Breve Análise do Ultrabook Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2016 (Core i7, WQHD)

Name: Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE
Brand: Lenovo

Mais fino, impossível. A terceira geração do ThinkPad X1 Carbon já pertencia aos portáteis mais finos e leves de 14 polegadas do mercado. Na quarta geração, a Lenovo melhora e reduz o peso para abaixo de 1,2 kg. Nos verificamos como isto afeta as temperaturas, ruído do sistema, e desempenho.

Till Schönborn, ✓ Tanja Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 04/13/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Business Laptop / Notebook Skylake Ultrabook Windows

Test device courtesy of notebooksandmore.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE (ThinkPad X1 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-6500U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Skylake

Placa gráfica

Intel HD Graphics 520, Análises do: 1050 MHz, Memoría: 933 MHz, 20.19.15.4352

Memória

8 GB

, LPDDR3-1866, fixa, sem slots

Pantalha

14.00 polegadas 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 210 PPI, VVX14T058J00, Painel IPS, Iluminação de fundo de LED, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH

Disco rígido

Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP, 256 GB

, M.2, 198 GB livre

Placa de Som

Intel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Conexões

3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm headset, Card Reader: MicroSD, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais

Funcionamento em rede

Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, Sierra Wireless EM7455 (LTE Cat. 6), LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 16.5 x 333 x 229

Bateria

52 Wh Lítio-Polímero, integrado

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p foco fixo

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo (2x 1W), Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Adaptador de força de 65 Watts, Lenovo ThinkVantage Tools, Lenovo PowerEngage, Lenovo PC Experience, Lenovo Companion, 36 Meses Garantia

peso

1.197 kg, Suprimento de energia: 346 g

Preço

2000 Euro

Links

Lenovo página inicial
Lenovo Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Lenovo ThinkPad T460p HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE DIN A4 ❌

left: power adapter, OneLink+, Mini DisplayPort, USB 3.0

rear: fan control, microSD slot, SIM slot

right: headset jack, 2x USB 3.0, HDMI, Kensington Lock


259 cd/m²	270 cd/m²	270 cd/m²
270 cd/m²	272 cd/m²	268 cd/m²
270 cd/m²	264 cd/m²	265 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

VVX14T058J00 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 272 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 267.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3 cd/m²
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 273 cd/m²
Contraste: 850:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.61 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.31 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
95% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE 2.560 x 1.440 IPS-Panel	Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE 2.560 x 1.440 IPS-Panel	Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 2.560 x 1.440 IPS-Panel	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 2.560 x 1.440 IPS-Panel	HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 2.560 x 1.440 IPS-Panel
Display		3%	1%	-20%	2%
Display P3 Coverage	66.7	68.7 3%	67.2 1%	52.4 -21%	67.9 2%
sRGB Coverage	94.7	98.1 4%	95.9 1%	77.4 -18%	96.8 2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	68.4	70.4 3%	69.3 1%	54 -21%	70 2%
Response Times		-1%	-11%		-8%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	44 ?(17, 27)	35.6 ?(17.2, 18.4) 19%	48 ?(15, 33) -9%		46.4 ?(16.4, 30) -5%
Response Time Black / White *	24 ?(5.2, 18.8)	29.2 ?(14.4, 14.8) -22%	27 ?(7, 20) -13%		26.4 ?(6.8, 19.6) -10%
PWM Frequency	220 ?(90)	220 ?(90) 0%
Screen		-19%	9%	-17%	-9%
Brightness middle	272	257 -6%	380 40%	252.3 -7%	327 20%
Brightness	268	248 -7%	354 32%	246 -8%	316 18%
Brightness Distribution	95	94 -1%	81 -15%	95 0%	87 -8%
Black Level *	0.32	0.26 19%	0.26 19%	0.426 -33%	0.35 -9%
Contrast	850	988 16%	1462 72%	592 -30%	934 10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.61	4.59 -76%	3.11 -19%	3.8 -46%	4.39 -68%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.43	9.72 -51%	6.73 -5%		7.27 -13%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.31	6.38 -93%	4.35 -31%	2.92 12%	4.69 -42%
Gamma	2.35 ^94%	2.51 ^88%	2.37 ^93%	2.08 ^106%	2.15 ^102%
CCT	6360 ^102%	6238 ^104%	6771 ^96%	6070 ^107%	7101 ^92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	63	65 3%	62 -2%	50.41 -20%	62.52 -1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	95	98 3%	96 1%		96.71 2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-6% / -12%	-0% / 5%	-19% / -17%	-5% / -7%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.2 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 17 ms rise
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

220 Hz

≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 220 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 220 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | X264 HD Benchmark 4.0

