Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Tablet Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 (i5-7Y54)

Steve Schardein (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 06/18/2017

Evolução, não revolução. A primeira geração do tablet Lenovo ThinkPad X1 foi boa, mas tinha sua porção de desvantagens. Um ano depois, a versão mais recente chega com um pouco mais que uma atualização do chipset com algumas atualizações de componentes. Será isso suficiente para permanecer competitivo?

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 (ThinkPad X1 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-7Y54
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 615, Análises do: 300 - 950 MHz, 21.20.16.4590
Memória
8192 MB 
, DDR3
Pantalha
12 polegadas 3:2, 2160 x 1440 pixel 216 PPI, 10-pontos multi-touch, LSN120QL01L01, IPS, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-Y Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 256 GB 
Placa de Som
Realtek High Definition Audio
Conexões
2 USB 3.0, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo audio, Card Reader: MicroSD
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac)
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9 x 293 x 210
Bateria
37 Wh, 4690 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: Frontal: 2.0 MP; Traseira: 8.0 MP
Primary Camera: 8 MPix
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0, laterais, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 12 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
1.08 kg

 

Bottom: Bottom cover release hatch, docking/keyboard cover port
Bottom: Bottom cover release hatch, docking/keyboard cover port
Top: Power button
Top: Power button
Left: Combo audio jack, volume rocker, speaker, Kensington Lock
Left: Combo audio jack, volume rocker, speaker, Kensington Lock
Right: USB Type-C 3.1 Gen 1, USB 3.0, speaker, mini-DisplayPort (Not shown: MicroSD card reader, beneath kickstand)
Right: USB Type-C 3.1 Gen 1, USB 3.0, speaker, mini-DisplayPort (Not shown: MicroSD card reader, beneath kickstand)
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
76.3 MB/s ∼100% +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
72.62 MB/s ∼95%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
64 MB/s ∼84% -12%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
93.77 MB/s ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
87.5 MB/s ∼93% -7%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
86.9 MB/s ∼93% -7%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
678 MBit/s ∼100% +16%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
613 MBit/s ∼90% +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
586 MBit/s ∼86%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
312 MBit/s ∼46% -47%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
514 MBit/s ∼100% +17%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
455 MBit/s ∼89% +3%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
446 MBit/s ∼87% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
440 MBit/s ∼86%
339.9
cd/m²
362.8
cd/m²
332.9
cd/m²
322.2
cd/m²
388.1
cd/m²
331.8
cd/m²
304.4
cd/m²
381.5
cd/m²
333.8
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Máximo: 388.1 cd/m² Médio: 344.2 cd/m² Minimum: 5.07 cd/m²
iluminação: 78 %
iluminação com acumulador: 388.1 cd/m²
Contraste: 995:1 (Preto: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.6 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 6.1 | - Ø
91% sRGB (Argyll) 59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.07
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
LSN120QL01L01, IPS, 12, 2160 x 1440
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
INT3470, IPS, 12, 2160x1440
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
BOE06DC, IPS, 12.3, 1920x1280
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
CMN1374, IPS, 13.3, 1920x1080
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Samsung SDC3853, IPS, 12.3, 2736x1824
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
LEN4140, OLED, 14, 2560x1440
Response Times
8%
-30%
-57%
-58%
61%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
28.4 (15.2, 13.2)
28.4 (11.2, 17.2)
-0%
42.4 (20.4, 22)
-49%
55.2 (21.2, 34)
-94%
46 (17.2, 28.8)
-62%
3.6 (1.6, 2)
87%
Response Time Black / White *
22.8 (13.6, 9.2)
17.6 (3.6, 14)
23%
30.8 (18, 12.8)
-35%
27.2 (7.6, 19.6)
-19%
31 (6, 25.2)
-36%
3.2 (2, 1.2)
86%
PWM Frequency
221.2 (49)
222.2 (49)
0%
210.1
-5%
50 (50)
-77%
240.4 (80)
9%
Screen
-19%
15%
0%
23%
12%
Brightness
344
315
-8%
522
52%
256
-26%
392
14%
240
-30%
Brightness Distribution
78
85
9%
88
13%
83
6%
92
18%
95
22%
Black Level *
0.39
0.744
-91%
0.42
-8%
0.25
36%
0.27
31%
Contrast
995
460
-54%
1246
25%
1048
5%
1441
45%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.6
5.33
-16%
4
13%
5.13
-12%
3.61
22%
5.3
-15%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.1
5.36
12%
5.5
10%
6.23
-2%
3.8
38%
3.7
39%
Gamma
2.07 116%
2.12 113%
2.16 111%
2.45 98%
2.16 111%
1.78 135%
CCT
7104 91%
7671 85%
7546 86%
6413 101%
5969 109%
6202 105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
57
-3%
64.86
10%
57.84
-2%
63
7%
84.8
44%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91
93
2%
93.97
3%
88.57
-3%
97
7%
100
10%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-6% / -11%
-8% / 3%
-29% / -11%
-18% / 1%
37% / 28%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.6 ms rise
↘ 9.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
28.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.2 ms rise
↘ 13.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 221.2 Hz49 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 221.2 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 49 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 221.2 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6272 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Memory
CPU-Z Memory
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
ComputeMark
ComputeMark
JetStream
JetStream
LatencyMon
LatencyMon
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
Intel Core i7-7600U
160 Points ∼82% +39%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7600U
