Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Tablet Huawei MediaPad M5 lite

Mike Wobker, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Tanja Hinum-Balaz (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 10/03/2018

Surround sound. A Huawei equipou o MediaPad M5 lite com quatro alto-falantes, certificados pela harman/kardon. Os compradores receberão um tablet de gama média com suporte para LTE. Descubra o que mais você pode esperar receber por cerca de £270 (~$350) em nossa análise.

Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (MediaPad Serie)
Processador
HiSilicon Kirin 659
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Memória
3072 MB 
Pantalha
10.1 polegadas 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 22 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD (até 256 GB), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: g-sensor, sensor de proximidade, sensor Hall sensor, bússola
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/900/1.800/1.900 MHz), 3G WCDMA (B1/B2/B5/B6/B8/B19), LTE FDD/TDD (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B40/B41), LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.7 x 243.4 x 162.2
Bateria
7500 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix auto focus
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix fixed focus
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 4 alto-falantes, harman/kardon, Teclado: onscreen, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Carregador USB, cabo USB Type-C, ferramenta SIM, EMUI 8.0, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR value (body): 1,01 W/kg, fanless
peso
475 g, Suprimento de energia: 78 g
Preço
330 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
350 MBit/s ∼100% +577%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
262 MBit/s ∼75% +407%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
241 MBit/s ∼69% +366%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
214 MBit/s ∼61% +314%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
51.7 MBit/s ∼15%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
263 MBit/s ∼100% +383%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
240 MBit/s ∼91% +340%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
237 MBit/s ∼90% +335%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
227 MBit/s ∼86% +317%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
54.5 MBit/s ∼21%
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 lite

