snhb.queue.push(function(){ snhb.addAdditionalAdSlotsToRefresh(additionalAdSlots); }); googletag.enableServices(); }); nbc_pagecall();
Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Aspire Nitro 5: Um portátil de jogos com duração da bateria decente

Sebastian Bade, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 08/26/2019

Um portátil de jogos prático! A Acer provou várias vezes com a sua série Nitro 5 que os portáteis para jogos nem sempre têm que ser extremamente caros. A empresa está de volta com um novo modelo de 17,3 polegadas equipado com um processador Intel Core i7-9750H e uma NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti, que devem ser combinar para criar uma base sólida para este portátil de jogos. Leia mais para descobrir como o mais recente Nitro 5 se comporta em nossos testes, em nossa análise.

Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887 (Aspire Nitro 5 AN517 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-9750H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Análises do: 1455 - 1590 MHz, Memoría: 1500 MHz, Nvidia 430.86, Nvidia Optimus
Memória
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2666 dual-channel. 2 slots SODIMM, um máximo de 32 GB
Pantalha
17.3 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, LP173WF5-SPB3, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, 512 GB 
, SSD M.2 PCIe de 512 GB + HD de 1 TB (Toshiba MQ04ABF100), 1400 GB livre
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Cannon Point-LP PCH - cAVS (Audio, Video, Speech)
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector combinado para fones e microfone de 3,5 mm
Funcionamento em rede
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 26.9 x 403 x 280
Bateria
57 Wh, 3580 mAh Lítio-Ion, Bateria de 4 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD (720p)
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet de 6 filas, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação, Nitro Sense, Wave MaxxAudio, Acer Collection S, Norton Security Ultra, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.766 kg, Suprimento de energia: 711 g
Preço
1499 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517

Size Comparison

419 mm 287 mm 33 mm 2.7 kg405 mm 282 mm 25 mm 2.8 kg403 mm 280 mm 26.9 mm 2.8 kg400 mm 279 mm 27 mm 2.8 kg399 mm 290 mm 26.3 mm 2.8 kg399 mm 293 mm 26 mm 2.9 kg
Left-hand side: Kensington lock slot, RJ45 Ethernet, HDMI, USB Type-C, 2x USB 3.0 Type-A
Left-hand side: Kensington lock slot, RJ45 Ethernet, HDMI, USB Type-C, 2x USB 3.0 Type-A
Right-hand side: 3.5 mm jack, 1x USB Type-A, power connector, ventilation slots
Right-hand side: 3.5 mm jack, 1x USB Type-A, power connector, ventilation slots
Front: no connections
Front: no connections
Rear: ventilation slots
Rear: ventilation slots
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
681 MBit/s ∼100% +3%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
680 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
664 (min: 612, max: 682) MBit/s ∼98%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
655 MBit/s ∼96% -1%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
650 MBit/s ∼95% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 1380, n=281)
609 MBit/s ∼89% -8%
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
589 MBit/s ∼86% -11%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
692 MBit/s ∼100% +7%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
684 MBit/s ∼99% +6%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
650 MBit/s ∼94% 0%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
647 (min: 503, max: 692) MBit/s ∼93%
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
633 MBit/s ∼91% -2%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
623 MBit/s ∼90% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1160, n=281)
561 MBit/s ∼81% -13%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø664 (612-682)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø647 (503-692)
345
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
341
cd/m²
362
cd/m²
407
cd/m²
346
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
387
cd/m²
370
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
LP173WF5-SPB3
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 407 cd/m² Médio: 364.4 cd/m² Minimum: 27 cd/m²
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 407 cd/m²
Contraste: 1357:1 (Preto: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.55 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 7.61 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
92% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.51
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
LP173WF5-SPB3, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
AU Optronics B173HAN04.4 (AUO449D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
BOE0825, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
CMN1747, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3
Asus TUF FX705GM
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Response Times
51%
20%
70%
67%
71%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
37 (19, 18)
18 (8.4, 9.6)
51%
31.6 (14, 17.6)
15%
6.4 (3.4, 3)
83%
12.8 (6.8, 6)
65%
7.4 (3.8, 3.6)
80%
Response Time Black / White *
26 (16, 10)
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
51%
19.6 (10.8, 8.8)
25%
11.2 (6, 5.2)
57%
8.2 (6, 2.2)
68%
10 (4.8, 5.2)
62%
PWM Frequency
25770 (15)
Screen
12%
1%
4%
-12%
14%
Brightness middle
407
286
-30%
299.6
-26%
294.3
-28%
326.4
-20%
234
-43%
Brightness
364
282
-23%
285
-22%
289
-21%
317
-13%
228
-37%
Brightness Distribution
84
87
4%
86
2%
89
6%
90
7%
85
1%
Black Level *
0.3
0.19
37%
0.33
-10%
0.3
-0%
0.28
7%
0.2
33%
Contrast
1357
1505
11%
908
-33%
981
-28%
1166
-14%
1170
-14%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.55
3.57
22%
3.68
19%
3.95
13%
7.83
-72%
2.16
53%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
12.44
7.5
40%
8.05
35%
6.49
48%
13.36
-7%
3.39
73%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.61
4.51
41%
3.8
50%
3.7
51%
10.9
-43%
2
74%
Gamma
2.51 88%
2.36 93%
2.12 104%
2.07 106%
1.97 112%
2.46 89%
CCT
7212 90%
7411 88%
7240 90%
7155 91%
11056 59%
6394 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
64
8%
58.1
-2%
57.7
-2%
75.8
28%
58
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
92
98
7%
89.8
-2%
89
-3%
100
9%
89
-3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.31
3.15
3.08
2.83
2.02
Total Average (Program / Settings)
32% / 18%
11% / 4%
37% / 15%
28% / 1%
43% / 23%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Colour Saturation
CalMAN: Colour Saturation

