Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Reforçado Panasonic Toughbook CF-54 (i5-7300U)

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 10/10/2018

Tough guy. Forte em todos os aspectos, exceto um. O Toughbook CF-54 é um dos portáteis robustos mais finos e portáteis em sua categoria de tamanho para torná-lo uma excelente opção para trabalho de campo. Infelizmente, um enorme espinho impede que seja o companheiro ideal para uso em exteriores.

Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM (Toughbook CF Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-7300U
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 620, Análises do: 300 MHz, Memoría: 1067 MHz, DDR4, 21.20.16.4821
Memória
32768 MB 
, DDR4-2666, 1066.7 MHz, 15-15-15-35, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
14 polegadas 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel 112 PPI, B140XTN, AUO2E3C, TN LED, Dell P/N: 6WM60, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Seagate BarraCuda Compute 1TB ST1000LM048, 1024 GB 
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: Leitor SDXC
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 30.5 x 345.5 x 271.8
Bateria
33 Wh, 3050 mAh Lítio-Ion, removeable
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 36 Meses Garantia, ruggedized
peso
1.906 kg, Suprimento de energia: 537 g
Preço
1400 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Left: Removable 2.5-inch SATA III slot, Kensington Lock
Left: Removable 2.5-inch SATA III slot, Kensington Lock
Right: Wi-Fi toggle, 3.5 mm audio, SD reader, 2x USB 3.0, RJ-45
Right: Wi-Fi toggle, 3.5 mm audio, SD reader, 2x USB 3.0, RJ-45
Rear: USB 3.0, HDMI, Mini-SIM,
Rear: USB 3.0, HDMI, Mini-SIM,
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
149.7 MB/s ∼100%
Dell Latitude 7490
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
146.29 MB/s ∼98% -2%
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
136.2 MB/s ∼91% -9%
Getac S410
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81.1 MB/s ∼54% -46%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
72.8 MB/s ∼49% -51%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-33
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.5 MB/s ∼18% -82%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
237.5 MB/s ∼100% +32%
Dell Latitude 7490
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
217.93 MB/s ∼92% +21%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
179.6 MB/s ∼76%
Getac S410
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85.5 MB/s ∼36% -52%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
82.7 MB/s ∼35% -54%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-33
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
29.1 MB/s ∼12% -84%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Getac S410
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
650 MBit/s ∼100% +3%
Dell Latitude 7490
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
635 MBit/s ∼98% +1%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
630 MBit/s ∼97%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
624 MBit/s ∼96% -1%
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
492 MBit/s ∼76% -22%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-33
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
197 MBit/s ∼30% -69%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
661 MBit/s ∼100% +32%
Getac S410
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
538 MBit/s ∼81% +7%
Dell Latitude 7490
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
524 MBit/s ∼79% +4%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
502 MBit/s ∼76%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
455 MBit/s ∼69% -9%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-33
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
223 MBit/s ∼34% -56%
187.8
cd/m²
180
cd/m²
167.7
cd/m²
179.9
cd/m²
174.5
cd/m²
150.2
cd/m²
155.7
cd/m²
151
cd/m²
132.5
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 187.8 cd/m² Médio: 164.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.13 cd/m²
iluminação: 71 %
iluminação com acumulador: 174.5 cd/m²
Contraste: 291:1 (Preto: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 12.05 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 4.34
ΔE Greyscale 14.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
56.2% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 35.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 1.4
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
B140XTN, AUO2E3C, TN LED, 14, 1366x768
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
Sharp LQ140K1, IPS, 14, 1366x768
Dell Latitude 7490
AU Optronics AU0223D, IPS, 14, 1920x1080
Panasonic Toughbook CF-33
Manufacturer unknown, ID: TMA1200, IPS, 12, 2160x1440
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
ID: BOE06E8, Name: BOE HF NV150FHB-N31, IPS, 15, 1920x1080
Getac S410
CMN N140BGE-E33, TN PED, 14, 1366x768
Response Times
-29%
-50%
-19%
-39%
12%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
43.2 (16.8, 26.4)
43 (20, 23)
-0%
48.4 (27.6, 20.8)
-12%
30 (11, 19)
31%
46 (25.2, 20.8)
-6%
41.2 (21.6, 19.6)
5%
Response Time Black / White *
17.2 (11.2, 6)
27 (17, 10)
-57%
32.4 (18.8, 13.6)
-88%
29 (11, 18)
-69%
29.6 (16.4, 13.2)
-72%
14 (9.6, 4.4)
19%
PWM Frequency
200 (20)
685
2976 (91)
877.2 (99)
Screen
68%
73%
219%
114%
17%
Brightness middle
174.5
493
183%
328.2
88%
571
227%
558.2
220%
265.1
52%
Brightness
164
456
178%
305
86%
555
238%
528
222%
246
50%
Brightness Distribution
71
81
14%
87
23%
89
25%
92
30%
81
14%
Black Level *
0.6
0.53
12%
0.37
38%
0.11
82%
0.46
23%
0.58
3%
Contrast
291
930
220%
887
205%
5191
1684%
1213
317%
457
57%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
12.05
11.08
8%
3.82
68%
22.7
-88%
4.41
63%
14.24
-18%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
27.5
15.11
45%
5.58
80%
34.14
-24%
10.91
60%
26.66
3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.34
3.5
19%
3.94
9%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
14.8
11.99
19%
3
80%
13.6
8%
6.6
55%
14.2
4%
Gamma
1.4 157%
4.03 55%
2.36 93%
5.51 40%
2.19 100%
2.03 108%
CCT
14529 45%
10872 60%
6962 93%
6998 93%
7615 85%
17152 38%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
35.7
36
1%
58
62%
42.5
19%
61.3
72%
38.7
8%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
56.2
56
0%
88
57%
67.02
19%
97.2
