Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW (Core i9-9880H, RTX 2070)

Mike Wobker, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 06/05/2019

Inspiração RGB. A ASUS está se concentrando em mais do que apenas a iluminação RGB, em uma terceira encarnação de sua ROG Strix Scar. A empresa também incluiu um bom recurso de segurança chamado Keystone, juntamente com um hardware poderoso. O G531GW oferece muito no papel, mas será que consegue atender às expectativas?

Asus Strix Scar III G531GW (G531 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i9-9880H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Análises do: 1215 MHz, Memoría: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, TU106, FoceWare 419.71, Optimus
Memória
32768 MB 
, 2 x 16 GB DDR4-2666 SO-DIMM, dual-channel, todos os slots ocupados
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, Sharp LQ156M1JW09 (SHP14D3), IPS, Full-HD, 240 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW010T8, 1024 GB 
, Slot PCIe. 1 x M.2 2280, 1 baia de 2,5 polegadas, 890 GB livre
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC294 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: Conector combinado para fones e microfone de 3,5 mm
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 25 x 360 x 275
Bateria
66 Wh Lítio-Polímero, 4 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2 alto-falantes estéreo de 3,5 W, Teclado: Chiclet RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Keystone chip with carry strap, McAfee Security, diversas ferramentas do fabricante, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.324 kg, Suprimento de energia: 844 g
Preço
2600 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW
ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW
ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW
ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW
ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW
ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW
ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW

Size Comparison

397 mm 268 mm 27 mm 2.7 kg396 mm 261 mm 27.5 mm 2.5 kg361 mm 246 mm 24.4 mm 2.4 kg360 mm 275 mm 25 mm 2.3 kg356 mm 250 mm 18.9 mm 2.1 kg
Front: No connections
Front: No connections
Rear: Gigabit LAN, HDMI, 1 x USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-C, power connector
Rear: Gigabit LAN, HDMI, 1 x USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-C, power connector
Left-hand side: 3 x USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-A, combined headphone and microphone jack
Left-hand side: 3 x USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-A, combined headphone and microphone jack
Right-hand side: Keystone slot
Right-hand side: Keystone slot
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
680 MBit/s ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
663 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
MSI GE75 8SF
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
658 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Aorus 15 X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
645 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=249)
605 MBit/s ∼89% -11%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GE75 8SF
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
686 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
680 MBit/s ∼99% +1%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
675 MBit/s ∼98%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
674 MBit/s ∼98% 0%
Aorus 15 X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
622 MBit/s ∼91% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 730, n=249)
558 MBit/s ∼81% -17%
245
cd/m²
258
cd/m²
255
cd/m²
252
cd/m²
266
cd/m²
261
cd/m²
233
cd/m²
247
cd/m²
253
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
Sharp LQ156M1JW09 (SHP14D3)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 266 cd/m² Médio: 252.2 cd/m² Minimum: 15 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
Contraste: 985:1 (Preto: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.81 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1, calibrated: 1.03
ΔE Greyscale 2.44 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
97% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
Sharp LQ156M1JW09 (SHP14D3), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Aorus 15 X9
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Schenker XMG Neo 17
BOEhydis NV173FHM-N44 (BOE07B6), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
MSI GE75 8SF
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Response Times
1%
-8%
-37%
19%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
17.2 (9.2, 8)
15.2 (8.4, 6.8)
12%
16.4 (8.8, 7.6)
5%
18.8 (9.6, 9.2)
-9%
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
44%
Response Time Black / White *
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
12.4 (7.6, 4.8)
-11%
13.6 (8.4, 5.2)
-21%
12 (6.8, 5.2)
-7%
10.4 (5.2, 5.2)
7%
PWM Frequency
24040 (29)
971 (99)
-96%
25770 (17)
7%
Screen
-14%
5%
-13%
14%
Brightness middle
266
305.1
15%
250
-6%
304
14%
370.4
39%
Brightness
252
295
17%
235
-7%
289
15%
348
38%
Brightness Distribution
88
78
-11%
85
-3%
90
2%
89
1%
Black Level *
0.27
0.33
-22%
0.29
-7%
0.26
4%
0.29
-7%
Contrast
985
925
-6%
862
-12%
1169
19%
1277
30%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.81
2.58
-43%
1.46
19%
2.65
-46%
1.26
30%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.23
4.32
-34%
2.47
24%
6.11
-89%
3.02
7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.03
1.33
-29%
1.5
-46%
1.21
-17%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.44
3.4
-39%
1.27
48%
2.75
-13%
1.4
43%
Gamma
2.42 91%
2.28 96%
2.4 92%
2.46 89%
2.2 100%
CCT
7005 93%
6374 102%
6749 96%
6763 96%
6747 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
62
60.7
-2%
60
-3%
60
-3%
59.7
-4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
97
95.2
-2%
93
-4%
92
-5%
94.4
-3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-7% / -12%
-2% / 3%
-25% / -19%
17% / 15%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
17.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 24040 Hz ≤ 29 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 24040 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 29 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 24040 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9448 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

