Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Microsoft Lumia 950 XL

Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 02/09/2016

Olá, Lumia! O novo carro chefe Windows finalmente chegou. Além de componentes poderosos, você também obtém ótimos recursos como Windows Hello e Continuum. A maior desvantagem do aparelho é o software, porque o Windows 10 Mobile ainda parece não estar pronto.

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL (Lumia Serie)
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 430
Memória
3072 MB 
Pantalha
5.7 polegadas 16:9, 2560x1440 pixel, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 25.2 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio combinado para fones e microfone, Card Reader: microSD até 200 GB (SD, SDHC, SDXC), NFC, Sensores: giroscópio, barõmetro, sensor de posição, sensor de luz ambiente, sensor de proximidade, magnetômetro, SensoreCore, Wifi Direct, Miracast, OTG, MHL 3.1, NFC
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800 e 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (Band 1, 2, 4, 5 e 8), LTE Cat. 6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40 e 41), LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.3 x 151.9 x 78.4
Bateria
13 Wh, 3340 mAh Lítio-Ion, removeable, 3.85 V, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 19 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 300 h
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile
Camera
Primary Camera: 20 MPix (6 lentes, zoom digital 2x, OS, tamanho do sensor: 1/2,4-polegadas, f/1.9, comprimento focal: 26 mm, flash Tri-LED, vídeo UHD)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (f/2.4, vídeo Full-HD)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: alto falante mono, Teclado: virtual, Adaptador de força, cabo USB, Microsoft Office Mobile, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR head: 0.56 W/kg, body SAR: 0.36 W/kg, carregamento wireless (Qi), carga rápida, Windows Hello
peso
165 g, Suprimento de energia: 70 g
Preço
699 Euro

 

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the zoom step. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
289
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
308
cd/m²
288
cd/m²
297
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
287
cd/m²
293
cd/m²
305
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 308 cd/m² Médio: 296.7 cd/m² Minimum: 7.19 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 297 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.67 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 2.81 | - Ø
99.79% sRGB (Argyll) 66.31% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.08
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Huawei Mate S
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Screen
16%
-30%
-0%
16%
24%
-52%
Brightness
297
338
14%
536
80%
560
89%
528
78%
365
23%
350
18%
Brightness Distribution
93
94
1%
90
-3%
91
-2%
92
-1%
90
-3%
87
-6%
Black Level *
0.47
0.46
0.66
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.67
2.2
18%
6.17
-131%
3.55
-33%
2.63
1%
2.34
12%
4.95
-85%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.81
2.37
16%
6.26
-123%
3.88
-38%
3.24
-15%
1.03
63%
6.54
-133%
Gamma
2.08 115%
2.41 100%
2.48 97%
2.2 109%
2.17 111%
2.23 108%
2.27 106%
CCT
6379 102%
6425 101%
8171 80%
7280 89%
6906 94%
6429 101%
6943 94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
66.31
87.77
32%
65.48
-1%
59.05
-11%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.79
98.63
-1%
92.8
-7%
Contrast
1204
1267
815

* ... smaller is better

Grayscale (profile: standard, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: standard, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: vivid, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: vivid, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: cool, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (profile: cool, target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (profile: standard, target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (profile: standard, target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (profile: vivid, target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (profile: vivid, target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (profile: cool, target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (profile: cool, target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (profile: standard, target color space: Adobe RGB)
ColorChecker (profile: standard, target color space: Adobe RGB)
ColorChecker (profile: vivid, target color space: Adobe RGB)
ColorChecker (profile: vivid, target color space: Adobe RGB)
ColorChecker (profile: cool, target color space: Adobe RGB)
ColorChecker (profile: cool, target color space: Adobe RGB)
Saturation (profile: standard, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (profile: standard, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (profile: vivid, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (profile: vivid, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (profile: cool, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (profile: cool, target color space: sRGB)
Color-space coverage sRGB: 99.79%
Color-space coverage sRGB: 99.79%
Color-space coverage Adobe RGB: 66.31%
Color-space coverage Adobe RGB: 66.31%

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.42 ms rise
↘ 0.52 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (27.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.72 ms rise
↘ 4.68 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (44.3 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 60 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 965 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 30860) Hz was measured.

