Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Lenovo Moto Z

Andreas Kilian (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 10/04/2016

Moto-mania. O novo carro chefe Moto Z da Lenovo não apresenta apenas tecnologia de gama alta, mas também quer atrair clientes com a sua expansibilidade modular, bem como o design do chassi extremamente fino. O conceito funciona na prática ou existe alguma desvantagem como uma duração reduzida da bateria?

Lenovo Moto Z (Moto Z Serie)
Processador
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 530, Análises do: 510 MHz
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
5.5 polegadas 16:9, 2560x1440 pixel 534 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 22.8 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: Adaptador de cabo USB Type-C para conector de fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 2 TB (em combinação com o 2do slot SIM), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Proximidade, Hall, Magnetômetro, Giroscópio, USB-OTG, Moto Mods
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM / GPRS / EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS / HSPA+ (850, 900, 1700, 1900, 2100 MHz), 4G LTE (Bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41), SAR Head: 0,304 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 5.19 x 155.3 x 75.3
Bateria
9.8 Wh, 2600 mAh
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (auto foco f/1.8, vídeo 2160p @ 30 fps)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (foco fixo f/2.2, vídeo 1080p @ 30 fps)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falante mono frontal, Teclado: virtual, PSU, adaptador de áudio, ferramente para o slot SIM, Style Shell Nylon, para-choque plástico, Moto-App, 12 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
136 g, Suprimento de energia: 97 g
Preço
699 EUR

 

Lenovo Moto Z - Front
Lenovo Moto Z - Rear
Lenovo Moto Z - Rear with fingerprints
Lenovo Moto Z - Camera
Lenovo Moto Z - Moto Mods contacts
Lenovo Moto Z - Physical buttons
Lenovo Moto Z - Box
Lenovo Moto Z - Audio adapter
Lenovo Moto Z - Power adapter

Size Comparison

Style Shell Nylon
Style Shell Nylon
Style Shell Nylon
Style Shell Nylon
Style Shell Nylon with transparent bumper
Transparent bumper
JBL speaker
JBL speaker
JBL-Lautsprecher
Insta-Share projector
Insta-Share projector
Insta-Share projector
Insta-Share projector
Insta-Share projector
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Moto Z
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash (5.0 GHz)
491 MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (5.0 GHz)
427 MBit/s ∼87% -13%
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash (5.0 GHz)
303 MBit/s ∼62% -38%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
303 MBit/s ∼62% -38%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
286 MBit/s ∼58% -42%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
249 MBit/s ∼51% -49%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (5.0 GHz)
395 MBit/s ∼100% +10%
Lenovo Moto Z
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash (5.0 GHz)
360 MBit/s ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
290 MBit/s ∼73% -19%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
256 MBit/s ∼65% -29%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
205 MBit/s ∼52% -43%
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash (5.0 GHz)
151 MBit/s ∼38% -58%
Lenovo Moto Z - Overview
Lenovo Moto Z - Overview
Lenovo Moto Z - Bridge
Lenovo Moto Z - Bridge
Lenovo Moto Z - Turning Point
Lenovo Moto Z - Turning Point
Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
Garmin Edge 500 - Bridge
Garmin Edge 500 - Bridge
Garmin Edge 500 - Turning Point
Garmin Edge 500 - Turning Point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the zoom step. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Sample picture
Sample picture HDR
Sample picture
Macro shot
Sample picture HDR
Panorama – horizontally
Panorama – vertically
Picture of the ColorChecker colors. The reference color is displayed in the lower part of each patch.
Picture of the ColorChecker colors. The reference color is displayed in the lower part of each patch.
Test chart (click for original)
Test chart (click for original)
486
cd/m²
498
cd/m²
512
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
485
cd/m²
502
cd/m²
469
cd/m²
485
cd/m²
506
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 512 cd/m² Médio: 490.3 cd/m² Minimum: 5.87 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 485 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | - Ø
100% sRGB (Argyll) 88.14% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.23
Lenovo Moto Z
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
LG G5
IPS Quantum, 2560x1440, 5.3
Huawei P9 Plus
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
OnePlus 3
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Google Nexus 6P
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Screen
Brightness
490
552
13%
774
58%
366
-25%
431
-12%
365
-26%
297
-39%
553
13%
Brightness Distribution
92
96
4%
91
-1%
87
-5%
84
-9%
90
-2%
93
1%
97
5%
Black Level *
0.43
0.35
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.1
1.59
24%
6.5
-210%
5.1
-143%
4.1
-95%
2.34
-11%
2.67
-27%
1.4
33%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.6
2.01
23%
8
-208%
5.5
-112%
3.3
-27%
1.03
60%
2.81
-8%
1.3
50%
Gamma
2.23 108%
2.01 119%
2.22 108%
2.24 107%
2.1 114%
2.23 108%
2.08 115%
2.21 109%
CCT
6843 95%
6321 103%
8699 75%
7388 88%
6550 99%
6429 101%
6379 102%
6667 97%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
88.14
82.12
-7%
68.08
-23%
89.38
1%
66.31
-25%
63.1
-28%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
99.98
0%
97.46
-3%
100
0%
99.79
0%
99.83
0%
Contrast
1823
1591

