Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia XZ2

Florian Wimmer (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 05/03/2018

Tudo em HDR. HDR é o termo chave para o novo smartphone de gama alta do Xperia XZ2 da Sony: A tela suporta HDR 10 e é capaz de melhorar o conteúdo para HDR, enquanto a câmera pode gravar vídeos em HDR. Isso pode ser visto como uma verdadeira inovação? Eles fizeram o suficiente para competir no mercado?

Sony Xperia XZ2 (Xperia Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 630
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
5.7 polegadas 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 424 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, TRILUMINOS display for mobile, Dynamic Contrast Enhancer, X-Reality for mobile, Bravia TV Upscaling to HDR, HDR 10, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 50 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: audio output via USB-C, Card Reader: microSD de até 400 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, barometer, USB-C 3.1, DLNA, Miracast, USB OTG, aptX, aptX HD
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (800/​850/​900/​1700/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B29/​B32/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B66), LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 11.1 x 153 x 72
Bateria
12.08 Wh, 3180 mAh Lítio-Ion, Quick Charge 3.0
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 19 MPix f/​2.0, contrast AF, laser AF, phase-shift AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, videos @2160p/​30fps, videos @1080p/​960fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/​2.2, videos @1080p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: front-pointing stereo speakers, Teclado: teclado virtual, USB charger, USB cable, adapter USB-C to 3.5mm, headset, 3D Creator, Skizze, Playstation App, AVG Protection, 24 Meses Garantia, bandwidth (download/​upload): 1200Mbps/​150Mbps (LTE); SAR value: 0.56W/​kg (head), 0.94W/​kg (body); wireless charging (Qi); IP65/​IP68-certified, fanless
peso
198 g, Suprimento de energia: 71 g
Preço
799 Euro

 

Sony Xperia XZ2
Sony Xperia XZ2
Sony Xperia XZ2
Sony Xperia XZ2
Sony Xperia XZ2
Sony Xperia XZ2
Sony Xperia XZ2
sidebar_1-multi

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
939 MBit/s ∼100% +40%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
669 MBit/s ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
652 MBit/s ∼69% -3%
Sony Xperia XZ1
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
489 MBit/s ∼52% -27%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
338 MBit/s ∼36% -49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (of 195, min: 46, max: 939)
201 MBit/s ∼21% -70%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XZ2
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
633 MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
519 MBit/s ∼82% -18%
Sony Xperia XZ1
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
500 MBit/s ∼79% -21%
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
456 MBit/s ∼72% -28%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
225 MBit/s ∼36% -64%
Average of class Smartphone
  (of 195, min: 51.2, max: 703)
193 MBit/s ∼30% -70%
GPS Sony Xperia XZ2 - overview
GPS Sony Xperia XZ2 - overview
GPS Sony Xperia XZ2 - lake
GPS Sony Xperia XZ2 - lake
GPS Sony Xperia XZ2 - loop
GPS Sony Xperia XZ2 - loop
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - lake
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - lake
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - loop
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - loop

