Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi 9T: Um dispositivo de gama média com recorde de duração de bateria

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 07/25/2019

Mi 9 o terceiro. Depois do Mi 9 e Mi 9 SE vem o Mi 9T, um dispositivo que leva a série Mi 9 em uma direção diferente. O 9T herdou muitos recursos do Mi 9, mas se destaca com sua câmera selfie pop-up, uma bateria de 4.000 mAh e um conector de fones de 3,5 mm. Leia para descobrir como o 9T se compara aos seus irmãos Mi 9.

Xiaomi Mi 9T (Mi Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 618
Memória
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4X
Pantalha
6.39 polegadas 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, Multitouch de 10 pontos, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Cobertura de espaço de cor 103,8% NTSC, Brilhante: sim, HDR
Disco rígido
64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 64 GB 
, 52.7 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones e microfone de 3,5 mm, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, e-compass, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi Display, aptX, aptX HD, dual-SIM VoLTE, Camera2 API Level 3, DRM Widevine L1
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. UMTS: 850, 900, 1,700, 1,900, 2,100 MHz. LTE/FDD: Bandas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28. LTE/TDD: Bands 38, 40. SAR values: Body – 1.511 W/kg, Head - 1.341 W/kg., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.8 x 156.7 x 74.3
Bateria
4000 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix Sony IMX582, 1.6 μm, f/1.75. 8 MP telephoto lens, 1.12 μm, f/2.4. 13 MP ultra-wide-angle lens, 1.12 μm, f/2.4, 2x optical zoom, 10x digital zoom. Videos up to 3,840 x 2,160 at 30 FPS.
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix Câmera pop-up, 0.8 μm, f/2.2.
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono no lado inferior do dispositivo, Teclado: virtual, Fonte de alimentação modular de 18 W (5 V/3 A, 9 V/2 A, 12 V/1.5 A), cabo USB Type-A para Type-C, carcaça portetora, SIM tool, guia de início rápido, MIUI 10, 12 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
191 g, Suprimento de energia: 40 g
Preço
380 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

158.5 mm 74.7 mm 7.7 mm 166 g156.7 mm 74.3 mm 8.8 mm 191 g157 mm 75.3 mm 8.3 mm 176 g156 mm 68 mm 8.4 mm 162 g152.9 mm 72.7 mm 7.4 mm 159 g147.5 mm 70.5 mm 7.45 mm 155 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia 10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
334 (min: 326, max: 341) MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Adreno 618, 730, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
333 (min: 297, max: 343) MBit/s ∼100%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
332 (min: 314, max: 341) MBit/s ∼99% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Adreno 616, 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
311 (min: 214, max: 346) MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
294 (min: 278, max: 302) MBit/s ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=417)
223 MBit/s ∼67% -33%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
188 (min: 45, max: 237) MBit/s ∼56% -44%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Adreno 618, 730, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
293 (min: 161, max: 346) MBit/s ∼100%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
288 (min: 138, max: 294) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Adreno 616, 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
279 (min: 229, max: 303) MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
272 (min: 250, max: 285) MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Sony Xperia 10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
253 (min: 128, max: 283) MBit/s ∼86% -14%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
218 (min: 95, max: 239) MBit/s ∼74% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=417)
213 MBit/s ∼73% -27%
GPS test: Xiaomi Mi 9T - Overview
GPS test: Xiaomi Mi 9T - Overview
GPS test: Xiaomi Mi 9T – Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Xiaomi Mi 9T – Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Xiaomi Mi 9T: Loop
GPS test: Xiaomi Mi 9T: Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500: Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500: Loop