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 250 Hz100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 59 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 4338 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms rise
↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (27.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 5.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (43.7 ms).
Grayscale (Standard, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (Standard, target color space sRGB)
ColorChecker (Standard, target color space sRGB)
ColorChecker (Standard, target color space sRGB)
ColorChecker (Standard, target color space AdobeRGB)
ColorChecker (Standard, target color space AdobeRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (Standard, target color space sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (Standard, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (Intense, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (Intense, target color space sRGB)
ColorChecker (Intense, target color space sRGB)
ColorChecker (Intense, target color space sRGB)
ColorChecker (Intense, target color space AdobeRGB)
ColorChecker (Intense, target color space AdobeRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (Intense, target color space sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (Intense, target color space sRGB)
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
129197 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
128749 Points ∼56% 0%
LG G5
124244 Points ∼54% -4%
Huawei P9 Plus
98413 Points ∼43% -24%
OnePlus 3 (Version 6.1.4)
142090 Points ∼62% +10%
Google Nexus 6P
79502 Points ∼35% -38%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL (v6.0.5 UWP Beta5)
94122 Points ∼41% -27%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
165399 Points ∼73% +28%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
5450 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
6480 (min: 6415) Points ∼20% +19%
LG G5
5507 Points ∼17% +1%
Huawei P9 Plus
6556 Points ∼20% +20%
OnePlus 3
5645 Points ∼17% +4%
Google Nexus 6P
4587 Points ∼14% -16%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
2080 Points ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2170 (min: 2120) Points ∼46% +4%
LG G5
2396 Points ∼50% +15%
Huawei P9 Plus
1929 Points ∼41% -7%
OnePlus 3
2398 Points ∼50% +15%
Google Nexus 6P
1335 Points ∼28% -36%
Geekbench 4.0
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
6326 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2805 Points ∼34% -56%
LG G5
6499 Points ∼79% +3%
OnePlus 3
7085 Points ∼86% +12%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
3946 Points ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
5503 Points ∼21% +39%
LG G5
3833 Points ∼14% -3%
OnePlus 3
4097 Points ∼15% +4%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
5630 Points ∼21% +43%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
1480 Points ∼27%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
1840 Points ∼34% +24%
LG G5
1674 Points ∼31% +13%
OnePlus 3
1754 Points ∼32% +19%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3476 Points ∼63% +135%
ANDEBench PRO
3D (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
58.87 fps ∼45%
LG G5
47.42 fps ∼36% -19%
OnePlus 3
62.91 fps ∼48% +7%
Platform (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
404.1 Points ∼6%
LG G5
298.6 Points ∼4% -26%
OnePlus 3
246.4 Points ∼4% -39%
Storage (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
14580 KB/s ∼14%
LG G5
6137 KB/s ∼6% -58%
OnePlus 3
6959 KB/s ∼7% -52%
Memory Latency (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
5740 KOps/s ∼71%
LG G5
6035 KOps/s ∼75% +5%
OnePlus 3
6059 KOps/s ∼75% +6%
Memory Bandwidth (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
19176 MB/s ∼91%
LG G5
19035 MB/s ∼91% -1%
OnePlus 3
19937 MB/s ∼95% +4%
CoreMark-PRO/HPC (Base) (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
4834 Points ∼75%
LG G5
4959 Points ∼77% +3%
OnePlus 3
5098 Points ∼79% +5%
Device Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
15951 Points ∼61%
LG G5
13173 Points ∼51% -17%
OnePlus 3
13768 Points ∼53% -14%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
7637 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4660 Points ∼56% -39%
LG G5
5581 Points ∼67% -27%
Huawei P9 Plus
7159 Points ∼86% -6%
OnePlus 3 (OxygenOS 3.1.2)
7101 Points ∼86% -7%
Google Nexus 6P
4716 Points ∼57% -38%
BaseMark OS II
Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
4321 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2203 Points ∼26% -49%
LG G5
4807 Points ∼56% +11%
Huawei P9 Plus
1512 Points ∼18% -65%
OnePlus 3
4813 Points ∼56% +11%
Google Nexus 6P
2424 Points ∼28% -44%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
2040 Points ∼24% -53%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
6875 Points ∼80% +59%
System (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
3398 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4080 Points ∼62% +20%
LG G5
2925 Points ∼44% -14%
Huawei P9 Plus
3932 Points ∼60% +16%
OnePlus 3
3537 Points ∼54% +4%
Google Nexus 6P
1798 Points ∼27% -47%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1386 Points ∼21% -59%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
6582 Points ∼100% +94%
Overall (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
2356 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2074 Points ∼56% -12%
LG G5
2079 Points ∼56% -12%
Huawei P9 Plus
2019 Points ∼55% -14%
OnePlus 3
2496 Points ∼68% +6%
Google Nexus 6P
1405 Points ∼38% -40%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1465 Points ∼40% -38%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3097 Points ∼84% +31%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
542 Points ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
733 Points ∼39% +35%
LG G5 (9.6 fps offscreen)
543 Points ∼29% 0%
OnePlus 3 (11.2 fps offscreen)
631 Points ∼34% +16%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1177 Points ∼63% +117%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
77 fps ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
81 fps ∼6% +5%
LG G5
74 fps ∼6% -4%
Huawei P9 Plus
41 fps ∼3% -47%
OnePlus 3
89 fps ∼7% +16%
Google Nexus 6P
44 fps ∼3% -43%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
27.11 fps ∼2% -65%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
91.96 fps ∼7% +19%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
53 fps ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
51 fps ∼11% -4%
LG G5
47 fps ∼10% -11%
Huawei P9 Plus
43 fps ∼9% -19%
OnePlus 3
60 fps ∼13% +13%
Google Nexus 6P
33 fps ∼7% -38%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
18.75 fps ∼4% -65%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
57.71 fps ∼13% +9%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
41 fps ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
38 fps ∼7% -7%
LG G5
42 fps ∼8% +2%
Huawei P9 Plus
18 fps ∼3% -56%
OnePlus 3
47 fps ∼9% +15%
Google Nexus 6P
25 fps ∼5% -39%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
17.54 fps ∼3% -57%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
58.71 fps ∼11% +43%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
26 fps ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
27 fps ∼12% +4%
LG G5
30 fps ∼13% +15%
Huawei P9 Plus
19 fps ∼8% -27%
OnePlus 3
46 fps ∼20% +77%
Google Nexus 6P
17 fps ∼7% -35%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
11.81 fps ∼5% -55%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
55.17 fps ∼24% +112%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
27 fps ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28 fps ∼7% +4%
LG G5
31 fps ∼7% +15%
Huawei P9 Plus
10 fps ∼2% -63%
OnePlus 3
31 fps ∼7% +15%
Google Nexus 6P
16 fps ∼4% -41%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
41.3 fps ∼10% +53%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
15 fps ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps ∼9% 0%
LG G5
17 fps ∼10% +13%
Huawei P9 Plus
11 fps ∼6% -27%
OnePlus 3
30 fps ∼17% +100%
Google Nexus 6P
9.5 fps ∼5% -37%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
41.5 fps ∼24% +177%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
16 fps ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps ∼4% -6%
LG G5
18 fps ∼5% +13%
Huawei P9 Plus
6.2 fps ∼2% -61%
OnePlus 3
18 fps ∼5% +13%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
9.8 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
7.9 fps ∼0% -19%
LG G5
11 fps ∼0% +12%
Huawei P9 Plus
6.8 fps ∼0% -31%
OnePlus 3
18 fps ∼1% +84%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
1828 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2002 (min: 1539) Points ∼69% +10%
LG G5
1695 Points ∼58% -7%
Huawei P9 Plus
2336 Points ∼80% +28%
OnePlus 3
1789 Points ∼61% -2%
Google Nexus 6P
1142 Points ∼39% -38%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1522 Points ∼52% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