152 Points ∼78% +32%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Intel Core i5-7300U
144 Points ∼74% +25%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
Intel Core m7-6Y75
119 Points ∼61% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Core i5-7Y54
115 Points ∼59%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
88 Points ∼45% -23%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
Intel Core i7-7600U
373 Points ∼17% +59%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Intel Core i5-7300U
346 Points ∼16% +48%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7600U
329 Points ∼15% +41%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
Intel Core m7-6Y75
234 Points ∼11% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Core i5-7Y54
234 Points ∼11%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
206 Points ∼10% -12%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
Intel Core i7-7600U
1.85 Points ∼84% +40%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7600U
1.76 Points ∼80% +33%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Intel Core i5-7300U
1.64 Points ∼74% +24%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Core i5-7Y54
1.32 Points ∼60%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
Intel Core m7-6Y75
1.08 Points ∼49% -18%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
0.98 Points ∼44% -26%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
Intel Core i7-7600U
4.08 Points ∼17% +59%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7600U
3.62 Points ∼15% +41%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Intel Core i5-7300U
3.57 Points ∼15% +39%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
Intel Core m7-6Y75
2.62 Points ∼11% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Core i5-7Y54
2.57 Points ∼11%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
2.27 Points ∼10% -12%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
787.585 s * ∼9% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Core i5-7Y54
761.49 s * ∼9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
Intel Core m7-6Y75
698 s * ∼8% +8%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7600U
545.624 s * ∼6% +28%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
898 Seconds * ∼4% -34%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7600U
688.22 Seconds * ∼3% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Core i5-7Y54
669 Seconds * ∼3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
Intel Core m7-6Y75
640 Seconds * ∼3% +4%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.32 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
2.57 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
27.76 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
115 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
234 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
36.14 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
Ajuda
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
4852 Points ∼74% +13%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006
4803 Points ∼74% +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4288 Points ∼66%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
4058 Points ∼62% -5%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3510 Points ∼54% -18%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
3186 Points ∼49% -26%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
5051 Points ∼54% +29%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006
4781 Points ∼51% +22%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4602 Points ∼49% +17%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3924 Points ∼42%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
3583 Points ∼38% -9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
2968 Points ∼32% -24%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4741 Points ∼79% +53%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
3860 Points ∼65% +25%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006
3774 Points ∼63% +22%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3092 Points ∼52%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
2976 Points ∼50% -4%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
2426 Points ∼41% -22%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3092 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3924 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4288 pontos
Ajuda
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-42%
-5%
-42%
-52%
58%
Write 4k QD32
259
215.5
-17%
434.5
68%
225.2
-13%
149.2
-42%
506.6
96%
Read 4k QD32
247.9
325.6
31%
493.3
99%
311.3
26%
243.7
-2%
631.7
155%
Write 4k
120
73.58
-39%
72.22
-40%
56.48
-53%
68.02
-43%
182.2
52%
Read 4k
52.34
32.36
-38%
31.75
-39%
29.43
-44%
30.14
-42%
58.23
11%
Write 512
869
297.8
-66%
589.3
-32%
372.5
-57%
158.2
-82%
1292
49%
Read 512
697.5
324.6
-53%
406
-42%
312.3
-55%
313.1
-55%
1040
49%
Write Seq
1259
305.6
-76%
865.2
-31%
443.6
-65%
158.2
-87%
1693
34%
Read Seq
1739
420.3
-76%
1294
-26%
467.1
-73%
662.5
-62%
2004
15%
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Velocidade de Transferência Mínima: 1219.1 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Máxima: 1371 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Média: 1332 MB/s
Tempo de Acesso: 0.1 ms
Índice de Explosão: 174.8 MB/s
Uso da CPU: 7.8 %
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
1566 Points ∼10% +40%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
1490 Points ∼9% +33%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30
1370 Points ∼9% +22%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7300U
1347 Points ∼8% +20%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75
1179 Points ∼7% +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel HD Graphics 615, 7Y54
1121 Points ∼7%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
1633 Points ∼3% +41%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
1589 Points ∼3% +37%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7300U
1476 Points ∼3% +27%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30
1206 Points ∼2% +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel HD Graphics 615, 7Y54
