Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi 8

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 03/14/2019

Mimimi? O smartphone topo de gama Xiaomi Mi 8 de 2018 está mais do que ultrapassado, e ainda tem muito para oferecer a um preço muito baixo. Hora de descobrir como ele se compara aos atuais smartphones premium.

Xiaomi Mi 8 (Mi Serie)
Placa gráfica
Memória
6144 MB 
Pantalha
6.21 polegadas 18.75:9, 2248 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, HDR10, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 115 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Áudio via USB-C, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, barômetro, Detecção facial (infravermelho), USB-C (OTG)
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1,800/​1,900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8/​B34/​B39), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B20/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.6 x 154.9 x 74.8
Bateria
12.9 Wh, 3400 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Quick Charge
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix f/1.8, phase detection autofocus (dual pixel), OIS, dual LED flash, videos @2160p/30fps (camera 1); 12.0 MP, f/2.4, depth of field, tele lens (camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix Videos @1080p/​30fps
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono no lado inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Fonte de alimentação, cabo USB, Ferramenta SIM, protetor de silicone, adaptador USB-C para 3.5 mm, MIUI, Cleanup, Mi Drop, 24 Meses Garantia, A-GPS (L1/​L5), GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo (E1/​E5a), QZSS (L1/​L5); SAR: 0.701W/​kg (head), 1.662W/​kg (body);notification LED; LTE-Cat 16 (1,015 Mbit/s Download, 100 Mbit/s Upload), fanless
peso
175 g, Suprimento de energia: 65 g
Preço
419 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Xiaomi Mi 8
Xiaomi Mi 8
Xiaomi Mi 8
Xiaomi Mi 8
Xiaomi Mi 8
Xiaomi Mi 8
Xiaomi Mi 8
Xiaomi Mi 8

Size Comparison

158 mm 73 mm 9.9 mm 193 g157.5 mm 74.8 mm 8.2 mm 185 g154.9 mm 74.8 mm 7.6 mm 175 g154.9 mm 74.8 mm 7.6 mm 175 g147.7 mm 68.7 mm 8.5 mm 163 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
652 MBit/s ∼100% +33%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
629 (min: 621, max: 638) MBit/s ∼96% +28%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
624 (min: 593, max: 636) MBit/s ∼96% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 MBit/s ∼94% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
491 (min: 444, max: 499) MBit/s ∼75%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=381)
221 MBit/s ∼34% -55%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 MBit/s ∼100% +43%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
519 MBit/s ∼84% +21%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
484 (min: 382, max: 499) MBit/s ∼79% +13%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
474 (min: 241, max: 497) MBit/s ∼77% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
429 (min: 256, max: 448) MBit/s ∼70%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=381)
212 MBit/s ∼34% -51%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø490 (444-499)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø429 (256-448)
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – roundabout
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – roundabout
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overpass
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overpass
GPS Xiaomi Mi 8 – overview
GPS Xiaomi Mi 8 – overview
GPS Xiaomi Mi 8 – roundabout
GPS Xiaomi Mi 8 – roundabout
GPS Xiaomi Mi 8 – overpass
GPS Xiaomi Mi 8 – overpass

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Test chart
Test chart
Test chart (details)
Test chart (details)
ColorChecker colors; reference color in the bottom half of each square.
ColorChecker colors; reference color in the bottom half of each square.
432
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
422
cd/m²
430
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
424
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 449 cd/m² Médio: 434.2 cd/m² Minimum: 3.08 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 430 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.09 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
140.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.257
Xiaomi Mi 8
AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.21
OnePlus 6T
Optic AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Super AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.2
Samsung Galaxy S9
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8
Sony Xperia XZ3
OLED, 2880x1440, 6
Screen
24%
10%
37%
-10%
Brightness middle
430
437
2%
429
0%
529
23%
543
26%
Brightness
434
442
2%
432
0%
527
21%
542
25%
Brightness Distribution
94
95
1%
88
-6%
96
2%
92
-2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.09
2.21
57%
3.39
33%
1.4
72%
6.6
-30%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.05
4.27
47%
5.25
35%
4
50%
11
-37%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.3
2.1
36%
3.3
-0%
1.6
52%
4.7
-42%
Gamma
2.257 97%
2.307 95%
2.238 98%
2.16 102%
1.835 120%
CCT
7026 93%
6353 102%
7135 91%
6358 102%
6817 95%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 238 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 238 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 238 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9596 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40.5 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13371 Points ∼94%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13341 Points ∼93% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14299 Points ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
6219 Points ∼43% -53%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
13194 Points ∼92% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (10876 - 14489, n=25)
13578 Points ∼95% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (870 - 21070, n=269)
4623 Points ∼32% -65%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8907 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8995 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8548 Points ∼95% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
8786 Points ∼98% -1%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
7934 Points ∼88% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (7754 - 9231, n=27)
8705 Points ∼97% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=322)
4488 Points ∼50% -50%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2430 Points ∼66%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2384 Points ∼65% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2441 Points ∼66% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
3688 Points ∼100% +52%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
2272 Points ∼62% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2272 - 2500, n=27)
2416 Points ∼66% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (437 - 4824, n=323)
1324 Points ∼36% -46%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7983 Points ∼94%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8487 Points ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7360 Points ∼87% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
5291 Points ∼62% -34%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (7983 - 9868, n=28)
8069 Points ∼95% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6483 - 9974, n=330)
4852 Points ∼57% -39%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9689 Points ∼84%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
10590 Points ∼92% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8967 Points ∼78% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
5736 Points ∼50% -41%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
11474 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (7998 - 13211, n=26)
10123 Points ∼88% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4290 - 13531, n=499)
5280 Points ∼46% -46%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2215 Points ∼59%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3681 Points ∼98% +66%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2227 Points ∼59% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
2590 Points ∼69% +17%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3764 Points ∼100% +70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2185 - 3764, n=28)
3088 Points ∼82% +39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=346)
1792 Points ∼48% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4471 Points ∼76%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5877 Points ∼100% +31%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4209 Points ∼72% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
3697 Points ∼63% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5810 Points ∼99% +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (4133 - 8206, n=28)
5439 Points ∼93% +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=346)
1535 Points ∼26% -66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3646 Points ∼70%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5189 Points ∼100% +42%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3512 Points ∼68% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
3376 Points ∼65% -7%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5184 Points ∼100% +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (3512 - 5200, n=28)
4607 Points ∼89% +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=349)
1431 Points ∼28% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2181 Points ∼59%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3374 Points ∼92% +55%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2145 Points ∼58% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
2650 Points ∼72% +22%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3672 Points ∼100% +68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2110 - 3763, n=27)
3094 Points ∼84% +42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4493, n=361)
1769 Points ∼48% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5328 Points ∼63%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8397 Points ∼100% +58%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5922 Points ∼71% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
4843 Points ∼58% -9%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
8369 Points ∼100% +57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (5228 - 8451, n=27)
7671 Points ∼91% +44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=361)
2113 Points ∼25% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4034 Points ∼62%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6310 Points ∼97% +56%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4232 Points ∼65% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
4091 Points ∼63% +1%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
6517 Points ∼100% +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (4034 - 6568, n=27)
5761 Points ∼88% +43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 7980, n=362)
1797 Points ∼28% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2137 Points ∼58%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3537 Points ∼96% +66%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2118 Points ∼57% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
2486 Points ∼67% +16%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3703 Points ∼100% +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2118 - 3703, n=27)
3217 Points ∼87% +51%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4262, n=420)
1728 Points ∼47% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4010 Points ∼77%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5241 Points ∼100% +31%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3742 Points ∼71% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
3553 Points ∼68% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5092 Points ∼97% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (3488 - 5246, n=27)
4919 Points ∼94% +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=422)
1271 Points ∼24% -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3356 Points ∼71%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4734 Points ∼100% +41%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3197 Points ∼68% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
3244 Points ∼69% -3%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
4700 Points ∼99% +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (3197 - 4734, n=27)
4388 Points ∼93% +31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=430)
1216 Points ∼26% -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2124 Points ∼59%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3483 Points ∼97% +64%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2176 Points ∼60% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
2600 Points ∼72% +22%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3603 Points ∼100% +70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2124 - 3668, n=27)
3115 Points ∼86% +47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4240, n=453)
1633 Points ∼45% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6243 Points ∼75%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8272 Points ∼100% +33%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6554 Points ∼79% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
4569 Points ∼55% -27%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
8014 Points ∼97% +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (5637 - 8312, n=27)
7763 Points ∼94% +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 9983, n=453)
1729 Points ∼21% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4363 Points ∼69%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6336 Points ∼100% +45%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4529 Points ∼71% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
3911 Points ∼62% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
6300 Points ∼99% +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (4363 - 6454, n=27)
5811 Points ∼92% +33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7673, n=461)
1483 Points ∼23% -66%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
27858 Points ∼76%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35022 Points ∼95% +26%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
30765 Points ∼84% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
26851 Points ∼73% -4%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
36794 Points ∼100% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (15614 - 37475, n=27)
33322 Points ∼91% +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8253 - 45072, n=615)
13397 Points ∼36% -52%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
77203 Points ∼91%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
84998 Points ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
77003 Points ∼91% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
48433 Points ∼57% -37%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
83927 Points ∼99% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (53794 - 85487, n=27)
80548 Points ∼95% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3588 - 162695, n=615)
19336 Points ∼23% -75%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
55397 Points ∼85%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
64534 Points ∼99% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
57711 Points ∼88% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
41093 Points ∼63% -26%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
65330 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (34855 - 65330, n=27)
61139 Points ∼94% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4164 - 83518, n=616)
16160 Points ∼25% -71%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
120 fps ∼79%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
152 fps ∼100% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
102 fps ∼67% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
144 fps ∼95% +20%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
152 fps ∼100% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (98 - 152, n=28)
142 fps ∼93% +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=640)
33.7 fps ∼22% -72%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼97%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼97% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
58 fps ∼93% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
60 fps ∼97% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
60 fps ∼97% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (58 - 89, n=27)
62.1 fps ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=643)
26.2 fps ∼42% -56%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
67 fps ∼81%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼71% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
54 fps ∼65% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
73 fps ∼88% +9%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
83 fps ∼100% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (54 - 83, n=27)
73.1 fps ∼88% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 132, n=559)
18.4 fps ∼22% -73%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
56 fps ∼95%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼100% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
51 fps ∼86% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
45 fps ∼76% -20%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
50 fps ∼85% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (33 - 75, n=27)
54.4 fps ∼92% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=564)
17.1 fps ∼29% -69%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
47 fps ∼80%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼100% +26%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
32 fps ∼54% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
46 fps ∼78% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
57 fps ∼97% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (32 - 61, n=28)
53.9 fps ∼91% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=421)
15.3 fps ∼26% -67%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
45 fps ∼85%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
53 fps ∼100% +18%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
29 fps ∼55% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
24 fps ∼45% -47%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
31 fps ∼58% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (21 - 59, n=27)
45.3 fps ∼85% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=424)
14.7 fps ∼28% -67%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
22 fps ∼100%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
22 fps ∼100% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
14 fps ∼64% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (12 - 25, n=17)
18.6 fps ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 59, n=125)
8.92 fps ∼41% -59%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼90%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼90% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
14 fps ∼90% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (11 - 31, n=17)
15.6 fps ∼100% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=125)
6.2 fps ∼40% -56%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼100%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
34 fps ∼97% -3%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
21 fps ∼60% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (16 - 40, n=17)
29.1 fps ∼83% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=126)
13.3 fps ∼38% -62%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
34 fps ∼92%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
37 fps ∼100% +9%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
37 fps ∼100% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (29 - 38, n=16)
35.2 fps ∼95% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=125)
14.9 fps ∼40% -56%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
26 fps ∼74%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼100% +35%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
25 fps ∼71% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
28 fps ∼80% +8%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
35 fps ∼100% +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (25 - 35, n=27)
33.4 fps ∼95% +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=350)
10.4 fps ∼30% -60%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
28 fps ∼90%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
31 fps ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
24 fps ∼77% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
14 fps ∼45% -50%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
19 fps ∼61% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (13 - 37, n=27)
27.7 fps ∼89% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=354)
9.32 fps ∼30% -67%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
294488 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
288062 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
243861 Points ∼83%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
292268 Points ∼99%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (246366 - 299878, n=27)
277434 Points ∼94%
Average of class Smartphone
  (36768 - 374820, n=242)
126670 Points ∼43%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
234421 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
228939 Points ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
232931 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
217950 Points ∼93% -7%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
226853 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (162183 - 242953, n=23)
225534 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23275 - 274007, n=448)
82705 Points ∼35% -65%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1292 Points ∼92%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1398 Points ∼100% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1288 Points ∼92% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
1099 Points ∼79% -15%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
1390 Points ∼99% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (1009 - 1613, n=26)
1344 Points ∼96% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=573)
726 Points ∼52% -44%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7895 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7969 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7965 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
6373 Points ∼80% -19%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
7989 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (5846 - 8001, n=26)
7797 Points ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=573)
1866 Points ∼23% -76%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3261 Points ∼75%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4344 Points ∼100% +33%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3521 Points ∼81% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
2669 Points ∼61% -18%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
2317 Points ∼53% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2193 - 5296, n=26)
3649 Points ∼84% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 6283, n=573)
1380 Points ∼32% -58%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6620 Points ∼81%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8156 Points ∼100% +23%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6556 Points ∼80% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
6234 Points ∼76% -6%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
8135 Points ∼100% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (4417 - 8613, n=26)
7644 Points ∼94% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=573)
2752 Points ∼34% -58%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3852 Points ∼86%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4458 Points ∼100% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3923 Points ∼88% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 4096
3285 Points ∼74% -15%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3804 Points ∼85% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (3291 - 4693, n=26)
4111 Points ∼92% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=577)
1365 Points ∼31% -65%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)
87.883 Points ∼100% +16%
Average of class Smartphone (18.4 - 23832, n=479)
87.5 Points ∼100% +16%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
86.123 Points ∼98% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
80.876 Points ∼92% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
75.483 Points ∼86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (0 - 90.9, n=27)
74.3 Points ∼85% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
67.721 Points ∼77% -10%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)
16982 Points ∼100% +13%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
16824 Points ∼99% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
15233 Points ∼90% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=28)
15153 Points ∼89% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
15086 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
14617 Points ∼86% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (3126 - 43280, n=633)
6012 Points ∼35% -60%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=653)
11004 ms * ∼100% -290%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=28)
2905 ms * ∼26% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
2818 ms * ∼26%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
2316.8 ms * ∼21% +18%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)
2295 ms * ∼21% +19%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
2281.6 ms * ∼21% +19%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
2077.8 ms * ∼19% +26%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)
98 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (19 - 103, n=18)
85.2 Points ∼87% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
83 Points ∼85%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 161, n=107)
63.7 Points ∼65% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S9
63 Points ∼64% -24%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
260 Points ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
251 Points ∼97% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
245 Points ∼94%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)
238 Points ∼92% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (245 - 291, n=24)
236 Points ∼91% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
163 Points ∼63% -33%
Average of class Smartphone (106 - 362, n=321)
118 Points ∼45% -52%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Mi 8OnePlus 6TXiaomi Mi 8 Explorer EditionSamsung Galaxy S9Sony Xperia XZ3Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
3%
2%
6%
-1%
71%
-50%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
67.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
30.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
64.7 (51.3 - 72.4, n=13)
47.9 (9.5 - 87.1, n=382)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
79.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
34.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
79.6 (73.2 - 85.4, n=13)
66 (8.1 - 96.5, n=382)
Random Write 4KB
21
22
5%
22.65
8%
23.07
10%
22.22
6%
80.3 (18.2 - 250, n=31)
282%
18.9 (0.14 - 250, n=684)
-10%
Random Read 4KB
136.3
138.5
2%
135.21
-1%
131
-4%
135.67
0%
136 (98.9 - 158, n=31)
0%
43 (1.59 - 174, n=684)
-68%
Sequential Write 256KB
207.8
204.4
-2%
205.23
-1%
206.94
0%
196.14
-6%
198 (183 - 212, n=31)
-5%
88.8 (2.99 - 388, n=684)
-57%
Sequential Read 256KB
693.2
735.3
6%
691.65
0%
815.43
18%
680.98
-2%
740 (427 - 912, n=31)
7%
250 (12.1 - 1468, n=684)
-64%
Arena of Valor
0102030405060Tooltip
; min; 1.27.1.2: Ø59.8 (56-60)
; high HD; 1.27.1.2: Ø59.8 (57-60)
Asphalt 9
0102030Tooltip
; High Quality; 1.4.1a: Ø29.5 (28-30)
; Standard / low; 1.4.1a: Ø29.3 (27-30)
Carga Máxima
 41.7 °C38.4 °C36.7 °C 
 42.5 °C38.9 °C37.4 °C 
 41.6 °C38.4 °C36.7 °C 
Máximo: 42.5 °C
Médio: 39.1 °C
32.6 °C36 °C38.9 °C
33.5 °C37.4 °C39.7 °C
34.1 °C37.7 °C39.3 °C
Máximo: 39.7 °C
Médio: 36.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  42.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.737.72542.136.43130.529.14033.632.75038.134.86330.431.88025.224.810025.524.9125262916021.538.920020.144.625018.947.831517.85440018.35850019.162.663019.565.280017.366.5100015.767.2125014.369.6160015.871200014.874.9250015.470.7315014.766.8400014.361.3500014.768.4630014.870.7800014.267.5100001462.21250014.554.91600014.347.5SPL68.82881.2N22.2147.9median 15.7median 62.6Delta2.310.230.32938.131.328.52831.428.536.634.224.628.624.126.520.523.11927.316.939.919.151.416.652.413.9551559.514.659.112.357.411.858.611.863.811.968.611.469.511.27011.573.311.370.510.968.710.568.610.76610.665.210.566.410.655.710.638.964.357.22480.516.810.40.545.3median 11.8median 59.52.28.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi 8OnePlus 6T
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi 8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

OnePlus 6T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.5 / 2.2 / 2.6 Watt
Carga midlight 6.1 / 10.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi 8
3400 mAh
OnePlus 6T
3700 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ3
3300 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
35%
-14%
52%
40%
24%
33%
Idle Minimum *
1.5
0.7
53%
1.8
-20%
0.65
57%
0.8
47%
0.862 (0.42 - 1.8, n=26)
43%
0.883 (0.2 - 3.4, n=714)
41%
Idle Average *
2.2
1.1
50%
2.9
-32%
0.81
63%
1.2
45%
1.728 (0.67 - 2.9, n=26)
21%
1.735 (0.6 - 6.2, n=713)
21%
Idle Maximum *
2.6
2.1
19%
3.5
-35%
0.92
65%
1.5
42%
2.07 (0.87 - 3.5, n=26)
20%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=714)
22%
Load Average *
6.1
4.2
31%
4.8
21%
4.76
22%
4.8
21%
4.87 (3.56 - 7.41, n=26)
20%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=708)
33%
Load Maximum *
10.9
8.3
24%
11.2
-3%
5.16
53%
6.2
43%
9.27 (6.2 - 12.3, n=26)
15%
5.85 (1.2 - 14.2, n=708)
46%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
27h 14min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 57min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 35min
Xiaomi Mi 8
3400 mAh
OnePlus 6T
3700 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ3
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
15%
-7%
-30%
-31%
Reader / Idle
1634
1936
18%
1401
-14%
1182
-28%
1270
-22%
H.264
897
903
1%
921
3%
609
-32%
420
-53%
WiFi v1.3
736
865
18%
694
-6%
474
-36%
419
-43%
Load
215
261
21%
191
-11%
164
-24%
202
-6%

