Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Sven Kloevekorn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 06/03/2018

Primeira Liga. Um SoC Snapdragon 845, até 8 GB de RAM, um sistema de câmera dupla e uma tela de 6 polegadas - com seu equipamento de primeira linha, o Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S entra na competição direta contra os maiores concorrentes, como o iPhone X da Apple. Nosso teste mostra se o atual carro chefe da Xiaomi pode realmente agitar o setor dos smartphones de gama alta.

Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Mi Serie)
Placa gráfica
Memória
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4
Pantalha
5.99 polegadas 18:9, 2160 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, IPS, razão de tela-corpo de 81,9%, Corning Gorilla Glass 4, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 116.6 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Adaptador de áudio de 3,5 via USB-C, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: sensor de aceleração, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, sensor de digitais, USB OTG, WiFi Direct, Qualcomm Quick Charge 3, Qi Wireless Charging
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 18 (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20), downloads up to 1.2 GBit/s, 2x Nano-SIM, head SAR 0.542 W/kg, body SAR 1.593 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.1 x 150.9 x 74.9
Bateria
3400 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix dual camera 12 MP (f/1.8, 1/2.55", 1.4 µm) + 12 MP (f/2.4, 1/2.9", 1.0 µm), estabilização de 4 eixos, dual-pixel auto-focus, multiframe noise reduction, câmera lenta de 240 FPS
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.0; 1.4 µm
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Um só alto-falante no lado inferior, Teclado: virtual, carregador modular, cabo USB (Type A para Type C), áudio de 3,5 mm via adaptador USB-C, ferramenta SIM, capa protetora, manual de início rápido, MIUI 9.5, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
189 g, Suprimento de energia: 45 g
Preço
799 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
939 MBit/s ∼100% +44%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
669 MBit/s ∼71% +2%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB eMMC Flash
656 MBit/s ∼70% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
654 MBit/s ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
652 MBit/s ∼69% 0%
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
635 MBit/s ∼68% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=295)
200 MBit/s ∼21% -69%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
668 MBit/s ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
633 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB eMMC Flash
585 MBit/s ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
519 MBit/s ∼78% -22%
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
456 MBit/s ∼68% -32%
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
437 MBit/s ∼65% -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=295)
195 MBit/s ∼29% -71%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S: overall route
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S: overall route
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S: lake
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S: lake
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S: turning point
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: overall route
Garmin Edge 500: overall route
Garmin Edge 500: lake
Garmin Edge 500: lake
Garmin Edge 500: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: turning point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
463
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
463
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
492
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
466
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 492 cd/m² Médio: 462.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.35 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 492 cd/m²
Contraste: 834:1 (Preto: 0.59 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
Gamma: 2.25
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99
Apple iPhone X
Super AMOLED, 2436x1125, 5.8
Huawei P20 Pro
OLED, 2240x1080, 6.1
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2
Sony Xperia XZ2
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Screen
37%
37%
22%
36%
15%
Brightness middle
492
600
22%
569
16%
565
15%
630
28%
472
-4%
Brightness
463
606
31%
578
25%
571
23%
632
37%
430
-7%
Brightness Distribution
90
94
4%
95
6%
96
7%
96
7%
87
-3%
Black Level *
0.59
0.44
25%
0.27
54%
Contrast
834
1432
72%
1748
110%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.4
1.2
50%
1.3
46%
2.3
4%
1.5
37%
3.5
-46%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.2
3
52%
2.1
66%
4.8
23%
4.3
31%
5.9
5%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.5
1.6
64%
1.6
64%
1.9
58%
2.1
53%
4
11%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.23 99%
2.31 95%
2.16 102%
2.17 101%
2.29 96%
CCT
6395 102%
6707 97%
6401 102%
6332 103%
6513 100%
7048 92%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 1168 Hz ≤ 36 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1168 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 36 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1168 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8651 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
25.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.6 ms rise
↘ 16.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 27.6 ms rise
↘ 28.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
162183 Points ∼72%
Apple iPhone X
197851 Points ∼88% +22%
Huawei P20 Pro
179709 Points ∼80% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
222290 Points ∼99% +37%
Sony Xperia XZ2
225663 Points ∼100% +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 242953, n=15)
224454 Points ∼99% +38%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 250848, n=381)
74371 Points ∼33% -54%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
266601 Points ∼97%
Apple iPhone X
256297 Points ∼93% -4%
Huawei P20 Pro
207959 Points ∼76% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
250577 Points ∼91% -6%
Sony Xperia XZ2
266981 Points ∼97% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
204457 Points ∼74% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (246366 - 299878, n=20)
274906 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=160)
115872 Points ∼42% -57%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
8078 Points ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
6982 Points ∼86% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
5319 Points ∼66% -34%
Sony Xperia XZ2
8069 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
7046 Points ∼87% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (8701 - 9868, n=19)
7873 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2829 - 9868, n=243)
4492 Points ∼56% -44%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
9179 Points ∼91%
Huawei P20 Pro
8115 Points ∼81% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
5822 Points ∼58% -37%
Sony Xperia XZ2
9319 Points ∼93% +2%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
8169 Points ∼81% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7998 - 13211, n=17)
10057 Points ∼100% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (3681 - 13211, n=410)
4890 Points ∼49% -47%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
1234 Points ∼73%
Apple iPhone X
1682 Points ∼100% +36%
Huawei P20 Pro
1273 Points ∼76% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
1109 Points ∼66% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ2
1346 Points ∼80% +9%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
1264 Points ∼75% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1009 - 1613, n=15)
1361 Points ∼81% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=485)
689 Points ∼41% -44%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
7918 Points ∼86%
Apple iPhone X
9248 Points ∼100% +17%
Huawei P20 Pro
3725 Points ∼40% -53%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6370 Points ∼69% -20%
Sony Xperia XZ2
7868 Points ∼85% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
5936 Points ∼64% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5846 - 7989, n=15)
7768 Points ∼84% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=485)
1675 Points ∼18% -79%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
3012 Points ∼74%
Apple iPhone X
1219 Points ∼30% -60%
Huawei P20 Pro
4050 Points ∼100% +34%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2625 Points ∼65% -13%
Sony Xperia XZ2
2193 Points ∼54% -27%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
3544 Points ∼88% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2193 - 4798, n=15)
3427 Points ∼85% +14%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=485)
1205 Points ∼30% -60%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
5792 Points ∼56%
Apple iPhone X
10281 Points ∼100% +78%
Huawei P20 Pro
5965 Points ∼58% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6413 Points ∼62% +11%
Sony Xperia XZ2
8402 Points ∼82% +45%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
5822 Points ∼57% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5792 - 8435, n=15)
7735 Points ∼75% +34%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=485)
2435 Points ∼24% -58%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
3614 Points ∼89%
Apple iPhone X
3737 Points ∼92% +3%
Huawei P20 Pro
3271 Points ∼80% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3302 Points ∼81% -9%
Sony Xperia XZ2
3738 Points ∼92% +3%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
3527 Points ∼87% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3489 - 4478, n=15)
4066 Points ∼100% +13%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=489)
1217 Points ∼30% -66%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
8025 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6202 Points ∼43%
Sony Xperia XZ2
14362 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
7750 Points ∼54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (12493 - 14489, n=16)
13824 Points ∼96%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=183)
4438 Points ∼31%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
8937 Points ∼87%
Apple iPhone X
10255 Points ∼100% +15%
Huawei P20 Pro
6756 Points ∼66% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
8963 Points ∼87% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ2
8510 Points ∼83% -5%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
6649 Points ∼65% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7934 - 9182, n=17)
8697 Points ∼85% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=232)
4239 Points ∼41% -53%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
2456 Points ∼58%
Apple iPhone X
4265 Points ∼100% +74%
Huawei P20 Pro
1922 Points ∼45% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3776 Points ∼89% +54%
Sony Xperia XZ2
2464 Points ∼58% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
1943 Points ∼46% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2272 - 2468, n=17)
2426 Points ∼57% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=233)
1252 Points ∼29% -49%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
2606 Points ∼72%
Apple iPhone X
2361 Points ∼65% -9%
Huawei P20 Pro
2926 Points ∼81% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2469 Points ∼68% -5%
Sony Xperia XZ2
3630 Points ∼100% +39%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
2956 Points ∼81% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2118 - 3703, n=19)
3304 Points ∼91% +27%
Average of class Smartphone (549 - 4183, n=340)
1630 Points ∼45% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
5181 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
3463 Points ∼67% -33%
Huawei P20 Pro
3017 Points ∼58% -42%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3582 Points ∼69% -31%
Sony Xperia XZ2
5122 Points ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
4034 Points ∼78% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3488 - 5241, n=19)
4969 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (69 - 5241, n=340)
1175 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
4248 Points ∼91%
Apple iPhone X
3138 Points ∼67% -26%
Huawei P20 Pro
2996 Points ∼64% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3256 Points ∼69% -23%
Sony Xperia XZ2
4693 Points ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
3732 Points ∼80% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3197 - 4734, n=19)
4456 Points ∼95% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (86 - 4734, n=348)
1121 Points ∼24% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
2159 Points ∼59%
Huawei P20 Pro
