Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T: Subportátil fino e leve para uma carteira gorda
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84.2 % | 11/2019 | Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR i7-8500Y, UHD Graphics 615 | 890 g | 9.95 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 85.5 % | 09/2018 | Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T i7-7Y75, HD Graphics 615 | 1.2 kg | 8.98 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.8 % | 03/2019 | Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.2 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 85 % | 04/2019 | LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620 | 994 g | 15.2 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 88.4 % | 11/2018 | Apple MacBook Air 2018 i5-8210Y, UHD Graphics 617 | 1.2 kg | 15.6 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1600 | |
| 90.5 % | 03/2020 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QES01L00 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.1 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.3 % | 06/2018 | Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620 | 930 g | 15 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 79 %
iluminação com acumulador: 293 cd/m²
Contraste: 3116:1 (Preto: 0.095 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
71% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.15
| Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Apple MacBook Air 2018 IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QES01L00 IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -8% | -9% | -6% | -3% | -6% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 69.9 | 63.5 -9% | 63.5 -9% | 64.7 -7% | 67.8 -3% | 64.5 -8% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.4 | 94.2 -5% | 90.9 -9% | 94.3 -5% | 96.1 -3% | 95.8 -4% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71 | 64.6 -9% | 64.6 -9% | 66 -7% | 69.8 -2% | 65.7 -7% |
| Response Times | 4% | 16% | 17% | 18% | 14% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 55 ? | 51 ? 7% | 42 ? 24% | 36.8 ? 33% | 39.6 ? 28% | 44.8 ? 19% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30 ? | 30 ? -0% | 28 ? 7% | 30 ? -0% | 28 ? 7% | 27.6 ? 8% |
| PWM Frequency | 113600 ? | |||||
| Screen | -24% | -46% | -39% | -4% | -22% | |
| Brightness middle | 296 | 304 3% | 321 8% | 333.8 13% | 320 8% | 381 29% |
| Brightness | 272 | 309 14% | 282 4% | 307 13% | 315 16% | 375 38% |
| Brightness Distribution | 79 | 83 5% | 77 -3% | 83 5% | 95 20% | 94 19% |
| Black Level * | 0.095 | 0.26 -174% | 0.2 -111% | 0.4 -321% | 0.29 -205% | 0.24 -153% |
| Contrast | 3116 | 1169 -62% | 1605 -48% | 835 -73% | 1103 -65% | 1588 -49% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.1 | 3.99 -29% | 6.35 -105% | 3.54 -14% | 1.2 61% | 4.6 -48% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.2 | 5.47 12% | 12.2 -97% | 5.8 6% | 3.2 48% | 8.5 -37% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 4.32 4% | 8.35 -86% | 4.7 -4% | 0.8 82% | 5.1 -13% |
| Gamma | 2.15 102% | 2.27 97% | 2.51 88% | 2.14 103% | 2.2 100% | 2.52 87% |
| CCT | 7277 89% | 7261 90% | 8227 79% | 6261 104% | 6548 99% | 7052 92% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 65 | 59 -9% | 59 -9% | 61.2 -6% | 62.1 -4% | 60.7 -7% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99 | 94 -5% | 91 -8% | 94.7 -4% | 96 -3% | 95.7 -3% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.36 | 1.88 | 2.36 | 0.5 | 1.2 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -9% /
-17% | -13% /
-30% | -9% /
-25% | 4% /
-1% | -5% /
-14% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 25 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 30 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T | |
| Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8500Y () | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T | |
| Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8500Y () | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 (Edge 42.17134.1.0) | |
| LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 (Edge 41.16299.334.0) | |
| Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR (Edge 44) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8500Y (1281 - 1822, n=4) | |
| Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T (Edge 42.17134.1.0) | |
| Porsche Design Ultra One | |