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
579
cd/m²
581
cd/m²
591
cd/m²
586
cd/m²
589
cd/m²
594
cd/m²
591
cd/m²
588
cd/m²
601
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 601 cd/m² Médio: 588.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.68 cd/m²
iluminação: 96 %
iluminação com acumulador: 589 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
95.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
Xiaomi Mi 9T
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 5.97
Xiaomi Mi 9
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Huawei P30 Lite
IPS LCD, 2312x1080, 6.15
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2
Samsung Galaxy A50
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4
Sony Xperia 10
IPS-LCD, 2520x1080, 6
Screen
-3%
21%
-10%
-105%
-23%
-66%
Brightness middle
589
583
-1%
593
1%
451
-23%
537
-9%
644
9%
547
-7%
Brightness
589
577
-2%
587
0%
430
-27%
525
-11%
628
7%
525
-11%
Brightness Distribution
96
97
1%
94
-2%
90
-6%
85
-11%
91
-5%
93
-3%
Black Level *
0.55
0.58
0.36
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.5
1.6
36%
0.9
64%
1.4
44%
6.41
-156%
2.64
-6%
4.6
-84%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.9
3.9
20%
2
59%
4.4
10%
10.86
-122%
9.23
-88%
12.1
-147%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.6
2.7
-69%
1.5
6%
2.5
-56%
6.7
-319%
2.5
-56%
3.9
-144%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.27 97%
2.27 97%
2.22 99%
2.099 105%
2.024 109%
2.17 101%
CCT
6544 99%
6267 104%
6548 99%
6422 101%
8310 78%
6649 98%
7158 91%
Contrast
820
926
1519

