Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi 9T: Um dispositivo de gama média com recorde de duração de bateria

Name: Xiaomi Mi 9T
Brand: Xiaomi

Mi 9 o terceiro. Depois do Mi 9 e Mi 9 SE vem o Mi 9T, um dispositivo que leva a série Mi 9 em uma direção diferente. O 9T herdou muitos recursos do Mi 9, mas se destaca com sua câmera selfie pop-up, uma bateria de 4.000 mAh e um conector de fones de 3,5 mm. Leia para descobrir como o 9T se compara aos seus irmãos Mi 9.

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 07/25/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Mi 9T (Mi 9 Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 470 Gold / Silver

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 618

Memória

6 GB

, LPDDR4X

Pantalha

6.39 polegadas 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, Multitouch de 10 pontos, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Cobertura de espaço de cor 103,8% NTSC, Brilhante: sim, HDR

Disco rígido

64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 64 GB

, 52.7 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones e microfone de 3,5 mm, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, e-compass, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi Display, aptX, aptX HD, dual-SIM VoLTE, Camera2 API Level 3, DRM Widevine L1

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. UMTS: 850, 900, 1,700, 1,900, 2,100 MHz. LTE/FDD: Bandas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28. LTE/TDD: Bands 38, 40. SAR values: Body – 1.511 W/kg, Head - 1.341 W/kg., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.8 x 156.7 x 74.3

Bateria

4000 mAh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix Sony IMX582, 1.6 μm, f/1.75. 8 MP telephoto lens, 1.12 μm, f/2.4. 13 MP ultra-wide-angle lens, 1.12 μm, f/2.4, 2x optical zoom, 10x digital zoom. Videos up to 3,840 x 2,160 at 30 FPS.
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix Câmera pop-up, 0.8 μm, f/2.2.

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono no lado inferior do dispositivo, Teclado: virtual, Fonte de alimentação modular de 18 W (5 V/3 A, 9 V/2 A, 12 V/1.5 A), cabo USB Type-A para Type-C, carcaça portetora, SIM tool, guia de início rápido, MIUI 10, 12 Meses Garantia, fanless

peso

191 g, Suprimento de energia: 40 g

Preço

380 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Mi 9T Adreno 618, SD 730, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	293 (161^min - 346^max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash	288 (138^min - 294^max) MBit/s -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Adreno 616, SD 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	279 (229^min - 303^max) MBit/s -5%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	272 (250^min - 285^max) MBit/s -7%
Sony Xperia 10 Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	253 (128^min - 283^max) MBit/s -14%
Huawei P30 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	218 (95^min - 239^max) MBit/s -26%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	376 MBit/s +13%
Sony Xperia 10 Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash	334 (326^min - 341^max) MBit/s 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Adreno 618, SD 730, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	333 (297^min - 343^max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash	332 (314^min - 341^max) MBit/s 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Adreno 616, SD 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	311 (214^min - 346^max) MBit/s -7%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	294 (278^min - 302^max) MBit/s -12%
Huawei P30 Lite Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	188 (45^min - 237^max) MBit/s -44%

Xiaomi Mi 9T; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø333 (297-343)

Xiaomi Mi 9T; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø293 (161-346)

GPS test: Xiaomi Mi 9T – Cycling around a lake

GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cycling around a lake

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


579 cd/m²	581 cd/m²	591 cd/m²
586 cd/m²	589 cd/m²	594 cd/m²
591 cd/m²	588 cd/m²	601 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 601 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 588.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.68 cd/m²
iluminação: 96 %
iluminação com acumulador: 589 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
95.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24

	Xiaomi Mi 9T AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE AMOLED, 2340x1080, 5.97	Xiaomi Mi 9 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39	Huawei P30 Lite IPS LCD, 2312x1080, 6.15	Motorola Moto G7 Plus IPS, 2270x1080, 6.20	Samsung Galaxy A50 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.40	Sony Xperia 10 IPS-LCD, 2520x1080, 6.00
Screen		-3%	21%	-10%	-105%	-23%	-66%
Brightness middle	589	583 -1%	593 1%	451 -23%	537 -9%	644 9%	547 -7%
Brightness	589	577 -2%	587 0%	430 -27%	525 -11%	628 7%	525 -11%
Brightness Distribution	96	97 1%	94 -2%	90 -6%	85 -11%	91 -5%	93 -3%
Black Level *				0.55	0.58		0.36
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.5	1.6 36%	0.9 64%	1.4 44%	6.41 -156%	2.64 -6%	4.6 -84%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.9	3.9 20%	2 59%	4.4 10%	10.86 -122%	9.23 -88%	12.1 -147%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.6	2.7 -69%	1.5 6%	2.5 -56%	6.7 -319%	2.5 -56%	3.9 -144%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	2.27 ^97%	2.27 ^97%	2.22 ^99%	2.099 ^105%	2.024 ^109%	2.17 ^101%
CCT	6544 ^99%	6267 ^104%	6548 ^99%	6422 ^101%	8310 ^78%	6649 ^98%	7158 ^91%
Contrast				820	926		1519