2885 Points ∼79% +34%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2496 Points ∼69% +16%
Sony Xperia XZ2
3642 Points ∼100% +69%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
2547 Points ∼70% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2159 - 3642, n=18)
3127 Points ∼86% +45%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4150, n=371)
1517 Points ∼42% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
6630 Points ∼82%
Huawei P20 Pro
3335 Points ∼41% -50%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
4637 Points ∼57% -30%
Sony Xperia XZ2
8122 Points ∼100% +23%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
5599 Points ∼69% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5637 - 8312, n=18)
7812 Points ∼96% +18%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 8312, n=371)
1592 Points ∼20% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
4540 Points ∼71%
Huawei P20 Pro
3223 Points ∼51% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3895 Points ∼61% -14%
Sony Xperia XZ2
6378 Points ∼100% +40%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
4422 Points ∼69% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4529 - 6378, n=18)
5837 Points ∼92% +29%
Average of class Smartphone (69 - 6378, n=379)
1354 Points ∼21% -70%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
30245 Points ∼84%
Apple iPhone X
25633 Points ∼71% -15%
Huawei P20 Pro
22441 Points ∼63% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
26226 Points ∼73% -13%
Sony Xperia XZ2
35856 Points ∼100% +19%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
21337 Points ∼60% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (27817 - 36794, n=17)
34083 Points ∼95% +13%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 36794, n=525)
12683 Points ∼35% -58%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
76078 Points ∼68%
Apple iPhone X
112489 Points ∼100% +48%
Huawei P20 Pro
33472 Points ∼30% -56%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
46610 Points ∼41% -39%
Sony Xperia XZ2
80233 Points ∼71% +5%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
57134 Points ∼51% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (76078 - 84998, n=17)
81178 Points ∼72% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=525)
17522 Points ∼16% -77%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
56913 Points ∼89%
Apple iPhone X
64169 Points ∼100% +13%
Huawei P20 Pro
30176 Points ∼47% -47%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
39745 Points ∼62% -30%
Sony Xperia XZ2
62926 Points ∼98% +11%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
41618 Points ∼65% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (56669 - 65330, n=17)
62042 Points ∼97% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=526)
14738 Points ∼23% -74%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
150 fps ∼85%
Apple iPhone X
177.4 fps ∼100% +18%
Huawei P20 Pro
121 fps ∼68% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
147 fps ∼83% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ2
150 fps ∼85% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
102 fps ∼57% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (98 - 152, n=17)
144 fps ∼81% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=549)
30.3 fps ∼17% -80%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
60 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
59.4 fps ∼99% -1%
Huawei P20 Pro
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ2
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (58 - 60, n=16)
59.8 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=552)
24.5 fps ∼41% -59%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
74 fps ∼84%
Apple iPhone X
88.2 fps ∼100% +19%
Huawei P20 Pro
61 fps ∼69% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
74 fps ∼84% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ2
82 fps ∼93% +11%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
49 fps ∼56% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (54 - 83, n=16)
73.5 fps ∼83% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=471)
16.2 fps ∼18% -78%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
59 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
58.5 fps ∼99% -1%
Huawei P20 Pro
54 fps ∼92% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
45 fps ∼76% -24%
Sony Xperia XZ2
59 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
45 fps ∼76% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (35 - 59, n=16)
54.8 fps ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=474)
15.6 fps ∼26% -74%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
60 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
48.9 fps ∼82% -18%
Huawei P20 Pro
39 fps ∼65% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
47 fps ∼78% -22%
Sony Xperia XZ2
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
34 fps ∼57% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (32 - 60.9, n=17)
54.4 fps ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 88, n=335)
13.8 fps ∼23% -77%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
55 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
44.1 fps ∼80% -20%
Huawei P20 Pro
36 fps ∼65% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
24 fps ∼44% -56%
Sony Xperia XZ2
55 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
34 fps ∼62% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (26 - 59, n=16)
48.1 fps ∼87% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 110, n=337)
13.5 fps ∼25% -75%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
35 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
31.8 fps ∼91% -9%
Huawei P20 Pro
23 fps ∼66% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
28 fps ∼80% -20%
Sony Xperia XZ2
35 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
24 fps ∼69% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (25 - 35, n=17)
34.3 fps ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.72 - 54, n=266)
9.64 fps ∼28% -72%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
34 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
27.7 fps ∼81% -19%
Huawei P20 Pro
22 fps ∼65% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
14 fps ∼41% -59%
Sony Xperia XZ2
33 fps ∼97% -3%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
23 fps ∼68% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (17 - 37, n=17)
28.8 fps ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 58, n=269)
8.71 fps ∼26% -74%

