Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi Note 10 – Rei das câmeras barato

Sobrecarga de megapixels. Bateria enorme, grande número de megapixels na câmera, enorme potência no carregador. Com o Xiaomi Mi Note 10, existem vários superlativos, mas você deve dar um pequeno passo para trás quando se trata do desempenho do processador. Nossa análise revela se a compra vale a pena.
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto),
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Mi Note Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 470 Gold / Silver
Placa gráfica
Memória
6144 MB 
Pantalha
6.47 polegadas 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 398 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass 5, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 60 Hz
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 117 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.7 x 157.8 x 74.2
Bateria
5260 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix f/​1.69, OIS, quad-LED flash, videos @2160p/​30fps (camera 1); 20.0MP, f/​2.2, wide-angle lens (camera 2); 12.0MP, f/​2.0, telephoto lens (camera 3); 5.0MP, f/​2.0, telephoto lens, OIS (camera 4); 2.0MP, macro lens (camera 5)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/​2.0, videos @1080p/​30fps
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono na borda inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador rápido, cabo USB, SIM tool, capa de silicone, 12 Meses Garantia, SAR value: 1.107W/​kg (head), 1.392W/​kg (body); LTE: Cat 15 800 Mb/s (download), Cat 13 150 Mb/s (upload), fanless
peso
208 g, Suprimento de energia: 114 g
Preço
499 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison devices

Rating
ratingversion
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
83 %7
12/2019
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
SD 730G, Adreno 618
208 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.47"2340x1080
89 %6
08/2019
Honor 20
Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10
174 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.26"2340x1080
86 %7
07/2019
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
SD 855, Adreno 640
190 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.4"2340x1080
82 %7
05/2019
Google Pixel 3a XL
SD 670, Adreno 616
167 g64 GB eMMC Flash6"2160x1080
84 %6
03/2019
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
SD 636, Adreno 509
180 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.5"2520x1080
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Xiaomi Mi Note 10

Size comparison

167 mm 73 mm 8.3 mm 180 g159.1 mm 75.44 mm 9.2 mm 190 g160.1 mm 76.1 mm 8.2 mm 167 g157.8 mm 74.2 mm 9.7 mm 208 g154.25 mm 73.97 mm 7.87 mm 174 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 3a XL
Adreno 616, SD 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash
668 (min: 617, max: 692) MBit/s ∼100% +102%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
447 (min: 201, max: 659) MBit/s ∼67% +35%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
331 (min: 317, max: 341) MBit/s ∼50%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
317 (min: 163, max: 343) MBit/s ∼47% -4%
Honor 20
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
302 (min: 80, max: 331) MBit/s ∼45% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=562)
267 MBit/s ∼40% -19%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 3a XL
Adreno 616, SD 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash
580 (min: 548, max: 602) MBit/s ∼100% +77%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
523 (min: 410, max: 563) MBit/s ∼90% +60%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
327 (min: 321, max: 333) MBit/s ∼56%
Honor 20
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
294 (min: 235, max: 335) MBit/s ∼51% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=562)
253 MBit/s ∼44% -23%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
153 (min: 133, max: 180) MBit/s ∼26% -53%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø331 (317-341)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø327 (321-333)
Garmin Edge 520 GPS – Overview
Garmin Edge 520 GPS – Overview
Garmin Edge 520 GPS – Turning point
Garmin Edge 520 GPS – Turning point
Garmin Edge 520 GPS – Bridge
Garmin Edge 520 GPS – Bridge
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 GPS – Overview
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 GPS – Overview
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 GPS – Turning point
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 GPS – Turning point
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 GPS – Bridge
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 GPS – Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Macro camera sample
Macro camera sample
Wide-angle camera sample
Main camera sample
Telephoto lens 1 sample
Telephoto lens 2 sample
ColorChecker
21.7 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
24.9 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
21.3 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
26.6 ∆E
38.4 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
28.9 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi Note 10: 19.95 ∆E min: 7.7 - max: 38.44 ∆E
ColorChecker
7.4 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
6 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
7 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi Note 10: 6.09 ∆E min: 1.54 - max: 11.16 ∆E
Test chart – perfect lighting
Test chart – perfect lighting
Test chart – 1 lux
587
cd/m²
612
cd/m²
637
cd/m²
577
cd/m²
625
cd/m²
635
cd/m²
570
cd/m²
589
cd/m²
627
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 637 cd/m² Médio: 606.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.46 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 625 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.38 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6
137.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.251
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Honor 20
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.26
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.4
Google Pixel 3a XL
OLED, 2160x1080, 6
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
IPS, 2520x1080, 6.5
Screen
29%
-4%
23%
-30%
Brightness middle
625
481
-23%
569
-9%
409
-35%
572
-8%
Brightness
607
481
-21%
537
-12%
410
-32%
580
-4%
Brightness Distribution
89
95
7%
79
-11%
96
8%
96
8%
Black Level *
0.55
0.31
0.4
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.38
1.1
75%
3.5
20%
1.3
70%
4.5
-3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.83
2.1
69%
6
12%
2.3
66%
12.2
-79%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.1
1.3
68%
5.1
-24%
1.5
63%
7.9
-93%
Gamma
2.251 98%
2.12 104%
2.36 93%
2.22 99%
2.16 102%
CCT
7251 90%
6442 101%
6827 95%
6621 98%
8726 74%
Contrast
875
1835
1430