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

245.1 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 245.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 245.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2527 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1875 Points -26%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1544 Points -39%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1337 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1721 Points -32%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	837 Points -67%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3523 Points +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2436 - 2527, n=2)	2482 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (934 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years)	5228 Points +107%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	6871 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	5975 Points -13%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	5429 Points -21%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4992 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5605 Points -18%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	3986 Points -42%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10999 Points +60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (6826 - 6871, n=2)	6849 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years)	14045 Points +104%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	7795 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	7282 Points -7%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	3551 Points -54%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4287 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	4913 Points -37%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	3763 Points -52%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7482 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (7795 - 7881, n=2)	7838 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 18432, n=72, last 2 years)	10872 Points +39%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	9049 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	8346 Points -8%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	8125 Points -10%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	7618 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	7029 Points -22%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	4948 Points -45%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10985 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (8626 - 9075, n=4)	8909 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)	15091 Points +67%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	7533 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	6832 Points -9%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6483 Points -14%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6277 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5827 Points -23%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	5987 Points -21%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9035 Points +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (7177 - 7913, n=4)	7599 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)	10872 Points +44%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	35557 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	29316 Points -18%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	18377 Points -48%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	19525 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	16037 Points -55%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	16290 Points -54%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	62225 Points +75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (35557 - 40105, n=4)	38270 Points +8%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	46605 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	43514 Points -7%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	21643 Points -54%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	20953 Points -55%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	16593 Points -64%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	17878 Points -62%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	106534 Points +129%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (46605 - 52736, n=4)	50758 Points +9%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	19433 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	13686 Points -30%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	12023 Points -38%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	15766 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	14353 Points -26%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	12437 Points -36%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	25339 Points +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (19389 - 21898, n=4)	20581 Points +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3196 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2073 Points -35%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1414 Points -56%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1430 Points -55%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1315 Points -59%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7166 Points +124%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2950 - 3547, n=4)	3277 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)	3766 Points +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3184 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1980 Points -38%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1256 Points -61%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1279 Points -60%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1235 Points -61%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9963 Points +213%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2999 - 3604, n=4)	3316 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)	4186 Points +31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3239 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2480 Points -23%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2490 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2432 Points -25%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1687 Points -48%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3614 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2792 - 3362, n=4)	3151 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)	3082 Points -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3312 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2217 Points -33%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1494 Points -55%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1667 Points -50%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1375 Points -58%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7449 Points +125%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (3002 - 3644, n=4)	3359 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)	9351 Points +182%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3316 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2146 Points -35%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1336 Points -60%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1553 Points -53%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1299 Points -61%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10291 Points +210%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (3101 - 3741, n=4)	3448 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)	16352 Points +393%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3296 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2506 Points -24%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2578 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2241 Points -32%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1732 Points -47%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3788 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2702 - 3339, n=4)	3091 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)	4426 Points +34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2192 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2073 Points -5%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	963 Points -56%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1296 Points -41%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	809 Points -63%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5509 Points +151%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2192 - 2469, n=4)	2379 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=105, last 2 years)	2755 Points +26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2008 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1980 Points -1%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	819 Points -59%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1149 Points -43%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	704 Points -65%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6355 Points +216%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2008 - 2299, n=4)	2212 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=105, last 2 years)	2751 Points +37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3227 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2480 Points -23%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2489 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2351 Points -27%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1645 Points -49%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3758 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (3210 - 3331, n=4)	3246 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=105, last 2 years)	3163 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2347 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2217 Points -6%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	981 Points -58%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1328 Points -43%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	896 Points -62%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5913 Points +152%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2214 - 2619, n=4)	2437 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=182, last 2 years)	6737 Points +187%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2176 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2146 Points -1%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	843 Points -61%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1188 Points -45%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	792 Points -64%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7076 Points +225%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2085 - 2465, n=4)	2291 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=181, last 2 years)	9723 Points +347%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3241 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2506 Points -23%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2550 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2266 Points -30%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1664 Points -49%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3754 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2827 - 3349, n=4)	3144 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (938 - 8480, n=181, last 2 years)	4224 Points +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2060 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1988 Points -3%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	Points -100%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	861 Points -58%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4914 Points +139%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (1851 - 2302, n=4)	2119 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6439, n=99, last 2 years)	2671 Points +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	1917 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1907 Points -1%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	693 Points -64%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5723 Points +199%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (1731 - 2180, n=4)	1997 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=99, last 2 years)	2850 Points +49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2786 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2338 Points -16%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	2167 Points -22%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3288 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2445 - 2862, n=4)	2700 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 3525, n=99, last 2 years)	2675 Points -4%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	58 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	58 fps 0%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	31 fps -47%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	35 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	36 fps -38%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	25 fps -57%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (55 - 59, n=4)	57.8 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)	84.6 fps +46%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	77 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	74 fps -4%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	33 fps -57%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	36 fps -53%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	39 fps -49%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	29 fps -62%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	167 fps +117%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (67 - 84, n=4)	78 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)	247 fps +221%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	34 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	33 fps -3%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	16 fps -53%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	15 fps -56%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	21 fps -38%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	11 fps -68%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps +76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (31 - 37, n=4)	34.5 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)	72.2 fps +112%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	38 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	36 fps -5%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	17 fps -55%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	16 fps -58%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	23 fps -39%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	13 fps -66%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	100 fps +163%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (34 - 42, n=4)	38.8 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years)	140.6 fps +270%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	24 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	24 fps 0%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	11 fps -54%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	9.8 fps -59%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	13 fps -46%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	7.8 fps -67%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	58 fps +142%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (22 - 27, n=4)	24.8 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)	60.9 fps +154%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	27 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	26 fps -4%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	12 fps -56%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	10 fps -63%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	14 fps -48%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	9.5 fps -65%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	69 fps +156%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (24 - 30, n=4)	27.8 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)	99 fps +267%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	13 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	13 fps 0%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6.5 fps -50%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6 fps -54%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.1 fps -38%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	4.3 fps -67%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	38 fps +192%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (12 - 15, n=4)	13.8 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)	43.4 fps +234%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	16 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	15 fps -6%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6.9 fps -57%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6.3 fps -61%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.9 fps -44%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	5.3 fps -67%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps +163%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (14 - 17, n=4)	16 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)	59.9 fps +274%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	15 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	14 fps -7%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	6.4 fps -57%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	5.6 fps -63%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.2 fps -45%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	4.4 fps -71%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37 fps +147%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (13 - 16, n=4)	15 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=226, last 2 years)	44 fps +193%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	16 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	16 fps 0%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	7 fps -56%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	5.4 fps -66%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	9 fps -44%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	4.9 fps -69%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	41 fps +156%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (15 - 18, n=4)	16.8 fps +5%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 229, n=226, last 2 years)	64.3 fps +302%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	9.3 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	9.1 fps -2%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	4.2 fps -55%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2 fps -78%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	4.9 fps -47%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	2.7 fps -71%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	24 fps +158%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (8.3 - 10, n=4)	9.4 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 119, n=226, last 2 years)	32.8 fps +253%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	6.1 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	5.8 fps -5%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2.6 fps -57%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2.3 fps -62%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	3.1 fps -49%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1.7 fps -72%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	16 fps +162%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (5.4 - 6.8, n=4)	6.25 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 94, n=226, last 2 years)	25.6 fps +320%

Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	15.51 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	14.18 (8.4^min - 36.6^max) fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	13.03 fps -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	35.63 fps +130%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 ()	15.5 fps 0%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	13.56 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	12.76 (7.68^min - 27.7^max) fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	11.59 fps -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	32.2 fps +137%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 ()	13.6 fps 0%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	16.91 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	14.23 (8.05^min - 26.52^max) fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	14.51 fps -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37.41 fps +121%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 ()	16.9 fps 0%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	210836 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	179353 Points -15%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	132834 Points -37%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	117557 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	144194 Points -32%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	88287 Points -58%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	374820 Points +78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (202586 - 210836, n=2)	206711 Points -2%

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	2000 Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1966 Score -2%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1656 Score -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4964 Score +148%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 ()	2000 Score 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=12, last 2 years)	5985 Score +199%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3329 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2906 Points -13%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2201 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2193 Points -34%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1374 Points -59%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4595 Points +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2972 - 3539, n=4)	3242 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)	5759 Points +73%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	6760 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	5932 Points -12%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	5146 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5112 Points -24%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	3159 Points -53%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8441 Points +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (6426 - 6760, n=4)	6569 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)	9672 Points +43%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	4646 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	2969 Points -36%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	3036 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2492 Points -46%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	983 Points -79%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4031 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (3435 - 4646, n=4)	4007 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)	6267 Points +35%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	3559 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	3453 Points -3%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1478 Points -58%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1957 Points -45%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	1409 Points -60%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9270 Points +160%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (3175 - 3875, n=4)	3616 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)	14220 Points +300%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	1099 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	1172 Points +7%
Huawei P30 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1024 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	927 Points -16%
Sony Xperia 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072	815 Points -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1378 Points +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (1099 - 1366, n=4)	1171 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)	1495 Points +36%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9T Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144	603 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144	517 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	504 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1415 Points +135%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 ()	603 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (177 - 6114, n=58, last 2 years)	2240 Points +271%

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)	106.1 Points +125%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)	57.2 Points +21%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)	47.13 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (36.6 - 50.1, n=4)	43.5 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	37.21 Points -21%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	31.78 Points -33%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)	16.25 Points -66%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)	107.1 runs/min +131%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	65.7 runs/min +41%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)	46.46 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (32.8 - 46.5, n=4)	39.9 runs/min -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	37.5 runs/min -19%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chome 73)	33.07 runs/min -29%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	31.7 runs/min -32%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)	133.1 Points +55%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	108 Points +26%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)	86 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (60 - 86, n=4)	73 Points -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	72 Points -16%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	66 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)	62 Points -28%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus	54 Points -37%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)	39 Points -55%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years)	33503 Points +91%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	24534 Points +40%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)	17501 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (12771 - 17501, n=4)	15757 Points -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	13562 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)	10322 Points -41%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	9779 Points -44%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus	8368 Points -52%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)	4865 Points -72%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)	10257 ms * -300%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus	4776 ms * -86%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)	4138 ms * -61%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)	3897 ms * -52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2564 - 3436, n=4)	2950 ms * -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)	2912 ms * -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)	2564 ms *
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	1873 ms * +27%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)	1595 ms * +38%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Mi 9T	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE	Huawei P30 Lite	Motorola Moto G7 Plus	Samsung Galaxy A50	Sony Xperia 10	Xiaomi Mi 9	Average 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-21%	-29%	-25%	-24%	-40%	55%	-8%	244%
Sequential Read 256KB	492.7	492.5 0%	293.2 -40%	283.6 -42%	507 3%	273.8 -44%	666 35%	512 ?(272 - 687, n=17) 4%	1508 ?(226 - 4512, n=218, last 2 years) 206%
Sequential Write 256KB	179.2	190.1 6%	158.6 -11%	208.7 16%	192.1 7%	232.9 30%	388.3 117%	180.8 ?(94.2 - 251, n=17) 1%	1118 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=218, last 2 years) 524%
Random Read 4KB	128.6	115.8 -10%	71.6 -44%	76.6 -40%	98.9 -23%	53.1 -59%	149.4 16%	114.2 ?(60.6 - 157.2, n=17) -11%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=218, last 2 years) 92%
Random Write 4KB	107.8	21.86 -80%	87.3 -19%	73.1 -32%	18.2 -83%	14.39 -87%	165.3 53%	80.1 ?(13.6 - 195.8, n=17) -26%	272 ?(13 - 709, n=218, last 2 years) 152%

