Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Conversível Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6

Um nicho próprio. A Panasonic é o fabricante do robusto Toughbooks feito para os militares e utilizado em lugares de construção. O CF-XZ6 supostamente deve atrair clientes empresariais normais que normalmente optariam um Surface, Latitude, ThinkPad ou EliteBook. Descubra porque o Toughbook não conseguiu sair do seu nicho em nossa análise.

Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6 (Toughbook CF Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-7300U
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 620
Memória
8192 MB 
, DDR3, soldada, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
12 polegadas 3:2, 2160 x 1440 pixel 216 PPI, 10 pontos, native pen support, Semi-Matte Beschichtung, IPS LED, Brilhante: sim, detachable screen
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ, 256 GB 
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
4 USB 3.0, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Áudio combinado de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Leitor de cartões SDXC, Sensores: Rotationssensor
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1, EM7305, LTE
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 22 x 288 x 223
Bateria
76 Wh Lítio-Ion, removeable, 2 baterias de 4 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 2 megapixel + IR camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono, Teclado: Teclado branco de 6 filas, Iluminação do Teclado: não, Microsoft Office Trial, 36 Meses Garantia
peso
1.18 kg, Suprimento de energia: 335 g
Preço
2384 Euro

 

sidebar_1-multi

Size Comparison

right: USB Type-A 3.0, HDMI, battery switch, VGA, USB Type-C 3.1 Gen. 1 (on the tablet), Ethernet, Kensington Lock
right: USB Type-A 3.0, HDMI, battery switch, VGA, USB Type-C 3.1 Gen. 1 (on the tablet), Ethernet, Kensington Lock
left: combined audio (on the tablet), power supply, SD card slot, 2 x USB Type-A 3.0, NanoSIM-Slot (on the tablet)
left: combined audio (on the tablet), power supply, SD card slot, 2 x USB Type-A 3.0, NanoSIM-Slot (on the tablet)
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Microsoft Surface Book 2
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
159.2 MB/s ∼100% +12%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
142.6 MB/s ∼90%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
79.8 MB/s ∼50% -44%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
72.62 MB/s ∼46% -49%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 64 GB)
53.8 MB/s ∼34% -62%
Dell Latitude 7285
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
29.7 MB/s ∼19% -79%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
239 MB/s ∼100%
Microsoft Surface Book 2
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
234.4 MB/s ∼98% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
93.77 MB/s ∼39% -61%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
87.4 MB/s ∼37% -63%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 64 GB)
86.5 MB/s ∼36% -64%
Dell Latitude 7285
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
30.5 (min: 29.7) MB/s ∼13% -87%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell Latitude 7285
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
611 MBit/s ∼100% +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
586 MBit/s ∼96% +14%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
569 MBit/s ∼93% +11%
Microsoft Surface Book 2
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
515 MBit/s ∼84% 0%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
514 MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
670 MBit/s ∼100%
Dell Latitude 7285
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
515 MBit/s ∼77% -23%
Microsoft Surface Book 2
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
498 MBit/s ∼74% -26%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
440 MBit/s ∼66% -34%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
246 MBit/s ∼37% -63%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 694 Hz ≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 694 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 694 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10377 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