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
27.11 fps ∼2%
Nokia Lumia 930
15 fps ∼1% -45%
Google Nexus 6P
44 fps ∼3% +62%
Motorola Moto X Style
34 fps ∼3% +25%
HTC One M9
49 fps ∼4% +81%
Sony Xperia Z5
49 fps ∼4% +81%
Huawei Mate S
10 fps ∼1% -63%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
78.9 fps ∼6% +191%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
18.75 fps ∼4%
Nokia Lumia 930
20 fps ∼4% +7%
Google Nexus 6P
33 fps ∼7% +76%
Motorola Moto X Style
24 fps ∼5% +28%
HTC One M9
50 fps ∼11% +167%
Sony Xperia Z5
49 fps ∼11% +161%
Huawei Mate S
11 fps ∼2% -41%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
59 fps ∼13% +215%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
17.54 fps ∼3%
Google Nexus 6P
25 fps ∼5% +43%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
18 fps ∼3% +3%
Motorola Moto X Style
15 fps ∼3% -14%
HTC One M9
23 fps ∼4% +31%
Sony Xperia Z5
24 fps ∼4% +37%
Huawei Mate S
5.8 fps ∼1% -67%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
38.4 fps ∼7% +119%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
11.81 fps ∼5%
Google Nexus 6P
17 fps ∼7% +44%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
14 fps ∼6% +19%
Motorola Moto X Style
9.3 fps ∼4% -21%
HTC One M9
24 fps ∼11% +103%
Sony Xperia Z5
26 fps ∼11% +120%
Huawei Mate S
6.3 fps ∼3% -47%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
38.4 fps ∼17% +225%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
837 Points ∼54%
Nokia Lumia 930
579 Points ∼38% -31%
Google Nexus 6P
791 Points ∼51% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
993 Points ∼64% +19%
Motorola Moto X Style
974 Points ∼63% +16%
HTC One M9
789 Points ∼51% -6%
Sony Xperia Z5
675 Points ∼44% -19%
Huawei Mate S
834 Points ∼54% 0%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1199 Points ∼78% +43%
Graphics (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
2040 Points ∼24%
Nokia Lumia 930
1233 Points ∼14% -40%
Google Nexus 6P
2424 Points ∼28% +19%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
2457 Points ∼29% +20%
Motorola Moto X Style
1918 Points ∼22% -6%
HTC One M9
3210 Points ∼37% +57%
Sony Xperia Z5
3095 Points ∼36% +52%
Huawei Mate S
962 Points ∼11% -53%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
4299 Points ∼50% +111%
Memory (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1945 Points ∼51%
Nokia Lumia 930
1500 Points ∼39% -23%
Google Nexus 6P
1136 Points ∼30% -42%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
1298 Points ∼34% -33%
Motorola Moto X Style
1776 Points ∼46% -9%
HTC One M9
933 Points ∼24% -52%
Sony Xperia Z5
865 Points ∼22% -56%
Huawei Mate S
1304 Points ∼34% -33%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1124 Points ∼29% -42%
System (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1386 Points ∼21%
Nokia Lumia 930
1296 Points ∼20% -6%
Google Nexus 6P
1798 Points ∼27% +30%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
3321 Points ∼50% +140%
Motorola Moto X Style
2783 Points ∼42% +101%
HTC One M9
1672 Points ∼25% +21%
Sony Xperia Z5
2360 Points ∼36% +70%
Huawei Mate S
2129 Points ∼32% +54%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
3925 Points ∼60% +183%
Overall (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1465 Points ∼45%
Nokia Lumia 930
1085 Points ∼33% -26%
Google Nexus 6P
1405 Points ∼43% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
1801 Points ∼55% +23%
Motorola Moto X Style
1743 Points ∼53% +19%
HTC One M9
1410 Points ∼43% -4%