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (39.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9279 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280Tooltip
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø946 (926.12-1010.42)
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel Core i5-9300H: Ø844 (814.1-850.74)
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1077 (1065.56-1205.55)
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1162 (1108.49-1274.58)
MSI GL73 8SE-010US Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø920 (906.29-1034.2)
Asus TUF FX705GM Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1022 (992.14-1137)
Performance Rating
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
62.4 pt ∼62%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
61.2 pt ∼61%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
58.1 pt ∼58%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
56.9 pt ∼57%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
53.2 pt ∼53%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
49.6 pt ∼50%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
193 Points ∼89% +5%
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
189 Points ∼87% +3%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
183 Points ∼84%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
175 Points ∼80% -4%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
171 Points ∼78% -7%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
169 Points ∼78% -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
1276 Points ∼29% +26%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
1172 Points ∼27% +16%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
1137 Points ∼26% +13%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
1010 Points ∼23%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
997 Points ∼23% -1%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
850 Points ∼19% -16%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
2.09 Points ∼86%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
2 Points ∼82% -4%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
12.79 Points ∼29% +13%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
11.33 Points ∼26%
Blender 2.79 - ---
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
486.6 Seconds * ∼5%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
20173 Points ∼35%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
17288 Points ∼30% -14%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5075 Points ∼80%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5072 Points ∼80% 0%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
13898 Points ∼71% +37%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
13273 Points ∼68% +31%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
13112 Points ∼67% +29%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
10557 Points ∼54% +4%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
10159 Points ∼52%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
9463 Points ∼49% -7%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
443 Points ∼86%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
427 Points ∼83% -4%
CPU (Multi Core)
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
2200 Points ∼32%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
1877 Points ∼27% -15%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
30374 MIPS ∼29%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4842 MIPS ∼70%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10
Cinebench R10
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R20
Cinebench R20
Octane V2
Octane V2
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
 
 
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
4020
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
9069 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
37188 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
4239 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
7041
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
29665
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit
10.27 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit
79.28 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.09 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
11.33 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
78.35 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit
1.85 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
183 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
124.25 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1010 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
7638 Points ∼100% +19%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
6829 Points ∼89% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (5898 - 7638, n=13)
6735 Points ∼88% +5%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
6502 Points ∼85% +1%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
6433 Points ∼84%
Average of class Gaming
  (1764 - 11191, n=222)
6373 Points ∼83% -1%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
6108 Points ∼80% -5%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
6071 Points ∼79% -6%
Productivity
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
7891 Points ∼100% +4%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
7608 Points ∼96%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (7241 - 8136, n=13)
7531 Points ∼95% -1%
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
7349 Points ∼93% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (4175 - 8968, n=223)
7175 Points ∼91% -6%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
7165 Points ∼91% -6%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
7096 Points ∼90% -7%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
7025 Points ∼89% -8%
Essentials
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
9486 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (8621 - 10098, n=13)
9393 Points ∼99% +1%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
9321 Points ∼98%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
9320 Points ∼98% 0%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
8907 Points ∼94% -4%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
8791 Points ∼93% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (4892 - 10668, n=224)
8535 Points ∼90% -8%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
8397 Points ∼89% -10%
Score
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5811 Points ∼100% +5%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5613 Points ∼97% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (5273 - 5829, n=13)
5594 Points ∼96% +1%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5519 Points ∼95%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5429 Points ∼93% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7171, n=226)
5228 Points ∼90% -5%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
5169 Points ∼89% -6%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
5118 Points ∼88% -7%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5744 Points ∼100% +7%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
5719 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (5041 - 5913, n=11)
5529 Points ∼96% +3%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5361 Points ∼93%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
5359 Points ∼93% 0%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5222 Points ∼91% -3%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5138 Points ∼89% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=402)
5042 Points ∼88% -6%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5217 Points ∼100% +9%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4818 Points ∼92% +1%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4782 Points ∼92%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4660 Points ∼89% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (4074 - 5217, n=10)
4529 Points ∼87% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=419)
4261 Points ∼82% -11%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
4148 Points ∼80% -13%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
3876 Points ∼74% -19%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4782 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
7475 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5361 pontos
Ajuda
AS SSD
AS SSD
HD Tune
HD Tune
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
Asus TUF FX705GM
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
Average WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
 
AS SSD
1%
-2%
-50%
-83%
-17%
48%
Score Total
3252
3355
3%
2909
-11%
1731
-47%
1061
-67%
2458
-24%
3191 (2279 - 4334, n=20)
-2%
Score Write
1368
1520
11%
1476
8%
971
-29%
385
-72%
1082
-21%
1404 (976 - 1879, n=20)
3%
Score Read
1248
1216
-3%
951
-24%
503
-60%
456
-63%
913
-27%
1182 (721 - 1638, n=20)
-5%
Access Time Write *
0.034
0.034
-0%
0.034
-0%
0.138
-306%
0.09
-165%
0.036
-6%
0.0336 (0.021 - 0.091, n=20)
1%
Access Time Read *
0.083
0.073
12%
0.073
12%
0.055
34%
0.237
-186%
0.106
-28%
0.0791 (0.046 - 0.129, n=18)
5%
4K-64 Write
1121.1
1275.76
14%
1232.96
10%
773.95
-31%
285.72
-75%
856.34
-24%
1150 (720 - 1459, n=20)
3%
4K-64 Read
1045.01
1027.92
-2%
730.81
-30%
321.9
-69%
354.32
-66%
720.13
-31%
1002 (647 - 1296, n=20)
-4%
4K Write
108.74
111.93
3%
108.22
0%
104.35
-4%
56.58
-48%
101.9
-6%
716 (82.1 - 11894, n=20)
558%
4K Read
44.79
38.9
-13%
49.73
11%
49.43
10%
21.91
-51%
38.49
-14%
41.2 (25.3 - 48.3, n=20)
-8%
Seq Write
1381
1323.5
-4%
1344.71
-3%
929.67
-33%
427.59
-69%
1236.46
-10%
1257 (412 - 2407, n=20)
-9%
Seq Read
1578
1495.07
-5%
1708.98
8%
1318.55
-16%
793.63
-50%
1571.32
0%
1388 (399 - 2934, n=20)
-12%

* ... smaller is better

WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Velocidade de Transferência Mínima: 0.3 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Máxima: 137.5 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Média: 106.3 MB/s
Tempo de Acesso: 18.9 ms
Índice de Explosão: 246.8 MB/s
Uso da CPU: 2.1 %
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
20407 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
20224 Points ∼99% -1%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
20157 Points ∼99% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (18610 - 20940, n=17)
19928 Points ∼98% -2%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
19733 Points ∼97% -3%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
17457 Points ∼86% -14%
Asus TUF FX705GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
13722 Points ∼67% -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=630)
13571 Points ∼67% -33%
3DMark
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
6752 Points ∼100% +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (6576 - 6752, n=4)
6676 Points ∼99% +2%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
6576 Points ∼97%
Average of class Gaming
  (534 - 19870, n=166)
5164 Points ∼76% -21%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
15731 Points ∼100% +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (14186 - 15482, n=17)
14727 Points ∼94% +2%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
14509 Points ∼92%
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
14444 Points ∼92% 0%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
14186 Points ∼90% -2%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
13188 Points ∼84% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=555)
11462 Points ∼73% -21%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
97845 Points ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (70315 - 103428, n=13)
94921 Points ∼97% -3%
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
94696 Points ∼97% -3%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
89505 Points ∼91% -9%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i5-9300H
85805 Points ∼88% -12%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
77569 Points ∼79% -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (5761 - 184578, n=536)
67957 Points ∼69% -31%
3DMark 11 Performance
16279 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
103231 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
31347 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
12738 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
6346 pontos
Ajuda
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (51.6 - 60.6, n=14)
55.8 fps ∼100% +1%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
55.3 (min: 45, max: 67) fps ∼99%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
55.1 fps ∼99% 0%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
55.1 fps ∼99% 0%
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
53.7 fps ∼96% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=327)
50.2 fps ∼90% -9%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
48.5 fps ∼87% -12%
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
36.5 fps ∼65% -34%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
109.6 fps ∼100% +9%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
104.3 fps ∼95% +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (93 - 120, n=11)
103 fps ∼94% +2%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
101 (min: 76, max: 116) fps ∼92%
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
99.5 fps ∼91% -1%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
92.1 fps ∼84% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.1 - 194, n=280)
87.9 fps ∼80% -13%
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
66.2 fps ∼60% -34%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (64 - 85, n=5)
74.6 fps ∼100% +2%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
73 fps ∼98%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
71 fps ∼95% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (17.2 - 92.5, n=33)
64 fps ∼86% -12%
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
87 (min: 77, max: 101) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (83 - 87, n=3)
84.3 fps ∼97% -3%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
83 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (10 - 113, n=43)
70.3 fps ∼81% -19%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
90 (min: 69, max: 108) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (84 - 90, n=3)
87.3 fps ∼97% -3%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
84 fps ∼93% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (10 - 120, n=43)
74.6 fps ∼83% -17%
Far Cry New Dawn
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (73 - 81, n=6)
76.5 fps ∼100% +3%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
75 fps ∼98% +1%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
74 (min: 55, max: 100) fps ∼97%
Average of class Gaming
  (14 - 108, n=34)
68.7 fps ∼90% -7%
1920x1080 High Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (79 - 89, n=6)
84.3 fps ∼100% +2%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
83 fps ∼98% 0%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
83 (min: 65, max: 106) fps ∼98%
Average of class Gaming
  (15 - 121, n=32)
76.9 fps ∼91% -7%
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (94.6 - 125, n=5)
112 fps ∼100% +1%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
110.6 (min: 97.1) fps ∼99%
Average of class Gaming
  (14 - 125, n=30)
91.7 fps ∼82% -17%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (103 - 130, n=5)
118 fps ∼100% 0%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
117.6 (min: 101.9) fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (15.3 - 133, n=27)
94.5 fps ∼80% -20%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
140.8 fps ∼100% +2%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
138 fps ∼98% 0%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
138 (min: 26, max: 384) fps ∼98%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (122 - 144, n=12)
136 fps ∼97% -1%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
130 fps ∼92% -6%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
127.9 fps ∼91% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.7 - 266, n=351)
98.3 fps ∼70% -29%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
81 (min: 72, max: 91) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
  (74 - 81, n=2)
77.5 fps ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.9 - 159, n=169)
68.6 fps ∼85% -15%
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G; The Witcher 3: Ø52.7 (48-62)
baixo média alto ultraQHD4K
BioShock Infinite (2013) 309 270 247 138 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 254 171 101 55.3 32.9 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 143 123.7 117.6 110.6 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 156 164 100 81 38 fps
Rocket League (2017) 248 247 221 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 92 85 73 fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 107 92 90 87 60 31 fps
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 105 87 83 74 60 32 fps