sidebar_3-multi
519
cd/m²
556
cd/m²
552
cd/m²
479
cd/m²
565
cd/m²
565
cd/m²
474
cd/m²
577
cd/m²
556
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 577 cd/m² Médio: 538.1 cd/m² Minimum: 6.8 cd/m²
iluminação: 82 %
iluminação com acumulador: 565 cd/m²
Contraste: 1413:1 (Preto: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.06 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 6.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
70% sRGB (Argyll) 44% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.25
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6
Semi-Matte Beschichtung, , 2160x1440, 12
Microsoft Surface Book 2
Panasonic MEI96A2 , , 3000x2000, 13.5
Dell Latitude 7285
SHP1482 (LQ123Z1), , 2880x1920, 12.3
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
LG Display LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1824, 12.3
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
LSN120QL01L01, , 2160x1440, 12
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Samsung SDC4A49, , 2716x1824, 12.3
Response Times
-18%
6%
1037%
-6%
72%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
39 (21, 18)
52.8 (25.2, 27.6)
-35%
44 (19.6, 24.4)
-13%
37 (16, 21)
5%
28.4 (15.2, 13.2)
27%
45.6 (23.6, 22)
-17%
Response Time Black / White *
30 (18, 12)
30 (16.4, 13.6)
-0%
30.4 (15.6, 14.8)
-1%
25 (13, 12)
17%
22.8 (13.6, 9.2)
24%
21.6 (9.2, 12.4)
28%
PWM Frequency
694 (90)
922.1 (20)
33%
22130 (55)
3089%
221.2 (49)
-68%
2119 (50)
205%
Screen
29%
18%
9%
-3%
18%
Brightness middle
565
385
-32%
531
-6%
482
-15%
388.1
-31%
443
-22%
Brightness
538
372
-31%
490
-9%
466
-13%
344
-36%
446
-17%
Brightness Distribution
82
89
9%
86
5%
92
12%
78
-5%
88
7%
Black Level *
0.4
0.21
47%
0.37
7%
0.395
1%
0.39
2%
0.41
-3%
Contrast
1413
1833
30%
1435
2%
1220
-14%
995
-30%
1080
-24%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.06
1.6
68%
3.5
31%
4
21%
4.6
9%
2.6
49%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.1
4.5
44%
6.2
23%
7.2
11%
9.1
-12%
4
51%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.4
1.5
77%
4.7
27%
5.7
11%
6.1
5%
3
53%
Gamma
2.25 107%
2.22 108%
2.04 118%
2.28 105%
2.07 116%
2.38 101%
CCT
5794 112%
6502 100%
6581 99%
7950 82%
7104 91%
6780 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
44
64
45%
67.6
54%
62
41%
59
34%
62.6
42%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
70
95.9
37%
99.8
43%
96
37%
91
30%
98
40%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
6% / 22%
12% / 15%
523% / 246%
-5% / -4%
45% / 30%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42 ms).
HWiNFO
HWiNFO
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Memory
CPU-Z Memory
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
LatencyMon
LatencyMon
 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Book 2
Intel Core i7-8650U
177 Points ∼100% +28%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
163 Points ∼92% +18%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6
Intel Core i5-7300U
138 Points ∼78%
Dell Latitude 7285
Intel Core i5-7Y57
133 Points ∼75% -4%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Intel Core i5-7200U
127 Points ∼72% -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Core i5-7Y54
115 Points ∼65% -17%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Book 2
Intel Core i7-8650U
673 Points ∼100% +105%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
410 (min: 335.35, max: 409.45) Points ∼61% +25%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6
Intel Core i5-7300U
328 Points ∼49%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Intel Core i5-7200U
322 Points ∼48% -2%
Dell Latitude 7285
Intel Core i5-7Y57
273 Points ∼41% -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Core i5-7Y54
234 Points ∼35% -29%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
328 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
34.98 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
138 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Microsoft Surface Book 2
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4522 (min: 4500, max: 4528) Points ∼100% 0%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
4503 Points ∼100%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
4431 Points ∼98% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4288 Points ∼95% -5%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4036 Points ∼89% -10%
Dell Latitude 7285
HD Graphics 615, 7Y57, Toshiba KBG20ZMS256G
3911 Points ∼86% -13%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
4095 Points ∼100% +21%
Microsoft Surface Book 2
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3694 (min: 3691, max: 3696) Points ∼90% +9%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
3386 Points ∼83%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3289 Points ∼80% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3092 Points ∼76% -9%
Dell Latitude 7285
HD Graphics 615, 7Y57, Toshiba KBG20ZMS256G
3073 Points ∼75% -9%
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Microsoft Surface Book 2
