Breve Análise do Tablet Lenovo Tab P10

Name: Lenovo Tab P10
Brand: Lenovo

Detached - O Lenovo Tab P10 é mais esteticamente agradável do que a maioria dos tablets Android. Sua traseira de vidro é ótima, e funciona como uma tela inteligente quando conectada ao novo Lenovo Smart Dock, graças à sua integração com o Amazon Alexa. No entanto, o dispositivo é impulsionado por um lento SoC Snapdragon 450, e o dock só está disponível para compra como parte de um pacote com o tablet, por isso não é uma navegação tão fluente. Continue lendo para descobrir como este tablet de gama média se compara aos concorrentes.

Inge Schwabe, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 01/23/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smart Home Tablet Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Lenovo Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

A look at the glass back on the Lenovo Tab P10

A look at the front of the Lenovo Tab P10

One the Tab P10’s four speakers and the pogo pin connectors

A look at the front of the Tab P10 in portrait mode

The included European charger and USB Type-A to Type-C cable

Os Top 10

» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros

Size Comparison

Chuwi Hi9 Plus Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Chuwi HiPad Huawei MediaPad T5 10 Lenovo Tab P10 ❌

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Chuwi HiPad Mali-T880 MP4, MT6797X, 32 GB eMMC Flash	248 MBit/s ∼100% +16%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash	229 MBit/s ∼92% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash	216 (49^min - 250^max) MBit/s ∼87% +1%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash	214 MBit/s ∼86% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10 Adreno 506, SD 450, 64 GB eMMC Flash	214 (206^min - 223^max) MBit/s ∼86%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus Mali-T880 MP4, MT6797X, 64 GB eMMC Flash	197 (191^min - 201^max) MBit/s ∼79% -8%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Tab P10 Adreno 506, SD 450, 64 GB eMMC Flash	326 (314^min - 338^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash	312 (291^min - 325^max) MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus Mali-T880 MP4, MT6797X, 64 GB eMMC Flash	248 (114^min - 278^max) MBit/s ∼76% -24%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash	239 MBit/s ∼73% -27%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash	237 MBit/s ∼73% -27%
Chuwi HiPad Mali-T880 MP4, MT6797X, 32 GB eMMC Flash	195 MBit/s ∼60% -40%

Lenovo Tab P10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø214 (206-223)

Chuwi Hi9 Plus MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X, ARM Mali-T880 MP4; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø197 (191-201)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø216 (49-250)

Lenovo Tab P10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø326 (314-338)

Chuwi Hi9 Plus MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X, ARM Mali-T880 MP4; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø248 (114-278)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø312 (291-325)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Lenovo Tab P10

Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium

Apple iPhone Xs

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Lenovo Tab P10

Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium

Apple iPhone Xs

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Lenovo Tab P10

Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium

Apple iPhone Xs

Canon EOS 70D

ColorChecker Passport: The lower half of each area of colour displays the reference colour


462 cd/m²	505 cd/m²	527 cd/m²
457 cd/m²	522 cd/m²	528 cd/m²
441 cd/m²	506 cd/m²	506 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 528 cd/m² Médio: 494.9 cd/m² Minimum: 5.14 cd/m²
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 522 cd/m²
Contraste: 1273:1 (Preto: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.7 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 9.1 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.14

