Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Tablet Huawei MediaPad M5 (10,8 polegadas, LTE)

Florian Wimmer (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 04/16/2018

Luxo chinês. A Huawei costumava se contentar em ser gama baixa. No entanto, agora está entrando no setor de gama alta. O MediaPad M5 10.8 é o atual tablet de gama alta da Huawei. Aqui, o fabricante exibe sua confiança em si mesmo quando se trata do preço: Até o novo iPad é mais barato em determinadas circunstâncias. Então a questão que temos aqui é dupla: A Huawei está pedindo demais para a nova ardósia ou será que o seu novo tablet é realmete tão bom?

Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (MediaPad Serie)
Processador
HiSilicon Kirin 960s 2.1 GHz
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G71 MP8
Memória
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4
Pantalha
10.8 polegadas 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 280 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, IPS, Enhanced ClariVu, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 24 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, 1 Docking Station Port, Conexões Audio: audio output via USB Type-C, Card Reader: microSD de até 256GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de movimento, Hall Sensor
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, 4G, 3G (850/​900/​1900/​2100), 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), LTE
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.3 x 258.7 x 171.8
Bateria
28.5 Wh, 7500 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.2, auto-focus
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.2
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: four Harman Kardon speakers, Teclado: teclado virtual, adaptador de áudio, carregador USB, cabo USB, ferramenta e cartão SIM, HiCare, Game Suite, PhoneClone, 24 Meses Garantia, LTE-A Cat6 Download speed: 300 MBit/s, ​Upload speed: 50 MBit/s; SAR value: 0.271 W/kg (head), 1.04 W/kg (body), fanless
peso
498 g, Suprimento de energia: 75 g
Preço
449 Euro

 

Huawei MediaPad M5
Huawei MediaPad M5
Huawei MediaPad M5
Huawei MediaPad M5
Huawei MediaPad M5
Huawei MediaPad M5
Huawei MediaPad M5
Huawei MediaPad M5
Huawei MediaPad M5
sidebar_1-multi

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
570 MBit/s ∼100% +166%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
350 MBit/s ∼61% +64%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash
338 MBit/s ∼59% +58%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
262 MBit/s ∼46% +22%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
241 MBit/s ∼42% +13%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
214 MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
500 MBit/s ∼100% +111%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
263 MBit/s ∼53% +11%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash
258 MBit/s ∼52% +9%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
240 MBit/s ∼48% +1%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
237 MBit/s ∼47%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
227 MBit/s ∼45% -4%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – loop
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – loop
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – path
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – path
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 10 – overview
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 10 – overview
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 10 – loop
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 10 – loop
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 10 – path
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 10 – path