 
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280129013001310132013301340135013601370138013901400141014201430144014501460147014801490150015101520153015401550Tooltip
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW Intel Core i9-9880H, Intel Core i9-9880H: Ø1267 (1239.62-1311.65)
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø969 (904.79-1042.12)
MSI GE75 8SF Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø918 (910.89-1045.5)
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 Intel Core i9-9880H, Intel Core i9-9880H: Ø1439 (1417.84-1545.36)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H
196 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H
  (183 - 197, n=5)
191 Points ∼97% +4%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
Intel Core i9-9880H
183 Points ∼93%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼89% -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points ∼85% -9%
MSI GE75 8SF
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points ∼85% -9%
Aorus 15 X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points ∼85% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 212, n=496)
155 Points ∼79% -15%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-9880H
  (1401 - 1721, n=5)
1573 Points ∼100% +12%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H
1545 Points ∼98% +10%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
Intel Core i9-9880H
1401 Points ∼89%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
1156 Points ∼73% -17%
MSI GE75 8SF
Intel Core i7-8750H
1066 Points ∼68% -24%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H
1042 Points ∼66% -26%
Aorus 15 X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
1022 Points ∼65% -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2022, n=499)
814 Points ∼52% -42%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
183 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1401 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
129.21 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Aorus 15 X9
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
8408 Points ∼100% +15%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9880H, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW010T8
7311 Points ∼87%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
7161 Points ∼85% -2%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6734 Points ∼80% -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
6618 Points ∼79% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1764 - 11191, n=188)
6302 Points ∼75% -14%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
6161 Points ∼73% -16%
Productivity
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9880H, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW010T8
8025 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
7315 Points ∼91% -9%
Aorus 15 X9
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
7299 Points ∼91% -9%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
7218 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (4175 - 8968, n=189)
7159 Points ∼89% -11%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
7113 Points ∼89% -11%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
5986 Points ∼75% -25%
Essentials
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9880H, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW010T8
9146 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
8980 Points ∼98% -2%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
8961 Points ∼98% -2%
Aorus 15 X9
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
8943 Points ∼98% -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
8600 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (4892 - 10668, n=190)
8429 Points ∼92% -8%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
8277 Points ∼90% -10%
Score
Aorus 15 X9
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5870 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9880H, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW010T8
5826 Points ∼99%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5411 Points ∼92% -7%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5353 Points ∼91% -8%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
5211 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7171, n=191)
5188 Points ∼88% -11%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
5138 Points ∼88% -12%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9880H, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW010T8
5919 Points ∼100%
Aorus 15 X9
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5828 Points ∼98% -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5645 Points ∼95% -5%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
5338 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=375)
5022 Points ∼85% -15%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
4482 Points ∼76% -24%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Aorus 15 X9
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
4843 Points ∼100% +6%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9880H, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW010T8
4578 Points ∼95%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
4338 Points ∼90% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (3638 - 6093, n=393)
4245 Points ∼88% -7%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
3662 Points ∼76% -20%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
3505 Points ∼72% -23%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4578 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5919 pontos
Ajuda
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW010T8
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
MSI GE75 8SF
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
Aorus 15 X9
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
1%
-39%
21%
-9%
Write 4K
135
92.74
-31%
73.33
-46%
147.2
9%
97.13
-28%
Read 4K
54.91
41.4
-25%
33.35
-39%
63.65
16%
53.66
-2%
Write Seq
1649
1363
-17%
848.5
-49%
1573
-5%
1526
-7%
Read Seq
1449
1259
-13%
963.6
-33%
2602
80%
2020
39%
Write 4K Q32T1
507.6
289.7
-43%
236.2
-53%
530.5
5%
285.6
-44%
Read 4K Q32T1
558.9
337.5
-40%
384.7
-31%
597.6
7%
321.8
-42%
Write Seq Q32T1
1759
3332
89%
867.4
-51%
1592
-9%
1533
-13%
Read Seq Q32T1
1826
3477
90%
1586
-13%
2981
63%
2351
29%
AS SSD
109%
-14%
32%
31%
Copy Game MB/s
380.55
1070.93
936.25
Copy Program MB/s
531.71
404.34
362.56
Copy ISO MB/s
1121.28
1328.83
1863.91
Score Total
2033
5248
158%
2109
4%
2544
25%
2722
34%
Score Write
867
2413
178%
799
-8%
859
-1%
957
10%
Score Read
768
1869
143%
869
13%
1116
45%
1180
54%
Access Time Write *
0.043
0.03
30%
0.059
-37%
0.031
28%
0.034
21%
Access Time Read *
0.128
0.048
62%
0.173
-35%
0.049
62%
0.114
11%
4K-64 Write
602.9
2048.1
240%
650.03
8%
584
-3%
702.74
17%
4K-64 Read
583.37
1579.26
171%
748.37
28%
868.5
49%
913.55
57%
4K Write
105.06
117.57
12%
67.12
-36%
119.55
14%
107.12
2%
4K Read
26.79
53.48
100%
25.36
-5%
56.55
111%
55.04
105%
Seq Write
1590.95
2468.54
55%
822.99
-48%
1553.41
-2%
1471.06
-8%
Seq Read
1574.03
2359.28
50%
948.8
-40%
1912.12
21%
2112.83
34%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
55% / 64%
-27% / -25%
27% / 27%
11% / 14%

* ... smaller is better

Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW010T8
Sequential Read: 1326 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1519 MB/s
512K Read: 819.6 MB/s
512K Write: 1370 MB/s
4K Read: 29.57 MB/s
4K Write: 117.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 563.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 529.9 MB/s
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI GE75 8SF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
7789 Points ∼100% +11%
Aorus 15 X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
7754 Points ∼100% +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
  (7006 - 8000, n=9)
7532 Points ∼97% +8%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
7006 Points ∼90%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6562 Points ∼84% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (5699 - 13013, n=138)
5577 Points ∼72% -20%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GE75 8SF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
20236 Points ∼100% +11%
Aorus 15 X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
20227 Points ∼100% +11%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
19800 Points ∼98% +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
  (18169 - 21138, n=10)
19727 Points ∼97% +9%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
18169 Points ∼90%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17598 Points ∼87% -3%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
16100 Points ∼80% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=521)
11180 Points ∼55% -38%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Aorus 15 X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
26645 Points ∼100% +14%
MSI GE75 8SF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
26097 Points ∼98% +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
  (23335 - 26975, n=12)
25340 Points ∼95% +9%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
25248 Points ∼95% +8%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
23335 Points ∼88%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22089 Points ∼83% -5%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
20837 Points ∼78% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=596)
13146 Points ∼49% -44%
3DMark 11 Performance
19674 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
37721 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
16068 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
6909 pontos
Ajuda
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Schenker XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
73 fps ∼100% +9%
Aorus 15 X9
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
71.8 fps ∼98% +7%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
70.9 fps ∼97% +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
  (64 - 73.8, n=10)
70.8 fps ∼97% +6%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9880H
67 (min: 55) fps ∼92%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
58.3 (min: 48) fps ∼80% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=290)
48.9 fps ∼67% -27%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9880H
167.38 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
  (137 - 188, n=5)
164 fps ∼98% -2%
Aorus 15 X9
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
154.3 fps ∼92% -8%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
136.9 fps ∼82% -18%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
127.7 fps ∼76% -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.7 - 266, n=329)
96.4 fps ∼58% -42%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9880H
117.1 (min: 100.9) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
  (109 - 117, n=2)
113 fps ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (14 - 125, n=22)
94.9 fps ∼81% -19%
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9880H, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW010T8: Ø66.4 (62-71)
baixo média alto ultra