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 245.1 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 245.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 245.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9438 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
7795 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
7282 Points ∼93% -7%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3551 Points ∼45% -54%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4287 Points ∼55% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4913 Points ∼63% -37%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3763 Points ∼48% -52%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7482 Points ∼95% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (7795 - 7881, n=2)
7838 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=316)
4562 Points ∼58% -41%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6871 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5975 Points ∼54% -13%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5429 Points ∼49% -21%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4992 Points ∼45% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5605 Points ∼51% -18%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3986 Points ∼36% -42%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10999 Points ∼100% +60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (6826 - 6871, n=2)
6849 Points ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=374)
4587 Points ∼42% -33%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2527 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1875 Points ∼53% -26%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1544 Points ∼44% -39%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1337 Points ∼38% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1721 Points ∼49% -32%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
837 Points ∼24% -67%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3523 Points ∼100% +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (2436 - 2527, n=2)
2482 Points ∼70% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (691 - 4824, n=376)
1369 Points ∼39% -46%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
7533 Points ∼83%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
6832 Points ∼76% -9%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6483 Points ∼72% -14%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6277 Points ∼69% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5827 Points ∼64% -23%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
5987 Points ∼66% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9035 Points ∼100% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (7177 - 7533, n=2)
7355 Points ∼81% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=370)
5030 Points ∼56% -33%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
9049 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
8346 Points ∼76% -8%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
8125 Points ∼74% -10%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
7618 Points ∼69% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
7029 Points ∼64% -22%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4948 Points ∼45% -45%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10985 Points ∼100% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (8626 - 9049, n=2)
8838 Points ∼80% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=538)
5516 Points ∼50% -39%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2786 Points ∼85%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2338 Points ∼71% -16%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
2167 Points ∼66% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3288 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (2708 - 2786, n=2)
2747 Points ∼84% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2051 - 15735, n=54)
2374 Points ∼72% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1917 Points ∼33%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1907 Points ∼33% -1%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
693 Points ∼12% -64%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5723 Points ∼100% +199%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (1917 - 2160, n=2)
2039 Points ∼36% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (341 - 14536, n=54)
2359 Points ∼41% +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2060 Points ∼42%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1988 Points ∼40% -3%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
861 Points ∼18% -58%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4914 Points ∼100% +139%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (2060 - 2262, n=2)
2161 Points ∼44% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (419 - 14786, n=57)
2051 Points ∼42% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3241 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2506 Points ∼67% -23%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2550 Points ∼68% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2266 Points ∼60% -30%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1664 Points ∼44% -49%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3754 Points ∼100% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (3160 - 3241, n=2)
3201 Points ∼85% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=384)
1832 Points ∼49% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2176 Points ∼31%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2146 Points ∼30% -1%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
843 Points ∼12% -61%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1188 Points ∼17% -45%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
792 Points ∼11% -64%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7076 Points ∼100% +225%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (2176 - 2438, n=2)
2307 Points ∼33% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=384)
1603 Points ∼23% -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2347 Points ∼40%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2217 Points ∼37% -6%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
981 Points ∼17% -58%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1328 Points ∼22% -43%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
896 Points ∼15% -62%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5913 Points ∼100% +152%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (2347 - 2568, n=2)
2458 Points ∼42% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=387)
1489 Points ∼25% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3296 Points ∼87%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2506 Points ∼66% -24%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2578 Points ∼68% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2241 Points ∼59% -32%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1732 Points ∼46% -47%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3788 Points ∼100% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (3025 - 3296, n=2)
3161 Points ∼83% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=399)
1809 Points ∼48% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3316 Points ∼32%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2146 Points ∼21% -35%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1336 Points ∼13% -60%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1553 Points ∼15% -53%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1299 Points ∼13% -61%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10291 Points ∼100% +210%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (3316 - 3635, n=2)
3476 Points ∼34% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=399)
2187 Points ∼21% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3312 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2217 Points ∼30% -33%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1494 Points ∼20% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1667 Points ∼22% -50%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1375 Points ∼18% -58%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7449 Points ∼100% +125%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (3312 - 3479, n=2)
3396 Points ∼46% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=400)
1860 Points ∼25% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3227 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2480 Points ∼66% -23%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2489 Points ∼66% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2351 Points ∼63% -27%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1645 Points ∼44% -49%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3758 Points ∼100% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (3215 - 3227, n=2)
3221 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=460)
1768 Points ∼47% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2008 Points ∼32%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1980 Points ∼31% -1%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
819 Points ∼13% -59%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1149 Points ∼18% -43%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
704 Points ∼11% -65%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6355 Points ∼100% +216%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (2008 - 2244, n=2)
2126 Points ∼33% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=462)
1331 Points ∼21% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2192 Points ∼40%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2073 Points ∼38% -5%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
963 Points ∼17% -56%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1296 Points ∼24% -41%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
809 Points ∼15% -63%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5509 Points ∼100% +151%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (2192 - 2405, n=2)
2299 Points ∼42% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=470)
1269 Points ∼23% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3239 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2480 Points ∼69% -23%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2490 Points ∼69% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2432 Points ∼67% -25%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1687 Points ∼47% -48%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3614 Points ∼100% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (3211 - 3239, n=2)
3225 Points ∼89% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=493)
1677 Points ∼46% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3184 Points ∼32%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1980 Points ∼20% -38%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1256 Points ∼13% -61%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1279 Points ∼13% -60%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1235 Points ∼12% -61%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9963 Points ∼100% +213%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (3184 - 3478, n=2)
3331 Points ∼33% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=493)
1804 Points ∼18% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3196 Points ∼45%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2073 Points ∼29% -35%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1414 Points ∼20% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1430 Points ∼20% -55%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1315 Points ∼18% -59%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7166 Points ∼100% +124%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (3196 - 3415, n=2)
3306 Points ∼46% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=501)
1548 Points ∼22% -52%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
19433 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
13686 Points ∼54% -30%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12023 Points ∼47% -38%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15766 Points ∼62% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14353 Points ∼57% -26%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
12437 Points ∼49% -36%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25339 Points ∼100% +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (19389 - 19433, n=2)
19411 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=652)
13700 Points ∼54% -30%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
46605 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
43514 Points ∼41% -7%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21643 Points ∼20% -54%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
20953 Points ∼20% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16593 Points ∼16% -64%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
17878 Points ∼17% -62%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106534 Points ∼100% +129%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (46605 - 51091, n=2)
48848 Points ∼46% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7573 - 162695, n=652)
20162 Points ∼19% -57%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
35557 Points ∼57%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
29316 Points ∼47% -18%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
18377 Points ∼30% -48%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
19525 Points ∼31% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16037 Points ∼26% -55%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
16290 Points ∼26% -54%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
62225 Points ∼100% +75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (35557 - 37475, n=2)
36516 Points ∼59% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8513 - 83518, n=653)
16700 Points ∼27% -53%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
77 fps ∼46%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
74 fps ∼44% -4%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
33 fps ∼20% -57%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
36 fps ∼22% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
39 fps ∼23% -49%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
29 fps ∼17% -62%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼100% +117%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (77 - 84, n=2)
80.5 fps ∼48% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=681)
35.2 fps ∼21% -54%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
58 fps ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
58 fps ∼97% 0%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
31 fps ∼52% -47%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
35 fps ∼58% -40%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
36 fps ∼60% -38%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
25 fps ∼42% -57%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (58 - 59, n=2)
58.5 fps ∼98% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=684)
27.1 fps ∼45% -53%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps ∼38%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
36 fps ∼36% -5%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
17 fps ∼17% -55%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps ∼16% -58%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼23% -39%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
13 fps ∼13% -66%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼100% +163%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (38 - 42, n=2)
40 fps ∼40% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=600)
19.4 fps ∼19% -49%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
34 fps ∼57%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
33 fps ∼55% -3%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
16 fps ∼27% -53%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15 fps ∼25% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
21 fps ∼35% -38%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
11 fps ∼18% -68%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (34 - 36, n=2)
35 fps ∼58% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=605)
17.9 fps ∼30% -47%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼39%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
26 fps ∼38% -4%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12 fps ∼17% -56%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
10 fps ∼14% -63%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼20% -48%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
9.5 fps ∼14% -65%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼100% +156%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (27 - 30, n=2)
28.5 fps ∼41% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=461)
15.9 fps ∼23% -41%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
24 fps ∼41%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
24 fps ∼41% 0%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
11 fps ∼19% -54%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
9.8 fps ∼17% -59%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
13 fps ∼22% -46%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
7.8 fps ∼13% -67%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +142%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (24 - 26, n=2)
25 fps ∼43% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=464)
15.3 fps ∼26% -36%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
9.3 fps ∼39%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
9.1 fps ∼38% -2%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4.2 fps ∼18% -55%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2 fps ∼8% -78%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4.9 fps ∼20% -47%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
2.7 fps ∼11% -71%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼100% +158%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (9.3 - 10, n=2)
9.65 fps ∼40% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=164)
8.87 fps ∼37% -5%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6.1 fps ∼38%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5.8 fps ∼36% -5%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2.6 fps ∼16% -57%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2.3 fps ∼14% -62%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.1 fps ∼19% -49%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1.7 fps ∼11% -72%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼100% +162%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (6.1 - 6.8, n=2)
6.45 fps ∼40% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=164)
6.16 fps ∼39% +1%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼41%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
14 fps ∼38% -7%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.4 fps ∼17% -57%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.6 fps ∼15% -63%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.2 fps ∼22% -45%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.4 fps ∼12% -71%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼100% +147%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (15 - 16, n=2)
15.5 fps ∼42% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=165)
13.4 fps ∼36% -11%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼39%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
16 fps ∼39% 0%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7 fps ∼17% -56%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.4 fps ∼13% -66%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9 fps ∼22% -44%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.9 fps ∼12% -69%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼100% +156%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (16 - 18, n=2)
17 fps ∼41% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=165)
14.7 fps ∼36% -8%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼38%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
15 fps ∼36% -6%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.9 fps ∼16% -57%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps ∼15% -61%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.9 fps ∼21% -44%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
5.3 fps ∼13% -67%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼100% +163%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (16 - 17, n=2)
16.5 fps ∼39% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=390)
10.7 fps ∼25% -33%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
13 fps ∼34%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
13 fps ∼34% 0%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.5 fps ∼17% -50%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6 fps ∼16% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.1 fps ∼21% -38%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.3 fps ∼11% -67%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼100% +192%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (13 - 15, n=2)
14 fps ∼37% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=394)
9.7 fps ∼26% -25%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16.91 fps ∼45%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
14.23 (min: 8.05, max: 26.52) fps ∼38% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14.51 fps ∼39% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37.41 fps ∼100% +121%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
 