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite test chart
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite test chart (detail)
529
cd/m²
473
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
525
cd/m²
514
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
546
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
439
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 546 cd/m² Médio: 492.2 cd/m² Minimum: 4.26 cd/m²
iluminação: 80 %
iluminação com acumulador: 514 cd/m²
Contraste: 535:1 (Preto: 0.96 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.42 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
92.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.216
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Screen
47%
-3%
38%
26%
Brightness middle
514
382
-26%
340
-34%
443
-14%
426
-17%
Brightness
492
378
-23%
320
-35%
428
-13%
399
-19%
Brightness Distribution
80
92
15%
84
5%
94
18%
91
14%
Black Level *
0.96
0.24
75%
0.19
80%
0.36
62%
0.38
60%
Contrast
535
1592
198%
1789
234%
1231
130%
1121
110%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.42
2.8
48%
15
-177%
3.3
39%
4.5
17%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.84
6
39%
22.8
-132%
7.2
27%
7.9
20%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.5
3.5
46%
4
38%
2.9
55%
5.2
20%
Gamma
2.216 99%
2.33 94%
2.09 105%
2.27 97%
2.23 99%
CCT
6780 96%
6903 94%
6940 94%
6961 93%
6875 95%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 100 Hz ≤ 20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 100 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 100 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8929 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
147305 Points ∼58% +120%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
78980 Points ∼31% +18%
Average of class Tablet (14200 - 227987, n=59)
71242 Points ∼28% +7%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
66863 Points ∼26%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (62810 - 68232, n=8)
65730 Points ∼26% -2%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
63777 Points ∼25% -5%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
62725 Points ∼25% -6%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (20856 - 566378, n=18)
167271 Points ∼30% +92%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
113687 Points ∼20% +31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (81992 - 89639, n=6)
87019 Points ∼15% 0%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
86908 Points ∼15%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
77717 Points ∼14% -11%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
5114 Points ∼50% +8%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
4827 Points ∼47% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (4615 - 4911, n=8)
4805 Points ∼47% +2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
4719 Points ∼46%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
4626 Points ∼45% -2%
Average of class Tablet (2345 - 6315, n=27)
4253 Points ∼41% -10%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3678 Points ∼36% -22%
Work performance score
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
5843 Points ∼43%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
5648 Points ∼42%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (5798 - 6252, n=8)
5212 Points ∼39%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
5040 Points ∼37%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4895 Points ∼36%
Average of class Tablet (2529 - 7053, n=69)
4489 Points ∼33%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Points ∼0%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1010 Points ∼50% +36%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
850 Points ∼42% +15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (724 - 919, n=8)
819 Points ∼40% +10%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
811 Points ∼40% +9%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
803 Points ∼39% +8%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 2034, n=99)
743 Points ∼37% 0%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
742 Points ∼36%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (98 - 28853, n=99)
2089 Points ∼7% +150%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1602 Points ∼6% +92%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
1015 Points ∼4% +21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (836 - 859, n=8)
848 Points ∼3% +1%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
836 Points ∼3%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
833 Points ∼3% 0%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
701 Points ∼2% -16%
Memory
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2654 Points ∼42% +36%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1948 Points ∼31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (1757 - 2011, n=8)
1910 Points ∼30% -2%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1513 Points ∼24% -22%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 5423, n=99)
1044 Points ∼17% -46%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
972 Points ∼15% -50%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
968 Points ∼15% -50%
System
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
3214 Points ∼20% +4%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3080 Points ∼19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (2899 - 3223, n=8)
3056 Points ∼19% -1%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2838 Points ∼17% -8%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2329 Points ∼14% -24%
Average of class Tablet (482 - 16467, n=99)
2270 Points ∼14% -26%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1957 Points ∼12% -36%
Overall
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1769 Points ∼21% +27%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (1334 - 1480, n=8)
1418 Points ∼17% +2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1389 Points ∼16%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1312 Points ∼16% -6%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
1281 Points ∼15% -8%
Average of class Tablet (150 - 8450, n=99)
1219 Points ∼14% -12%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1016 Points ∼12% -27%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
11575 Points ∼26% +268%
Average of class Tablet (862 - 43802, n=25)
7609 Points ∼17% +142%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
3235 Points ∼7% +3%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3148 Points ∼7%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3081 Points ∼7% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (2772 - 3148, n=8)
3045 Points ∼7% -3%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1562 Points ∼4% -50%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
5809 Points ∼16% +53%
Average of class Tablet (1106 - 18041, n=38)
4647 Points ∼13% +22%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
4323 Points ∼12% +14%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3805 Points ∼11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (3316 - 3805, n=8)
3608 Points ∼10% -5%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3305 Points ∼9% -13%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
2489 Points ∼7% -35%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1634 Points ∼26% +74%
Average of class Tablet (429 - 5002, n=38)
1606 Points ∼25% +71%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1541 Points ∼24% +64%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1204 Points ∼19% +28%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
940 Points ∼15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (869 - 946, n=8)
919 Points ∼14% -2%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
868 Points ∼14% -8%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2419 Points ∼57% +39%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
1991 Points ∼47% +14%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1744 Points ∼41%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (1527 - 1827, n=8)
1696 Points ∼40% -3%
Average of class Tablet (793 - 2952, n=50)