Barulho

Ocioso
30.2 / 30.2 / 31 dB
HDD
31.6 dB
Carga
43.4 / 45.5 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887, Intel Core i7-9750H
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH, Intel Core i5-9300H
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl, Intel Core i7-9750H
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74, Intel Core i7-9750H
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
MSI GL73 8SE-010US, Intel Core i7-8750H
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
Asus TUF FX705GM, Intel Core i7-8750H
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
Noise
-5%
9%
-8%
-4%
-10%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
28.2
6%
28.2
6%
28.6
5%
29
3%
Idle Minimum *
30.2
30
1%
30.1
-0%
31.8
-5%
33.8
-12%
32
-6%
Idle Average *
30.2
32
-6%
30.1
-0%
32
-6%
34
-13%
33
-9%
Idle Maximum *
31
34
-10%
30.1
3%
40.6
-31%
34.1
-10%
44
-42%
Load Average *
43.4
44
-1%
34.2
21%
48
-11%
36.5
16%
46
-6%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48.5
50
-3%
34.2
29%
48
1%
47.8
1%
48
1%
Load Maximum *
45.5
52
-14%
43.8
4%
51.5
-13%
52.2
-15%
50
-10%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.233.235.432.636.233.935.2253633.834.93634.731.3363140.639.436.44344.732.840.64032.735.931.63236.229.932.7503036.829.529.530.928.4306331.133.128.630.430.72931.18028.728.82925.827.525.628.710028.726.728.825.52625.428.712527.428.525.826.126.424.427.416025.627.623.624.22423.825.620027.327.923.122.822.922.727.325028.529.423.422.322.421.828.531530.733.422.622.821.120.430.740029.73122.822.920.119.429.75002829.220.119.819.219.12863029.130.920.219.519.118.529.180031.232.620.219.518.518.231.2100032.635.121.119.917.717.632.6125035.937.821.120.217.517.635.9160033.135.220.518.217.417.233.1200035.437.119.718.317.317.235.4250032.734.718.618.417.317.332.7315030.833.517.917.717.717.430.8400027.930.518.117.617.517.627.9500025.728.318.117.717.917.725.7630024.827.51817.617.917.824.8800021.223.51817.817.917.821.21000019.420.61817.817.917.819.41250018.41918.217.918.117.718.41600018.118.217.917.717.817.818.1SPL43.445.531.73130.33043.4N4.24.91.61.51.41.44.2median 28.5median 29.4median 20.2median 19.5median 17.9median 17.8median 28.5Delta2.83.62.52.32.41.42.8hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAcer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
System information during a Prime95 stress test
System information during a Prime95 stress test
System information during a FurMark and Prime95 stress test
System information during a FurMark and Prime95 stress test
 49.2 °C51.7 °C47 °C 
 43.1 °C49.5 °C38 °C 
 28.6 °C24.4 °C25.5 °C 
Máximo: 51.7 °C
Médio: 39.7 °C
47.1 °C55.4 °C39.2 °C
38.5 °C38 °C36 °C
23.3 °C23 °C25.6 °C
Máximo: 55.4 °C
Médio: 36.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  53.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.2 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51.7 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.4 °C / 132 F, compared to the average of 42.3 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.4 °C / 88.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2.6 °C / -4.7 F).
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887, Intel Core i7-9750H
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH, Intel Core i5-9300H
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl, Intel Core i7-9750H
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74, Intel Core i7-9750H
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
MSI GL73 8SE-010US, Intel Core i7-8750H
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
Asus TUF FX705GM, Intel Core i7-8750H
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
Heat
-12%
-6%
1%
12%
-2%
Maximum Upper Side *
51.7
48
7%
42.6
18%
44.6
14%
47
9%
54
-4%
Maximum Bottom *
55.4
56
-1%
49
12%
51.6
7%
44.4
20%
53
4%
Idle Upper Side *
29.1
36
-24%
34
-17%
31.6
-9%
24.6
15%
30
-3%
Idle Bottom *
29
38
-31%
39.4
-36%
31.4
-8%
28
3%
30
-3%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.133.936.12540.931.340.9314232.8424036.329.936.35032.328.432.36330.72930.7803125.63110033.825.433.812541.124.441.116044.823.844.820038.822.738.825046.421.846.431552.820.452.840058.819.458.850060.719.160.763067.618.567.680067.218.267.2100068.617.668.6125065.817.665.8160065.717.265.7200062.117.262.1250061.817.361.8315063.917.463.9400060.117.660.1500059.617.759.6630063.217.863.2800064.717.864.71000060.217.860.21250056.117.756.11600050.617.850.6SPL76.23076.2N38.21.438.2median 60.2median 17.8median 60.2Delta6.91.46.932.337.438.242.330.933.834.434.529.730.926.432.526.129.425.529.329.238.626.350.423.157.820.968.220.16819.270.719.272.218.473.317.875.817.672.618.274.417.973.617.572.717.773.517.773.117.66817.668.517.666.517.767.717.65717.463.117.45830.2841.462.1median 17.8median 68.22.47.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAcer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68.59 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.22 / 0.46 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3.9 / 8.9 / 12.2 Watt
Carga midlight 83 / 168 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
9300H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3
Asus TUF FX705GM
8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-116%
-7%
-115%
-48%
-79%
-109%
-150%
Idle Minimum *
3.9
19
-387%
5.4
-38%
13.6
-249%
8.8
-126%
13
-233%
14.2 (3.9 - 20, n=12)
-264%
19.4 (3.4 - 113, n=712)
-397%
Idle Average *
8.9
22
-147%
9.2
-3%
26.2
-194%
16.2
-82%
17
-91%
20.5 (8.9 - 30.7, n=12)
-130%
24.9 (6.6 - 119, n=712)
-180%
Idle Maximum *
12.2
30
-146%
13
-7%
35
-187%
18.3
-50%
24
-97%
28.1 (12.2 - 56.3, n=12)
-130%
30.1 (8.3 - 122, n=712)
-147%
Load Average *
83
79
5%
85.9
-3%
113.6
-37%
86.1
-4%
106
-28%
90.6 (79 - 114, n=12)
-9%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=703)
-25%
Load Maximum *
168
201
-20%
182.2
-8%
200.2
-19%
186.4
-11%
179
-7%
189 (168 - 216, n=12)
-13%
172 (21.9 - 590, n=702)
-2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
130
134
-3%
107.9
17%
134.1
-3%
146.7
-13%
151
-16%

* ... smaller is better

Battery life: Idle
Battery life: Idle
Battery life: Sustained load
Battery life: Sustained load
Battery life: Wi-Fi
Battery life: Wi-Fi
Battery life: H.264 loop
Battery life: H.264 loop
Charging time
Charging time
Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
13h 26min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 44.18362.1.0)
6h 9min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
6h 20min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 41min
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887
9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 57 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
9300H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 57 Wh
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 52.5 Wh
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 66 Wh
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 41 Wh
Asus TUF FX705GM
8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 64 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-45%
-21%
-21%
-58%
-29%
-35%
Reader / Idle
806
311
-61%
695
-14%
517
-36%
388
-52%
380
-53%
349 (39 - 1174, n=674)
-57%
H.264
380
202
-47%
260
-32%
257 (88 - 508, n=148)
-32%
WiFi v1.3
369
220
-40%
339
-8%
294
-20%
168
-54%
272
-26%
259 (78 - 622, n=375)
-30%
Load
101
68
-33%
59
-42%
94
-7%
33
-67%
95
-6%
79 (18 - 202, n=640)
-22%

Pro

+ Sólido
+ Design moderno
+ Painel IPS rico em contraste
+ Sem PWM
+ Sem bleeding da luz de fundo da tela
+ SSD PCIe e HD
+ Baia para unidade M.2
+ GeForce GTX 1660 Ti com 6 GB de VRAM
+ Energeticamente eficiente
+ Duração da bateria comparativamente bom
+ Bom desempenho do Wi-Fi
+ Bluetooth 5.0
+ Alto-falantes utilizáveis
+ Teclado iluminado

Contra

- Relativamente barulhento sob carga
- Ventiladores com ruídos de alta frequência
- Tempos de reação da tela lentos
- Altos desvios Delta E 2000
- Afogamento térmico durante o nosso teste de estresse
- Desempenho reduzido com a bateria
- CPU comparativamente lenta

O Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517 é um portátil de jogos de 17,3 polegadas. Teoricamente, o Core i7-9750H e a GeForce GTX 1660 Ti devem criar um sistema potente, com 16 GB de RAM DDR4 de canal duplo e 1,5 TB de armazenamento combinado à disposição para garantir que o sistema funcione sem problemas. Infelizmente, a tela de 1080p não se adequa a um portátil para jogos, com seus tempos de resposta lentos e altos desvios DeltaE nos decepcionando durante nossos testes.

Como esperado, o Nitro 5 mostrou-se poderoso o suficiente para rodar todos os jogos triple-A modernos. No entanto, isso só se aplica a quando o dispositivo está conectado, com o sistema controlando fortemente a CPU e a GPU quando funciona com energia da bateria. Efetivamente, o Nitro 5 se torna um dispositivo de escritório com a bateria, embora isso também seja verdade para muitos portáteis modernos.

O design principalmente de plástico, apesar de robusto e bem construído, vai dividir a opinião, com o Nitro 5 parecendo e se sentindo mais barato do que seus concorrentes que são feitos totalmente em metal. Ainda assim, um design de plástico pode ser algo que valha a pena comprometer para um desempenho de jogos decente.

No entanto, o Nitro 5 destacou-se da multidão com o seu consumo de energia impressionantemente baixo, com um consumo mais como de um ultrabook em modo inativo do que um portátil de jogos. Da mesma forma, nossa unidade de análise obtém uma excelente duração da bateria de sua bateria de 57 Wh, com poucos dispositivos similares que se aproximam às durações alcançadas em nossos testes.

