Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil MSI P65 Creator 9SF (i9-9880H, RTX2070 Max-Q)

Mike Wobker, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 06/05/2019

Para criativos que precisam de desempenho. O MSI P65 Creator é direcionado para criadores de conteúdo que precisam de um portátil com muita potência de hardware. Mas os jogadores ficarão igualmente satisfeitos com este dispositivo graças à placa gráfica RTX incluída - particularmente porque ele vem com um design mais simples do que a maioria dos dispositivos de jogos. Descubra o que mais o smartphone acessível tem a oferecer em nossa análise.

MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 (P65 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i9-9880H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Análises do: 300 MHz, Memoría: 405 MHz, TU106M, GeForce 430.64, Intel UHD Graphics 630
Memória
32768 MB 
, Dual-Channel, DDR4 SDRAM
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 283 PPI, AU Optronics AUO41EB, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Disco rígido
2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0),  GB 
, 880 GB livre
Placa de Som
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Conexões
3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 1x microfone, 1x fone, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Qualcomm Atheros AR8171/8175 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 18 x 357 x 247
Bateria
82 Wh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, MSI Creator Center, MSI Driver & App Helper, Photo Director 8, Power Director, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
1.9 kg, Suprimento de energia: 908 g
Preço
3200 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657

Size Comparison

386 mm 262 mm 38 mm 3.5 kg360 mm 252 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg357 mm 247 mm 18 mm 1.9 kg356 mm 250 mm 18.9 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 17.8 mm 2.1 kg
Left: Kensington Lock, RJ45-LAN, 2x USB 3.1, headphones, microphone
Left: Kensington Lock, RJ45-LAN, 2x USB 3.1, headphones, microphone
Right: USB 3.1, Thunderbolt 3, MiniDisplayPort, HDMI, DC-in
Right: USB 3.1, Thunderbolt 3, MiniDisplayPort, HDMI, DC-in
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
693 MBit/s ∼100% +41%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
684 MBit/s ∼99% +40%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
680 MBit/s ∼98% +39%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s ∼98% +38%
Average of class Multimedia
  (44 - 949, n=128)
495 MBit/s ∼71% +1%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
490 (min: 376, max: 596) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s ∼100% +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
680 MBit/s ∼100% +5%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
655 MBit/s ∼96% +1%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
654 MBit/s ∼96% +1%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
650 (min: 629, max: 713) MBit/s ∼95%
Average of class Multimedia
  (46.1 - 949, n=127)
473 MBit/s ∼69% -27%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø489 (376-596)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10: Ø650 (629-713)
444
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
505
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
480
cd/m²
469
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
497
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 505 cd/m² Médio: 461.9 cd/m² Minimum: 0.3 cd/m²
iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 476 cd/m²
Contraste: 890:1 (Preto: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.75 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 4.49 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 87% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
AU Optronics AUO41EB, , 3840x2160, 15.6
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
LG Philips LGD05C0, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), , 1920x1080, 15.6
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
AU Optronics B156HAN07.0 (AUO70ED), , 1920x1080, 15.6
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
LGD05C0, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
65%
79%
62%
62%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
51 (24, 27)
16.8 (9.2, 7.6)
67%
7.2 (3.8, 3.4)
86%
17.6 (9.2, 8.4)
65%
16.4 (8.8, 7.6)
68%
Response Time Black / White *
31 (18, 13)
11.6 (7.2, 4.4)
63%
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
72%
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
59%
13.6 (8.4, 5.2)
56%
PWM Frequency
Screen
4%
5%
2%
12%
Brightness middle
445
314.7
-29%
286
-36%
263
-41%
250
-44%
Brightness
462
312
-32%
275
-40%
264
-43%
235
-49%
Brightness Distribution
83
90
8%
90
8%
89
7%
85
2%
Black Level *
0.5
0.38
24%
0.37
26%
0.17
66%
0.29
42%
Contrast
890
828
-7%
773
-13%
1547
74%
862
-3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.75
2.56
46%
2.19
54%
4.45
6%
1.46
69%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.79
4.89
37%
4.4
44%
8.33
-7%
2.47
68%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.49
3.4
24%
2.2
51%
4.77
-6%
1.27
72%
Gamma
2.49 88%
2.3 96%
2.41 91%
2.52 87%
2.4 92%
CCT
7374 88%
6435 101%
6405 101%
7767 84%
6749 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
87
60.7
-30%
59
-32%
60
-31%
60
-31%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
94.6
-5%
91
-9%
93
-7%
93
-7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.71
2.27
1.93
Total Average (Program / Settings)
35% / 14%
42% / 18%
32% / 12%
37% / 20%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
51 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24 ms rise
↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (40.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9524 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