3718 Points ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3015 (min: 2895) Points ∼39% -19%
LG G5
4468 Points ∼58% +20%
Huawei P9 Plus
1042 Points ∼13% -72%
OnePlus 3
4633 Points ∼60% +25%
Google Nexus 6P
2302 Points ∼30% -38%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
4235 Points ∼55% +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
3023 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2710 (min: 2421) Points ∼54% -10%
LG G5
3277 Points ∼66% +8%
Huawei P9 Plus
1188 Points ∼24% -61%
OnePlus 3
3424 Points ∼69% +13%
Google Nexus 6P
1877 Points ∼38% -38%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3034 Points ∼61% 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
20948 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
19610 Points ∼28% -6%
LG G5
20997 Points ∼30% 0%
Huawei P9 Plus
15331 Points ∼22% -27%
OnePlus 3
21771 Points ∼32% +4%
Google Nexus 6P
14983 Points ∼22% -28%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
15626 Points ∼23% -25%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
26659 Points ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
33031 Points ∼7% +24%
LG G5
32109 Points ∼7% +20%
Huawei P9 Plus
21807 Points ∼5% -18%
OnePlus 3
34023 Points ∼7% +28%
Google Nexus 6P
34758 Points ∼8% +30%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
63386 Points ∼14% +138%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
25135 Points ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28671 Points ∼15% +14%
LG G5
28730 Points ∼15% +14%
Huawei P9 Plus
19936 Points ∼10% -21%
OnePlus 3
30241 Points ∼15% +20%
Google Nexus 6P
26876 Points ∼14% +7%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
37746 Points ∼19% +50%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
24.33 fps ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
13.31 fps ∼36% -45%
LG G5
25.26 fps ∼69% +4%
OnePlus 3
23.32 fps ∼64% -4%
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
59.8 fps ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (2560x1440)
60 fps ∼99% 0%
LG G5 (2392x1440 px)
55.8 fps ∼92% -7%
OnePlus 3 (1920x1080px)
59.6 fps ∼99% 0%
Basemark X 1.1
High Quality (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
33028 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
32273 Points ∼73% -2%
LG G5
25532 Points ∼58% -23%
OnePlus 3
33064 Points ∼75% 0%
Medium Quality (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
41445 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
41091 Points ∼91% -1%
LG G5
28538 Points ∼63% -31%
OnePlus 3
Points ∼0% -100%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
33082 Points ∼74% -20%
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1
3D Graphics Tests (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
2461 Points ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2131 Points ∼64% -13%
LG G5
2168 Points ∼65% -12%
OnePlus 3
1913 Points ∼58% -22%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
2017 Points ∼61% -18%
2D Graphics Tests (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
4781 Points ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
6382 Points ∼62% +33%
LG G5
5498 Points ∼54% +15%
OnePlus 3
5727 Points ∼56% +20%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
5495 Points ∼54% +15%
Memory Tests (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
8912 Points ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
6136 Points ∼22% -31%
LG G5
10573 Points ∼38% +19%
OnePlus 3
11024 Points ∼39% +24%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
25299 Points ∼90% +184%
Disk Tests (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
68378 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
36364 Points ∼27% -47%
LG G5
100164 Points ∼73% +46%
OnePlus 3
91875 Points ∼67% +34%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
48907 Points ∼36% -28%
CPU Tests (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
170521 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
225427 Points ∼83% +32%
LG G5
162632 Points ∼60% -5%
OnePlus 3
182968 Points ∼67% +7%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
49294 Points ∼18% -71%
System (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
8795 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8049 Points ∼78% -8%
LG G5
8724 Points ∼84% -1%
OnePlus 3
8196 Points ∼79% -7%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
8420 Points ∼81% -4%

