Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X)
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) (MacBook Pro 15 2018 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-8850H 6 x 2.6 - 4.3 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
AMD Radeon Pro 560X
Memória
16 GB
, DDR4-2400, soldada, até 32 GB
Pantalha
15.40 polegadas 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 221 PPI, APPA040, IPS, TrueTone, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Disco rígido
Apple SSD AP0512, 512 GB
peso
1.83 kg, Suprimento de energia: 369 g
Preço
3299 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
APPA040 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 533 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 492 cd/m² Minimum: 4.7 cd/m²iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 524 cd/m²
Contraste: 1333:1 (Preto: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
86.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) APPA040, , 2880x1800, 15.40 | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) APPA031, , 2880x1800, 15.40 | Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD LQ156D1, , 3840x2160, 15.60 | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 LGD05C0, , 1920x1080, 15.60 | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 LGD05C0, , 1920x1080, 15.60 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | -10% | -22% | -22% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 98.7 | 97.9 -1% | 79.1 -20% | 63.6 -36% | 64.4 -35% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 99.9 0% | 98.8 -1% | 93.8 -6% | 93.4 -7% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 86.6 | 85.9 -1% | 79.2 -9% | 64.9 -25% | 65.5 -24% |
| Response Times | -6% | -36% | 63% | 66% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43.2 ? | 48 ? -11% | 46.4 ? -7% | 16.8 ? 61% | 13.6 ? 69% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 31.2 ? | 33.8 ? -8% | 32 ? -3% | 11.2 ? 64% | 12 ? 62% |
| PWM Frequency | 117000 ? | 119000 ? 2% | 980 ? -99% | ||
| Screen | -19% | -137% | -7% | -28% | |
| Brightness middle | 520 | 545 5% | 494 -5% | 313 -40% | 304.3 -41% |
| Brightness | 492 | 523 6% | 457 -7% | 300 -39% | 293 -40% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 86 -2% | 88 0% | 78 -11% | 80 -9% |
| Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.44 -13% | 0.34 13% | 0.33 15% | 0.38 3% |
| Contrast | 1333 | 1239 -7% | 1453 9% | 948 -29% | 801 -40% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 1.6 -33% | 5.2 -333% | 1.29 -8% | 1.79 -49% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.3 | 3.8 -65% | 17.5 -661% | 2.04 11% | 3.69 -60% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 1.9 -46% | 2.7 -108% | 0.69 47% | 1.1 15% |
| Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.26 97% | 2.1 105% | 2.43 91% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 6738 96% | 6834 95% | 7038 92% | 6550 99% | 6665 98% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 71.2 | 60 | 59.8 | ||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98.8 | 94 | 92.8 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -9% /
-12% | -61% /
-88% | 11% /
0% | 5% /
-12% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 31.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 43.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Intel Core i7-8850H; macOS Software Update: Ø1006 (962.51-1065.02)
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Intel Core i7-8850H; macOS Software Update 2: Ø1031 (1009-1058)
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Intel Core i7-8850H; macOS Catalina 10.15.5: Ø901 (863-971)
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) Intel Core i7-8850H; macOS: Ø832 (773-940)
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) Intel Core i7-7700HQ; OS X: Ø731 (729-733)
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) Intel Core i7-7700HQ; Win10: Ø724 (704.77-731.97)
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh Intel Core i5-8300H: Ø812 (765.87-840.02)
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD Intel Core i7-8750H; Undervolting: Ø1168 (1123.47-1219.85)
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1012 (980.27-1215.12)
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.7 °C / 90.9 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.9 °C / -7.1 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.7 °C / 90.9 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.9 °C / -7.1 F).
A atualização deste ano se trata principalmente sobre o desempenho. Finalmente, há uma opção para 32 GB de RAM e as atuais CPUs hexa-core da Intel (Coffee Lake) também estão disponíveis na máquina multimídia de 15 polegadas da Apple. O novo modelo é mais rápido que o predecessor, mas você não pode usar o potencial da CPU, especialmente sob cargas de trabalho contínuas. Nossos testes mostram que a solução de resfriamento não é potente o suficiente ou a Apple não quer acelerar os ventiladores em favor do ruído do sistema, respectivamente, mas vamos verificar isso.
Tudo isso não é realmente interessante para usuários comuns que simplesmente não precisam de um desempenho estável da CPU, mas eles devem usar o processador básico de qualquer maneira. A Apple - pelo menos em teoria - também poderia ter vendido um modelo menos caro com uma CPU quad-core atual. Os usuários avançados, no entanto, que podem até pensar no processador Core i9 opcional, ficarão decepcionados com nossos resultados iniciais, especialmente em comparação com o desempenho superior dos concorrentes (como o Dell XPS 15 9570).
Pricecompare
