Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do HP Elite x3 Phablet (incl. Lap Dock)

Corredor empresarial. A HP é o único fabricante que oferece um aparelho premium com Windows 10 Mobile, que é direcionado principalmente para clientes empresariais. Além de uma grande tela, o cliente também recebe uma bateria potente e uma carcaça robusta, que pode até mesmo rodar programas x86 com o HP Workspace.

HP Elite x3 (ElitePad Serie)
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 530, Análises do: 624 MHz
Memória
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4
Pantalha
5.96 polegadas 16:9, 2560x1440 pixel 493 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass 4, revestimento anti-refletivo, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Docking Station Port, Conexões Audio: Porta combinada para fones e microfone (3,5 mm), Card Reader: microSD de até 2 TB (SDHC, SDXC), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: distância, pressão, hall, posição, aceleração, e sensores G, bússola digital, BeiDou, Miracast, Wi-Fi Direct
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7260AN (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 e 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (bandas: 8, 2, 1, 4), LTE Cat. 6 (bandas: 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.8 x 161.8 x 83.5
Bateria
15.98 Wh, 4150 mAh Lítio-Polímero, 3,85 V, máx. 64 g, uma células, carregamento sem fio (Qi standard), Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 33 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 500 h
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix (plus 2.4 MP Iris camera)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2x 0.6 W Bang & Olufsen speaker, carregador, cabo USB, documentação, HP Work Space, HP All-in-One Remote, HP Device Hub, Continuum, 24 Meses Garantia, USB Type-C, escáner de íris, IP67, MIL-STD 810G, fanless
peso
195 g, Suprimento de energia: 101 g
Preço
899 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
HP Elite x3
HP Elite x3
HP Elite x3
HP Elite x3
HP Elite x3
HP Elite x3

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
1) HP Lap Dock 2) HP Elite x3
255
cd/m²
265
cd/m²
255
cd/m²
255
cd/m²
268
cd/m²
257
cd/m²
253
cd/m²
256
cd/m²
247
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
HP Lap Dock
Máximo: 268 cd/m² Médio: 256.8 cd/m² Minimum: 7.68 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 268 cd/m²
Contraste: 1072:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.9 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 6.9 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.12
357
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
351
cd/m²
333
cd/m²
321
cd/m²
354
cd/m²
333
cd/m²
321
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
HP Elite x3
Máximo: 357 cd/m² Médio: 336.4 cd/m² Minimum: 11.47 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 333 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.9 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 6.9 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.12

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 357.1 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 357.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 357.1 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8586 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
115867 Points ∼51%
Huawei Mate 9
124087 Points ∼54% +7%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
94122 Points ∼41% -19%
Lenovo Moto Z
129197 Points ∼57% +12%
LG G6
151751 Points ∼67% +31%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
165399 Points ∼73% +43%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
165382 Points ∼73% +43%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
47.19 fps ∼3%
Huawei Mate 9
80 fps ∼6% +70%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
27.11 fps ∼2% -43%
Lenovo Moto Z
77 fps ∼6% +63%
LG G6
75 fps ∼5% +59%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
91.96 fps ∼7% +95%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
104 fps ∼8% +120%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
26.42 fps ∼6%
Huawei Mate 9
60 fps ∼13% +127%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
18.75 fps ∼4% -29%
Lenovo Moto Z
53 fps ∼12% +101%
LG G6
46 fps ∼10% +74%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
57.71 fps ∼13% +118%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
58 fps ∼13% +120%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
34 fps ∼6%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
17.54 fps ∼3%
Lenovo Moto Z
41 fps ∼8%
LG G6
38 fps ∼7%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
58.71 fps ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
50 fps ∼9%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
37 fps ∼10%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
11.81 fps ∼3%
Lenovo Moto Z
26 fps ∼7%
LG G6
27 fps ∼7%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
55.17 fps ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
38 fps ∼10%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
34.02 fps ∼8%
Huawei Mate 9
24 fps ∼6% -29%
Lenovo Moto Z
27 fps ∼6% -21%
LG G6
29 fps ∼7% -15%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
41.3 fps ∼10% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
42 fps ∼10% +23%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
16.09 fps ∼9%
Huawei Mate 9
28 fps ∼16% +74%
Lenovo Moto Z
15 fps ∼9% -7%
LG G6
16 fps ∼9% -1%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
41.5 fps ∼24% +158%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
23 fps ∼13% +43%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
458 Points ∼27%
Huawei Mate 9
1076 Points ∼63% +135%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
837 Points ∼49% +83%
Lenovo Moto Z
959 Points ∼57% +109%
LG G6
1073 Points ∼63% +134%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1542 Points ∼91% +237%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1163 Points ∼69% +154%
Graphics (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
3974 Points ∼43%
Huawei Mate 9
3939 Points ∼43% -1%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
2040 Points ∼22% -49%
Lenovo Moto Z
4321 Points ∼47% +9%
LG G6
5138 Points ∼56% +29%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
6875 Points ∼74% +73%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6126 Points ∼66% +54%
Memory (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
2003 Points ∼45%
Huawei Mate 9
3850 Points ∼87% +92%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1945 Points ∼44% -3%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points ∼50% +9%
LG G6
1930 Points ∼44% -4%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1319 Points ∼30% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3135 Points ∼71% +57%
System (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
1384 Points ∼13%
Huawei Mate 9
3616 Points ∼35% +161%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1386 Points ∼13% 0%
Lenovo Moto Z
3398 Points ∼33% +146%
LG G6
3646 Points ∼35% +163%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
6582 Points ∼64% +376%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5319 Points ∼52% +284%
Overall (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
1499 Points ∼40%
Huawei Mate 9
2772 Points ∼73% +85%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1465 Points ∼39% -2%
Lenovo Moto Z
2356 Points ∼62% +57%
LG G6
2496 Points ∼66% +67%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3097 Points ∼82% +107%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3301 Points ∼87% +120%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
8664 Points ∼17%
Huawei Mate 9
11897 Points ∼24% +37%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
8059 Points ∼16% -7%
Lenovo Moto Z
7771 Points ∼16% -10%
LG G6
9113 Points ∼18% +5%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
26053 Points ∼53% +201%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
14050 Points ∼28% +62%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
130 Points ∼17%
Huawei Mate 9
152 Points ∼20% +17%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
113 Points ∼15% -13%
Lenovo Moto Z
112 Points ∼15% -14%
LG G6
122 Points ∼16% -6%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
204 Points ∼27% +57%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
154 Points ∼20% +18%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
HP Elite x3
4398.3 ms * ∼7%
Huawei Mate 9
2733.7 ms * ∼5% +38%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
5552.9 ms * ∼9% -26%
Lenovo Moto Z
3154.7 ms * ∼5% +28%
LG G6
2464.2 ms * ∼4% +44%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1102.7 ms * ∼2% +75%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2236.7 ms * ∼4% +49%

Legend

 
HP Elite x3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Mate 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 7 Plus Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 44 °C37.8 °C35.1 °C 
 37.6 °C37.9 °C34.8 °C 
 37 °C36.9 °C34.2 °C 
Máximo: 44 °C
Médio: 37.3 °C
34.2 °C35.5 °C37.1 °C
33.9 °C35.5 °C37.3 °C
33.2 °C35.3 °C36.1 °C
Máximo: 37.3 °C
Médio: 35.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  42.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.635.42525.436.93125.327.74032.928.95033.632.16331.631.38028.428.51002724.712520.830.51602237.520021.343.525020.847.331521.252.740019.458.350019.563.663017.768.580017.971.1100017.872125017.374.7160017.474.8200016.773.8250017.272.9315018.266.3400017.962500017.657.5630017.761.2800017.861.71000017.9601250018.156.91600018.256.8SPL3082.5N1.347.8median 17.9HP Elite x3median 61.2Delta1.39.531.635.725.424.825.324.932.925.633.635.131.630.128.423.32724.820.828.72235.521.343.320.849.321.253.719.455.119.56017.763.317.961.917.863.517.367.117.461.116.77017.272.618.274.117.976.217.675.717.773.917.871.517.972.518.166.718.254.13083.91.353.7median 17.9Huawei Mate 9median 63.31.310.726.428.426.42826.72825.828.725.829.133.229.126.12626.123.925.523.927.724.727.733.426.933.441.53741.540.320.240.343.720.243.745.521.845.547224752.822.252.860.121.860.166.517.266.569.217.869.271.619.871.669.919.169.96815.46869.515.669.56614.96671.514.771.571.214.271.272.21472.271.213.971.26713.86758.913.958.952.413.952.454.713.754.781.529.581.549.91.349.9median 66Apple iPhone 7 Plusmedian 17.2median 6610.93.810.9hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
HP Elite x3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.46 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei Mate 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple iPhone 7 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.45 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.06 / 0.27 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.86 / 1.46 / 1.59 Watt
Carga midlight 8.1 / 9.35 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Elite x3
4150 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
3340 mAh
Huawei Mate 9
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
2915 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
Power Consumption
-90%
-4%
31%
11%
-4%
29%
Idle Minimum *
0.86
2.85
-231%
0.78
9%
0.68
21%
0.62
28%
0.77
10%
0.66
23%
Idle Average *
1.46
2.95
-102%
2.13
-46%
1.13
23%
1.43
2%
2.04
-40%
1.01
31%
Idle Maximum *
1.59
3.26
-105%
2.17
-36%
1.16
27%
1.48
7%
2.24
-41%
1.09
31%
Load Average *
8.1
8.92
-10%
6.32
22%
4.69
42%
5.52
32%
4.69
42%
3.97
51%
Load Maximum *
9.35
9.39
-0%
6.49
31%
5.24
44%
10.47
-12%
8.66
7%
8.34
11%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
36h 45min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
7h 02min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 40min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 05min
HP Elite x3
4150 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
3340 mAh
Huawei Mate 9
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
2915 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
Battery Runtime
-22%
23%
23%
13%
21%
7%
Reader / Idle
2205
1078
-51%
1538
-30%
1565
-29%
1835
-17%
1789
-19%
1371
-38%
H.264
760
611
-20%
947
25%
742
-2%
813
7%
779
3%
724
-5%
WiFi v1.3
422
369
-13%
758
80%
736
74%
587
39%
692
64%
407
-4%
Load
185
179
-3%
219
18%
275
49%
225
22%
252
36%
320
73%

Pro

+ SoC veloz
+ Excelente qualidade de voz com ANC
+ Design robusto
+ Grande tela AMOLED
+ Armazenamento expansível
+ USB 3.1 com DisplayPort/HDMI
+ Sensor de íris e digitais
+ Fortes ambições empresariais
+ Bateria grande

Contra

- Alto consumo de energia sob uso intenso
- PWM flickering
In the test: HP Elite x3. Test unit provided by HP Germany.
In the test: HP Elite x3. Test unit provided by HP Germany.

O HP Elite x3 é um phablet maciço, que a HP anuncia como um tablet e não sem razão. Ele combina um design robusto e funcional para obter uma ferramenta empresarial bem sucedida. Destina-se ao setor de saúde, logística, POS, indústria e, principalmente, trabalhadores móveis que precisam de acesso fácil aos seus dados e que desejam usar o menor número possível de dispositivos. 

A última tarefa em particular, o HP Elite x3 domina muito bem, dado que não só pode ser usado como um smartphone, mas também como um cliente fino e com o Lap Dock também como um portátil com algumas limitações. Usá-lo como um portátil não foi muito legal durante o teste. A tela é bastante escura e a reprodução das cores poderia ser melhor. No entanto, gostamos das portas adicionais que transformam o Elite x3 em uma ferramenta de apresentação versátil. A grande bateria no Lap Dock também é uma vantagem.

O HP Elite x3 é um phablet robusto com uma forte base de hardware que representa uma solução empresarial bem sucedida para muitas áreas corporativas.

O HP Elite x3 não possui fraquezas reais, pois combina recursos de segurança abrangentes com uma plataforma móvel relativamente segura: Windows 10 Mobile. Apesar da pouca importância que o sistema operacional possa ter para o consumidor privado, é fácil para empresas de médio e grande porte integrar o dispositivo em sua infraestrutura de TI existente e administrá-lo. Além disso, recebe atualizações de segurança regularmente. Mas, mesmo para as pequenas empresas e os trabalhadores autônomos, a HP oferece uma entrada comparativamente acessível na computação em nuvem com o Workspace, o que torna desnecessária a compra e manutenção de hardware adicional. Isso é completado por vários produtos de garantia e serviço. O preço está a partir de cerca de 790 Libras.

No entanto, como produto de consumo, só podemos recomendar o phablet para os fanáticos Hard-core do Windows.

HP Elite x3 - 06/02/2017 v6
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento
90%
Teclado
75 / 75 → 99%
Mouse
96%
Conectividade
64 / 60 → 100%
Peso
88%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
80%
Desempenho do jogos
52 / 63 → 83%
Desempenho da aplicação
53 / 70 → 75%
Temperatura
88%
Ruído
100%
Audio
76 / 91 → 84%
Camera
72%
Médio
79%
86%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do HP Elite x3 Phablet (incl. Lap Dock)
Daniel Schmidt, 2017-06-18 (Update: 2017-06-22)