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Test pattern shot
Test pattern shot
Test pattern detail
Test pattern detail
ColorChecker shot. Original colors are displayed in the lower half of each square.
ColorChecker shot. Original colors are displayed in the lower half of each square.
389
cd/m²
381
cd/m²
375
cd/m²
395
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
365
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
375
cd/m²
368
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 395 cd/m² Médio: 378.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.83 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 382 cd/m²
Contraste: 1592:1 (Preto: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.8 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
Gamma: 2.33
sidebar_3-multi
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8
Apple iPad 6 2018
IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Screen
6%
-92%
-8%
-27%
-6%
Brightness middle
382
530
39%
340
-11%
443
16%
426
12%
435
14%
Brightness
378
513
36%
320
-15%
428
13%
399
6%
413
9%
Brightness Distribution
92
92
0%
84
-9%
94
2%
91
-1%
93
1%
Black Level *
0.24
0.61
-154%
0.19
21%
0.36
-50%
0.38
-58%
0.25
-4%
Contrast
1592
869
-45%
1789
12%
1231
-23%
1121
-30%
1740
9%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.8
1.2
57%
15
-436%
3.3
-18%
4.5
-61%
4.4
-57%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6
3.2
47%
22.8
-280%
7.2
-20%
7.9
-32%
7.7
-28%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.5
1
71%
4
-14%
2.9
17%
5.2
-49%
3.2
9%
Gamma
2.33 103%
2.28 105%
2.09 115%
2.27 106%
2.23 108%
2.35 102%
CCT
6903 94%
6588 99%
6940 94%
6961 93%
6875 95%
7056 92%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 19530 Hz ≤ 45 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 19530 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 45 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 19530 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10377 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 20.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s (of 2, min: 147305, max: 147597)
147451 Points ∼65% 0%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
147305 Points ∼65%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
78980 Points ∼35% -46%
Average of class Tablet (of 50, min: 14200, max: 227987)
68029 Points ∼30% -54%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
63777 Points ∼28% -57%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
62725 Points ∼28% -57%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
46814 Points ∼21% -68%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s (of 2, min: 5114, max: 6006)
5560 Points ∼54% +9%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
5114 Points ∼50%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
4827 Points ∼47% -6%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
4626 Points ∼45% -10%
Average of class Tablet (of 19, min: 2345, max: 6006)
3985 Points ∼39% -22%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
3927 Points ∼38% -23%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3678 Points ∼36% -28%
Work performance score
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s (of 2, min: 5040, max: 7053)
6047 Points ∼63% +20%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
5843 Points ∼61% +16%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
5648 Points ∼59% +12%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
5438 Points ∼57% +8%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
5040 Points ∼53%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4895 Points ∼51% -3%
Average of class Tablet (of 60, min: 1873, max: 7053)
4445 Points ∼46% -12%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Apple iPad 6 2018
1628 Points ∼96% +101%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s (of 2, min: 811, max: 1215)
1013 Points ∼60% +25%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1010 Points ∼60% +25%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
850 Points ∼50% +5%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
811 Points ∼48%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
803 Points ∼47% -1%
Average of class Tablet (of 88, min: 9, max: 1628)
721 Points ∼43% -11%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Graphics
Apple iPad 6 2018
6760 Points ∼73% +322%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s (of 2, min: 1602, max: 4143)
2873 Points ∼31% +79%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1602 Points ∼17%
Average of class Tablet (of 88, min: 98, max: 8602)
1519 Points ∼16% -5%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
1015 Points ∼11% -37%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
833 Points ∼9% -48%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
764 Points ∼8% -52%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
701 Points ∼8% -56%
Memory
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s (of 2, min: 2654, max: 3985)
3320 Points ∼75% +25%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2654 Points ∼60%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1513 Points ∼34% -43%
Apple iPad 6 2018
1334 Points ∼30% -50%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
1214 Points ∼27% -54%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
972 Points ∼22% -63%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
968 Points ∼22% -64%
Average of class Tablet (of 88, min: 56, max: 3985)
902 Points ∼20% -66%
System
Apple iPad 6 2018
6820 Points ∼66% +140%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s (of 2, min: 2838, max: 3940)
3389 Points ∼33% +19%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
3214 Points ∼31% +13%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2838 Points ∼28%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2329 Points ∼23% -18%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1957 Points ∼19% -31%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
1902 Points ∼19% -33%
Average of class Tablet (of 88, min: 482, max: 6820)
1855 Points ∼18% -35%
Overall
Apple iPad 6 2018
3163 Points ∼81% +79%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s (of 2, min: 1769, max: 2982)