Sony Xperia Z5
1437 Points ∼44% -2%
Huawei Mate S
1222 Points ∼37% -17%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2206 Points ∼67% +51%
Linpack Android / IOS
Multi Thread (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
2956.69 MFLOPS ∼100%
Nokia Lumia 930
930.16 MFLOPS ∼31% -69%
Google Nexus 6P
262.042 MFLOPS ∼9% -91%
Motorola Moto X Style
589.744 MFLOPS ∼20% -80%
HTC One M9
685.383 MFLOPS ∼23% -77%
Sony Xperia Z5
499.014 MFLOPS ∼17% -83%
Huawei Mate S
282.524 MFLOPS ∼10% -90%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1295 MFLOPS ∼44% -56%
Single Thread (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
369.586 MFLOPS ∼36%
Nokia Lumia 930
232.54 MFLOPS ∼23% -37%
Google Nexus 6P
87.088 MFLOPS ∼9% -76%
Motorola Moto X Style
415.017 MFLOPS ∼41% +12%
HTC One M9
578.161 MFLOPS ∼57% +56%
Sony Xperia Z5
251.752 MFLOPS ∼25% -32%
Huawei Mate S
129.572 MFLOPS ∼13% -65%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
669 MFLOPS ∼66% +81%
Basemark X 1.1 - Medium Quality (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
33082 Points ∼74%
Nokia Lumia 930
19987 Points ∼44% -40%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
31743 Points ∼71% -4%
HTC One M9
27968 Points ∼62% -15%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL (Edge 13.10586)
46 Points ∼0%
Google Nexus 6P
47.4 Points ∼0% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
48.136 Points ∼0% +5%
Motorola Moto X Style (Chrome 45)
45 Points ∼0% -2%
HTC One M9 (Chrome 44)
26.852 Points ∼0% -42%
Sony Xperia Z5 (Android 5.1.1, Google Chrome 46.0.2490.76)
37 Points ∼0% -20%
Huawei Mate S (Stock Browser Android 5.1)
25.412 Points ∼0% -45%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus (Safari Mobile 9.0.1)
118.7 Points ∼0% +158%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL (Edge 13.10586)
8059 Points ∼16%
Nokia Lumia 930
2737 Points ∼6% -66%
Google Nexus 6P (Chrome 47)
8804 Points ∼18% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ (Chrome 44)
7724 Points ∼16% -4%
Motorola Moto X Style (Chrome 45)
8065 Points ∼16% 0%
HTC One M9 (Chrome 41)
6493 Points ∼13% -19%
Sony Xperia Z5 (Android 5.1.1, Google Chrome 46.0.2490.76)
8627 Points ∼17% +7%
Huawei Mate S (Stock Browser Android 5.1)
4106 Points ∼8% -49%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus (Safari Mobile 9.0.1)
15967 Points ∼32% +98%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL (Edge 13.10586)
5552.9 ms * ∼9%
Nokia Lumia 930
11108 ms * ∼19% -100%
Google Nexus 6P (Chrome 47)
4193 ms * ∼7% +24%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
5066.7 ms * ∼9% +9%
Motorola Moto X Style (Chrome 45)
7325 ms * ∼12% -32%
HTC One M9 (Chrome 41)
6508.2 ms * ∼11% -17%
Sony Xperia Z5 (Android 5.1.1, Google Chrome 46.0.2490.76)
5693.1 ms * ∼10% -3%
Huawei Mate S (Stock Browser Android 5.1)
11028.7 ms * ∼19% -99%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus (Safari Mobile 9.0.1)
1743 ms * ∼3% +69%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL (Edge 13.10586)
113 Points ∼20%
Google Nexus 6P (Chrome 47)
116 Points ∼20% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
95 Points ∼17% -16%
Motorola Moto X Style (Chrome 46)
110 Points ∼19% -3%
HTC One M9 (Chrome 49)
72 Points ∼13% -36%
Sony Xperia Z5 (Android 5.1.1, Google Chrome 46.0.2490.76)
73 Points ∼13% -35%
Huawei Mate S (Stock Browser Android 5.1)
73 Points ∼13% -35%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus (Safari Mobile 9.0.1)
190 Points ∼33% +68%

