Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GL73 8SE (i7-8750H, RTX 2060)

RTX on a budget. Mesmo o portátil mais lento GeForce RTX 2060 pode ser tão rápido quanto uma GTX 1070 Max-Q. A oferta RTX de nível de entrada da MSI pode lidar com jogos quase tão bem quanto a sua série GE ou GT topo de gama ao custo de funcionalidades auxiliares e opções de conectividade.
MSI GL73 8SE-010US (GL73 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1200 MHz, Memoría: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, 417.49, Optimus
Memória
16 GB 
, DDR4-2666, PC4-21300, 19-19-19-43, Single-Channel
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, CMN1747, TN LED, Chi Mei N173HHE-G32, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Disco rígido
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ, 128 GB 
, Secundário: HGST HTS721010A9E630
Placa de Som
Nvidia TU106 - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
4 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm earphones, 3.5 mm headphones, Card Reader: Leitor SD
Funcionamento em rede
Qualcomm/Atheros e2400 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 33 x 419 x 287
Bateria
41 Wh Lítio-Ion, 6 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p30
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2 alto-falantes de 3 W, Teclado: SteelSeries chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Dragon Center 2.0, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
2.7 kg, Suprimento de energia: 754 g
Preço
1500 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

419 mm 287 mm 34 mm 3 kg419 mm 287 mm 33 mm 2.7 kg419 mm 287 mm 30 mm 2.9 kg418.5 mm 288.7 mm 29.9 mm 2.9 kg415.4 mm 279.2 mm 25 mm 3 kg413 mm 305 mm 21.95 mm 2.9 kg400 mm 279 mm 27 mm 2.8 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: SD reader, 2x USB 3.1 Type-A, AC adapter
Right: SD reader, 2x USB 3.1 Type-A, AC adapter
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: Kensington Lock, RJ-45, HDMI 1.4, mini-DisplayPort 1.2, USB 3.1 Type-A, USB 3.1 Type-C Gen. 1, 3.5 mm earphones, 3.5 mm microphone
Left: Kensington Lock, RJ-45, HDMI 1.4, mini-DisplayPort 1.2, USB 3.1 Type-A, USB 3.1 Type-C Gen. 1, 3.5 mm earphones, 3.5 mm microphone
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s +183%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26.81 MB/s
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26 MB/s -3%
Dell G3 17 3779
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
24.5 MB/s -9%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23.6 MB/s -12%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
84.8 MB/s +174%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
32 MB/s +3%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
30.98 MB/s
MSI GL72 7RDX-602
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
19.9 MB/s -36%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
662 MBit/s +6%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
623 MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
579 MBit/s -7%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
342 MBit/s -45%
Dell G3 17 3779
Intel Wireless AC 9462
321 MBit/s -48%
MSI GL73 8RD-418US
Intel Wireless AC 9462
245 MBit/s -61%
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
693 MBit/s +7%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
650 MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
630 MBit/s -3%
MSI GL73 8RD-418US
Intel Wireless AC 9462
317 MBit/s -51%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
305 MBit/s -53%
Dell G3 17 3779
Intel Wireless AC 9462
284 MBit/s -56%
313.1
cd/m²
327.5
cd/m²
317.1
cd/m²
304.7
cd/m²
326.4
cd/m²
315.7
cd/m²
295.6
cd/m²
327.3
cd/m²
