Breve Análise do Portátil Alienware 17 R5 (i7-8750H, GTX 1070, QHD)

Name: Alienware 17 R5
Brand: Alienware

Agora com uma CPU hexa-core. Apesar de usar os componentes mais atuais, a antiga marca líder de games Alienware vem enfrentando cada vez mais dificuldades para competir com os concorrentes. Descubra em nossa análise por que esse esforço não é mais suficiente para ser um vencedor.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 09/11/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook

Test device courtesy of cyberport.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Alienware 17 R5 (17 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1480 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 389.12

Memória

16 GB

, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2400, dual channel, todos os slots ocupados, máx. 32 GB

Pantalha

17.30 polegadas 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 170 PPI, JYWWF_B173QTN (AUO1496), TN, QHD, 120 Hz, G-Sync, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel CM246

Disco rígido

SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG, 256 GB

, NVMe-SSD + HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1 TB HDD, 7200 rpm. Slots: 2x M.2 Type 2280 & 1x 2.5 inch

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC298 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH

Conexões

3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: 1x fones, 1x microfone, 1x Noble Lock, 1x Graphics Amplifier Port

Funcionamento em rede

Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 30 x 424 x 332

Bateria

99 Wh Lítio-Ion, 6 células

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: FHD

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 2.1, Teclado: RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 240 Watts, Guia de início rápido, panfletos de informação adicional, Diversas ferramentas do fabricante, Killer Performance Suite, McAfee Security avaliação, Tobii Eye Tracking, 12 Meses Garantia

peso

4.416 kg, Suprimento de energia: 798 g

Preço

2400 EUR

Links

Alienware página inicial
Alienware Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 Alienware 17 R5 Alienware 17 R4 MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB DIN A4 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average of class Gaming (885 - 1412, n=3, last 2 years)	1169 MBit/s +111%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi	691 MBit/s +25%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB Intel Wireless-AC 9560	662 MBit/s +20%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter	630 MBit/s +14%
Alienware 17 R4 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter	589 MBit/s +7%
Alienware 17 R5 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter	553 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Gaming (881 - 1700, n=3, last 2 years)	1327 MBit/s +99%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB Intel Wireless-AC 9560	693 MBit/s +4%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi	671 MBit/s 0%
Alienware 17 R5 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter	668 MBit/s
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter	644 MBit/s -4%
Alienware 17 R4 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter	606 MBit/s -9%


372 cd/m²	392 cd/m²	356 cd/m²
387 cd/m²	398 cd/m²	361 cd/m²
354 cd/m²	344 cd/m²	341 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

JYWWF_B173QTN (AUO1496) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 398 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 367.2 cd/m² Minimum: 18 cd/m²
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 398 cd/m²
Contraste: 780:1 (Preto: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.45 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2.56
ΔE Greyscale 5.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
86% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.4

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Alienware 17 R5 JYWWF_B173QTN (AUO1496), TN, 2560x1440	Alienware 17 R4 TN LED, 2560x1440	Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY AUO_B173HAN03, IPS, 1920x1080	MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB Chi Mei N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN WLED, 1920x1080	HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 AU Optronics AUO309D, IPS, 1920x1080
Display		-4%	4%	32%	4%
Display P3 Coverage	63.4	61.2 -3%	64.4 2%	90.8 43%	65.4 3%
sRGB Coverage	86.1	82.9 -4%	91.3 6%	99.9 16%	90 5%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	62.9	60.5 -4%	65.6 4%	85.8 36%	65.8 5%
Response Times		-79%	-9%	-81%	-26%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	20.8 ?(11.6, 9.2)	30 ?(18.8, 11.2) -44%	14 ?(7, 7) 33%	28 ?(16.4, 11.6) -35%	17.6 ?(10, 7.6) 15%
Response Time Black / White *	6 ?(4, 2)	12.8 ?(10.8, 2) -113%	9 ?(5, 4) -50%	13.6 ?(11.8, 1.8) -127%	10 ?(4.8, 5.2) -67%
PWM Frequency				25000 ?(14)
Screen		-3%	-5%	20%	11%
Brightness middle	398	402.3 1%	335 -16%	273 -31%	343.6 -14%
Brightness	367	372 1%	300 -18%	273 -26%	320 -13%
Brightness Distribution	86	86 0%	82 -5%	90 5%	87 1%
Black Level *	0.51	0.62 -22%	0.7 -37%	0.26 49%	0.34 33%
Contrast	780	649 -17%	479 -39%	1050 35%	1011 30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.45	5.6 -3%	4.99 8%	3.52 35%	3.74 31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.36	9.8 5%	9.32 10%	6.34 39%	5.33 49%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.56		1.93 25%	2.09 18%	3.49 -36%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.4	4.7 13%	5.2 4%	3.11 42%	3.7 31%
Gamma	2.4 ^92%	2.14 ^103%	2.49 ^88%	2.43 ^91%	2.36 ^93%
CCT	7453 ^87%	7519 ^86%	7719 ^84%	6999 ^93%	6388 ^102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	56	53.7 -4%	59 5%	76 36%	58 4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	86	82.2 -4%	91 6%	100 16%	90 5%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-29% / -13%	-3% / -4%	-10% / 9%	-4% / 5%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4 ms rise
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11.6 ms rise
20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 9.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17908 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.93 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