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 215.5 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 215.5 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 215.5 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17957 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.1 ms).
Geekbench 5
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
891 Points ∼65%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
639 Points ∼47% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (891 - 930, n=2)
911 Points ∼67% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (143 - 3794, n=45)
1362 Points ∼100% +53%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1128 Points ∼65%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
737 Points ∼42% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (1123 - 1128, n=2)
1126 Points ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 4593, n=53)
1738 Points ∼100% +54%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1723 Points ∼95%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1322 Points ∼73% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (1723 - 1729, n=2)
1726 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (807 - 3575, n=65)
1821 Points ∼100% +6%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
543 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
344 Points ∼63% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (543 - 543, n=2)
543 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 1344, n=65)
519 Points ∼96% -4%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
7558 Points ∼77%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
7945 Points ∼81% +5%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9814 Points ∼100% +30%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
7377 Points ∼75% -2%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6018 Points ∼61% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (7134 - 7628, n=4)
7468 Points ∼76% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 13202, n=490)
5834 Points ∼59% -23%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
9052 Points ∼69%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
9825 Points ∼75% +9%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
13047 Points ∼100% +44%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
9397 Points ∼72% +4%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
7181 Points ∼55% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (8941 - 9240, n=4)
9095 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19711, n=648)
6373 Points ∼49% -30%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2768 Points ∼100%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2106 Points ∼76% -24%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2492 Points ∼90% -10%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2314 Points ∼84% -16%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2282 Points ∼82% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2621 - 2768, n=4)
2707 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4057, n=149)
2636 Points ∼95% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2153 Points ∼37%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2232 Points ∼39% +4%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5747 Points ∼100% +167%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1416 Points ∼25% -34%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
809 Points ∼14% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2143 - 2155, n=4)
2149 Points ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=149)
2916 Points ∼51% +35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2265 Points ∼51%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2203 Points ∼49% -3%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4454 Points ∼100% +97%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1550 Points ∼35% -32%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
944 Points ∼21% -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2244 - 2265, n=4)
2252 Points ∼51% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6644, n=149)
2626 Points ∼59% +16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3188 Points ∼100%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2540 Points ∼80% -20%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2840 Points ∼89% -11%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2532 Points ∼79% -21%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2345 Points ∼74% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3058 - 3202, n=4)
3153 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=496)
2175 Points ∼68% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2425 Points ∼34%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3062 Points ∼43% +26%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7069 Points ∼100% +192%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1612 Points ∼23% -34%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
862 Points ∼12% -64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2425 - 2492, n=4)
2454 Points ∼35% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=496)
2075 Points ∼29% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2561 Points ∼48%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2928 Points ∼55% +14%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5311 Points ∼100% +107%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1754 Points ∼33% -32%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1003 Points ∼19% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2561 - 2577, n=4)
2568 Points ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8204, n=497)
1926 Points ∼36% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3193 Points ∼68%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2598 Points ∼55% -19%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4703 Points ∼100% +47%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2495 Points ∼53% -22%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2352 Points ∼50% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3112 - 3193, n=4)
3149 Points ∼67% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=526)
2085 Points ∼44% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3646 Points ∼35%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3459 Points ∼34% -5%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10290 Points ∼100% +182%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2537 Points ∼25% -30%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1397 Points ∼14% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3646 - 3751, n=4)
3673 Points ∼36% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=526)
2762 Points ∼27% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3535 Points ∼43%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3222 Points ∼40% -9%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8141 Points ∼100% +130%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2528 Points ∼31% -28%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1536 Points ∼19% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3513 - 3594, n=4)
3541 Points ∼43% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=526)
