Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Core i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070) Tongfang GK7CP7S

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 03/25/2019

Recommended. Se está procurando um portátil para jogos simples e relativamente compacto, então o Schenker XMG Neo 17 pode ser o portátil para você. O portátil de 17,3 polegadas tem uma pontuação alta pelo seu poderoso hardware, seu painel de 144 Hz e seu teclado opto mecânico. No entanto, o Neo 17 pode competir com outros grandes portáteis de jogos em mais do que apenas especificações?

Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Tongfang GK7CP7S)
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Análises do: 1215 MHz, Memoría: 1440 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 419.35, Optimus
Memória
32768 MB 
, 2 x 16 GB SODIMM DDR4-2666, dual channel, all banks occupied
Pantalha
17.3 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, BOEhydis NV173FHM-N44 (BOE07B6), IPS, Full HD, 144 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, 1024 GB 
, 2 x M.2 Type 2280 drive bays & 1 x 2.5-inch drive bay
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC269 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Dedicated 3.5 mm headphone and microphone jacks, Card Reader: MMC, SD, SDHC, SDXC
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 27.5 x 396 x 261
Bateria
46.74 Wh, 4100 mAh Lítio-Polímero, 3-cells
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.1, Teclado: Optomechanical, RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 230 W power supply, mouse pad, cleaning cloth, keychain, XMG sticker, Recovery DVD, USB flash drive, 2.5-inch drive bay accessory, BullGuard Internet Security - 1-year license, Control Center, 36 Meses Garantia
peso
2.5 kg, Suprimento de energia: 680 g
Preço
2655 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