11.25 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

170 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

993 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=233, last 2 years)	269 Points +58%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB Intel Core i7-8750H	174 Points +2%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY Intel Core i7-8750H	173 Points +2%
Alienware 17 R4 Intel Core i7-7820HK	171 Points +1%
Alienware 17 R5 Intel Core i7-8750H	170 Points
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 Intel Core i7-8750H	165 Points -3%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=234, last 2 years)	3111 Points +213%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB Intel Core i7-8750H	1163 Points +17%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 Intel Core i7-8750H	1047 Points +5%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY Intel Core i7-8750H	1007 Points +1%
Alienware 17 R5 Intel Core i7-8750H	993 Points
Alienware 17 R4 Intel Core i7-7820HK	867 Points -13%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (2.62 - 3.73, n=24, last 2 years)	3.23 Points +67%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 Intel Core i7-8750H	1.99 Points +3%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB Intel Core i7-8750H	1.98 Points +3%
Alienware 17 R5 Intel Core i7-8750H	1.93 Points
Alienware 17 R4 Intel Core i7-7820HK	1.69 Points -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (10.4 - 64.3, n=25, last 2 years)	34.6 Points +208%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 Intel Core i7-8750H	12.88 Points +14%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB Intel Core i7-8750H	12.49 Points +11%
Alienware 17 R5 Intel Core i7-8750H	11.25 Points
Alienware 17 R4 Intel Core i7-7820HK	9.53 Points -15%

PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=198, last 2 years)	7597 Points +40%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5939 Points +9%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A	5589 Points +3%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	5465 Points 0%
Alienware 17 R5 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG	5443 Points

	Alienware 17 R5 SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG	Alienware 17 R4 SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB	Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256GD9MNE-6200A	MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
AS SSD		1%	3%	-67%	47%
Seq Read	2203	1752 -20%	972 -56%	511 -77%	1473 -33%
Seq Write	559	735 31%	838 50%	425.7 -24%	1962 251%
4K Read	38.74	35.61 -8%	38.57 0%	14.07 -64%	31.66 -18%
4K Write	92.7	113.4 22%	80.7 -13%	38.34 -59%	84.4 -9%
Access Time Read *	0.091	0.042 54%		0.235 -158%	0.071 22%
Access Time Write *	0.065	0.123 -89%	0.054 17%	0.097 -49%	0.047 28%
Score Read	706	831 18%	859 22%	417 -41%	1304 85%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2589 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 815 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 321.9 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 279.7 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1293 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 304.5 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 38.84 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 92.6 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=236, last 2 years)	29528 Points +66%
Alienware 17 R4 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	21846 Points +23%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	17980 Points +1%
Alienware 17 R5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	17792 Points
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	17649 Points -1%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	16131 Points -9%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=231, last 2 years)	40586 Points +73%
Alienware 17 R4 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	26438 Points +13%
Alienware 17 R5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	23414 Points
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	23261 Points -1%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	21380 Points -9%

3DMark 11 Performance		18741 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		32992 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		15457 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		5640 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

The Witcher 3 ultra

F1 2018 | The Crew 2 | Need for Speed Payback | Assassin´s Creed Origins | Destiny 2

F1 2018 - 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Alienware 17 R5 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	68 fps