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
646
cd/m²
630
cd/m²
635
cd/m²
646
cd/m²
630
cd/m²
618
cd/m²
632
cd/m²
626
cd/m²
629
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 646 cd/m² Médio: 632.4 cd/m² Minimum: 6.73 cd/m²
iluminação: 96 %
iluminação com acumulador: 630 cd/m²
Contraste: 1432:1 (Preto: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.5 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
Gamma: 2.17
sidebar_3-multi
Sony Xperia XZ2
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7
Sony Xperia XZ1
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Samsung Galaxy S9
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
OLED, 2160x1080, 6
Apple iPhone X
Super AMOLED, 2436x1125, 5.8
Screen
-54%
1%
-2%
11%
Brightness middle
630
620
-2%
529
-16%
629
0%
600
-5%
Brightness
632
610
-3%
527
-17%
636
1%
606
-4%
Brightness Distribution
96
93
-3%
96
0%
94
-2%
94
-2%
Black Level *
0.44
0.79
-80%
Contrast
1432
785
-45%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.5
4.2
-180%
1.4
7%
1.7
-13%
1.2
20%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.3
5.8
-35%
4
7%
3.6
16%
3
30%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.1
3.9
-86%
1.6
24%
2.4
-14%
1.6
24%
Gamma
2.17 111%
2.02 119%
2.16 111%
2.15 112%
2.23 108%
CCT
6513 100%
7086 92%
6358 102%
6337 103%
6707 97%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2315 Hz ≤ 28 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2315 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 28 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2315 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10377 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 30.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
225663 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ1
167748 Points ∼74% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S9
217950 Points ∼97% -3%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
177341 Points ∼79% -21%
Apple iPhone X
197851 Points ∼88% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 3, min: 162183, max: 225663)
204357 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (of 292, min: 39089, max: 225663)
70573 Points ∼31% -69%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
8069 Points ∼99%
Sony Xperia XZ1
6443 Points ∼79% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S9
5291 Points ∼65% -34%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6932 Points ∼85% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 4, min: 8069, max: 8358)
8145 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (of 155, min: 2152, max: 8078)
4526 Points ∼56% -44%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
9319 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ1
7056 Points ∼75% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S9
5736 Points ∼61% -38%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8439 Points ∼90% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 3, min: 9179, max: 9579)
9359 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (of 320, min: 1908, max: 9579)
4645 Points ∼50% -50%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
1346 Points ∼80%
Sony Xperia XZ1
1181 Points ∼70% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S9
1099 Points ∼65% -18%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1234 Points ∼73% -8%
Apple iPhone X
1682 Points ∼100% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 3, min: 1234, max: 1390)
1323 Points ∼79% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (of 395, min: 9, max: 1682)
675 Points ∼40% -50%
Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
7868 Points ∼85%
Sony Xperia XZ1
5923 Points ∼64% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S9
6373 Points ∼69% -19%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3657 Points ∼40% -54%
Apple iPhone X
9248 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 3, min: 7868, max: 7957)
7914 Points ∼86% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (of 395, min: 18, max: 9248)
1506 Points ∼16% -81%
Memory (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
2193 Points ∼53%
Sony Xperia XZ1
1752 Points ∼42% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S9
2669 Points ∼64% +22%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4142 Points ∼100% +89%
Apple iPhone X
1219 Points ∼29% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 3, min: 2193, max: 3012)
2583 Points ∼62% +18%
Average of class Smartphone (of 395, min: 21, max: 4423)
1100 Points ∼27% -50%
System (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
8402 Points ∼82%
Sony Xperia XZ1
5840 Points ∼57% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S9
6234 Points ∼61% -26%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
5244 Points ∼51% -38%
Apple iPhone X
10281 Points ∼100% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 3, min: 5792, max: 8435)
7543 Points ∼73% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (of 395, min: 369, max: 10281)
2176 Points ∼21% -74%
Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
3738 Points ∼99%
Sony Xperia XZ1
2909 Points ∼77% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3285 Points ∼87% -12%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3147 Points ∼84% -16%
Apple iPhone X
3737 Points ∼99% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 3, min: 3614, max: 3925)
3759 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (of 398, min: 1, max: 3925)
1120 Points ∼30% -70%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
14362 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ1
7979 Points ∼56% -44%
Samsung Galaxy S9
6219 Points ∼43% -57%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8572 Points ∼60% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 2, min: 14073, max: 14362)
14218 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (of 97, min: 912, max: 14362)
4107 Points ∼29% -71%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
8510 Points ∼83%
Sony Xperia XZ1
6493 Points ∼63% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S9
8786 Points ∼86% +3%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6792 Points ∼66% -20%
Apple iPhone X
10255 Points ∼100% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 4, min: 8437, max: 8937)
8594 Points ∼84% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (of 139, min: 883, max: 10558)
4178 Points ∼41% -51%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
2464 Points ∼58%
Sony Xperia XZ1
1856 Points ∼44% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3688 Points ∼86% +50%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1898 Points ∼45% -23%
Apple iPhone X
4265 Points ∼100% +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 4, min: 2442, max: 2464)
2454 Points ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (of 140, min: 390, max: 4265)
1269 Points ∼30% -48%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
3630 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ1
2928 Points ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S9
2486 Points ∼68% -32%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2871 Points ∼79% -21%
Apple iPhone X
2361 Points ∼65% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 3, min: 2606, max: 3669)
3302 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (of 247, min: 1469, max: 3669)
1541 Points ∼42% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
5122 Points ∼99%
Sony Xperia XZ1
3961 Points ∼77% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3553 Points ∼69% -31%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2844 Points ∼55% -44%
Apple iPhone X
3463 Points ∼67% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 3, min: 5122, max: 5181)
5154 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (of 247, min: 53, max: 5181)
1084 Points ∼21% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
4693 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ1
3673 Points ∼78% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3244 Points ∼69% -31%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2850 Points ∼61% -39%
Apple iPhone X
3138 Points ∼67% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 3, min: 4248, max: 4732)
4558 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (of 255, min: 68, max: 4732)
1031 Points ∼22% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
3642 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ1