1439 Points ∼34% -17%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1363 Points ∼32% -22%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
843 Points ∼20% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1504 Points ∼28% +679%
Average of class Tablet (102 - 5384, n=50)
1163 Points ∼22% +503%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
557 Points ∼10% +189%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
413 Points ∼8% +114%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
381 Points ∼7% +97%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (140 - 338, n=8)
251 Points ∼5% +30%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
193 Points ∼4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1642 Points ∼35% +581%
Average of class Tablet (134 - 3806, n=55)
1025 Points ∼22% +325%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
602 Points ∼13% +150%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
489 Points ∼10% +103%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
464 Points ∼10% +93%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (176 - 409, n=8)
308 Points ∼7% +28%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
241 Points ∼5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2445 Points ∼58% +39%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
2031 Points ∼48% +16%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1758 Points ∼42%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (1586 - 1788, n=8)
1707 Points ∼40% -3%
Average of class Tablet (810 - 2952, n=53)
1374 Points ∼33% -22%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1347 Points ∼32% -23%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1128 Points ∼27% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1719 Points ∼21% +1636%
Average of class Tablet (42 - 7525, n=53)
1589 Points ∼19% +1505%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
884 Points ∼11% +793%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
731 Points ∼9% +638%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
598 Points ∼7% +504%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (99 - 532, n=8)
288 Points ∼3% +191%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
99 Points ∼1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1840 Points ∼29% +1372%
Average of class Tablet (53 - 4588, n=57)
1264 Points ∼20% +911%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
929 Points ∼14% +643%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
852 Points ∼13% +582%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
682 Points ∼11% +446%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (125 - 627, n=8)
347 Points ∼5% +178%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
125 Points ∼2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
15850 Points ∼18% +19%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
15117 Points ∼17% +14%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
14698 Points ∼17% +10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (11780 - 14930, n=8)
13618 Points ∼16% +2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
13310 Points ∼15%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 39393, n=138)
12922 Points ∼15% -3%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
9729 Points ∼11% -27%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
35210 Points ∼7% +208%
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 194856, n=138)
17864 Points ∼3% +56%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
13239 Points ∼2% +16%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
12771 Points ∼2% +12%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
11719 Points ∼2% +3%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
11419 Points ∼2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (9936 - 11713, n=8)
11066 Points ∼2% -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
26875 Points ∼11% +128%
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 103813, n=139)
14750 Points ∼6% +25%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
13742 Points ∼6% +17%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
13227 Points ∼6% +12%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
11791 Points ∼5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (10294 - 12278, n=8)
11543 Points ∼5% -2%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
11209 Points ∼5% -5%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
96 fps ∼1% +380%
Average of class Tablet (4.2 - 451, n=165)
29.7 fps ∼0% +49%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
23 fps ∼0% +15%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
22 fps ∼0% +10%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
20 fps ∼0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (16 - 20, n=8)
18.8 fps ∼0% -6%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
18 fps ∼0% -10%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
40 fps ∼1% +111%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
21 fps ∼1% +11%
Average of class Tablet (3.7 - 120, n=169)
20.4 fps ∼1% +7%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
20 fps ∼1% +5%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
19 fps ∼1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (16 - 20, n=8)
18.4 fps ∼1% -3%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
17 fps ∼1% -11%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
44 fps ∼1% +400%
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 220, n=103)
19.9 fps ∼0% +126%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.9 fps ∼0% +13%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
9.8 fps ∼0% +11%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
8.8 fps ∼0%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
8.5 fps ∼0% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (7.3 - 8.8, n=8)
8.31 fps ∼0% -6%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
26 fps ∼1% +202%
Average of class Tablet (2.9 - 110, n=106)
14.2 fps ∼0% +65%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.5 fps ∼0% +10%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
9.2 fps ∼0% +7%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
8.6 fps ∼0%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
8.3 fps ∼0% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (6.7 - 8.9, n=8)
8.28 fps ∼0% -4%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (2 - 173, n=53)
21 fps ∼0% +289%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
18 fps ∼0% +233%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
6.4 fps ∼0% +19%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6 fps ∼0% +11%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
5.4 fps ∼0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.9 fps ∼0% -9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (3.2 - 5.4, n=8)
4.81 fps ∼0% -11%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
15 fps ∼0% +183%
Average of class Tablet (4.3 - 95, n=53)
12.9 fps ∼0% +143%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
6 fps ∼0% +13%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
5.7 fps ∼0% +8%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
5.3 fps ∼0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (4.5 - 5.6, n=8)
5.04 fps ∼0% -5%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.7 fps ∼0% -11%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
18 fps ∼1% +463%
Average of class Tablet (7.2 - 107, n=33)
14.7 fps ∼0% +359%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
3.5 fps ∼0% +9%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3.2 fps ∼0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (2.9 - 3.2, n=8)
3.06 fps ∼0% -4%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3 fps ∼0% -6%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps ∼0% -37%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
10 fps ∼0% +233%
Average of class Tablet (4 - 47, n=33)
8.12 fps ∼0% +171%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
3.3 fps ∼0% +10%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3.1 fps ∼0% +3%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3 fps ∼0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (2.7 - 3.3, n=8)
2.96 fps ∼0% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps ∼0% -33%