2321 Points ∼29% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3171 Points ∼73%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3685 Points ∼85% +16%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4320 Points ∼100% +36%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2466 Points ∼57% -22%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2351 Points ∼54% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3088 - 3257, n=4)
3180 Points ∼74% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=576)
2062 Points ∼48% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2237 Points ∼35%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4184 Points ∼66% +87%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6336 Points ∼100% +183%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1487 Points ∼23% -34%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
808 Points ∼13% -64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2237 - 2298, n=4)
2256 Points ∼36% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=576)
1735 Points ∼27% -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2394 Points ∼42%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4062 Points ∼71% +70%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5705 Points ∼100% +138%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1631 Points ∼29% -32%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
946 Points ∼17% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (2388 - 2459, n=4)
2412 Points ∼42% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7323, n=577)
1658 Points ∼29% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3191 Points ∼72%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3557 Points ∼80% +11%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4454 Points ∼100% +40%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2489 Points ∼56% -22%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2349 Points ∼53% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3075 - 3294, n=4)
3197 Points ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=618)
1924 Points ∼43% -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3498 Points ∼35%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3292 Points ∼33% -6%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9973 Points ∼100% +185%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2428 Points ∼24% -31%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1327 Points ∼13% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3485 - 3610, n=4)
3524 Points ∼35% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12494, n=617)
2277 Points ∼23% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3425 Points ∼44%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3347 Points ∼43% -2%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7820 Points ∼100% +128%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2441 Points ∼31% -29%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1469 Points ∼19% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3399 - 3594, n=4)
3461 Points ∼44% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9492, n=620)
1961 Points ∼25% -43%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
22054 Points ∼65%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
22337 Points ∼66% +1%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
33697 Points ∼100% +53%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
14631 Points ∼43% -34%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (14820 - 22054, n=3)
19214 Points ∼57% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=766)
15263 Points ∼45% -31%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
51267 Points ∼99%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
43622 Points ∼84% -15%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
35596 Points ∼69% -31%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (50829 - 53194, n=3)
51763 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=764)
25897 Points ∼50% -49%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
39608 Points ∼100%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
35999 Points ∼91% -9%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
26999 Points ∼68% -32%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (33007 - 39608, n=3)
37369 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 112989, n=764)
20366 Points ∼51% -49%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
84 fps ∼50%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
69 fps ∼41% -18%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼100% +99%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
58 fps ∼35% -31%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
35 fps ∼21% -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (83 - 85, n=3)
84 fps ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=772)
43.9 fps ∼26% -48%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼100%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
56 fps ∼93% -7%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
53 fps ∼88% -12%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
30 fps ∼50% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (60 - 60, n=3)
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=781)
30.5 fps ∼51% -49%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼42%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
41 fps ∼42% 0%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
97 fps ∼100% +137%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
29 fps ∼30% -29%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps ∼16% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (41 - 42, n=3)
41.3 fps ∼43% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=677)
25.8 fps ∼27% -37%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps ∼63%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
57 fps ∼95% +50%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +58%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
28 fps ∼47% -26%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
13 fps ∼22% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (36 - 39, n=3)
37.7 fps ∼63% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=685)
21.8 fps ∼36% -43%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼43%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
25 fps ∼36% -17%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼100% +130%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
20 fps ∼29% -33%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
10 fps ∼14% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (30 - 30, n=3)
30 fps ∼43% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=540)
20.8 fps ∼30% -31%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼47%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
24 fps ∼42% -11%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
57 fps ∼100% +111%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
19 fps ∼33% -30%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
8.4 fps ∼15% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (26 - 29, n=3)
27.3 fps ∼48% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=542)