412.6 mm 304.9 mm 23 mm 2.8 kg399 mm 273 mm 26.4 mm 2.9 kg397 mm 268.5 mm 27.5 mm 2.6 kg396 mm 261 mm 27.5 mm 2.5 kg399 mm 272 mm 19 mm 2.6 kg
Left-hand side: Kensington Lock, Air intake, RJ45-LAN, USB 2.0 Type-A, Microphone jack, Headphone jack
Left-hand side: Kensington Lock, Air intake, RJ45-LAN, USB 2.0 Type-A, Microphone jack, Headphone jack
Right-hand side: Card reader, 2 x USB 3.0 Type-A
Right-hand side: Card reader, 2 x USB 3.0 Type-A
Rear: 2 x Mini DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.0, USB 3.0 Type-C, DC-in
Rear: 2 x Mini DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.0, USB 3.0 Type-C, DC-in
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 202, n=249)
92.3 MB/s ∼100% +17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80 MB/s ∼87% +1%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79 MB/s ∼86%
MSI GE75 8SF
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.2 MB/s ∼29% -66%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=247)
110 MB/s ∼100% +25%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88 MB/s ∼80%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85 MB/s ∼77% -3%
MSI GE75 8SF
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
33.25 MB/s ∼30% -62%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
679 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
663 MBit/s ∼98%
MSI GE75 8SF
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
658 MBit/s ∼97% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=272)
605 MBit/s ∼89% -9%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
599 MBit/s ∼88% -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
598 MBit/s ∼88% -10%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GE75 8SF
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
686 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
674 MBit/s ∼98%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
647 MBit/s ∼94% -4%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
605 MBit/s ∼88% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 749, n=272)
557 MBit/s ∼81% -17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
356 MBit/s ∼52% -47%
A look at the inside of the Schenker XMG Neo 17
The XMG Neo 17’s bottom case with a pre-applied thermal pad
Schenker has equipped our review unit with a 1 TB Samsung 970 Evo Plus SSD
A look at one of the XMG Neo 17’s two fans
There is space to add a second M.2 2280 SSD too
The XMG Neo 17 has two SODIMM slots that are hidden beneath black sheathing
The XMG Neo 17 has a 2.5-inch drive bay should you need to add more storage
The XMG Neo 17 has a 46.74 Wh Lithium Polymer battery
The XMG Neo 17 has a 46.74 Wh Lithium Polymer battery
285
cd/m²
283
cd/m²
274
cd/m²
302
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
281
cd/m²
289
cd/m²
287
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
BOEhydis NV173FHM-N44 (BOE07B6)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 304 cd/m² Médio: 288.8 cd/m² Minimum: 11 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 304 cd/m²
Contraste: 1169:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.65 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 1.5
ΔE Greyscale 2.75 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
92% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.46
Schenker XMG Neo 17
BOEhydis NV173FHM-N44 (BOE07B6), IPS, 1920x1080
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), AHVA, 1920x1080
MSI GE75 8SF
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, IPS, 1920x1080
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
AU Optronics B173HAN03.2, IPS, 1920x1080
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times
7%
872%
5%
41%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
18.8 (9.6, 9.2)
17.6 (8.4, 9.2)
6%
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
49%
15.6 (8, 7.6)
17%
7.2 (3.6, 3.6)
62%
Response Time Black / White *
12 (6.8, 5.2)
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
7%
10.4 (5.2, 5.2)
13%
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
-7%
9.6 (4.4, 5.2)
20%
PWM Frequency
971 (99)
25770 (17)
2554%
Screen
-6%
19%
-42%
4%
Brightness middle
304
295
-3%
370.4
22%
299.1
-2%
288
-5%
Brightness
289
291
1%
348
20%
273
-6%
287
-1%
Brightness Distribution
90
96
7%
89
-1%
81
-10%
91
1%
Black Level *
0.26
0.24
8%
0.29
-12%
0.27
-4%
0.2
23%
Contrast
1169
1229
5%
1277
9%
1108
-5%
1440
23%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.65
3.2
-21%
1.26
52%
5.07
-91%
2.33
12%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.11
6.64
-9%
3.02
51%
10.55
-73%
5.34
13%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.5
2.52
-68%
1.21
19%
3.31
-121%
2.47
-65%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.75
2.16
21%
1.4
49%
6.8
-147%
1.19
57%
Gamma
2.46 89%
2.46 89%
2.2 100%
2.46 89%
2.41 91%
CCT
6763 96%
6872 95%
6747 96%
7805 83%
6710 97%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
57
-5%
59.7
0%
58.5
-2%
57
-5%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
92
87
-5%
94.4
3%
89.9
-2%
88
-4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
1% / -4%
446% / 202%
-19% / -35%
23% / 10%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
18.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.6 ms rise
↘ 9.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 971 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 971 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 971 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9370 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
LatencyMon
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240Tooltip
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø969 (904.79-1042.12)
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1187 (1126.76-1226.54)
MSI GE75 8SF Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø918 (910.89-1045.5)
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1139 (1122.59-1232.82)
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1112 (1090.93-1218.55)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼100% 0%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼100%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
170 Points ∼98% -2%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Intel Core i7-8750H
167 Points ∼96% -4%
MSI GE75 8SF
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 212, n=520)
157 Points ∼90% -10%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Intel Core i7-8750H
1233 Points ∼100% +18%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
1218 Points ∼99% +17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H
1204 Points ∼98% +16%
MSI GE75 8SF
Intel Core i7-8750H
1066 Points ∼86% +2%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H
1042 Points ∼85%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2022, n=523)
830 Points ∼67% -20%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.98 Points ∼100%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.94 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.71 - 2.38, n=422)
1.69 Points ∼85% -15%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
13.5 Points ∼100% +17%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H
11.51 Points ∼85%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.13 - 21.4, n=523)
7.42 Points ∼55% -36%
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.98 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
11.51 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
174 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1042 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
6053 Points ∼100% +12%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5596 Points ∼92% +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5555 Points ∼92% +3%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5411 Points ∼89%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7171, n=216)
5222 Points ∼86% -3%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
5138 Points ∼85% -5%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
MSI GE75 8SF
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
AS SSD
-57%
-80%
-41%
-16%
Score Total
5248
1715
-67%
2109
-60%
2784
-47%
4771
-9%
Score Write
2413
942
-61%
799
-67%
1441
-40%
2091
-13%
Score Read
1869
510
-73%
869
-54%
878
-53%
1721
-8%
Access Time Write *
0.03
0.045
-50%
0.059
-97%
0.04
-33%
0.031
-3%
Access Time Read *
0.048
0.11
-129%
0.173
-260%
0.063
-31%
0.08
-67%
4K-64 Write
2048.1
726.69
-65%
650.03
-68%
1212.35
-41%
1733.9
-15%
4K-64 Read
1579.26
326.47
-79%
748.37
-53%
727.26
-54%
1576.8
0%
4K Write
117.57
122.81
4%
67.12
-43%
96.04
-18%
122.46
4%
4K Read
53.48
52.43
-2%
25.36
-53%
35.05
-34%
53.01
-1%
Seq Write
2468.54
927
-62%
822.99
-67%
1328.15
-46%
2347.01
-5%
Seq Read
2359.28
1315
-44%
948.8
-60%
1152.78
-51%
910.97
-61%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3477 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3332 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 337.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 289.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1259 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1363 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 41.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 92.74 MB/s
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
4655 Points ∼100% +13%
MSI GE75 8SF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
4231 Points ∼91% +3%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
4102 Points ∼88%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
4009 Points ∼86% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (1294 - 5942, n=58)
3967 Points ∼85% -3%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
21515 Points ∼100% +9%
MSI GE75 8SF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
20236 Points ∼94% +2%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
19800 Points ∼92%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
19236 Points ∼89% -3%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
18520 Points ∼86% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=547)
11401 Points ∼53% -42%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
29453 Points ∼100% +17%
MSI GE75 8SF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
26097 Points ∼89% +3%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
25765 Points ∼87% +2%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
25248 Points ∼86%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
24172 Points ∼82% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=622)
13475 Points ∼46% -47%
3DMark 11 Performance
18150 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
29348 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
15686 pontos
Ajuda
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Schenker XMG Neo 17 GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB: Ø73.8 (65-79)
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8: Ø70.1 (61-75)
MSI GE75 8SF GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1: Ø70.8 (55-76)
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ: Ø69.7 (63-76)
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø80.8 (71-85)
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
81.7 (min: 68) fps ∼100% +12%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
73.1 fps ∼89% 0%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
73 fps ∼89%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
71.8 fps ∼88% -2%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
70.9 fps ∼87% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=316)
49.8 fps ∼61% -32%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
151 (min: 123) fps ∼100% +10%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
144.2 fps ∼95% +5%
Schenker XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
137 fps ∼91%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
133.6 fps ∼88% -2%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
115.7 fps ∼77% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.1 - 194, n=270)
87.1 fps ∼58% -36%
baixo média alto ultraQHD4K
The Witcher 3 (2015) 1377349.5fps
Apex Legends (2019) 14313413288.245.4fps
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 9492827442fps
Metro Exodus (2019) 87.966.454.14226.1fps
Anthem (2019) 88.885.479.86235.5fps
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 14311775.262.1fps
The Division 2 (2019) 11395786033fps