Infelizmente, o afogamento térmico também foi um problema durante os nossos testes, com o Nitro 5 restringindo sua CPU quando levamos ela e a GPU a seus limites em nossos testes de estresse. Tangencialmente, a Acer equipou o Nitro 5 com o mínimo de portas, o que é decepcionante. Um DisplayPort e um leitor de cartões SD teriam sido bem-vindos, especialmente considerando a quantidade de espaço livre entre as portas que estão presentes. Pior ainda, a porta Type-C também não suporta o DisplayPort, extinguindo as possibilidades de conectar o Nitro 5 a um monitor externo através daquela saída de vídeo.

O Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517 é um portátil de jogos econômico que acerta muito, particularmente sua duração de bateria acima da média e um consumo de energia comparativamente baixo. Seus ventiladores excessivos e agudos, longos tempos de reação da tela e design de plástico podem causar que as pessoas procurem outra coisa.

No geral, a Acer criou um portátil de jogos de 17,3 polegadas competente e acessível com hardware atual. Embora seja impossível atualizar a CPU ou GPU, o Core i7-9750H e a GTX 1660 Ti serão poderosas o suficiente por pelo menos alguns anos de jogos triple-A.

The Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517 laptop review. Test device courtesy of Acer Germany.
The Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517 laptop review. Test device courtesy of Acer Germany.

The Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517 is a sturdy 17.3-inch inch gaming laptop. Theoretically, the Core i7-9750H and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti should make for a powerful system, with the 16 GB of dual-channel DDR4 RAM and 1.5 TB of combined storage being on hand to ensure that the system runs smoothly. Unfortunately, the 1080p display does not befit a gaming laptop, with its slow response times and high DeltaE deviations disappointing us during our tests.

As expected, the Nitro 5 proved powerful enough for running all modern triple-A games. However, this only applies to when the device is plugged in, with the system throttling its CPU and GPU heavily when running on battery power. Effectively, the Nitro 5 becomes an office device on battery, although this is also true of many modern gaming laptops.

The mainly plastic design, despite being sturdy and well-built, will divide opinion, with the Nitro 5 looking and feeling cheaper than its all-metal competitors. Still, a plastic design may be something worth compromising over for decent gaming performance.

However, the Nitro 5 stood out from the crowd with its impressively low power consumption, with it sipping power more like an ultrabook at idle than a gaming laptop. Correspondingly, our review unit gets excellent battery life from its 57 Wh battery, with few comparable devices coming close to the runtimes that it achieved in our tests.

Unfortunately, thermal throttling proved an issue during our tests too, with the Nitro 5 restricting its CPU when we pushed it and the GPU to their limits in our stress tests. Tangentially, Acer has equipped the Nitro 5 with the bare minimum of ports, which is disappointing. A DisplayPort and an SD card reader would have been welcome additions, especially considering the amount of free space between the ports that are present. Worse still, the Type-C port does not support DisplayPort either, extinguishing the possibilities of connecting the Nitro 5 to an external monitor via that video output.

The Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517 is a solid budget gaming laptop that gets a lot right, particularly its above-average battery life and comparatively low power consumption. Its excessive and high-pitched fans, slow display reaction times and plastic design may have people looking elsewhere though.

Overall, Acer has created a competent and affordable 17.3-inch gaming laptop with current hardware. While it is impossible to upgrade the CPU or GPU, the Core i7-9750H and GTX 1660 Ti will be powerful enough for at least a few years of triple-A gaming.

Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN517-51-7887 - 08/21/2019 v6(old)
Sebastian Bade

Acabamento
81 / 98 → 82%
Teclado
80%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
46 / 81 → 56%
Peso
58 / 10-66 → 86%
Bateria
88%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
94%
Desempenho da aplicação
97%
Temperatura
84 / 95 → 88%
Ruído
83 / 90 → 92%
Audio
81%
Camera
41 / 85 → 48%
Médio
78%
84%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Acer Aspire Nitro 5: Um portátil de jogos com duração da bateria decente
Sebastian Bade, 2019-08-26 (Update: 2019-08-27)