Legend

 
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone X Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.5 - 88869, n=18)
5007 Points ∼100% +7077%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 88869, n=408)
254 Points ∼5% +264%
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.1)
224 Points ∼4% +221%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
89.54 Points ∼2% +28%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
69.765 Points ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
69.59 Points ∼1% 0%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
58.255 Points ∼1% -16%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2)
35255 Points ∼100% +143%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
16774 Points ∼48% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=19)
15280 Points ∼43% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
14760 Points ∼42% +2%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
14491 Points ∼41%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
11584 Points ∼33% -20%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (Chrome 53)
10122 Points ∼29% -30%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=544)
5467 Points ∼16% -62%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=563)
11582 ms * ∼100% -304%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
3852.2 ms * ∼33% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=19)
2939 ms * ∼25% -2%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
2868 ms * ∼25%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (Chrome 53)
2712.9 ms * ∼23% +5%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
2394.3 ms * ∼21% +17%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
2059.7 ms * ∼18% +28%
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2)
718 ms * ∼6% +75%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone X (Safari Mobile 11.0)
354 Points ∼100% +55%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
262 Points ∼74% +15%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
228 Points ∼64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (96 - 291, n=18)
223 Points ∼63% -2%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
182 Points ∼51% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
164 Points ∼46% -28%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=275)
108 Points ∼31% -53%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (Chrome 53)
57 Points ∼16% -75%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Mi Mix 2SHuawei P20 ProSamsung Galaxy S9 PlusSony Xperia XZ2Xiaomi Mi Mix 2Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
9%
-20%
-23%
-21%
-6%
-73%
Random Write 4KB
128.36
160.49
25%
22.74
-82%
17
-87%
15.75
-88%
92.5 (20 - 164, n=15)
-28%
15.4 (0.14 - 164, n=594)
-88%
Random Read 4KB
135.14
144.33
7%
129.68
-4%
149.4
11%
148.54
10%
141 (132 - 157, n=15)
4%
37.4 (1.59 - 173, n=594)
-72%
Sequential Write 256KB
208.1
196.69
-5%
204.94
-2%
198.7
-5%
208.62
0%
202 (192 - 212, n=15)
-3%
78.2 (2.99 - 246, n=594)
-62%
Sequential Read 256KB
756.07
831.82
10%
818.69
8%
679.2
-10%
703.99
-7%
768 (692 - 853, n=15)
2%
226 (12.1 - 895, n=594)
-70%
Carga Máxima
 39.2 °C39.5 °C40.3 °C 
 38.7 °C39.2 °C40.3 °C 
 38.5 °C38.2 °C40.6 °C 
Máximo: 40.6 °C
Médio: 39.4 °C
33.7 °C34.7 °C36.3 °C
34 °C35.3 °C36.9 °C
34.6 °C35.1 °C36.6 °C
Máximo: 36.9 °C
Médio: 35.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  34.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.240.72532.9433137.238.14031.736.55039.632.16328.333.58027.332.410026.929.612526.731.8160243820020.945.925020.952.931519.555.440018.559.650017.562.763017.568.680015.769.9100015.870.8125016.673.9160015.871.7200015.472.2250015.571.431501671.4400015.873.450001672.3630016.369.2800016.368.21000016.263.81250016.453.51600016.453.5SPL28.683.1N1.155.1median 16.4median 68.2Delta2.19.827.727.427.727.726.427.725.430.125.430.529.930.530.924.330.923.825.723.82223.42222.923.522.927.727.427.727.221.327.24020.44048.42248.454.220.554.256.620.256.66220.76265.616.765.666.817.966.87018.47072.117.572.173.717.173.774.91574.977.115.377.178.114.578.179.514.179.575.513.975.570.713.870.768.613.968.666.213.966.261.613.861.646.713.746.786.628.686.661.71.161.7median 66.2median 17.1median 66.212.13.312.135.240.532.942.437.233.831.73039.635.128.33127.327.326.930.626.738.62446.820.951.720.955.319.554.218.556.917.561.817.565.315.769.315.872.516.675.215.869.415.471.915.573.91675.315.876.81674.516.370.616.371.316.267.216.459.716.44928.684.91.160.3median 16.4median 67.22.19.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi Mix 2SXiaomi Mi Mix 2Huawei P20 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei P20 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.18 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.75 / 2.25 / 2.26 Watt
Carga midlight 4.89 / 9.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
3400 mAh
Apple iPhone X
2716 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2
3180 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
3771 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
2%
35%
34%
3%
14%
4%
15%
Idle Minimum *
0.75
1.03
-37%
0.84
-12%
0.68
9%
0.72
4%
0.69
8%
0.803 (0.42 - 1.8, n=16)
-7%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=629)
-18%
Idle Average *
2.25
2.4
-7%
1.54
32%
0.95
58%
2.21
2%
2.03
10%
1.789 (1 - 2.9, n=16)
20%
1.722 (0.6 - 6.2, n=628)
23%
Idle Maximum *
2.26
2.6
-15%
1.57
31%
1.09
52%
2.22
2%
2.1
7%
2.19 (1.5 - 3.5, n=16)
3%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=629)
12%
Load Average *
4.89
2.96
39%
2.47
49%
4.58
6%
4.6
6%
3.18
35%
4.91 (3.7 - 7.2, n=16)
-0%
4.03 (0.8 - 10.8, n=623)
18%
Load Maximum *
9.6
6.6
31%
2.49
74%
5.16
46%
9.34
3%
8.73
9%
9.22 (6.2 - 12.3, n=16)
4%
5.72 (1.2 - 14.2, n=623)
40%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
27h 58min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 56min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 58min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 59min
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
3400 mAh
Apple iPhone X
2716 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2
3180 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
3771 mAh
Battery Runtime
-20%
15%
-14%
-13%
-16%
Reader / Idle
1678
1292
-23%
1727
3%
1343
-20%
1402
-16%
H.264
718
634
-12%
784
9%
674
-6%
722
1%
WiFi v1.3
716
564
-21%
744
4%
521
-27%
679
-5%
600
-16%
Load
239
180
-25%
345
44%
237
-1%
159
-33%