The Crew 2 - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Alienware 17 R5 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	60 fps

Need for Speed Payback - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Alienware 17 R5 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	81.3 fps

Assassin´s Creed Origins - 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset
Alienware 17 R5 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	54 fps

Destiny 2 - 2560x1440 Highest Preset AA:SM AF:16x
Alienware 17 R5 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	82.4 fps

	baixo	média	alto	ultra	QHD
The Witcher 3 (2015)			109	60.8
FIFA 18 (2017)			326	319
Destiny 2 (2017)			142	119	82.4
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017)			77	67	54
Need for Speed Payback (2017)			114	108	81.3
The Crew 2 (2018)			60	60	60
F1 2018 (2018)			117	84	68

Barulho

Ocioso		32 / 33 / 34 dB
HDD		33 dB
Carga		43 / 51 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A)

	Alienware 17 R5 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Alienware 17 R4 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Noise		-4%	3%	0%	5%	10%
off / environment *	30	28.2 6%	30.4 -1%	30 -0%	27.8 7%	24.1 ?(19.5 - 29.9, n=182, last 2 years) 20%
Idle Minimum *	32	35.6 -11%	31.2 2%	32 -0%	31.1 3%	25.6 ?(21.9 - 41.6, n=184, last 2 years) 20%
Idle Average *	33	35.6 -8%	35.3 -7%	33 -0%	31.1 6%	27.4 ?(21.9 - 42.1, n=184, last 2 years) 17%
Idle Maximum *	34	35.7 -5%	35.3 -4%	34 -0%	35 -3%	30.8 ?(21.9 - 47, n=184, last 2 years) 9%
Load Average *	43	50.2 -17%	44.4 -3%	41 5%	42 2%	43.1 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=184, last 2 years) -0%
Witcher 3 ultra *	51	50.2 2%	41 20%	50 2%	44.5 13%
Load Maximum *	51	50.2 2%	45.2 11%	54 -6%	46.5 9%	53.5 ?(43 - 68.2, n=184, last 2 years) -5%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


45 °C	46 °C	44 °C
41 °C	44 °C	43 °C
30 °C	28 °C	28 °C

Máximo: 46 °C
Médio: 38.8 °C


58 °C	56 °C	49 °C
56 °C	55 °C	49 °C
32 °C	32 °C	31 °C

Máximo: 58 °C
Médio: 46.4 °C

alimentação elétrica 53 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


38 °C	40 °C	38 °C
37 °C	36 °C	34 °C
32 °C	29 °C	30 °C

Máximo: 40 °C
Médio: 34.9 °C


41 °C	41 °C	41 °C
40 °C	40 °C	38 °C
31 °C	32 °C	32 °C

Máximo: 41 °C
Médio: 37.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 33 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


43 °C	44 °C	42 °C
40 °C	41 °C	40 °C
31 °C	28 °C	28 °C

Máximo: 44 °C
Médio: 37.4 °C


52 °C	51 °C	46 °C
51 °C	51 °C	43 °C
31 °C	31 °C	31 °C

Máximo: 52 °C
Médio: 43 °C

alimentação elétrica 50 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58 °C / 136 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.1 °C / -5.6 F).

	Alienware 17 R5 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Alienware 17 R4 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Heat		13%	21%	13%	11%	14%
Maximum Upper Side *	46	49.6 -8%	42.6 7%	47 -2%	44.2 4%	46 ?(28.2 - 60, n=182, last 2 years) -0%
Maximum Bottom *	58	56 3%	37.2 36%	49 16%	55.8 4%	49.4 ?(30 - 66.3, n=182, last 2 years) 15%
Idle Upper Side *	40	29.6 26%	33.6 16%	32 20%	31.6 21%	31.4 ?(21.2 - 42.8, n=182, last 2 years) 21%
Idle Bottom *	41	29.2 29%	31 24%	34 17%	35 15%	32.5 ?(22.6 - 45, n=182, last 2 years) 21%