Legend

 
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 HiSilicon Kirin 960s, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 Mediatek MT8176, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 Mediatek MT8173, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
8897 Points ∼100% +64%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
8570 Points ∼96% +58%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
6802 Points ∼76% +26%
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 45734, n=156)
6343 Points ∼71% +17%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67)
5412 Points ∼61%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (4191 - 5471, n=8)
4947 Points ∼56% -9%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60)
4502 Points ∼51% -17%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
137 Points ∼100% +14%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
120 Points ∼88%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
116 Points ∼85% -3%
Average of class Tablet (36 - 386, n=71)
109 Points ∼80% -9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (86 - 120, n=8)
104 Points ∼76% -13%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60)
93 Points ∼68% -22%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Tablet (10.9 - 279, n=71)
55.4 Points ∼100% +87%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
47.337 Points ∼85% +60%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
46.39 Points ∼84% +57%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
36.127 Points ∼65% +22%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67)
29.598 Points ∼53%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (23.4 - 31.3, n=8)
28.1 Points ∼51% -5%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60)
25.761 Points ∼47% -13%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (8684 - 10788, n=8)
9440 ms * ∼100% -2%
Average of class Tablet (603 - 43092, n=167)
9338 ms * ∼99% -1%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67)
9248.9 ms * ∼98%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60)
9236.5 ms * ∼98% -0%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
5947 ms * ∼63% +36%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
3975.5 ms * ∼42% +57%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
3756.1 ms * ∼40% +59%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei MediaPad M5 liteHuawei MediaPad M5 10.8Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50Lenovo Tab 4 10 PlusAmazon Fire HD 10 2017Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-2%
-38%
-16%
-30%
-32%
-61%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
72.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73.84 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
56.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-22%
61.1
-16%
30.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-59%
47.3 (3.4 - 87.1, n=113)
-35%
42 (14.6 - 73.8, n=42)
-42%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
85.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
80.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
83.9
0%
55.49 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-34%
66.4 (8.2 - 96.5, n=113)
-21%
59.9 (21.2 - 87.7, n=42)
-28%
Random Write 4KB
77.25
60.8
-21%
8.77
-89%
11.8
-85%
9.37
-88%
18.9 (0.75 - 77.3, n=151)
-76%
5.52 (0.13 - 77.9, n=192)
-93%
Random Read 4KB
73.47
54.7
-26%
13.7
-81%
37.3
-49%
27.72
-62%
36.3 (3.59 - 117, n=151)
-51%
17.5 (1.32 - 142, n=192)
-76%
Sequential Write 256KB
82.56
126.8
54%
92.38
12%
135.5
64%
147.67
79%
95 (14.8 - 189, n=151)
15%
35 (2.04 - 208, n=192)
-58%
Sequential Read 256KB
308.15
247.8
-20%
173.7
-44%
270.1
-12%
262.2
-15%
230 (25.8 - 440, n=151)
-25%
104 (6.75 - 741, n=192)
-66%
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Arena of Valor
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 min31 fps
 high HD31 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Carga Máxima
 30.3 °C35.4 °C30.8 °C 
 29.1 °C30.5 °C31.2 °C 
 29.1 °C29.5 °C30.1 °C 
Máximo: 35.4 °C
Médio: 30.7 °C
31.2 °C33.7 °C30.8 °C
30.5 °C31.2 °C30.6 °C
30.3 °C30.1 °C30.2 °C
Máximo: 33.7 °C
Médio: 31 °C
alimentação elétrica  39.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 34.8 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.3 to 51.8 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 34.4 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.3362525.634.83125.7364027.428.1503735.56323.328.68021.431.510021.734.712519.942.716017.448.72001756.725016.45931514.558.740014.26350014.160.563012.655.680012.557.610001258.3125011.863.3160011.669.6200011.469.3250011.369.9315011.470.9400011.171.6500011.270.4630011.369.5800011.269.41000011.359.81250011.359.41600011.349.5SPL65.56767.167.365.824.180.5N18.919.520.221.617.80.646.7median 11.8median 59.8Delta1.79.328.630.224.926.624.624.426.422.530.824.623.619.820.221.119.928.817.642.919.159.719.159.617.456.616.961.616.863.515.166.316.567.815.666.41561.915.565.115.367.615.771.515.569.715.572.815.467.915.8641663.815.860.816.154.716.151.617.349.727.979.9146.4median 16median 63.50.65.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei MediaPad M5 liteHuawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 36%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 36%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 2.8 / 3.3 / 3.9 Watt
Carga midlight 5.2 / 7.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
7500 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
7500 mAh
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6100 mAh
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
7000 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Power Consumption
-40%
-56%
8%
-12%
Idle Minimum *
2.8
2.01
28%
3.21
-15%
1.23
56%
1.55
45%
Idle Average *
3.3
5.4
-64%
5.97
-81%
3.92
-19%
4.17
-26%
Idle Maximum *
3.9
5.44
-39%
6.19
-59%
4.03
-3%
4.25
-9%
Load Average *
5.2
8.55
-64%
9.72
-87%
5
4%
7.13
-37%
Load Maximum *
7.2
11.53
-60%
9.97
-38%
7.09
2%
9.63
-34%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
36h 02min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14h 12min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 34min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 59min
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
7500 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
7500 mAh
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6100 mAh
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
7000 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Battery Runtime
-30%
-54%
-20%
-34%
Reader / Idle
2162
1344
-38%
735
-66%
1625
-25%
960
-56%
H.264
934
702
-25%
795
-15%
585
-37%
WiFi v1.3
852
648
-24%
387
-55%
647
-24%
542
-36%
Load
299
196
-34%
175
-41%
256
-14%
274
-8%