2376 Points ∼61% +34%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1769 Points ∼45%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1312 Points ∼33% -26%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
1281 Points ∼33% -28%
Average of class Tablet (of 88, min: 167, max: 3282)
1039 Points ∼26% -41%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1016 Points ∼26% -43%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
362 Points ∼9% -80%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
11575 Points ∼81%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s (of 2, min: 11539, max: 11575)
11557 Points ∼80% 0%
Average of class Tablet (of 16, min: 1103, max: 11575)
3959 Points ∼28% -66%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
3235 Points ∼23% -72%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3081 Points ∼21% -73%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
2242 Points ∼16% -81%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1562 Points ∼11% -87%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s (of 2, min: 5809, max: 6509)
6159 Points ∼21% +6%
Apple iPad 6 2018
5952 Points ∼21% +2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
5809 Points ∼20%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
4323 Points ∼15% -26%
Average of class Tablet (of 25, min: 1216, max: 9358)
3728 Points ∼13% -36%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3305 Points ∼11% -43%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
2889 Points ∼10% -50%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
2489 Points ∼9% -57%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPad 6 2018
3499 Points ∼59% +114%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s (of 2, min: 1634, max: 1896)
1765 Points ∼30% +8%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1634 Points ∼28%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1541 Points ∼26% -6%
Average of class Tablet (of 25, min: 448, max: 3933)
1418 Points ∼24% -13%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1204 Points ∼20% -26%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
868 Points ∼15% -47%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
662 Points ∼11% -59%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s (of 2, min: 2419, max: 2653)
2536 Points ∼69% +5%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2419 Points ∼66%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
1991 Points ∼54% -18%
Apple iPad 6 2018
1439 Points ∼39% -41%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1363 Points ∼37% -44%
Average of class Tablet (of 42, min: 793, max: 2653)
1336 Points ∼36% -45%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
1318 Points ∼36% -46%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
843 Points ∼23% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Apple iPad 6 2018
3682 Points ∼68% +145%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s (of 2, min: 1504, max: 1778)
1641 Points ∼30% +9%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1504 Points ∼28%
Average of class Tablet (of 42, min: 102, max: 5384)
1195 Points ∼22% -21%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
557 Points ∼10% -63%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
413 Points ∼8% -73%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
381 Points ∼7% -75%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
259 Points ∼5% -83%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Apple iPad 6 2018
2735 Points ∼58% +67%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s (of 2, min: 1642, max: 1919)
1781 Points ∼38% +8%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1642 Points ∼35%
Average of class Tablet (of 47, min: 134, max: 3806)
1022 Points ∼22% -38%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
602 Points ∼13% -63%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
489 Points ∼10% -70%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
464 Points ∼10% -72%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
315 Points ∼7% -81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s (of 2, min: 2445, max: 2555)
2500 Points ∼69% +2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2445 Points ∼67%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
2031 Points ∼56% -17%
Apple iPad 6 2018
1535 Points ∼42% -37%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1347 Points ∼37% -45%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
1313 Points ∼36% -46%
Average of class Tablet (of 45, min: 810, max: 2555)
1268 Points ∼35% -48%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1128 Points ∼31% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Apple iPad 6 2018
6095 Points ∼75% +255%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s (of 2, min: 1719, max: 2501)
2110 Points ∼26% +23%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1719 Points ∼21%
Average of class Tablet (of 45, min: 42, max: 7525)
1649 Points ∼20% -4%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
884 Points ∼11% -49%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
731 Points ∼9% -57%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
598 Points ∼7% -65%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
518 Points ∼6% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Apple iPad 6 2018
3672 Points ∼58% +100%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s (of 2, min: 1840, max: 2513)
2177 Points ∼34% +18%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1840 Points ∼29%
Average of class Tablet (of 49, min: 53, max: 4588)
1261 Points ∼20% -31%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
929 Points ∼15% -50%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
852 Points ∼13% -54%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
682 Points ∼11% -63%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
599 Points ∼9% -67%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
15850 Points ∼20% +8%
Apple iPad 6 2018
15499 Points ∼20% +5%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
15117 Points ∼19% +3%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
14698 Points ∼19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s (of 1, min: 14698, max: 14698)
14698 Points ∼19% 0%
Average of class Tablet (of 127, min: 3675, max: 27021)
12577 Points ∼16% -14%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
9729 Points ∼12% -34%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
9275 Points ∼12% -37%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPad 6 2018
62626 Points ∼13% +78%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
35210 Points ∼7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s (of 1, min: 35210, max: 35210)
35210 Points ∼7% 0%
Average of class Tablet (of 127, min: 2109, max: 110971)
16233 Points ∼3% -54%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
13239 Points ∼3% -62%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
12771 Points ∼3% -64%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
11719 Points ∼2% -67%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
10102 Points ∼2% -71%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Apple iPad 6 2018
37372 Points ∼18% +39%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
26875 Points ∼13%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s (of 1, min: 26875, max: 26875)
26875 Points ∼13% 0%
Average of class Tablet (of 128, min: 2411, max: 54449)
13800 Points ∼7% -49%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
13742 Points ∼7% -49%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
13227 Points ∼6% -51%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
11209 Points ∼5% -58%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
9906 Points ∼5% -63%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad 6 2018
125 fps ∼7% +30%
Apple iPad 6 2018
118 fps ∼7% +23%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
96 fps ∼6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s (of 2, min: 78, max: 96)
87 fps ∼5% -9%
Average of class Tablet (of 154, min: 4.2, max: 225)
23.9 fps ∼1% -75%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
23 fps ∼1% -76%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
22 fps ∼1% -77%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
18 fps ∼1% -81%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
17 fps ∼1% -82%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad 6 2018
59.7 fps ∼13% +49%
Apple iPad 6 2018
59 fps ∼13% +48%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s (of 2, min: 40, max: 51)
45.5 fps ∼10% +14%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
40 fps ∼9%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
21 fps ∼5% -47%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
20 fps ∼4% -50%
Average of class Tablet (of 158, min: 3.7, max: 59.7)
18.6 fps ∼4% -53%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
17 fps ∼4% -57%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
14 fps ∼3% -65%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Apple iPad 6 2018
62.6 fps ∼11% +42%
Apple iPad 6 2018
58.9 fps ∼11% +34%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
44 fps ∼8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s (of 2, min: 39, max: 44)
41.5 fps ∼8% -6%
Average of class Tablet (of 93, min: 1.8, max: 110)
15.6 fps ∼3% -65%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.9 fps ∼2% -77%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
9.8 fps ∼2% -78%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
8.5 fps ∼2% -81%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
7.5 fps ∼1% -83%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad 6 2018
40.9 fps ∼11% +57%
Apple iPad 6 2018
40.3 fps ∼11% +55%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
26 fps ∼7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s (of 2, min: 24, max: 26)
25 fps ∼7% -4%
Average of class Tablet (of 96, min: 2.9, max: 58)
12.2 fps ∼3% -53%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.5 fps ∼3% -63%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
9.2 fps ∼3% -65%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
8.3 fps ∼2% -68%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
6.9 fps ∼2% -73%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad 6 2018
42.7 fps ∼8% +137%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s (of 2, min: 18, max: 27)
22.5 fps ∼4% +25%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
18 fps ∼3%
Average of class Tablet (of 43, min: 2, max: 83)
15.2 fps ∼3% -16%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
6.4 fps ∼1% -64%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6 fps ∼1% -67%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.9 fps ∼1% -73%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
4.8 fps ∼1% -73%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad 6 2018
27.3 fps ∼16% +82%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
15 fps ∼9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s (of 2, min: 14, max: 15)
14.5 fps ∼8% -3%
Average of class Tablet (of 43, min: 4.3, max: 54.3)
10.4 fps ∼6% -31%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
6 fps ∼3% -60%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
5.7 fps ∼3% -62%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.7 fps ∼3% -69%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
4.5 fps ∼3% -70%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
18 fps ∼5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s (of 2, min: 16, max: 18)
17 fps ∼4% -6%
Average of class Tablet (of 21, min: 2, max: 24)
7.17 fps ∼2% -60%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
3.5 fps ∼1% -81%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3 fps ∼1% -83%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
2.6 fps ∼1% -86%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps ∼1% -89%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
10 fps ∼9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s (of 2, min: 9.3, max: 10)
9.65 fps ∼8% -3%
Average of class Tablet (of 21, min: 2, max: 13)
5.08 fps ∼4% -49%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
3.3 fps ∼3% -67%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3.1 fps ∼3% -69%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
2.5 fps ∼2% -75%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps ∼2% -80%

Legend

 
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 HiSilicon Kirin 960s, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPad 6 2018 Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 32 GB NVMe
 
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 Mediatek MT8176, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 Mediatek MT8173, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3)
27967 Points ∼100% +311%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s (of 2, min: 6802, max: 11338)
9070 Points ∼32% +33%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
8897 Points ∼32% +31%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
8570 Points ∼31% +26%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
6802 Points ∼24%
Average of class Tablet (of 143, min: 1238, max: 31188)
5732 Points ∼20% -16%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60)
4502 Points ∼16% -34%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite (Chrome 58)
3167 Points ∼11% -53%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3)
200 Points ∼100% +72%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s (of 2, min: 116, max: 184)
150 Points ∼75% +29%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
137 Points ∼69% +18%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
116 Points ∼58%
Average of class Tablet (of 62, min: 36, max: 257)
97.3 Points ∼49% -16%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60)
93 Points ∼47% -20%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite (Chrome 58)
61 Points ∼31% -47%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3)
167.2 Points ∼100% +363%
Average of class Tablet (of 57, min: 12, max: 202)
50.1 Points ∼30% +39%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
47.337 Points ∼28% +31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s (of 2, min: 36.1, max: 56.8)
46.4 Points ∼28% +28%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
46.39 Points ∼28% +28%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
36.127 Points ∼22%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60)
25.761 Points ∼15% -29%
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite (Chrome 58)
20.178 Points ∼12% -44%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite (Chrome 58)
11161 ms * ∼100% -88%
Average of class Tablet (of 154, min: 969, max: 43092)
9537 ms * ∼85% -60%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60)
9236.5 ms * ∼83% -55%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
5947 ms * ∼53%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960s (of 2, min: 3734, max: 5947)
4841 ms * ∼43% +19%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
3975.5 ms * ∼36% +33%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
3756.1 ms * ∼34% +37%
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3)
1025.5 ms * ∼9% +83%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50Lenovo Tab 4 10 PlusAmazon Fire HD 10 2017Huawei MediaPad M3 LiteAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-41%
-19%
-34%
-41%
-36%
-64%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
73.84 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
56.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-23%
61.1
-17%
30.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-59%
56.8
-23%
44.2 (of 82, min: 9.34, max: 87.1)
-40%
37.9 (of 32, min: 14.6, max: 73.8)
-49%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
85.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
80.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
83.9
-1%
55.49 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-35%
78.7
-8%
63.6 (of 82, min: 15.6, max: 96.5)
-25%
57.6 (of 32, min: 34.4, max: 87.7)
-32%
Random Write 4KB
60.8
8.77
-86%
11.8
-81%
9.37
-85%
8.5
-86%
17.4 (of 120, min: 0.75, max: 74.9)
-71%
4.05 (of 183, min: 0.13, max: 65.1)
-93%
Random Read 4KB
54.7
13.7
-75%
37.3
-32%
27.72
-49%
38.8
-29%
33.1 (of 120, min: 3.59, max: 117)
-39%
15.3 (of 183, min: 1.32, max: 62.8)
-72%
Sequential Write 256KB
126.8
92.38
-27%
135.5
7%
147.67
16%
60.3
-52%
89.3 (of 120, min: 14.8, max: 168)
-30%
31.1 (of 183, min: 2.04, max: 148)
-75%
Sequential Read 256KB
247.8
173.7
-30%
270.1
9%
262.2
6%
133.5
-46%
221 (of 120, min: 25.8, max: 440)
-11%
94.5 (of 183, min: 6.75, max: 289)
-62%
Arena of Valor
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 min60 fps
 high HD60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Battle Bay
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 half resolution60 fps
 full resolution60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Shadow Fight 3
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
 minimal30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Heat distribution - front
Heat distribution - front
Heat distribution - back
Heat distribution - back
Carga Máxima
 32.8 °C33.6 °C31.1 °C 
 33.4 °C31.8 °C29.4 °C 
 32.7 °C29.6 °C27.7 °C 
Máximo: 33.6 °C
Médio: 31.3 °C
28.6 °C31.9 °C32.9 °C
28.2 °C30.2 °C30.4 °C
27.6 °C29 °C29.4 °C
Máximo: 32.9 °C
Médio: 29.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  29.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.630.22524.926.63124.624.44026.422.55030.824.66323.619.88020.221.110019.928.812517.642.916019.159.720019.159.625017.456.631516.961.640016.863.550015.166.363016.567.880015.666.410001561.9125015.565.1160015.367.6200015.771.5250015.569.7315015.572.8400015.467.9500015.86463001663.8800015.860.81000016.154.71250016.151.61600017.349.7SPL27.979.9N146.4median 16Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8median 63.5Delta0.65.432.73430.830.331.132.53435.832.432.129.23033.931.128.338.326.351.826.148.624.351.922.955.1225522.363.320.962.42060.519.363.218.959.918.562.317.962.217.862.817.669.317.864.717.761.717.659.317.666.217.861.317.856.717.759.217.862.130.875.71.537.2median 18.5Apple iPad 6 2018median 61.32.33.8hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple iPad 6 2018 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.15 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 2.01 / 5.4 / 5.44 Watt
Carga midlight 8.55 / 11.53 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
7500 mAh
Apple iPad 6 2018
 mAh
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6100 mAh
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
7000 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
6600 mAh
Power Consumption
-31%
-17%
35%
20%
27%
Idle Minimum *
2.01
2.2
-9%
3.21
-60%
1.23
39%
1.55
23%
1.45
28%
Idle Average *
5.4
7.8
-44%
5.97
-11%
3.92
27%
4.17
23%
4.44
18%
Idle Maximum *
5.44
7.9
-45%
6.19
-14%
4.03
26%
4.25
22%
4.61
15%
Load Average *
8.55
12.6
-47%
9.72
-14%
5
42%
7.13
17%
6.21
27%
Load Maximum *
11.53
12.8
-11%
9.97
14%
7.09
39%
9.63
16%
6.33
45%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
22h 24min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 48min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 42min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 16min
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
7500 mAh
Apple iPad 6 2018
 mAh
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6100 mAh
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
7000 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite
6600 mAh
Battery Runtime
2%
-32%
16%
-6%
26%
Reader / Idle
1344
735
-45%
1625
21%
960
-29%
1345
0%
H.264
702
795
13%
585
-17%
833
19%
WiFi v1.3
648
714
10%
387
-40%
647
0%
542
-16%
802
24%
Load
196
185
-6%
175
-11%
256
31%
274
40%
312
59%

Pro

+ Muito responsivo
+ Tela com cores precisas e de alta resolução
+ Boas câmeras
+ Quatro alto-falantes potentes
+ Bom software
+ Possibilidade de fazer chamadas
+ Bons dispositivos de entrada
+ Memória veloz
+ O tablet no esquenta
+ Boa duração da bateria

Contra

- Não muito espaço de armazenamento
- Afogamento sob uso intenso
- Sem conector de 3,5 mm
- Carcaça flexível
- Correções de segurança desatualizadas
- Wi-Fi e GPS lentos
- Bloatware pré instalado
In review: Huawei MediaPad M5. Review device provided courtesy of: Huawei Deutschland.
In review: Huawei MediaPad M5. Review device provided courtesy of: Huawei Deutschland.

No início de nossa análise, nos perguntamos se o tablet da Huawei realmente valeria o preço. A resposta é: Há vários destaques que fazem com que o tablet não pareça tão caro. Além disso, a relação preço/desempenho também é muito boa.

Esses destaques incluem: A tela de alta resolução com boa cobertura de espaço de cor, os alto-falantes poderosos e o ótimo desempenho. O fato de você poder fazer ligações telefônicas com o tablet também é um ponto positivo Bons dispositivos de entrada, software abrangente e carga rápida, completam o pacote.

No decorrer de nossa análise, também surgiram alguns pontos negativos: Os patches de segurança não estão atualizados, há muitos recursos de bloatware pré-instalados, o Wi-Fi é realmente lento e o GPS leva muito tempo para adquirir uma localização. O alto desempenho também não está disponível o tempo todo e o tablet se afoga drasticamente de vez em quando. Além disso, o dispositivo poderia ter sido um pouco mais rígido. A falta de rigidez elimina a impressão geral de alto valor que o tablet deixa.

Um tablet caro que vale o dinheiro.

No entanto, devido a que as câmeras são muito boas para um tablet e os dispositivos de entrada funcionam de forma muito confiável e oferecem opções de personalização extensas, podemos facilmente dar ao Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 uma recomendação clara. Aqueles que não precisam da funcionalidade LTE podem economizar dinheiro obtendo uma versão Wi-Fi simples. 

Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 - 04/09/2018 v6
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
85%
Teclado
71 / 80 → 89%
Mouse
90%
Conectividade
43 / 65 → 67%
Peso
83 / 40-88 → 90%
Bateria
93%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
53 / 68 → 78%
Desempenho da aplicação
57 / 76 → 75%
Temperatura
93%
Ruído
100%
Audio
76 / 91 → 84%
Camera
68 / 85 → 79%
Médio
77%
88%
Tablet - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Tablet Huawei MediaPad M5 (10,8 polegadas, LTE)
Florian Wimmer, 2018-04-16 (Update: 2018-04-23)