Breve Análise do Tablet Lenovo Tab P10
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix , Fixed focus
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Chuwi HiPad | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Lenovo Tab P10 | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Lenovo Tab P10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Chuwi HiPad |
|
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 522 cd/m²
Contraste: 1273:1 (Preto: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.7 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 9.1 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.14
Lenovo Tab P10 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10 | Chuwi HiPad IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10 | Chuwi Hi9 Plus IPS, 2560x1600, 10.80 | Huawei MediaPad T5 10 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10 | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 IPS, 2560x1600, 10.80 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N IPS, 1920x1200, 10.50 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 4% | -1% | 10% | 25% | 30% | |
Brightness middle | 522 | 408.7 -22% | 308 -41% | 356 -32% | 382 -27% | 556 7% |
Brightness | 495 | 396 -20% | 297 -40% | 340 -31% | 378 -24% | 514 4% |
Brightness Distribution | 84 | 85 1% | 92 10% | 92 10% | 92 10% | 87 4% |
Black Level * | 0.41 | 0.51 -24% | 0.29 29% | 0.5 -22% | 0.24 41% | 0.42 -2% |
Contrast | 1273 | 801 -37% | 1062 -17% | 712 -44% | 1592 25% | 1324 4% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 6.7 | 4.13 38% | 6.2 7% | 2.3 66% | 2.8 58% | 1.8 73% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 12.2 | 7.34 40% | 10.5 14% | 6.5 47% | 6 51% | 3.2 74% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 9.1 | 4.4 52% | 6.6 27% | 1.4 85% | 3.5 62% | 2.2 76% |
Gamma | 2.14 103% | 2.24 98% | 2.19 100% | 2.16 102% | 2.33 94% | 2.26 97% |
CCT | 9417 69% | 7389 88% | 8216 79% | 6565 99% | 6903 94% | 6819 95% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 34250 Hz | ≤ 4 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 34250 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 4 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 34250 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9693 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.2 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
64.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 28.4 ms rise | |
↘ 36 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.5 ms). |
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 | |
Compute RenderScript Score | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Average of class Tablet (840 - 43802, n=46) | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus | |
Chuwi HiPad | |
Lenovo Tab P10 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (2777 - 3374, n=10) | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Chuwi HiPad | |
Average of class Tablet (1106 - 18041, n=63) | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3272 - 4022, n=13) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
Lenovo Tab P10 | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Chuwi HiPad | |
Average of class Tablet (429 - 5002, n=63) | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (741 - 787, n=13) | |
Lenovo Tab P10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N |
PCMark for Android | |
Work 2.0 performance score | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Average of class Tablet (4267 - 12603, n=64) | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (4171 - 4759, n=13) | |
Chuwi HiPad | |
Lenovo Tab P10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus | |
Work performance score | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 | |
Chuwi HiPad | |
Average of class Tablet (1873 - 14982, n=99) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (4836 - 6062, n=13) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Lenovo Tab P10 | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus | |
Chuwi HiPad | |
Average of class Tablet (1 - 451, n=201) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (21 - 23, n=12) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
Lenovo Tab P10 | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 | |
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Chuwi HiPad | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (20 - 34, n=12) | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus | |
Average of class Tablet (1.1 - 120, n=205) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
Lenovo Tab P10 | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Average of class Tablet (1.6 - 220, n=135) | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus | |
Chuwi HiPad | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (9.2 - 9.4, n=12) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
Lenovo Tab P10 | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Chuwi HiPad | |
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 110, n=140) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (8.7 - 18, n=12) | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
Lenovo Tab P10 | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 173, n=87) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus | |
Chuwi HiPad | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (6 - 6.9, n=12) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
Lenovo Tab P10 | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 95, n=87) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Chuwi HiPad | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (5.7 - 13, n=12) | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
Lenovo Tab P10 | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Average of class Tablet (14200 - 227987, n=67) | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 | |
Lenovo Tab P10 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (54731 - 60077, n=10) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N |
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score | |
Average of class Tablet (20856 - 566378, n=32) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus | |
Chuwi HiPad | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 | |
Lenovo Tab P10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (56497 - 73468, n=11) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average of class Tablet (10.9 - 376, n=112) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
Chuwi HiPad (Chrome 71.0.3578.99) | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus (Google Chrome 70) | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (22 - 22.7, n=12) | |
Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 58568, n=197) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
Chuwi HiPad (Chrome 71.0.3578.99) | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus (Chrome 70) | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100) | |
Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3470 - 4115, n=13) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (11012 - 11863, n=13) | |
Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71) | |
Chuwi HiPad (Chrome 71.0.3578.99) | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67) | |
Average of class Tablet (464 - 43092, n=209) | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus (Chrome 70) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
Average of class Tablet (36 - 386, n=78) | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67) | |
Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (90 - 103, n=7) |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo Tab P10 | Chuwi HiPad | Chuwi Hi9 Plus | Huawei MediaPad T5 10 | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -31% | -44% | 66% | 44% | -6% | 10% | -38% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 60.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 66.81 10% | 20.44 -66% | 72.53 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 19% | 73.84 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 21% | 60.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1% | 58.4 (11.2 - 74.7, n=140) -4% | 50.7 (14 - 73.8, n=75) -17% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 84.28 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 65.93 -22% | 21.16 -75% | 83.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0% | 85.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1% | 80.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -4% | 77.3 (21.1 - 87.2, n=140) -8% | 68.7 (17.6 - 87.7, n=75) -18% |
Random Write 4KB | 15.75 | 10.28 -35% | 13.01 -17% | 76.12 383% | 60.8 286% | 13.39 -15% | 28.7 (3.4 - 147, n=159) 82% | 11.9 (0.13 - 262, n=228) -24% |
Random Read 4KB | 53.9 | 40.21 -25% | 42.2 -22% | 76.67 42% | 54.7 1% | 71.13 32% | 57.3 (11.4 - 149, n=159) 6% | 26.2 (1.04 - 230, n=228) -51% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 205.74 | 73.55 -64% | 132.47 -36% | 83.84 -59% | 126.8 -38% | 103.32 -50% | 177 (40 - 254, n=159) -14% | 57.9 (2.04 - 732, n=228) -72% |
Sequential Read 256KB | 276.7 | 144.33 -48% | 144.97 -48% | 312.17 13% | 247.8 -10% | 285.63 3% | 274 (95.6 - 704, n=159) -1% | 152 (6.75 - 1789, n=228) -45% |
PUBG Mobile
Arena of Valor
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 34.5 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22.2 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 30.5 °C / 87 F.
Lenovo Tab P10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
desligado | ![]() ![]() |
Ocioso | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Carga |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo Tab P10 7000 mAh | Chuwi HiPad 7000 mAh | Chuwi Hi9 Plus 7000 mAh | Huawei MediaPad T5 10 5100 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 7500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N 7300 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -68% | -63% | -104% | -57% | -5% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.01 | 2.7 -167% | 2.18 -116% | 2.33 -131% | 2.01 -99% | 1.26 -25% |
Idle Average * | 4.16 | 5.5 -32% | 5.29 -27% | 8.46 -103% | 5.4 -30% | 4.22 -1% |
Idle Maximum * | 4.17 | 5.6 -34% | 5.37 -29% | 8.49 -104% | 5.44 -30% | 4.29 -3% |
Load Average * | 5.45 | 7 -28% | 8.56 -57% | 11.14 -104% | 8.55 -57% | 5.48 -1% |
Load Maximum * | 6.9 | 12.2 -77% | 12.86 -86% | 12.3 -78% | 11.53 -67% | 6.57 5% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo Tab P10 7000 mAh | Lenovo Tablet 10-20L3000KGE 5070 mAh | Chuwi HiPad 7000 mAh | Chuwi Hi9 Plus 7000 mAh | Huawei MediaPad T5 10 5100 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 7500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N 7300 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -40% | -38% | -37% | 13% | -22% | 21% | |
Reader / Idle | 1315 | 1241 -6% | 3329 153% | 1344 2% | 1960 49% | ||
H.264 | 910 | 580 -36% | 702 -23% | 963 6% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 992 | 593 -40% | 616 -38% | 634 -36% | 525 -47% | 648 -35% | 938 -5% |
Load | 289 | 93 -68% | 241 -17% | 196 -32% | 385 33% |
Pro
Contra
O Lenovo Tab P10 é um tablet decente que tem uma pontuação geral que está no mesmo nível do Hi9Plus e do MediaPad T5 10 e está aquém do Galaxy Tab A. Não recomendamos o Tab P10 como um tablet para jogos, não é poderoso o suficiente para jogos com fome de desempenho. O tablet é adequado para jogos simples e tarefas gerais, como navegação na web, e-mails e assistir a vídeos.
O Lenovo Tab P10 é um tablet leve e elegante que está bem equipado, mas existem tablets mais potentes e com preços comparáveis no mercado.
O Tab P10 parece caro, graças à parte traseira do vidro e à estrutura metálica chanfrada, além de ter mais RAM e armazenamento interno do que os nossos dispositivos de comparação.
No entanto, recomendaríamos que espere até que a Lenovo liberte seu pacote Smart Dock, já que a empresa venderá o pacote pelo mesmo preço que atualmente vende o tablet. A Lenovo lançará primeiro o pacote para o Tab M10, após o qual começará a vender o pacote Tab P10. A empresa inicialmente venderá o pacote com 3 GB de RAM e 32 GB de versão de armazenamento, portanto, pode ser uma decisão mais sensata comprar a versão de maior capacidade se você não quiser a funcionalidade Amazon Alexa.
Lenovo Tab P10 - 01/21/2019 v6(old)
Inge Schwabe