Barulho

Ocioso
29 / 32 / 33 dB
Carga
42 / 49 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Schenker XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
-6%
-5%
6%
-2%
-2%
off / environment *
29
29
-0%
28.3
2%
28.3
2%
29
-0%
29.3 (27.7 - 32, n=319)
-1%
Idle Minimum *
29
29
-0%
33.5
-16%
31.5
-9%
29
-0%
31.4 (28 - 41.7, n=742)
-8%
Idle Average *
32
32
-0%
33.6
-5%
31.6
1%
32
-0%
32.6 (28 - 46.6, n=742)
-2%
Idle Maximum *
33
40
-21%
35
-6%
31.6
4%
33
-0%
34.6 (28 - 51, n=742)
-5%
Load Average *
42
46
-10%
38
10%
32.3
23%
47
-12%
40.7 (30.1 - 58, n=743)
3%
Witcher 3 ultra *
49
51
-4%
50
-2%
43
12%
49
-0%
Load Maximum *
49
52
-6%
56.9
-16%
45.5
7%
51
-4%
48.1 (38.9 - 64.1, n=743)
2%

* ... smaller is better

 45 °C47 °C44 °C 
 39 °C46 °C37 °C 
 31 °C35 °C33 °C 
Máximo: 47 °C
Médio: 39.7 °C
46 °C52 °C53 °C
45 °C56 °C39 °C
30 °C30 °C27 °C
Máximo: 56 °C
Médio: 42 °C
alimentação elétrica  48 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 42.2 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-6.2 °C / -11.2 F).
Schenker XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-14%
9%
4%
1%
-1%
Maximum Upper Side *
47
59
-26%
41.2
12%
38.6
18%
53
-13%
45.8 (28 - 68.8, n=708)
3%
Maximum Bottom *
56
54
4%
46
18%
43.6
22%
50
11%
49.6 (25.9 - 78, n=706)
11%
Idle Upper Side *
28
33
-18%
26.2
6%
30.2
-8%
27
4%
30.8 (21.6 - 46.8, n=659)
-10%
Idle Bottom *
30
35
-17%
30.2
-1%
35
-17%
30
-0%
31.8 (21.1 - 50.3, n=657)
-6%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2045.144.92539.840.53130.732.14036.235.35027.527.86325.928.68027.231.110025.236.612522.233.316021.243.42002249.625021.452.631520.354.640019.753.350018.455.363017.563.680017.262.8100017.261.7125017.860.5160017.456.8200017.357.825001855.3315017.750400017.854.5500017.749.3630017.452.2800017.549.61000017.4481250017.350.21600017.252.2SPL29.969.5N1.325median 17.7median 52.6Delta1.63.339.145.536.641.328.330.731.433.53627.826.73230.738.628.252.924.752.122.756.223.463.523.165.520.366.318.764.617.866.81868.317.368.617.468.617.966.717.765.817.165.217.265.317.466.117.362.517.66117.66017.362.117.357.917.251.417.143.129.977.41.343.6median 17.6median 64.61.74.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSchenker XMG Neo 17Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Schenker XMG Neo 17 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.5 / 1.8 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 13 / 16 / 21 Watt
Carga midlight 96 / 191 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Schenker XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-27%
-19%
-22%
-23%
-29%
Idle Minimum *
13
19
-46%
16.4
-26%
20.2
-55%
19
-46%
19.4 (3.4 - 113, n=702)
-49%
Idle Average *
16
22
-38%
21.9
-37%
27.2
-70%
22
-38%
24.9 (6.6 - 119, n=702)
-56%
Idle Maximum *
21
29
-38%
25.4
-21%
28.7
-37%
30
-43%
30.2 (8.3 - 122, n=702)
-44%
Load Average *
96
102
-6%
90.7
6%
90.8
5%
104
-8%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=693)
-8%
Load Maximum *
191
231
-21%
222.9
-17%
165.4
13%
203
-6%
171 (21.9 - 590, n=692)
10%
Witcher 3 ultra *
172
190
-10%
203.3
-18%
152.1
12%
167
3%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
5h 15min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
3h 44min
Carga (máximo brilho)
0h 55min
Schenker XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, 46.74 Wh
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, 66 Wh
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, 65 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 76 Wh
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 76 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
15%
-5%
-15%
-2%
23%
Reader / Idle
315
372
18%
298
-5%
347 (39 - 1174, n=667)
10%
WiFi v1.3
224
235
5%
212
-5%
190
-15%
230
3%
258 (78 - 622, n=367)
15%
Load
55
67
22%
52
-5%
78.9 (18 - 202, n=633)
43%
Witcher 3 ultra
52
56.5 (50 - 66, n=6)

Pro

+ highly configurable
+ mechanical keyboard
+ loads of accessories included
+ useful software
+ comparatively light for a 17.3-inch laptop
+ RGB keyboard backlighting
+ stable case
+ good IPS panel
+ powerful
+ slim display bezels
+ 144 Hz panel

Contra

- underwhelming trackpad
- high fan noise under load
- limited turbo CPU clock speeds
- disappointing Wi-Fi performance
- speakers could be better
- no Thunderbolt 3
- small battery

Error: More than one (2) Pro / Contra Item for this review found!

The Schenker XMG Neo 17 laptop review. Test device courtesy of Schenker Technologies.
The Schenker XMG Neo 17 laptop review. Test device courtesy of Schenker Technologies.

O Schenker XMG Neo 17 é em grande parte um excelente portátil para jogos de 17 polegadas. A tela é um deleite com sua alta relação de contraste e taxa de atualização de 144 Hz, juntamente com seus marcos finos. Além disso, impressionou nos nossos testes de jogos graças à sua GPU RTX 2070, enquanto o seu teclado RGB mecânico é um prazer para a digitação.

Além disso, o Neo 17 é quase livremente configurável e vem com uma tonelada de acessórios, o sempre são bem-vindos. A carcaça Tongfang Barebones é comparativamente compacta e leve também, embora seja bastante grossa.

No entanto, Schenker precisaria abordar várias áreas para alcançar as melhores pontuações. Em primeiro lugar, o sucessor do Neo 17 precisaria de pelo menos a opção para uma bateria maior, juntamente com um melhor trackpad e alto-falantes. Além disso, a empresa precisaria reposicionar a placa Wi-Fi para aproveitar ao máximo seu potencial e ajustar o controle do ventilador para utilizar o turbo da CPU no modo de ventilador balanceado. No geral, essas deficiências não impedem que o XMG Neo 17 receba uma pontuação média decente, mas o impedem de ser o portátil de jogos de 17 polegadas para bater este ano.

Schenker XMG Neo 17 - 09/20/2019 v7
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
80 / 98 → 82%
Teclado
89%
Mouse
72%
Conectividade
60 / 80 → 75%
Peso
60 / 10-66 → 89%
Bateria
56 / 95 → 59%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
92%
Desempenho da aplicação
90%
Temperatura
83 / 95 → 88%
Ruído
80 / 90 → 89%
Audio
60%
Médio
76%
84%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Core i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070) Tongfang GK7CP7S
Florian Glaser, 2019-03-25 (Update: 2019-03-26)