73%
61
9%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
20% / 52%
12% / 54%
100% / 179%
38% / 88%
15% / 17%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
17.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.2 ms rise
↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.8 ms rise
↘ 26.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8629 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360Tooltip
; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø344 (340.23-352.17)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Getac S410
Intel Core i7-8550U
163 Points ∼77% +30%
Dell Latitude 15 3590-K8JP
Intel Core i7-8550U
161 Points ∼76% +29%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
146 Points ∼69% +17%
HP 15-da0405ng
Intel Core i5-8250U
144 Points ∼68% +15%
Average Intel Core i5-7300U
  (125 - 145, n=9)
140 Points ∼66% +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
134 Points ∼63% +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points ∼61% +3%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
Intel Core i5-7300U
125 Points ∼59%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
108 Points ∼51% -14%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
65 Points ∼31% -48%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Intel Atom x7-Z8750
38.9 Points ∼18% -69%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell Latitude 15 3590-K8JP
Intel Core i7-8550U
572 Points ∼18% +66%
HP 15-da0405ng
Intel Core i5-8250U
568 Points ∼18% +65%
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
553 Points ∼18% +61%
Getac S410
Intel Core i7-8550U
498 Points ∼16% +45%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
Intel Core i7-7500U
367 Points ∼12% +7%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
Intel Core i5-7300U
344 Points ∼11%
Average Intel Core i5-7300U
  (328 - 369, n=9)
342 Points ∼11% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB
Intel Core i5-7200U
331 Points ∼11% -4%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
257 Points ∼8% -25%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
164 Points ∼5% -52%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Intel Atom x7-Z8750
133 (min: 112.75, max: 133) Points ∼4% -61%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
125 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
344 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
47.29 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3429 Points ∼44% +15%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-33
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Toshiba SG5 256GB THNSNK256GVN8
3329 Points ∼43% +12%
Average of class Office
  (803 - 4269, n=95)
3120 Points ∼40% +5%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Seagate BarraCuda Compute 1TB ST1000LM048
2972 Points ∼38%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2364 Points ∼30% -20%
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4029 Points ∼66% +3%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Seagate BarraCuda Compute 1TB ST1000LM048
3906 Points ∼64%
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Liteonit CV3-8D128
3655 Points ∼60% -6%
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3542 Points ∼58% -9%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-33
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Toshiba SG5 256GB THNSNK256GVN8
3518 Points ∼58% -10%
Average of class Office
  (1169 - 4458, n=352)
3007 Points ∼49% -23%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3906 pontos
Ajuda
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
Seagate BarraCuda Compute 1TB ST1000LM048
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR-81D2005JGE
Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
Dell G3 15 3579
Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172
HP 15-db0500ng
Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
Toshiba Tecra A50-C1510W10
Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630
Toshiba Satellite Radius 15 P50W-C-102
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
HD Tune Transfer Rate Average
---
98.8
84.4
-15%
97.5
-1%
98.5
0%
102.6
4%
70.5
-29%
Seagate BarraCuda Compute 1TB ST1000LM048
Velocidade de Transferência Mínima: 18.7 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Máxima: 137.8 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Média: 98.8 MB/s
Tempo de Acesso: 19.9 ms
Índice de Explosão: 156.3 MB/s
Uso da CPU: 5.7 %
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
3965 Points ∼22% +131%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
2975 Points ∼16% +73%
Lenovo Flex 5-1570 81CA000RUS
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, 8550U
2831 Points ∼16% +65%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U
2184 Points ∼12% +27%
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, PRO 2500U
1915 Points ∼11% +11%
Getac S410
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8550U
1758 Points ∼10% +2%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7300U
1720 Points ∼9%
Average Intel HD Graphics 620
  (814 - 1811, n=132)
1359 Points ∼7% -21%
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6300U
1239 Points ∼7% -28%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, 4415Y
1134 Points ∼6% -34%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Z8750
363 Points ∼2% -79%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
4369 Points ∼9% +159%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
2849 Points ∼6% +69%
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, PRO 2500U
2794 Points ∼5% +66%
Lenovo Flex 5-1570 81CA000RUS
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, 8550U
2592 Points ∼5% +54%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U
2493 Points ∼5% +48%
Getac S410
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8550U
1766 Points ∼3% +5%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7300U
1687 Points ∼3%
Average Intel HD Graphics 620
  (1067 - 1777, n=132)
1499 Points ∼3% -11%
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6300U
1369 Points ∼3% -19%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, 4415Y
1257 Points ∼2% -25%
Teclast Tbook 16 Power
Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell), Z8750
408 Points ∼1% -76%
3DMark 11 Performance
1873 pontos
Ajuda
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 54.733.528.9fps