16.9 fps ∼45% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.53 - 37.4, n=61)
15.1 fps ∼40% -11%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
13.56 fps ∼42%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
12.76 (min: 7.68, max: 27.7) fps ∼40% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
11.59 fps ∼36% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
32.2 fps ∼100% +137%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
 
13.6 fps ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.91 - 36.2, n=56)
12.1 fps ∼38% -11%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
15.51 fps ∼44%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
14.18 (min: 8.4, max: 36.6) fps ∼40% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
13.03 fps ∼37% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
35.63 fps ∼100% +130%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
 
15.5 fps ∼44% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.2 - 38.6, n=56)
14.3 fps ∼40% -8%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
210836 Points ∼56%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
179353 Points ∼48% -15%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
132834 Points ∼35% -37%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
117557 Points ∼31% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
144194 Points ∼38% -32%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
88287 Points ∼24% -58%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
374820 Points ∼100% +78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (202586 - 210836, n=2)
206711 Points ∼55% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=283)
131330 Points ∼35% -38%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2000 Score ∼40%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1966 Score ∼40% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1656 Score ∼33% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4964 Score ∼100% +148%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
 
2000 Score ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (552 - 5025, n=58)
1911 Score ∼38% -4%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1099 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1172 Points ∼85% +7%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1024 Points ∼74% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
927 Points ∼67% -16%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
815 Points ∼59% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1378 Points ∼100% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (1099 - 1117, n=2)
1108 Points ∼80% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=613)
744 Points ∼54% -32%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3559 Points ∼38%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
3453 Points ∼37% -3%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1478 Points ∼16% -58%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1957 Points ∼21% -45%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1409 Points ∼15% -60%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9270 Points ∼100% +160%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (3559 - 3855, n=2)
3707 Points ∼40% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=613)
1960 Points ∼21% -45%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
4646 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2969 Points ∼64% -36%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3036 Points ∼65% -35%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2492 Points ∼54% -46%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
983 Points ∼21% -79%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4031 Points ∼87% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (3435 - 4646, n=2)
4041 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=613)
1465 Points ∼32% -68%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6760 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5932 Points ∼70% -12%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5146 Points ∼61% -24%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5112 Points ∼61% -24%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3159 Points ∼37% -53%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8441 Points ∼100% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (6484 - 6760, n=2)
6622 Points ∼78% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=613)
2881 Points ∼34% -57%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3329 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2906 Points ∼63% -13%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2201 Points ∼48% -34%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2193 Points ∼48% -34%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1374 Points ∼30% -59%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4595 Points ∼100% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
  (3129 - 3329, n=2)
3229 Points ∼70% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=617)
1432 Points ∼31% -57%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
603 Points ∼43%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
517 Points ∼37% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
504 Points ∼36% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1415 Points ∼100% +135%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
 