	Lenovo Tab P10 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10	Chuwi HiPad IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10	Chuwi Hi9 Plus IPS, 2560x1600, 10.80	Huawei MediaPad T5 10 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10	Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 IPS, 2560x1600, 10.80	Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N IPS, 1920x1200, 10.50
Screen		4%	-1%	10%	25%	30%
Brightness middle	522	408.7 -22%	308 -41%	356 -32%	382 -27%	556 7%
Brightness	495	396 -20%	297 -40%	340 -31%	378 -24%	514 4%
Brightness Distribution	84	85 1%	92 10%	92 10%	92 10%	87 4%
Black Level *	0.41	0.51 -24%	0.29 29%	0.5 -22%	0.24 41%	0.42 -2%
Contrast	1273	801 -37%	1062 -17%	712 -44%	1592 25%	1324 4%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	6.7	4.13 38%	6.2 7%	2.3 66%	2.8 58%	1.8 73%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	12.2	7.34 40%	10.5 14%	6.5 47%	6 51%	3.2 74%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	9.1	4.4 52%	6.6 27%	1.4 85%	3.5 62%	2.2 76%
Gamma	2.14 ^103%	2.24 ^98%	2.19 ^100%	2.16 ^102%	2.33 ^94%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	9417 ^69%	7389 ^88%	8216 ^79%	6565 ^99%	6903 ^94%	6819 ^95%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

34250 Hz

≤ 4 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 34250 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 4 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 34250 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9693 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9.2 ms rise
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
64.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 28.4 ms rise
64.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 36 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.5 ms).

Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	11575 Points ∼26% +255%
Average of class Tablet (840 - 43802, n=46)	5653 Points ∼13% +73%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	3685 Points ∼8% +13%
Chuwi HiPad	3643 Points ∼8% +12%
Lenovo Tab P10	3261 Points ∼7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (2777 - 3374, n=10)	3146 Points ∼7% -4%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	3077 Points ∼7% -6%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	5809 Points ∼9% +57%
Chuwi HiPad	5064 Points ∼8% +37%
Average of class Tablet (1106 - 18041, n=63)	4723 Points ∼7% +27%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	4636 Points ∼7% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3272 - 4022, n=13)	3862 Points ∼6% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	3846 Points ∼6% +4%
Lenovo Tab P10	3705 Points ∼6%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	3316 Points ∼5% -10%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Chuwi HiPad	1797 Points ∼22% +141%
Average of class Tablet (429 - 5002, n=63)	1656 Points ∼20% +122%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	1641 Points ∼20% +120%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	1634 Points ∼20% +119%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	885 Points ∼11% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (741 - 787, n=13)	761 Points ∼9% +2%
Lenovo Tab P10	747 Points ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	745 Points ∼9% 0%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	5114 Points ∼33% +20%
Average of class Tablet (4267 - 12603, n=64)	4950 Points ∼32% +16%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	4615 Points ∼30% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (4171 - 4759, n=13)	4493 Points ∼29% +6%
Chuwi HiPad	4354 Points ∼28% +2%
Lenovo Tab P10	4250 Points ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	4171 Points ∼27% -2%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	4077 Points ∼27% -4%
Work performance score
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	5798 Points ∼29% +17%
Chuwi HiPad	5463 Points ∼27% +10%
Average of class Tablet (1873 - 14982, n=99)	5370 Points ∼27% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (4836 - 6062, n=13)	5324 Points ∼27% +8%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	5040 Points ∼25% +2%
Lenovo Tab P10	4949 Points ∼25%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	4922 Points ∼25% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	4914 Points ∼25% -1%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	2323 Points ∼29% +30%
Average of class Tablet (650 - 4756, n=65)	1936 Points ∼24% +8%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	1804 Points ∼23% +1%
Lenovo Tab P10	1793 Points ∼23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1529 - 1826, n=13)	1771 Points ∼22% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	1768 Points ∼22% -1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	1635 Points ∼21% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (99 - 12112, n=65)	2109 Points ∼17% +409%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	2069 Points ∼17% +400%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	972 Points ∼8% +135%
Lenovo Tab P10	414 Points ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	413 Points ∼3% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (403 - 415, n=13)	412 Points ∼3% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	399 Points ∼3% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	2121 Points ∼22% +325%
Average of class Tablet (129 - 7701, n=65)	1811 Points ∼19% +263%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	1083 Points ∼11% +117%
Lenovo Tab P10	499 Points ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	498 Points ∼5% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (488 - 501, n=13)	497 Points ∼5% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	480 Points ∼5% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	2101 Points ∼36% +17%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	1871 Points ∼32% +4%
Average of class Tablet (739 - 4702, n=72)	1830 Points ∼32% +2%
Lenovo Tab P10	1793 Points ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	1766 Points ∼31% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1580 - 1816, n=13)	1760 Points ∼31% -2%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	1473 Points ∼26% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (165 - 28751, n=72)	3348 Points ∼12% +371%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	2208 Points ∼8% +211%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	1133 Points ∼4% +59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (702 - 718, n=13)	713 Points ∼2% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	712 Points ∼2% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10	711 Points ∼2%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	611 Points ∼2% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (207 - 13454, n=72)	2276 Points ∼17% +177%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	2183 Points ∼16% +166%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	1242 Points ∼9% +51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (808 - 828, n=13)	822 Points ∼6% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	821 Points ∼6% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10	821 Points ∼6%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	702 Points ∼5% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	2419 Points ∼45% +32%
Average of class Tablet (729 - 4201, n=81)	1835 Points ∼35% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10	1832 Points ∼34%
Chuwi HiPad	1803 Points ∼34% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1521 - 1855, n=13)	1784 Points ∼34% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	1775 Points ∼33% -3%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	1746 Points ∼33% -5%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	1654 Points ∼31% -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average of class Tablet (55 - 9612, n=81)	1663 Points ∼14% +357%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	1504 Points ∼13% +313%
Chuwi HiPad	632 Points ∼5% +74%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	626 Points ∼5% +72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (349 - 382, n=13)	365 Points ∼3% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10	364 Points ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	363 Points ∼3% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	140 Points ∼1% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	1642 Points ∼8% +271%
Average of class Tablet (70 - 7098, n=83)	1512 Points ∼7% +241%
Chuwi HiPad	739 Points ∼4% +67%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	726 Points ∼4% +64%
Lenovo Tab P10	443 Points ∼2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (438 - 449, n=13)	443 Points ∼2% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	441 Points ∼2% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	176 Points ∼1% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	2445 Points ∼46% +35%
Lenovo Tab P10	1814 Points ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	1802 Points ∼34% -1%
Chuwi HiPad	1785 Points ∼34% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1504 - 1901, n=13)	1782 Points ∼34% -2%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 4482, n=85)	1730 Points ∼33% -5%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	1714 Points ∼32% -6%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	1586 Points ∼30% -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Average of class Tablet (42 - 14283, n=85)	2364 Points ∼14% +242%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	1719 Points ∼10% +149%
Chuwi HiPad	921 Points ∼6% +33%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	890 Points ∼5% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (690 - 716, n=13)	701 Points ∼4% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	696 Points ∼4% +1%
Lenovo Tab P10	691 Points ∼4%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	100 Points ∼1% -86%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Average of class Tablet (53 - 9238, n=86)	1874 Points ∼17% +134%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	1840 Points ∼16% +130%
Chuwi HiPad	1032 Points ∼9% +29%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	996 Points ∼9% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (800 - 829, n=13)	812 Points ∼7% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	806 Points ∼7% +1%
Lenovo Tab P10	801 Points ∼7%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	126 Points ∼1% -84%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	14698 Points ∼15% +4%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 51436, n=177)	14491 Points ∼15% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (13596 - 15273, n=12)	14216 Points ∼15% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	14147 Points ∼15% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10	14108 Points ∼15%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	12893 Points ∼13% -9%
Chuwi HiPad	12462 Points ∼13% -12%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	11203 Points ∼12% -21%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	35210 Points ∼6% +184%
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 221941, n=177)	25792 Points ∼4% +108%
Chuwi HiPad	16016 Points ∼3% +29%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	15682 Points ∼2% +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (12281 - 12736, n=12)	12470 Points ∼2% +1%
Lenovo Tab P10	12400 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	12323 Points ∼2% -1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	10466 Points ∼2% -16%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	26875 Points ∼9% +111%
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 110846, n=178)	19070 Points ∼7% +50%
Chuwi HiPad	15061 Points ∼5% +18%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	14402 Points ∼5% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (12562 - 13203, n=12)	12801 Points ∼5% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10	12743 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	12686 Points ∼4% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	10923 Points ∼4% -14%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	96 fps ∼1% +357%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	39 fps ∼0% +86%
Chuwi HiPad	39 fps ∼0% +86%
Average of class Tablet (1 - 451, n=201)	38.3 fps ∼0% +82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (21 - 23, n=12)	21.8 fps ∼0% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	21 fps ∼0% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10	21 fps ∼0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	19 fps ∼0% -10%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	40 fps ∼1% +100%
Chuwi HiPad	34 fps ∼1% +70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (20 - 34, n=12)	27.8 fps ∼1% +39%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	25 fps ∼1% +25%
Average of class Tablet (1.1 - 120, n=205)	24 fps ∼1% +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	20 fps ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10	20 fps ∼1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	19 fps ∼1% -5%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	44 fps ∼5% +378%
Average of class Tablet (1.6 - 220, n=135)	26.2 fps ∼3% +185%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	19 fps ∼2% +107%
Chuwi HiPad	19 fps ∼2% +107%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (9.2 - 9.4, n=12)	9.3 fps ∼1% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	9.2 fps ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10	9.2 fps ∼1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	8.5 fps ∼1% -8%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	26 fps ∼7% +199%
Chuwi HiPad	19 fps ∼5% +118%
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 110, n=140)	17.7 fps ∼5% +103%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (8.7 - 18, n=12)	13.8 fps ∼4% +59%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	11 fps ∼3% +26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	8.8 fps ∼2% +1%
Lenovo Tab P10	8.7 fps ∼2%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	8.5 fps ∼2% -2%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 173, n=87)	23.3 fps ∼0% +288%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	18 fps ∼0% +200%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	13 fps ∼0% +117%
Chuwi HiPad	13 fps ∼0% +117%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (6 - 6.9, n=12)	6.15 fps ∼0% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	6.1 fps ∼0% +2%
Lenovo Tab P10	6 fps ∼0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	5.1 fps ∼0% -15%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 95, n=87)	15.2 fps ∼0% +167%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	15 fps ∼0% +163%
Chuwi HiPad	12 fps ∼0% +111%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (5.7 - 13, n=12)	9.81 fps ∼0% +72%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	6.2 fps ∼0% +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	5.7 fps ∼0% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10	5.7 fps ∼0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	5 fps ∼0% -12%

GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 49, n=37)	10.2 fps ∼6% +437%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1.9 - 3.8, n=5)	3.34 fps ∼2% +76%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	2.4 fps ∼2% +26%
Lenovo Tab P10	1.9 fps ∼1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	1.7 fps ∼1% -11%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (0.8 - 51.1, n=37)	9.71 fps ∼4% +783%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	2.5 fps ∼1% +127%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1.1 - 1.4, n=5)	1.18 fps ∼0% +7%
Lenovo Tab P10	1.1 fps ∼0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	1 fps ∼0% -9%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 58, n=37)	15.1 fps ∼7% +372%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.2 - 6.4, n=5)	5.6 fps ∼3% +75%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	3.8 fps ∼2% +19%
Lenovo Tab P10	3.2 fps ∼2%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	2.7 fps ∼1% -16%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 134, n=37)	26.5 fps ∼5% +679%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	7.2 fps ∼1% +112%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.3 - 3.6, n=5)	3.42 fps ∼1% +1%
Lenovo Tab P10	3.4 fps ∼1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	2.8 fps ∼0% -18%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	18 fps ∼4% +429%
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 107, n=63)	16.7 fps ∼4% +391%
Chuwi HiPad	7.3 fps ∼2% +115%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	7.2 fps ∼2% +112%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.3 - 3.6, n=12)	3.44 fps ∼1% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	3.4 fps ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10	3.4 fps ∼1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	3.1 fps ∼1% -9%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 47, n=63)	10.4 fps ∼4% +215%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	10 fps ∼4% +203%
Chuwi HiPad	7.4 fps ∼3% +124%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.3 - 7, n=12)	5.32 fps ∼2% +61%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	4 fps ∼2% +21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	3.3 fps ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10	3.3 fps ∼1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	2.9 fps ∼1% -12%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	147305 Points ∼50% +146%
Average of class Tablet (14200 - 227987, n=67)	69584 Points ∼24% +16%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	67359 Points ∼23% +12%
Lenovo Tab P10	59916 Points ∼20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (54731 - 60077, n=10)	57703 Points ∼20% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	55314 Points ∼19% -8%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (20856 - 566378, n=32)	160864 Points ∼28% +124%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	113687 Points ∼20% +58%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	110854 Points ∼20% +55%
Chuwi HiPad	107201 Points ∼19% +49%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	87335 Points ∼15% +22%
Lenovo Tab P10	71739 Points ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	70431 Points ∼12% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (56497 - 73468, n=11)	69869 Points ∼12% -3%

BaseMark OS II
Web
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	818 Points ∼38% +11%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	811 Points ∼37% +10%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	789 Points ∼36% +7%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 2034, n=126)	775 Points ∼36% +6%
Lenovo Tab P10	734 Points ∼34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (10 - 981, n=13)	660 Points ∼30% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	10 Points ∼0% -99%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (98 - 28853, n=127)	2408 Points ∼8% +153%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	1967 Points ∼7% +107%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	1602 Points ∼6% +68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (943 - 984, n=13)	962 Points ∼3% +1%
Lenovo Tab P10	951 Points ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	943 Points ∼3% -1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	844 Points ∼3% -11%
Memory
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	2654 Points ∼30% +211%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	1960 Points ∼22% +130%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 6751, n=127)	1313 Points ∼15% +54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (770 - 1522, n=13)	1037 Points ∼12% +22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	969 Points ∼11% +14%
Lenovo Tab P10	853 Points ∼10%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	849 Points ∼10% 0%
System
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	3318 Points ∼7% +16%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	3133 Points ∼6% +10%
Lenovo Tab P10	2861 Points ∼6%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	2838 Points ∼6% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (2560 - 2898, n=13)	2745 Points ∼6% -4%
Average of class Tablet (482 - 16467, n=127)	2719 Points ∼5% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	2561 Points ∼5% -10%
Overall
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	1769 Points ∼21% +55%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus	1446 Points ∼17% +27%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10	1435 Points ∼17% +26%
Average of class Tablet (150 - 8450, n=126)	1427 Points ∼17% +25%
Lenovo Tab P10	1142 Points ∼14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (389 - 1337, n=13)	1068 Points ∼13% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	389 Points ∼5% -66%

Legend

Lenovo Tab P10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Chuwi HiPad MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Chuwi Hi9 Plus MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei MediaPad T5 10 HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 HiSilicon Kirin 960s, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450

Average of class Tablet

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (10.9 - 376, n=112)	63 Points ∼100% +183%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)	36.127 Points ∼57% +62%
Chuwi HiPad (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)	30.911 Points ∼49% +39%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus (Google Chrome 70)	29.934 Points ∼48% +34%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67)	29.467 Points ∼47% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (22 - 22.7, n=12)	22.3 Points ∼35% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71)	22.275 Points ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)	22.084 Points ∼35% -1%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 58568, n=197)	8031 Points ∼100% +97%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)	6802 Points ∼85% +67%
Chuwi HiPad (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)	6046 Points ∼75% +48%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus (Chrome 70)	6017 Points ∼75% +48%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67)	5471 Points ∼68% +34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)	4078 Points ∼51% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71)	4075 Points ∼51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3470 - 4115, n=13)	3982 Points ∼50% -2%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)	11529.2 ms * ∼100% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (11012 - 11863, n=13)	11490 ms * ∼100% -1%
Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71)	11352 ms * ∼98%
Chuwi HiPad (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)	9850.9 ms * ∼85% +13%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67)	9293.1 ms * ∼81% +18%
Average of class Tablet (464 - 43092, n=209)	8792 ms * ∼76% +23%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus (Chrome 70)	7059 ms * ∼61% +38%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)	5947 ms * ∼52% +48%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)	116 Points ∼100% +13%
Average of class Tablet (36 - 386, n=78)	116 Points ∼100% +13%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67)	113 Points ∼97% +10%
Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71)	103 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)	99 Points ∼85% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (90 - 103, n=7)	97 Points ∼84% -6%

* ... smaller is better

	Lenovo Tab P10	Chuwi HiPad	Chuwi Hi9 Plus	Huawei MediaPad T5 10	Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N	Average 64 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-31%	-44%	66%	44%	-6%	10%	-38%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	60.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	66.81 10%	20.44 -66%	72.53 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 19%	73.84 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 21%	60.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	58.4 (11.2 - 74.7, n=140) -4%	50.7 (14 - 73.8, n=75) -17%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	84.28 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	65.93 -22%	21.16 -75%	83.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	85.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%	80.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -4%	77.3 (21.1 - 87.2, n=140) -8%	68.7 (17.6 - 87.7, n=75) -18%
Random Write 4KB	15.75	10.28 -35%	13.01 -17%	76.12 383%	60.8 286%	13.39 -15%	28.7 (3.4 - 147, n=159) 82%	11.9 (0.13 - 262, n=228) -24%
Random Read 4KB	53.9	40.21 -25%	42.2 -22%	76.67 42%	54.7 1%	71.13 32%	57.3 (11.4 - 149, n=159) 6%	26.2 (1.04 - 230, n=228) -51%
Sequential Write 256KB	205.74	73.55 -64%	132.47 -36%	83.84 -59%	126.8 -38%	103.32 -50%	177 (40 - 254, n=159) -14%	57.9 (2.04 - 732, n=228) -72%
Sequential Read 256KB	276.7	144.33 -48%	144.97 -48%	312.17 13%	247.8 -10%	285.63 3%	274 (95.6 - 704, n=159) -1%	152 (6.75 - 1789, n=228) -45%

PUBG Mobile

; Smooth; 0.10.0: Ø25.8 (19-32)

; Balanced; 0.10.0: Ø25.1 (16-27)

Arena of Valor

; min; 1.26.1.2: Ø29.1 (12-32)

; high HD; 1.26.1.2: Ø28.7 (1-31)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


35.1 °C	33 °C	31.1 °C
35.1 °C	30.5 °C	29.3 °C
32.8 °C	30.7 °C	28.2 °C

Máximo: 35.1 °C
Médio: 31.8 °C


28.2 °C	30.7 °C	32.8 °C
27.5 °C	28.5 °C	30.8 °C
27.5 °C	28.4 °C	28.8 °C

Máximo: 32.8 °C
Médio: 29.2 °C

alimentação elétrica 31.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 30.5 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 34.5 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22.2 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 30.5 °C / 87 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Lenovo Tab P10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.02 / 0.31 Watt
Ocioso	1.01 / 4.16 / 4.17 Watt
Carga	5.45 / 6.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Lenovo Tab P10 7000 mAh	Chuwi HiPad 7000 mAh	Chuwi Hi9 Plus 7000 mAh	Huawei MediaPad T5 10 5100 mAh	Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 7500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N 7300 mAh
Power Consumption		-68%	-63%	-104%	-57%	-5%
Idle Minimum *	1.01	2.7 -167%	2.18 -116%	2.33 -131%	2.01 -99%	1.26 -25%
Idle Average *	4.16	5.5 -32%	5.29 -27%	8.46 -103%	5.4 -30%	4.22 -1%
Idle Maximum *	4.17	5.6 -34%	5.37 -29%	8.49 -104%	5.44 -30%	4.29 -3%
Load Average *	5.45	7 -28%	8.56 -57%	11.14 -104%	8.55 -57%	5.48 -1%
Load Maximum *	6.9	12.2 -77%	12.86 -86%	12.3 -78%	11.53 -67%	6.57 5%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		21h 55min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		16h 32min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		15h 10min
Carga (máximo brilho)		4h 49min

	Lenovo Tab P10 7000 mAh	Lenovo Tablet 10-20L3000KGE 5070 mAh	Chuwi HiPad 7000 mAh	Chuwi Hi9 Plus 7000 mAh	Huawei MediaPad T5 10 5100 mAh	Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 7500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N 7300 mAh
Battery Runtime		-40%	-38%	-37%	13%	-22%	21%
Reader / Idle	1315			1241 -6%	3329 153%	1344 2%	1960 49%
H.264	910				580 -36%	702 -23%	963 6%
WiFi v1.3	992	593 -40%	616 -38%	634 -36%	525 -47%	648 -35%	938 -5%
Load	289			93 -68%	241 -17%	196 -32%	385 33%

Pro

+ Design elegante

+ Traseira de vidro

+ Leve

+ Quatro alto-falantes

+ Câmera com flash LED

+ 4 GB de RAM

+ Grande armazenamento interno pelo dinheiro

+ A funcionalidade da tela inteligente da Amazon Alexa com o novo Lenovo Smart Dock

+ Leitor de digitais

+ USB Tipo C

+ Conector para fones

+ Adequado para famílias e crianças

Contra

- Desempenho insuficiente

- Os alto-falantes não se ajustam quando o dispositivo é segurado no modo paisagem ou retrato

- Desempenho pobre em jogos

- Bloatware

- LTE opcional

- Sem suporte para exFAT

- Correções de segurança desatualizadas

O Lenovo Tab P10 é um tablet decente que tem uma pontuação geral que está no mesmo nível do Hi9Plus e do MediaPad T5 10 e está aquém do Galaxy Tab A. Não recomendamos o Tab P10 como um tablet para jogos, não é poderoso o suficiente para jogos com fome de desempenho. O tablet é adequado para jogos simples e tarefas gerais, como navegação na web, e-mails e assistir a vídeos.

O Lenovo Tab P10 é um tablet leve e elegante que está bem equipado, mas existem tablets mais potentes e com preços comparáveis no mercado.

O Tab P10 parece caro, graças à parte traseira do vidro e à estrutura metálica chanfrada, além de ter mais RAM e armazenamento interno do que os nossos dispositivos de comparação.

No entanto, recomendaríamos que espere até que a Lenovo liberte seu pacote Smart Dock, já que a empresa venderá o pacote pelo mesmo preço que atualmente vende o tablet. A Lenovo lançará primeiro o pacote para o Tab M10, após o qual começará a vender o pacote Tab P10. A empresa inicialmente venderá o pacote com 3 GB de RAM e 32 GB de versão de armazenamento, portanto, pode ser uma decisão mais sensata comprar a versão de maior capacidade se você não quiser a funcionalidade Amazon Alexa.

Lenovo Tab P10 - 2019-01-2101/21/2019 v6^(old)
Inge Schwabe

Acabamento

80%

Teclado

69 / 80 → 87%

Mouse

80%

Conectividade

45 / 65 → 68%

Peso

84 / 40-88 → 92%

Bateria

98%

Pantalha

82%

Desempenho do jogos

26 / 68 → 39%

Desempenho da aplicação

47 / 76 → 62%

Temperatura

92%

Ruído

100%

Audio

75 / 91 → 82%

Camera

44 / 85 → 52%

Médio

71%

83%

Tablet - Médio equilibrado

Breve Análise do Tablet Lenovo Tab P10

Os Top 10

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

PUBG Mobile

Arena of Valor

Lenovo Tab P10 audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N audio analysis

Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Pricecompare