Barulho

Ocioso
28.8 / 28.8 / 29.1 dB
Carga
31.3 / 40 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.3 dB(A)
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Seagate BarraCuda Compute 1TB ST1000LM048
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Liteonit CV3-8D128
Dell Latitude 7490
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Panasonic Toughbook CF-33
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Toshiba SG5 256GB THNSNK256GVN8
Getac S410
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, CUKUSA 1 TB SATA SSD Q0526A
Noise
1%
-1%
-2%
4%
off / environment *
28.3
30.2
-7%
28.2
-0%
30.3
-7%
28.4
-0%
Idle Minimum *
28.8
30.2
-5%
28.2
2%
30.3
-5%
28.4
1%
Idle Average *
28.8
30.2
-5%
28.2
2%
30.3
-5%
28.4
1%
Idle Maximum *
29.1
30.2
-4%
31.4
-8%
30.5
-5%
28.4
2%
Load Average *
31.3
30.2
4%
31.7
-1%
30.5
3%
30.3
3%
Load Maximum *
40
31.7
21%
41.2
-3%
36.6
8%
33.3
17%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 26.2 °C38.2 °C34.4 °C 
 26.4 °C29.6 °C31 °C 
 26 °C27.4 °C29.8 °C 
Máximo: 38.2 °C
Médio: 29.9 °C
38 °C35.8 °C29.8 °C
35.4 °C34 °C29.6 °C
31.2 °C28.4 °C28 °C
Máximo: 38 °C
Médio: 32.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  36 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.6 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 29.4 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the bottom side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 36.4 °C / 98 F, ranging from 22.3 to 71.6 °C for the class Office.
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 29.4 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.8 °C / 85.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-1.5 °C / -2.7 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.536.82534.835.2313532.34034.134.95032.533.36332.333.7803032.110029.129.212529.329.616028.428.320027.428.825027.928.431527.5324002638.650025.747.563024.852.580024.860.910002565.9125024.563.9160024.462.5200024.257.725002454.9315023.855400023.661.9500023.758.7630023.860.7800023.561.21000023.662.31250023.557.91600023.546.8SPL36.572.7N2.728.4median 24.5median 55Delta1.311.435.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoisePanasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VMApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (65.91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (17.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (36.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 97% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.19 / 0.58 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 4.4 / 6.3 / 6.5 Watt
Carga midlight 36.3 / 38.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
7300U, HD Graphics 620, Seagate BarraCuda Compute 1TB ST1000LM048, TN LED, 1366x768, 14
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
6300U, HD Graphics 520, Liteonit CV3-8D128, IPS, 1366x768, 14
Fujitsu LifeBook U748
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Dell Latitude 7490
8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Panasonic Toughbook CF-33
7300U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba SG5 256GB THNSNK256GVN8, IPS, 2160x1440, 12
Getac S410
8550U, UHD Graphics 620, CUKUSA 1 TB SATA SSD Q0526A, TN PED, 1366x768, 14
Power Consumption
-64%
-1%
-4%
23%
-12%
Idle Minimum *
4.4
6.8
-55%
3.33
24%
3.1
30%
3.6
18%
5.6
-27%
Idle Average *
6.3
13.4
-113%
6.9
-10%
6.5
-3%
4.6
27%
7.9
-25%
Idle Maximum *
6.5
16.8
-158%
8.2
-26%
7.6
-17%
5.15
21%
8.4
-29%
Load Average *
36.3
35.2
3%
29.4
19%
43
-18%
27
26%
32.8
10%
Load Maximum *
38.3
36.3
5%
43.4
-13%
43.8
-14%
29.2
24%
34.3
10%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5h 52min
Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM
7300U, HD Graphics 620, 33 Wh
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
6300U, HD Graphics 520, 97 Wh
Dell Latitude 7490
8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
Panasonic Toughbook CF-33
7300U, HD Graphics 620, 44 Wh
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5T-X01US
8550U, GeForce MX150, 75 Wh
Getac S410
8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 46.6 Wh
Battery Runtime
78%
59%
35%
80%
-11%
Reader / Idle
1116
1810
WiFi v1.3
352
628
78%
561
59%
475
35%
635
80%
312
-11%
Load
91
127