 
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280129013001310132013301340135013601370138013901400141014201430144014501460147014801490150015101520153015401550Tooltip
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 Intel Core i9-9880H, Intel Core i9-9880H: Ø1439 (1417.84-1545.36)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø922 (913.2-999)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1095 (1087.31-1156.25)
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing Intel Core i7-9700K, Intel Core i7-9700K: Ø1449 (1441.6-1465.07)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1040 (1017.76-1182)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
203 Points ∼100% +4%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H
196 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H
  (183 - 197, n=5)
191 Points ∼94% -3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
177 Points ∼87% -10%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼86% -11%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points ∼82% -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (36 - 196, n=354)
127 Points ∼63% -35%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-9880H
  (1401 - 1721, n=5)
1573 Points ∼100% +2%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H
1545 Points ∼98%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
1465 Points ∼93% -5%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
1182 Points ∼75% -23%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
1156 Points ∼73% -25%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
999 Points ∼64% -35%
Average of class Multimedia
  (73 - 1550, n=370)
479 Points ∼30% -69%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
196 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1545 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
130 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
9904 Points ∼100% +38%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
7161 Points ∼72%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
7161 Points ∼72% 0%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
6936 Points ∼70% -3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6708 Points ∼68% -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
6618 Points ∼67% -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1511 - 7161, n=85)
3683 Points ∼37% -49%
Productivity
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
8572 Points ∼100% +43%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
7661 Points ∼89% +28%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7547 Points ∼88% +26%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
7315 Points ∼85% +22%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3113 - 8020, n=86)
6121 Points ∼71% +2%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
5986 Points ∼70%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
5986 Points ∼70% 0%
Essentials
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
10356 Points ∼100% +16%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
9231 Points ∼89% +3%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
8961 Points ∼87%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
8961 Points ∼87% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
8600 Points ∼83% -4%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8517 Points ∼82% -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3733 - 9360, n=86)
7387 Points ∼71% -18%
Score
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6868 Points ∼100% +32%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
5654 Points ∼82% +9%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5416 Points ∼79% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5353 Points ∼78% +3%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
5211 Points ∼76%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
5211 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2046 - 5358, n=86)
3904 Points ∼57% -25%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6258 Points ∼100% +40%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5645 Points ∼90% +26%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5607 Points ∼90% +25%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
4482 Points ∼72%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
4482 Points ∼72% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2213 - 5651, n=270)
4278 Points ∼68% -5%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5485 Points ∼100% +56%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
4338 Points ∼79% +24%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4150 Points ∼76% +18%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
3505 Points ∼64%
Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
3505 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1740 - 4693, n=290)
3376 Points ∼62% -4%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3505 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4482 pontos
Ajuda
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
Average 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-32%
-24%
-17%
-31%
-7%
Write 4K
105.6
93.88
-11%
97.04
-8%
129.9
23%
97.13
-8%
96 (86.3 - 106, n=2)
-9%
Read 4K
46.32
40.56
-12%
49.58
7%
47.15
2%
53.66
16%
42.9 (39.5 - 46.3, n=2)
-7%
Write Seq
2910
1468
-50%
1838
-37%
1840
-37%
1526
-48%
2886 (2862 - 2910, n=2)
-1%
Read Seq
2820
1540
-45%
2421
-14%
1775
-37%
2020
-28%
2858 (2820 - 2896, n=2)
1%
Write 4K Q32T1
545
293.5
-46%
326.9
-40%
294.5
-46%
285.6
-48%
425 (305 - 545, n=2)
-22%
Read 4K Q32T1
632.2
346
-45%
372.9
-41%
373.6
-41%
321.8
-49%
491 (350 - 632, n=2)
-22%
Write Seq Q32T1
3349
1941
-42%
1894
-43%
3295
-2%
1533
-54%
3395 (3349 - 3440, n=2)
1%
Read Seq Q32T1
3333
3266
-2%
2828
-15%
3535
6%
2351
-29%
3435 (3333 - 3537, n=2)
3%
AS SSD
-4%
-24%
19%
-34%
-3%
Copy Game MB/s
1200.14
1042.83
936.25
Copy Program MB/s
525.53
452.13
362.56
Copy ISO MB/s
1974.98
2030.84
1863.91
Score Total
4411
4079
-8%
2896
-34%
5529
25%
2722
-38%
4267 (4123 - 4411, n=2)
-3%
Score Write
1762
2010
14%
1528
-13%
2590
47%
957
-46%
1660 (1558 - 1762, n=2)
-6%
Score Read
1759
1362
-23%
923
-48%
1953
11%
1180
-33%
1734 (1708 - 1759, n=2)
-1%
Access Time Write *
0.037
0.033
11%
0.04
-8%
0.028
24%
0.034
8%
0.038 (0.037 - 0.039, n=2)
-3%
Access Time Read *
0.049
0.047
4%
0.08
-63%
0.031
37%
0.114
-133%
0.052 (0.049 - 0.055, n=2)
-6%
4K-64 Write
1401.42
1717.43
23%
1253
-11%
2190.3
56%
702.74
-50%
1299 (1197 - 1401, n=2)
-7%
4K-64 Read
1428.27
1125.76
-21%
623.93
-56%
1650.96
16%
913.55
-36%
1397 (1366 - 1428, n=2)
-2%
4K Write
100.19
110.72
11%
103.6
3%
134.74
34%
107.12
7%
97.3 (94.4 - 100, n=2)
-3%
4K Read
45.15
52.31
16%
48.32
7%
27.86
-38%
55.04
22%
43 (40.9 - 45.2, n=2)
-5%
Seq Write
2603.96
1822.26
-30%
1711.53
-34%
2650.29
2%
1471.06
-44%
2636 (2604 - 2668, n=2)
1%
Seq Read
2859.65
1839.67
-36%
2505.83
-12%
2738.85
-4%
2112.83
-26%
2932 (2860 - 3005, n=2)
3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-18% / -15%
-24% / -24%
1% / 4%
-33% / -32%
-5% / -5%

* ... smaller is better

2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
Sequential Read: 2646 MB/s
Sequential Write: 2859 MB/s
512K Read: 1792 MB/s
512K Write: 2635 MB/s
4K Read: 63.04 MB/s
4K Write: 112.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 625.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 564.3 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9700K
26975 Points ∼100% +29%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
24267 Points ∼90% +16%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
22723 Points ∼84% +9%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
22089 Points ∼82% +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (14723 - 23819, n=13)
21392 Points ∼79% +3%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9880H
20837 Points ∼77%
Average of class Multimedia
  (352 - 20837, n=624)
2918 Points ∼11% -86%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9700K
20759 Points ∼100% +29%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
19123 Points ∼92% +19%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
18153 Points ∼87% +13%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
17598 Points ∼85% +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (11563 - 18443, n=14)
16710 Points ∼80% +4%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9880H
16100 Points ∼78%
Average of class Multimedia
  (337 - 16100, n=399)
2818 Points ∼14% -82%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9700K
134326 Points ∼100% +104%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
109473 Points ∼81% +66%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
106170 Points ∼79% +61%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (39014 - 112480, n=12)
87521 Points ∼65% +33%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
73366 Points ∼55% +11%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9880H
65859 Points ∼49%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2468 - 77755, n=401)
16517 Points ∼12% -75%
3DMark 11 Performance
19440 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
36379 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
14946 pontos
Ajuda
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
80.84 fps ∼100%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
73 (min: 60) fps ∼90% -10%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
70.2 (min: 58) fps ∼87% -13%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
68.9 fps ∼85% -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (57 - 80.8, n=11)
64.3 fps ∼80% -20%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
58.3 (min: 48) fps ∼72% -28%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2.9 - 80.8, n=89)
19.4 fps ∼24% -76%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
130.1 fps ∼100% +12%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
130 (min: 108) fps ∼100% +12%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
128.4 fps ∼99% +10%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
116.53 fps ∼90%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (86.5 - 130, n=10)
114 fps ∼88% -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
86.5 fps ∼66% -26%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3.8 - 117, n=99)
29 fps ∼22% -75%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
223.1 fps ∼100% +8%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
208.9 fps ∼94% +1%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
205.84 fps ∼92%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (145 - 209, n=9)
190 fps ∼85% -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
144.9 fps ∼65% -30%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.2 - 206, n=100)
43.6 fps ∼20% -79%
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
331.2 fps ∼100% +12%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
295.68 fps ∼89%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (178 - 306, n=9)
256 fps ∼77% -13%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
252.5 fps ∼76% -15%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
177.7 fps ∼54% -40%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8.9 - 296, n=103)
63.2 fps ∼19% -79%
Thief
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
99 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
99 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3.2 - 99, n=86)
18.6 fps ∼19% -81%
1366x768 High Preset AA:FXAA & Low SS AF:4x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
129 fps ∼100% 0%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
128.7 fps ∼100%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4.8 - 129, n=102)
29.1 fps ∼23% -77%
1366x768 Normal Preset AA:FX
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
132 fps ∼100% 0%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
131.6 fps ∼100%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.3 - 132, n=93)
29.4 fps ∼22% -78%
1024x768 Very Low Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
135 fps ∼100% 0%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
134.8 fps ∼100%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9.2 - 135, n=90)
36.2 fps ∼27% -73%
BioShock Infinite
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
187.8 fps ∼100% +26%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
152.5 fps ∼81% +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (116 - 211, n=11)
149 fps ∼79% 0%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
148.78 fps ∼79%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
127.7 fps ∼68% -14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3.62 - 149, n=213)
28.1 fps ∼15% -81%
1366x768 High Preset
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
320.9 fps ∼100% +16%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
277.17 fps ∼86%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
246.1 fps ∼77% -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (203 - 277, n=11)
243 fps ∼76% -12%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
202.6 fps ∼63% -27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (36.3 - 277, n=249)
62.6 fps ∼20% -77%
1366x768 Medium Preset
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
346 fps ∼100% +19%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
291.81 fps ∼84%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
260.1 fps ∼75% -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (218 - 292, n=11)
260 fps ∼75% -11%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
217.9 fps ∼63% -25%
Average of class Multimedia
  (43.7 - 292, n=239)
69.9 fps ∼20% -76%
1280x720 Very Low Preset
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
400.7 fps ∼100% +8%
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
369.72 fps ∼92%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (234 - 370, n=11)
298 fps ∼74% -19%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
290.8 fps ∼73% -21%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
233.9 fps ∼58% -37%
Average of class Multimedia
  (19.5 - 370, n=232)
107 fps ∼27% -71%
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
117.4 (min: 102.7) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (106 - 117, n=2)
112 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (13.9 - 117, n=30)
54.3 fps ∼46% -54%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
122.9 (min: 108.7) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (111 - 123, n=2)
117 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (16 - 123, n=31)
53 fps ∼43% -57%
1366x768 med (1/3)
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
131.4 (min: 115.6) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (117 - 131, n=2)
124 fps ∼94% -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (17.3 - 134, n=31)
74.3 fps ∼57% -43%
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
142.2 (min: 126.5) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (127 - 142, n=2)
134 fps ∼94% -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (28.2 - 150, n=35)
85.1 fps ∼60% -40%
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0): Ø76.3 (71-83)
baixo média alto ultra4K
BioShock Infinite (2013) 369.72291.81277.17148.78fps
Thief (2014) 134.8131.6128.799fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 295.68205.84116.5380.8442.3fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 142.2131.4122.9117.4fps

Barulho

Ocioso
32.8 / 32.8 / 33.6 dB
Carga
40.9 / 42.7 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30.2 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.533.432.629.130.52531.830.328.729.731.83129.931.332.829.729.94028.428.830.225.928.45027.327.929.725.627.3632728.529.424.1278027.226.727.622.927.210026.226.525.323.526.212526.126.325.623.426.116026.626.325.723.226.620025.52623.922.325.525024.526.323.52224.531526.43021.92126.440025.928.521.720.825.95002527.921.519.92563024.629.320.920.424.680024.527.220.12024.5100027.330.520.819.427.3125027.53020.618.727.5160028.530.320.31828.5200029.631.820.517.829.6250030.832.520.517.430.8315032.433.820.91732.4400030.532.120.616.830.5500029.630.920.916.729.6630026.928.820.516.426.9800024.726.520.316.224.71000024.125.320.216.224.11250021.422.22016.121.41600019.720.319.91619.7SPL40.942.732.830.240.9N3.33.91.71.23.3median 26.2median 28.5median 20.8median 18.7median 26.2Delta1.521.52.21.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
Carga Máxima
 45.7 °C49.5 °C46.8 °C 
 40.3 °C49.7 °C47.8 °C 
 31.3 °C31.3 °C34.9 °C 
Máximo: 49.7 °C
Médio: 41.9 °C
54.3 °C60.4 °C43 °C
44.4 °C47.1 °C40.6 °C
36.3 °C37.1 °C34.4 °C
Máximo: 60.4 °C
Médio: 44.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  46 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.7 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 30.9 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.7 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 60.4 °C / 141 F, compared to the average of 38.8 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.9 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.9 °C / 94.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29.1 °C / 84.4 F (-5.8 °C / -10.4 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203129.1312530.629.730.63130.729.730.74028.925.928.95027.725.627.76326.424.126.48027.622.927.610032.223.532.212534.923.434.916035.523.235.520034.622.334.625043.32243.331551.82151.840056.820.856.850057.319.957.363062.320.462.380071.52071.5100073.519.473.5125072.518.772.5160073.41873.4200077.417.877.4250069.417.469.4315072.91772.9400070.116.870.1500067.716.767.763006516.465800064.716.264.71000055.916.255.9125005216.1521600048.81648.8SPL83.530.283.5N49.71.249.7median 62.3median 18.7median 62.3Delta12.12.212.135.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI P65 Creator 9SF-657Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.42 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 91% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.9 / 1.6 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 9.4 / 17.4 / 19.6 Watt
Carga midlight 103 / 216 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
10%
-61%
-118%
-10%
-14%
18%
Idle Minimum *
9.4
10.4
-11%
24
-155%
35
-272%
16
-70%
15.1 (9.4 - 23.5, n=11)
-61%
11.6 (2.1 - 101, n=922)
-23%
Idle Average *
17.4
14.6
16%
27
-55%
39
-124%
18
-3%
19.1 (12.3 - 28, n=11)
-10%
16.2 (4.2 - 122, n=922)
7%
Idle Maximum *
19.6
16.3
17%
33
-68%
47
-140%
23
-17%
23.6 (16.3 - 32, n=11)
-20%
19.7 (4.7 - 181, n=922)
-1%
Load Average *