1161 Points ∼2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75
1154 Points ∼2% -1%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
1084 Points ∼3% +49%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
1000 Points ∼2% +37%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7300U
972 Points ∼2% +34%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30
810 Points ∼2% +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75
762 Points ∼2% +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel HD Graphics 615, 7Y54
728 Points ∼2%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
8850 Points ∼5% +44%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7300U
8220 Points ∼5% +33%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
8075 Points ∼5% +31%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30
6597 Points ∼4% +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel HD Graphics 615, 7Y54
6164 Points ∼4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75
5769 Points ∼4% -6%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7300U
44238 Points ∼6%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
41229 Points ∼6%
3DMark 06 Standard
6873 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
1274 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
44515 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
4509 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
678 pontos
Ajuda
BioShock Infinite
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
6 fps ∼3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
6 fps ∼3% 0%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
9 fps ∼4% +50%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006
7.8 fps ∼4% +30%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
8.2 fps ∼4% +37%
1366x768 High Preset (sort by value)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
19 fps ∼6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
20 fps ∼7% +5%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
28.6 fps ∼9% +51%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006
24.9 fps ∼8% +31%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
22.66 fps ∼7% +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
26.3 fps ∼9% +38%
1366x768 Medium Preset (sort by value)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
21 fps ∼7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
25 fps ∼8% +19%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
32.8 fps ∼10% +56%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006
30.7 fps ∼10% +46%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
26.93 fps ∼8% +28%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
31 fps ∼10% +48%
1280x720 Very Low Preset (sort by value)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
42 fps ∼12%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
44 fps ∼12% +5%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
56.5 fps ∼16% +35%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006
54.4 fps ∼15% +30%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
52.42 fps ∼15% +25%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
54.7 fps ∼15% +30%
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 4221196fps
Carga Máxima
 30 °C32.8 °C34.8 °C 
 31.8 °C37 °C39.6 °C 
 34.8 °C47.2 °C45.6 °C 
Máximo: 47.2 °C
Médio: 37.1 °C
37 °C35.2 °C33 °C
40.4 °C38.8 °C34.2 °C
49.8 °C45 °C36.6 °C
Máximo: 49.8 °C
Médio: 38.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  35 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203839.438253836.9383136.535.736.5403435.1345035.333.935.3633333.1338030.530.530.510030.931.330.912530.529.430.516029.429.729.420033.52833.525040.127.440.131542.926.942.940046.226.346.250050.625.850.663056.725.156.780061.524.961.5100061.524.461.5125063.224.263.2160066.524.166.5200066.423.766.4250064.823.664.8315057.323.557.3400060.923.460.9500061.423.461.4630052.123.452.1800046.823.346.81000048.923.448.91250047.923.347.91600039.323.439.3SPL7436.274N28.92.728.9median 50.6Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2median 24.2median 50.6Delta10.91.610.93641.837.137.74535.835.347.750.746.655.659.5596056.562.668.973.870.277.375.873.478.27774.672.169.767.8626086.363.8median 67.8HP EliteBook x360 1030 G28.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.02 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(-) | highs are not linear (16.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (38.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 23%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.3 / 2.6 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 5 / 6.3 / 7.8 Watt
Carga midlight 19.5 / 19.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 2160 x 1440, 12
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
6Y75, HD Graphics 515, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP, IPS, 2160x1440, 12
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.3
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
7300U, HD Graphics 620, Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), OLED, 2560x1440, 14
Power Consumption
-4%
-23%
-19%
-61%
Idle Minimum *
5
5.87
-17%
2.85
43%
3.2
36%
4.9
2%
Idle Average *
6.3
6.05
4%
6.76
-7%
5.5
13%
7.6
-21%
Idle Maximum *
7.8
6.13
21%
6.91
11%
6.5
17%
13.8
-77%
Load Average *
19.5
21.27
-9%
32.88
-69%
29.7
-52%
33.4
-71%
Load Maximum *
19.6
23.03
-18%
37.41
-91%
41.3
-111%
46.5
-137%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
11h 02min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
7h 21min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 14min
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 37 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
6Y75, HD Graphics 515, 37 Wh
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
7600U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2
7300U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 38 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00
7600U, HD Graphics 620, 56 Wh
Battery Runtime
-16%
17%
78%
11%
-3%
Reader / Idle
662
628
-5%
1075
62%
1387
110%
791
19%
784
18%
WiFi v1.3
441
300
-32%
486
10%
630
43%
488
11%
368
-17%
Load
134
118
-12%
105
-22%
244
82%
138
3%
120
-10%