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4342 (min: 4211, max: 4356) Points ∼100% +100%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
3014 Points ∼69% +39%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2246 Points ∼52% +3%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
2174 Points ∼50%
Dell Latitude 7285
HD Graphics 615, 7Y57, Toshiba KBG20ZMS256G
1981 Points ∼46% -9%
Productivity
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
6665 Points ∼100% +8%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
6147 Points ∼92%
Microsoft Surface Book 2
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5819 (min: 5653, max: 5995) Points ∼87% -5%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5104 Points ∼77% -17%
Dell Latitude 7285
HD Graphics 615, 7Y57, Toshiba KBG20ZMS256G
4917 Points ∼74% -20%
Essentials
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
8076 Points ∼100% +18%
Microsoft Surface Book 2
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7659 (min: 7643, max: 7746) Points ∼95% +12%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7276 Points ∼90% +7%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
6820 Points ∼84%
Dell Latitude 7285
HD Graphics 615, 7Y57, Toshiba KBG20ZMS256G
6632 Points ∼82% -3%
Score
Microsoft Surface Book 2
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4119 (min: 4106, max: 4190) Points ∼100% +28%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
3909 Points ∼95% +21%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
3226 Points ∼78%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3146 Points ∼76% -2%
Dell Latitude 7285
HD Graphics 615, 7Y57, Toshiba KBG20ZMS256G
2876 Points ∼70% -11%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3386 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4503 pontos
Ajuda
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6
Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
Microsoft Surface Book 2
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Dell Latitude 7285
Toshiba KBG20ZMS256G
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
46%
38%
73%
90%
129%
Write 4k QD32
273.9
337.08
23%
253
-8%
421.48
54%
259
-5%
472.5
73%
Read 4k QD32
307
465.5
52%
357.7
17%
485.58
58%
247.9
-19%
398.3
30%
Write 4k
93
148.47
60%
99.07
7%
136.27
47%
120
29%
145.4
56%
Read 4k
35.75
43.64
22%
45.26
27%
53.64
50%
52.34
46%
56.9
59%
Write 512
355.6
337.86
-5%
487.9
37%
791.87
123%
869
144%
844.4
137%
Read 512
423.5
654.05
54%
755.8
78%
227.5
-46%
697.5
65%
1235
192%
Write Seq
404.2
341.2
-16%
587.4
45%
960.7
138%
1259
211%
1261
212%
Read Seq
499.9
1370.2
174%
1017
103%
1307.9
162%
1739
248%
1875
275%
Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
Sequential Read: 499.9 MB/s
Sequential Write: 404.2 MB/s
512K Read: 423.5 MB/s
512K Write: 355.6 MB/s
4K Read: 35.75 MB/s
4K Write: 93 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 307 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 273.9 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Microsoft Surface Book 2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-8650U
7483 (min: 7472, max: 7485) Points ∼100% +430%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, Intel Core i7-7660U
2493 Points ∼33% +76%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1510 Points ∼20% +7%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7300U
1413 Points ∼19%
Dell Latitude 7285
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y57
1327 Points ∼18% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
1161 Points ∼16% -18%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Microsoft Surface Book 2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-8650U
5787 Points ∼100% +622%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, Intel Core i7-7660U
1418 Points ∼25% +77%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
933 Points ∼16% +16%
Dell Latitude 7285
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y57
866 Points ∼15% +8%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7300U
802 Points ∼14%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
728 Points ∼13% -9%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Microsoft Surface Book 2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Intel Core i7-8650U
29376 Points ∼100% +343%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, Intel Core i7-7660U
11264 Points ∼38% +70%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
7334 Points ∼25% +11%
Dell Latitude 7285
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y57
6862 Points ∼23% +4%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7300U
6625 Points ∼23%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
6164 Points ∼21% -7%
3DMark 11 Performance
1552 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5469 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
734 pontos
Ajuda
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 43.3124.5fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 16.08fps
Civilization VI (2016) 17.28fps

