Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A50

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 04/22/2019

Diversão de foto tripla? Câmeras traseiras triplas e uma tela AMOLED brilhante em um smartphone de gama média? Isso pode soar como uma mistura inebriante, mas será que o Samsung Galaxy A50 consegue atender às expectativas? Continue lendo esta análise para descobrir.

Samsung Galaxy A50 (Galaxy A Serie)
Processador
Samsung Exynos 9610
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
6.4 polegadas 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, 2.5D curved, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 106 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm headphone jack, Card Reader: up to 512 GB microSD cards, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Accelerometer, compass, gyroscope, proximity sensor, USB Type-C
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900. 3G: B1, B2, B5, B8. 4G: B1, B3, B5, B7, B8, B20, B38, B40, B41., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.7 x 158.5 x 74.7
Bateria
15.2 Wh, 4000 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Samsung Adaptive Fast Charging, 15 W
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 25 MPix , f/1.7, Phase Comparison AF, LED Flash, videos @ 1080p/30 FPS (Camera 1); 8.0 MP, f/2.2, wide-angle lens (camera 2); 5.0 MP, f/2.2, Depth of Field (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 25 MPix , f/2.0
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Mono speaker on the underside of the device, Teclado: virtual keyboard, Charger, USB cable, SIM tool, headphones, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR values: 1.39 W/kg – Body, 0.27 W/kg – Head. LTE Cat.6 (300 MBit/s downloads, 50 MBit/s uploads. FM radio, fanless
peso
166 g
Preço
350 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Galaxy A50

Size Comparison

159.8 mm 76.8 mm 7.5 mm 168 g158.5 mm 74.7 mm 7.7 mm 166 g157 mm 75.3 mm 8.3 mm 176 g157.5 mm 74.67 mm 7.61 mm 173 g149.7 mm 71.2 mm 8 mm 160 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (min: 549, max: 725) MBit/s ∼100% +131%
Nokia 7.1
Adreno 509, 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash
334 (min: 311, max: 342) MBit/s ∼49% +14%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
332 (min: 314, max: 341) MBit/s ∼49% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
294 (min: 278, max: 302) MBit/s ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
279 (min: 265, max: 284) MBit/s ∼41% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=381)
221 MBit/s ∼33% -25%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
534 (min: 430, max: 578) MBit/s ∼100% +96%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
320 (min: 164, max: 362) MBit/s ∼60% +18%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
288 (min: 138, max: 294) MBit/s ∼54% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
272 (min: 250, max: 285) MBit/s ∼51%
Nokia 7.1
Adreno 509, 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash
232 (min: 217, max: 244) MBit/s ∼43% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=381)
212 MBit/s ∼40% -22%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø293 (278-302)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø272 (250-285)
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy A50 - Overview
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy A50 - Overview
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy A50 - Loop
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy A50 - Loop
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy A50 - Bridge
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy A50 - Bridge
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 520 - Loop
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 520 - Loop
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
Our test chart in detail
Our test chart in detail
ColorChecker Passport: The lower half of each area of colour displays the reference colour
ColorChecker Passport: The lower half of each area of colour displays the reference colour
587
cd/m²
600
cd/m²
646
cd/m²
634
cd/m²
644
cd/m²
639
cd/m²
623
cd/m²
638
cd/m²
644
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 646 cd/m² Médio: 628.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.97 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 644 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.64 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
141.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.024
Samsung Galaxy A50
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2
Nokia 7.1
IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84
Xiaomi Mi 9
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Screen
23%
-62%
-96%
29%
Brightness middle
644
570
-11%
537
-17%
577
-10%
593
-8%
Brightness
628
565
-10%
525
-16%
550
-12%
587
-7%
Brightness Distribution
91
93
2%
85
-7%
91
0%
94
3%
Black Level *
0.58
0.36
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.64
1.5
43%
6.41
-143%
7.4
-180%
0.9
66%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.23
3.6
61%
10.86
-18%
15
-63%
2
78%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.5
1.2
52%
6.7
-168%
10.2
-308%
1.5
40%
Gamma
2.024 109%
2.07 106%
2.099 105%
2.29 96%
2.27 97%
CCT
6649 98%
6504 100%
8310 78%
9657 67%
6548 99%
Contrast
926
1603