2564 Points ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S9
2600 Points ∼71% -29%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2896 Points ∼80% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 3, min: 2159, max: 3642)
2961 Points ∼81% -19%
Average of class Smartphone (of 276, min: 1456, max: 3642)
1429 Points ∼39% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
8122 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ1
6057 Points ∼75% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S9
4569 Points ∼56% -44%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3353 Points ∼41% -59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 3, min: 6630, max: 8122)
7623 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (of 276, min: 55, max: 8122)
1440 Points ∼18% -82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
6378 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ1
4649 Points ∼73% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3911 Points ∼61% -39%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3239 Points ∼51% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 3, min: 4540, max: 6378)
5624 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (of 284, min: 71, max: 6378)
1227 Points ∼19% -81%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
35856 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ1
23046 Points ∼64% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S9
26851 Points ∼75% -25%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22629 Points ∼63% -37%
Apple iPhone X
25633 Points ∼71% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 3, min: 30245, max: 36494)
34198 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (of 430, min: 7733, max: 36494)
12015 Points ∼34% -66%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
80233 Points ∼71%
Sony Xperia XZ1
47857 Points ∼43% -40%
Samsung Galaxy S9
48433 Points ∼43% -40%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
34008 Points ∼30% -58%
Apple iPhone X
112489 Points ∼100% +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 3, min: 76078, max: 80233)
78660 Points ∼70% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (of 430, min: 10997, max: 113380)
15316 Points ∼14% -81%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
62926 Points ∼98%
Sony Xperia XZ1
31618 Points ∼49% -50%
Samsung Galaxy S9
41093 Points ∼64% -35%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
30590 Points ∼48% -51%
Apple iPhone X
64169 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 3, min: 56913, max: 63084)
60974 Points ∼95% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (of 431, min: 10054, max: 64405)
13229 Points ∼21% -79%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
150 fps ∼85%
Sony Xperia XZ1
111 fps ∼63% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S9
144 fps ∼81% -4%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
112 fps ∼63% -25%
Apple iPhone X
177.4 fps ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 4, min: 149, max: 151)
150 fps ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (of 456, min: 5.1, max: 177)
26.9 fps ∼15% -82%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
60 fps ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ1
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone X
59.4 fps ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 3, min: 60, max: 60)
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (of 459, min: 9.7, max: 120)
23.3 fps ∼39% -61%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
82 fps ∼93%
Sony Xperia XZ1
56 fps ∼63% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S9
73 fps ∼83% -11%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
54 fps ∼61% -34%
Apple iPhone X
88.2 fps ∼100% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 3, min: 74, max: 82)
77 fps ∼87% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (of 381, min: 1.6, max: 88.2)
14.4 fps ∼16% -82%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
59 fps ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ1
52 fps ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S9
45 fps ∼76% -24%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
56 fps ∼95% -5%
Apple iPhone X
58.5 fps ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 3, min: 59, max: 59)
59 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (of 383, min: 4.4, max: 115)
14.4 fps ∼24% -76%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
60 fps ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ1
41 fps ∼68% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S9
46 fps ∼76% -23%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
37 fps ∼61% -38%
Apple iPhone X
48.9 fps ∼81% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 4, min: 60, max: 60.9)
60.2 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (of 247, min: 1.2, max: 60)
12.9 fps ∼21% -78%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
55 fps ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ1
42 fps ∼76% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S9
24 fps ∼44% -56%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
38 fps ∼69% -31%
Apple iPhone X
44.1 fps ∼80% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 3, min: 55, max: 55)
55 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (of 249, min: 6, max: 110)
12.7 fps ∼23% -77%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
35 fps ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ1
24 fps ∼69% -31%
Samsung Galaxy S9
28 fps ∼80% -20%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
21 fps ∼60% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 3, min: 35, max: 35)
35 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (of 179, min: 4, max: 35)
8.95 fps ∼26% -74%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
33 fps ∼99%
Sony Xperia XZ1
25 fps ∼75% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S9
14 fps ∼42% -58%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22 fps ∼66% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 3, min: 33, max: 34)
33.3 fps ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (of 182, min: 4.1, max: 50)
8 fps ∼24% -76%
AnTuTu v7
MEM (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
9670 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S9
8294 Points ∼61% -14%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
13626 Points ∼100% +41%
Apple iPhone X
11107 Points ∼82% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 4, min: 7910, max: 12310)
9844 Points ∼72% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (of 66, min: 4829, max: 16148)
7185 Points ∼53% -26%
UX (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
56292 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S9
55698 Points ∼98% -1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
44584 Points ∼78% -21%
Apple iPhone X
50699 Points ∼89% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 4, min: 55456, max: 58498)
57116 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (of 66, min: 19208, max: 58218)
28932 Points ∼51% -49%
GPU (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
106371 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S9
91292 Points ∼85% -14%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
81761 Points ∼76% -23%
Apple iPhone X
94618 Points ∼88% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 4, min: 106371, max: 107334)
107027 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (of 66, min: 14363, max: 107334)
35777 Points ∼33% -66%
CPU (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
94648 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S9
88577 Points ∼89% -6%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
72307 Points ∼72% -24%
Apple iPhone X
99873 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 4, min: 88739, max: 94648)
92279 Points ∼92% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (of 66, min: 33693, max: 99873)
46221 Points ∼46% -51%
Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2
266981 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S9
243861 Points ∼91% -9%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
212278 Points ∼80% -20%
Apple iPhone X
256297 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 4, min: 265569, max: 266981)
266266 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (of 66, min: 73697, max: 266981)
118267 Points ∼44% -56%