Barulho

Ocioso
30.5 / 30.5 / 30.5 dB
Carga
31.9 / 32.6 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.633.533.834.434.433.62535.133.33538.33935.13139.539.442.241.142.239.54031.933.233.836.635.431.95033.635.63537.737.833.66335.128.928.630.229.635.18028.126.226.727.328.828.110027.625.826.327.228.327.61252626.125.82725.62616025.32424.224.423.325.320023.923.623.223.422.723.925021.721.822.423.121.521.731521.420.821.42120.821.440021.221.521.120.620.421.250019.521.220.819.819.319.563019.520.119.71918.519.580020.122.220.418.418.220.1100021.524.622.118.217.921.5125020.428.9211817.920.4160020.524.321.81817.720.5200019.92320.81817.819.9250019.223.12017.917.719.2315019.323.720.41818.119.3400019.122.820.518.218.219.1500018.922.319.518.518.318.9630018.720.618.918.518.518.7800018.819.518.918.618.618.81000018.618.818.718.618.618.61250018.618.618.618.518.418.61600018.618.618.618.618.518.6SPL31.935.532.630.830.631.9N1.72.21.81.51.41.7median 19.9Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6median 22.3median 20.8median 18.6median 18.5median 19.9Delta1.81.71.41.81.81.830.829.629.9322830.828.932.63434.334.631.432.632.43028.928.529.228.527.127.626.427.727.927.927.926.926.828.428.128.427.827.327.730.925.727.126.824.926.527.52725.627.825.92525.526.126.328.324.32627.528.926.828.226.32424.224.22323.424.823.922.823.521.92324.524.222.322.422.322.921.92324.123.621.721.221.720.822.425.523.321.62120.219.920.729.121.319.619.418.818.618.426.122.220.419.518.118.117.927.822.420.918.917.417.417.730.621.818.81816.917.217.131.122.919.718.616.51716.832.724.821.218.417.316.816.634.926.922.420.218.316.916.337.127.523.820.818.417.416.537.629.424.220.417.818.116.239.327.722.318.617.817.916.338.328.321.418.617.617.216.840.22518.51817.81817.137.122.318.618.418.118.617.339.620.31819.819.320.417.937.118.617.918.418.218.417.929.818.21818.318.518.717.826.718.318.220.520.520.618.223.337.833.431.430.230.229.4492.61.81.51.41.41.36.3median 23.3Microsoft Surface Book 2median 21.2median 19.5median 18.3median 18.4median 17.8median 30.62.31.81.41.31.62.25.3hearing rangehide median Fan Noise
Carga Máxima
 24.4 °C30.9 °C35 °C 
 25.3 °C24.1 °C37.6 °C 
 33.8 °C33.1 °C34.7 °C 
Máximo: 37.6 °C
Médio: 31 °C
38 °C30.7 °C25.2 °C
38.2 °C34.7 °C25.8 °C
31.2 °C31.7 °C26.6 °C
Máximo: 38.2 °C
Médio: 3.5 °C
alimentação elétrica  39.3 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.334.434.32533.83933.83138.942.238.94032.235.432.25031.437.831.4633229.6328026.728.826.710027.528.327.512526.225.626.216025.223.325.220023.722.723.725022.521.522.531522.820.822.840022.420.422.450026.819.326.863032.118.532.180043.418.243.4100049.217.949.2125056.317.956.3160051.817.751.8200050.717.850.7250051.417.751.431505318.153400054.218.254.2500058.818.358.8630063.118.563.1800059.718.659.71000055.918.655.91250050.418.450.41600046.818.546.8SPL67.930.667.9N18.81.418.8median 49.2Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6median 18.5median 49.2Delta14.31.814.330.833.932.632.627.129.226.928.627.728.427.527.226.127.526.832.523.440.824.543.22348.822.454.920.757.818.456.417.958.717.759.117.160.716.860.116.659.716.361.116.564.716.262.916.366.516.86217.165.217.359.717.95517.951.617.846.718.24929.474.21.333.1median 17.8Microsoft Surface Book 2median 58.72.25.1hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (63.07 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 10.4% lower than median
(-) | mids are not linear (16.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (40.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 97% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Microsoft Surface Book 2 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight / 0.7 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3.15 / 6 / 6.3 Watt
Carga midlight 21 / 23 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6
7300U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ, IPS LED, 2160x1440, 12
Microsoft Surface Book 2
8650U, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.5
Dell Latitude 7285
7Y57, HD Graphics 615, Toshiba KBG20ZMS256G, IPS LED, 2880x1920, 12.3
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 2160x1440, 12
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 2716x1824, 12.3
Power Consumption
-169%
-61%
-70%
-13%
-67%
Idle Minimum *
3.15
4.7
-49%
6.6
-110%
4.2
-33%
5
-59%
4.1
-30%
Idle Average *
6
10.6
-77%
9.3
-55%
10.1
-68%
6.3
-5%
9.2
-53%
Idle Maximum *
6.3
12.3
-95%
10.2
-62%
14
-122%
7.8
-24%
11.1
-76%
Load Average *
21
81
-286%
25.1
-20%
37.4
-78%
19.5
7%
33.8
-61%
Load Maximum *
23
100.3
-336%
36.1
-57%
34
-48%
19.6
15%
49.2
-114%
Witcher 3 ultra *
97
38.1

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
22h 05min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge)
14h 01min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 50min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 08min
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6
7300U, HD Graphics 620, 76 Wh
Microsoft Surface Book 2
8650U, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 75 Wh
Dell Latitude 7285
7Y57, HD Graphics 615, 54 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 45 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 37 Wh
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 47 Wh
Battery Runtime
6%
-35%
-32%
-42%
-42%
Reader / Idle
1325
1469
11%
1030
-22%
662
-50%
833
-37%
H.264
710
933
31%
369
-48%
614
-14%
377
-47%
WiFi v1.3
841
663
-21%
391
-54%
489
-42%
441
-48%
378
-55%
Load
188
190
1%
162
-14%
112
-40%
134
-29%
138
-27%
Witcher 3 ultra
230
115