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 119 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 119 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 119 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9607 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40.6 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4913 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4026 Points ∼54% -18%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4287 Points ∼57% -13%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
4560 Points ∼61% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7482 Points ∼100% +52%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
4913 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (870 - 21070, n=269)
4623 Points ∼62% -6%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5605 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4429 Points ∼40% -21%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4992 Points ∼45% -11%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
4902 Points ∼45% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10999 Points ∼100% +96%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
5605 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=322)
4488 Points ∼41% -20%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1721 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1525 Points ∼43% -11%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1337 Points ∼38% -22%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1333 Points ∼38% -23%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3523 Points ∼100% +105%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
1721 Points ∼49% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (437 - 4824, n=323)
1324 Points ∼38% -23%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5827 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5387 Points ∼60% -8%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6277 Points ∼69% +8%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
5663 Points ∼63% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9035 Points ∼100% +55%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
5827 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6483 - 9974, n=330)
4852 Points ∼54% -17%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
7029 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5625 Points ∼51% -20%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
7618 Points ∼69% +8%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
6343 Points ∼58% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10985 Points ∼100% +56%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
7029 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4290 - 13531, n=499)
5280 Points ∼48% -25%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3288 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2061 - 15735, n=23)
2627 Points ∼80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5723 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (604 - 14536, n=23)
2626 Points ∼46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4914 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0 - 14786, n=25)
2264 Points ∼46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2266 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1845 Points ∼49% -19%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
2310 Points ∼62% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3754 Points ∼100% +66%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
2266 Points ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=346)
1792 Points ∼48% -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1188 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
629 Points ∼9% -47%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
869 Points ∼12% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7076 Points ∼100% +496%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
1188 Points ∼17% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=346)
1535 Points ∼22% +29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1328 Points ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
737 Points ∼12% -45%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1009 Points ∼17% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5913 Points ∼100% +345%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
1328 Points ∼22% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=349)
1431 Points ∼24% +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2241 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1871 Points ∼49% -17%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
2347 Points ∼62% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3788 Points ∼100% +69%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
2241 Points ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4493, n=361)
1769 Points ∼47% -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1553 Points ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
954 Points ∼9% -39%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1396 Points ∼14% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10291 Points ∼100% +563%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
1553 Points ∼15% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=361)
2113 Points ∼21% +36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1667 Points ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1071 Points ∼14% -36%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1534 Points ∼21% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7449 Points ∼100% +347%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
1667 Points ∼22% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 7980, n=362)
1797 Points ∼24% +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2351 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1821 Points ∼48% -23%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
2251 Points ∼60% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3758 Points ∼100% +60%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
2351 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4262, n=420)
1728 Points ∼46% -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1149 Points ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
634 Points ∼10% -45%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
811 Points ∼13% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6355 Points ∼100% +453%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
1149 Points ∼18% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=422)
1271 Points ∼20% +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1296 Points ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
741 Points ∼13% -43%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
945 Points ∼17% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5509 Points ∼100% +325%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
1296 Points ∼24% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=430)
1216 Points ∼22% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2432 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1829 Points ∼51% -25%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
2316 Points ∼64% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3614 Points ∼100% +49%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
2432 Points ∼67% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4240, n=453)
1633 Points ∼45% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1279 Points ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
845 Points ∼8% -34%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1323 Points ∼13% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9963 Points ∼100% +679%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
