Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Conversível Microsoft Surface Book 3 15: Ainda é ótimo, mas será que é melhor que o seu antecessor?
Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 (Surface Book 3 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-1065G7 4 x 1.3 - 3.9 GHz, Ice Lake-U
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Geforce 442.19, Optimus mit Intel UHD Graphics
Memória
16 GB
, LPDDR4x
Pantalha
15.00 polegadas 3:2, 3240 x 2160 pixel 260 PPI, sim, native pen support, LG Philips LGD0554, IPS, Brilhante: sim, detachable screen, 60 Hz
placa mãe
Intel 495 (Ice Lake-U PCH-LP Premium)
Disco rígido
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG, 200 GB livre
peso
1.907 kg, Suprimento de energia: 452 g
Preço
2599 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88.3 % | 06/2020 | Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | 1.9 kg | 23 mm | 15.00" | 3240x2160 | |
02/2018 | Microsoft Surface Book 2 15 i7-8650U, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | 1.9 kg | 23 mm | 15.00" | 3240x2160 | ||
| 89.4 % | 03/2020 | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 20 i9-9980HK, Radeon Pro Vega 20 | 1.8 kg | 15.5 mm | 15.40" | 2880x1800 | |
| 86.5 % | 03/2020 | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T i7-10510U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | 1.9 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
| 88.2 % | 10/2019 | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.4 kg | 14.95 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Average of class Convertible (17.7 - 209, n=36, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Average of class Convertible (22.6 - 263, n=35, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 15; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø893 (708-946)
Microsoft Surface Book 3 15; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø670 (617-713)
9.5 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
10 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
11 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LG Philips LGD0554 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 437 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 413.2 cd/m² Minimum: 3.8 cd/m²iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 429 cd/m²
Contraste: 1861:1 (Preto: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.65 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.99 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 3.12
| Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 LG Philips LGD0554, IPS, 3240x2160, 15.00 | Microsoft Surface Book 2 15 LG Philips LGD0554, IPS, 3240x2160, 15.00 | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T BOE HF NE156QUM-N64, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL LP140WF9-SPE2, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 7% | 6% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 61.5 | 66.2 8% | 66 7% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 92.7 | 97.2 5% | 97.9 6% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63.6 | 68.3 7% | 67.3 6% | |
| Response Times | 2894% | -49% | -26% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 38 ? | 37.6 ? 1% | 60 ? -58% | 49.6 ? -31% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 25 ? | 22.4 ? 10% | 35 ? -40% | 30 ? -20% |
| PWM Frequency | 250 ? | 21930 ? 8672% | ||
| Screen | 16% | 4% | 1% | |
| Brightness middle | 428 | 446 4% | 351 -18% | 384 -10% |
| Brightness | 413 | 444 8% | 335 -19% | 363 -12% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 89 0% | 87 -2% | 90 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.25 -9% | 0.31 -35% | 0.17 26% |
| Contrast | 1861 | 1784 -4% | 1132 -39% | 2259 21% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.65 | 1.7 36% | 1.74 34% | 3.5 -32% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.12 | 2.7 67% | 2.76 66% | 5.5 32% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.92 | 1 -9% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.99 | 1.7 57% | 2.22 44% | 4.6 -15% |
| Gamma | 3.12 71% | 2.11 104% | 2.35 94% | 2.32 95% |
| CCT | 6309 103% | 6384 102% | 6667 97% | 6884 94% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58 | 58.6 1% | 62 7% | 62 7% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93 | 92.9 0% | 97 4% | 97.7 5% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1455% /
680% | -13% /
-2% | -6% /
-1% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 250 Hz | ≤ 50 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø553 (543.52-602.8)
Microsoft Surface Book 2 15 Intel Core i7-8650U, Intel Core i7-8650U; Best Performance: Ø593 (581.66-669.98)
Microsoft Surface Book 2 15 Intel Core i7-8650U, Intel Core i7-8650U; Better Performance: Ø589 (551.98-657.09)
Microsoft Surface Book 2 15 Intel Core i7-8650U, Intel Core i7-8650U; Recommended: Ø547 (539.19-648.97)
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T Intel Core i7-10510U, Intel Core i7-10510U: Ø755 (699.58-835.95)
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7; Performance Mode: Ø702 (693.71-740.11)
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø672 (659-720)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average of class Convertible (116.8 - 755, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 20 | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (358 - 474, n=31) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Convertible (242 - 6954, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 20 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (1081 - 2024, n=31) | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Convertible (68.6 - 287, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 20 | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 | |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 15 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (141 - 190, n=35) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Convertible (110.1 - 2889, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 20 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 15 | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 15 | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 15 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (288 - 836, n=36) | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (675 - 1650, n=23) | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 | |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