Pro

+ Alto brilho da tela
+ Tela com superfície semi mate
+ Ethernet e VGA disponíveis
+ Muito boas durações da bateria
+ A segunda bateria permite uma alta flexibilidade
+ Módulo WWAN
+ Carcaça robusta de magnésio

Contra

- Embaçamento visível na LCD
- Tela Cobertura baixa dos espaços de cores e PWM
- Teclado desconfortável com layout estranho
- Touchpad pequeno e de uso difícil
- Alto falante mono ruim
- SSD SATA III em um portátil de £1850
- Fraquezas no acabamento
- Ruído da bobina
- Posicionamento ruim das portas
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6, test unit provided by Panasonic.
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6, test unit provided by Panasonic.

O Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6 é um desmontável interessante que possui alguns recursos excelentes - mas também algumas fraquezas e falhas grandes.

Se você der uma olhada na duração da bateria ou no brilho da tela da tela semi mate, por exemplo, terá a impressão de estar olhando para um portátil de primeira classe. Nenhum concorrente consegue competir com o Toughbook nestes aspectos. Outra vantagem é a sua flexibilidade: O Toughbook é claramente o melhor no segmento de desmontáveis ou  tablets 2-em-1. Uma porta VGA e Ethernet ainda é essencial para um portátil empresarial e a bateria substituível lhe oferece a opção de ter durações ainda melhores. E apesar de que o Toughbook tem uma carcaça de metal pequena e leve, se sene muito robusto. O módulo WWAN incluído mantém você conectado em qualquer lugar.

Tão bom quanto tudo isso soa: As fraquezas não são facilmente ignoradas. Começa com a tela, cujo brilho diminui tão fortemente na borda esquerda que você pode vê-lo a olho nu. A tela também tem PWM e a cobertura de espaço de cores é simplesmente ruim para um portátil dessa faixa de preços. Mas não é apenas o dispositivo de saída principal que tem alguns problemas. Os dois principais dispositivos de entrada são bastante decepcionantes também: O teclado tem um layout muito peculiar, que causou vários erros de digitação e o touchpad parece ter chegado na década errada com sua pequena área de toque. Apenas estes dois pontos tornam quase impossível imaginar este dispositivo como uma ferramenta de trabalho. Considerando tudo isso, quase podemos perdoar a má qualidade do alto-falante mono, embora normalmente esperássemos mais de um dispositivo que custa £1850. Esta não é a única área em que a Panasonic tentou poupar algum dinheiro. O SSD pequeno de 256 GB, por exemplo, é apenas uma unidade flash SATA-III. Por último, mas não menos importante, devemos mencionar alguns problemas de qualidade. O acabamento da carcaça, por exemplo, não é boa em algumas áreas e, ocasionalmente, ouvimos o ruído da bobina.

Não é para as massas. A qualidade do Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6 é muito inconsistente para realmente competir com os dispositivos desmontáveis de outros grandes fabricantes. Provavelmente permanecerá em seu nicho.

Fizemos uma pergunta na introdução: Nicho ou mercado de massa? A resposta é clara para o Toughbook - definitivamente nicho. O usuário médio não ficará feliz com o Toughbook, portanto não podemos dar uma recomendação geral.

Mas se você é um usuário que precisa das características especiais do Toughbook, como uma bateria trocável, alto brilho da tela ou as portas legadas em um dispositivo destacável, provavelmente não encontrará nada melhor que o Toughbook CF-XZ6, apesar de suas fraquezas. Só podemos recomendar o dispositivo para este grupo muito específico - e mesmo assim, apenas com uma palavra de cautela. Em qualquer caso, você deve certificar-se de que a distribuição do brilho da tela seja mais uniforme do que em nossa unidade de teste - esta falha em um dispositivo comprado é definitivamente um motivo para reclamar.

Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6 - 01/11/2018 v6
Benjamin Herzig

Acabamento
83 / 98 → 85%
Teclado
68%
Mouse
69%
Conectividade
66 / 80 → 82%
Peso
73 / 35-78 → 88%
Bateria
97%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
56 / 68 → 82%
Desempenho da aplicação
86 / 87 → 99%
Temperatura
91%
Ruído
94%
Audio
36 / 91 → 40%
Camera
32 / 85 → 37%
Médio
72%
83%
Convertible - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Conversível Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6
Benjamin Herzig, 2018-01-18 (Update: 2018-02- 1)