Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Tablet Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro

Manuel Masiero (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 08/28/2018

Refined version. Ainda mais rápido, LTE por padrão e com um stylus digital incluído: O Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro é o modelo irmão "afinado" do excelente MediaPad M5 10.8. Em nossa análise, determinamos se o tablet pode alcançar resultados igualmente convincentes.

Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (MediaPad Serie)
Processador
HiSilicon Kirin 960
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G71 MP8
Memória
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4
Pantalha
10.8 polegadas 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 280 PPI, 2K, ClariVu, WQXGA, native pen support, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 51.5 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, 1 Docking Station Port, Conexões Audio: Audio output through USB type-C, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 256 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de gravidade, acelerômetro, giroscópio, bússola, hall effect sensor, WiFi Direct, aptX, USB-OTG
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM, UMTS, LTE Cat. 6, download/upload até 300/50 Mbit/s
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.3 x 258.7 x 171.8
Bateria
28.5 Wh, 7500 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Quick Charge 9 V / 2 A, Tempo de conversação 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 70 h, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 70 h, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 900 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 900 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.2, autofocus
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.2, fixed focus
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Quatro alto-falantes Harman-Kardon, Teclado: virtual, Carregador modular (9V/2A), cabo USB (type-C para type-A), adaptador de áudio (USB type-C para conector de 3,5 mm), Mate Pen 2, SIM tool, EMUI 8.0, Huawei HiSuite, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
498 g, Suprimento de energia: 75 g
Preço
549 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
570 MBit/s ∼100% +142%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
350 MBit/s ∼61% +48%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
262 MBit/s ∼46% +11%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
241 MBit/s ∼42% +2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
236 MBit/s ∼41%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
214 MBit/s ∼38% -9%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPad 6 2018
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe
500 MBit/s ∼100% +110%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
263 MBit/s ∼53% +11%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
240 MBit/s ∼48% +1%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
238 MBit/s ∼48%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
237 MBit/s ∼47% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
227 MBit/s ∼45% -5%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro: Whole route
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro: Whole route
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro: Bridge
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro: Bridge
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro: Grove
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro: Grove
Garmin Edge 520: Whole route
Garmin Edge 520: Whole route
Garmin Edge 520: Bridge
Garmin Edge 520: Bridge
Garmin Edge 520: Grove
Garmin Edge 520: Grove

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
374
cd/m²
368
cd/m²
322
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
366
cd/m²
365
cd/m²
334
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 384 cd/m² Médio: 360.2 cd/m² Minimum: 3.39 cd/m²
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 384 cd/m²
Contraste: 480:1 (Preto: 0.8 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.83 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 7.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.199
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Apple iPad 6 2018
IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8
Screen
22%
55%
52%
40%
60%
Brightness middle
384
340
-11%
530
38%
443
15%
426
11%
382
-1%
Brightness
360
320
-11%
513
43%
428
19%
399
11%
378
5%
Brightness Distribution
84
84
0%
92
10%
94
12%
91
8%
92
10%
Black Level *
0.8
0.19
76%
0.61
24%
0.36
55%
0.38
52%
0.24
70%
Contrast
480
1789
273%
869
81%
1231
156%
1121
134%
1592
232%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.83
15
-120%
1.2
82%
3.3
52%
4.5
34%
2.8
59%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
12.7
22.8
-80%
3.2
75%
7.2
43%
7.9
38%
6
53%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.5
4
47%
1
87%
2.9
61%
5.2
31%
3.5
53%
Gamma
2.199 100%
2.09 105%
2.28 96%
2.27 97%
2.23 99%
2.33 94%
CCT
8544 76%
6940 94%
6588 99%
6961 93%
6875 95%
6903 94%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 250 Hz ≤ 15 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8946 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41.2 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
157445 Points ∼68%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
147305 Points ∼64% -6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (124087 - 157445, n=7)
143408 Points ∼62% -9%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
78980 Points ∼34% -50%
Average of class Tablet (14200 - 227987, n=55)
71096 Points ∼31% -55%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
63777 Points ∼28% -59%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
62725 Points ∼27% -60%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
175581 Points ∼60%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (170015 - 181614, n=4)
174560 Points ∼60% -1%
Apple iPad 6 2018
170921 Points ∼59% -3%
Average of class Tablet (44992 - 181614, n=8)
131941 Points ∼45% -25%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
113687 Points ∼39% -35%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
77717 Points ∼27% -56%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (6006 - 6299, n=7)
6136 Points ∼60% +2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
6039 Points ∼59%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
5114 Points ∼50% -15%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
4827 Points ∼47% -20%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
4626 Points ∼45% -23%
Average of class Tablet (2345 - 6047, n=21)
4181 Points ∼41% -31%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3678 Points ∼36% -39%
Work performance score
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (6830 - 7403, n=7)
7199 Points ∼70% +5%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
6830 Points ∼67%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
5843 Points ∼57% -14%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
5648 Points ∼55% -17%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
5040 Points ∼49% -26%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4895 Points ∼48% -28%
Average of class Tablet (1873 - 7053, n=62)
4523 Points ∼44% -34%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Apple iPad 6 2018
1628 Points ∼96% +78%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (913 - 1215, n=7)
1076 Points ∼63% +18%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1010 Points ∼60% +11%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
913 Points ∼54%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
850 Points ∼50% -7%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
811 Points ∼48% -11%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
803 Points ∼47% -12%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 1628, n=90)
727 Points ∼43% -20%
Graphics
Apple iPad 6 2018
6760 Points ∼73% +196%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (2284 - 4143, n=7)
3731 Points ∼40% +63%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
2284 Points ∼25%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1602 Points ∼17% -30%
Average of class Tablet (98 - 8602, n=90)
1536 Points ∼17% -33%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
1015 Points ∼11% -56%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
833 Points ∼9% -64%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
701 Points ∼8% -69%
Memory
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (2778 - 4277, n=7)
3512 Points ∼73% +13%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
3108 Points ∼65%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2654 Points ∼55% -15%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1513 Points ∼32% -51%
Apple iPad 6 2018
1334 Points ∼28% -57%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
972 Points ∼20% -69%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
968 Points ∼20% -69%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 3985, n=90)
943 Points ∼20% -70%
System
Apple iPad 6 2018
6820 Points ∼66% +87%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (3572 - 4154, n=7)
3826 Points ∼37% +5%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
3639 Points ∼35%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
3214 Points ∼31% -12%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2838 Points ∼28% -22%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2329 Points ∼23% -36%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1957 Points ∼19% -46%
Average of class Tablet (482 - 6820, n=90)
1913 Points ∼19% -47%
Overall
Apple iPad 6 2018
3163 Points ∼73% +44%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (2204 - 2985, n=7)
2701 Points ∼63% +23%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
2204 Points ∼51%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1769 Points ∼41% -20%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1312 Points ∼30% -40%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
1281 Points ∼30% -42%
Average of class Tablet (167 - 3282, n=90)
1066 Points ∼25% -52%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1016 Points ∼24% -54%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
11575 Points ∼80%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (9492 - 11539, n=4)
5258 (min: 9492, max: 11539) Points ∼36%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 11575, n=17)
4068 Points ∼28%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
3235 Points ∼22%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3081 Points ∼21%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1562 Points ∼11%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (6173 - 6527, n=7)
6384 Points ∼18% +3%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
6173 Points ∼17%
Apple iPad 6 2018
5952 Points ∼16% -4%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
5809 Points ∼16% -6%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
4323 Points ∼12% -30%
Average of class Tablet (1216 - 9358, n=27)
3898 Points ∼11% -37%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3305 Points ∼9% -46%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
2489 Points ∼7% -60%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPad 6 2018
3499 Points ∼59% +85%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
1892 Points ∼32%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (1852 - 1899, n=7)
1875 Points ∼32% -1%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1634 Points ∼28% -14%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1541 Points ∼26% -19%
Average of class Tablet (448 - 3933, n=27)
1444 Points ∼24% -24%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1204 Points ∼20% -36%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
868 Points ∼15% -54%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2419 Points ∼66% 0%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
2416 Points ∼66%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (1679 - 2653, n=7)
2181 Points ∼59% -10%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
1991 Points ∼54% -18%
Apple iPad 6 2018
1439 Points ∼39% -40%
Average of class Tablet (793 - 2700, n=44)
1391 Points ∼38% -42%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1363 Points ∼37% -44%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
843 Points ∼23% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Apple iPad 6 2018
3682 Points ∼68% +124%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (1646 - 2798, n=7)
2063 Points ∼38% +25%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
1646 Points ∼31%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1504 Points ∼28% -9%
Average of class Tablet (102 - 5384, n=44)
1205 Points ∼22% -27%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
557 Points ∼10% -66%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
413 Points ∼8% -75%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
381 Points ∼7% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Apple iPad 6 2018
2735 Points ∼58% +54%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (1747 - 2666, n=7)
2064 Points ∼44% +17%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
1771 Points ∼37%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1642 Points ∼35% -7%
Average of class Tablet (134 - 3806, n=49)
1044 Points ∼22% -41%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
602 Points ∼13% -66%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
489 Points ∼10% -72%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
464 Points ∼10% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2445 Points ∼67% +3%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
2366 Points ∼65%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (1662 - 2555, n=7)
2086 Points ∼57% -12%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
2031 Points ∼56% -14%
Apple iPad 6 2018
1535 Points ∼42% -35%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1347 Points ∼37% -43%
Average of class Tablet (810 - 2780, n=47)
1324 Points ∼36% -44%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1128 Points ∼31% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Apple iPad 6 2018
6095 Points ∼73% +155%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (1856 - 2990, n=7)
2496 Points ∼30% +4%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
2392 Points ∼29%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1719 Points ∼21% -28%
Average of class Tablet (42 - 7525, n=47)
1671 Points ∼20% -30%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
884 Points ∼11% -63%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
731 Points ∼9% -69%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
598 Points ∼7% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Apple iPad 6 2018
3672 Points ∼58% +54%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
2386 Points ∼37%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (1865 - 2649, n=7)
2374 Points ∼37% -1%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1840 Points ∼29% -23%
Average of class Tablet (53 - 4588, n=51)
1299 Points ∼20% -46%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
929 Points ∼15% -61%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
852 Points ∼13% -64%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
682 Points ∼11% -71%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
15850 Points ∼20% +10%
Apple iPad 6 2018
15499 Points ∼20% +7%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
15117 Points ∼19% +5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (14456 - 15341, n=6)
15019 Points ∼19% +4%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
14698 Points ∼19% +2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
14456 Points ∼18%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 27021, n=129)
12651 Points ∼16% -12%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
9729 Points ∼12% -33%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPad 6 2018
62626 Points ∼13% +79%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
35210 Points ∼7% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (32243 - 38979, n=6)
35199 Points ∼7% 0%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
35076 Points ∼7%
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 110971, n=129)
16481 Points ∼3% -53%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
13239 Points ∼3% -62%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
12771 Points ∼3% -64%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
11719 Points ∼2% -67%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Apple iPad 6 2018
37372 Points ∼18% +40%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (25766 - 28883, n=6)
27083 Points ∼13% +2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
26875 Points ∼13% +1%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
26634 Points ∼13%
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 54449, n=130)
13998 Points ∼7% -47%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
13742 Points ∼7% -48%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
13227 Points ∼6% -50%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
11209 Points ∼5% -58%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad 6 2018
125 fps ∼7% +34%
Apple iPad 6 2018
118 fps ∼7% +27%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
96 fps ∼6% +3%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
93 fps ∼5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (43 - 93, n=7)
68.4 fps ∼4% -26%
Average of class Tablet (4.2 - 225, n=156)
24.5 fps ∼1% -74%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
23 fps ∼1% -75%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
22 fps ∼1% -76%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
18 fps ∼1% -81%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad 6 2018
59.7 fps ∼13% +5%
Apple iPad 6 2018
59 fps ∼13% +4%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
57 fps ∼12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (40 - 60, n=7)
53.9 fps ∼12% -5%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
40 fps ∼9% -30%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
21 fps ∼5% -63%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
20 fps ∼4% -65%
Average of class Tablet (3.7 - 59.7, n=160)
19 fps ∼4% -67%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
17 fps ∼4% -70%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Apple iPad 6 2018
62.6 fps ∼11% +53%
Apple iPad 6 2018
58.9 fps ∼11% +44%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
44 fps ∼8% +7%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
41 fps ∼7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (19 - 41, n=7)
31.7 fps ∼6% -23%
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 110, n=95)
16 fps ∼3% -61%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.9 fps ∼2% -76%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
9.8 fps ∼2% -76%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
8.5 fps ∼2% -79%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad 6 2018
40.9 fps ∼11% +51%
Apple iPad 6 2018
40.3 fps ∼11% +49%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (20 - 37, n=7)
28.1 fps ∼8% +4%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
27 fps ∼7%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
26 fps ∼7% -4%
Average of class Tablet (2.9 - 58, n=98)
12.4 fps ∼3% -54%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.5 fps ∼3% -65%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
9.2 fps ∼3% -66%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
8.3 fps ∼2% -69%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad 6 2018
42.7 fps ∼8% +53%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
28 fps ∼5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (21 - 28, n=7)
24 fps ∼4% -14%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
18 fps ∼3% -36%
Average of class Tablet (2 - 83, n=45)
15.5 fps ∼3% -45%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
6.4 fps ∼1% -77%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6 fps ∼1% -79%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.9 fps ∼1% -82%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad 6 2018
27.3 fps ∼16% +71%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (12 - 28, n=7)
18.6 fps ∼11% +16%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
16 fps ∼9%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
15 fps ∼9% -6%
Average of class Tablet (4.3 - 54.3, n=45)
10.6 fps ∼6% -34%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
6 fps ∼3% -62%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
5.7 fps ∼3% -64%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.7 fps ∼3% -71%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad 6 2018
26.8 fps ∼7% +68%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
18 fps ∼5% +13%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
16 fps ∼4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (15 - 16, n=7)
13.1 fps ∼3% -18%
Average of class Tablet (2 - 26.8, n=24)
8.43 fps ∼2% -47%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
3.5 fps ∼1% -78%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3 fps ∼1% -81%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps ∼1% -87%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad 6 2018
17.9 fps ∼15% +92%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (9.3 - 16, n=7)
12.2 fps ∼10% +31%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
10 fps ∼9% +8%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
9.3 fps ∼8%
Average of class Tablet (2 - 17.9, n=24)
5.93 fps ∼5% -36%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
3.3 fps ∼3% -65%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3.1 fps ∼3% -67%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps ∼2% -78%

Legend

 
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 Mediatek MT8176, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPad 6 2018 Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 32 GB NVMe
 
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 Mediatek MT8173, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 HiSilicon Kirin 960s, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3)
27967 Points ∼100% +136%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91)
11854 Points ∼42%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (10016 - 11897, n=7)
10823 Points ∼39% -9%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
8897 Points ∼32% -25%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
8570 Points ∼31% -28%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
6802 Points ∼24% -43%
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 31188, n=146)
5816 Points ∼21% -51%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60)
4502 Points ∼16% -62%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3)
200 Points ∼100% +12%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91)
178 Points ∼89%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (107 - 184, n=7)
148 Points ∼74% -17%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
137 Points ∼69% -23%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
116 Points ∼58% -35%
Average of class Tablet (36 - 257, n=64)
99.8 Points ∼50% -44%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60)
93 Points ∼47% -48%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3)
167.2 Points ∼100% +193%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (56.8 - 68.6, n=7)
59.3 Points ∼35% +4%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91)
57.007 Points ∼34%
Average of class Tablet (12 - 202, n=61)
50.4 Points ∼30% -12%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
47.337 Points ∼28% -17%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
46.39 Points ∼28% -19%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
36.127 Points ∼22% -37%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60)
25.761 Points ∼15% -55%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (969 - 43092, n=157)
9439 ms * ∼100% -164%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60)
9236.5 ms * ∼98% -158%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
5947 ms * ∼63% -66%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
3975.5 ms * ∼42% -11%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
3756.1 ms * ∼40% -5%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91)
3575.4 ms * ∼38%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (2734 - 3734, n=7)
3226 ms * ∼34% +10%
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3)
1025.5 ms * ∼11% +71%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 ProAcer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50Lenovo Tab 4 10 PlusAmazon Fire HD 10 2017Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-27%
6%
-14%
70%
18%
-53%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
73.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
56.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-22%
61.1
-16%
30.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-59%
73.84 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
52.6 (14.1 - 74.7, n=57)
-28%
42.1 (14.6 - 73.8, n=37)
-42%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
80.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
83.9
-1%
55.49 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-35%
85.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
71.8 (21.1 - 86.9, n=57)
-15%
60.6 (34.4 - 87.7, n=37)
-29%
Random Write 4KB
15.35
8.77
-43%
11.8
-23%
9.37
-39%
60.8
296%
17 (3.4 - 77.9, n=65)
11%
4.51 (0.13 - 77.9, n=185)
-71%
Random Read 4KB
27.41
13.7
-50%
37.3
36%
27.72
1%
54.7
100%
48.1 (11.4 - 149, n=65)
75%
15.8 (1.32 - 94.2, n=185)
-42%
Sequential Write 256KB
94.08
92.38
-2%
135.5
44%
147.67
57%
126.8
35%
159 (40 - 216, n=65)
69%
32.4 (2.04 - 208, n=185)
-66%
Sequential Read 256KB
278.59
173.7
-38%
270.1
-3%
262.2
-6%
247.8
-11%
268 (115 - 704, n=65)
-4%
96.4 (6.75 - 289, n=185)
-65%
Shadow Fight 3
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
comparado com
Motorola Moto X Play (min)
 615 MSM8939, Adreno 405
30
   ...
Nokia 8 Sirocco
 835, Adreno 540
60
OnePlus 6
 845, Adreno 630
60
   ...
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (max)
 Kirin 960, Mali-G71 MP8
60
Battle Bay
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 full resolution60 fps
Carga Máxima
 33.8 °C37.1 °C33.2 °C 
 33.6 °C34.6 °C33.4 °C 
 34.1 °C33.4 °C32.5 °C 
Máximo: 37.1 °C
Médio: 34 °C
34.5 °C39.5 °C36 °C
33.8 °C35.7 °C34.9 °C
33.2 °C34.3 °C34.4 °C
Máximo: 39.5 °C
Médio: 35.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  42.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203237.72531.931.13131.731.14031.132.75036.235.96326.332.48022.232.210022.53812525.445.516018.952.820017.159.825016.962.43151462.640013.568.750013.869.263012.571.380012.175100011.475125011.273.416001170200010.871.4250010.574.3315010.874.6400010.373.1500010.375.2630010.469.4800010.563.51000010.459.41250010.351.31600010.447.1SPL70.765.523.884.6N2718.20.562.7median 11.2Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Promedian 69.2Delta2.59.132.73430.830.331.132.53435.832.432.129.23033.931.128.338.326.351.826.148.624.351.922.955.1225522.363.320.962.42060.519.363.218.959.918.562.317.962.217.862.817.669.317.864.717.761.717.659.317.666.217.861.317.856.717.759.217.862.130.875.71.537.2median 18.5Apple iPad 6 2018median 61.32.33.828.630.224.926.624.624.426.422.530.824.623.619.820.221.119.928.817.642.919.159.719.159.617.456.616.961.616.863.515.166.316.567.815.666.41561.915.565.115.367.615.771.515.569.715.572.815.467.915.8641663.815.860.816.154.716.151.617.349.727.979.9146.4median 16Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8median 63.50.65.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 36%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple iPad 6 2018 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 36%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 36%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.06 / 0.1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3.3 / 4.2 / 7 Watt
Carga midlight 10.4 / 13.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
7500 mAh
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6100 mAh
Apple iPad 6 2018
 mAh
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
7000 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
7500 mAh
Power Consumption
2%
-16%
43%
31%
13%
Idle Minimum *
3.3
3.21
3%
2.2
33%
1.23
63%
1.55
53%
2.01
39%
Idle Average *
4.2
5.97
-42%
7.8
-86%
3.92
7%
4.17
1%
5.4
-29%
Idle Maximum *
7
6.19
12%
7.9
-13%
4.03
42%
4.25
39%
5.44
22%
Load Average *
10.4
9.72
7%
12.6
-21%
5
52%
7.13
31%
8.55
18%
Load Maximum *
13.8
9.97
28%
12.8
7%
7.09
49%
9.63
30%
11.53
16%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
20h 54min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 10min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 29min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 40min
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
7500 mAh
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6100 mAh
Apple iPad 6 2018
 mAh
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
7000 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
7500 mAh
Battery Runtime
-34%
-5%
17%
-6%
1%
Reader / Idle
1254
735
-41%
1625
30%
960
-23%
1344
7%
H.264
629
795
26%
585
-7%
702
12%
WiFi v1.3
670
387
-42%
714
7%
647
-3%
542
-19%
648
-3%
Load
220
175
-20%
185
-16%
256
16%
274
25%
196
-11%

Pro

+ Acabamento de alta qualidade
+ LTE Cat.4
+ 64 GB de armazenamento
+ 4 alto-falantes
+ Android 8.0
+ Tela de alta resolução
+ Boa câmera
+ Muito veloz
+ Stylus digital
+ Permanece frio durante o uso
+ Duração da bateria sólida
+ Carga rápida

Contra

- Sem conector de 3,5 mm
- O sistema ocupa muito espaço
- Wi-Fi não particularmente rápido
- Bloatware pré instalado
- Porta USB 3.0 com velocidades USB 2.0
- Luminância fraca da tela
- Afogamento sob uso intenso
Review: Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro. Test device supplied by Huawei Germany.
Review: Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro. Test device supplied by Huawei Germany.

Tela 2K de alta resolução, 4 alto-falantes Harman Kardon, uma boa câmera, sólida duração da bateria e carregamento rápido - o MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro compartilha basicamente todos as virtudes do MediaPad X1 10.8. Além disso, ele vem com três bons recursos extras: A caneta digital, LTE por padrão e o SoC ligeiramente mais rápido. Comparado ao seu modelo irmão, o tablet também teve resultados de GPS mais convincentes, mas ficou para trás em termos de propriedades de tela.

O Huawei MediaPad M 5 10.8 Pro é um tablet caro, que, além de sua caneta digital, varia muito pouco do significativamente mais barato MediaPad M5 10.8

Quem precisa do MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro? Dado que o MediaPad X1 10.8 já se desempenhou maravilhosamente, teríamos que ser muito pressionados para encontrar uma razão para escolher o candidato de teste nominalmente mais rápido e não o visivelmente mais rápido. Além disso, o LTE também está disponível no modelo irmão mais barato, o que essencialmente reduz o motivo central da compra do Mate Pen 2. Embora combinado com a tela responsiva e precisa, ela proporciona uma experiência de escrita agradável, essa experiência tem um preço. Oficialmente, o MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro custa 100 Euros (~$116) a mais do que um MediaPad X1 10.8 em sua configuração máxima.

Independentemente da variante que escolha, você não fará uma compra ruim. Atualmente, o MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro e o MediaPad X1 10.8 pertencem aos tablets Android mais rápidos e bem equipados do mercado.

Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro - 08/22/2018 v6
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
85%
Teclado
71 / 80 → 89%
Mouse
93%
Conectividade
48 / 65 → 73%
Peso
83 / 40-88 → 90%
Bateria
93%
Pantalha
79%
Desempenho do jogos
55 / 68 → 81%
Desempenho da aplicação
59 / 76 → 77%
Temperatura
90%
Ruído
100%
Audio
76 / 91 → 84%
Camera
68 / 85 → 79%
Médio
77%
88%
Tablet - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Tablet Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
Manuel Masiero, 2018-08-28 (Update: 2018-09- 9)