Legend

 
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei Mate 10 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone X Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.1)
224 Points ∼100% +150%
Average of class Smartphone (of 311, min: 10, max: 26077)
118 Points ∼53% +32%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
89.54 Points ∼40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 4, min: 69.8, max: 89.5)
83.4 Points ∼37% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
67.721 Points ∼30% -24%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
61.335 Points ∼27% -31%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
56.63 Points ∼25% -37%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2)
35255 Points ∼100% +110%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
16774 Points ∼48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 5, min: 14491, max: 17131)
16127 Points ∼46% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
15233 Points ∼43% -9%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
10406 Points ∼30% -38%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
10096 Points ∼29% -40%
Average of class Smartphone (of 448, min: 1506, max: 35255)
4993 Points ∼14% -70%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (of 467, min: 718, max: 59466)
11891 ms * ∼100% -397%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
3590.6 ms * ∼30% -50%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
3267.9 ms * ∼27% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 5, min: 2394, max: 2868)
2503 ms * ∼21% -5%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
2394.3 ms * ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
2077.8 ms * ∼17% +13%
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2)
718 ms * ∼6% +70%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone X (Safari Mobile 11.0)
354 Points ∼100% +35%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
262 Points ∼74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (of 4, min: 228, max: 291)
256 Points ∼72% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
170 Points ∼48% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S9 (Samsung Browser 7.0)
163 Points ∼46% -38%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
158 Points ∼45% -40%
Average of class Smartphone (of 222, min: 27, max: 362)
95.5 Points ∼27% -64%