Barulho

Ocioso
30 / 37 / 39 dB
Carga
54 / 54 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
 42 °C42 °C51 °C 
 37 °C41 °C50 °C 
 32 °C32 °C31 °C 
Máximo: 51 °C
Médio: 39.8 °C
45 °C47 °C49 °C
42 °C46 °C43 °C
32 °C33 °C31 °C
Máximo: 49 °C
Médio: 40.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  43 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 39.5 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 42.1 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-4.2 °C / -7.6 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.237.52539.442.73131.235.1403043.65030.139.16327.939.98027.241.610026.753.712524.957.716024.76720022.762.825021.967.131520.466.540019.165.950019.27163018.572.980017.274.610001772.3125019.472.2160018.174.8200016.675.3250017.273.1315017.170400016.867.250001769.4630016.762.8800016.568.51000016.5681250016.556.91600016.449.7SPL29.883.8N1.361.8median 17.2median 68Delta2.24.237.246.632.738.32731.232.838.327.335.82643.627.352.225.764.323.669.424.167.323.669.422.56920.468.519.465.31966.817.970.518.572.518.371.317.769.61768.51765.517.664.117.363.517.360.517.458.117.359.217.358.217.262.917.155.417.144.129.9791.348.1median 17.7median 65.51.74.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus Strix Scar III G531GWAsus GL504GS
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Asus GL504GS audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 2.4 / 2.7 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 29 / 32 / 37 Watt
Carga midlight 157 / 217 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
Schenker XMG Neo 17
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
MSI GE75 8SF
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
Aorus 15 X9
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
33%
21%
8%
38%
26%
Idle Minimum *
29
13
55%
16.4
43%
26
10%
16
45%
19.5 (3.5 - 113, n=679)
33%
Idle Average *
32
16
50%
21.9
32%
30.8
4%
18
44%
25 (6.8 - 119, n=679)
22%
Idle Maximum *
37
21
43%
25.4
31%
34.9
6%
23
38%
30.2 (8.3 - 122, n=679)
18%
Load Average *
157
96
39%
90.7
42%
90.7
42%
88
44%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=670)
34%
Load Maximum *
217
191
12%
222.9
-3%
241.2
-11%
167
23%
170 (21.9 - 590, n=669)
22%
Witcher 3 ultra *
173
172
1%
203.3
-18%
175
-1%
120
31%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
5h 28min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
2h 57min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 21min
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW
9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 66 Wh
Schenker XMG Neo 17
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 46.74 Wh
MSI GE75 8SF
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 65 Wh
Aorus 15 X9
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 62 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-3%
20%
-46%
99%
15%
Reader / Idle
328
315
-4%
105
-68%
549
67%
342 (39 - 1174, n=649)
4%
WiFi v1.3
177
224
27%
212
20%
95
-46%
382
116%
254 (78 - 622, n=341)
44%
Load
81
55
-32%
61
-25%
174
115%
79 (18 - 202, n=615)
-2%

Pro

+ Boas opções de manutenção e de reparação
+ Bom alto-falantes
+ Iluminação RGB que chama a atenção
+ Teclado numérico integrado no trackpad
+ Segurança Keystone

Contra

- Duração fraca da bateria
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
- Ventiladores estrondosos
- Desempenho gráfico abaixo do esperado para um portátil com tecnologia RTX 2070
The ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW laptop review. Test device courtesy of ASUS Germany.
The ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW laptop review. Test device courtesy of ASUS Germany.

O ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G531WG é um portátil de jogos sólido. Como era de se esperar, os modernos jogos triple-A rodam sem problemas em sua tela Full HD de 240 Hz, enquanto a GPU RTX 2070 é poderosa para lidar com jogos em 4K também em monitores externos. O laptop é fácil de reparar e manter também, e somos fãs da inclusão da segurança Keystone. O teclado numérico integrado no trackpad também é um toque agradável e distingue o ROG Strix de seus concorrentes.

O ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW é um sólido portátil para jogos de15,6 polegadas. No entanto, seus ventiladores barulhentos e o baixo desempenho da RTX 2070 impedem que ele alcance as melhores avaliações.

Lamentavelmente, o ROG Strix não teve o desempenho esperado nos benchmarks e nos nossos testes de jogos. Outros portáteis simplesmente têm mais desempenho com um hardware semelhante ao da nossa unidade de análise. Além disso, a ASUS equipou o dispositivo com ventiladores barulhentos, que abafam seus impressionantes alto-falantes. Infelizmente, você só poderá apreciar os alto-falantes quando não estiver jogando. É uma pena que a ASUS também não ofereça uma opção de tela 4K, já que o ROG Strix é poderoso o suficiente para reproduzir títulos triplo A modernos nessa resolução. No geral, o ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW tem muito a seu favor, mas é prejudicado por algumas deficiências significativas.

Asus Strix Scar III G531GW - 06/03/2019 v6
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
87 / 98 → 89%
Teclado
85%
Mouse
83%
Conectividade
59 / 81 → 73%
Peso
61 / 10-66 → 91%
Bateria
69%
Pantalha
84%
Desempenho do jogos
99%
Desempenho da aplicação
96%
Temperatura
83 / 95 → 87%
Ruído
55 / 90 → 61%
Audio
88%
Médio
79%
86%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G531GW (Core i9-9880H, RTX 2070)
Mike Wobker, 2019-06- 5 (Update: 2019-06- 6)