Pro

+ Manutenção relativamente fácil para um tablet/conversível
+ Muito bons dispositivos de entrada
+ Rápido desempenho do sistema
+ Temperaturas de operação razoáveis
+ Duração da bateria aceitável
+ Brilho e contraste bastante melhorado

Contra

- Queda do desempenho contínuo ainda presente, devido ao chipset resfriado passivamente
- O PWM de baixa frequência da tela provavelmente perturbará os usuários sensíveis
- Sem porta de Thunderbolt
- Alto falantes ruins
- Garantia padrão de apenas 1 ano
In review: ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2. Test model provided by Lenovo US
In review: ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2. Test model provided by Lenovo US

Embora seja verdade que que o tablet ThinkPad X1 (“Gen 2”) deste ano seja mais que apenas uma atualização de chipset, as vantagens conferidas por essa atualização no que diz respeito ao seu desempenho total em nossos testes hoje foram mínimas. Por exemplo, três das maiores reclamações que tivemos sobre o predecessor de 2016, equipado com m7 — desempenho contínuo da CPU/GPU, temperaturas, e durações da bateria — foram parcialmente abordadas na unidade de teste atual. Sim, o desempenho contínuo do SoC ainda está abaixo de suas capacidades de explosão de prazo curto, mas não é por muito: medimos uma queda de apenas 12% em nosso teste Cinebench realista (como foi detalhado na seção do Processador da análise atual), que não está nada mal considerando a ausência de uma ventoinha ativa. Enquanto isso, as temperaturas da superfície e a duração da bateria agora são aceitáveis ou inclusive boas, dependendo de como planeja usar o aparelho. Além disso, o painel da tela também teve algumas melhorias razoáveis, mais notáveis na área do brilho e contraste (que foram nossos maiores pontos de crítica do ano passado).

Sem importar isso, no entanto, é compreensível por que algumas pessoas ficaram decepcionadas pela falta de revisões no design da carcaça, seleção de portas, e qualidade dos alto falantes. Os concorrentes estão aumentando em número - e com os recém-chegados, como o 2-em-1 Dell Latitude 12 5285, a complacência do X1 pode muito bem contribuir para sua destruição. Além disso, os conversíveis convencionais estão cada vez mais portáteis, diminuindo a vantagem que do design do teclado desmontável dos tablets tem mantido durante muito tempo na área do tamanho e peso.

Um ano se passou, mas o Tablet ThinkPad X1 Gen 2 só fez melhorias marginais em relação ao seu antecessor. Independentemente disso, no entanto, continua sendo uma das poucas opções que combina os benefícios de uma máquina empresarial de gama alta com a versatilidade de um tablet.

No entanto, por enquanto, a diferença de preços e a falta geral de outras opções ainda oferecem ao X1 o luxo da exclusividade. Para os usuários empresariais que sempre estão em movimento, é uma das poucas opções que combina tanto a capacidade de manutenção, a durabilidade e o gerenciamento fácil de uma máquina empresarial de ponta com a versatilidade de um tablet com base de teclado desmontável. Para o usuário certo e para o propósito correto, apesar da sua estratégia evolutiva e inexperiente, ainda faz sentido.

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 - 06/15/2017 v6
Steve Schardein

Acabamento
80 / 98 → 82%
Teclado
85%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
51 / 80 → 64%
Peso
74 / 78 → 91%
Bateria
90%
Pantalha
83%
Desempenho do jogos
57 / 68 → 84%
Desempenho da aplicação
79 / 87 → 91%
Temperatura
86%
Ruído
100%
Audio
50 / 91 → 55%
Camera
67 / 85 → 79%
Médio
76%
86%
Convertible - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Tablet Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 (i5-7Y54)
Steve Schardein, 2017-06-18 (Update: 2017-06-22)