1279 Points ∼13% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 9983, n=453)
1729 Points ∼17% +35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1430 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
960 Points ∼13% -33%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1462 Points ∼20% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7166 Points ∼100% +401%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
1430 Points ∼20% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7673, n=461)
1483 Points ∼21% +4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14353 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
13914 Points ∼55% -3%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15766 Points ∼62% +10%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
17274 Points ∼68% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25339 Points ∼100% +77%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
14353 Points ∼57% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8253 - 45072, n=615)
13397 Points ∼53% -7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16593 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
15567 Points ∼15% -6%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
20953 Points ∼20% +26%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
20610 Points ∼19% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106534 Points ∼100% +542%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
16593 Points ∼16% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3588 - 162695, n=615)
19336 Points ∼18% +17%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16037 Points ∼26%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
15167 Points ∼24% -5%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
19525 Points ∼31% +22%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
19762 Points ∼32% +23%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
62225 Points ∼100% +288%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
16037 Points ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4164 - 83518, n=616)
16160 Points ∼26% +1%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
39 fps ∼23%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
36 fps ∼22% -8%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
35 fps ∼21% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼100% +328%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
39 fps ∼23% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=640)
33.7 fps ∼20% -14%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
36 fps ∼60%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
35 fps ∼58% -3%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
34 fps ∼57% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +67%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
36 fps ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=643)
26.2 fps ∼44% -27%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼23%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps ∼16% -30%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
16 fps ∼16% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼100% +335%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
23 fps ∼23% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 132, n=559)
18.4 fps ∼18% -20%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
21 fps ∼35%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15 fps ∼25% -29%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
15 fps ∼25% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +186%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
21 fps ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=564)
17.1 fps ∼29% -19%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼20%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
10 fps ∼14% -29%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
10 fps ∼14% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼100% +393%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
14 fps ∼20% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=421)
15.3 fps ∼22% +9%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
13 fps ∼22%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
9.8 fps ∼17% -25%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
9.6 fps ∼17% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +346%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
13 fps ∼22% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=424)
14.7 fps ∼25% +13%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4.9 fps ∼20%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2 fps ∼8% -59%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
3.5 fps ∼15% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼100% +390%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
4.9 fps ∼20% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 59, n=125)
8.92 fps ∼37% +82%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.1 fps ∼19%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2.3 fps ∼14% -26%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
2.2 fps ∼14% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼100% +416%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
3.1 fps ∼19% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=125)
6.2 fps ∼39% +100%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.2 fps ∼22%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.6 fps ∼15% -32%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
5.5 fps ∼15% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼100% +351%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
8.2 fps ∼22% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=126)
13.3 fps ∼36% +62%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9 fps ∼22%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.4 fps ∼13% -40%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
6 fps ∼15% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼100% +356%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
9 fps ∼22% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=125)
14.9 fps ∼36% +66%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.9 fps ∼21%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps ∼15% -29%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
6.3 fps ∼15% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼100% +372%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
8.9 fps ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=350)
10.4 fps ∼25% +17%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.1 fps ∼21%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6 fps ∼16% -26%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
5.9 fps ∼16% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼100% +369%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
8.1 fps ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=354)
9.32 fps ∼25% +15%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
144194 Points ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
122826 Points ∼33% -15%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
117557 Points ∼31% -18%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
116496 Points ∼31% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
374820 Points ∼100% +160%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
144194 Points ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (36768 - 374820, n=242)
126670 Points ∼34% -12%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
927 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1090 Points ∼79% +18%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1046 Points ∼76% +13%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1378 Points ∼100% +49%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