103
88.5
14%
129
-25%
117
-14%
88
15%
94.6 (83.4 - 107, n=11)
8%
59.9 (18.5 - 164, n=901)
42%
Load Maximum *
216
182.4
16%
216
-0%
299
-38%
167
23%
188 (120 - 229, n=11)
13%
78 (20.1 - 329, n=906)
64%
Witcher 3 ultra *
155.4
176
196
120

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
9h 37min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5h 57min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 05min
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 82 Wh
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 80 Wh
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 76 Wh
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 82 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
20%
-27%
-31%
57%
0%
Reader / Idle
577
682
18%
353
-39%
194
-66%
549
-5%
403 (73 - 2085, n=882)
-30%
WiFi v1.3
357
387
8%
220
-38%
157
-56%
382
7%
355 (96 - 942, n=238)
-1%
Load
65
88
35%
62
-5%
83
28%
174
168%
85.2 (32 - 238, n=882)
31%
H.264
154
364
350 (114 - 915, n=103)

Pro

+ Boa cobertura de espaço de cores
+ Marcos estreitos
+ Baixo peso
+ Construção compacta
+ Alto desempenho
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ SSD RAID

Contra

- RTX 2070 Max-Q com TDP baixa
- Poucas opções de manutenção
- Sem leitor de cartões

Veredicto - portátil multimídia compacto com muita potência

Review: MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657. Test unit provided by MSI Germany.
Review: MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657. Test unit provided by MSI Germany.

Nossa análise mostrou que o MSI P65 Creator 9SF é uma usina compacta com uma tela viva. Sua carcaça se adapta perfeitamente a ambientes de negócios e o acabamento é bom. A porta Thunderbolt 3 garante que os usuários continuem bem equipados para qualquer necessidade futura de portas.

O MSI P65 Creator 9SF é impressionante com seu design atraente e ótimo desempenho. O fabricante poderia ter escolhido a versão da Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q com um TDP mais alto, no entanto.

O desempenho do sistema é bom e pode acompanhar facilmente a maioria dos concorrentes. Outros fabricantes, no entanto, conseguem tirar um pouco mais da GPU - embora, é claro, o P65 Creator esteja equipado com a versão TDP mais baixa do RTX 2070 Max-Q. Como no modelo anterior, as opções de manutenção são basicamente inexistentes. Nossa unidade de teste também continua a apresentar um leitor de digitais integrado no touchpad. Este último é significativamente mais amplo do que antes e, portanto, oferece mais espaço para navegação por gestos.

MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 - 06/03/2019 v6
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
84 / 98 → 86%
Teclado
81%
Mouse
84%
Conectividade
0 / 81 → 
Peso
64 / 20-67 → 94%
Bateria
88%
Pantalha
89%
Desempenho do jogos
99 / 85 → 100%
Desempenho da aplicação
90 / 92 → 98%
Temperatura
84%
Ruído
81 / 95 → 85%
Audio
74%
Médio
83%
89%
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil MSI P65 Creator 9SF (i9-9880H, RTX2070 Max-Q)
Mike Wobker, 2019-06- 5 (Update: 2019-06- 6)