* ... smaller is better

Sony Xperia XZ2Sony Xperia XZ1Samsung Galaxy S9Huawei Mate 10 ProApple iPhone XAverage 64 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
24%
50%
217%
45%
-21%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
30.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
47.71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
58%
67.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
123%
47.5 (of 17, min: 17.1, max: 67.2)
58%
41.7 (of 226, min: 8.29, max: 87.1)
38%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
34.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
65.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
91%
79.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
131%
64 (of 17, min: 18, max: 80.6)
87%
60 (of 226, min: 13.5, max: 96.5)
75%
Random Write 4KB
17
14.93
-12%
23.07
36%
164.45
867%
38.5 (of 22, min: 8.77, max: 152)
126%
12.8 (of 500, min: 0.14, max: 164)
-25%
Random Read 4KB
149.4
156.61
5%
131
-12%
132.27
-11%
137 (of 22, min: 78.2, max: 173)
-8%
33 (of 500, min: 1.59, max: 173)
-78%
Sequential Write 256KB
198.7
204.43
3%
206.94
4%
208.72
5%
194 (of 22, min: 133, max: 214)
-2%
67.2 (of 500, min: 2.99, max: 215)
-66%
Sequential Read 256KB
679.2
679.13
0%
815.43
20%
732.46
8%
725 (of 22, min: 529, max: 819)
7%
203 (of 500, min: 12.1, max: 832)
-70%
Shadow Fight 3
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high60 fps
 minimal60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Arena of Valor
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 min60 fps
 high HD60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Battle Bay
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 half resolution60 fps
 full resolution60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Carga Máxima
 39.7 °C39.1 °C36.3 °C 
 39.3 °C38.6 °C38.2 °C 
 36.3 °C37.3 °C38 °C 
Máximo: 39.7 °C
Médio: 38.1 °C
33.3 °C35.3 °C37.4 °C
32.9 °C34.8 °C37.3 °C
32.9 °C33.9 °C35.7 °C
Máximo: 37.4 °C
Médio: 34.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  27.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.2422532.937.23137.232.14031.738.65039.640.36328.332.98027.328.710026.932.812526.730.41602433.320020.939.425020.947.231519.554.740018.559.150017.565.863017.569.980015.773.3100015.876.7125016.674.4160015.873.5200015.476.7250015.577.131501674.7400015.868.350001666.6630016.369.6800016.374.31000016.2711250016.4621600016.452.5SPL28.685.6N1.162.7median 16.4Sony Xperia XZ2median 68.3Delta2.111.535.234.832.932.637.230.531.73139.635.128.329.927.32826.922.626.723.32426.120.934.120.940.719.550.518.557.217.56417.565.115.768.215.869.416.668.215.867.915.473.715.572.71670.615.8651666.616.364.116.364.716.263.616.460.916.455.228.680.91.146.3median 16.4Sony Xperia XZ1median 64.12.110.9hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Sony Xperia XZ2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Sony Xperia XZ1 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.04 / 0.16 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.72 / 2.21 / 2.22 Watt
Carga midlight 4.6 / 9.34 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Sony Xperia XZ2
3180 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ1
2700 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9
3000 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone X
2716 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-6%
35%
19%
-1%
5%
17%
Idle Minimum *
0.72
0.51
29%
0.65
10%
0.85
-18%
1.03
-43%
0.63 (of 3, min: 0.42, max: 0.75)
12%
0.83 (of 541, min: 0.8, max: 3.4)
-15%
Idle Average *
2.21
2.16
2%
0.81
63%
1.15
48%
2.4
-9%
2 (of 3, min: 1.54, max: 2.25)
10%
1.641 (of 541, min: 1.6, max: 6.2)
26%
Idle Maximum *
2.22
2.23
-0%
0.92
59%
1.23
45%
2.6
-17%
2.02 (of 3, min: 1.57, max: 2.26)
9%
1.87 (of 541, min: 2, max: 6.6)
16%
Load Average *
4.6
7.45
-62%
4.76
-3%
4.12
10%
2.96
36%
4.81 (of 3, min: 4.6, max: 4.94)
-5%
3.82 (of 541, min: 3.7, max: 10.8)
17%
Load Maximum *
9.34
9.28
1%
5.16
45%
8.42
10%
6.6
29%
9.32 (of 3, min: 9.03, max: 9.6)
-0%
5.37 (of 541, min: 5.7, max: 14.2)
43%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
23h 22min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 19min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 02min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 39min
Sony Xperia XZ2
3180 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ1
2700 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9
3000 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone X
2716 mAh
Battery Runtime
-2%
-15%
56%
-6%
Reader / Idle
1402
1612
15%
1182
-16%
1744
24%
1292
-8%
H.264
722
580
-20%
609
-16%
929
29%
634
-12%
WiFi v1.3
679
601
-11%
474
-30%
818
20%
564
-17%
Load
159
172
8%
164
3%
398
150%
180
13%

Pro

+ Smartphone muito veloz
+ É possível alcançar 60-fps no jogos
+ Tela brilhante com cores vibrantes
+ câmera principal com vários recursos ...
+ ...e uma qualidade de imagem realmente boa
+ É possível digitalizar em 3D
+ Carcaça protegida de acordo com o IP68
+ Toque de entrada muito exato
+ LTE veloz com muitas bandas
+ GPS exato
+ Bom hardware
+ Software extenso e de alta qualidade

Contra

- Alguns aplicativos bloatware
- Propenso às digitais
- Sensor de digitais não pode ser sentido facilmente
- O fone de ouvido de distorce com vozes altas
- Qualidade moderada do alto-falante
- Acesso relativamente lento ao micro-SD
- consumo alto de energia situacionalmente
- Marcos relativamente largos
- Sem conector de 3,5 mm
- Afogamento sob uso intenso
The Sony Xperia XZ2 in review, courtesy of Sony Germany.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 in review, courtesy of Sony Germany.

Oh, Sony ... queremos elogiar seus smartphones só porque eles são ousados e você sabe como apresentá-los bem. Mas lembramos que você ignorou a tendência dos smartphones sem bordas e que agora está lançando um novo telefone que ignora completamente as tradições de design de sua marca. Além disso, você está sempre um pouco atrasado com a memória instalada em seus telefones. O motivo da queda contínua da qualidade das chamadas e da qualidade do som do fone de ouvido desde operia Z3 é desconhecido para todos, menos para você mesma.

Não podemos elogiar o Xperia XZ2 sem reservas, apesar de ainda ser um bom smartphone: As câmeras com suporte HDR para vídeos e a opção de digitalizar objetos em 3D,brilham, e não apenas no papel. Mesmo que a resolução da câmera frontal seja significativamente menor do que a do telefone anterior, ela ainda tira boas fotos. O desempenho do smartphone é excelente, permitindo jogos a 60 fps e as emissões também são aceitáveis. Os tempos de duração da bateria são bons, mas poderiam ser melhorados com menor consumo de energia.

O Sony Xperia XZ2 um smartphone de alta qualidade. Seu desempenho e suas excelentes câmeras são fortes motivos para uma compra.

Apesar de alguns impedimentos, o smartphone da Sony ainda oferece boas razões para uma recomendação de compra. O excelente hardware e desempenho rápido são apenas duas dessas razões.

Sony Xperia XZ2 - 04/23/2018 v6
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
92%
Teclado
69 / 75 → 91%
Mouse
95%
Conectividade
48 / 60 → 81%
Peso
88%
Bateria
94%
Pantalha
91%
Desempenho do jogos
70 / 63 → 100%
Desempenho da aplicação
72 / 70 → 100%
Temperatura
88%
Ruído
100%
Audio
61 / 91 → 67%
Camera
87%
Médio
81%
89%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia XZ2
Florian Wimmer, 2018-05- 3 (Update: 2018-05- 6)