18.9 fps ∼33% -30%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps ∼42%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
21 fps ∼88% +110%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼100% +140%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
7.2 fps ∼30% -28%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
3.2 fps ∼13% -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (10 - 11, n=4)
10.3 fps ∼43% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=288)
11.2 fps ∼47% +12%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps ∼63%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
14 fps ∼88% +40%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼100% +60%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
4.5 fps ∼28% -55%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2.2 fps ∼14% -78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (6.7 - 10, n=4)
7.53 fps ∼47% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=286)
8.07 fps ∼50% -19%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼44%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
31 fps ∼86% +94%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps ∼100% +125%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼31% -31%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4.9 fps ∼14% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (16 - 17, n=4)
16.3 fps ∼45% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=292)
16.6 fps ∼46% +4%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼43%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
32 fps ∼76% +78%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼100% +133%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
12 fps ∼29% -33%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.1 fps ∼15% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (18 - 18, n=4)
18 fps ∼43% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=291)
19.3 fps ∼46% +7%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼40%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
17 fps ∼40% 0%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼100% +147%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼26% -35%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps ∼15% -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (17 - 17, n=3)
17 fps ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=465)
14 fps ∼33% -18%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼42%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
15 fps ∼42% 0%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps ∼100% +140%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼31% -27%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.1 fps ∼14% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (15 - 17, n=3)
15.7 fps ∼44% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=469)
12.5 fps ∼35% -17%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1237 Points ∼94%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
1281 Points ∼97% +4%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1321 Points ∼100% +7%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1186 Points ∼90% -4%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1046 Points ∼79% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (1190 - 1365, n=3)
1264 Points ∼96% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=709)
807 Points ∼61% -35%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3878 Points ∼41%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
6681 Points ∼71% +72%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9416 Points ∼100% +143%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2815 Points ∼30% -27%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1611 Points ∼17% -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3858 - 3878, n=3)
3867 Points ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=709)
2428 Points ∼26% -37%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
4281 Points ∼57%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5683 Points ∼76% +33%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7500 Points ∼100% +75%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
3316 Points ∼44% -23%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1236 Points ∼16% -71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3678 - 4281, n=3)
3904 Points ∼52% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=709)
1805 Points ∼24% -58%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6445 Points ∼71%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
7639 Points ∼84% +19%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9094 Points ∼100% +41%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
5507 Points ∼61% -15%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4342 Points ∼48% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (6305 - 6751, n=3)
6500 Points ∼71% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=709)
3374 Points ∼37% -48%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3392 Points ∼63%
Honor 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4390 Points ∼81% +29%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5397 Points ∼100% +59%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2794 Points ∼52% -18%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1734 Points ∼32% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (3268 - 3392, n=3)
3334 Points ∼62% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=709)
1716 Points ∼32% -49%
AnTuTu v8
UX (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
49376 Points ∼91%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
37207 Points ∼69% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (49187 - 51842, n=3)
50135 Points ∼92% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6969 - 110361, n=95)
54293 Points ∼100% +10%
MEM (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
51664 Points ∼93%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
36690 Points ∼66% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (44809 - 51664, n=3)
49348 Points ∼89% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9394 - 122714, n=94)
55473 Points ∼100% +7%
GPU (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
70647 Points ∼70%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
49142 Points ∼49% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (70647 - 71875, n=3)
71223 Points ∼71% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (29020 - 224320, n=94)
100510 Points ∼100% +42%
CPU (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
94730 Points ∼91%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
67765 Points ∼65% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (94730 - 97786, n=3)
95842 Points ∼92% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23816 - 185108, n=94)
104274 Points ∼100% +10%
Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
266417 Points ∼85%
Google Pixel 3a XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
190804 Points ∼61% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
  (260154 - 273255, n=3)
266609 Points ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=94)
315184 Points ∼100% +18%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)
