Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Acer Swift 5 SF514 (i5-8250U, UHD 620)
| SD Card Reader | |
| maximum SDCardreader Maximum Transfer Rate | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (23.6 - 239, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| average SDCardreader Average Transfer Rate | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18.9 - 193.9, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 254 cd/m²
Contraste: 1016:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.85 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 3.66
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
71% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.43
| Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY AU Optronics AUO203D, , 1920x1080, 14.00 | Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV AU Optronics B140HAN3.2, , 1920x1080, 14.00 | Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620) Chi Mei CMN14C9, , 1920x1080, 14.00 | Toshiba Tecra X40-D Toshiba TOS508F, , 1920x1080, 14.00 | Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA AU Optronics AUO383D / B140HAN03.8, , 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE B140HAN03_1, , 1920x1080, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -8% | -39% | -40% | -14% | -11% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 69.7 | 62.8 -10% | 40.96 -41% | 40.55 -42% | 58.7 -16% | 61.6 -12% |
| sRGB Coverage | 97.1 | 91.3 -6% | 61.4 -37% | 61 -37% | 86.9 -11% | 87.6 -10% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71 | 64.3 -9% | 42.34 -40% | 41.89 -41% | 59.9 -16% | 62.6 -12% |
| Response Times | -30% | -19% | -10% | 7% | -31% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 37 ? | 51 ? -38% | 43 ? -16% | 38 ? -3% | 24 ? 35% | 48 ? -30% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 23 ? | 28 ? -22% | 28 ? -22% | 26.8 ? -17% | 28 ? -22% | 30.4 ? -32% |
| PWM Frequency | 200 ? | 20410 ? | ||||
| Screen | -10% | -20% | -33% | 6% | 11% | |
| Brightness middle | 254 | 393 55% | 281 11% | 283.9 12% | 337 33% | 278 9% |
| Brightness | 231 | 338 46% | 259 12% | 261 13% | 295 28% | 271 17% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 79 -8% | 81 -6% | 85 -1% | 81 -6% | 91 6% |
| Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.29 -16% | 0.45 -80% | 0.25 -0% | 0.21 16% | 0.16 36% |
| Contrast | 1016 | 1355 33% | 624 -39% | 1136 12% | 1605 58% | 1738 71% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.85 | 6.17 -60% | 4.19 -9% | 6.4 -66% | 4.89 -27% | 4.5 -17% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.05 | 11.21 -59% | 10.64 -51% | 18.7 -165% | 8.43 -20% | 8.4 -19% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.66 | |||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.1 | 6.8 -66% | 2.55 38% | 6.3 -54% | 4.28 -4% | 3.2 22% |
| Gamma | 2.43 91% | 2.27 97% | 2.24 98% | 2.39 92% | 2.25 98% | 2.02 109% |
| CCT | 7369 88% | 6873 95% | 6555 99% | 6511 100% | 7352 88% | 7042 92% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63 | 51 -19% | 39 -38% | 38 -40% | 56 -11% | 57 -10% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97 | 91 -6% | 61 -37% | 60 -38% | 87 -10% | 87.5 -10% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -16% /
-12% | -26% /
-24% | -28% /
-31% | -0% /
2% | -10% /
1% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3264 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4700 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 2619 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620) Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK | Average Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -25% | 12% | -23% | 23% | 15% | |
| Read Seq | 1113 | 517 -54% | 1137 2% | 435.3 -61% | 1277 15% | 1122 ? 1% |
| Write Seq | 597 | 258.1 -57% | 606 2% | 413.3 -31% | 648 9% | 524 ? -12% |
| Read 512 | 642 | 355 -45% | 800 25% | 325.9 -49% | 972 51% | 767 ? 19% |
| Write 512 | 472.8 | 258.5 -45% | 564 19% | 357 -24% | 311 -34% | 541 ? 14% |
| Read 4k | 29.58 | 29.65 0% | 31.6 7% | 26.28 -11% | 34.63 17% | 29.9 ? 1% |
| Write 4k | 89.2 | 77.3 -13% | 108.3 21% | 85.6 -4% | 128.5 44% | 114.5 ? 28% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 289.5 | 277.1 -4% | 290.1 0% | 246.7 -15% | 477.3 65% | 279 ? -4% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 203.3 | 242.5 19% | 251 23% | 224.4 10% | 241.2 19% | 356 ? 75% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1580 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6668 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 903 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (37 - 249, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (8.8 - 50.9, n=64) | |
| Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA | |
| Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE | |
| Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY | |
| 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (29 - 264, n=46, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (8 - 27.9, n=29) | |
| Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV | |
| Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY | |
| Rocket League | |
| 1280x720 Performance | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (20.1 - 95, n=26) | |
| Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY | |
| 1920x1080 Performance | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (17.1 - 78.4, n=13) | |
| Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY | |
| 1920x1080 Quality AA:Medium FX | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (13.1 - 43, n=24) | |
| Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY | |
| 1920x1080 High Quality AA:High FX | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (13.2 - 24.7, n=21) | |
| Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (10.4 - 110.7, n=82) | |
| Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA | |
| Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV | |
| Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6.5 - 49.3, n=62) | |
| Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV | |
| Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 9.59 | 8 | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 17.18 | 9.32 | ||
| Rocket League (2017) | 57.6 | 23.74 | 14.52 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.3 / 30.3 / 31.2 dB |
| Carga |
| 33.1 / 34.4 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.3 dB(A) | ||
| Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620) HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | Toshiba Tecra X40-D HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 1% | 1% | 3% | -1% | -1% | |
| off / environment * | 30.3 | 30.5 -1% | 30.6 -1% | 28 8% | 30.2 -0% | 29.6 2% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.3 | 30.5 -1% | 30.6 -1% | 28 8% | 30.2 -0% | 29.6 2% |
| Idle Average * | 30.3 | 30.5 -1% | 30.6 -1% | 28 8% | 30.2 -0% | 29.6 2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31.2 | 30.5 2% | 31.1 -0% | 28.2 10% | 31.2 -0% | 32.2 -3% |
| Load Average * | 33.1 | 32.25 3% | 34 -3% | 33.2 -0% | 35.7 -8% | 34.2 -3% |
| Load Maximum * | 34.4 | 32.6 5% | 31.45 9% | 39.9 -16% | 34.2 1% | 36.1 -5% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.7 °C / 83.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-0.4 °C / -0.8 F).
| Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620) HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | Toshiba Tecra X40-D HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 9% | 12% | 1% | 15% | -4% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 42.9 | 39.4 8% | 39.6 8% | 43 -0% | 33.3 22% | 48.5 -13% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 44.9 | 40 11% | 40.4 10% | 42 6% | 33.2 26% | 46.1 -3% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 28.4 | 25.8 9% | 23.7 17% | 29.2 -3% | 27 5% | 28.5 -0% |
| Idle Bottom * | 28.5 | 26.5 7% | 24.7 13% | 27.8 2% | 27.2 5% | 27.8 2% |
* ... smaller is better
Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.15 / 0.31 Watt |
| Ocioso | 2.8 / 4.8 / 6.3 Watt |
| Carga |
21 / 23 Watt |
   
| |
| Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620) i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Toshiba Tecra X40-D i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -48% | -35% | -38% | -24% | -53% | -59% | -104% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.8 | 3.6 -29% | 3.7 -32% | 5.2 -86% | 3.3 -18% | 3.8 -36% | 3.81 ? -36% | 4.9 ? -75% |
| Idle Average * | 4.8 | 7 -46% | 6.1 -27% | 6.9 -44% | 6.1 -27% | 7.1 -48% | 6.94 ? -45% | 8.36 ? -74% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.3 | 9.3 -48% | 8.8 -40% | 7 -11% | 10.1 -60% | 8.3 -32% | 8.75 ? -39% | 10.4 ? -65% |
| Load Average * | 21 | 37 -76% | 30.6 -46% | 24.6 -17% | 24.6 -17% | 34.2 -63% | 35 ? -67% | 45.9 ? -119% |
| Load Maximum * | 23 | 32.6 -42% | 29.6 -29% | 30.1 -31% | 22 4% | 43.3 -88% | 47.5 ? -107% | 66 ? -187% |
* ... smaller is better
| Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 36 Wh | Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 53.9 Wh | Acer Swift 3 (i5-7200U, HD 620) i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Toshiba Tecra X40-D i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Asus Zenbook 3 Deluxe UX490UA i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 46 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 17% | 109% | -4% | 30% | 16% | 45% | |
| Reader / Idle | 962 | 1014 5% | 876 -9% | 1032 7% | 819 -15% | 1252 ? 30% | |
| H.264 | 466 | 555 19% | 573 23% | 794 ? 70% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 313 | 549 75% | 653 109% | 357 14% | 562 80% | 547 75% | 629 ? 101% |
| Load | 150 | 100 -33% | 126 -16% | 153 2% | 122 -19% | 115.4 ? -23% | |
| WiFi | 653 |
Pro
Contra
Avaliar e classificar o Acer Swift 5 tem sido um verdadeiro desafio, para dizer o mínimo. Seu peso muito baixo de menos de 1 kg é certamente uma grande vantagem. No entanto, devido à portabilidade da tela escura e altamente reflexiva, sofreu consideravelmente.
Os aspectos positivos incluem a tela mais do que aceitável (exceto pelo brilho mencionado anteriormente), a tela táctil, o SSD rápido e seu baixo consumo de energia.
O outro lado da moeda acabou por ser bastante perturbador, no entanto. Mais notavelmente, o afogamento maciço do dispositivo exibiu um desempenho reduzido consideravelmente (mas também ofereceu uma explicação para o baixo consumo de energia). O Swift 5 lidou muito bem com curtos períodos de alto desempenho, mas praticamente se rendeu à carga pesada de longa duração - um compromisso exigido pelo design altamente portátil e leve. Inclusive o próprio predecessor da Swift 5 resultou ser mais veloz. Outro sacrifício em nome do baixo peso foi a capacidade da bateria e, consequentemente, a duração da bateria. E por último, mas não menos importante, a qualidade de construção estava longe de ser perfeita.
O Acer Swift 5 faz grandes compromissos em nome do baixo peso. Ele é voltado para um grupo muito especial de usuários que preferem um subportátil especialmente leve a um portátil de alto desempenho.
Apesar de seu público-alvo muito específico, consideramos que os problemas extremos de afogamento precisam ser melhorados urgentemente. Nossa lista de desejos para um possível sucessor também inclui uma tela mais clara de qualidade comparável.
Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY
-
06/18/2018 v6(old)
Christian Hintze
Pricecompare