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 Intel Core i7-6600U	142 Points +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Intel Core i7-6600U	141 Points +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE Intel Core i7-6500U	128 Points
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 Intel Core i5-6300U	124 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 Intel Core i7-5500U	123 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE Intel Core i5-6200U	116 Points -9%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Intel Core i7-6600U	347 Points +12%
Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 Intel Core i7-6600U	334 Points +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE Intel Core i7-6500U	310 Points
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 Intel Core i5-6300U	303 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE Intel Core i5-6200U	288 Points -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 Intel Core i7-5500U	260 Points -16%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 Intel Core i7-6600U	1.61 Points +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Intel Core i7-6600U	1.57 Points +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE Intel Core i7-6500U	1.47 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 Intel Core i7-5500U	1.42 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE Intel Core i5-6200U	1.31 Points -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Intel Core i7-6600U	3.83 Points +11%
Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 Intel Core i7-6600U	3.58 Points +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE Intel Core i7-6500U	3.46 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE Intel Core i5-6200U	3.18 Points -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 Intel Core i7-5500U	2.83 Points -18%

X264 HD Benchmark 4.0
Pass 1
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Intel Core i7-6600U	120.4 fps +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE Intel Core i7-6500U	108.6 fps
Pass 2
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Intel Core i7-6600U	22.62 fps +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE Intel Core i7-6500U	20.31 fps

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

8354

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

10958

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

4882

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

3.46 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

37.42 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.47 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

128 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

310 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

43.68 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Ajuda

... comparado com

	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512)	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 Samsung SSD SM951 512 GB MZHPV512HDGL	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP	HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
AS SSD		166%	105%	-4%	190%
Seq Read	499.1	2039 309%	1339 168%	512 3%	1839 268%
Seq Write	294	1407 379%	1209 311%	235.7 -20%	1190 305%
4K Read	30.43	45.41 49%	39.9 31%	32.41 7%	47.72 57%
4K Write	74.6	114.4 53%	91.3 22%	89.9 21%	126.6 70%
4K-64 Read	370.4	968 161%	510 38%	355 -4%	1858 402%
4K-64 Write	253.4	366 44%	402.2 59%	170.3 -33%	344.3 36%

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP

Velocidade de Transferência Mínima: 88.1 MB/s

Velocidade de Transferência Máxima: 411.3 MB/s

Velocidade de Transferência Média: 352.5 MB/s

Tempo de Acesso: 0.1 ms

Índice de Explosão: 155.7 MB/s

Uso da CPU: 1.8 %

PCMark 8 | PCMark 7

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Intel Core i7-6600U, Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512)	3542 Points +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE Intel Core i7-6500U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	3385 Points
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 Intel Core i5-6300U, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	3305 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 Intel Core i7-5500U, Samsung SSD SM951 512 GB MZHPV512HDGL	2970 Points -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 Intel Core i5-5300U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP	2778 Points -18%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Intel Core i7-6600U, Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512)	4338 Points +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE Intel Core i7-6500U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	4150 Points
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 Intel Core i5-6300U, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	4058 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 Intel Core i5-5300U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP	3417 Points -18%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Intel Core i7-6600U, Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512)	4442 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE Intel Core i7-6500U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	4342 Points
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 Intel Core i5-6300U, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	4241 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 Intel Core i5-5300U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP	3614 Points -17%

PCMark 7 - Score
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE Intel Core i7-6500U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP	5350 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 Intel Core i7-5500U, Samsung SSD SM951 512 GB MZHPV512HDGL	5342 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Intel Core i7-6600U, Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512)	5190 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 Intel Core i5-5300U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP	4943 Points -8%

PCMark 7 Score		5350 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3385 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		4150 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4342 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 Intel Core i7-6650U, Intel Iris Graphics 540	2450 Points +77%
Lenovo ThinkPad T450s-20BWS1UT00 Intel Core i5-5200U, NVIDIA GeForce 940M	2313 Points +67%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Intel Core i7-6600U, Intel HD Graphics 520	1416 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE Intel Core i7-6500U, Intel HD Graphics 520	1386 Points
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 Intel Core i5-6300U, Intel HD Graphics 520	1377 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE Intel Core i5-6200U, Intel HD Graphics 520	1156 Points -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 Intel Core i7-5500U, Intel HD Graphics 5500	968 Points -30%

3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad T450s-20BWS1UT00 Intel Core i5-5200U, NVIDIA GeForce 940M	1627 Points +70%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 Intel Core i7-6650U, Intel Iris Graphics 540	1477 Points +54%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE Intel Core i7-6500U, Intel HD Graphics 520	959 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Intel Core i7-6600U, Intel HD Graphics 520	935 Points -3%
HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 Intel Core i5-6300U, Intel HD Graphics 520	900 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 Intel Core i7-5500U, Intel HD Graphics 5500	712 Points -26%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE Intel Core i5-6200U, Intel HD Graphics 520	597 Points -38%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		9532 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		1553 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		52800 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		5978 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		892 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	51	28.3	23.8	6.9
Battlefield 4 (2013)	42	29.9	19	5.9
Dirt Rally (2015)	101.4	26.7	13

	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE Intel Core i7-6500U, Intel HD Graphics 520	HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 Intel Core i5-6300U, Intel HD Graphics 520	Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 Intel Core i7-6600U, Intel HD Graphics 520	Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Intel Core i7-6600U, Intel HD Graphics 520	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 Intel Core i5-5300U, Intel HD Graphics 5500
Noise		2%	-0%	1%	4%
off / environment *	29.1	29.1 -0%	31.2 -7%	29.2 -0%
Idle Minimum *	29.1	29.1 -0%	31.2 -7%	29.2 -0%	28.5 2%
Idle Average *	29.1	29.1 -0%	31.2 -7%	29.2 -0%	28.6 2%
Idle Maximum *	29.1	29.1 -0%	31.2 -7%	29.2 -0%	28.8 1%
Load Average *	35.6	32.6 8%	31.9 10%	33.7 5%	30.7 14%
Load Maximum *	38.1	37.8 1%	31.9 16%	38.5 -1%	36.9 3%

* ... smaller is better

Barulho

Ocioso		29.1 / 29.1 / 29.1 dB
Carga		35.6 / 38.1 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: ECM8000 + Voltcraft SL-451 (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.1 dB(A)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


30.8 °C	43.2 °C	30.3 °C
28.9 °C	33.8 °C	28.3 °C
26.6 °C	26.6 °C	26.4 °C

Máximo: 43.2 °C
Médio: 30.5 °C


29.6 °C	45 °C	31.5 °C
28.2 °C	36.4 °C	30 °C
27 °C	28.5 °C	28.3 °C

Máximo: 45 °C
Médio: 31.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 39.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.1 °C | Fluke 62 Max

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.6 °C / 79.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+1.1 °C / 2 F).

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.23 / 0.38 Watt
Ocioso	3.8 / 7.1 / 7.7 Watt
Carga	30.2 / 44.7 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE 52 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE 49 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2015 50 Wh	HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 45.6 Wh	Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 55 Wh
Battery Runtime		-25%	-2%	-23%	-11%
Reader / Idle	942	833 -12%	984 4%	530 -44%
H.264	510	397 -22%		339 -34%
WiFi v1.3	429	340 -21%	285 -34%	309 -28%	346 -19%
Load	115	62 -46%	141 23%	131 14%	112 -3%
WiFi			401

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		15h 42min
WiFi Websurfing		7h 9min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		8h 30min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 55min

Pro

+ Carcaça ultra leve e fina

+ Excelentes dispositivos de entrada

+ Conexões sem fio velozes

+ Tela de alta resolução e com ângulos de visão estáveis

+ Alto desempenho do sistema

+ Baixo ruído do sistema e baixa temperatura

+ Boa duração da bateria

+ 3 anos de garantia

Contra

- Dobradiças da tela um pouco balançantes

- LAN apenas via adaptador

- Sem USB Tipo C

- Quase nenhuma opção de atualização

- Preço muito alto

In review: Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon. Test model provided by Notebooksandmore

E460, L460, T460, T460p, T460s, e agora o X1 Carbon: Parece que a Lenovo deseja preencher até o menor nicho com um modelo ThinkPad. Nós não queremos julgar aqui se isto é realmente necessário ou razoável - mas ajuda a encontrar o melhor aparelho para cada propósito.

Especialmente sua grande mobilidade é um forte argumento para o X1 Carbon.

Com um peso agressivo de nem sequer 1,2 kg, você pode levar o ThinkPad em suas viagens de negócios e ele dura facilmente todo um dia sem o adaptador de força. Apesar do design fino, o usuário dificilmente precisa se preocupar sobre limitações no desempenho, conectividade ou emissões. Além de tudo isso, a Lenovo incorporou um painel WQHD muito atraente, com ótimas cores e contrastes, que poderiam ter sido, no máximo, um pouco mais brilhante.

No entanto, existem bons motivos para preferir o T460s sobre o X1 Carbon. Em compensação por sua carcaça um pouco maior, você obterá um teclado ainda melhor, atualização adicional e opções de conectividade (porta LAN nativa, SmartCard, leitor SD) bem como reservas de desempenho maiores, graças a um TDP aumentado. Além disso, o preço do T460s é mais atraente, porém, ainda muito alto. Em resumo, recomendaríamos a série T - no entanto, esta decisão pode variar dependendo do usuário.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 20FB003RGE - 2016-04-18 04/18/2016 v5.1^(old)
Till Schönborn

Acabamento

86 / 98 → 87%

Teclado

92%

Mouse

91%

Conectividade

67 / 80 → 84%

Peso

73 / 20-67 → 100%

Bateria

90%

Pantalha

90%

Desempenho do jogos

56 / 68 → 83%

Desempenho da aplicação

85 / 92 → 93%

Temperatura

91%

Ruído

94%

Audio

63%

Camera

53 / 85 → 62%

Médio

79%

89%

Office - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Ultrabook Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2016 (Core i7, WQHD)

Till Schönborn, 2016-04-13 (Update: 2016-04-19)