Legend

 
Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
LG G5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P9 Plus HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Google Nexus 6P Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPhone 7 Plus Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z (Chrome 53)
3154.7 ms * ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
2564.1 ms * ∼4% +19%
LG G5 (Chrome 49)
3461.1 ms * ∼6% -10%
Huawei P9 Plus (Chrome 51)
2792.3 ms * ∼5% +11%
OnePlus 3 (Chrome 51)
2920.7 ms * ∼5% +7%
Google Nexus 6P (Chrome 47)
4193 ms * ∼7% -33%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL (Edge 13.10586)
5552.9 ms * ∼9% -76%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus (Safari Mobile 10.0)
1102.7 ms * ∼2% +65%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z (Chrome 53)
7771 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
13191 Points ∼27% +70%
LG G5 (Chrome 49)
9731 Points ∼20% +25%
Huawei P9 Plus (Chrome 51)
12058 Points ∼24% +55%
OnePlus 3 (Chrome 51)
9155 Points ∼18% +18%
Google Nexus 6P (Chrome 47)
8804 Points ∼18% +13%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL (Edge 13.10586)
8059 Points ∼16% +4%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus (Safari Mobile 10.0)
26053 Points ∼53% +235%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z (Chrome 53)
112 Points ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
163 Points ∼28% +46%
LG G5 (Chrome 49)
108 Points ∼19% -4%
Huawei P9 Plus (Chrome 51)
130 Points ∼22% +16%
OnePlus 3 (Chrome 51)
122 Points ∼21% +9%
Google Nexus 6P (Chrome 47)
116 Points ∼20% +4%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL (Edge 13.10586)
113 Points ∼19% +1%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
204 Points ∼35% +82%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z (Chrome 53)
47.5 Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
75.12 Points ∼0% +58%
LG G5 (Chrome 49)
49.7 Points ∼0% +5%
Huawei P9 Plus (Chrome 51)
70 Points ∼0% +47%
OnePlus 3 (chrome 51)
54.4 Points ∼0% +15%
Google Nexus 6P
47.4 Points ∼0% 0%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL (Edge 13.10586)
46 Points ∼0% -3%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus (Safari Mobile 10.0)
168.08 Points ∼1% +254%
Vellamo 3.x - Browser (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z (Chrome 53)
5344 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
7198 (min: 6255) Points ∼95% +35%
LG G5 (Android WebView 3.2.4)
5473 (min: 4080) Points ∼72% +2%
OnePlus 3 (Android WebView 3.2.6)
5814 (min: 5467) Points ∼77% +9%
BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
959 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
994 Points ∼64% +4%
LG G5
900 Points ∼58% -6%
Huawei P9 Plus
1049 Points ∼68% +9%
OnePlus 3
1112 Points ∼72% +16%
Google Nexus 6P
791 Points ∼51% -18%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
837 Points ∼54% -13%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1542 Points ∼100% +61%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
45.64 MB/s ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
50.36 MB/s ∼58% +10%
LG G5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
45.53 MB/s ∼52% 0%
Huawei P9 Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
24.95 MB/s ∼29% -45%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
78.51 MB/s ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
76.43 MB/s ∼79% -3%
LG G5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
78.53 MB/s ∼81% 0%
Huawei P9 Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
62.48 MB/s ∼65% -20%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
74.93 MB/s ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15.79 MB/s ∼10% -79%
LG G5
16.22 MB/s ∼11% -78%
Huawei P9 Plus
51.23 MB/s ∼34% -32%
OnePlus 3
18.23 MB/s ∼12% -76%
Google Nexus 6P
11.79 MB/s ∼8% -84%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
117.15 MB/s ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
86.71 MB/s ∼50% -26%
LG G5
89.26 MB/s ∼52% -24%
Huawei P9 Plus
39.33 MB/s ∼23% -66%
OnePlus 3
137.62 MB/s ∼80% +17%
Google Nexus 6P
20.1 MB/s ∼12% -83%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
168.32 MB/s ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
145.11 MB/s ∼70% -14%
LG G5
141.26 MB/s ∼68% -16%
Huawei P9 Plus
140.38 MB/s ∼68% -17%
OnePlus 3
153.3 MB/s ∼74% -9%
Google Nexus 6P
122.51 MB/s ∼59% -27%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
439.66 MB/s ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
487.34 MB/s ∼61% +11%
LG G5
427.65 MB/s ∼54% -3%
Huawei P9 Plus
284.27 MB/s ∼36% -35%
OnePlus 3
408.71 MB/s ∼52% -7%
Google Nexus 6P
236.33 MB/s ∼30% -46%
BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2072 Points ∼48% -5%
LG G5
1478 Points ∼35% -33%
Huawei P9 Plus
2667 Points ∼62% +22%
OnePlus 3
2052 Points ∼48% -6%
Google Nexus 6P
1136 Points ∼27% -48%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1945 Points ∼45% -11%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1319 Points ∼31% -40%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high29 fps
 very low29 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high60 fps
Carga Máxima
 36.1 °C37.2 °C40.8 °C 
 35.8 °C37.3 °C42.4 °C 
 35.6 °C37.5 °C41.4 °C 
Máximo: 42.4 °C
Médio: 38.2 °C
38.3 °C39.9 °C37.2 °C
39.4 °C40.6 °C36 °C
39.9 °C40.6 °C36.1 °C
Máximo: 40.6 °C
Médio: 38.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  34.3 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.636.22525.430.63125.328.54032.928.15033.638.26331.633.38028.428.4100272612520.825.81602230.920021.336.425020.844.731521.248.940019.453.750019.56163017.763.780017.969.8100017.872.8125017.373160017.472.8200016.773.3250017.274.4315018.273400017.973.1500017.670.8630017.770.5800017.870.91000017.971.91250018.166.61600018.261.4SPL3083.9N1.356.8median 17.9Lenovo Moto Zmedian 69.8Delta1.312.831.638.525.446.325.34832.945.933.646.631.650.728.449.12756.720.862.22268.421.373.620.876.421.276.919.476.519.580.817.778.917.981.817.883.317.38417.484.916.784.417.284.618.280.617.979.217.685.317.785.217.882.517.980.518.180.118.278.13095.21.3120.9median 17.9MotoMod JBL-Soundboostmedian 80.51.34.433.836.432.433.831.829.931.331.832.732.731.732.732.333.12632.345.446.139.445.429.630.736.229.629.525.228.629.525.923.125.425.925.623.421.325.637.124.723.337.150.127.122.550.156.234.622.456.261.840.421.361.864.74318.464.769.648.717.569.668.847.117.568.867.647.417.267.672.850.316.872.87552.217.37575.953.717.475.97652.116.67674.849.817.374.874.849.417.674.874.548.917.674.576.251.317.776.275.750.817.475.775.451.917.775.472.55117.972.571.150.518.171.164.247.518.164.286.462.729.886.46816.41.368median 71.1LG G5median 48.9median 17.7median 71.19.86.81.69.8hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Lenovo Moto Z audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

no name audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (95.16 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

LG G5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.41 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.12 / 0.22 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.66 / 1.01 / 1.09 Watt
Carga midlight 3.97 / 8.34 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3600 mAh
LG G5
2800 mAh
Huawei P9 Plus
3400 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Google Nexus 6P
3450 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
3340 mAh
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
2915 mAh
Power Consumption
-15%
-38%
-11%
-22%
-29%
-172%
-49%
Idle Minimum *
0.66
0.63
5%
0.55
17%
0.87
-32%
0.57
14%
0.83
-26%
2.85
-332%
0.77
-17%
Idle Average *
1.01
1.1
-9%
1.37
-36%
1.2
-19%
1.24
-23%
1.09
-8%
2.95
-192%
2.04
-102%
Idle Maximum *
1.09
1.56
-43%
2.25
-106%
1.27
-17%
1.36
-25%
1.17
-7%
3.26
-199%
2.24
-106%
Load Average *
3.97
5.95
-50%
6.24
-57%
4.69
-18%
5.92
-49%
7.49
-89%
8.92
-125%
4.69
-18%
Load Maximum *
8.34
6.7
20%
9.12
-9%
5.63
32%
10.53
-26%
9.51
-14%
9.39
-13%
8.66
-4%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
22h 51min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3 (Chrome 53)
6h 47min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 04min
Carga (máximo brilho)
5h 20min
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3600 mAh
LG G5
2800 mAh
Huawei P9 Plus
3400 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Google Nexus 6P
3450 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
3340 mAh
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
2915 mAh
Battery Runtime
38%
-1%
6%
26%
-10%
-23%
15%
Reader / Idle
1371
1663
21%
1833
34%
1446
5%
1338
-2%
1447
6%
1078
-21%
1835
34%
Load
320
392
23%
267
-17%
263
-18%
268
-16%
280
-12%
179
-44%
225
-30%
WiFi v1.3
407
732
80%
387
-5%
530
30%
840
106%
375
-8%
369
-9%
587
44%
H.264
724
914
26%
600
-17%
776
7%
847
17%
533
-26%
611
-16%
813
12%