Pro

+ Carcaça estável
+ Bom desempenho do sistema
+ Compatível com stylus
+ USB Tipo C
+ Suporta LTE

Contra

- Tela de baixo contraste
- Câmera média
- Aplicativos não podem ser armazenados no cartão SD
In review: Huawei MediaPad M5 lite. Test unit provided by Huawei Germany
In review: Huawei MediaPad M5 lite. Test unit provided by Huawei Germany

O MediaPad M5 lite se saiu bem em nossa análise. Seu desempenho do sistema é suficiente para muitas cargas de trabalho diárias e ainda tem reservas para aplicativos mais exigentes. Os jogos modernos também podem ser jogados neste dispositivo, embora os usuários possam ter que se contentar com configurações gráficas médias.

O MediaPad M5 lite pode estar no nível do seu irmão mais velho em muitas áreas, com os principais pontos fracos sendo a tela e câmeras.

Por volta de £270 (~$350), a Huawei equipou muito bem o MediaPad M5 lite. Tem uma bateria grande, um leitor de digitais e LTE, bem como um bom leitor de cartões SD. No entanto, os usuários terão que aceitar baixa qualidade de câmera com uma resolução comparativamente baixa e opções limitadas de armazenamento, já que os aplicativos não podem ser armazenados no cartão microSD. Portanto, o armazenamento de aplicativos está limitado a 32 GB e a tela de baixo contraste pode não ser para todo mundo.

Huawei MediaPad M5 lite - 09/24/2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
85%
Teclado
71 / 80 → 89%
Mouse
88%
Conectividade
42 / 65 → 65%
Peso
84 / 40-88 → 91%
Bateria
97%
Pantalha
81%
Desempenho do jogos
19 / 68 → 27%
Desempenho da aplicação
40 / 76 → 53%
Temperatura
95%
Ruído
100%
Audio
76 / 91 → 84%
Camera
56 / 85 → 66%
Médio
72%
84%
Tablet - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Tablet Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Mike Wobker, 2018-10- 3 (Update: 2018-10-10)