Pro

+ SoC muito veloz
+ Carcaça de alta qualidade
+ Dual SIM
+ USB-C
+ Android 8.0 com interface de usuário MIUI 9.5 intuitiva
+ Tela brilhante
+ Câmeras duplas muito boas
+ Não esquenta muito
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Capa protetora incluída

Contra

- USB-C somente com velocidades 2.0
- Sem certificação IP
- Sem slot microSD
- Conexão para fones 3,5 mm somente mediante adaptador USB-C
In review: Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S. Test unit provided by Trading Shenzen Shop.
In review: Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S. Test unit provided by Trading Shenzen Shop.

Assim como o Xiaomi Mi Mix 2, o Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S não apresenta fraquezas que valham a pena mencionar. O acabamento do smartphone Android de 5,99 polegadas é de primeira classe, a tela mostra uma imagem nítida do conteúdo, a configuração de câmera dupla pertence às melhores câmeras de smartphone atualmente, e os módulos de comunicação quase não deixam nada a desejar. Além disso, com o Snapdragon 845 vem um SoC extremamente veloz, tornando a operação do Mi Mix 2S incrivelmente fluente. Enquanto o Android 8.0, que foi modificado via MIUI 9.5, é ligeiramente diferente ao layout de um Android stock, ele pode ser navegado de forma intuitiva e, além disso, oferece alguns extras práticos.

Existem apenas alguns pontos negativos com o atual carro chefe da Xiaomi: A porta USB-C só pode lidar com velocidades USB-2.0 e não há slot microSD. Você pode substituir a porta de fone de ouvido de 3,5 mm usando o adaptador USB incluído. Em contraste com muitos dos rivais de gama alta, o Mi Mix 2S não possui certificação IP, portanto não é protegido contra poeira nem água. Aqueles que receberem o Xiaomi como importação da China, como fizemos, precisam instalar o Google Play, o que não é uma desvantagem, pois pode ser feito rapidamente. 

Um feito de sucesso: Com seu poderoso desempenho geral, o Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S se recomenda como uma boa alternativa para smartphones de gama alta, como o Apple iPhone X, Huawei P20 Pro ou Samsung Galaxy S9+.

Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S - 05/22/2018 v6
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
86%
Teclado
69 / 75 → 92%
Mouse
92%
Conectividade
47 / 60 → 78%
Peso
89%
Bateria
94%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
68 / 63 → 100%
Desempenho da aplicação
73 / 70 → 100%
Temperatura
86%
Ruído
100%
Audio
77 / 91 → 85%
Camera
84%
Médio
81%
88%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Manuel Masiero, 2018-06- 3 (Update: 2018-06-21)