* ... smaller is better

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Alienware 17 R5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Alienware 17 R4 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.2 / 0.4 Watt
Ocioso	28 / 32 / 37 Watt
Carga	112 / 231 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Alienware 17 R5 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Alienware 17 R4 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-13%	6%	21%	20%	22%
Idle Minimum *	28	37.5 -34%	20.4 27%	15 46%	17.8 36%	13.9 ?(2 - 64, n=177, last 2 years) 50%
Idle Average *	32	37.6 -18%	26.5 17%	20 37%	24.7 23%	19.2 ?(8 - 67, n=177, last 2 years) 40%
Idle Maximum *	37	37.6 -2%	37 -0%	26 30%	29.6 20%	27 ?(9 - 101.1, n=177, last 2 years) 27%
Load Average *	112	122.4 -9%	129 -15%	97 13%	110 2%	111.4 ?(32.1 - 202, n=176, last 2 years) 1%
Witcher 3 ultra *	192	180.3 6%	186 3%	186 3%	167.8 13%
Load Maximum *	231	277.4 -20%	216 6%	239 -3%	178.6 23%	251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=175, last 2 years) -9%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		4h 28min
WiFi Websurfing		3h 38min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 04min

	Alienware 17 R5 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 99 Wh	Alienware 17 R4 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 99 Wh	Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-79BY i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 72 Wh	MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 51 Wh	HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 86 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-2%	4%	-14%	23%	68%
Reader / Idle	268	276 3%	253 -6%	303 13%	268 0%	543 ?(57 - 1290, n=83, last 2 years) 103%
WiFi v1.3	218	181 -17%	174 -20%	186 -15%	253 16%	367 ?(57 - 745, n=181, last 2 years) 68%
Load	64	69 8%	88 38%	38 -41%	97 52%	84.3 ?(36 - 173, n=144, last 2 years) 32%
Witcher 3 ultra			66			80.6 ?(47 - 155, n=23, last 2 years)
H.264				193		400 ?(56 - 747, n=94, last 2 years)

Pro

+ Carcaça robusta e de alta qualidade

+ Muitas opções de configuração

+ Numerosos elementos de iluminação

+ Tela QHD rápida e responsiva

+ Bons dispositivos de entrada

+ Bom som

+ Thunderbolt 3

+ SSD NVMe

+ G-Sync

Contra

- O Turbo da CPU poderia ser melhor

- Ângulos de visão limitados

- Desnecessariamente ruidoso em operação 3D

- Poucas opções de manutenção

- Muito grande e pesado

- Duração curta da bateria

- Sem leitor de cartões

Alienware 17 R5, test unit provided by cyberport

Aqueles que procuram um portátil de gama alta e sofisticado, com bons dispositivos de entrada, conexões modernas e muitas opções de iluminação devem ficar satisfeitos com o Alienware 17 R5.

Além de alguns detalhes menores, a carcaça de 17 polegadas é capaz de convencer, contanto que você possa aceitar sua grossura e peso. A baixa duração da bateria também diminui a mobilidade. Para o sucessor, desejaríamos também de um melhor controle do ventilador, já que os ventiladores aceleram desnecessariamente durante a operação 3D.

Há também coisas boas e ruins na tela QHD opcional, que é muito brilhante e também oferece um tempo de resposta muito rápido, por um lado, mas sofre de um valor de preto medíocre e ângulos de visão limitados pelo outro lado. Além disso, o desempenho Turbo da CPU também poderia ser melhor. Durante a carga multi-core, o Core i7-8750H utiliza apenas o overclocking de forma limitada.

No geral, ainda é suficiente para uma posição em nossa lista dos Top 10 dos jogos. Mas o domínio anterior dos portáteis Alienware foi quebrado.

Alienware 17 R5 - 2018-09-06 09/06/2018 v6^(old)
Florian Glaser

Acabamento

86 / 98 → 87%

Teclado

85%

Mouse

81%

Conectividade

68 / 81 → 84%

Peso

45 / 10-66 → 62%

Bateria

73%

Pantalha

84%

Desempenho do jogos

97%

Desempenho da aplicação

99%

Temperatura

81 / 95 → 85%

Ruído

74 / 90 → 82%

Audio

85%

Médio

80%

87%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Alienware 17 R5 (i7-8750H, GTX 1070, QHD)

Florian Glaser, 2018-09-11 (Update: 2018-09-22)

Breve Análise do Portátil Alienware 17 R5 (i7-8750H, GTX 1070, QHD)

Size Comparison

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Alienware 17 R5 audio analysis

Alienware 17 R4 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare