Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Core i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070) Tongfang GK7CP7S

Recommended. Se está procurando um portátil para jogos simples e relativamente compacto, então o Schenker XMG Neo 17 pode ser o portátil para você. O portátil de 17,3 polegadas tem uma pontuação alta pelo seu poderoso hardware, seu painel de 144 Hz e seu teclado opto mecânico. No entanto, o Neo 17 pode competir com outros grandes portáteis de jogos em mais do que apenas especificações?
Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Tongfang GK7CP7S)
Processador
Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1215 MHz, Memoría: 1440 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 419.35, Optimus
Memória
32 GB 
, 2 x 16 GB SODIMM DDR4-2666, dual channel, all banks occupied
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, BOEhydis NV173FHM-N44 (BOE07B6), IPS, Full HD, 144 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, 1024 GB 
, 2 x M.2 Type 2280 drive bays & 1 x 2.5-inch drive bay
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC269 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Dedicated 3.5 mm headphone and microphone jacks, Card Reader: MMC, SD, SDHC, SDXC
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 27.5 x 396 x 261
Bateria
46.74 Wh, 4100 mAh Lítio-Polímero, 3-cells
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.1, Teclado: Optomechanical, RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 230 W power supply, mouse pad, cleaning cloth, keychain, XMG sticker, Recovery DVD, USB flash drive, 2.5-inch drive bay accessory, BullGuard Internet Security - 1-year license, Control Center, 36 Meses Garantia
peso
2.5 kg, Suprimento de energia: 680 g
Preço
2655 EUR
Links
SCHENKER página inicial
SCHENKER Seção de notebook
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

❌
412.6 mm 304.9 mm 23 mm 2.8 kg399 mm 273 mm 26.4 mm 2.9 kg397 mm 268.5 mm 27.5 mm 2.6 kg396 mm 261 mm 27.5 mm 2.5 kg399 mm 272 mm 19 mm 2.6 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Left-hand side: Kensington Lock, Air intake, RJ45-LAN, USB 2.0 Type-A, Microphone jack, Headphone jack
Left-hand side: Kensington Lock, Air intake, RJ45-LAN, USB 2.0 Type-A, Microphone jack, Headphone jack
Right-hand side: Card reader, 2 x USB 3.0 Type-A
Right-hand side: Card reader, 2 x USB 3.0 Type-A
Rear: 2 x Mini DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.0, USB 3.0 Type-C, DC-in
Rear: 2 x Mini DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.0, USB 3.0 Type-C, DC-in
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years)
98.4 MB/s +25%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79 MB/s
MSI GE75 8SF
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.2 MB/s -66%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=94, last 2 years)
121.3 MB/s +38%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85 MB/s -3%
MSI GE75 8SF
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
33.25 MB/s -62%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average of class Gaming
  (885 - 1412, n=4, last 2 years)
1139 MBit/s +69%
MSI GE75 8SF
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
686 MBit/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
674 MBit/s
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
647 MBit/s -4%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
605 MBit/s -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
356 MBit/s -47%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Gaming
  (881 - 1700, n=4, last 2 years)
1379 MBit/s +108%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
679 MBit/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
663 MBit/s
MSI GE75 8SF
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
658 MBit/s -1%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
599 MBit/s -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
598 MBit/s -10%
A look at the inside of the Schenker XMG Neo 17
The XMG Neo 17’s bottom case with a pre-applied thermal pad
Schenker has equipped our review unit with a 1 TB Samsung 970 Evo Plus SSD
A look at one of the XMG Neo 17’s two fans
There is space to add a second M.2 2280 SSD too
The XMG Neo 17 has two SODIMM slots that are hidden beneath black sheathing
The XMG Neo 17 has a 2.5-inch drive bay should you need to add more storage
The XMG Neo 17 has a 46.74 Wh Lithium Polymer battery
The XMG Neo 17 has a 46.74 Wh Lithium Polymer battery
285
cd/m²		283
cd/m²		274
cd/m²
302
cd/m²		304
cd/m²		294
cd/m²
281
cd/m²		289
cd/m²		287
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
BOEhydis NV173FHM-N44 (BOE07B6) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 304 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 288.8 cd/m² Minimum: 11 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 304 cd/m²
Contraste: 1169:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.65 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.5
ΔE Greyscale 2.75 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.46
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
BOEhydis NV173FHM-N44 (BOE07B6), IPS, 1920x1080		Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), AHVA, 1920x1080		MSI GE75 8SF
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, IPS, 1920x1080		Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
AU Optronics B173HAN03.2, IPS, 1920x1080		Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 1920x1080
Display
-5%
-1%
-2%
-4%
Display P3 Coverage
65.2
62.9
-4%
63.1
-3%
64
-2%
62.9
-4%
sRGB Coverage
92.2
87.1
-6%
94.4
2%
90.4
-2%
87.8
-5%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
66.5
63.7
-4%
65.2
-2%
64.8
-3%
63.9
-4%
Response Times
7%
872%
5%
41%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
18.8 ?(9.6, 9.2)
17.6 ?(8.4, 9.2)
6%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
49%
15.6 ?(8, 7.6)
17%
7.2 ?(3.6, 3.6)
62%
Response Time Black / White *
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
11.2 ?(6.8, 4.4)
7%
10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2)
13%
12.8 ?(7.6, 5.2)
-7%
9.6 ?(4.4, 5.2)
20%
PWM Frequency
971 ?(99)
25770 ?(17)
2554%
Screen
-6%
19%
-42%
4%
Brightness middle
304
295
-3%
370.4
22%
299.1
-2%
288
-5%
Brightness
289
291
1%
348
20%
273
-6%
287
-1%
Brightness Distribution
90
96
7%
89
-1%
81
-10%
91
1%
Black Level *
0.26
0.24
8%
0.29
-12%
0.27
-4%
0.2
23%
Contrast
1169
1229
5%
1277
9%
1108
-5%
1440
23%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.65
3.2
-21%
1.26
52%
5.07
-91%
2.33
12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.11
6.64
-9%
3.02
51%
10.55
-73%
5.34
13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.5
2.52
-68%
1.21
19%
3.31
-121%
2.47
-65%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.75
2.16
21%
1.4
49%
6.8
-147%
1.19
57%
Gamma
2.46 89%
2.46 89%
2.2 100%
2.46 89%
2.41 91%
CCT
6763 96%
6872 95%
6747 96%
7805 83%
6710 97%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
57
-5%
59.7
0%
58.5
-2%
57
-5%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
92
87
-5%
94.4
3%
89.9
-2%
88
-4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-1% / -4%
297% / 166%
-13% / -29%
14% / 7%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
18.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.6 ms rise
↘ 9.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 971 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 971 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 971 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
LatencyMon
065130195260325390455520585650715780845910975104011051170Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø969 (904.79-1042.12)
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1187 (1126.76-1226.54)
MSI GE75 8SF Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø918 (910.89-1045.5)
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1139 (1122.59-1232.82)
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1112 (1090.93-1218.55)
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=231, last 2 years)
268 Points +54%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
170 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Intel Core i7-8750H
167 Points -4%
MSI GE75 8SF
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points -5%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=232, last 2 years)
3090 Points +197%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Intel Core i7-8750H
1233 Points +18%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H
1227 Points +18%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
1218 Points +17%
MSI GE75 8SF
Intel Core i7-8750H
1066 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H
1042 Points
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (2.62 - 3.73, n=23, last 2 years)
3.21 Points +62%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.98 Points
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.94 Points -2%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 64.3, n=24, last 2 years)
35.6 Points +209%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
13.5 Points +17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
Intel Core i7-8750H
11.51 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.98 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
11.51 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
174 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1042 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=199, last 2 years)
7588 Points +40%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
6053 Points +12%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5596 Points +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5555 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5411 Points
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
5138 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB		Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8		MSI GE75 8SF
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1		Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ		Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
AS SSD
-57%
-80%
-41%
-16%
Seq Read
2359
1315
-44%
949
-60%
1153
-51%
911
-61%
Seq Write
2469
927
-62%
823
-67%
1328
-46%
2347
-5%
4K Read
53.5
52.4
-2%
25.36
-53%
35.05
-34%
53
-1%
4K Write
117.6
122.8
4%
67.1
-43%
96
-18%
122.5
4%
4K-64 Read
1579
326.5
-79%
748
-53%
727
-54%
1577
0%
4K-64 Write
2048
727
-65%
650
-68%
1212
-41%
1734
-15%
Access Time Read *
0.048
0.11
-129%
0.173
-260%
0.063
-31%
0.08
-67%
Access Time Write *
0.03
0.045
-50%
0.059
-97%
0.04
-33%
0.031
-3%
Score Read
1869
510
-73%
869
-54%
878
-53%
1721
-8%
Score Write
2413
942
-61%
799
-67%
1441
-40%
2091
-13%
Score Total
5248
1715
-67%
2109
-60%
2784
-47%
4771
-9%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3477 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3332 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 337.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 289.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1259 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1363 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 41.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 92.7 MB/s
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=235, last 2 years)
29450 Points +49%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
21515 Points +9%
MSI GE75 8SF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
20236 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
19800 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
19236 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
18520 Points -6%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (280 - 14457, n=155, last 2 years)
7720 Points +88%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
4655 Points +13%
MSI GE75 8SF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
4231 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
4102 Points
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
4009 Points -2%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=231, last 2 years)
40470 Points +60%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
29453 Points +17%
MSI GE75 8SF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
26097 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
25765 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
25248 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
24172 Points -4%
3DMark 11 Performance
18150 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
29348 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
15686 pontos
Ajuda
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB: Ø73.8 (65-79)
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8: Ø70.1 (61-75)
MSI GE75 8SF GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1: Ø70.8 (55-76)
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ: Ø69.7 (63-76)
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø80.8 (71-85)
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 449, n=166, last 2 years)
220 fps +61%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
151 (123min) fps +10%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
144.2 fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
137 fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
133.6 fps -2%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
115.7 fps -16%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=226, last 2 years)
117.1 fps +60%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
81.7 (68min) fps +12%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
73.1 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
73 fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
71.8 fps -2%
MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
70.9 fps -3%
baixo média alto ultraQHD4K
The Witcher 3 (2015) 137 73 49.5
Apex Legends (2019) 143 134 132 88.2 45.4
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 94 92 82 74 42
Metro Exodus (2019) 87.9 66.4 54.1 42 26.1
Anthem (2019) 88.8 85.4 79.8 62 35.5
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 143 117 75.2 62.1
The Division 2 (2019) 113 95 78 60 33

Barulho

Ocioso
29 / 32 / 33 dB
Carga
42 / 49 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H		Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H		MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H		Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
-6%
-5%
6%
-2%
6%
off / environment *
29
29
-0%
28.3
2%
28.3
2%
29
-0%
24.1 ?(19.5 - 29.9, n=183, last 2 years)
17%
Idle Minimum *
29
29
-0%
33.5
-16%
31.5
-9%
29
-0%
25.6 ?(21.9 - 41.6, n=185, last 2 years)
12%
Idle Average *
32
32
-0%
33.6
-5%
31.6
1%
32
-0%
27.4 ?(21.9 - 42.1, n=185, last 2 years)
14%
Idle Maximum *
33
40
-21%
35
-6%
31.6
4%
33
-0%
30.7 ?(21.9 - 47, n=185, last 2 years)
7%
Load Average *
42
46
-10%
38
10%
32.3
23%
47
-12%
43.1 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=185, last 2 years)
-3%
Witcher 3 ultra *
49
51
-4%
50
-2%
43
12%
49
-0%
Load Maximum *
49
52
-6%
56.9
-16%
45.5
7%
51
-4%
53.4 ?(42.1 - 68.2, n=185, last 2 years)
-9%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 45 °C47 °C44 °C 
 39 °C46 °C37 °C 
 31 °C35 °C33 °C 
Máximo: 47 °C
Médio: 39.7 °C
46 °C52 °C53 °C
45 °C56 °C39 °C
30 °C30 °C27 °C
Máximo: 56 °C
Médio: 42 °C
alimentação elétrica  48 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H		Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H		MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H		Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-14%
9%
4%
1%
-2%
Maximum Upper Side *
47
59
-26%
41.2
12%
38.6
18%
53
-13%
46 ?(28.2 - 60, n=183, last 2 years)
2%
Maximum Bottom *
56
54
4%
46
18%
43.6
22%
50
11%
49.5 ?(30 - 66.3, n=183, last 2 years)
12%
Idle Upper Side *
28
33
-18%
26.2
6%
30.2
-8%
27
4%
31.4 ?(21.2 - 42.8, n=183, last 2 years)
-12%
Idle Bottom *
30
35
-17%
30.2
-1%
35
-17%
30
-0%
32.5 ?(22.6 - 45, n=183, last 2 years)
-8%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2045.144.92539.840.53130.732.14036.235.35027.527.86325.928.68027.231.110025.236.612522.233.316021.243.42002249.625021.452.631520.354.640019.753.350018.455.363017.563.680017.262.8100017.261.7125017.860.5160017.456.8200017.357.825001855.3315017.750400017.854.5500017.749.3630017.452.2800017.549.61000017.4481250017.350.21600017.252.2SPL29.969.5N1.325median 17.7median 52.6Delta1.63.339.145.536.641.328.330.731.433.53627.826.73230.738.628.252.924.752.122.756.223.463.523.165.520.366.318.764.617.866.81868.317.368.617.468.617.966.717.765.817.165.217.265.317.466.117.362.517.66117.66017.362.117.357.917.251.417.143.129.977.41.343.6median 17.6median 64.61.74.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG Neo 17Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.5 / 1.8 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 13 / 16 / 21 Watt
Carga midlight 96 / 191 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H		Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H		MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H		Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-27%
-19%
-22%
-23%
-20%
Idle Minimum *
13
19
-46%
16.4
-26%
20.2
-55%
19
-46%
13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=179, last 2 years)
-6%
Idle Average *
16
22
-38%
21.9
-37%
27.2
-70%
22
-38%
19.2 ?(8 - 67, n=179, last 2 years)
-20%
Idle Maximum *
21
29
-38%
25.4
-21%
28.7
-37%
30
-43%
27 ?(9 - 101.1, n=179, last 2 years)
-29%
Load Average *
96
102
-6%
90.7
6%
90.8
5%
104
-8%
111.3 ?(32.1 - 202, n=178, last 2 years)
-16%
Witcher 3 ultra *
172
190
-10%
203.3
-18%
152.1
12%
167
3%
Load Maximum *
191
231
-21%
222.9
-17%
165.4
13%
203
-6%
251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=177, last 2 years)
-31%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
5h 15min
WiFi Websurfing
3h 44min
Carga (máximo brilho)
0h 55min
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, 46.74 Wh		Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, 66 Wh		MSI GE75 8SF
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, 65 Wh		Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 76 Wh		Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 76 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
15%
-5%
-15%
-2%
63%
Reader / Idle
315
372
18%
298
-5%
544 ?(57 - 1290, n=83, last 2 years)
73%
WiFi v1.3
224
235
5%
212
-5%
190
-15%
230
3%
368 ?(57 - 745, n=181, last 2 years)
64%
Load
55
67
22%
52
-5%
84.2 ?(36 - 173, n=143, last 2 years)
53%
Witcher 3 ultra
52
80.6 ?(47 - 155, n=23, last 2 years)

Pro

+ highly configurable
+ mechanical keyboard
+ loads of accessories included
+ useful software
+ comparatively light for a 17.3-inch laptop
+ RGB keyboard backlighting
+ stable case
+ good IPS panel
+ powerful
+ slim display bezels
+ 144 Hz panel

Contra

- underwhelming trackpad
- high fan noise under load
- limited turbo CPU clock speeds
- disappointing Wi-Fi performance
- speakers could be better
- no Thunderbolt 3
- small battery

Error: More than one (2) Pro / Contra Item for this review found!

The Schenker XMG Neo 17 laptop review. Test device courtesy of Schenker Technologies.
The Schenker XMG Neo 17 laptop review. Test device courtesy of Schenker Technologies.

O Schenker XMG Neo 17 é em grande parte um excelente portátil para jogos de 17 polegadas. A tela é um deleite com sua alta relação de contraste e taxa de atualização de 144 Hz, juntamente com seus marcos finos. Além disso, impressionou nos nossos testes de jogos graças à sua GPU RTX 2070, enquanto o seu teclado RGB mecânico é um prazer para a digitação.

Além disso, o Neo 17 é quase livremente configurável e vem com uma tonelada de acessórios, o sempre são bem-vindos. A carcaça Tongfang Barebones é comparativamente compacta e leve também, embora seja bastante grossa.

No entanto, Schenker precisaria abordar várias áreas para alcançar as melhores pontuações. Em primeiro lugar, o sucessor do Neo 17 precisaria de pelo menos a opção para uma bateria maior, juntamente com um melhor trackpad e alto-falantes. Além disso, a empresa precisaria reposicionar a placa Wi-Fi para aproveitar ao máximo seu potencial e ajustar o controle do ventilador para utilizar o turbo da CPU no modo de ventilador balanceado. No geral, essas deficiências não impedem que o XMG Neo 17 receba uma pontuação média decente, mas o impedem de ser o portátil de jogos de 17 polegadas para bater este ano.

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 - 05/14/2020 v7
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
80 / 98 → 82%
Teclado
89%
Mouse
72%
Conectividade
60 / 80 → 75%
Peso
60 / 10-66 → 89%
Bateria
56 / 95 → 59%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
92%
Desempenho da aplicação
90%
Temperatura
83 / 95 → 88%
Ruído
80 / 90 → 89%
Audio
60%
Camera
43 / 85 → 50%
Médio
73%
83%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

More articles related to this device

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Uniwill Technology Serie)
Notícias
•
27 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX PCs cont...
|
Análise
•
Estreia do Intel Core i9-12900...
|
Análise
•
Schenker XMG NEO 17 com RTX 30...
|
Notícias
•
Explora totalmente o RTX 3070:...
|
Análise
•
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Tongfang ...
|
Notícias
•
Um verdadeiro lobo em pele de ...
|
Análise
•
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (2020, Ton...
|
Análise
•
Breve Análise do Portátil Sche...

Pricecompare

Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Schenker XMG Neo 17
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Core i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070) Tongfang GK7CP7S
Florian Glaser, 2019-03-25 (Update: 2019-03-26)