59.651 Points ∼100% +30%
Honor 20 (Chrome 75)
49.159 Points ∼82% +7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
46.038 Points ∼77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (45.8 - 46.1, n=3)
46 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=171)
40.2 Points ∼67% -13%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
32.083 Points ∼54% -30%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
25.96 Points ∼44% -44%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)
112.17 Points ∼100% +42%
Honor 20 (Chrome 75)
97.57 Points ∼87% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (79.2 - 84, n=3)
81.8 Points ∼73% +3%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
79.228 Points ∼71%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
57.573 Points ∼51% -27%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=600)
46.3 Points ∼41% -42%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)
66.7 runs/min ∼100% +54%
Honor 20 (Chrome 75)
58.3 runs/min ∼87% +35%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
43.3 runs/min ∼65%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=155)
43.1 runs/min ∼65% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (40.4 - 43.6, n=3)
42.4 runs/min ∼64% -2%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
32.5 runs/min ∼49% -25%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
27.4 runs/min ∼41% -37%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)
108 Points ∼100% +40%
Honor 20 (Chrome 75)
86 Points ∼80% +12%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
77 Points ∼71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (66 - 77, n=3)
71 Points ∼66% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=236)
69.8 Points ∼65% -9%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
62 Points ∼57% -19%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
54 Points ∼50% -30%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)
24313 Points ∼100% +50%
Honor 20 (Chrome 75)
21358 Points ∼88% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (16197 - 17345, n=3)
16594 Points ∼68% +2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
16241 Points ∼67%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
11056 Points ∼45% -32%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
8163 Points ∼34% -50%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=767)
7690 Points ∼32% -53%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=793)
9892 ms * ∼100% -257%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
4739 ms * ∼48% -71%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)
3360.7 ms * ∼34% -21%
Honor 20 (Chrome 75)
3098.1 ms * ∼31% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2770 - 3054, n=3)
2922 ms * ∼30% -5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
2769.8 ms * ∼28%
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75)
2029.5 ms * ∼21% +27%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Mi Note 10Honor 20Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KLGoogle Pixel 3a XLSony Xperia 10 PlusAverage 128 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
34%
33%
-25%
-43%
-10%
-50%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
58.44 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
54 (28.6 - 70.2, n=15)
50.7 (1.7 - 87.1, n=509)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
87.04 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
69.7 (30.2 - 86, n=15)
68.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=509)
Random Write 4KB
118.9
156.98
32%
160.18
35%
86.96
-27%
16.77
-86%
76.2 (13.5 - 180, n=20)
-36%
33.1 (0.14 - 319, n=856)
-72%
Random Read 4KB
106.2
156.7
48%
153.29
44%
92.12
-13%
77.67
-27%
122 (88.4 - 173, n=20)
15%
57.1 (1.59 - 324, n=856)
-46%
Sequential Write 256KB
243.6
196.41
-19%
195.6
-20%
179.09
-26%
205.19
-16%
192 (143 - 257, n=20)
-21%
122 (2.99 - 911, n=856)
-50%
Sequential Read 256KB
480.5
829.3
73%
831.4
73%
315.6
-34%
280.34
-42%
494 (409 - 733, n=20)
3%
329 (12.1 - 1802, n=856)
-32%
010203040506070Tooltip
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.32.1.2: Ø60.4 (44-61)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.32.1.2: Ø60.5 (58-61)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.9.3a: Ø29.5 (20-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.9.3a: Ø29.5 (23-31)
; Shadow Fight 3; high; 1.20.0: Ø58.1 (48-61)
; Shadow Fight 3; minimal; 1.20.0: Ø58.4 (41-61)
Carga Máxima
 36.1 °C39.3 °C38.9 °C 
 36.7 °C38.5 °C38.6 °C 
 36.5 °C37.9 °C37.9 °C 
Máximo: 39.3 °C
Médio: 37.8 °C
36.4 °C38.5 °C35.9 °C
36.6 °C36.8 °C36.1 °C
37.3 °C36.6 °C35.6 °C
Máximo: 38.5 °C
Médio: 36.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  41.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.946.32542.343.93134.834.6403939.15040.842.66334.4358028.127.110025.125.112523.627.816022.137.120020.244.925019.650.231518.456.440018.960.550020.163.66302065.280017.566.3100016.175125015.576.2160017.874.320001673250015.971.4315016.172.3400016.363.4500016.564.8630016.572.1800016.970.91000016.663.9125001764.51600016.555SPL67.866.429.383.6N20.818.51.255.5median 17median 64.5Delta1.710.436.732.237.133.328.129.927.624.337.538.122.925.323.827.321.324.519.130.218.444.417.946.117.752.417.959.214.658.715.95915.263.716.264.91469.51570.114.76814.470.314.672.814.271.314.770.314.669.914.967.215.163.615.158.414.851.115.136.927.2810.947.9median 15.1median 63.61.411.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi Note 10Honor 20
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Honor 20 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.7 / 1.8 / 2.2 Watt
Carga midlight 5.2 / 7.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
5260 mAh
Honor 20
3750 mAh
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
5000 mAh
Google Pixel 3a XL
3700 mAh
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
3000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-8%
-14%
24%
5%
11%
5%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
0.88
-26%
0.81
-16%
0.7
-0%
0.68
3%
0.733 (0.7 - 0.8, n=3)
-5%
0.887 (0.2 - 3.4, n=866)
-27%
Idle Average *
1.8
2.27
-26%
2.35
-31%
1.63
9%
2.12
-18%
1.383 (1.1 - 1.8, n=3)
23%
1.754 (0.6 - 6.2, n=865)
3%
Idle Maximum *
2.2
2.34
-6%
2.37
-8%
1.67
24%
2.17
1%
1.787 (1.36 - 2.2, n=3)
19%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=866)
7%
Load Average *
5.2
4.81
7%
5.33
-3%
2.64
49%
3.82
27%
4.76 (3.7 - 5.38, n=3)
8%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=860)
21%
Load Maximum *
7.5
6.63
12%
8.55
-14%
4.62
38%
6.44
14%
6.77 (6.1 - 7.5, n=3)
10%
6.04 (1.2 - 14.2, n=860)
19%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
35h 34min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
18h 47min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
23h 43min
Carga (máximo brilho)
6h 27min
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
5260 mAh
Honor 20
3750 mAh
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL
5000 mAh
Google Pixel 3a XL
3700 mAh
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-47%
7%
-28%
-47%
Reader / Idle
2134
1262
-41%
2114
-1%
1822
-15%
1400
-34%
H.264
1423
606
-57%
2138
50%
960
-33%
701
-51%
WiFi v1.3
1127
654
-42%
801
-29%
709
-37%
635
-44%
Load
387
208
-46%
409
6%
289
-25%
154
-60%