| Average of class Convertible (193 - 3620, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (2046 - 6417, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (3289 - 4589, n=24) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Convertible (7703 - 72400, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (10406 - 22898, n=24) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Average of class Convertible (319 - 1981, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (948 - 1348, n=18) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Convertible (663 - 14016, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (2464 - 4855, n=18) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Convertible (0.61 - 20.1, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (2.2 - 6.38, n=22) | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (46.9 - 85.3, n=19) | |
| Average of class Convertible (42 - 223, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (0.661 - 0.798, n=18) | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 | |
| Average of class Convertible (0.4102 - 1.967, n=64, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3382 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4415 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4317 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG | Microsoft Surface Book 2 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Average SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 19% | 98% | 101% | 5% | |
| Write 4K | 87.4 | 140.6 61% | 137.8 58% | 128.4 47% | 96.6 ? 11% |
| Read 4K | 38.14 | 43.62 14% | 44.15 16% | 46.37 22% | 39.1 ? 3% |
| Write Seq | 610 | 343.3 -44% | 2073 240% | 1863 205% | 637 ? 4% |
| Read Seq | 1029 | 1452 41% | 2165 110% | 2340 127% | 1032 ? 0% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 280.3 | 344.4 23% | 431.9 54% | 451.1 61% | 303 ? 8% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 259.6 | 457.2 76% | 427.7 65% | 415.3 60% | 298 ? 15% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 829 | 344.3 -58% | 2253 172% | 2985 260% | 822 ? -1% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 2037 | 2885 42% | 3480 71% | 2565 26% | 2030 ? 0% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 451.4 | ||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 1004 | ||||
| AS SSD | 113% | 123% | -11% | ||
| Seq Read | 1625 | 2739 69% | 2525 55% | 1370 ? -16% | |
| Seq Write | 461.3 | 1307 183% | 1253 172% | 493 ? 7% | |
| 4K Read | 37.2 | 47.43 28% | 59.1 59% | 38.2 ? 3% | |
| 4K Write | 100.9 | 126 25% | 134.1 33% | 104 ? 3% | |
| 4K-64 Read | 501 | 1013 102% | 1010 102% | 493 ? -2% | |
| 4K-64 Write | 311.7 | 1371 340% | 1461 369% | 339 ? 9% | |
| Access Time Read * | 0.072 | 0.082 -14% | 0.052 28% | 0.06 ? 17% | |
| Access Time Write * | 0.036 | 0.029 19% | 0.029 19% | 0.086 ? -139% | |
| Score Read | 701 | 1335 90% | 1322 89% | 669 ? -5% | |
| Score Write | 459 | 1628 255% | 1721 275% | 493 ? 7% | |
| Score Total | 1470 | 3582 144% | 3670 150% | 1471 ? 0% | |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1931 | 2016 | 786 ? | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 457.9 | 542 | 252 ? | ||
| Copy Game MB/s | 1242 | 1278 | 376 ? | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 19% /
19% | 106% /
107% | 112% /
114% | -3% /
-4% |
* ... smaller is better
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
Sequential Read:
1005 MB/s
Sequential Write:
679 MB/s
512K Read:
865 MB/s
512K Write:
542 MB/s
4K Read:
39.1 MB/s
4K Write:
88 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
235 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
268.6 MB/s
Dauerleistung Lesen: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
No graph data
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 14387 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 16807 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 10103 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 4820 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Battlefield V | |
| 1280x720 Low Preset | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q (94.3 - 152, n=3) | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 | |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q (74.6 - 102.6, n=3) | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 | |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q (65.9 - 92.2, n=3) | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 | |
| Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q (61 - 85, n=3) | |
| 3840x2160 Ultra Preset | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q () | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-1065G7, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG: Ø43.6 (39-48)
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 144.5 | 111.4 | 64.4 | 44.8 | 30.9 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 113 | 102.1 | 93.8 | 86.3 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 68.8 | 62.9 | 55.4 | ||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 68 | 54 | 53 | 50 | 30 |
| Battlefield V (2018) | 94.3 | 82.9 | 77.5 | 73 | 37.9 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.2 / 30.2 / 30.2 dB |
| Carga |
| 30.9 / 34.3 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.2 dB(A) | ||
| Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-1065G7, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG | Microsoft Surface Book 2 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -5% | -1% | 1% | |
| off / environment * | 30.2 | 29.1 4% | 30.3 -0% | 29.3 3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.2 | 29.1 4% | 30.3 -0% | 29.3 3% |