927 Points ∼67% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=573)
726 Points ∼53% -22%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1957 Points ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1356 Points ∼15% -31%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1590 Points ∼17% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9270 Points ∼100% +374%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
1957 Points ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=573)
1866 Points ∼20% -5%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2492 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2445 Points ∼61% -2%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1917 Points ∼48% -23%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4031 Points ∼100% +62%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
2492 Points ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 6283, n=573)
1380 Points ∼34% -45%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5112 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4506 Points ∼53% -12%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
4457 Points ∼53% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8441 Points ∼100% +65%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
5112 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=573)
2752 Points ∼33% -46%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2193 Points ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2009 Points ∼44% -8%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1941 Points ∼42% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4595 Points ∼100% +110%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
2193 Points ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=577)
1365 Points ∼30% -38%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
65.7 runs/min ∼100% +99%
Average of class Smartphone (14.6 - 123, n=24)
44.9 runs/min ∼68% +36%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
33.1 runs/min ∼50% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chome 73)
33.07 runs/min ∼50%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
108 Points ∼100% +74%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 161, n=107)
63.7 Points ∼59% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
62 Points ∼57%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
62 Points ∼57% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
57 Points ∼53% -8%
Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70)
54 Points ∼50% -13%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
54 Points ∼50% -13%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
24534 Points ∼100% +138%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
10322 Points ∼42%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
10322 Points ∼42% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
9165 Points ∼37% -11%
Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70)
8627 Points ∼35% -16%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
8368 Points ∼34% -19%
Average of class Smartphone (3126 - 43280, n=633)
6012 Points ∼25% -42%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=653)
11004 ms * ∼100% -182%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
4776 ms * ∼43% -23%
Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70)
4562.2 ms * ∼41% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
4122.8 ms * ∼37% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
3897 ms * ∼35%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
3897 ms * ∼35% -0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
1873.2 ms * ∼17% +52%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy A50Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Motorola Moto G7 PlusNokia 7.1Xiaomi Mi 9Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-18%
43%
-27%
248%
74%
-32%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
64.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
62.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
61.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
64.7 (51.3 - 72.4, n=13)
7%
47.9 (9.5 - 87.1, n=382)
-21%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
73.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
78.15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
12%
83.49 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13%
79.6 (73.2 - 85.4, n=13)
8%
66 (8.1 - 96.5, n=382)
-11%
Random Write 4KB
18.2
15.45
-15%
73.1
302%
11.93
-34%
165.32
808%
80.3 (18.2 - 250, n=31)
341%
18.9 (0.14 - 250, n=684)
4%
Random Read 4KB
98.9
83.98
-15%
76.6
-23%
44.9
-55%
149.36
51%
136 (98.9 - 158, n=31)
38%
43 (1.59 - 174, n=684)
-57%
Sequential Write 256KB
192.1
104.87
-45%
208.7
9%
125.98
-34%
388.27
102%
198 (183 - 212, n=31)
3%
88.8 (2.99 - 388, n=684)
-54%
Sequential Read 256KB
507.3
295.76
-42%
283.6
-44%
250.9
-51%
666.06
31%
740 (427 - 912, n=31)
46%
250 (12.1 - 1468, n=684)
-51%
0102030405060Tooltip
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.28.2.2: Ø59.8 (55-60)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.28.2.2: Ø59.9 (58-60)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.5.3a: Ø28.9 (24-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.5.3a: Ø29.5 (28-31)
; Shadow Fight 3; high; 1.18.0: Ø59.3 (52-60)
; Shadow Fight 3; minimal; 1.18.0: Ø59.2 (52-60)
Carga Máxima
 42.9 °C37.4 °C34.1 °C 
 41.6 °C37.1 °C34.6 °C 
 40 °C36.9 °C34.3 °C 
Máximo: 42.9 °C
Médio: 37.7 °C
31.7 °C34.7 °C40.7 °C
32 °C35 °C40.1 °C
32.5 °C35.9 °C38.1 °C
Máximo: 40.7 °C
Médio: 35.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  39.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.246.72542.143.93134.636.74037.342.75039.8456332.736.48027.729.310027.83112525.734.316023.340.22002344.225021.449.231521.455.740020.161.650020.563.463021.869.580020.472.110002074.6125018.273.9160018.972.920001874250019.174.5315018.276.740001871.250001968.263001872.4800018.1751000018.166.41250018.252.31600018.148.3SPL65.965.66267.731.385N18.518.514.623.11.662.7median 19.1median 68.2Delta1.811.930.733.82528.726.828.426.328.729.838.227.424.72123.219.525.818.825.719.240.417.641.316.947.415.855.51556.71562.814.766.914.86814.666.514.369.213.471.814.472.514.473.214.876.61577.714.875.314.774.31575.314.972.815.264.515.755.126.885.50.961.4median 15median 66.91.210.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A50Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A50 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.8 / 1.5 / 1.7 Watt
Carga midlight 5.9 / 8.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
3000 mAh
Nokia 7.1
3060 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
10%
-11%
-7%
16%
0%
3%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
0.71
11%
1.1
-38%
1.01
-26%
0.67
16%
0.8
-0%
0.883 (0.2 - 3.4, n=714)
-10%
Idle Average *
1.5
1.36
9%
1.7
-13%
2.2
-47%
1.26
16%
1.5
-0%
1.735 (0.6 - 6.2, n=713)
-16%
Idle Maximum *
1.7
1.47
14%
2.1
-24%
2.25
-32%
1.29
24%
1.7
-0%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=714)
-19%
Load Average *
5.9
5.13
13%
5.1
14%
3.76
36%
3.71
37%
5.9
-0%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=708)
31%
Load Maximum *
8.3
7.89
5%
7.9
5%
5.56
33%
9.3
-12%
8.3
-0%
5.85 (1.2 - 14.2, n=708)
30%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
26h 27min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 41min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 29min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 35min
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
3000 mAh
Nokia 7.1
3060 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
-7%
-11%
-44%
-8%
Reader / Idle
1587
1467
-8%
983
-38%
1650
4%
H.264
869
836
-4%
809
-7%
507
-42%
1008
16%
WiFi v1.3
701
605
-14%
715
2%
346
-51%
546
-22%
Load
275
273
-1%
196
-29%
156
-43%
194
-29%