Pro

+ Fotos muito nítidas da câmera
+ Zoom ótico 5x
+ Tela AMOLED brilhante
+ Conector de áudio de 3,5 mm
+ A bateria dura uma eternidade
+ Carga rápida
+ Muito pouca geração de calor
+ Tela táctil precisa
+ Ótima relação preço-desempenho

Contra

- As fotos com pouca luz têm muito pouco alcance dinâmico
- Câmera principal com borrão de aparência artificial
- Apenas 12 meses de garantia
- Sem leitor de MicroSD
- Qualidade de chamada medíocre
- Bastante pesado
In review: Xiaomi Mi Note 10. Review device provided by:
In review: Xiaomi Mi Note 10. Review device provided by:

O Xiaomi Mi Note 10 é bastante impressionante em algumas áreas: Por pouco menos de 500 Euros (~US$ 557), você obtém uma câmera excelente e muito flexível de smartphone, que pode ganhar pontos com nitidez muito alta, excelente reprodução de detalhes e boas cores. A tela AMOLED brilhante também é agradável; existe uma configuração de armazenamento adequada e, se você tiver um fone de ouvido padrão em casa, o seu dinheiro também terá valido a pena graças ao conector de áudio de 3,5 mm.

Com os módulos de comunicação, você começa a perceber que não está na liga superior absoluta: A velocidade máxima do LTE é boa, mas significativamente mais lenta que nos dispositivos atuais de gama alta. Quando se trata de Wi-Fi, o Xiaomi Mi Note 10 também não consegue acompanhar, e um leitor microSD também está faltando.

Mas, acima de tudo, o desempenho mais baixo deve ser um critério para quem usa aplicativos muito exigentes: O Mi Note 10 é simplesmente uma classe mais lenta aqui. Por que a Xiaomi optou por um SoC mais lento, quando, por exemplo, o Asus Zenfone 6 mostra que você também pode oferecer a série Snapdragon 855 por esse preço também? Provavelmente porque o 730G é mais adequado para a configuração da câmera.

Uma ótima câmera e uma tela AMOLED muito brilhante por pouco dinheiro: Se você conseguir viver com um desempenho um pouco mais baixo, o Xiaomi Mi Note 10 é sua primeira escolha.

Se você incluir o preço do Xiaomi Mi Note 10, não há uma oferta melhor no momento se estiver procurando por uma das melhores câmeras e bateria com duração muito longa.

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 - 12/20/2019 v7
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
86%
Teclado
69 / 75 → 92%
Mouse
96%
Conectividade
48 / 70 → 69%
Peso
88%
Bateria
93%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
28 / 64 → 44%
Desempenho da aplicação
68 / 86 → 79%
Temperatura
90%
Ruído
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 82%
Camera
74%
Médio
77%
83%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Mi Note 10 – Rei das câmeras barato
Florian Schmitt, 2019-12-19 (Update: 2019-12-27)