323.7
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
CMN1747 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 327.5 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 316.8 cd/m² Minimum: 17.6 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 326.4 cd/m²
Contraste: 1166:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.83 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2.83
ΔE Greyscale 10.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
75.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
85.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.97
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
CMN1747, TN LED, 17.30, 1920x1080
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
LP173WF4-SPF6, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080
MSI GL72 7RDX-602
Chi Mei CMN1735 N173HGE-E11, TN LED, 17.30, 1920x1080
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
Chi Mei N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN WLED, 17.30, 1920x1080
Asus TUF FX705GM
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080
Dell G3 17 3779
AUO, B173HAN01.3, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080
MSI GL73 8RD-418US
Chi Mei N173HHE-G32, TN LED, 17.30, 1920x1080
Display
-23%
-19%
0%
-23%
-21%
-0%
Display P3 Coverage
91.1
66.4
-27%
65.2
-28%
90.8
0%
62.4
-32%
63.9
-30%
91.1
0%
sRGB Coverage
100
84.9
-15%
94.3
-6%
99.9
0%
88.8
-11%
89.8
-10%
99.9
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
85.4
62.1
-27%
65.6
-23%
85.8
0%
63.8
-25%
64.9
-24%
84.8
-1%
Response Times
-191%
-147%
-63%
10%
-207%
-46%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
12.8 ?(6.8, 6)
36.8 ?(18.8, 18)
-188%
29 ?(14, 15)
-127%
28 ?(16.4, 11.6)
-119%
7.4 ?(3.8, 3.6)
42%
38 ?(18, 20)
-197%
29.6 ?(13.2, 16.4)
-131%
Response Time Black / White *
8.2 ?(6, 2.2)
24 ?(14, 10)
-193%
26 ?(21, 5)
-217%
13.6 ?(11.8, 1.8)
-66%
10 ?(4.8, 5.2)
-22%
26 ?(15, 11)
-217%
8.6 ?(6.4, 2.2)
-5%
PWM Frequency
25770 ?(15)
961
-96%
25000 ?(14)
-3%
25510 ?(25)
-1%
Screen
-8%
-18%
16%
17%
6%
-4%
Brightness middle
326.4
328.7
1%
299
-8%
273
-16%
234
-28%
323
-1%
290.5
-11%
Brightness
317
318
0%
274
-14%
273
-14%
228
-28%
306
-3%
284
-10%
Brightness Distribution
90
91
1%
80
-11%
90
0%
85
-6%
89
-1%
81
-10%
Black Level *
0.28
0.51
-82%
0.25
11%
0.26
7%
0.2
29%
0.31
-11%
0.27
4%
Contrast
1166
645
-45%
1196
3%
1050
-10%
1170
0%
1042
-11%
1076
-8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
7.83
4.91
37%
12.92
-65%
3.52
55%
2.16
72%
4.96
37%
8.55
-9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
13.36
10.15
24%
19.91
-49%
6.34
53%
3.39
75%
8.25
38%
13.44
-1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.83
4.27
-51%
2.09
26%
2.02
29%
2.74
3%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
10.9
3.9
64%
13.16
-21%
3.11
71%
2
82%
5.65
48%
11.1
-2%
Gamma
1.97 112%
2.13 103%
2.36 93%
2.43 91%
2.46 89%
2.24 98%
1.85 119%
CCT
11056 59%
6911 94%
15046 43%
6999 93%
6394 102%
7441 87%
10912 60%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
75.8
55.6
-27%
60
-21%
76
0%
58
-23%
58
-23%
75.4
-1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
84.7
-15%
94
-6%
100
0%
89
-11%
90
-10%
99.9
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-74% / -34%
-61% / -42%
-16% / -1%
1% / 9%
-74% / -28%
-17% / -11%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 2.2 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
12.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 25770 Hz ≤ 15 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 25770 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 25770 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18110 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

065130195260325390455520585650715780845910975104011051170Tooltip
MSI GL73 8SE-010US GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø920 (906.29-1034.2)
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1193 (1158.58-1229.48)
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1041 (976.49-1204.86)
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1034 (1022.83-1162.62)
Dell G3 17 3779 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, SK hynix SC311 SATA; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø759 (750.51-796.5)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
Intel Core i9-8950HK
190 Points +12%
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
172 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (163 - 177, n=86)
172 Points +2%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
Intel Core i7-8750H
169 Points
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4
Intel Core i7-8550U
168 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
Intel Core i5-8300H
166 Points -2%
Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15IKB 81AC001AGE
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points -5%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
150 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1050Ti
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
138 Points -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1230 Points +19%
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
1218 Points +18%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (863 - 1251, n=93)
1113 Points +8%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
Intel Core i7-8750H
1034 Points
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
Intel Core i5-8300H
821 Points -21%
Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15IKB 81AC001AGE
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
683 Points -34%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
661 Points -36%
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4
Intel Core i7-8550U
651 Points -37%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1050Ti
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
510 (503.52min - 509.87max) Points -51%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
169 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1034 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
94.8 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Score
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
5465 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (5069 - 5839, n=3)
5342 Points +4%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
5169 Points +1%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
5118 Points
MSI GL73 8RD-418US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
4871 Points -5%
Dell G3 17 3779
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, SK hynix SC311 SATA
4442 Points -13%
Essentials
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
8791 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (8308 - 9327, n=3)
8677 Points +3%
MSI GL73 8RD-418US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
8530 Points +2%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
8397 Points
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
8276 Points -1%
Dell G3 17 3779
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, SK hynix SC311 SATA
7888 Points -6%
Productivity
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
7264 Points +2%
MSI GL73 8RD-418US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
7252 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (6808 - 7415, n=3)
7106 Points 0%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
7096 Points
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
7025 Points -1%
Dell G3 17 3779
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, SK hynix SC311 SATA
6668 Points -6%
Digital Content Creation
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
7370 Points +21%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (6108 - 7814, n=3)
6725 Points +10%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
6108 Points
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
6071 Points -1%
MSI GL73 8RD-418US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
5070 Points -17%
Dell G3 17 3779
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, SK hynix SC311 SATA
4342 Points -29%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4660 Points +20%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
4498 Points +16%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (3876 - 5077, n=3)
4373 Points +13%
MSI GL73 8RD-418US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
4235 Points +9%
Dell G3 17 3779
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, SK hynix SC311 SATA
3886 Points 0%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
3876 Points
MSI GL72 7RDX-602
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
3220 Points -17%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
5719 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (5291 - 5899, n=3)
5516 Points +3%
MSI GL73 8RD-418US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
5396 Points +1%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
5359 Points
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
5342 Points 0%
Dell G3 17 3779
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, SK hynix SC311 SATA
5218 Points -3%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4735 Points -12%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3876 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5359 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
5118 pontos
Ajuda
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
Asus TUF FX705GM
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
Dell G3 17 3779
SK hynix SC311 SATA
AS SSD
-68%
-24%
116%
-34%
Seq Read
794
979
23%
511
-36%
1571
98%
511
-36%
Seq Write
427.6
125.4
-71%
425.7
0%
1236
189%
254.4
-41%
4K Read
21.91
19.73
-10%
14.07
-36%
38.49
76%
24.22
11%
4K Write
56.6
38.73
-32%
38.34
-32%
101.9
80%
58.5
3%
4K-64 Read
354.3
168.6
-52%
351.4
-1%
720
103%
160.7
-55%
4K-64 Write
285.7
31.38
-89%
172.7
-40%
856
200%
114.8
-60%
Access Time Read *
0.237
0.519
-119%
0.235
1%
0.106
55%
0.136
43%
Access Time Write *
0.09
0.324
-260%
0.097
-8%
0.036
60%
0.069
23%
Score Read
456
286
-37%
417
-9%
913
100%
236
-48%
Score Write
385
86
-78%
254
-34%
1082
181%
199
-48%
Score Total
1061
479
-55%
881
-17%
2458
132%
552
-48%
Copy ISO MB/s
811
272.7
-66%
412.5
-49%
154.9
-81%
Copy Program MB/s
278
182.9
-34%
192.9
-31%
99.8
-64%
Copy Game MB/s
556
134.6
-76%
295.5
-47%
124.2
-78%

* ... smaller is better

Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1214 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 386.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 303.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 204 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 8.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 404.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 32.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 71.2 MB/s
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-9900K
20901 Points +33%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
18153 Points +15%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
17980 Points +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (14768 - 18358, n=43)
16301 Points +4%
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
16010 Points +2%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
15731 Points
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
11752 Points -25%
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H
11366 Points -28%
MSI GL73 8RD-418US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
8075 Points -49%
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK
7374 Points -53%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R7 2700U
6262 Points -60%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
6230 Points -60%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
3679 Points +22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (3020 - 3859, n=29)
3431 Points +14%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
3020 Points
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-9900K
28606 Points +42%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
23261 Points +15%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
22723 Points +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (19143 - 24662, n=40)
21459 Points +6%
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
20573 Points +2%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
20157 Points
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
14534 Points -28%
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H
14351 Points -29%
Asus TUF FX705GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
13722 Points -32%
MSI GL73 8RD-418US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
9944 Points -51%
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK
9032 Points -55%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R7 2700U
8451 Points -58%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
7769 Points -61%
1280x720 Performance Combined
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-9900K
16949 Points +86%
Asus TUF FX705GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
12124 Points +33%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (1107 - 14726, n=40)
11688 Points +28%
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
11407 Points +25%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
11115 Points +22%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
10749 Points +18%
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H
9792 Points +8%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
9099 Points
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
8958 Points -2%
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK
8450 Points -7%
MSI GL73 8RD-418US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
8271 Points -9%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
6859 Points -25%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R7 2700U
5792 Points -36%
3DMark 11 Performance
15612 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
29408 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
13774 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
5679 pontos
Ajuda
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
68.9 fps +25%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
62.9 fps +14%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
61.7 fps +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (50.6 - 74, n=40)
61.1 fps +11%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
55.1 fps
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
54.2 fps -2%
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
38.5 fps -30%
Lenovo Legion Y7000P-1060
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
37 fps -33%
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
26 fps -53%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
24 fps -56%
MSI GL72 7RDX-602
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
23.8 fps -57%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
20.6 fps -63%
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
MSI GL73 8SE-010US GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ: Ø55.1 (43-58)
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 230.2 198.8 201.5 127.9
The Witcher 3 (2015) 188.7 157.5 104.3 55.1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 93 75 70 65
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
MSI GL73 8RD-418US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
Noise
11%
-0%
-6%
11%
-2%
off / environment *
28.6
28
2%
30.5
-7%
29
-1%
28.5
-0%
30
-5%
Idle Minimum *
33.8
28
17%
32.1
5%
32
5%
29.2
14%
32
5%
Idle Average *
34
28
18%
32.1
6%
33
3%
29.3
14%
33
3%
Idle Maximum *
34.1
31.3
8%
32.3
5%
44
-29%
29.3
14%
34
-0%
Load Average *
36.5
33.4
8%
42.9
-18%
46
-26%
32.7
10%
41
-12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
47.8
42.8
10%
48
-0%
42.7
11%
50
-5%
Load Maximum *
52.2
46.2
11%
48.8
7%
50
4%
45.2
13%
54
-3%

* ... smaller is better

Barulho

Ocioso
33.8 / 34 / 34.1 dB
Carga
36.5 / 52.2 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.6 dB(A)
 47 °C45.4 °C36.4 °C 
 30.8 °C41 °C27.6 °C 
 21.4 °C22 °C21.6 °C 
Máximo: 47 °C
Médio: 32.6 °C
44.4 °C35 °C36.4 °C
24.4 °C42.4 °C27.6 °C
22 °C22 °C22 °C
Máximo: 44.4 °C
Médio: 30.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  40.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.3 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 22 °C / 71.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+6.9 °C / 12.4 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.848.62538.247.23137.448.14040.7495036.850.56334.751.68035.453.810033.35312534.55416032.355.220030.45725030.360.231530.164.740028.971.550029.481.163029.683.480031.179.9100029.578.4125029.684.5160028.686.520002980.5250028.982.5315028.980.7400029.182.1500028.588.263002880.9800027.781.21000027.674.71250027.476.91600027.575.4SPL41.195N4.1114.4median 29.1median 80.5Delta1.15.535.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI GL73 8SE-010USApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI GL73 8SE-010US audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.58 / 0.86 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 8.8 / 16.2 / 18.3 Watt
Carga midlight 86.1 / 186.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.30
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY, TN WLED, 1920x1080, 17.30
MSI GL73 8RD-418US
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.30
MSI GL72 7RDX-602
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.30
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TN, 1920x1080, 17.30
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.60
Power Consumption
-34%
-7%
4%
-3%
-11%
Idle Minimum *
8.8
15
-70%
11.8
-34%
9.6
-9%
8
9%
16.2
-84%
Idle Average *
16.2
20
-23%
18.7
-15%
15
7%
14
14%
18.2
-12%
Idle Maximum *
18.3
26
-42%
19.8
-8%
16.5
10%
22
-20%
18.9
-3%
Load Average *
86.1
97
-13%
100.8
-17%
104
-21%
92
-7%
82.7
4%
Witcher 3 ultra *
146.7
186
-27%
124.4
15%
154
-5%
125.7
14%
Load Maximum *
186.4
239
-28%
151.6
19%
129
31%
207
-11%
162.3
13%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
6h 28min
WiFi Websurfing
2h 48min
Carga (máximo brilho)
0h 33min
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 41 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 76 Wh
MSI GL72 7RDX-602
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 43.2 Wh
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 51 Wh
Asus TUF FX705GM
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 64 Wh
Dell G3 17 3779
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 56 Wh
MSI GL73 8RD-418US
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 41 Wh
Battery Runtime
100%
9%
1%
83%
159%
-8%
Reader / Idle
388
789
103%
327
-16%
303
-22%
380
-2%
733
89%
WiFi v1.3
168
402
139%
203
21%
186
11%
272
62%
345
105%
155
-8%
Load
33
52
58%
40
21%
38
15%
95
188%
126
282%

Pro

+ Garantia padrão de dois anos se comprado da Xotic PC
+ Tela TN de alta qualidade com 100% de cobertura sRGB
+ Tempos de resposta rápidos; ghosting mínimo
+ Temperaturas relativamente frias da superfície
+ Iluminação do teclado agora padrão
+ Leve para o seu tamanho
+ Alto falantes internos muito fortes
+ Alto falantes internos potentes
+ Rápido desempenho da GPU
+ 3 baias de armazenamento

Contra

- Problemas com a resposta do touchpad em velocidades baixas
- Tons de cinza e cores imprecisas, de fábrica
- O desempenho Turbo Boost da CPU poderia ser melhor
- O serviço a ser realizado pelo usuário final requer quebrar um adesivo
- Ruído forte da ventoinha inclusive para um portátil de jogos
- Baixa capacidade da bateria; curta duração da bateria
- Sem Thunderbolt 3 ou G-Sync
- As superfícies amam digitais
- Sem subwoofer; graves fracos
- Lento leitor de cartões SD
- Marcos grossos da tela
In review: MSI GL73 8SE-010US. Test model provided by Xotic PC
In review: MSI GL73 8SE-010US. Test model provided by Xotic PC

Quando verificamos o RTX 2070 Max-Q no Blade 15, vimos que seu desempenho 1080p foi apenas 15 por cento superior ao GTX 1070 Max-Q. Por isso esperávamos o mesmo do RTX 2060 em relação ao GTX 1060. Estamos entusiasmados ao descobrir que o RTX 2060 é, na verdade, cerca de 35% mais rápido ou mais do que o GTX 1060 para um maior ganho de desempenho ger-a-ger. Ainda cai um pouco quando comparado ao GTX 1070 e, portanto, os proprietários do GTX 1070 não estão perdendo — pelo menos até que o DLSS e ray tracing se tornem mais comuns. Na verdade, o RTX 2060 tem mais em comum com uma GTX 1070 Max-Q do que a GTX 1070, mesmo com consumo de energia.

Quanto ao próprio MSI GL73, os recursos de destaque incluem seus compartimentos de armazenamento interno triplos, alto-falantes muito potentes e painel de alta qualidade de 120 Hz, que são relativamente incomuns em portáteis de jogos econômicos. Tenha em mente que seus ventiladores podem ser bastante barulhentos durante os jogos e que sua duração de bateria é de apenas duas horas, na melhor das hipóteses. O resto do portátil é padrão e orientado para o orçamento em vista de suas superfícies plásticas e dobradiças pequenas. Recomendamos uma calibração do usuário final para obter uma tela com maior precisão de cores também.

As principais características que nos impedem de declarar o MSI GL73 melhor que o concorrente Asus TUF FX705 são seus marcos grossos e maior tamanho. As temperaturas do núcleo são mais baixas do que as do Asus e há mais opções de armazenamento, mas o valor dessas trocas dependerá do usuário. 

Se a GeForce RTX móvel não for uma opção indispensável, os sistemas com a GTX 1070 de última geração serão boas alternativas, especialmente agora que os preços de portáteis de jogos GTXestiveram caindo.

O MSI GL73 tem tudo o que você precisa para uma máquina de jogos 1080p, desde suas amplas opções de armazenamento até a sua tela rápida de 5 ms/120 Hz e gráficos Nvidia Turing de próxima geração. Se você vai viajar com frequência, no entanto, pode valer a pena considerar o mais portátil Asus TUF FX705.

MSI GL73 8SE-010US - 02/12/2019 v6(old)
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
72 / 98 → 74%
Teclado
81%
Mouse
73%
Conectividade
58 / 81 → 71%
Peso
59 / 10-66 → 87%
Bateria
68%
Pantalha
83%
Desempenho do jogos
94%
Desempenho da aplicação
95%
Temperatura
91 / 95 → 95%
Ruído
73 / 90 → 81%
Audio
60%
Camera
45 / 85 → 53%
Médio
73%
82%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil MSI GL73 8SE (i7-8750H, RTX 2060)
Allen Ngo, 2019-02-16 (Update: 2019-02-19)