Pro

+ Chassi fino e leve com boa qualidade de construção
+ Expansível com Moto Mods
+ Sem software desnecessário
+ Porta USB Type-C veloz
+ O cartão micro-SD pode ser formatado como armazenamento interno
+ AC WLAN muito veloz
+ Bons recursos do telefone
+ Tela táctil precisa
+ Tela de alta resolução
+ Leitor de digitais confiável
+ Rápido desempenho do sistema
+ Entregue com carregador rápido e Style Shell

Contra

- A qualidade das imagens da câmera principal revela fraquezas
- Sem suporte para Miracast
- Tela com flickering PWM
- Sem headset incluído
- Bateria integrada
- Sem conector para fones de 3,5 mm
In review: Lenovo Moto Z (XT1650-03). Test model courtesy of Lenovo Germany.
In review: Lenovo Moto Z (XT1650-03). Test model courtesy of Lenovo Germany.

O novo telefone carro chefe da Lenovo, Moto Z, se destaca principalmente dos rivais com sua expansibilidade modular. Os chamados Moto Mods introduzem novos recursos, que normalmente não estão disponíveis para um smartphone. Um obstáculo poderia ser os preços bastante altos dos módulos, mas a Lenovo promete suportar pelo menos três gerações de aparelhos, por isso, dito mod poder fazer sentido no longo prazo.

Mas o Moto Z é um smartphone bem-sucedido sem a compra de módulos adicionais e não tem nada que esconder da concorrência de gama alta: O chassi fino sofisticado e extremamente fino, bem como os poderosos componentes podem justificar o preço premium. E a interface de usuário mais padrão do Android também deve ter muitos fanáticos. Também ficamos surpreendidos pelas boas durações na prática, apesar da bateria pequena.

Não entendemos por que a Lenovo entrega o Moto Z com uma câmera apenas média – o sensor de 21 MP do irmão Moto Z Force teria sido uma boa adição aqui. Alguns compradores potenciais também podem sentir falta do conector para fones de 3,5 mm, embora o smartphone é entregue com um adaptador correspondente.

Graças ao novo conceito Moto Mod, existe um pouco de ar fresco no segmento de smartphones de gama alta. Mas o Moto Z também convence com clássicos recursos de smartphone. Somente a qualidade da imagem da câmera principal fica atrás de rivais de gama alta.

Se você gosta dos conceitos de smartphones modulares, também deveria dar uma olhada no LG G5 antes de comprar o Moto Z. A LG não tem muitas expansões e o manuseio não é tão confortável, mas o preço do smartphone já caiu para 450 Euros (~$506) apesar do hardware premium – e é, portanto, muito mais barato que o modelo de teste.

Lenovo Moto Z - 09/26/2016 v5.1
Andreas Kilian

Acabamento
93%
Teclado
71 / 75 → 94%
Mouse
94%
Conectividade
55 / 60 → 92%
Peso
93%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
90%
Desempenho do jogos
60 / 63 → 94%
Desempenho da aplicação
64 / 70 → 91%
Temperatura
87%
Ruído
100%
Audio
74 / 91 → 81%
Camera
73%
Médio
80%
89%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Lenovo Moto Z
Andreas Kilian, 2016-10- 4 (Update: 2016-10-13)