
cd/m²
576
cd/m²
572
cd/m²
596
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 620 cd/m² Médio: 592.3 cd/m² Minimum: 5.17 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 597 cd/m²
Contraste: 1866:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
95.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Honor 10
IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18
LG Q7 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.5
Nokia 7 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
IPS, 1920x1080, 6
Screen
-11%
-23%
-67%
-18%
-15%
Brightness middle
597
555
-7%
489
-18%
431
-28%
458
-23%
659
10%
Brightness
592
537
-9%
486
-18%
419
-29%
463
-22%
680
15%
Brightness Distribution
92
94
2%
93
1%
89
-3%
92
0%
88
-4%
Black Level *
0.32
0.39
-22%
0.34
-6%
0.58
-81%
0.22
31%
0.56
-75%
Contrast
1866
1423
-24%
1438
-23%
743
-60%
2082
12%
1177
-37%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.4
2.3
4%
3.8
-58%
6.2
-158%
4
-67%
2.8
-17%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.3
6
-13%
7.1
-34%
10.1
-91%
7.4
-40%
6.5
-23%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.4
3.9
-15%
4.4
-29%
6.2
-82%
4.7
-38%
3
12%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.19 100%
2.22 99%
2.26 97%
2.19 100%
2.18 101%
CCT
7172 91%
6212 105%
7213 90%
8064 81%
7425 88%
6938 94%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2358 Hz ≤ 4 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 4 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8773 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.8 ms rise
↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26.8 ms rise
↘ 30 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
70346 Points ∼31%
Honor 10
174272 Points ∼77% +148%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
227026 Points ∼100% +223%
LG Q7 Plus
44064 Points ∼19% -37%
Nokia 7 Plus
117165 Points ∼52% +67%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
70141 Points ∼31% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (44128 - 73617, n=12)
68642 Points ∼30% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 250848, n=382)
74754 Points ∼33% +6%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
89006 Points ∼34%
Honor 10
205297 Points ∼78% +131%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
263165 Points ∼100% +196%
LG Q7 Plus
52855 Points ∼20% -41%
Nokia 7 Plus
141701 Points ∼54% +59%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
89349 Points ∼34% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (87300 - 90674, n=10)
89507 Points ∼34% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=162)
115755 Points ∼44% +30%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
4953 Points ∼61%
Honor 10
7046 Points ∼87% +42%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
8101 Points ∼100% +64%
LG Q7 Plus
3080 Points ∼38% -38%
Nokia 7 Plus
6077 Points ∼75% +23%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
5051 Points ∼62% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4636 - 5085, n=11)
4876 Points ∼60% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2829 - 9868, n=244)
4496 Points ∼55% -9%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5659 Points ∼59%
Honor 10
8530 Points ∼88% +51%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
9664 Points ∼100% +71%
LG Q7 Plus
3969 Points ∼41% -30%
Nokia 7 Plus
6825 Points ∼71% +21%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
5083 Points ∼53% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5083 - 6264, n=12)
5689 Points ∼59% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (3681 - 13211, n=412)
4894 Points ∼51% -14%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
936 Points ∼71%
Honor 10
1316 Points ∼100% +41%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
1296 Points ∼98% +38%
LG Q7 Plus
751 Points ∼57% -20%
Nokia 7 Plus
1101 Points ∼84% +18%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
912 Points ∼69% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (666 - 936, n=12)
863 Points ∼66% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=488)
691 Points ∼53% -26%
Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1480 Points ∼19%
Honor 10
4397 Points ∼55% +197%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
7945 Points ∼100% +437%
LG Q7 Plus
631 Points ∼8% -57%
Nokia 7 Plus
2298 Points ∼29% +55%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
1492 Points ∼19% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1470 - 1523, n=12)
1501 Points ∼19% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=488)
1687 Points ∼21% +14%
Memory (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1334 Points ∼35%
Honor 10
3808 Points ∼100% +185%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
3239 Points ∼85% +143%
LG Q7 Plus
800 Points ∼21% -40%
Nokia 7 Plus
2503 Points ∼66% +88%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
1325 Points ∼35% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (838 - 1405, n=12)
1217 Points ∼32% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=488)
1213 Points ∼32% -9%
System (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3284 Points ∼50%
Honor 10
5882 Points ∼90% +79%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
6506 Points ∼100% +98%
LG Q7 Plus
1407 Points ∼22% -57%
Nokia 7 Plus
4976 Points ∼76% +52%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
3287 Points ∼51% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1763 - 3319, n=12)
3147 Points ∼48% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=488)
2453 Points ∼38% -25%
Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1570 Points ∼41%
Honor 10
3374 Points ∼88% +115%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
3838 Points ∼100% +144%
LG Q7 Plus
855 Points ∼22% -46%
Nokia 7 Plus
2369 Points ∼62% +51%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
1560 Points ∼41% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1152 - 1570, n=12)
1487 Points ∼39% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=492)
1225 Points ∼32% -22%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3621 Points ∼25%
Honor 10
8634 Points ∼60% +138%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
14369 Points ∼100% +297%
LG Q7 Plus
2084 Points ∼15% -42%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
3738 Points ∼26% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (2910 - 3956, n=11)
3714 Points ∼26% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=186)
4418 Points ∼31% +22%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
4152 Points ∼45%
Honor 10
6610 Points ∼72% +59%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
9182 Points ∼100% +121%
LG Q7 Plus
2135 Points ∼23% -49%
Nokia 7 Plus
5867 Points ∼64% +41%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
4234 Points ∼46% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (883 - 4234, n=12)
3733 Points ∼41% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=235)
4232 Points ∼46% +2%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
858 Points ∼35%
Honor 10
1890 Points ∼77% +120%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
2468 Points ∼100% +188%
LG Q7 Plus
639 Points ∼26% -26%
Nokia 7 Plus
1646 Points ∼67% +92%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
865 Points ∼35% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (710 - 4210, n=12)
1132 Points ∼46% +32%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=236)
1249 Points ∼51% +46%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1712 Points ∼62%
Honor 10
2582 Points ∼94% +51%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
2528 Points ∼92% +48%
LG Q7 Plus
1031 Points ∼38% -40%
Nokia 7 Plus
2749 Points ∼100% +61%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
1706 Points ∼62% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1631 - 1822, n=12)
1742 Points ∼63% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (549 - 4183, n=342)
1631 Points ∼59% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
718 Points ∼15%
Honor 10
2993 Points ∼63% +317%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4746 Points ∼100% +561%
LG Q7 Plus
80 Points ∼2% -89%
Nokia 7 Plus
1161 Points ∼24% +62%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
727 Points ∼15% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (707 - 729, n=12)
719 Points ∼15% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (69 - 5241, n=342)
1172 Points ∼25% +63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
824 Points ∼21%
Honor 10
2891 Points ∼73% +251%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
3972 Points ∼100% +382%
LG Q7 Plus
101 Points ∼3% -88%
Nokia 7 Plus
1332 Points ∼34% +62%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
833 Points ∼21% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (811 - 839, n=12)
827 Points ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (86 - 4734, n=350)
1120 Points ∼28% +36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1757 Points ∼63%
Honor 10
2773 Points ∼100% +58%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
2720 Points ∼98% +55%
LG Q7 Plus
1029 Points ∼37% -41%
Nokia 7 Plus
2734 Points ∼99% +56%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
1698 Points ∼61% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1698 - 1816, n=12)
1751 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4150, n=373)
1519 Points ∼55% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1248 Points ∼15%
Honor 10
3573 Points ∼43% +186%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
8261 Points ∼100% +562%
LG Q7 Plus
96 Points ∼1% -92%
Nokia 7 Plus
1895 Points ∼23% +52%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
1256 Points ∼15% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1234 - 1289, n=12)
1259 Points ∼15% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 8312, n=373)
1589 Points ∼19% +27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
1334 Points ∼23%
Honor 10
3358 Points ∼59% +152%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
5687 Points ∼100% +326%
LG Q7 Plus
120 Points ∼2% -91%
Nokia 7 Plus
2035 Points ∼36% +53%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
1333 Points ∼23% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1318 - 1374, n=12)
1343 Points ∼24% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (69 - 6378, n=381)
1353 Points ∼24% +1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
13217 Points ∼38%
Honor 10
21070 Points ∼60% +59%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
34928 Points ∼100% +164%
LG Q7 Plus
9903 Points ∼28% -25%
Nokia 7 Plus
20085 Points ∼58% +52%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
13054 Points ∼37% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (12667 - 13217, n=12)
13007 Points ∼37% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 36794, n=527)
12686 Points ∼36% -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
18472 Points ∼22%
Honor 10
32674 Points ∼40% +77%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
82125 Points ∼100% +345%
LG Q7 Plus
9656 Points ∼12% -48%
Nokia 7 Plus
29333 Points ∼36% +59%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
18528 Points ∼23% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (16508 - 18635, n=12)
18313 Points ∼22% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=527)
17520 Points ∼21% -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
16972 Points ∼27%
Honor 10
29111 Points ∼46% +72%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
63159 Points ∼100% +272%
LG Q7 Plus
9710 Points ∼15% -43%
Nokia 7 Plus
26610 Points ∼42% +57%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
16949 Points ∼27% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (15466 - 17032, n=12)
16789 Points ∼27% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=528)
14743 Points ∼23% -13%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
30 fps ∼20%
Honor 10
124 fps ∼83% +313%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
150 fps ∼100% +400%
LG Q7 Plus
17 fps ∼11% -43%
Nokia 7 Plus
50 fps ∼33% +67%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
29 fps ∼19% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (29 - 30, n=12)
29.8 fps ∼20% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=551)
30.2 fps ∼20% +1%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
28 fps ∼47%
Honor 10
59 fps ∼98% +111%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
60 fps ∼100% +114%
LG Q7 Plus
16 fps ∼27% -43%
Nokia 7 Plus
48 fps ∼80% +71%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
31 fps ∼52% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (28 - 31, n=12)
29.5 fps ∼49% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=554)
24.4 fps ∼41% -13%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
14 fps ∼20%
Honor 10
59 fps ∼83% +321%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
71 fps ∼100% +407%
LG Q7 Plus
7.1 fps ∼10% -49%
Nokia 7 Plus
23 fps ∼32% +64%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
14 fps ∼20% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (13 - 14, n=12)
13.9 fps ∼20% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=473)
16.2 fps ∼23% +16%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
13 fps ∼22%
Honor 10
50 fps ∼86% +285%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
58 fps ∼100% +346%
LG Q7 Plus
6.8 fps ∼12% -48%
Nokia 7 Plus
22 fps ∼38% +69%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
15 fps ∼26% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (13 - 15, n=12)
14 fps ∼24% +8%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=476)
15.5 fps ∼27% +19%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
9.8 fps ∼25%
Honor 10
39 fps ∼100% +298%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
35 fps ∼90% +257%
LG Q7 Plus
4.7 fps ∼12% -52%
Nokia 7 Plus
14 fps ∼36% +43%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
5.2 fps ∼13% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.2 - 10, n=12)
9.38 fps ∼24% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 88, n=336)
13.8 fps ∼35% +41%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
9.3 fps ∼17%
Honor 10
34 fps ∼63% +266%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
54 fps ∼100% +481%
LG Q7 Plus
4.5 fps ∼8% -52%
Nokia 7 Plus
15 fps ∼28% +61%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
11 fps ∼20% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 11, n=12)
9.49 fps ∼18% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 110, n=339)
13.5 fps ∼25% +45%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5.6 fps ∼16%
Honor 10
23 fps ∼66% +311%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
35 fps ∼100% +525%
LG Q7 Plus
2.5 fps ∼7% -55%
Nokia 7 Plus
8.3 fps ∼24% +48%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
5.5 fps ∼16% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 5.6, n=12)
5.5 fps ∼16% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.72 - 54, n=268)
9.6 fps ∼27% +71%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
5.3 fps ∼16%
Honor 10
20 fps ∼61% +277%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
33 fps ∼100% +523%
LG Q7 Plus
2.4 fps ∼7% -55%
Nokia 7 Plus
9.1 fps ∼28% +72%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
6 fps ∼18% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.2 - 6, n=12)
5.58 fps ∼17% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 58, n=271)
8.67 fps ∼26% +64%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
15.07 fps ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
9.81 fps ∼65%
Average of class Smartphone (1.06 - 38.7, n=72)
12.1 fps ∼80%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Nokia 7 Plus
349 Points ∼50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
190 Points ∼27%
Average of class Smartphone (36.3 - 2754, n=75)
701 Points ∼100%

Legend

 
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
LG Q7 Plus Mediatek MT6750S, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
75.959 Points ∼100% +175%
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)
56.506 Points ∼74% +105%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
53.89 Points ∼71% +95%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=410)
36.2 Points ∼48% +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (27.4 - 30.8, n=12)
28.3 Points ∼37% +2%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65)
28.107 Points ∼37% +2%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
27.615 Points ∼36%
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)
18.694 Points ∼25% -32%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
14514 Points ∼100% +189%
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)
10965 Points ∼76% +119%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
10945 Points ∼75% +118%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=547)
5468 Points ∼38% +9%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65)
5052 Points ∼35% +1%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
5017 Points ∼35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4398 - 5202, n=12)
4971 Points ∼34% -1%
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)
3422 Points ∼24% -32%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)
13670.9 ms * ∼100% -36%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=567)
11574 ms * ∼85% -15%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
10086 ms * ∼74%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65)
9823.3 ms * ∼72% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (8396 - 10236, n=12)
9656 ms * ∼71% +4%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
3937.3 ms * ∼29% +61%
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)
3899 ms * ∼29% +61%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
2713.6 ms * ∼20% +73%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
223 Points ∼100% +110%
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)
182 Points ∼82% +72%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
168 Points ∼75% +58%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65)
110 Points ∼49% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=276)
108 Points ∼48% +2%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
106 Points ∼48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (86 - 117, n=10)
106 Points ∼48% 0%
LG Q7 Plus (Chrome 67)
70 Points ∼31% -34%

* ... smaller is better

Sony Xperia XA2 PlusHonor 10Xiaomi Pocophone F1LG Q7 PlusNokia 7 PlusSony Xperia XA2 UltraAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
441%
42%
-7%
16%
-3%
-14%
-22%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
67.02 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
65.58 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
62.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
62.31
-7%
63.31 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
47.1 (3.4 - 87.1, n=111)
-30%
45.2 (3.4 - 87.1, n=313)
-33%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
86.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
85.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
81.45 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
82.21
-4%
85.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
66.3 (8.2 - 96.5, n=111)
-23%
63.5 (8.2 - 96.5, n=313)
-26%
Random Write 4KB
10.5
163
1452%
17.81
70%
11.91
13%
19.62
87%
10.1
-4%
18.6 (0.75 - 77.3, n=148)
77%
15.4 (0.14 - 164, n=595)
47%
Random Read 4KB
77.43
145.88
88%
101.01
30%
35.8
-54%
54.65
-29%
76
-2%
36.2 (3.59 - 117, n=148)
-53%
37.4 (1.59 - 173, n=596)
-52%
Sequential Write 256KB
146.16
192.12
31%
155.57
6%
186.55
28%
211.6
45%
138.8
-5%
94.4 (14.8 - 189, n=148)
-35%
78.5 (2.99 - 246, n=596)
-46%
Sequential Read 256KB
281.06
827.69
194%
705.38
151%
235.9
-16%
283.12
1%
273.7
-3%
229 (25.8 - 440, n=148)
-19%
226 (12.1 - 895, n=596)
-20%
Arena of Valor
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 min31 fps
 high HD30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Asphalt 9: Legends
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 High Quality28 fps
 Standard / low30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Carga Máxima
 33.6 °C33.9 °C33.5 °C 
 33.9 °C33.2 °C33.5 °C 
 33.3 °C33.4 °C33.1 °C 
Máximo: 33.9 °C
Médio: 33.5 °C
30.4 °C30.5 °C31.1 °C
30.5 °C30.7 °C32.8 °C
29.8 °C30.9 °C32.3 °C
Máximo: 32.8 °C
Médio: 31 °C
alimentação elétrica  28.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the bottom side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22 to 326 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030382536.136.8313233.54029.427.95031.536.36327.924.78022.121.51002223.812521.224.416021.529.720020.340.125018.446.431517.354.340016.760.95001760.663016.162.980015.865.6100015.870.4125015.372.1160015.874.5200014.971.925001573.1315014.775.5400014.774.950001572.5630015.173.180001573.61000015.473.6125001567.11600016.347.7SPL27.684.7N159.3median 15.8median 67.1Delta1.913.135.244.432.941.737.232.531.737.339.641.828.335.827.335.926.934.126.7362439.920.944.820.952.219.550.118.554.117.564.817.561.815.769.215.873.816.675.115.874.115.474.115.574.71675.915.8741672.216.374.316.371.916.268.216.456.416.452.128.685.31.161.3median 16.4median 68.22.111.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSony Xperia XA2 PlusNokia 7 Plus
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Nokia 7 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.16 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.35 / 1.81 / 1.83 Watt
Carga midlight 3.31 / 4.97 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3580 mAh
Honor 10
3400 mAh
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4000 mAh
LG Q7 Plus
3000 mAh
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
3580 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-77%
-43%
-42%
-40%
-44%
-31%
-39%
Idle Minimum *
0.35
1.12
-220%
0.65
-86%
1
-186%
0.65
-86%
0.77
-120%
0.733 (0.35 - 1.4, n=12)
-109%
0.883 (0.2 - 3.4, n=630)
-152%
Idle Average *
1.81
2.26
-25%
1.97
-9%
1.57
13%
1.76
3%
2.12
-17%
1.808 (1 - 2.31, n=12)
-0%
1.723 (0.6 - 6.2, n=629)
5%
Idle Maximum *
1.83
2.3
-26%
2.01
-10%
1.64
10%
1.78
3%
2.17
-19%
2.16 (1.4 - 3.8, n=12)
-18%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=630)
-9%
Load Average *
3.31
5.14
-55%
4.29
-30%
4.1
-24%
4.47
-35%
4.3
-30%
3.85 (2.82 - 6.2, n=12)
-16%
4.03 (0.8 - 10.8, n=624)
-22%
Load Maximum *
4.97
7.89
-59%
9.05
-82%
6.02
-21%
9.13
-84%
6.73
-35%
5.64 (4.56 - 8, n=12)
-13%
5.73 (1.2 - 14.2, n=624)
-15%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
78h 02min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13h 57min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 53min
Carga (máximo brilho)
8h 49min
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3580 mAh
Honor 10
3400 mAh
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4000 mAh
LG Q7 Plus
3000 mAh
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
3580 mAh
Battery Runtime
-45%
-28%
-53%
-44%
-30%
Reader / Idle
4682
1162
-75%
2088
-55%
980
-79%
1703
-64%
1788
-62%
H.264
893
662
-26%
936
5%
455
-49%
706
-21%
876
-2%
WiFi v1.3
837
663
-21%
808
-3%
620
-26%
672
-20%
849
1%
Load
529
216
-59%
220
-58%
230
-57%
158
-70%
238
-55%