| VAIO A12-92993 (Edge: 44.17763.1.0) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T (Edge 44) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2018 (Safari 12.0.1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1913, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (49893 - 98093, n=33, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2018 (Safari 12.0.1) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T (Edge 44) | |
| Porsche Design Ultra One | |
| LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 (Edge 41.16299.334.0) | |
| VAIO A12-92993 (Edge: 44.17763.1.0) | |
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 (Edge 42.17134.1.0) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8500Y (22283 - 25962, n=4) | |
| Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T (Edge 42.17134.1.0) | |
| Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR (Edge 44) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2018 (Safari 12.0.1) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T (Edge 44) | |
| LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 (Edge 41.16299.334.0) | |
| Porsche Design Ultra One | |
| Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T (Edge 42.17134.1.0) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8500Y (161.5 - 183.7, n=3) | |
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 (Edge 42.17134.1.0) | |
| Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR (Edge 44) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2588 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 2528 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4141 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 2884 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG | Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T SK Hynix BC501 NVMe 256 GB | Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G | LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF | Apple MacBook Air 2018 Apple SSD AP0256 | Average SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 61% | 71% | -11% | 50% | 46% | |
| Write 4K | 48.38 | 132.6 174% | 99.9 106% | 74.7 54% | 118 144% | 95.5 ? 97% |
| Read 4K | 28.98 | 19.97 -31% | 40.03 38% | 14.89 -49% | 29.97 3% | 38.3 ? 32% |
| Write Seq | 743 | 765 3% | 973 31% | 502 -32% | 1000 35% | 759 ? 2% |
| Read Seq | 1027 | 866 -16% | 1111 8% | 498.6 -51% | 1218 19% | 1022 ? 0% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 94.6 | 390.2 312% | 424.6 349% | 214.3 127% | 232.1 145% | 303 ? 220% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 300 | 465.6 55% | 255.9 -15% | 225.5 -25% | 254 -15% | 317 ? 6% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 870 | 817 -6% | 1300 49% | 505 -42% | 1001 15% | 885 ? 2% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1640 | 1637 0% | 1723 5% | 560 -66% | 2555 56% | 1803 ? 10% |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 6817 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1377 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 37488 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5389 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 836 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 315 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 51.2 | 25.7 | 16.9 | 7.9 |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 38.8 | 25 | 18.2 | 6.1 |
| GTA V (2015) | 16.4 | 16.9 | ||
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 12.1 | 5.9 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 52.6 | 17.4 | 11.3 | 10.3 |
| Prey (2017) | 14.1 | 6.9 | ||
| Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) | 15 | 7 | ||
| Fortnite (2018) | 15.9 | 8 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 6.1 | 3.3 | ||
| World of Tanks enCore (2018) | 95.1 | 11.8 | ||
| Metro Exodus (2019) | 6.2 | 3.5 | ||
| Control (2019) | 7.6 | 2.4 | ||
| Borderlands 3 (2019) | 7.3 | 3.1 | ||
| GRID 2019 (2019) | 17.7 | 6.9 |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.4 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.5 °C / 94.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-6.2 °C / -11.2 F).
| Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR i7-8500Y, UHD Graphics 615 | Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T i7-7Y75, HD Graphics 615 | Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620 | LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620 | Apple MacBook Air 2018 i5-8210Y, UHD Graphics 617 | Average Intel UHD Graphics 615 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 13% | 13% | 8% | 17% | 7% | 6% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 55 | 44.7 19% | 41 25% | 45.2 18% | 44.4 19% | 43.7 ? 21% | 42.7 ? 22% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 51.4 | 42.8 17% | 41.4 19% | 41.4 19% | 41.2 20% | 44.7 ? 13% | 45.3 ? 12% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 27.1 | 25.5 6% | 26.1 4% | 26.8 1% | 23.6 13% | 27.8 ? -3% | 27.9 ? -3% |