| Idle Average * | 30.2 | 29.1 4% | 30.3 -0% | 29.3 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.2 | 29.1 4% | 30.3 -0% | 29.3 3% |
| Load Average * | 30.9 | 35.7 -16% | 33.7 -9% | 33.3 -8% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 45.1 | 37.4 17% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 34.3 | 45.3 -32% | 38.9 -13% | 33.3 3% |
* ... smaller is better
| Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-1065G7, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG | Microsoft Surface Book 2 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 7% | 7% | 9% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 41.4 | 43.5 -5% | 42.6 -3% | 41 1% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 39.7 | 42.7 -8% | 41.5 -5% | 44.6 -12% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 34.6 | 28.4 18% | 26.4 24% | 24.4 29% |
| Idle Bottom * | 30.3 | 23.7 22% | 26.3 13% | 25 17% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38.8 °C / 101.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-10.7 °C / -19.2 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38.8 °C / 101.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-10.7 °C / -19.2 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (65.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.8 / 1 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.2 / 7.4 / 9 Watt |
| Carga |
78 / 108 Watt |
   
| |
| Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG, IPS, 3240x2160, 15.00 | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T i7-10510U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 20 i9-9980HK, Radeon Pro Vega 20, Apple SSD AP1024, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.40 | Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 1% | 22% | -28% | 3% | ||
| Idle Minimum * | 4.2 | 2.3 45% | 3.2 24% | 5.16 ? -23% | 5.44 ? -30% | |
| Idle Average * | 7.4 | 10.3 -39% | 7 5% | 8.51 ? -15% | 8.27 ? -12% | |
| Idle Maximum * | 9 | 11 -22% | 8.9 1% | 14.6 ? -62% | 10.8 ? -20% | |
| Load Average * | 78 | 77 1% | 47.6 39% | 76.4 ? 2% | 46.7 ? 40% | |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 94.2 | 68 28% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 108 | 118 -9% | 63.1 42% | 151.4 ? -40% | 65.4 ? 39% |
* ... smaller is better
| Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 82 Wh | Microsoft Surface Book 2 15 i7-8650U, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 86 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 20 i9-9980HK, Radeon Pro Vega 20, 83 Wh | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T i7-10510U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 71 Wh | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 60 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 8% | 34% | 0% | -13% | -2% | |
| Reader / Idle | 969 | 1169 21% | 1112 ? 15% | |||
| H.264 | 776 | 915 18% | 669 -14% | 793 2% | 769 ? -1% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 512 | 635 24% | 687 34% | 566 11% | 636 24% | 567 ? 11% |
| Load | 179 | 145 -19% | 149 -17% | 64 -64% | 121.7 ? -32% |
Pro
+ Boa qualidade de construção e materiais
+ Sólido mecanismo de acoplamento e unidade base
+ Hardware poderoso
+ Muito Fino e leve para um tablet de 15 polegadas
+ USB 3.1 Gen. 2
+ Bom leitor de cartões SD
+ Qualidade da Webcam acima da média
+ Excelente tela táctil 4K
+ Desempenho 3D mais veloz que o do seu predecessor
+ Tablet de alto desempenho
+ Silencioso até mesmo sob uso intenso
+ Alto-falantes decentes
Contra
- A dobradiça torna o dispositivo desnecessariamente grosso e suscetível a sujeira
- A manutenção é essencialmente impossível
- O Thunderbolt 3 requer um dock caro
- Sem portas USB na unidade de tablet
- Apenas 58% de AdobeRGB (relevante para a edição profissional de fotos)
- O SSD é mais lento que o do modelo anterior
- Sem melhoria no desempenho da CPU em relação ao Surface Book 2
- Leve afogamento do desempenho da GPU
- Desenvolvimento significativo de calor, mesmo quando no modo inativo
- Os tempos de duração dos tablets são bastante curtos
Veredicto - Excelente conversível com uma desvantagem
O Surface Book 3 15 da Microsoft é um dispositivo premium que, graças ao seu design único, quase não tem concorrência. Onde mais você pode obter um tablet tão poderoso que também pode se transformar em um portátil com hardware ainda melhor (GPU). Mesmo o próprio tablet é mais rápido que muitos portáteis básicos.
A Microsoft otimizou ainda mais sua família de dispositivos com melhorias substanciais em diversas áreas, como o aumento do nível de volume, por exemplo. A excelente tela de 4K, a poderosa combinação CPU/GPU e a qualidade de construção, bem como seu sólido mecanismo de acoplamento, continuam a surpreender. Da mesma forma, os dispositivos de entrada são sólidos.
No entanto, esta não é uma atualização rigorosa: Um downgrade significativo de SSD nesta classe de preço é desconcertante. Ainda não há Thunderbolt e a Microsoft está tentando empurrar o dock muito caro para seus clientes. Além disso, gostaríamos de ter visto uma porta USB tipo C diretamente na unidade tablet e sua bateria também poderia ter sido maior.
Com o último Surface Book 15, a Microsoft tem feito a maioria das coisas bem. No entanto, não há nenhuma razão real para atualizar do previous model, o que tem até algumas vantagens em relação ao modelo mais novo.
Isso nos deixa com a questão de saber se o modelo mais novo é ainda melhor do que o anterior Surface Book 15. A interface USB foi atualizada da geração 1 par a. 2da geração, o nível de ruído sob carga caiu significativamente e houve também melhorias no desempenho 3D. Enquanto isso, o desempenho da CPU permanece inalterado na melhor das hipóteses e, como mencionado anteriormente, o SSD é mais lento. Embora o Surface Book 3 tenha uma ligeira vantagem, existem muito poucas boas razões para atualizar a partir de um Surface Book 2. Para quem pode pagar, o Surface Book 3 15 ainda é uma boa compra.
Microsoft Surface Book 3 15
-
06/29/2020 v7
Christian Hintze
Convertible - Médio equilibrado
Pricecompare