Pro

+ decent performance
+ great display
+ strong battery life
+ dedicated microSD slot
+ modern design

Contra

- imprecise fingerprint reader
- inaccurate GPS
- fixed focus front-facing camera
- preinstalled advertising apps
Samsung Galaxy A50 smartphone review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.
Samsung Galaxy A50 smartphone review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.

The Samsung Galaxy A50 is an excellent midrange smartphone. It draws on the successes of its predecessor, like with its triple rear-facing cameras, but it blends these with a more modern design and an improved SoC.

The A50 has few shortcomings, although its fingerprint sensor takes longer to recognise fingers and has a lower detection rate than conventional sensors do. Moreover, its GPS module is oddly inaccurate and its Wi-Fi performance on occasion was worse than its predecessor.

Great screen, long battery life, decent cameras. The Samsung Galaxy A50 delivers in all key areas and is a triumph of a midrange smartphone.

Samsung has also compromised on some areas like limiting LTE performance below what the SoC can achieve, which seems arbitrary. The inclusion of a fixed focus front-facing sensor makes little sense too.

With that said, the A50 makes real strides in other areas compared to the Galaxy A7 (2018). The Exynos 9610 is a big leap from the Exynos 7885, and it even edges out comparable Snapdragon chips. Samsung has included an approximately 20% larger battery too, which helps the A50 deliver better runtimes than its predecessor.

Overall, the Galaxy A50 would be an excellent choice for anyone looking for a smartphone that costs around 350 Euros (~$392). However, last year’s Galaxy A7 (2018) offers almost the same experience in an older design at a fraction of the cost.

Samsung Galaxy A50 - 04/18/2019 v6
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
84%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
94%
Conectividade
44 / 60 → 74%
Peso
91%
Bateria
95%
Pantalha
90%
Desempenho do jogos
53 / 63 → 84%
Desempenho da aplicação
62 / 70 → 89%
Temperatura
89%
Ruído
100%
Audio
59 / 91 → 65%
Camera
73%
Médio
77%
87%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy A50
Florian Schmitt, 2019-04-22 (Update: 2019-04-25)