| Idle Bottom * | 27.1 | 24.8 8% | 25.8 5% | 29 -7% | 23.2 14% | 28 ? -3% | 28.7 ? -6% |
* ... smaller is better
Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (58.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.55 / 0.7 Watt |
| Ocioso |  2.7 / 4.9 / 5.8 Watt |
| Carga |
15.7 / 21.7 Watt |
    
| |
| Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR i7-8500Y, UHD Graphics 615 | Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T i7-7Y75, HD Graphics 615 | Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620 | LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620 | Apple MacBook Air 2018 i5-8210Y, UHD Graphics 617 | Average Intel UHD Graphics 615 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -12% | -55% | -41% | -36% | -24% | -125% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.7 | 2.8 -4% | 2.7 -0% | 2.7 -0% | 2.2 19% | 3.55 ? -31% | 4.9 ? -81% |
| Idle Average * | 4.9 | 5.5 -12% | 5.8 -18% | 6 -22% | 5.7 -16% | 6.17 ? -26% | 8.36 ? -71% |
| Idle Maximum * | 5.8 | 7.9 -36% | 10.2 -76% | 6.5 -12% | 10.3 -78% | 7.61 ? -31% | 10.4 ? -79% |
| Load Average * | 15.7 | 18.4 -17% | 34.9 -122% | 32.5 -107% | 25.6 -63% | 18.2 ? -16% | 45.9 ? -192% |
| Load Maximum * | 21.7 | 20 8% | 35 -61% | 35.5 -64% | 30.6 -41% | 25.4 ? -17% | 66 ? -204% |
* ... smaller is better
| Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR i7-8500Y, UHD Graphics 615, 31.9 Wh | Acer Swift 7 SF714-51T i7-7Y75, HD Graphics 615, Wh | LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 72 Wh | Apple MacBook Air 2018 i5-8210Y, UHD Graphics 617, 50.3 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QES01L00 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 36 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -14% | 37% | 9% | -12% | 7% | -24% | 4% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1273 | 1176 -8% | 2238 76% | 962 -24% | 1252 ? -2% | |||
| H.264 | 631 | 450 -29% | 740 17% | 688 9% | 466 -26% | 794 ? 26% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 526 | 452 -14% | 720 37% | 668 27% | 562 7% | 563 7% | 313 -40% | 629 ? 20% |
| Load | 160 | 154 -4% | 159 -1% | 131 -18% | 76 -52% | 150 -6% | 115.4 ? -28% |
Pro
Contra
Com o Swift 7 SF714-52T, a Acer introduziu no mercado um portátil ultraleve e ultrafino de 14 polegadas. O dispositivo, que está equipado com uma elegante carcaça de magnésio, tem um peso de 890 gramas (~1,96 lb) e atitude de 9,95 mm (~0,39 pol.). No entanto, uma consequência da construção leve é que a carcaça não é muito robusta.
Com o Swift 7 SF714-52T, a Acer fornece principalmente um estudo sobre o que é possível. O uso prático limitado do dispositivo e um preço de compra de quase 2.000 Euros (~US$ 2.226) tornam o dispositivo atraente apenas para um grupo muito pequeno de clientes.
O computador é impulsionado por um processador Core-i7 Amber Lake resfriado passivamente, cujo desempenho é suficiente para aplicativos das áreas de escritório e da Internet. Portanto, o dispositivo pode ser usado principalmente para escrever e navegar. Os usuários que precisam de muito desempenho computacional estão no endereço errado com o Swift 7.
A memória de trabalho e o SSD estão soldados na placa principal, portanto você não pode atualizar esses componentes. No entanto, isso não deve ser necessário na maioria dos casos. Com 16 GB de memória de trabalho (modo de canal duplo) e um SSD NVMe de 512 GB, o dispositivo está bem equipado. Somente em caso de defeito, você precisará enviar o dispositivo.
O portátil de 14 polegadas oferece um teclado que é adequado para as tarefas diárias e oferece uma iluminação de teclado em de uma só fase. Isto é acompanhado por uma muito boa duração da bateria. A tela táctil IPS ganha pontos com ângulos de visão estáveis, um contraste excelente, uma representação de cores muito decente e uma boa cobertura do espaço de cores. Por outro lado, o brilho máximo resulta ser muito baixo.
As duas portas Thunderbolt -3 permitem a conexão de soluções docking e uma GPU externa poderosa. As portas suportam Power Delivery 3.0 e DisplayPort via USB-C (você precisa adquirir um adaptador separado para isso).
Acer Swift 7 SF714-52T-76MR
-
11/07/2019 v7
Sascha Mölck
Pricecompare