Pro

+ Bom alto falante
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Carcaça robusta
+ Slot dual SIM / microSD pode ser aberto em uma ferramenta
+ Tela de alto contraste

Contra

- Armazenamento interno
- As vozes soam abafadas durante as conversas
- Desempenho medíocre do sistema
Testing the Sony Xperia XA2 Plus. Test unit provided by Sony Germany
Testing the Sony Xperia XA2 Plus. Test unit provided by Sony Germany

Em nosso teste, o Xperia XA2 Plus apresenta bom desempenho, embora o desempenho do sistema permaneça abaixo do dos dispositivos em um nível de preço similar. Embora o desempenho de armazenamento também seja um pouco baixo, é possível manter o nível de smartphones comparáveis. Além disso, há uma porta USB-2.0 lenta e o desempenho da câmera principal de 23 MP está abaixo da média, principalmente em condições de iluminação irregulares.

O Xperia XA2 Plus se recomenda para os compradores interessados em smartphones da Sony que preferem o pequeno design do formato 18: 9 e que não se importam muito com um sistema de câmera dupla.

No lado positivo, há uma excelente duração de bateria e uma tela agradável, rica em contraste. Os resultados nos benchmarks dificilmente representam algo significativo no uso diário, onde o smartphone da Sony apresenta uma interface de usuário fluida e os aplicativos rodam sem problemas. Jogos exigentes podem ser bem jogados com configurações médias, e o Bluetooth 5.0 está presente. Para muitos outros fabricantes, isso ainda não é o padrão. O Xperia XA2 Plus é, portanto, recomendado para todos aqueles que não precisam das câmeras duplas do XA2 Ultra e preferem o formato 18: 9 mais fino.

Sony Xperia XA2 Plus - 09/30/2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
86%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 89%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
49 / 60 → 81%
Peso
88%
Bateria
96%
Pantalha
89%
Desempenho do jogos
42 / 63 → 66%
Desempenho da aplicação
53 / 70 → 75%
Temperatura
93%
Ruído
100%
Audio
62 / 91 → 68%
Camera
72%
Médio
76%
85%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Mike Wobker, 2018-10- 3 (Update: 2018-10-10)