603 Points ∼43% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (35 - 2754, n=103)
703 Points ∼50% +17%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)
57.207 Points ∼100% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
47.131 Points ∼82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (40 - 47.1, n=2)
43.6 Points ∼76% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
37.214 Points ∼65% -21%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
31.781 Points ∼56% -33%
Average of class Smartphone (12.9 - 108, n=90)
30.6 Points ∼53% -35%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
16.254 Points ∼28% -66%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
65.7 runs/min ∼100% +41%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
46.46 runs/min ∼71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (38.9 - 46.5, n=2)
42.7 runs/min ∼65% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
37.5 runs/min ∼57% -19%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 123, n=81)
34.3 runs/min ∼52% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chome 73)
33.07 runs/min ∼50% -29%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
31.7 runs/min ∼48% -32%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
108 Points ∼100% +26%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
86 Points ∼80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (77 - 86, n=2)
81.5 Points ∼75% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
72 Points ∼67% -16%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
66 Points ∼61% -23%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=144)
63.1 Points ∼58% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
62 Points ∼57% -28%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
54 Points ∼50% -37%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
39 Points ∼36% -55%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
24534 Points ∼100% +40%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
17501 Points ∼71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (16358 - 17501, n=2)
16930 Points ∼69% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
13562 Points ∼55% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
10322 Points ∼42% -41%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
9779 Points ∼40% -44%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
8368 Points ∼34% -52%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=674)
6335 Points ∼26% -64%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
4865 Points ∼20% -72%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=694)
10740 ms * ∼100% -319%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
10256.9 ms * ∼96% -300%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
4776 ms * ∼44% -86%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
4137.8 ms * ∼39% -61%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
3897 ms * ∼36% -52%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
2911.8 ms * ∼27% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2564 - 3027, n=2)
2795 ms * ∼26% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
2563.9 ms * ∼24%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
1873.2 ms * ∼17% +27%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Mi 9TXiaomi Mi 9 SEHuawei P30 LiteMotorola Moto G7 PlusSamsung Galaxy A50Sony Xperia 10Xiaomi Mi 9Average 64 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-21%
-29%
-25%
-24%
-40%
55%
-23%
-60%
Random Write 4KB
107.82
21.86
-80%
87.29
-19%
73.1
-32%
18.2
-83%
14.39
-87%
165.32
53%
47.2 (13.6 - 108, n=7)
-56%
20.4 (0.14 - 250, n=722)
-81%
Random Read 4KB
128.65
115.83
-10%
71.57
-44%
76.6
-40%
98.9
-23%
53.12
-59%
149.36
16%
102 (60.6 - 138, n=7)
-21%
45.3 (1.59 - 175, n=722)
-65%
Sequential Write 256KB
179.19
190.1
6%
158.63
-11%
208.7
16%
192.1
7%
232.87
30%
388.27
117%
167 (135 - 194, n=7)
-7%
92.9 (2.99 - 503, n=722)
-48%
Sequential Read 256KB
492.74
492.48
0%
293.23
-40%
283.6
-42%
507.3
3%
273.8
-44%
666.06
35%
463 (272 - 687, n=7)
-6%
261 (12.1 - 1468, n=722)
-47%
010203040506070Tooltip
; Asphalt 9: Legends; 1.6.3a: Ø28.8 (27-31)
; Arena of Valor; 1.30.2.4: Ø59.8 (23-61)
; Shadow Fight 3; 1.18.5: Ø58.5 (1-61)
Carga Máxima
 35.4 °C34.8 °C31.3 °C 
 34.9 °C34.3 °C31.4 °C 
 33.7 °C33.6 °C31.3 °C 
Máximo: 35.4 °C
Médio: 33.4 °C
30 °C32.1 °C34.7 °C
29.6 °C30.8 °C34.4 °C
29.1 °C31.4 °C32.2 °C
Máximo: 34.7 °C
Médio: 31.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  25.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.237.12531.226.13127.226.34023.729.5503136.16322.726.58022.821.810024.425.512520.93116020.350.920019.154.325016.453.33151657.240017.661.950015.265.463014.670.180015.470.2100014.874.3125015.274.8160015.675.5200014.876.9250014.678.9315014.380.6400014.678.5500014.774.3630015.375.1800015.379.31000014.980.91250015.367.71600015.651.7SPL27.389N0.977.1median 15.3median 70.2Delta1.210.932.53931.931.522.324.821.721.929.228.426.724.920.324.420.526.52325.315.64517.849.116.359.115.461.515.963.515.864.213.367.914.165.914.171.41469.713.567.813.46913.972.314.271.713.967.114.672.914.267.714.766.31568.214.955.415.33826.481.50.852.7median 14.7median 66.30.98.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi 9TXiaomi Mi 9 SE
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi 9T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Mi 9 SE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.02 / 0.19 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.54 / 0.95 / 1.08 Watt
Carga midlight 2.7 / 5.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi 9T
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
3070 mAh
Huawei P30 Lite
3340 mAh
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Sony Xperia 10
2870 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-7%
-91%
-82%
-67%
-57%
-37%
-19%
-58%
Idle Minimum *
0.54
0.53
2%
0.91
-69%
1.1
-104%
0.8
-48%
0.72
-33%
0.67
-24%
0.57 (0.54 - 0.6, n=2)
-6%
0.879 (0.2 - 3.4, n=750)
-63%
Idle Average *
0.95
1.18
-24%
2.41
-154%
1.7
-79%
1.5
-58%
2.16
-127%
1.26
-33%
1.075 (0.95 - 1.2, n=2)
-13%
1.733 (0.6 - 6.2, n=749)
-82%
Idle Maximum *
1.08
1.2
-11%
2.43
-125%
2.1
-94%
1.7
-57%
2.17
-101%
1.29
-19%
1.24 (1.08 - 1.4, n=2)
-15%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=750)
-87%
Load Average *
2.7
3.04
-13%
4.57
-69%
5.1
-89%
5.9
-119%
3.32
-23%
3.71
-37%
3.85 (2.7 - 5, n=2)
-43%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=744)
-50%
Load Maximum *
5.4
4.83
11%
7.57
-40%
7.9
-46%
8.3
-54%
5.34
1%
9.3
-72%
6.25 (5.4 - 7.1, n=2)
-16%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=744)
-9%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
35h 38min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
16h 31min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
20h 08min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 18min
Xiaomi Mi 9T
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
3070 mAh
Huawei P30 Lite
3340 mAh
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Sony Xperia 10
2870 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
-33%
-39%
-28%
-19%
-39%
-28%
Reader / Idle
2138
1374
-36%
1248
-42%
1587
-26%
1006
-53%
1650
-23%
H.264
1208
853
-29%
685
-43%
809
-33%
869
-28%
620
-49%
1008
-17%
WiFi v1.3
991
510
-49%
515
-48%
715
-28%
701
-29%
541
-45%
546
-45%
Load
258
218
-16%
198
-23%
196
-24%
275
7%
233
-10%
194
-25%

Pro

+ Design com aparência premium
+ Tela sem entalhes
+ Conector para fones de 3,5 mm
+ Bom desempenho do Wi-Fi
+ GPS preciso
+ Dual SIM
+ Widevine DRM L1
+ Fotos impressionantes sob boa iluminação
+ Sensor de digitais veloz
+ Reconhecimento facial rápido
+ Tela AMOLED vibrante
+ SoC de gama média veloz
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Bateria de carga rápida

Contra

- Sem certificação de resistência à água ou à poeira
- Sem slot para cartões microSD
- A porta Type-C opera no padrão 2.0 mais lento
- Valor SAR alto
- Fotos inimagináveis sob pouca iluminação
- PWM
- Sem carregamento sem fio
- Comparativamente caro
The Xiaomi Mi 9T smartphone review. Test device courtesy of Xiaomi Austria and TradingShenzhen.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T smartphone review. Test device courtesy of Xiaomi Austria and TradingShenzhen.

Xiaomi certamente traz novos smartphones para o mercado rapidamente. O Mi 9T segue o Mi 9 e Mi 9 SE, o esquema de nomenclatura que pode tornar os três dispositivos difíceis de distinguir. No entanto, o Mi 9T é mais do que apenas um Mi 9 melhorado.

O Xiaomi Mi 9T tem ótima duração da bateria, uma câmera selfie pop-up, uma ótima tela e um desempenho sólido. No geral, o 9T oferece mais do que a maioria dos smartphones de gama média, além de dificilmente ser mais barato do que o Mi 9.

Em primeiro lugar, o Mi 9T tem uma tela sem entalhes, com a Xiaomi incorporando uma câmera pop-up frontal virada para a frente para superar os entalhes que o Mi 9 e o Mi 9 SE têm. O Mi 9T também tem uma bateria substancialmente maior do que seus irmãos, o que dá ao dispositivo uma excelente duração de bateria e um conector para fones, algo que o Mi 9 e o Mi 9 SE não têm.

O 9T oferece mais desempenho do que o Mi 9 SE graças ao SoC Snapdragon 730, mas não consegue igualar a potência do Snapdragon 855 no Mi 9. O 9T tem o mesmo tamanho de tela que o Mi 9, que é 0,46 polegadas maior que o do Mi 9 SE. Os três dispositivos vêm com 6 GB de RAM.

Um ponto de atrito do Mi 9T é o seu preço. O modelo de 64 GB custa € 69 (~ US $ 77) mais barato que o Mi 9, que possui câmeras melhores e um SoC mais potente. Depois, há o Mi 9T Pro, também vendido como o Redmi K20 Pro, que também vem com um Snapdragon 855. Em suma, o Mi 9T é simultaneamente um excelente smartphone de gama média e uma venda difícil para a Xiaomi principalmente devido ao resto da série Mi 9.

Xiaomi Mi 9T - 07/22/2019 v6
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
85%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 89%
Mouse
92%
Conectividade
43 / 60 → 71%
Peso
89%
Bateria
100%
Pantalha
89%
Desempenho do jogos
59 / 63 → 94%
Desempenho da aplicação
73 / 70 → 100%
Temperatura
94%
Ruído
100%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Camera
77%
Médio
80%
88%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi 9T: Um dispositivo de gama média com recorde de duração de bateria
Manuel Masiero, 2019-07-25 (Update: 2019-07-26)