Xiaomi Mi 9T; Asphalt 9: Legends; 1.6.3a: Ø28.8 (27-31)

Xiaomi Mi 9T; Arena of Valor; 1.30.2.4: Ø59.8 (23-61)

Xiaomi Mi 9T; Shadow Fight 3; 1.18.5: Ø58.5 (1-61)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


35.4 °C	34.8 °C	31.3 °C
34.9 °C	34.3 °C	31.4 °C
33.7 °C	33.6 °C	31.3 °C

Máximo: 35.4 °C
Médio: 33.4 °C


30 °C	32.1 °C	34.7 °C
29.6 °C	30.8 °C	34.4 °C
29.1 °C	31.4 °C	32.2 °C

Máximo: 34.7 °C
Médio: 31.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 25.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Mi 9T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Mi 9 SE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.02 / 0.19 Watt
Ocioso	0.54 / 0.95 / 1.08 Watt
Carga	2.7 / 5.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Xiaomi Mi 9T 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE 3070 mAh	Huawei P30 Lite 3340 mAh	Motorola Moto G7 Plus 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A50 4000 mAh	Sony Xperia 10 2870 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-7%	-91%	-82%	-67%	-57%	-37%	-33%	-66%
Idle Minimum *	0.54	0.53 2%	0.91 -69%	1.1 -104%	0.8 -48%	0.72 -33%	0.67 -24%	0.643 ?(0.54 - 0.8, n=4) -19%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) -66%
Idle Average *	0.95	1.18 -24%	2.41 -154%	1.7 -79%	1.5 -58%	2.16 -127%	1.26 -33%	1.235 ?(0.95 - 1.49, n=4) -30%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) -53%
Idle Maximum *	1.08	1.2 -11%	2.43 -125%	2.1 -94%	1.7 -57%	2.17 -101%	1.29 -19%	1.448 ?(1.08 - 1.8, n=4) -34%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) -51%
Load Average *	2.7	3.04 -13%	4.57 -69%	5.1 -89%	5.9 -119%	3.32 -23%	3.71 -37%	4.28 ?(2.7 - 5, n=4) -59%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -106%
Load Maximum *	5.4	4.83 11%	7.57 -40%	7.9 -46%	8.3 -54%	5.34 1%	9.3 -72%	6.65 ?(5.4 - 7.11, n=4) -23%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) -54%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		35h 38min
WiFi Websurfing		16h 31min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		20h 08min
Carga (máximo brilho)		4h 18min

	Xiaomi Mi 9T 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 SE 3070 mAh	Huawei P30 Lite 3340 mAh	Motorola Moto G7 Plus 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A50 4000 mAh	Sony Xperia 10 2870 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh
Battery Runtime		-33%	-39%	-28%	-19%	-39%	-28%
Reader / Idle	2138	1374 -36%	1248 -42%		1587 -26%	1006 -53%	1650 -23%
H.264	1208	853 -29%	685 -43%	809 -33%	869 -28%	620 -49%	1008 -17%
WiFi v1.3	991	510 -49%	515 -48%	715 -28%	701 -29%	541 -45%	546 -45%
Load	258	218 -16%	198 -23%	196 -24%	275 7%	233 -10%	194 -25%

Pro

+ Design com aparência premium

+ Tela sem entalhes

+ Conector para fones de 3,5 mm

+ Bom desempenho do Wi-Fi

+ GPS preciso

+ Dual SIM

+ Widevine DRM L1

+ Fotos impressionantes sob boa iluminação

+ Sensor de digitais veloz

+ Reconhecimento facial rápido

+ Tela AMOLED vibrante

+ SoC de gama média veloz

+ Longa duração da bateria

+ Bateria de carga rápida

Contra

- Sem certificação de resistência à água ou à poeira

- Sem slot para cartões microSD

- A porta Type-C opera no padrão 2.0 mais lento

- Valor SAR alto

- Fotos inimagináveis sob pouca iluminação

- PWM

- Sem carregamento sem fio

- Comparativamente caro

The Xiaomi Mi 9T smartphone review. Test device courtesy of Xiaomi Austria and TradingShenzhen.

Xiaomi certamente traz novos smartphones para o mercado rapidamente. O Mi 9T segue o Mi 9 e Mi 9 SE, o esquema de nomenclatura que pode tornar os três dispositivos difíceis de distinguir. No entanto, o Mi 9T é mais do que apenas um Mi 9 melhorado.

O Xiaomi Mi 9T tem ótima duração da bateria, uma câmera selfie pop-up, uma ótima tela e um desempenho sólido. No geral, o 9T oferece mais do que a maioria dos smartphones de gama média, além de dificilmente ser mais barato do que o Mi 9.

Em primeiro lugar, o Mi 9T tem uma tela sem entalhes, com a Xiaomi incorporando uma câmera pop-up frontal virada para a frente para superar os entalhes que o Mi 9 e o Mi 9 SE têm. O Mi 9T também tem uma bateria substancialmente maior do que seus irmãos, o que dá ao dispositivo uma excelente duração de bateria e um conector para fones, algo que o Mi 9 e o Mi 9 SE não têm.

O 9T oferece mais desempenho do que o Mi 9 SE graças ao SoC Snapdragon 730, mas não consegue igualar a potência do Snapdragon 855 no Mi 9. O 9T tem o mesmo tamanho de tela que o Mi 9, que é 0,46 polegadas maior que o do Mi 9 SE. Os três dispositivos vêm com 6 GB de RAM.

Um ponto de atrito do Mi 9T é o seu preço. O modelo de 64 GB custa € 69 (~ US $ 77) mais barato que o Mi 9, que possui câmeras melhores e um SoC mais potente. Depois, há o Mi 9T Pro, também vendido como o Redmi K20 Pro, que também vem com um Snapdragon 855. Em suma, o Mi 9T é simultaneamente um excelente smartphone de gama média e uma venda difícil para a Xiaomi principalmente devido ao resto da série Mi 9.

Xiaomi Mi 9T - 2022-09-03 09/03/2022 v7
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento

83%

Teclado

67 / 75 → 89%

Mouse

92%

Conectividade

45 / 70 → 64%

Peso

89%

Bateria

91%

Pantalha

90%

Desempenho do jogos

26 / 64 → 41%

Desempenho da aplicação

67 / 86 → 78%

Temperatura

94%

Ruído

100%

Audio

76 / 90 → 85%

Camera

65%

Médio

76%

82%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 9924 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi 9T: Um dispositivo de gama média com recorde de duração de bateria

Manuel Masiero, 2019-07-25 (Update: 2019-07-26)

Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi 9T: Um dispositivo de gama média com recorde de duração de bateria

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Xiaomi Mi 9T audio analysis

Xiaomi Mi 9 SE audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare