Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi Note 10 – Rei das câmeras barato
Comparison devices
Rating | ratingversion | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83.3 % | 7 | 12/2019 | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 SD 730G, Adreno 618 | 208 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.47" | 2340x1080 | |
| 89.4 % | 6 | 08/2019 | Honor 20 Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10 | 174 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.26" | 2340x1080 | |
| 86 % | 7 | 07/2019 | Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL SD 855, Adreno 640 | 190 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.40" | 2340x1080 | |
| 80.6 % | 7 | 05/2019 | Google Pixel 3a XL SD 670, Adreno 616 | 167 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.00" | 2160x1080 | |
| 84.2 % | 6 | 03/2019 | Sony Xperia 10 Plus SD 636, Adreno 509 | 180 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 2520x1080 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Google Pixel 3a XL | |
| Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL | |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 | |
| Honor 20 | |
| Sony Xperia 10 Plus | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Google Pixel 3a XL | |
| Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 | |
| Sony Xperia 10 Plus | |
| Honor 20 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 625 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.38 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
137.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.251
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47 | Honor 20 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.26 | Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL IPS, 2340x1080, 6.40 | Google Pixel 3a XL OLED, 2160x1080, 6.00 | Sony Xperia 10 Plus IPS, 2520x1080, 6.50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 29% | -4% | 23% | -30% | |
| Brightness middle | 625 | 481 -23% | 569 -9% | 409 -35% | 572 -8% |
| Brightness | 607 | 481 -21% | 537 -12% | 410 -32% | 580 -4% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 95 7% | 79 -11% | 96 8% | 96 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.55 | 0.31 | 0.4 | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.38 | 1.1 75% | 3.5 20% | 1.3 70% | 4.5 -3% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.83 | 2.1 69% | 6 12% | 2.3 66% | 12.2 -79% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.1 | 1.3 68% | 5.1 -24% | 1.5 63% | 7.9 -93% |
| Gamma | 2.251 98% | 2.12 104% | 2.36 93% | 2.22 99% | 2.16 102% |
| CCT | 7251 90% | 6442 101% | 6827 95% | 6621 98% | 8726 74% |
| Contrast | 875 | 1835 | 1430 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 215.5 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 215.5 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 215.5 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75) | |
| Honor 20 (Chrome 75) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (45.8 - 50.6, n=6) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78) | |
| Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73) | |
| Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Honor 20 (Chrome 75) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (79.2 - 87.7, n=6) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78) | |
| Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75) | |
| Honor 20 (Chrome 75) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (40.4 - 44.2, n=6) | |
| Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73) | |
| Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75) | |
| Honor 20 (Chrome 75) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (66 - 77, n=6) | |
| Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73) | |
| Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=212, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75) | |
| Honor 20 (Chrome 75) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (16197 - 17768, n=6) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78) | |
| Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73) | |
| Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73) | |
| Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73) | |
| Honor 20 (Chrome 75) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2770 - 3054, n=6) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78) | |
| Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 | Honor 20 | Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL | Google Pixel 3a XL | Sony Xperia 10 Plus | Average 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 34% | 33% | -25% | -43% | 1% | 208% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 480.5 | 829 73% | 831 73% | 315.6 -34% | 280.3 -42% | 530 ? 10% | 1502 ? 213% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 243.6 | 196.4 -19% | 195.6 -20% | 179.1 -26% | 205.2 -16% | 215 ? -12% | 1111 ? 356% |
| Random Read 4KB | 106.2 | 156.7 48% | 153.3 44% | 92.1 -13% | 77.7 -27% | 129.6 ? 22% | 247 ? 133% |
| Random Write 4KB | 118.9 | 157 32% | 160.2 35% | 87 -27% | 16.77 -86% | 100.7 ? -15% | 271 ? 128% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 87 ? | 83.9 ? | 68.3 ? | ||||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 62.5 ? | 58.4 ? | 53.2 ? |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 69.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 69.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 69.6% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (119.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Honor 20 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0 / 0.2 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.7 / 1.8 / 2.2 Watt |
| Carga |
5.2 / 7.5 Watt |
    
| |
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 5260 mAh | Honor 20 3750 mAh | Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL 5000 mAh | Google Pixel 3a XL 3700 mAh | Sony Xperia 10 Plus 3000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -8% | -14% | 24% | 5% | -1% | -0% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.7 | 0.88 -26% | 0.81 -16% | 0.7 -0% | 0.68 3% | 0.84 ? -20% | 0.897 ? -28% |
| Idle Average * | 1.8 | 2.27 -26% | 2.35 -31% | 1.63 9% | 2.12 -18% | 1.953 ? -9% | 1.452 ? 19% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.2 | 2.34 -6% | 2.37 -8% | 1.67 24% | 2.17 1% | 2.26 ? -3% | 1.629 ? 26% |
| Load Average * | 5.2 | 4.81 7% | 5.33 -3% | 2.64 49% | 3.82 27% | 4.51 ? 13% | 5.55 ? -7% |
| Load Maximum * | 7.5 | 6.63 12% | 8.55 -14% | 4.62 38% | 6.44 14% | 6.63 ? 12% | 8.31 ? -11% |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Mi Note 10 5260 mAh | Honor 20 3750 mAh | Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL 5000 mAh | Google Pixel 3a XL 3700 mAh | Sony Xperia 10 Plus 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -47% | 7% | -28% | -47% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2134 | 1262 -41% | 2114 -1% | 1822 -15% | 1400 -34% |
| H.264 | 1423 | 606 -57% | 2138 50% | 960 -33% | 701 -51% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 1127 | 654 -42% | 801 -29% | 709 -37% | 635 -44% |
| Load | 387 | 208 -46% | 409 6% | 289 -25% | 154 -60% |
Pro
Contra
O Xiaomi Mi Note 10 é bastante impressionante em algumas áreas: Por pouco menos de 500 Euros (~US$ 557), você obtém uma câmera excelente e muito flexível de smartphone, que pode ganhar pontos com nitidez muito alta, excelente reprodução de detalhes e boas cores. A tela AMOLED brilhante também é agradável; existe uma configuração de armazenamento adequada e, se você tiver um fone de ouvido padrão em casa, o seu dinheiro também terá valido a pena graças ao conector de áudio de 3,5 mm.
Com os módulos de comunicação, você começa a perceber que não está na liga superior absoluta: A velocidade máxima do LTE é boa, mas significativamente mais lenta que nos dispositivos atuais de gama alta. Quando se trata de Wi-Fi, o Xiaomi Mi Note 10 também não consegue acompanhar, e um leitor microSD também está faltando.
Mas, acima de tudo, o desempenho mais baixo deve ser um critério para quem usa aplicativos muito exigentes: O Mi Note 10 é simplesmente uma classe mais lenta aqui. Por que a Xiaomi optou por um SoC mais lento, quando, por exemplo, o Asus Zenfone 6 mostra que você também pode oferecer a série Snapdragon 855 por esse preço também? Provavelmente porque o 730G é mais adequado para a configuração da câmera.
Uma ótima câmera e uma tela AMOLED muito brilhante por pouco dinheiro: Se você conseguir viver com um desempenho um pouco mais baixo, o Xiaomi Mi Note 10 é sua primeira escolha.
Se você incluir o preço do Xiaomi Mi Note 10, não há uma oferta melhor no momento se estiver procurando por uma das melhores câmeras e bateria com duração muito longa.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
-
09/03/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt