Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil HP Omen 17t (i7-8750H, GTX 1070)

Gigante silencioso. O Omen 17t é um portátil bem balanceado. Seus componentes internos são consistentemente poderosos, sua tela G-Sync de 144 Hz é uma das melhores no mercado, e gerencia calor e ruído com serenidade. Com seu preço competitivo, o Omen 17t é um dos melhores pacotes globais no mercado de portáteis para jogos.

HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 (Omen Serie)
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Análises do: 1443 MHz, Memoría: 2002 MHz, GDDR5 @ 2003.4 MHz (8013.6 effective), 256-bit bus, 2048 CUDA cores, Nvidia GeForce Game Ready Driver 398.82
Memória
16384 MB 
, 2x 8 GB DDR4-2666 SODIMM
Pantalha
17.3 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics AUO309D, IPS, Taxa de atualização de 144 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, 512 GB 
, SSD de 512 GB Samsung PCIe NVMe + HD de 1 TB 7200 RPM HGST, 1406 GB livre
Placa de Som
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Dedicated Mic and Headset jacks, Card Reader: Leitor de cartões SD/SDHC/SDXC, tamanho completo, Brightness Sensor
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 33 x 423 x 304
Bateria
86 Wh, 8 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2x 2 Watt, Bang & Olufsen w/ HP Audio Boost, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, HP Audio, HP CoolSense, HP Omen Center, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
3.654 kg, Suprimento de energia: 727 g
Preço
1750 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus X9 DT
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
202 MB/s ∼100% +148%
Eurocom Q8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
183 MB/s ∼91% +124%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 202, n=203)
90.3 MB/s ∼45% +11%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81.59 MB/s ∼40%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79 MB/s ∼39% -3%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s ∼39% -4%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26 MB/s ∼13% -68%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Aorus X9 DT
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
241 MB/s ∼100% +181%
Eurocom Q8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
209 MB/s ∼87% +143%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=201)
109 MB/s ∼45% +27%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89 MB/s ∼37% +4%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88 MB/s ∼37% +3%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85.84 MB/s ∼36%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
32 MB/s ∼13% -63%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
694 MBit/s ∼100% +8%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
693 MBit/s ∼100% +8%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
681 MBit/s ∼98% +6%
Eurocom Q8
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
648 MBit/s ∼93% +1%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
644 MBit/s ∼93%
Aorus X9 DT
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
639 MBit/s ∼92% -1%
Alienware 17 R4
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
606 MBit/s ∼87% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=175)
595 MBit/s ∼86% -8%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Eurocom Q8
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
682 MBit/s ∼100% +8%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
662 MBit/s ∼97% +5%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
630 MBit/s ∼92%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
624 MBit/s ∼91% -1%
Aorus X9 DT
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
601 MBit/s ∼88% -5%
Alienware 17 R4
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
589 MBit/s ∼86% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (213 - 697, n=175)
533 MBit/s ∼78% -15%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
512 MBit/s ∼75% -19%
304.4
cd/m²
342.3
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
319.3
cd/m²
343.6
cd/m²
322.6
cd/m²
298.7
cd/m²
317.8
cd/m²
308.4
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 343.6 cd/m² Médio: 319.7 cd/m² Minimum: 16.19 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 343.6 cd/m²
Contraste: 1011:1 (Preto: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.74 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 3.49
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
90% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
AU Optronics AUO309D, IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Alienware 17 R4
TN LED, 17.3, 2560x1440
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 17.3, 3840x2160
Asus G752VS-BA338T
AU Optronics B173HAN01.1 (AUO119D), IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Eurocom Q8
AU Optronics B173QTN01.0, Dell P/N WJGD4, TN LED, 17.3, 2560x1440
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
IPS, 17.3, 3840x2160
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
Chi Mei N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN WLED, 17.3, 1920x1080
Aorus X9 DT
AUO B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 17.3, 1920x1080
Response Times
-49%
-170%
-133%
-7%
-206%
-48%
-13%
50%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
17.6 (10, 7.6)
30 (18.8, 11.2)
-70%
50 (24.4, 25.6)
-184%
36 (18, 18)
-105%
21.6 (12.4, 9.2)
-23%
45.6 (22.8, 22.8)
-159%
28 (16.4, 11.6)
-59%
18.4 (9.2, 9.2)
-5%
8 (4.4, 3.6)
55%
Response Time Black / White *
10 (4.8, 5.2)
12.8 (10.8, 2)
-28%
25.6 (11.2, 14.4)
-156%
26 (14.4, 11.6)
-160%
9 (6.8, 2.2)
10%
35.2 (9.2, 26)
-252%
13.6 (11.8, 1.8)
-36%
12 (6.8, 5.2)
-20%
5.6 (3.8, 1.8)
44%
PWM Frequency
1042 (29)
25000 (14)
26000 (19)
Screen
-26%
5%
-27%
-69%
-1%
7%
19%
17%
Brightness middle
343.6
402.3
17%
343
0%
307
-11%
367.9
7%
399.1
16%
273
-21%
280
-19%
240
-30%
Brightness
320
372
16%
328
3%
300
-6%
346
8%
360
13%
273
-15%
262
-18%
248
-22%
Brightness Distribution
87
86
-1%
84
-3%
88
1%
84
-3%
81
-7%
90
3%
86
-1%
83
-5%
Black Level *
0.34
0.62
-82%
0.29
15%
0.32
6%
0.55
-62%
0.4
-18%
0.26
24%
0.22
35%
0.22
35%
Contrast
1011
649
-36%
1183
17%
959
-5%
669
-34%
998
-1%
1050
4%
1273
26%
1091
8%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.74
5.6
-50%
4.01
-7%
5.53
-48%
9.86
-164%
4.78
-28%
3.52
6%
1.78
52%
2.14
43%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.33
9.8
-84%
6.03
-13%
11.54
-117%
17.56
-229%
7.65
-44%
6.34
-19%
3.91
27%
5.04
5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
3.49
4.43
-27%
2.09
40%
1.54
56%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.7
4.7
-27%
4.7
-27%
7
-89%
12.4
-235%
3.8
-3%
3.11
16%
0.74
80%
1.62
56%
Gamma
2.36 93%
2.14 103%
2.4 92%
2.48 89%
2.09 105%
2.03 108%
2.43 91%
2.43 91%
2.28 96%
CCT
6388 102%
7519 86%
6451 101%
8103 80%
11064 59%
7288 89%
6999 93%
6494 100%
6846 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
58
53.7
-7%
88
52%
58
0%
52.5
-9%
86.9
50%
76
31%
60
3%
77
33%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
90
82.2
-9%
100
11%
90
0%
80.5
-11%
100
11%
100
11%
92
2%
100
11%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-38% / -30%
-83% / -24%
-80% / -45%
-38% / -59%
-104% / -35%
-21% / -1%
3% / 14%
34% / 22%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.8 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 7.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8773 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z: CPU
CPU-Z: CPU
CPU-Z: Caches
CPU-Z: Caches
CPU-Z: Mainboard
CPU-Z: Mainboard
CPU-Z: Memory
CPU-Z: Memory
CPU-Z: SPD
CPU-Z: SPD
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO64
HWiNFO64
 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
205 Points ∼96% +24%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (163 - 177, n=47)
173 Points ∼81% +5%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
Intel Core i5-8300H
171 Points ∼80% +4%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
Intel Core i7-8705G
165 Points ∼77% 0%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
Intel Core i7-8750H
165 Points ∼77%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK
162 Points ∼76% -2%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points ∼76% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (79 - 209, n=413)
151 Points ∼71% -8%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
144 Points ∼68% -13%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
140 Points ∼66% -15%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1408 Points ∼45% +31%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1378 Points ∼44% +28%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
1129 Points ∼36% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (863 - 1251, n=50)
1103 Points ∼35% +3%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
Intel Core i7-8750H
1074 Points ∼35%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
Intel Core i5-8300H
818 Points ∼26% -24%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK
770 Points ∼25% -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 1865, n=414)
744 Points ∼24% -31%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
742 Points ∼24% -31%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
Intel Core i7-8705G
707 Points ∼23% -34%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
2.33 Points ∼95% +17%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.99 Points ∼82%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (1.89 - 2, n=32)
1.966 Points ∼81% -1%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
Intel Core i7-8705G
1.89 Points ∼77% -5%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.84 Points ∼75% -8%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.83 Points ∼75% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.71 - 2.38, n=406)
1.679 Points ∼69% -16%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1.63 Points ∼67% -18%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
1.55 Points ∼64% -22%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
15.76 Points ∼58% +22%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
15.05 Points ∼56% +17%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.88 Points ∼48%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
12.5 Points ∼46% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (9.54 - 13.5, n=33)
12.3 Points ∼45% -5%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8.47 Points ∼31% -34%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.19 Points ∼30% -36%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
Intel Core i7-8705G
7.59 Points ∼28% -41%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.13 - 21.2, n=507)
7.26 Points ∼27% -44%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
Intel Core i7-8750H
6561 Points ∼61%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (6292 - 6643, n=11)
6480 Points ∼60% -1%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK
6062 Points ∼56% -8%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5923 Points ∼55% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.85 - 8872, n=398)
4715 Points ∼44% -28%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
4330 Points ∼40% -34%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
4286 Points ∼40% -35%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
Intel Core i7-8750H
34184 Points ∼69%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (29952 - 35307, n=11)
33348 Points ∼67% -2%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
29330 Points ∼59% -14%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
25561 Points ∼51% -25%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK
23052 Points ∼46% -33%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22434 Points ∼45% -34%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.7 - 48808, n=398)
17351 Points ∼35% -49%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
353.153 s * ∼4% -136%
Average of class Gaming
  (117 - 2331, n=201)
327 s * ∼4% -118%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK
215.4 s * ∼3% -44%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (125 - 181, n=6)
158 s * ∼2% -5%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
Intel Core i7-8750H
149.85 s * ∼2%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Average of class Gaming
  (-1 - 207000, n=2871)
3173 Seconds * ∼14% -506%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (1 - 10645, n=37)
2538 Seconds * ∼11% -384%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
693.994 Seconds * ∼3% -32%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
677.2 Seconds * ∼3% -29%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK
545.92 Seconds * ∼2% -4%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
Intel Core i7-8750H
524 Seconds * ∼2%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
13126
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
34184
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6561
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
79.53 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
12.88 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.99 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
119.22 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1074 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
165 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
6055 Points ∼93% +1%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5968 Points ∼92%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (5210 - 5968, n=6)
5621 Points ∼86% -6%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5410 Points ∼83% -9%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
5342 Points ∼82% -10%
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
5088 Points ∼78% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=310)
4919 Points ∼76% -18%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
4623 Points ∼71% -23%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
4541 Points ∼70% -24%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8378 Points ∼88%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
 
8378 Points ∼88% 0%
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
8272 Points ∼87% -1%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
8191 Points ∼86% -2%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
7780 Points ∼82% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (2303 - 9529, n=223)
5475 Points ∼57% -35%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
5859 Points ∼96% +5%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5557 Points ∼91%
Eurocom Q8
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
5111 Points ∼84% -8%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5103 Points ∼84% -8%
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
5064 Points ∼83% -9%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (4271 - 5557, n=6)
4962 Points ∼81% -11%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
4498 Points ∼74% -19%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
4437 Points ∼73% -20%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
4395 Points ∼72% -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=328)
4218 Points ∼69% -24%
PCMark 10 - Score
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
6387 Points ∼82% +8%
Eurocom Q8
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
6331 Points ∼82% +7%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5939 Points ∼76%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
5465 Points ∼70% -8%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (4854 - 5939, n=6)
5414 Points ∼70% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 6959, n=115)
4933 Points ∼64% -17%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5557 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
8378 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5968 pontos
Ajuda
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Alienware 17 R4
SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
Eurocom Q8
Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
Aorus X9 DT
Transcend TS1TMTE850
Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
 
AS SSD
-29%
-4%
-6%
17%
12%
-84%
-22%
-10%
Copy Game MB/s
874.69
573.6
-34%
1033.53
18%
1216.97
39%
958.2
10%
295.55
-66%
941 (607 - 1188, n=14)
8%
Copy Program MB/s
481.13
446.13
-7%
469.95
-2%
445.13
-7%
406.67
-15%
192.94
-60%
398 (233 - 498, n=14)
-17%
Copy ISO MB/s
1080.01
1227.03
14%
1336.93
24%
2144.61
99%
1596.18
48%
412.55
-62%
1377 (917 - 1989, n=14)
27%
Score Total
4142
2072
-50%
2328
-44%
2547
-39%
3056
-26%
3840
-7%
881
-79%
2145
-48%
3864 (2348 - 4771, n=21)
-7%
Score Write
2147
858
-60%
487
-77%
890
-59%
1480
-31%
1579
-26%
254
-88%
916
-57%
1646 (147 - 2147, n=21)
-23%
Score Read
1304
831
-36%
1238
-5%
1112
-15%
1077
-17%
1515
16%
417
-68%
828
-37%
1473 (896 - 2125, n=21)
13%
Access Time Write *
0.047
0.123
-162%
0.033
30%
0.033
30%
0.027
43%
0.035
26%
0.097
-106%
0.038
19%
0.1586 (0.027 - 2.52, n=21)
-237%
Access Time Read *
0.071
0.042
41%
0.049
31%
0.052
27%
0.058
18%
0.043
39%
0.235
-231%
0.042
41%
0.049 (0.029 - 0.073, n=21)
31%
4K-64 Write
1866.02
671.01
-64%
260.86
-86%
646.46
-65%
1185.29
-36%
1284.54
-31%
172.7
-91%
715.2
-62%
1392 (96.2 - 1866, n=21)
-25%
4K-64 Read
1124.72
620.48
-45%
998.94
-11%
851.25
-24%
744.47
-34%
1231.67
10%
351.41
-69%
654.45
-42%
1239 (735 - 1823, n=21)
10%
4K Write
84.44
113.36
34%
112.06
33%
120.78
43%
138.94
65%
107.92
28%
38.34
-55%
98.92
17%
101 (1.76 - 134, n=21)
20%
4K Read
31.66
35.61
12%
45.64
44%
37.51
18%
49.71
57%
35.57
12%
14.07
-56%
22.23
-30%
49.3 (31.7 - 58, n=21)
56%
Seq Write
1962.09
734.8
-63%
1144.4
-42%
1230.12
-37%
1553.97
-21%
1869.29
-5%
425.71
-78%
1018.64
-48%
1534 (487 - 1991, n=21)
-22%
Seq Read
1472.55
1752.03
19%
1933.89
31%
2236.52
52%
2824.25
92%
2480.96
68%
511.18
-65%
1517.93
3%
1850 (1099 - 2469, n=21)
26%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2367 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2038 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 407.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 340.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1284 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1665 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 35.49 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 110.7 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Aorus X9 DT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK
13993 Points ∼77% +18%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
11842 Points ∼65%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
11101 Points ∼61% -6%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
10838 Points ∼60% -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (7137 - 12565, n=58)
9708 Points ∼54% -18%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8705G
8405 Points ∼46% -29%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 1600
7838 Points ∼43% -34%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H
7739 Points ∼43% -35%
Average of class Gaming
  (510 - 16949, n=516)
6873 Points ∼38% -42%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Aorus X9 DT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK
27966 Points ∼55% +31%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (13760 - 25604, n=58)
22405 Points ∼44% +5%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
21380 Points ∼42%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
18349 Points ∼36% -14%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 1600
15182 Points ∼30% -29%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
14367 Points ∼28% -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=515)
11872 Points ∼23% -44%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8705G
9632 Points ∼19% -55%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H
9266 Points ∼18% -57%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Aorus X9 DT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK
22240 Points ∼55% +38%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (15718 - 19059, n=56)
17228 Points ∼42% +7%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
16131 Points ∼40%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
14427 Points ∼36% -11%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
11558 Points ∼28% -28%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 1600
11512 Points ∼28% -29%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=441)
10260 Points ∼25% -36%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H
7576 Points ∼19% -53%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8705G
7059 Points ∼17% -56%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Aorus X9 DT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK
141451 Points ∼77% +26%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
112332 Points ∼61%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (64973 - 125922, n=51)
99208 Points ∼54% -12%
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
95034 Points ∼51% -15%
Schenker XMG Neo 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
81178 Points ∼44% -28%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 1600
70020 Points ∼38% -38%
Average of class Gaming
  (5761 - 184578, n=432)
62056 Points ∼34% -45%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8300H
49254 Points ∼27% -56%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch000
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8705G
37915 Points ∼21% -66%
3DMark 11 Performance
17921 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
37519 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
14335 pontos
Ajuda
012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
78.1 fps ∼68% +37%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
77.4 fps ∼67% +36%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
65 fps ∼57% +14%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
62.9 fps ∼55% +10%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
59.6 fps ∼52% +5%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
59.4 fps ∼52% +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (48.2 - 68.4, n=41)
59.1 fps ∼51% +4%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
57 fps ∼50%
Eurocom Q8
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
48.2 fps ∼42% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=217)
44.8 fps ∼39% -21%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
146 fps ∼79% +76%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
117 fps ∼63% +41%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
113.8 fps ∼62% +37%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (83 - 123, n=30)
105 fps ∼57% +27%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
104 fps ∼56% +25%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
83 fps ∼45%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.1 - 184, n=181)
75.3 fps ∼41% -9%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
118.3 fps ∼73% +36%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
109 fps ∼68% +25%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
99 fps ∼61% +14%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
96.4 fps ∼60% +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (79.1 - 103, n=25)
92.3 fps ∼57% +6%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
87 fps ∼54%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.9 - 126, n=141)
62.4 fps ∼39% -28%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
117.7 fps ∼64% +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
  (83.2 - 119, n=18)
107 fps ∼58% +4%
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
103 fps ∼56%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.6 - 154, n=107)
67.3 fps ∼36% -35%
baixo média alto ultra4K
The Witcher 3 (2015) 2681918357fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 25317410387fps
Rocket League (2017) 250250231173fps
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) 1861279876fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 1408263fps

Barulho

Ocioso
31.1 / 31.1 / 35 dB
Carga
42 / 46.5 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 27.8 dB(A)
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
Eurocom Q8
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
Noise
-10%
-7%
-6%
-2%
-3%
-6%
-21%
off / environment *
27.8
28.2
-1%
29.2
-5%
31
-12%
30
-8%
28
-1%
30
-8%
30
-8%
Idle Minimum *
31.1
35.6
-14%
33.9
-9%
32
-3%
30
4%
28.2
9%
32
-3%
36
-16%
Idle Average *
31.1
35.6
-14%
33.9
-9%
35
-13%
32
-3%
31.8
-2%
33
-6%
37
-19%
Idle Maximum *
35
35.7
-2%
33.9
3%
38
-9%
36
-3%
36.3
-4%
34
3%
43
-23%
Load Average *
42
50.2
-20%
43.8
-4%
42
-0%
43
-2%
46.7
-11%
41
2%
50
-19%
Witcher 3 ultra *
44.5
50.2
-13%
44
1%
43
3%
46.9
-5%
50
-12%
57
-28%
Load Maximum *
46.5
50.2
-8%
53.4
-15%
50
-8%
49
-5%
49.7
-7%
54
-16%
61
-31%

* ... smaller is better

 40.2 °C42.6 °C39.2 °C 
 33.6 °C44.2 °C34 °C 
 28 °C26.2 °C28.2 °C 
Máximo: 44.2 °C
Médio: 35.1 °C
55.8 °C45.8 °C52 °C
36 °C42.4 °C36.4 °C
25.8 °C27.4 °C27 °C
Máximo: 55.8 °C
Médio: 38.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  57.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.4 °C | Fluke 62 Mini
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the bottom side is 55.8 °C / 132 F, compared to the average of 41.6 °C / 107 F, ranging from 21.1 to 78 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.2 °C / 82.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (+0.5 °C / 0.9 F).
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
Eurocom Q8
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
Heat
3%
7%
19%
17%
5%
2%
9%
Maximum Upper Side *
44.2
49.6
-12%
47.6
-8%
39.1
12%
41
7%
43.4
2%
47
-6%
43
3%
Maximum Bottom *
55.8
56
-0%
53.2
5%
42.1
25%
39.3
30%
44
21%
49
12%
55
1%
Idle Upper Side *
31.6
29.6
6%
28.2
11%
27.9
12%
28.8
9%
32.8
-4%
32
-1%
27
15%
Idle Bottom *
35
29.2
17%
28.6
18%
26.1
25%
27.3
22%
34.2
2%
34
3%
29
17%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.440.82534.337.93133.336.34031.933.55033.633.56330.733.38029.730.810029.130.112528.33316027.848.220026.958.125026.665.931526.565.440025.665.350024.964.663025.568.280025.865100024.867.7125024.369.3160024.866.2200024.563.5250023.968.3315023.668.4400023.472.8500023.168.2630023.271.6800023.170.3100002371.11250022.972.61600022.967.9SPL36.481.1N2.753.1median 24.8median 67.7Delta1.64.34542.741.441.632.237.839.245.230.540.629.343.930.154.928.461.426.457.72367.124.972.623.475.120.775.319.876.319.273.518.266.519.272.519.773.31973.917.383.617.18817.384.917.578.317.477.317.378.417.273.717.37317.271.81776.216.878.730.492.91.491.9median 18.2median 73.92.72.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.44 / 0.69 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 17.8 / 24.7 / 29.6 Watt
Carga midlight 110 / 178.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
Asus G752VS-BA338T
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Eurocom Q8
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2, TN LED, 2560x1440, 17.3
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY, TN WLED, 1920x1080, 17.3
Alienware 17 R4
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB, TN LED, 2560x1440, 17.3
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Power Consumption
-37%
-19%
-4%
-10%
2%
-44%
-8%
Idle Minimum *
17.8
27.3
-53%
23
-29%
21
-18%
26.3
-48%
15
16%
37.5
-111%
21.6
-21%
Idle Average *
24.7
34.9
-41%
33
-34%
27
-9%
29
-17%
20
19%
37.6
-52%
26.4
-7%
Idle Maximum *
29.6
37.6
-27%
40
-35%
32
-8%
32.3
-9%
26
12%
37.6
-27%
26.6
10%
Load Average *
110
164.4
-49%
94
15%
86
22%
82.4
25%
97
12%
122.4
-11%
95.6
13%
Load Maximum *
178.6
202.5
-13%
228
-28%
206
-15%
170.2
5%
239
-34%
277.4
-55%
199.6
-12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
167.8
177
-5%
165
2%
192
-14%
186
-11%
180.3
-7%
221.7
-32%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
4h 28min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
4h 13min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 37min
HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 86 Wh
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 74.48 Wh
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 88 Wh
Asus G752VS-BA338T
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 90 Wh
Eurocom Q8
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 66 Wh
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 51 Wh
Alienware 17 R4
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 99 Wh
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 99 Wh
Aorus X9 DT
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 94.24 Wh
Battery Runtime
-30%
0%
27%
-40%
-25%
-18%
28%
-17%
Reader / Idle
268
242
-10%
323
21%
445
66%
303
13%
276
3%
348
30%
252
-6%
WiFi v1.3
253
160
-37%
218
-14%
293
16%
153
-40%
186
-26%
181
-28%
333
32%
190
-25%
Load
97
55
-43%
91
-6%
96
-1%
38
-61%
69
-29%
117
21%
77
-21%

Pro

+ Carcaça resistente
+ Dispositivos de entrada acima da média (teclado e botões dedicados do mouse)
+ Teclas macro incluídas
+ Hardware bem balanceado
+ Desempenho bom e consistente
+ Ruído relativamente baixo da ventoinha
+ O aquecimento é bem gerenciado
+ O painel de 144 Hz é muito fluente
+ A tela apresenta cores precisas e belas
+ Boa quantidade de portas
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ Variedade de opções de manutenção

Contra

- Sem teclado RGB
- Chassi pesado e robusto
- O espaço vazio, uma vez ocupado pela unidade óptica é potencial desperdiçado
- Superado por máquinas com especificações semelhantes
- Sem Optimus
- Duração da bateria medíocre
- Alto-falantes fracos com falta de graves
In review: HP Omen 17t (i7-8750H, GTX 1070). Review unit courtesy of CUKUSA. Use coupon code NBC20 for $20 Off
In review: HP Omen 17t (i7-8750H, GTX 1070). Review unit courtesy of CUKUSA. Use coupon code NBC20 for $20 Off

A história do Omen 17t é de equilíbrio. Os componentes da máquina complementam-se bem, resultando em um excelente pacote com pouco espaço para reclamações. A tela é brilhante com boa reprodução de cores. A poderosa CPU e GPU estão bem ajustadas para jogos em Full HD. O teclado e a qualidade de construção são excelentes e a seleção de portas é ampla. Para completar, o gerenciamento de calor e do ruído do ventilador estão acima da média para esta categoria.

O recurso de destaque aqui é o painel de 144 Hz. As telas de alta taxa de atualização, que eram comumente relegados a portáteis caros no passado, estão lentamente se infiltrando em dispositivos de preço mais baixo, e o Omen 17t é um excelente exemplo da qualidade que pode ser obtida a esse preço. Embora o Omen 17t não seja, de modo algum, um "portátil econômico", seu preço é mais agressivo do que a maioria de seus concorrentes, especialmente aqueles que exibem uma tela com taxa de atualização alta.

O Omen 17t tem algumas fraquezas. Em particular, a duração da bateria é fraca (devido à falta de Optimus) e os alto-falantes são repugnantes (graças ao ruído desagradável em volumes mais altos). Além disso, a unidade de inicialização PM981 da Samsung exibe um comportamento estranho, mas isso pode ser específico da nossa unidade. A HP também errou ao não usar o espaço adicional disponibilizado pela remoção da unidade óptica. No entanto, todas essas desvantagens não são críticas para um portátil de jogos.

Em suma, o HP Omen 17t é um pacote bem construído que ter sido cuidadosamente projetado. A tela de 144 Hz é um bom recurso nesta faixa de preço, e os componentes internos são (principalmente) capazes de aproveitar a maior taxa de atualização e o G-Sync. O Omen 17t é um bom exemplo de um portátil de jogos "poli funcional, mestre de alguns", e seu preço competitivo faz com que valha a pena considerá-lo.

HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 - 08/21/2018 v6
Sam Medley

Acabamento
83 / 98 → 85%
Teclado
88%
Mouse
81%
Conectividade
64 / 81 → 79%
Peso
52 / 10-66 → 74%
Bateria
Pantalha
90%
Desempenho do jogos
97%
Desempenho da aplicação
95%
Temperatura
86 / 95 → 90%
Ruído
79 / 90 → 88%
Audio
69%
Camera
50 / 85 → 59%
Médio
78%
87%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil HP Omen 17t (i7-8750H, GTX 1070)
Sam Medley, 2018-08-28 (Update: 2018-09- 8)