Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite: Muito por pouco

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 12/10/2019

In-screen fingerprint included. O Mi 9 Lite da Xiaomi possui muita tecnologia e eleva drasticamente a barra dos smartphones de US$ 250. Descubra em nossa análise se este smartphone da China se desempenha adequadamente ou não.

Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite (Mi 9 Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 616
Memória
6144 MB 
, DDR4x, 2.133 MHz, dual-channel
Pantalha
6.39 polegadas 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, capacitiva, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Brilhante: sim, HDR
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, , 115 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, USB Type-C, Card Reader: microSD (FAT, FAT32, exFAT, até 256GB), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, USB-C
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5, 2G GSM (B2/B3/B5/B8), 3G WCDMA (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G LTE FDD/TDE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.67 x 156.8 x 74.5
Bateria
4030 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/1.8, 1/2", 0.8µm) + 8MP + 2MP
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.0, 0.8 µm)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2 alto-falantes, Teclado: na tela, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação modular USB, cabo USB Type-C, Ferramenta SIM, capa protetora, MIUI Global 10.3.6 Stable, 12 Meses Garantia, head SAR: 1,42 W/kg, body SAR: 1,4 W/kg, fanless
peso
179 g, Suprimento de energia: 80 g
Preço
250 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Vergleichsgeräte

RatingDateModelWeightDriveSizeResolutionBest Price
80%12/2019Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
710, Adreno 616
179 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.39"2340x1080
80%04/2019Samsung Galaxy A50
Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3
166 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.4"2340x1080
79%10/2019Nokia 7.2
660, Adreno 512
180 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.3"2340x1080
77%06/2019HTC Desire 19+
Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320
170 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.2"1520x720
78%11/2019Motorola Moto G8 Plus
665, Adreno 610
188 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.3"2280x1080
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite

Size Comparison

159.92 mm 75.15 mm 8.25 mm 180 g158.4 mm 75.8 mm 9.1 mm 188 g158.5 mm 74.7 mm 7.7 mm 166 g156.8 mm 74.5 mm 8.67 mm 179 g156.2 mm 74.8 mm 8.5 mm 170 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
347 (min: 338, max: 351) MBit/s ∼100%
Nokia 7.2
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
344 (min: 336, max: 352) MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
294 (min: 278, max: 302) MBit/s ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1014, n=476)
235 MBit/s ∼68% -32%
HTC Desire 19+
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 64 GB eMMC Flash
186 (min: 115, max: 228) MBit/s ∼54% -46%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Adreno 610, 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
182 (min: 11, max: 259) MBit/s ∼52% -48%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nokia 7.2
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
296 (min: 223, max: 308) MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Adreno 616, 710, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
296 (min: 228, max: 370) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
272 (min: 250, max: 285) MBit/s ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 966, n=476)
222 MBit/s ∼75% -25%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Adreno 610, 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
152 (min: 1, max: 254) MBit/s ∼51% -49%
HTC Desire 19+
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 64 GB eMMC Flash
84 (min: 22, max: 191) MBit/s ∼28% -72%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø347 (338-351)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø296 (228-370)
GNSS - Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
GNSS - Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
GNSS - Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
GNSS - Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
GNSS - Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
GNSS - Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker Photo
29 ∆E
52.1 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
35 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
61.1 ∆E
52.3 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
37.9 ∆E
27 ∆E
62 ∆E
63 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
32.9 ∆E
71.8 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
82.3 ∆E
68.6 ∆E
50.5 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite: 44.62 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 82.34 ∆E
ColorChecker Photo
12.6 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
4 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite: 6.48 ∆E min: 1.91 - max: 17.11 ∆E
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite - test chart
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite - test chart (zoomed-in)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite - test chart (1 lux)
623
cd/m²
627
cd/m²
630
cd/m²
625
cd/m²
618
cd/m²
624
cd/m²
627
cd/m²
625
cd/m²
638
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 638 cd/m² Médio: 626.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.51 cd/m²
iluminação: 97 %
iluminação com acumulador: 618 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
95.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Samsung Galaxy A50
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4
Nokia 7.2
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
HTC Desire 19+
IPS, 1520x720, 6.2
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
IPS, 2280x1080, 6.3
Screen
-85%
-175%
-134%
-172%
Brightness middle
618
644
4%
604
-2%
491
-21%
597
-3%
Brightness
626
628
0%
593
-5%
470
-25%
596
-5%
Brightness Distribution
97
91
-6%
92
-5%
84
-13%
93
-4%
Black Level *
0.4
0.33
0.52
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1
2.64
-164%
5.1
-410%
4.34
-334%
5.93
-493%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.4
9.23
-285%
10.3
-329%
8.17
-240%
9.42
-293%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.6
2.5
-56%
6.4
-300%
4.3
-169%
5.3
-231%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.024 109%
2.23 99%
2.302 96%
2.232 99%
CCT
6389 102%
6649 98%
8149 80%
7214 90%
7632 85%
Contrast
1510
1488
1148

