Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Subportátil Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus (Core i7)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 81 %
iluminação com acumulador: 343 cd/m²
Contraste: 1143:1 (Preto: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.73 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.29 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
83% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
82.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB LG Philips LP133WF4-SPB1 (LGD04EF), , 1920x1080, 13.30 | Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Chimei Innolux, N133HCE-GP1, , 1920x1080, 13.30 | HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA AUO226D, , 1920x1080, 12.50 | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Sharp SHP1449 LQ133M1, , 1920x1080, 13.30 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 4% | -26% | -18% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.3 | 64.6 -1% | 44.45 -32% | 48.94 -25% |
| sRGB Coverage | 82.9 | 89.1 7% | 65.2 -21% | 73.3 -12% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 60.6 | 64.8 7% | 45.96 -24% | 50.5 -17% |
| Response Times | 19% | 23% | 7% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 45 ? | 31 ? 31% | 32 ? 29% | 32.8 ? 27% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 29 ? | 27 ? 7% | 24 ? 17% | 33.2 ? -14% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||
| Screen | 3% | -9% | -7% | |
| Brightness middle | 343 | 359 5% | 289 -16% | 351.2 2% |
| Brightness | 306 | 344 12% | 298 -3% | 325 6% |
| Brightness Distribution | 81 | 92 14% | 87 7% | 89 10% |
| Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.25 17% | 0.27 10% | 0.195 35% |
| Contrast | 1143 | 1436 26% | 1070 -6% | 1801 58% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.73 | 4.57 3% | 4.82 -2% | 7.4 -56% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.05 | 9.25 -2% | 10.73 -19% | 9.08 -0% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.29 | 5.2 -58% | 3.84 -17% | 6.71 -104% |
| Gamma | 2.36 93% | 2.47 89% | 2.41 91% | 2.74 80% |
| CCT | 6437 101% | 6887 94% | 6492 100% | 7222 90% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 54 | 58 7% | 42.03 -22% | 50.48 -7% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 83 | 89 7% | 64.8 -22% | 73.31 -12% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
5% | -4% /
-8% | -6% /
-7% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 33 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | ||
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 | |
| HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3147 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4184 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG | HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2 | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -48% | -6% | -27% | |
| Read Seq | 1577 | 431.2 -73% | 1482 -6% | 1233 -22% |
| Write Seq | 1472 | 401 -73% | 1232 -16% | 733 -50% |
| Read 512 | 1165 | 283.7 -76% | 1191 2% | 1036 -11% |
| Write 512 | 1244 | 313.6 -75% | 1220 -2% | 439.9 -65% |
| Read 4k | 54.8 | 36.62 -33% | 46.96 -14% | 29.31 -47% |
| Write 4k | 121.5 | 76.1 -37% | 100.7 -17% | 116.9 -4% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 407.5 | 329.4 -19% | 464 14% | 479.2 18% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 321.4 | 325.6 1% | 292.1 -9% | 218.3 -32% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
| Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
| Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
| Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2589 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7123 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1794 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 38.6 | 22.4 | ||
| Far Cry Primal (2016) | 36 | 16 | ||
| Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 94.1 | 40 | 26.8 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.6 / 30.6 / 30.6 dB |
| Carga |
| 36.2 / 37.2 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.6 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.4 °C / 86.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.34 / 0.4 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.6 / 7.4 / 8.7 Watt |
| Carga |
43 / 42 Watt |
   
| |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Kingston RBU-SNS4180S3256GG, IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 13.30 | HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.50 | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 28% | 20% | 30% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.6 | 4.1 -14% | 4.3 -19% | 4.1 -14% |
| Idle Average * | 7.4 | 6.4 14% | 6 19% | 4.2 43% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.7 | 6.8 22% | 6.4 26% | 5.1 41% |
| Load Average * | 43 | 16 63% | 22.7 47% | 22.1 49% |
| Load Maximum * | 42 | 18.7 55% | 31.2 26% | 29.4 30% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 46 Wh | Acer Swift 7 SF713-51 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 41.58 Wh | HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA 6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 38 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 68% | 29% | 118% | |
| Reader / Idle | 468 | 792 69% | 526 12% | 1295 177% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 338 | 438 30% | 355 5% | 677 100% |
| Load | 89 | 182 104% | 152 71% | 157 76% |
| H.264 | 410 | 413 |
Pro
Contra
À diferença de seu predecessor quase perfeito, descobrimos algumas falhas menores na construção no novo IdeaPad 710S Plus da Lenovo. No entanto, somente o touchpad pobremente instalado será significante aqui. A excelente tela teria sido ainda melhor com uma superfície mate e um espaço de cores maior. Embora ter poucas interfaces sejam padrão em subportáteis, teria havido espaço para um saída de vídeo reduzida, como HDMI ou DP. A duração da bateria também não cumpre totalmente com a necessidade de mobilidade. A única desvantagem que poderia colocar em perigo uma recomendação de compra é o irritante assobio ocasional da ventoinha, embora isso não aconteça durante velocidades lentas da ventoinha, o qual seria o caso mais comum, e que isto também poderia ser um caso individual (!) relacionado apenas com o nosso modelo de teste.
A mobilidade e versatilidade são as propriedades mais importantes do, no geral, muito convincente Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus. No entanto, os compradores potenciais devem estar atentos a possíveis assobios da ventoinha.
É claro que a carcaça leve, porém, rígida e muito atraente, deve ser listada no lado dos pros. Os dispositivos de entrada devem atender as necessidades da maioria dos usuários. O TPM e o leitor de digitais satisfará os usuários que se preocupam com a segurança, e a GeForce 940MX com memória GDDR5 agradará os gamers casuais. Em contraste com o predecessor, o PWM não é utilizado, o grande SSD é muito veloz, e ninguém irá reclamar do desempenho do Wi-Fi. Em total, não queremos negar à atualização do 710S uma recomendação de compra, mas recomendamos que o escute durante o uso intenso, antes da compra. Os usuários que não desejem jogar provavelmente estarão melhor com a versão mais econômica baseada no i5-7200U.
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB
-
02/01/2017 v6(old)
Sven Kloevekorn