Pro

+ A luz de fundo vermelha do teclado é suave para os olhos
+ SODIMM acessível e módulos sem fio
+ Desempenho pleno com a bateria
+ Garantia padrão limitada de três anos
+ Fino e leve para sua categoria reforçada
+ Baia SATA III de 2,5 polegadas de fácil liberação
+ Silencioso durante tarefas leves
+ Leitor de cartões SD veloz

Contra

- Salto agudo no ruído do ventilador durante altas cargas de processamento
- Tela muito fraca na configuração básica
- Trackpad pequeno; teclas do mouse suaves
- A posição das portas poderia ser melhor
- Sem opções de CPU Kaby Lake-R
- Os alto-falantes poderiam ser mais potentes
In review: Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM. Test model provided by CUKUSA.com
In review: Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM. Test model provided by CUKUSA.com

A Panasonic oferece seu Toughbook CF-54 em uma gama muito ampla de SKUs para melhor atender a casos de uso específicos. Embora não possamos agradar todos e cada um, definitivamente podemos recomendar quais evitar e quais considerar. Mais especificamente, os usuários que pretendem usar o Toughbook CF-54 em ambientes externos ou em automóveis devem investir na tela de 1080p com retro iluminação de 1000 nits. Sem esse recurso, a tela será muito escura para a maioria dos cenários.

Além disso, se o desempenho gráfico não for uma preocupação, a configuração do Core i5-7300U deve ser suficiente, pois há um benefício mínimo entre o i5-7300U e o i7-7600U. Os dólares extras economizados seriam mais bem gastos em um SSD primário para um aumento mais tangível no desempenho geral.

Para futuras revisões, esperamos ver as opções de CPU Intel 8va ger., já que as gerações mais antigas estão começando a mostrar sua idade. Posicionamento de portas aprimorado, ruído do ventilador mais gradual, alto-falantes internos mais altos e teclas auxiliares personalizáveis podem contribuir para uma máquina ainda mais versátil.

Panasonic Toughbook CF-54G2999VM - 10/05/2018 v6
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
90 / 98 → 91%
Teclado
73%
Mouse
68%
Conectividade
45 / 80 → 57%
Peso
64 / 20-67 → 94%
Bateria
87%
Pantalha
70%
Desempenho do jogos
60 / 68 → 89%
Desempenho da aplicação
88 / 92 → 95%
Temperatura
93%
Ruído
95%
Audio
40%
Médio
73%
80%
Office - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Reforçado Panasonic Toughbook CF-54 (i5-7300U)
Allen Ngo, 2018-10-10 (Update: 2018-10-20)