Legend

 
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia Lumia 930 Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Google Nexus 6P Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP8, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Motorola Moto X Style Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC One M9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia Z5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Mate S HiSilicon Kirin 935, ARM Mali-T628 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPhone 6S Plus Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 38.2 °C39.9 °C45.7 °C 
 38.7 °C42.4 °C48.3 °C 
 40.1 °C40.5 °C45.4 °C 
Máximo: 48.3 °C
Médio: 42.1 °C
45.8 °C43.4 °C39.2 °C
45.8 °C45 °C39.6 °C
44.2 °C43.4 °C39.3 °C
Máximo: 45.8 °C
Médio: 42.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  31.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
Speaker measurement: Pink Noise
Speaker measurement: Pink Noise
Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.14 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 2.85 / 2.95 / 3.26 Watt
Carga midlight 8.92 / 9.39 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Sony Xperia Z5
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Huawei Mate S
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Power Consumption
49%
43%
43%
41%
53%
Idle Minimum *
2.85
0.5
82%
0.83
71%
0.7
75%
0.7
75%
0.6
79%
Idle Average *
2.95
1.9
36%
1.09
63%
2.2
25%
1.7
42%
1.2
59%
Idle Maximum *
3.26
2.2
33%
1.17
64%
2.3
29%
1.8
45%
1.6
51%
Load Average *
8.92
3.2
64%
7.49
16%
3.9
56%
5.6
37%
4.1
54%
Load Maximum *
9.39
6.4
32%
9.51
-1%
6.8
28%
8.7
7%
7.4
21%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
17h 58min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
6h 9min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 11min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 59min
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Huawei Mate S
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
Battery Runtime
32%
-0%
20%
28%
30%
Reader / Idle
1078
1459
35%
1141
6%
1447
34%
1124
4%
1655
54%
Load
179
223
25%
219
22%
280
56%
282
58%
197
10%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
369
501
36%
400
8%
375
2%
575
56%
513
39%
H.264
611
383
-37%
533
-13%
569
-7%
714
17%

Pro

+ SoC veloz
+ Armazenamento expansível
+ USB 3.1
+ Longo alcance do Wi-Fi
+ Continuum
+ Windows Hello
+ Bom desempenho do GPS
+ Ótimas câmeras
+ Boa conectividade
+ Ótima tela com cores precisas e tempos de resposta rápidos ...

Contra

- ... e PWM
- Pequenas falhas em termos de qualidade de voz
- Parece um pouco simples demais
- As durações poderiam ser melhores
- Aplicativos faltantes na loja
- Pequenos problemas wi
In review: Microsoft Lumia 950 XL. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.
In review: Microsoft Lumia 950 XL. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.

A longa espera por um novo smartphone carro chefe da Microsoft valeu a pena. O Lumia 950 XL é um ótimo produto de gama alta, que não comete erros no relacionado com a tecnologia. Além do veloz SoC, você obtém armazenamento suficiente, que também pode ser expandido. A câmera também consegue convencer e tira ótimas fotos e vídeos. A Microsoft implementa uma nova porta USB Tipo-C que inclusive suporta o padrão USB 3.1, que atualmente é único neste segmento.

Apenas esta porta é a chave para Continuum, que pode ser um verdadeiro benefício e cria novas possibilidades. A Microsoft também adiciona um ano de Office 365, bem como um Display Dock se você adquirir o smartphone agora. Windows Hello é um simples e confiável método de autenticação e está bem integrado no sistema.

O Lumia 950 XL é um smartphone com boas especificações e ótimos recursos, que pode ser usado como um substituto de PC graças ao Continuum.

O maior problema do smartphone do gigante do software é, de fato, o software. Tanto a ideia quanto a interface do usuário do Windows 10 Mobile são ótimos, mas o sistema operacional infelizmente parece ainda não estar pronto. A loja também não tem muitos aplicativos, o qual é um problema conhecido para as versões móveis do Windows. A qualidade da voz também poderia ser melhor para um aparelho de gama alta nesta faixa de preços.

Se estiver procurando um ótimo smartphone com Windows 10, o Lumia 950 XL é definitivamente uma boa opção e não há outras alternativas sérias. O primeiro concorrente Windows de verdade será o Acer Liquid Jade Primo, que deve estar disponível em fevereiro.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL - 04/13/2016 v5
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento
87%
Teclado
77 / 75 → 100%
Mouse
97%
Conectividade
60 / 60 → 100%
Peso
91%
Bateria
90%
Pantalha
89%
Desempenho do jogos
60 / 63 → 95%
Desempenho da aplicação
54 / 70 → 77%
Temperatura
83%
Ruído
100%
Audio
68 / 91 → 74%
Camera
87%
Médio
80%
89%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Daniel Schmidt, 2016-02- 9 (Update: 2016-02-20)