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240.4 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 13573 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.5 ms).
Geekbench 5
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
680 Points ∼50%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
183 Points ∼14% -73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
 
680 Points ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (143 - 3222, n=40)
1355 Points ∼100% +99%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
830 Points ∼46%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
601 Points ∼33% -28%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
370 Points ∼21% -55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
 
830 Points ∼46% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 4593, n=46)
1803 Points ∼100% +117%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1515 Points ∼80%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1483 Points ∼79% -2%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1031 Points ∼55% -32%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1379 Points ∼73% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
 
1515 Points ∼80% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (807 - 3575, n=58)
1886 Points ∼100% +24%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
394 Points ∼73%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
313 Points ∼58% -21%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
165 Points ∼31% -58%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
315 Points ∼59% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
 
394 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 1344, n=58)
537 Points ∼100% +36%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
6719 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5827 Points ∼87% -13%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5917 Points ∼88% -12%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
5703 Points ∼85% -15%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6534 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (6453 - 6887, n=5)
6696 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=413)
5411 Points ∼81% -19%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
8093 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
7029 Points ∼86% -13%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
7753 Points ∼95% -4%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8186 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (7041 - 8414, n=5)
7895 Points ∼96% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=577)
5882 Points ∼72% -27%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2337 Points ∼88%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2207 Points ∼83% -6%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2268 Points ∼85% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2129 - 2337, n=2)
2233 Points ∼84% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=87)
2660 Points ∼100% +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1630 Points ∼61%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1141 Points ∼43% -30%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
901 Points ∼34% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1579 - 1630, n=2)
1605 Points ∼60% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=87)
2655 Points ∼100% +63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1747 Points ∼72%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1278 Points ∼52% -27%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1040 Points ∼43% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1675 - 1747, n=2)
1711 Points ∼70% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=87)
2439 Points ∼100% +40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2462 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2266 Points ∼84% -8%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2693 Points ∼100% +9%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1221 Points ∼45% -50%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2341 Points ∼87% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1840 - 2534, n=5)
2252 Points ∼84% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5576, n=421)
2010 Points ∼75% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1842 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1188 Points ∼64% -36%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1256 Points ∼68% -32%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
489 Points ∼26% -73%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
981 Points ∼53% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1842 - 1875, n=5)
1859 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=421)
1808 Points ∼97% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1951 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1328 Points ∼68% -32%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1425 Points ∼73% -27%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
564 Points ∼29% -71%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1126 Points ∼58% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1867 - 1981, n=5)
1928 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=422)
1684 Points ∼86% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2447 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2241 Points ∼85% -8%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2640 Points ∼100% +8%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1213 Points ∼46% -50%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2393 Points ∼91% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1862 - 2526, n=5)
2307 Points ∼87% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5133, n=449)
1918 Points ∼73% -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2853 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1553 Points ∼54% -46%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2007 Points ∼70% -30%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
817 Points ∼29% -71%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1670 Points ∼58% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2841 - 2887, n=5)
2864 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=449)
2415 Points ∼84% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2752 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1667 Points ∼61% -39%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2120 Points ∼77% -23%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
881 Points ∼32% -68%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1790 Points ∼65% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2544 - 2798, n=5)
2711 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=449)
2036 Points ∼74% -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2435 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2351 Points ∼89% -3%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2649 Points ∼100% +9%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1183 Points ∼45% -51%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2424 Points ∼92% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2054 - 2514, n=5)
2379 Points ∼90% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4909, n=501)
1916 Points ∼72% -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1698 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1149 Points ∼67% -32%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1181 Points ∼69% -30%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
441 Points ∼26% -74%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
979 Points ∼57% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1698 - 1714, n=5)
1706 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=501)
1503 Points ∼88% -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1820 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1296 Points ∼71% -29%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1347 Points ∼74% -26%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
512 Points ∼28% -72%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1128 Points ∼62% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1774 - 1836, n=5)
1819 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=502)
1450 Points ∼80% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2441 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2432 Points ∼92% 0%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2632 Points ∼100% +8%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1177 Points ∼45% -52%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2452 Points ∼93% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1878 - 2495, n=5)
2336 Points ∼89% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4900, n=541)
1779 Points ∼68% -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2730 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1279 Points ∼47% -53%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1913 Points ∼70% -30%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
733 Points ∼27% -73%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1634 Points ∼59% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2725 - 2767, n=5)
2748 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=540)
1976 Points ∼72% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2660 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1430 Points ∼54% -46%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2037 Points ∼77% -23%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
800 Points ∼30% -70%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1765 Points ∼66% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2490 - 2694, n=5)
2636 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8338, n=543)
1710 Points ∼64% -36%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
13595 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14353 Points ∼77% +6%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
18094 Points ∼97% +33%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
17468 Points ∼93% +28%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
18698 Points ∼100% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (13595 - 14820, n=5)
14273 Points ∼76% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=701)
14394 Points ∼77% +6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
39745 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16593 Points ∼42% -58%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
28898 Points ∼73% -27%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
12205 Points ∼31% -69%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24992 Points ∼63% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (37157 - 39745, n=5)
38928 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=699)
22589 Points ∼57% -43%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
27843 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16037 Points ∼57% -42%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
25513 Points ∼91% -8%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
13081 Points ∼47% -53%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
23253 Points ∼83% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (26967 - 28895, n=5)
28116 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=699)
18255 Points ∼65% -34%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
56 fps ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
39 fps ∼62% -30%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
50 fps ∼79% -11%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps ∼57% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (56 - 65, n=5)
63.2 fps ∼100% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=714)
38.7 fps ∼61% -31%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
65 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
36 fps ∼55% -45%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
46 fps ∼71% -29%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
34 fps ∼52% -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (54 - 65, n=5)
57.4 fps ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=723)
28.5 fps ∼44% -56%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
32 fps ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼71% -28%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
23 fps ∼71% -28%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
20 fps ∼62% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (32 - 33, n=5)
32.4 fps ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=619)
22.4 fps ∼69% -30%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
20 fps ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
21 fps ∼76% +5%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
21 fps ∼76% +5%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
18 fps ∼65% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (20 - 31, n=5)
27.6 fps ∼100% +38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=628)
19.7 fps ∼71% -1%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
23 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼61% -39%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
15 fps ∼65% -35%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼57% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (23 - 23, n=5)
23 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=484)
18.2 fps ∼79% -21%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
21 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
13 fps ∼62% -38%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
13 fps ∼62% -38%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
12 fps ∼57% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (19 - 22, n=5)
20.8 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=486)
17 fps ∼81% -19%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
7.8 fps ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4.9 fps ∼49% -37%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
4.9 fps ∼49% -37%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4.7 fps ∼47% -40%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4.5 fps ∼45% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (5.9 - 8.4, n=5)
7.44 fps ∼75% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=211)
9.95 fps ∼100% +28%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
5.1 fps ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.1 fps ∼45% -39%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
3.2 fps ∼46% -37%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1.5 fps ∼22% -71%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼41% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (4.9 - 7.8, n=5)
5.6 fps ∼81% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=210)
6.89 fps ∼100% +35%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
12 fps ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.2 fps ∼56% -32%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
7.7 fps ∼52% -36%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
7.3 fps ∼50% -39%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.6 fps ∼52% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (11 - 13, n=5)
12.2 fps ∼83% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=215)
14.7 fps ∼100% +23%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
14 fps ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9 fps ∼55% -36%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
8.7 fps ∼53% -38%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
3.9 fps ∼24% -72%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.2 fps ∼50% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (13 - 14, n=5)
13.8 fps ∼84% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=215)
16.4 fps ∼100% +17%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
13 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.9 fps ∼68% -32%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
9 fps ∼69% -31%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.2 fps ∼55% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (13 - 13, n=5)
13 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=409)
12.4 fps ∼95% -5%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
12 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.1 fps ∼68% -32%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
8.2 fps ∼68% -32%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6.6 fps ∼55% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (11 - 13, n=5)
12 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=413)
11.1 fps ∼93% -7%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
172068 Points ∼64%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
157877 Points ∼58% -8%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
169222 Points ∼63% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
 
172068 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (84645 - 534558, n=35)
270267 Points ∼100% +57%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1155 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
927 Points ∼80% -20%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
926 Points ∼80% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1070 - 1155, n=5)
1107 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=650)
767 Points ∼66% -34%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
3100 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1957 Points ∼63% -37%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1916 Points ∼62% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2906 - 3102, n=5)
3050 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=650)
2126 Points ∼69% -31%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2872 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2492 Points ∼81% -13%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2835 Points ∼92% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2872 - 3575, n=5)
3092 Points ∼100% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=650)
1571 Points ∼51% -45%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
5813 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5112 Points ∼88% -12%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5000 Points ∼86% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (5603 - 5813, n=5)
5702 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=650)
3061 Points ∼53% -47%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2780 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2193 Points ∼79% -21%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2240 Points ∼81% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2731 - 2855, n=5)
2775 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=650)
1535 Points ∼55% -45%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite (Chrome 78)
36.478 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=118)
36.3 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (29 - 36.5, n=2)
32.7 Points ∼90% -10%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)
30.531 Points ∼84% -16%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite (Chrome 78)
66.615 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (50.5 - 66.6, n=5)
62.9 Points ∼94% -6%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)
49.754 Points ∼75% -25%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=547)
42.7 Points ∼64% -36%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=106)
40 runs/min ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite (Chrome 78)
38.7 runs/min ∼97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (36.7 - 38.7, n=2)
37.7 runs/min ∼94% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chome 73)
33.07 runs/min ∼83% -15%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)
30.5 runs/min ∼76% -21%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite (Chrome 78)
69 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (58 - 72, n=5)
68 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=179)
67.4 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
62 Points ∼90% -10%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)
51 Points ∼74% -26%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite (Chrome 78)
12520 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (10885 - 12802, n=5)
12227 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
10322 Points ∼82% -18%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)
9107 Points ∼73% -27%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=708)
6954 Points ∼56% -44%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=733)
10398 ms * ∼100% -189%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)
4504 ms * ∼43% -25%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
3897 ms * ∼37% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite (Chrome 78)
3593.7 ms * ∼35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (3035 - 3800, n=5)
3333 ms * ∼32% +7%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Mi 9 LiteSamsung Galaxy A50Nokia 7.2HTC Desire 19+Motorola Moto G8 PlusAverage 128 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-20%
-32%
-29%
-19%
-9%
-45%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.89 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
60.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
63.99 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
61.75 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
52.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-18%
57 (33.6 - 70.2, n=11)
-11%
49.8 (1.7 - 87.1, n=449)
-22%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
86.02 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-14%
83.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
81.85 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
72.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-16%
74.4 (54 - 86, n=11)
-14%
68 (8.1 - 96.5, n=449)
-21%
Random Write 4KB
116.6
18.2
-84%
13.38
-89%
20.4
-83%
124.9
7%
83.2 (13.5 - 180, n=15)
-29%
24 (0.14 - 259, n=777)
-79%
Random Read 4KB
113.5
98.9
-13%
79.64
-30%
76.5
-33%
59.9
-47%
119 (88.4 - 173, n=15)
5%
49.4 (1.59 - 226, n=777)
-56%
Sequential Write 256KB
252.1
192.1
-24%
161.4
-36%
210.8
-16%
217.4
-14%
193 (143 - 257, n=15)
-23%
101 (2.99 - 590, n=777)
-60%
Sequential Read 256KB
421.5
507.3
20%
290.83
-31%
288
-32%
302.5
-28%
490 (409 - 733, n=15)
16%
283 (12.1 - 1781, n=777)
-33%
Asphalt 9: Legends
010203040Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø29.4 (21-31)
; Standard / low: Ø29.7 (23-31)
Arena of Valor
010203040506070Tooltip
; min: Ø60 (58-61)
; high HD: Ø60 (56-61)
Carga Máxima
 40.8 °C37.2 °C34 °C 
 40.5 °C37 °C34 °C 
 39.4 °C36.9 °C33.8 °C 
Máximo: 40.8 °C
Médio: 37.1 °C
32.6 °C35.7 °C39.7 °C
32.9 °C35.3 °C39.3 °C
33.4 °C35.8 °C38.3 °C
Máximo: 39.7 °C
Médio: 35.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  39.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.935.12529.132.53125.426.94029.426.95039.441.56327.326.88021.626.61002424.512520.732.816019.945.52001848.625016.851.931516.256.240015.959.250013.564.763013.967.180012.973.810001476.6125014.775.6160014.174.4200014.274.2250014.575.8315015.475.1400014.979.2500014.879.163001575.5800015.373.41000015.363.21250015.661.41600015.568.7SPL2787.4N0.970.1median 15.3median 68.7Delta1.311.141.239.237.53630.528.43329.237.635.928.624.523.923.222.823.421.925.820.336.6204519.152.71754.316.555.916.863.316.270.315.571.114.87014.171.715.572.715.574.114.572.913.871.813.771.213.871.61468.31464.814.163.514.257.714.351.862.127.18314.70.954.1median 15.5median 64.81.911.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi 9 LiteMotorola Moto G8 Plus
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Motorola Moto G8 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.8 / 1.2 / 1.6 Watt
Carga midlight 2.6 / 4.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
4030 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Nokia 7.2
3500 mAh
HTC Desire 19+
3850 mAh
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
4000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-48%
-61%
-52%
-94%
-19%
-34%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
0.8
-0%
0.77
4%
1.3
-63%
1.7
-113%
0.79 (0.76 - 0.8, n=4)
1%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=800)
-10%
Idle Average *
1.2
1.5
-25%
2.32
-93%
2
-67%
2.3
-92%
1.543 (1.2 - 2.07, n=4)
-29%
1.741 (0.6 - 6.2, n=799)
-45%
Idle Maximum *
1.6
1.7
-6%
2.41
-51%
2.9
-81%
3.5
-119%
1.903 (1.6 - 2.31, n=4)
-19%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=800)
-27%
Load Average *
2.6
5.9
-127%
4.44
-71%
3.6
-38%
4.7
-81%
3.37 (2.6 - 3.97, n=4)
-30%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=794)
-57%
Load Maximum *
4.5
8.3
-84%
8.79
-95%
5
-11%
7.5
-67%
5.21 (4.5 - 5.82, n=4)
-16%
5.94 (1.2 - 14.2, n=794)
-32%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
49h 17min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 14min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 51min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 14min
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
4030 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Nokia 7.2
3500 mAh
HTC Desire 19+
3850 mAh
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-11%
-22%
8%
8%
Reader / Idle
2957
1587
-46%
2002
-32%
H.264
891
869
-2%
996
12%
WiFi v1.3
734
701
-4%
570
-22%
795
8%
980
34%
Load
254
275
8%
302
19%

Pro

+ Bom desempenho do sistema
+ Leitor de digitais integrado na tela
+ Boa relação de preço-desempenho

Contra

- Algumas configurações só podem ser alteradas online depois de criar uma conta Mi
- Desempenho pobre da câmera com pouca luz
- Leitor de digitais um pouco lento
In review: Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite. Review unit courtesy of notebooksbilliger
In review: Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite. Review unit courtesy of notebooksbilliger

A Xiaomi quer provar mais uma vez que a boa conectividade e um desempenho decente não precisam necessariamente ser caros. O Mi 9 Lite foi capaz de superar seus concorrentes em muitos de nossos testes e apresenta recursos como o leitor de digitais na tela e o zoom óptico de 2x em sua classe de smartphones acessíveis, até então limitados a dispositivos de última geração mais caros.

A Xiaomi conseguiu fazer quase tudo certo com o Mi 9 Lite. Nossa única queixa principal é o fato de que algumas configurações exigem que uma conexão ativa à Internet seja alterada.

A duração da bateria é boa, mas poderia ter sido um pouco melhor. A principal falha está no software. Embora a localização seja impecável, o fato de algumas configurações exigirem uma conexão ativa com a Internet e uma conta Xiaomi não é aceitável.

Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite - 12/02/2019 v7
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
84%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 89%
Mouse
94%
Conectividade
48 / 70 → 68%
Peso
90%
Bateria
89%
Pantalha
90%
Desempenho do jogos
21 / 64 → 33%
Desempenho da aplicação
62 / 86 → 72%
Temperatura
90%
Ruído
100%
Audio
72 / 90 → 80%
Camera
58%
Médio
74%
80%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite: Muito por pouco
Mike Wobker, 2019-12-10 (Update: 2019-12-12)