Pro

+ Carcaça robusta e bonita
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Muito desempenho
+ Preço baixo
+ Câmeras de alta qualidade
+ Tela HDR

Contra

- Muitos aplicativos não podem ser desinstalados
- GPS inexato
- Situação da garantia questionável
- Consumo comparativamente alto de energia
In Review: Xiaomi Mi 8. Review unit courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de
In Review: Xiaomi Mi 8. Review unit courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Quando analisamos o Mi 8 Explorer Edition, julgamos ser o padrão ouro da faixa de menos de $ 400, e isso também é verdade para o Mi 8. Não é tão excepcional, apresenta menos brilho (como a tampa traseira translúcida ou o leitor de digitais na tela), mas ainda oferece componentes tradicionais bem estabelecidos a um preço justo. Mesmo muitos meses após o lançamento oficial do smartphone nos países ocidentais, ele continua sendo muito mais barato do que muitos de seus concorrentes, incluindo o autoproclamado assassino de carros chefe, o OnePlus 6T.

Pode não atender aos mais altos padrões e expectativas - seu GPS não é suficientemente preciso, seu modem Wi-Fi é muito lento e seu consumo de energia é muito alto. No entanto, no dia-a-dia, se sente como um smartphone premium com um carcaça robusta, um poderoso SoC, uma tela AMOLED com capacidade HDR e dispositivos de entrada decentes.

Graças à sua excelente relação preço-desempenho, o Xiaomi Mi 8 se mantém fiel à sua palavra.

Existem apenas duas desvantagens. Em primeiro lugar, a garantia do fabricante (ou melhor, falta dela) e o fato de que os clientes estão limitados a apenas uma potencial garantia de revendedor. E segundo, o fato de que enquanto o sistema operacional e o software foram traduzidos muito bem desta vez, a quantidade de bloatware que não pode ser desinstalada ainda é exagerada. Além disso, quando você se aprofunda nas opções e nas configurações, elas ficam muito mais… digamos, exclusiva.

No geral, o Xiaomi Mi 8 ainda merece nosso endosso total, e não apenas por causa de seu alto valor pelo dinheiro. Mal podemos esperar pelo Xiaomi Mi 9, que é esperado para aparecer na nossa porta em apenas algumas semanas.

Xiaomi Mi 8 - 03/11/2019 v6
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
87%
Teclado
66 / 75 → 88%
Mouse
94%
Conectividade
49 / 60 → 81%
Peso
90%
Bateria
95%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
61 / 63 → 97%
Desempenho da aplicação
73 / 70 → 100%
Temperatura
87%
Ruído
100%
Audio
68 / 91 → 75%
Camera
80%
Médio
80%
88%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi 8
Florian Schmitt, 2019-03-14 (Update: 2019-03-15)